ML20154E560

Advises That 760930 Draft Security Plan Unacceptable Since Necessary Details Required for Effective Security Plan Removed

ML20154E560
Person / Time
Site:	05000142
Issue date:	12/02/1976
From:	Lear G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Brown H CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
Shared Package
ML20154E537	List: ML20154E534 ML20154E550 ML20154E560 ML20154E565 ML20154E570 ML20154E574 ML20154E585
References
FOIA-85-196 NUDOCS 8805200251
Download: ML20154E560 (1)

Text

_--_________ -

[f * * %g# #e UNITED STATES f f s* -

• NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 h WASHINGTON D. C 20555

's. $5- E' / E

%, ..... / , December 2,1976 i

Docket No. 50-142 The Regents of the University of California ATTN: Mr. Harold V. Brown Environmental Health and Safety Officer Los Angeles, Califorr.ia 90024 Gentlemen:

We have completed our review of the draft security plan for the UCLA Nuclear Energy Laboratory, submitted by your letter dated September 30, 1976. Through the draft security plan, we have reviewed your concept of relegating many details of the existing plan to the status of written procedures. As you indicated, these procedures would be subject to C review and approval by a Laboratory Security Committee (LSC).

We find that the draft security plan is unacceptable since the necessary details required for an effective security plan have been removed. Mo re-over, by incorporating these details in written procedures, the LSC could make substantial changes in the security plan without prior approval or notification of the NRC.

I In view of the above, the security plan for the UCLA Nuclear Energy Laboratory should be maintained in the format of the presently applicable i

plan approved by our letter dated September 13, 1976.

j

/ Sincerely, A-r-

• George Lear, Chief 1 Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors 1

i

(

8805200251 080513 A ER c196 PDR D3