ML20154B593

Affidavit of R Bergeron.* Discusses Meaning of Color Coding of RG-58 Coaxial Cable in Facility & Reasoning for Assigning Operability Code A.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20154B593
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	09/09/1988
From:	Bergeron R PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
To:
Shared Package
ML20154B444	List: ML20154B441 ML20154B459 ML20154B491 ML20154B532 ML20154B572 ML20154B593
References
OL-1, NUDOCS 8809140061
Download: ML20154B593 (69)

Text

k ;..

4 DOCKETED U: tac

's g? 12 P157 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the

.; r:

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

)

In the Matter of

)

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY

)

Docket Nos. 50-443 OL-1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al.

)

50-444 OL-1

)

(Seabrook Station, Units 1

)

(On-site Emergency and 2)

)

Planning and Safety

)

Issues)

)

AFFIDAVIT OF RICdARD BERGERON I, RICHARD BERGERON, being on oath, depose and say as follows:

1.

I am the Instrumentation and Controls Engineering Supervisor for New Hampshire Yankee.

My responsibilities include the supervision of the Instrumentation and Controls engineering / design activities and the Seabrook Station Equipment Qualification program.

In this capacity I am responsible for identifying, locating and categorizing RG-58 coaxial cable applications and the determination of which cables require compliance with the environmental qualification requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49.

A statement of ty professional qualifications is attached and marked "A".

2.

This affidavit describes the meaning of the color-coding of RG-58 coaxial cable in Seabrook Station and the reasoning 8809140061 000909j 43 ADOCK O gDR

6 s

a 4

for having assigned it operability Code A; the means used to identify and locate all Seabrook Station RG-58 coaxial cable applications; the means used to identify those RG-58 cables which could be subjected to a harsh environment within the Seabrook Station Unit i nuclear island (see Attachment B) ;

the rationale for determining that RG-58 coaxial cable is nonsafety-related; and the rationale why only cables located in harsh environments within the nuclear island need be replaced.

3.

Specification 9763-006-113-19 establishes the requirements for all of the specialty cable supplied to Seabrook Station by ITT Surprenant.

It includes RG-11 coaxial, RG-11 triaxial, RG-58 coaxial and RG-59 coaxial cables supplied under Purchase order 113-19.

The specification assigns Cable code TA6Y to the RG-58 cable.

Cable codes are used to identify plant cables and are described in the Computerized Conduit and Cable Schedule Programs (CASP) Design Guide.

In the Design Guide, Cable Code TA6Y denotes that RG-58 is a coaxial, single conductor cable, and is colored black with a red tracer to signify that it is non-vital, associated with Train A.

4.

The RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant was specified and purchased with a black with red trace jacket color.

See EQF excerpts provided as Attachment C.

As discussed in FSAR Section 8.3.1.3, cables which are colored.--

d black with a red tracer are Train A associated.

See Attachment D for excerpts from the referenced FSAR sections.

As discussed in FSAR Section 8.3.1.4, cables which are identified by a black with a red tracer color jacket are nonsafety-related cables.

Further, FSAR Section 8.3.1.4.a also indicates that associated cables are Non-Class IE circuits.

Finally, FSAR Section 8.3.1.4.k when read in conjunction with FSAR Section 8.3.1.3 indicates that cables with the single solid color of red, white, blue or yellow signify cables which are safety-related or class IE.

Therefore, it is clear from the FSAR that the RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant is not intended to perform an accident mitigating function (i.e.,

it is nonsafety-related).

5.

During the initial development of the EQ program, it was decided to use the very conservative approach of reviewing cable for the most restrictive potential application (e.g.,

Operability Code A) regardless of actual plant application.

This approach eliminated the necessity for implementation of special programmatic controls restricting cable usage.

As testified to previously (Transcript excerpts provided as Attachment E), a conservative assumption was made during the initial phase of the Environmental Qualification Program, namely that a given piece of equipment, cable, etc. was required to perform a safety function.

However, it is 4

possible that the EQ File could indicate thit the cable is Operability Code A which designates that it is required to perform a safety function, but, in actuality the cable is only required to be evaluated to determine if any failures of the cable dus to the environment will affect the accomplishment of a safety function.

This is the case for the RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by 1TT Surprenant.

The ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable was specified, purchased, environmentally qualified and installed within the nuclear island to safety-related requirements, but it does not perform any accident mitigating function.

6.

Equipment identification numbers for cables were pically assigned only to each type of cable within each purchase order (types of cables being power, control, instrument or thermocouple. )

The primary purpose of the equipment identification number in the Harsh Environment Equipment List was to tie the cable type to an EQ File.

For each type of cable there may have been numerous cable codes, depicting various constructions, sizes, and colors, all within the same EQ File.

The specific requiremants for each cable code were considered within the EQ File and the acceptance criteria established accordingly.

7.

The first method for identifying RG-58 coaxial cable applications was through the use of the cable Schedule Program (CASP).

CASP is a computer based system for l

4 maintaining the design configuration of both safety-related and nonsafety-related installed plant cables such as the RG-58 coaxial cable.

The CASP system provides the controls to identify and maintain cable routes and termination locations for each uniquely identified plant cable.

8.

The CASP database is an appropriate means to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications for three reasons.

First, CASP is the primary design document for configuration control for electrical cable at Seabrook Station.

Second, CASP has the capability to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications by means of sorting on the Cable Code TA6Y because the PG-58 coaxial cable which was supplied by ITT Surprenant only uses the Design Guide Cable Code TA6Y.

Therefore, a sort of the CASP database on the Cable Code TA6Y will identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications.

Third, one capability of CASP used at Seabrook Station is to determine th' shortest route and length of a cable, given the network of raceways, the origin and destination of cable, and applicable design requirements.

This information is then used to install, inspect and maintain the cable.

Accordingly, CASP is subjected to the comprehensive design verification and updating process used for any installation document subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

This l I

necessarily provides the additional assurance that CASP agrees with the as-built condition of the plant.

9.

A sort was made of CASP to generate a list of all installed cables with the Cable Code TA6Y used to denote the ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable.

This sort identified 126 RG-58 coaxial cable runs, all nonsafety-related.

10.

The second method for identifying RG-58 coaxial cable applications was through a review of the electrical schematic drawing packages.

At Seabrook Station the electrical schematic drawings are contained in electrical schematic drawings packages.

These packages, in addition to the schematic drawing, contain other information such as cable tables.

Thus, a review of the schematic drawings in conjunction with other information contained in that drawing package allows one to identify the cable chosen, (e.g.,

ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable) for a specific cable circuit.

11.

The Seabrook Station electrical schematic drawing package review is also appropriate to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable runs because these are design basis documents whose input is not derived from CASP and because l

one can determine the cable applications for a given cable circuit from these documents.

These documents have also been subjected to the comprehensive design verification and updating process used for design basis documents under 10 CFR --

6 50, Appendix B.

Thus, these documents can be relied upon to identify what cable was used in what applications.

12.

It should be noted that the results of the reviews using CASP dnd the electrical schematics were consistent.

13.

The method of categorizing the RG-58 coaxial cable applications was through the use of cable raceway drawings and environmental zone maps.

Following the identification of a specific ITT Surprentant RG-58 coaxial cable (i.e.,

specific cable identification number) the route of each cable was traced by using Seabrook Station cable raceway drawings.

In conjunction with tracing the route of an identified RG-58 cable, a review was performed to identify the cable (s) routed with the RG-58 cable (s).

This was done using CASP to identify other cables sharing the raceway with the RG-58 cable (s).

CASP was also used to determine whether the other cable was safety-related (i.e., class IE) or nonsafety-related (i.e., Non-Class IE).

14.

After each RG-58 cable route was established, the environmental zones through which each cable traveled was determined using Environmen*, Zone Maps contained in the Service Environment Chart Design Basis Calculation.

The Service Environment Charts were used to identify the applicable environmental parameters for each environmental zone.

See FSAR Figure 3.11(B)-1, Shts I-5, provided in Attachment D, and Excerpt from Environmental Qualification,

s Report provided in Attachment F.

The harsh environment zones were then superimposed upon the cable raceway drawings used to trace the RG-58 coaxial cable routing.

15.

This evaluation also concluded that none of the RG-58 coaxial cables are routed inside the Containment Building or in the Main Steam and Feedwater pipe chases.

A review of applicable drawings and documents and related documentation was performed.

This verified that the drawings and documents used in the evaluation reflected the as-built configuration.

16.

The information obtained from the above reviews were evaluated to identify common groupings of cables.

This evaluation categorized the 126 RG-58 coaxial cables into the following:

No. of Cables Catecorv 21 Spare RG-58 cables 12 RG-58 cables (now spares) routed at least partially through a harsh environment within the nuclear island (replaced with RG-59) 74 RG-58 cables located in mild environments within the nuclear island 10 RG-58 cables routed with other nonsafety-related cables outside the nuclear island 9

RG-58 cables routed in mild environments within the nuclear island and routed with nonsafety-related cables outside the nuclear island s

17.

Following the review of environmental zones described in paragraph 14 above, each RG-58 coaxial cable application was then categorized into one of five common groupings, as summarized in Attachment G.

The tabulation provided in Attachment G identifies each RG-58 coaxial cable, indicates which category it falls under (e.g.,

spare, hatsh, etc.) and specified its function, classification and the environmental zone's) for each cable.

In addition, the tabulation refers to figures diagramming the applications, which are provided in Attachment H.

18.

The figures provided in Attachment H depict the routing a given cable follows through the various environmental zones at Seabrook Station and identifies the building and specific environmental zone the cable passes through.

They also indicate whether the cables are inside or outside the nuclear island, and for those cables within the nuclear island whether the zone is harsh or mild.

The process used to develop the information to produce the figures is discussed above at paragraphs 13 and 14.

19.

As indicated above, none of the 126 RG-58 coaxial cables are safety-related; therefore, none are within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49 (b) (1).

An evaluation was made of the above five cable categories to determine which cables are required to otherwise comply with the environmental qualification requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49.

To determine if a O

a s

given component, cable, etc., is required to be environmentally qualified pursuant to 10 CFR 50.49, one must first determine if the item its within the scope of concern as i

l discussed in 10 CFR 50.49(b) and then determine if the item is not in a mild environment, per 10 CFR 50.49(c).

If the

)

item is not within the scope of concern as discussed in 10 1

a CFR 50.49(b) then the inquiry into the applicability of 10 l

CFR 50.49 ands.

If the item is within the scope of concern

]

but is in a mild environment then the inquiry into the applicability of 10 CFR 50.49 also ends.

In either casa 10 i

CFR 50.49 qualification requirements would not apply.

l Spare cables are not functioning or energized and l

20.

therefore would not pose any threat to other cables in the

]

same raceway.

In order to use a spare cable, a design change has to be initiated prior to its incorporation into the plant design.

One of the considerations in any design change is the need to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49.

l The design control program prevents a cable which is not qualified for a given application from being used.

The spare l

cables are subjected to this design control process which I

l precludes the use of any spare until the cable has been i

designated for use in the plant design, has been reviewed through the design control process and has been shown to meet l

all applicable NRC regulations.

Until such time as the spare f

cables are designated for use in the plant design, they need l

I l

i

A 1

not comply with the environmental qualification requirements of 10 CFR 50.49.

21.

10 CFR 50.49(c) provides in pertinent part "Requirements for.

(3) environmental qualification of electric equipment important to safety located in mild environment are not included within the scope of this section (10 CFR j

50.49)."

A mild environment is defined as "an environment that would at no time be significantly more severe than the I

environment that would occur during normal plant operation including anticipated operational occurrences."

10 CFR 50.49(c).

Therefore, cables located in mild environments are not required to comply with the environmental qualificat. ion requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49.

22.

10 CFR 50.49(b) provides in pertinent part "Electric equipment laportant to safety covered by this section (10 CFR 50.49) is:

(2) Nonsafety-related equipment whose failure under postulated environmental conditions could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of safety functions.

by the safety-related equipment."

Therefore RG-58 coaxial cables which are routed with other nonsafety-related cables outside the nuclear island need not comply with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49.

23.

Fer those applications outside the nuclear island none were identified where a safety-related cable was being routed along with the RG-58 coaxial cable outside the nuclear I

s s

island.

Thus, the postulated failure of any of these RG-58 coaxial cable cannot prevent satisfactory accomplishment of safety functions by safety-related equipment since none of the cables it comes in contact with outside the nuclear island are safety-related (i.e.,

the failure could only affect another nonsafety-related cable).

Therefore, the RG-58 coaxial cables outside the nuclear island are not "important to safety," the qualification requirements of 10 CFR 50.'49 are not applicable and further.3quiry is not required for these cables.

24.

Based on the foregoing, the only cables which may need to comply with the environmental qualification requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49 are the twelve (12) nonsafety-related RG-58 coaxial cables which are routed at least l

partially through a harsh environment within the nuclear island.

10 C.F.R.

50. 49 (b) (2).

These cables are: FM3-JW5; FM3-JW5/11 FM6-JW5; FM6-JW5/11 FM4-JX1; FM4-JX1/1; FM7-JX1; FM7-JX1/1; GU4-Y59/2; GU4-Y59/3; GU4-YS9/4; and GU4-YS9/5.

These 12 RG-58 coaxial cables havebeen replaced with already qualified RG-59 cable as contained in EQ File 113-19-01 (NECNP Exh. No. 4). '

4 o

n r ~.

& A <_

_ e Richard Bergeron d'

Dated:

September 9, 1988 Then personally appeared Richard Bergeron, before tind personally known to me, who, being first duly sworn, made oath that the foregoing statements are true to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.

I

'k' a., h r1!'_hOvb Notary Public

./

My Commission Expires: ffDib 3

/

J i

l o

4 BERGERON AFFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT A RICHARD BERGERON Instrumentation & Controls Engineering Supervisor Education B.S.

Marine Engineering Maine Maritime Academy - May 1969 Summary of Exoerience Mr. Bergeron joined Public Service Company of New Hampshire in May 1982 as Senior I&C Engineer in the Engineering Services Oepartment.

His areas of responsibility include coordination o* I&C Engineering activities for the Station Staff, Construction and Startup interface activities, as well as various special projects.

Mr. Bergeron was recently appointed to the position of Intrumentation &

Control Supervisor in the Engineering Department.

For the past six years Mr. Bergeron has also been assigned as the Station Staff Representative on the Equipment Qualification Task Force.

He has been responsible for the coordination and review of the Equipment Qualification Program, as well as coordinating the implementation of the Station Equipment Qualification Program.

Mr. Bergeron came to Public Service Company of New Hampshire from Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, where he was employed from 1972-1982.

He held the position of Principal Instrument Application Engineer, responsible for specifying, purchasing and design review of electron and pneumatic instrumentation control systems.

Mr. Bergeron is also experienced in the scheduling and preparation of Logic Diagrams and System Descriptions which define the. functional control concepts.

He was also assigned as a task member to assist in the development and preparation of the 79-OlB equipment qualification submittal for Duquesne Light company.

Between 1969 and 1972, Mr. Bergeron was employed by Gulf Oil Corporation as an engineer in their Marine Engineering Division.

There he was responsible for the operation and maintenance of their Marine Power Plants.

J

l' s'

BERGERON AFFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT B KEY PLAN-NUCLEAR ISLAND AREA ELECTRICAL CONTENTS FSAR Fig. 8.3-58 i

c.,-

s l

A pN aw

-.t'hw

!e JT m3 a

L j _'

. ',Ngu gg L..

_.J 3

n

/,ll lY f Y

,)

e a

s e

e l.

El O

• C *.

/ g

-: g g

e e

/

I l

_..,. g 1.

um-o I._

..y

(

-rag-Q i

as c., _.~

.. I I

Q l

i l

8 V13 1

I 1

1--

9'

• k')

C

• • M i

m 8

I

)

\\

i

/

i I

k lg r +

-t,

[.':193h i

n b

l L (\\f

.,=

~

sms L...,.,_._._,,...L i -5 raw. %%..?4 p.

.q

..> p n 6 vm

.... e n

h y,,1 3*

m.cy.

.q M-- -'

KA.. w 79)

M ; %dE R

==

J..MLM '"%

e x

ex s

,~ ~ '.

4 96

_. f.~i usyh 2pym g

t_ s.

..............; y i_Amee.

s. !

m l

.,,=.:;;.;,_-;--

-m m 7 - -

==

r

..g g g...,.............._ g......

7.-

\\

.k j

i

{

t w

9 5

r 4 8u** -enname

Amendment 61 Novzbar 1986 x

X

- r. n

\\1 O:,!710'l.7.'d'M "',' **

i

=.*~~w.

%."2

'.01:T.J.'r.f/Cr Ya"

=

N

. 'w, g.;;;,y,;;;,.g,,.y;n.,,;,,7, ~

r l. gj;,=,,;y,;f-.

.~ ~.

wm.

6 I

- ~.

=cl'.

. -... 72.?./"J..::'.=f.2.0

- ' Y.

3 s

w,-

m NQ _h t.. t... u....

m,,,..

..~.

' ' ~

I g

N N,..

y,, w, e.....a Nm 9-s y

.'*u,,.1."..*;.".. 7,.ll* '.;.*.;.;;;*"

t

~. *:

~.. ~.

~ ~ ~ -. ~ *

~ * ~.

c->'=--~~.~*

... -. - -... ~......

y [

~ =~

,,;;;',,,,,,,,,.a.= s.. e se a w

~ ' ' ~

u s

~i',

m.*Ls.L_A a re:.sm

• e

}

l.9 -._ p,,,j'L**Q *,,"y,*f,jgy,=',7gQ O

• '* * * *ses, s

3, 4,,

,--_. ~ _"_=-- % g 1

,; g :,.;..g l

o

. gg., _, _.,.,,,,,,,,

..~.......m

..,,,,,_J t

i

... w i

,g I

Ei..e LAALA441.

t

=

q.,:..... ~er=....:=.. rl.:.:.:.::'

SI

...... ~..,

c. q.

; : :ty. ;;::r..=:,"'

APERTURE i

T" CARD i.

l

--we u.,, n

.s

_mun.,

c2 l

Also Available On I

b 3d

\\

,,.m y'oi

.m e.-

o_. _A.w 9. n, - - ~....

.__.",c.

=_

.x._z_m m_

,, _ =

m.n \\.

w e.+ pc. m& +w - @.

a g $ ;$. y\\'@j%$ Ds iyp

+

)

2 L

$b.w

,, %~ -

\\.

.4 i

%i.ey' M.-., %..._ 3,.

e@m.t ti' hNN'%a.

g'M- -

i

.-) +la#

I,. -

t i

I l

i W i

)

s. w n:9!L%

s"wjd.

w+$

u..u.._um

.L_

.s s.

%x n

n4'. u,,, ~4 w

e es b

m

. m. _

wp%.4 d y..1. cP'.vd,.ww

';Ek

'\\x ' d M

N\\

I a( W=

-. E f

i s.

g x m

i

.i j!

pm.g i

=1

.'N

-s

.._wxe %x e

a_

_m x

sx

......w LN\\ \\ w%

.c rm.6 ' m l

!I

-O'\\

"' Q:

• s.3 j'

a..

sto---- ; t' ig,g,,-

..a sr l

.s\\~ -

a wer=

p

. g' vTae w.i2 j

y, j

,y u%}

i p

s-=.cv 3 :--m

- mm ( :c :~s ~~-- w

-f-h ' W:

? U

g,

~ 3 : ~:

u.!

12: ::

.. w_

V.-

--tqm.ac 6m y l

c

~

.! '- -" m.:

,p i

w... m... g x

-g

,. n 5

_N i

%.~.v um I

\\:.;y;y!

l 3.

2_,

4.s wouug a 6s I

i.'

l l

M O h @ O Clo( - O PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIPE KEY PLAN NUCLEAR ISLAND AREA ELECTRICAL SEABROOK STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 9763.F.300210 l

FIGURE 8.3 58

r f

BERGERON AFFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION FILE NO. 113-19-01 EXCERPTS 1

CONTENTS I

f Marsh Environment Equipment List Equipment Summary Evaluation (p. 1 of 1)

Qualification Evaluation Work Sheet, 11/05/86 Appendix A, Spec. No. 9763-006-113-19 Pg. No. Al UE&C Purchase Order, EQF Ref. 7, pgs. 1 & 2 of 4 I

l l

l t

f

e

,

:,. :a', I;;i; en: Q;alif1:a:1:n Tile ::o,113.t 9.gg 2.e e : s u -

e l

e e

2 e

e e

s e

e,

,o 2w

• e 8

.a e

2 e

,,s wW 8 4 e !

aw e

43 e

5

' '8 a

w 2

4 e

e s

6 m

9 e

e e

e 9

e m

9 e

6 a

3m 9

e a.

O e

w 4

e e.

9 J s

4 e 3 e

e6

.e e

O e

9 o

6 e

l i

=

s

. o 0 -

9 @@

.e.s S e ===,

e m2 e *

• e m et a

00 e==

.e mL e**

e 3

6 e

9 e

4 2

9 3 0 e'

9 m

6 e

j 0

e 3 =

N g

e e

W 4

8 a e

es 9 a 2

m Ow 6 4 e

6 e

9 t

e e

m o

e e

G f

e O s = =

e e

t O

G e

O 2 -

e e

e w

0 3 =. a e

.a w

6

.e W

G M

W e

a t

3 e

w

=g e

g

,e

- S Ue 9

he 4

e a

.e a * *.s e

O W

$ e g g

e en e e

I U

9 mg l

g 0 4b

.a 9

s l

W G

I e

e w

o 9 I

3 5.:.

d w

)

ge2 d

i e

.e

=

w 4 h

N OO I

e 4

W I

D 4 em w

,e l

i ft :

3

.e e

G 4

e v

e g

4 i

I 9

l

=

a l

l

• 5 r

e e

1

~

f

$ 5 Q g i

3 2

{

e y

a w E

8 9 e

5 g

e 5

l3 e

1 g

4 e

a I

i p

e e

i 3 Et : i

Electrical Equipment Qualification File No. 113 19 01 Revision 2 g

EQUIPMENT SUMMARf EVALUATION

,3 *escristien

nq.cuimment uncer evaluation is the Coaxial anc Triaxial instrwent Cable manufacturec ey ITT Surocenant Division.

This 6eole is 1ccatec in all areas of the plant, both inside and outUds containment, and will be evaluated for the worst case postulatec environment concitions insice containment.

The traceability of tne test cocumentation to the cable supplied by ITT for UEAC Specification 9763-006-113 19 is provided in referente 4 1.0 Conclus1Cn This equ:crent is qualified by sequential test for the postulated accicent temperature, pressure, numidity, chemical spray and radiation cose and by test supolemented by analysis for the requicec operating time.

This toutoment has a qualified life of 40 years at 167'F (75'C).

Therefore, this equipment is qualified to the requirements of NUREG-0588. Category !.

I 3.0 Limitations None.

4.0 Discussion Two specimens are tested in Reference 2.

These specimens are RG 11/U and RG-59/U coaxial.

Reference 4 states that these two specimens are representative of the four different types of cat,le'. suoplied to Seabrook as per Reference 1.

The supplied cables are RG-11 triaxial, and RG-11. RG 50 and RG-59 coaxial.

Tne insulation in these cables is cross linked polyethylene with i

an Exane jacket.

The limiting Environmental Zones for l

radiation are PB 15A, PB-4, PB 18 and PB-19.

There is no li Class 1E Electrical Equipment is Zones PB 4 anc P819 (Reference 8).

The qualified life of the caelt in Zones PB 15A and PB 18 (Radiation T!O 200 Mrads) is limited to 33.20,aars.

All mar 91ns suggested by !EEE 323 1974 nave eeen meet.

A vertical trav flame test nas been conducted in accordance with Section 2.5 of IEEE Standard 383 1974 (Reference 3. p. 2 Item 5),

6 l

11655 Page 1 of 1 i

4, a

,,,y,

.y e t men stasysn e s e guAt iIIUllom w

_ ORK SsertI W

r h44)

Preparedsy:[p/..f]

/[4 h g

EQulPMthI QUAliflCAIION FILL NO.

Ig.eparesDes<esyteen

' I._

183-19-03 Fa_rameter

.Festaleted fantronacat Cheded Sy:.

, [,.. *[I _

4 g

i Nr. nase ~~0s.Ifi E.:

~7

[

Talue,_

_ Eefere_nte Quellfled fewironacal

^

Date:

j 9163-0u6-18 3-19 I

' % 7 Hf,'aU;a ~T ista 2Tiiif

^

Value J

Operateeg i

l Beference l

Method I

Isme i

I Year l

3 i

l I lemspaces ID h (sl.:

4 1

-~

items

,1 tot-tat-6 ll l

p. I l lest and i

l I Tear l

p. 2 l Analyses i

l I

5 i

Peak I

l I kne l

t il Temperatore i

315 I_

8 ll (9)

p. I 190 2

l[

p. Il test hoe l

Peak Igwesm**e law:

il Pressmee l

3 l

Inst e namm at table il IPseg)

p. I l

511 I

p. Il I lest i

60 I

?

i ll I

N==teetwere:

Il l

I l

i bac l

ll Relattve l

4 III hp amant l

l 1

l I

ll Esmedsty 1

100 I

NdeI shade ll lt) i

/

I

p. I i

100 Ii I

RL-l a 1 ea s s a l. SG-i l. I I

' hoc I

p. 10 l lest tt& *At & RG-$9 (eassal Caentaal

\\

I r

l_. _

1 i

l Seric Atid Spray (pal) 1.21 bF 88 i

Sorse Acid i

2 l

I l

Aa a eest y: Spes : N/A

<l pet F.S to 10.$

I 1.11 by =t.

l P. ?

pH'80.5

p. 10 l lest Draum: N/A i

ll 40 Year Bernhal 6

I hone tediatsee Duse 2.0 m 108 I

l Rads)

p. 3 1.66 a 108 i

8amatseg Is esesneet:

ear Accidesd~

hete I 2

l Radiatsee Dese I

~

(Note 1)

p. C-2 I test Letetsen: tentas a

{t

p. 3 l

hoc lAll loses) ll Aging i

Rad leac; Pr emary Aes.

l

(*ffteass) 161/40 l

3 h

i 1

tidg. IPs-ISA. Ps-la) l (FS*C) 561/40 l

avse I

p. 2 (15801 l lest and 3

e

.-j

p. 2 l

4 luote 1) i 1 Analysss l

l I hae tourst flevatsen: hte I i

l i

1 IneedIc cI: sete 2

$wheergre(e l

abere flood level: Note 7 II/A 1

Note 8 i

N/A l

N/A N/A kne earetat ten Eeferesses:

l Ut K Deessag me.1163-t-100289 d

l l

Ecolsten 19 8Botes:

f r-312th?-0/. fl8L Repoet me. T-AS%0-8. Qualification T. Serette [nvironmental Chart. 9/1S/Mh.

W 304S4. lit to ufM. s/73/87in o $sentated $ team t see arcat med toss.ef.Coolaat-A((tdent En iests of Elec trital Cal,les 3

the Isott sag senes for sadsat sen ase Ps-tu v scament. 1/14/83.

and PS-18 utCI speestsaatsen he. 9163-0006-181-19. Set.

sense no elce te taal retungne atlanes PS-4 and P8-tapell tale mlatese E. 010-012 007 for Spesialty Cable. 9/?U/87 g

sa these areas. (Netearnie 1).es installed g

Scabeeva !. J. 8 s ie Ee.

19st-9/64P,. Ut 8('s let ter to Impell, aseted //l J/8$Ill-19-01. Assessment (het t le st. hte ll.

Isle of Ihe eable (sesadiated tothe qualsised 2 l

sa these spacs is Ismeted to l.a.b steads)

• Alu-94 "L 6. e4 84 Impell tessee tettes. *lloudeng Stasify N tees.*.

7.

Sulmers grae c qual e t se a t si.m s, not11./0 yeaes.

hime-e.p-J as a des::.tt et Dnsyn Sasa s E vent sb. s Sits-OJ/-af-l%, dated ?/7/36 Samanae3 el Class 11 1 (Ncicee-me c 9).

eequesed 1

quipment e

l 7

1 APPENDIE A j

b RILI. OF NATERIAL SEABB00E ETAT 1001 Uh!TS 1 & 2 I

srECIAs.TT CAs_tE l

I (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(S)

- (9)

(10) statsnas TTrt Ovta&LI.

rn ancTOR SNIELB PUaCHASE ITEM CABLE CARLE CONa#CTOR JACKET SIZE AMC IRWIBER TYPE Oa0ER QTV-CABI.E seo. WOLT&CE (FMWCTIOu) rne ne C ot D _R (STRAtls) rnmancTORS (CovtRAM )

FEET CODE j

f.

I.

2584 wde Trissial N/A and

1. 18 (7m) 1 Braid 25,000 UART (9ot Nia.)

(ac-II, 2.

2508 vec Triasial M/A tait te

1. 18 (7a) 1

- Braid 25,000 IAA27 (101 Min.)

(ac-II, 3.

2500 vde Trianist N/A Blue '*

f18 (7a) i Braid 7,000 UA1T (98I Min.)

(ac-33, 4.

2548 vec Trissial N/.

Yellow

1. 18 (7a) 1 Braid 7,000 W

(901 Min.)

(DC-II.

5.

2S00 wdc Trisalal N/A Slack With f18 (7a)

I Braid 60,000 3467 (ac-II, Bad Trace (981 Min.)

6.

2588 vec Cassiat M/A Stack With

1. 18 (7m) 1 Braid 5,000 TA67 (90Z Nim.)

(ac-II, Bad Trace 7gg 7.

Itse wac Caamial M/A Black Mith

1. 21 (19a)

I traid 60,000 TA6Y-(ac-SS, and Trace (981 min.)

] g *k S.

1000 wac Camaist M/A Bad

1. 24 (Fa)

I scaid 5,000 Taty (951 Min.)

g,.,

,E.gg (ac-59, 9.

1988 wac Coastal st/A tait ta

1. 24 (7m)

I staid 5,000 TA2r (951 Nin.)

(ac-59, N

o*

10.

3000 wac Cassial at/A Bisch With

1. 24 (7m) 1 Scaid 5,000 TA60 L.

(ac-59 Bad Trace (951 Min.)

\\*'

8 S h e

ID u l'

i.

g

• N y

t

.e,

Q^* C ll$-l;.

h d,. i I

I pyRCHA3E ORDER 1

7g;g 46)$

tut C.ct. =p rgt wwst...t. f I

I N m h u.a en inee m

=. *. oi ct, i..-.C.i.l..;*. tg.cinct.=cgi.

. e ae.

a c : ~ *. C a creu m ac 5'.~rt-74.-

4t October 7. ;93:

P. C. NO* 9 75 3.006 * * :-

c.,...

w..a ;;u.a a w aMisun ec 4.

.,;;;,' ':.'.. ~.;'.. 9:.. '.'.* * * '

l c/o United Insiseers & Constructors *.sc. Agents

.,. i...u n..:.r...... n g Post Cffice son 700 Foot of fue Sox 700 t Seabruck. New Maneshire 038;;

euecwasta saatreak. New van.,scire ::

Jase..eg=

j

.u :s uts.o einu u e. ::

3. i. n

.-$upranant Division "e*t B t.4*t t el 6 4 8.8 't a l'e l

'S *** **o **.-

et ti '

I ;;7:

...o..'g l'ht

• C w

=o 13819

$terliss Strset

.: ee: :::

l1

,,m Clinton, Ma s s e chus ett s 01513 SELLt4

"'" 8 * :A*8

• • • • Ct' ":c.'tw

,,3 e.

s. J.Mo rris i s t"

wA CONSIGN TO Fusite serv 1.ca conpaar of m dan;s...

' Motor Traight clo United Engineers & Constructors Seabrook Statics g,,(.g)j Seabrook Nw Hantshira 031*a

• teus not thirtv 00) dava.

pets 9/11/82" a.

...............u..

, n t s',av

.......s..

..............e..

....s...........................

set'

..M. 0.. !

.............a

,i..a i o s s c o e.fio =

I g et sunsees e o e.

. Job Site.

57tCT.AL T CABLE i

l

{ Ossign furnish fabricate, test and deliver 1 Let of Special Cable l

1s accordnace with the following documents:

l A i spectf u ation No. 9763.006-113-19 dated September 20. 1982 consistis r of Cover Page. Table of Contents, ninetesa (19) reproduced tnevritten

! pages. Tigste 1. three (3) pages of Appendix A. and three (3) pages of j Appendix 3, attached hereto and sade a part hereof.

l I

I 5.

Spectf ustion No. 9 763-QAS-3. Qua'ity Assurance A4ministrative and i

' System Requirements. For Safety Related Electrical 14uipsant. Revision 7 l dated Aprti 11. 1979, consisting of Cover. Table of Contents. Current Fase 11.st23. :dentif ttation of Changes, and thirty-nise (39) reproduced t7pe-5 vrittes pages, already in your possession and made a part hereof.

C. ' Spectfuation No. 9763-tQ-1. Class II Equipseat Qualification Requirements.1 j

Revisies 7. dated Tabruary it.1976, cosaLattag of Cover. Table of

, Contents, tea (10) reproduced typewritten pages and casa to be submitted with Proposal. consistist of evo (2) reproduced typewritten pages.

l

. nuatored 31 and D2, already La your possession and made a part hereof.

j i

I

. PR:**NC:

OTAf, TUM DE:.:7 IRED FR:03...... '. $*.30. 3 6 3.

i i

I ti CUA.'t?; T Ot3CR:F": M PR:C!/My""

II"tN 5 * :'8 1.

23 GCC ft.

7A1! Triam M-11 Red

$810.C0 3 10.230.00 j 23.000 ft.

CA27 Trtax M-11 'Jhit s

$810.00

$.0. 30 40 l l

3.

7.000 ft.

CA3; Trd.4x M-11 Ilue 8810.00

$ 3.$ 70 40 -

6 7.0C0 ft.

CA47 Trias M-11 Te11ev

$410.00 s 3.67040

(. )

3.

60.000 ft.

VA6; Trias M-11 Staex/ Rad $810.00

$ =8.600 40

}

Cent uued I

................. "..............". " =* " o A.

~

pumcHASE ORDER lI.. ese t

.w w e r e wu s....

Tors 4.';16 j

s w.t.v d e,ngineers j 0 m'.'.'..!!'."r!.7.'tJ tnie

• c-se i sn.-

.m P. C. NC. 9 ;5 3.00 6.1

• • • t cessber 7 ;91 j

p'.*31:: 5 U.7*.:I C*MFANT Cf NI*.' EAMF$3:3.1 e ai c/a United Esgtseers 6 Constructers Inc. Agents

. wa'as t.c etss e ::.i.e s'ses c I

suecwastm!

:.Su,re==t :tv1.t.n re,.,. r t.:'. =,.:1.,t.:v it.c,i raio 2 =f ' i

==ris t s=.: ::.i m s I

e s. een ::::

...u..

wa.act...n.:

i

.:.o l

sELLgg

.f'.

8. ".A&4 cg.-

l S a'i' WA CONSIGN TO c e i.a s

e....................................

... i s

.s...............e................-.........,.

~no e.

ec t.

oasesi.eio l

...c a g,,...

rgtM CUAN; T 013 07.:y*!CN.

PRICT/vP EXTUS:0N 6.~

10.000 ft.

36T Co u RG-11 Black / Rad $755.00

$ 7.350.00

' 7 60.000 f. 36T Coax W 58 Black / Rad $2!0.00

$ 15.0C0.00 l s.

3.000 ft.

u.tf Coax W 59 Rad

$225.00

$ 1.125.00 l

9.

5,000 ft.

• A.2T Co u W59 '.' hit e

$225.00

$ 1.125.00 10.

5.000 ft.

36U Coax W 59 Black / Rad $225.00

$ 1.125.00 Presims Price - 7endor to earpedite delivery to October 8. 1982.

' : Di QUA C:'"?

DE3CRI?* 0N FRDC*M 5.

23.000 ft.

CA6;

• rims W 11 Black / Rad 1 6.000.00 7:ises are firm for dalisery through January 14. 1985.

l

.T U.'t3 OT PAT'T C l La tan (,10)/ not shif t7 (30) days.

{

$71C*A:. CONDITIOMS - Tors No. 9763-4224 Raytsed May 20, 1981 consi.s ting of Cover Fage. Table of Contents and tventy (20) reproduaed typovritten j

pagne La attached hereto and made a part hereof.

i I

0A'**xC!t

, 's accortance with Article 9 of $pecial canditions Tors 9763-4224 for a I

! periad of one (1) year fits date of cosmer:14.1 operation.

l 6

i i ho (2) unprised copies of outside Purchase Orders are to be submitted t

ta the attention of Mr. 3. E. McCaig. Ma ager - tapetistsg.

i I

Fancy progrees sharts outlisist engtseering. purchasias production

. aat delivery status vi'.1 he aussisted starting August 23.198.

~#**

~

-a,...

.Vi

BERGERON AFFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT D EXCERPTS FROM FSAR CONTENTS FSAR Pg. 8.3-39 8.3-40 8.3-40a 8.3-41 8.3-52 8.3-53 8.3-54 FSAR Fig. 3.11(B)-1, Sh. 1

-1, Sh. 2

-1, Sh. 3

-1, Sh. 4

-1, Sh. 5 l

t

\\

SB 1 & 2 Amenc ent $$

FSAR July 1985 g.3.t.3 Physical Identification of Safety-Related Equipment All esbles. "Iceways and safety-related equipment are assigned to a particular channel or train.

There are two redundant trains of power and controls, and four redundant c*annels of instrumentation.

Each channel or train is assigned a particular color, as shown belows i

Equipment Raceway separation Creup Nameplate Tag Cable Color A.

Channel 1 and Train A Red Rad Red Train A Associated Black Black w/ Red Tracer

{

B.

Channel !! and Train 5 White White White Train 8 Associated Black Black w/ White Tracer l 9

C.

Channel !!!

Blue Blue Blue D.

Channel IV Yellow Yellow Yellow it Each piece of electrical equipment is marked with the node number indicated on the design drawings, in the particular color corresponding to the channel or train to which that equipment is assigned.

Jimilarly, trays and exposed conduits are marked with color-coded markers. The cable jacket color code serves as its identification.

The operator or saintenance craf tsman needs only to observe the color of the nameplate of any piece of equipment or the cable jacket color to determine which channel or train it serves.

For exceptions to the above cable and raceway identification criteria, see subsection 8.3.1.4.k.

If 9.3.1.4 Independence of Redundant Oystess 4.

General The Seabrook Station complies with the requirements of TSAA Appendix 8A, IEEE 384-1974 and Regulatory Guide 1.75. Rev. 2.

These documents describe acceptable methods of complying eith IEEE l

279-197' and Criteria 3.17 and 21 of Appendix A to 10 CTR Part $0 l

with rsee..t to the physical independence of the circuits and I

electrical equipment comprising or associated with the Class lE l

power systes, the protection systes, systess actuated or controlled I

by the

• otection systes, and auxiliary or supporting systess that must be operable for the protection systen and the systess it actuates to perform their saf ety-related functions.

Pr e s e rva tion of independence of redundant systems within the control boards and all other field sounted racks is discussed in Subsection 7.1.2.2.

it 9.3-39

SB 1 6 2 As:ndacnt $9 FSAR

.g;7 1986 S.3.1.4 Indecendence of Redundant Systems a.

General The Seabrook Station complies with the requirements of FSAR Appendix 3A. IE!! 384-1974 and Regulatory Guide 1.75. Rev. 2.

These documents describe acceptable methods of complying with IEEE 279-1971 and Criteria 3.17 and 21 of Appendix A to 10 CFR part 50 with respect to the physical independence of the circuits and electrical quipment comprising or associated with the Class !!

power systes. the protection systes, systems actuated of controlled by the protectior. system, and auxiliary or supporting systems that must be optrable for the protection systes and the systems it actuates to perform their saf ety-related functions.

Pre s e rvation of independence of redundant systems within the control boards and all other field mounted racks is discussed in Subsection 7 1.2.2.

In accordance with the provisions of Section 4.$a and 4.6.1 of FSAR Appendix 8A, Sections 4.$(1) and 4.6.1 of IEEE 364-1974, and Position C4 of Regulatory Guide 1.75,. Revision 2, we have elected to associate all of the Non-Class 1E circuits with Class 1E circuits. This application of atsociated circuits allows the plant to be designed with one less separation group; that is, instead of having five separation groups consisting of four safety-related separation groups and one non-safety-related separation group, Seabrook has only four separation groups. The major advantages of this approach are the ability to provide graster separation distances between the groups, as well as to reduce the raceway i

syste,s's exposure to fire.

As a result of this design, all plant circuits are specifically l

assigned to one of the following four separation groups as noted in Figure 8.3-57:

Croup A - Train A, Channel I and Train A Associated Circuits Group 5 - Train 8, Channel II and Train 5 Associated Circuits Group C - Channel III Croup D - Channel IV The great majority of associated circuits are with Group A, a very limited number are with Group 5, and none are with Groups C and D.

The circuits that are associated with Train A consist of t l

I 1)

Non-Class 1E power, control, instrument circuits contained l

within the Nuclear Island.

l 2)

Non-Class 1E power, control, and instrumentation circuits that traverse the Nuclear Island boundary.

3)

Non-Class 1E power, control, and instrument circuits outside the Nuclear Island.

4? 54 S.3-40

SB1&2

.e. sad-ent $9 TSAR

.uy !)36 l

The circuits that are associated with Train 8 consist of:

1)

Non-Class 1E power. control, and instrument circuits contained i

within the Nuclear Island.

2)

Non-Class it power, control, and instrumentation cir:uits

{

that traverse the Nuclear Island boundary.

g The Nuclear Island boundary is shown in Tigure 8.3-58.

This figure denotes the buildings, structures, duct banks, etc., which are part of the Nuclear Island. All other buildings, structures, etc.,

are considered to be outside the Nuclear Island.

C The f our separation groups are routed through four separate raceway systems per the separation criteria given in Table 8.3-10.

This separation criteris are based on a cos'aination of the following:

I 1)

Standard separation criteria given in Sections 5.1.3, l

5.1.4, and 5.6 of TSAR Appendia $A and IEEE 384-1974 and l

2)

Separation criteria established by analysis and testing as permitted aby Sections 3.1.1.2 and 5.6 of TSAR Appendix $A and IEEE 384-1974.

This analysis and testing are documented in References (4) and (2) (see TSAR Sociton 8.3.4).

$6 8.3-40s

SB1&2 Amandcont 52 FSAR Dece;be r 1983 The following analysis examines the design features and modes of f ailure of associated circuits of each separation group to determine any interaction and challenges with other separation groups. The overall objective is to assure that the ability to ar.hieve a safe plant shutdown under design besis event (DBE) conditions is not compromised.

b.

Train A Associated Circuit Ana lys i s 1.

Associated Circuits Contained within the Nuclear Island Non-Class lE circuits that remain within the Nuclear Island are permitted to share the same raceway as Train A Class lE circuits. These circuits are cisesified as Train A Associated Circuits and are designed and installed to meet all the require-ments placed on associated circuits as required by the compli-ance documents listed earlier.

Challenges to Class lE circuits, because of failure in an associated circuit, have been examined and determined to have no detrimental effect because:

(a) When Class lE power supplies are utilised, f ailure of a Non-Class lE notor, load, or device connected to this powe supply will be promptly isolated by operation of Class E protective de. vices.

Non-Class IE loads connected to Class 1E buses are in all cases protected by Class 1E devices. The breakers protecting Non-Class it loads are coordinated such that f ailure of all Non-Class lE loads, with proper operation I

of their own breakers, will not re sult in tripping of the incoming breaker to the bus.

Further, in the few cases where credit is taken for the incoming bus feeder breaker to provide backup protection to meet Regulatory Guide 1.63, the associated bus is dedicated to Non-Class 1E loads only sed, therefore, will not degrade a Class 1E bus.

(b)

In cases wht e Non-Class 12 power supplies, such as switchgear, wotor control centers, and distribution l

panels are utill ed, the's are of identical design of the Class lE counterparts and have been purchased to the same specification requirements inclusive of quality control.

Mounting of the Non-Class 1E power supplies within the Nuclear Island is identical to the mounting of their Class 1E counterpartel therefore, credit can be -

taken for this equipment to function under DBE conditions, it i

l l

8.3-41

(

$$1&2 A.'e n d me n t is FSAR November 1985 Penetrations for 600 volt service and below are modular type with a header plate welded to the outside of a 12 inch containment sleeve.

Because of the concern regarding leakage currents of terminal blocks during accident conditions, low level instrumentation circuit con-ductors inside containment are connected to the penetration conductors with qualified splices.

Safety-related 480 vote power, 120 vote ac and 125 voit de control circuit conductors inside containment required to function for LOCA and main steam line break conditions are also connected to the penetration conductors with qualified splices. The balance of medius power 480 volt conductors, and control and instrumentation conductors are terminated on terminal 6

blocks inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment.

480 volt heavy power conductors are terminated with lugs on special termination plates inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment. Nuclear instrumentation detector circuits are terst-nated with connectors inside terminal boxes both inside and outsius c ont a i nment.

Penetrations for medium voltage have header plates welded to the outside of an 18 inch containment sleeve.

Each pene-tration consists of three 1000 MCM conductors terminated with premolded stress cones inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment.

The capability of the electrical penetrations to withstan'd the total range of time versus fault current without lois of containment integrity under worst case environmental conditions was demonstrated by test.

These test results are summarized in the response to RAI 430.56.

r.

The penetrations are arranged in two levels, with one power train and two channels entering above the intermediate floor of the con-tainment building, and the redundant train and two channels entering below the intermediate floor. Once inside the containment, this floor provides the necessary physical separation and protection between the redundant trains; outside the containment, this separa-tion is continued by separate tunnels connecting the penetration area to the switchgear and cable spreading areas of the control building.

Penetration conductors are siaed using ICEA guidelines with an j

additivnal restriction of a 650C ambient temperature.

l St The design, construction, and installation of the penetration assemblies are in accordance with IEEE 317 and Regulatory Guide 1.63.

(See Subsections 8.1.5.3. 8.3.1.1 and 6.3.1.2 for further details on compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.63).

k.

Cable and' Raceway Identification 4

The computerized conduit and cable schedule provides a permanent record of the routing and termination of cables.

Circuit level coding identifies the individual channel or train assigned to each raceway and cable. These data are entered into the conduit and cable progras, which in turn produces reports designating the unique number with origin destination, channel or train, and specific path for every cable.

Every cable is identified by a tag affixed at each end. bearing the unique cable n.mber.

8.3-52

33 1 5:

.Vens.ent b FSAR Novembor M85 Each channel or train is assigned a particular r.olor, as described in Subsection 8.3.1.3.

All safety-related cables have jackets of the color assigned to the particular channel and train so there is no dtfficulty in dis-ttnguishing between cables of redundant channels. Non-safety related cables are associated with either Train A or 5 and have black jackets with a red trace for cables associated with Train A and a white trace for cables associated with Train B.

It is i:unediately evident to the operator or maintenance rean, by observing the color of the cable jacket, that a given cable is safety-related M and that it is a particular channel or train. This systen also prevents placing a cable of one channel or train with cables of another, by the obvious dissimilarity of jacket color.

Each cable is further identified by a footage and cable code on the jacket of the cable at intervals of approximately five feet.

Reference to pulling records reveals the cable number, routing, separation, circuit type, and use of any cable at any accessible point in the raceway system where the footage marker and cable code can be identified.

L Exceptions to the above cable identification criteria exist for vendor supplied speciality cables for radiation sonitoring systes and portions of various other systems (for example telephone system, lighting and fire protection / detection). For these exceptions the necessary information to ensure adequate control of separation.

installation, inspection, etc. is provided in the construction documents.

/M Raceways which are part of the computerized cable and conduit schedule are marked to identify their number and circuit level.

Conduit raceways are identified at each end where conduit terminates and at both sides of walls, floors and in-line boxes. Tray raceway markers are spaced at 15 foot or less intervals. These markings are in the same colors assigned to the channels and trains. For example, a raceway with a red section marking is utilized only by cables with red (or black with red tracer) jackets. Hence. it is readily apparent that a given cable is routed with its respective channel.

Raceways which are not part of the computerited conduit and cable schedule may not be marked with a unique identification number.

but their function is obvious by tracing the raceway to its and device. These raceways may be used to carry vendor supplied speciality cables for radiation monitoring system and portions of various other systems such as telephone system, lighting and fire protection / detection.

For these racewsys, the necessary infor-mation to ensure adequate controls of separation, installation.

inspection, etc. is provided in the construction documents.

e Since, in general, there is no shating of safety-related tyste:=

between the two units (see discussion of compliance to CDC 5.

Subsection 8.3.1.2), there is no need to distinguish the safety-related cables of one unit frem the safety-related cables of the 3.3-53

55 i i Anend.e-: t!

FSAR July 1935 other unit.

As such, the cable and raceway coloring scheme is identical for the two units.

in the common areas, the unit to which a cable belongs is not apparent from the raceway or cable markings.

If it is required to know the unit to which a cable belongs, it can be obtained by observing the equipment designation number. which has the unit number as a prefix. The basis for cable and raceway identification is to distinguish between redundant channels, indicate which channel is involved, and which cables are safety-related.

I 1.

Administrative Responsibility and Control 1,

Administrative responsibility for assuring cospliance with appli-cable design criteria and bases relative to independence of redundant systens rests with the A/E's Project Electrical Engineer. He is responsible for coordination with the A/E's field electrical super-visor to verify that the independence separation and availability of Class 1E equipment is preserved during installation of the electric power system.

The following control procedures are established by the A/E's Project Electrical Engineer to assure compliance of the electric power system with the design criteria and bases:

1.

Periodic design reviews with the cognizant engineer, the design supervisor, and the resiewing engineer to assure the criteria are being interpreted and followed, i

2.

Issuance of periodic administrative and design direc;ives covering procedures, and 3.

Periodic field reviews at the job site by the Project Electrical Engineer and/or the cognizant engineer to check field installation procedures, to provide interpretation of design drawings and guidance for solution of field installation problems, and to verify compliance with criteria.

The design of the conduit and raceway systen is guided by the recommendations of applicable TEEE, ICEA and NEC standards. For I

ik instance, the limiting percentages of fill of internal area of the various eine conduits or cable trays are fixed in one of the input forse of the computer conduit and cable schedule and these limits are automatically applied to all conduits and cable trays by the computer.

If the conduit or cable tray is one which the computer is free to site, it designates the site which accommodates the cables to be enclosed.

If the conduit or cable tray size is designer-designated and the fill exceeds the limiting percentage, the comput6r indicates an error message so that either the conduit can be made a larger size, or the cables routed by another path.

By these methods, all raceways are assured of being of adequate capacity.

Correct installation practice assures that the design criteria by which the equipment was selected are not violated auring construc-tion.

installation bases are prescribed, where necessary, by the 9.3-5a

w - =.

i y

v use a,

JW.,

"E'V*

";,T.5"

"'* V'""

".T J

't,'I,*f'

'"'W"'"

n*

n-e ns u.

a4 N "'

0

.m se e.

e.

m e.

se @

me me me me a%. ee.

a u

a a

=

e u

u u

u as t a ts @

e4 La @

ee u @

Nu@

Nu O

_e mae e

e.

==

s.an..z =

m a

u u

u u

'v

_m.wa 9

9 g

g e.u.O iY *.':

w;. ".

e

s.

A A

e c

C i'

n, O

awe in' s

...... - u mes

]

...... ma e.

A;3

, = =,

i

_. mum e

/

s

~

s

' ~ ~... * *.

s j

/y N/

g

//[

N 7

' W l

. ~.

'.'s 6.u

. i 6.u v 6 6 464=< i 6 4. v e 6 4. v e aiume 6 s eu=4 iis t

i.A.a.

. i.,

..tr.

n i..i

..ia s me swi seg'edE 1 @i my e m 0

3 p1 4

3 en I

g

--yee

....... ma e-un

/

.r4 __1 3

r t

~.

.o

.I

-.ta,'

g

.in

,o m

3 ll./ %-d l %-S k.

Q

/ ~

l a

i

+

x~.

we I. i 6 4 6.= v i 6 4..

< # 6 4 6.@v, e 6.u,.<

6 s e u e 4 $ 6 6.

< e,3 4 6.

< # 3,.

l

2. -u

..us

.u.

iau a..

.,s a 94480 1W @

e.'==Qg a w. a.mn l

l l

i

i

'llj

?ll I

l 4a~y4M 2>.

~

i y li f.

W "1:l f

P,5 hd i:.,

I a

tj 2

e I.

i g;.

l

[

l-l 1

i i

l n:

l i

8 8

8 z

~-

• e t

,e

=e i

s I

8 8

• e t.

se ns r

I a.

.s_

' O' o

s 4

i f

i

!e

'e

'3e s

i

• ,s n

~

~

i a! 1v.

!1 3

s 3

e e

e e

tri.

1 f'

,i 04 bg:,l1mi.;rB M9,t. ;i1r a;:!,.-

!oI N. g,i!

u,n !;

[

i l

r

e,i;yf f,3:n h%g!@ ;s r

it a-i

,fp,e. uPe,-

i i j

l l:

l l'prI, !,

n fn. L!' I' l

h;!,:

L9w$,[

!5ea j

' r

!";<R.cy

• s,py!

j t;

I!ug{

" 3h f f 'S h

y' imd?;,-

s

$N p

k ;,.9. a l5.1!V ' sj i

i sc.: i i i

ig f,,! l

• I i

t i!

l.

, j i

s

$i$jwV'%!d[ g 1#l 1;

n(pJ:

l l: e.,

j I.r f.

hg,,ie L.

i,i=!.

sg f

'l ! 5 y3F.lE i ia Wd:,

s.=js.

a p

t j

[',. r g 1 1

t !

f I 'i

!5{ s ls i

n tl ib h. :n $ i N !.

_h !g ns ! '(;:f

,r eg

i i: i. 3 I.

ig i i,3

y,..g ! E' I,

$l !,1p dj n!

8i!

f r;)

i p

,)

f s !Fl I N.,,c.iyg,

,i j af n j

• A': n ; I !

i I

s;I I li j

I i

l h.l l.. l j

i i,i r!lI

.I

!p.

hj!.

! r u e l.

=, i i

! s tyL I

.1

n h!t$'%,nh I

Iy:

!I

!.s,

ii I

6pf u:o

!, I 0! I j

n!

I.;

f:

r *i.ch.8

.$;.tgy 5po!%f a $ 5,c 1

• s.

h j

t U;?,;

(

$ijn,i

! a,,ms!

3 i e.

.i l'i, t

m~

.;$la,,i:if

i j

4gs WMw s

I

!$[*,ll e! f u<x~e

$ t,l i,

ti!

.h! sg T

('rildYI j 5w.5"4ay lql

< g =e G9

, ! !.inll l

I a

- i od j,5 zy k>. om En f2$iY E

E" g 1 s 5 E 5un i g :. o 5 j ~

E n

Zy;>a5e$~

g e g : 5 =_ 5 -

i i,

1

,l I

t

.aa

,g,g m' nw.

.a n==

.u,m,

=;,p g*.

m<

m.e n..,

nu

-i

-i i

sauca.. -

=

m

=

m m

.e s.a..=. - =

_u w.

u

.m

.u.

wm wm

~.

s.e.n cae.,

.u u..'

.. J u.J

,. s u.i

.. J

= @

u

= ;g,t m='a

..q

-. ~..

s u..

p,

-.4

=--

4@

.g w...n..

e

$hi rw g1

""_5og.

u.

w.

w..

w.

5.*H.

n.1 e.M w'>

m m

w..,,

• 'aa 'u u..'

e./

u.

se u

u.,

4 m..

m..

_i

.a..~

~.

_i m...,

~,

m..n..

.g mm e-

~

-~

u,..

s u.

i

.e.a

+m- =

.. /

.. /

.-. a u

u.,

.A,

.-.m..

n.@

o.@

c.@

c..

~,

_,c..,

t x m..

c

.e l

s.w. e=

~~

~

.~ ~

u.

u 1

w.

r.2 e

et l

's.

.. /

.. /

n-a

.= e i

l ve. n m.

1 l

l SI l

APERTURF.

..'....,5..

i I

CARD

/

Also Available on Aperture Carti o-

M rdment 59 May 1986 71 u.,.

.+

s

... = = =

e m..

=.%

.+

+

r mk,

n.<

m.

n, ns n.

=-,

i.m..

= _,

m....s--

=

m m

m

.e

.e

.e

= -.

o um u

s-.

u u

_o s..

-i u.

=

=_

=

i asY.

u..'

s.. J

.. /

u..'

.. /

u./

.. /

u..'

.. /

.a ser

.n...

= =. ' '

........u w

g

~.+

m...

.+

m,.,

)

... g

..g.

. =...

, c,

~

~.,

c...

.i

.e

.e

.e

"_Y1 '

• • f *

"Y_ '

eer e=v n.m.

i b,g Mg

--'--T' u

...i

...g ug

...w.==

n.

~.

.+

)

ar @

c....

~

c..,

, a...

~

.m...

a..

=

.e

.e i

.. s

.. /

\\

.. /

., J F

I f

Pf

.f PF

.. (i)

.i(()

~

= _......

.m.,

._m.-

._~

c.)

.. /

.. /

I VC. ut' VU. ut' h M lo M.03 I

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l

9763 F.300219 FIGURE 3.11(B).l. 5H. 2

,i l

u mi..a.M..

se tp.,.e.

a.

.aS,

h

4..,.

=Es.a

.. ~.

u

.m..

nu.

~i

.x~

i c m...

.%i cn.. i m,

co. 1 m _,.%

a w n..

..b.s.,te u

s 2.a

.....=u

,,j

,,g

,,j

,,j

== G e

e s

T Y

u

.=

.u.

a.,.,.

u..

am.

. e

_m.,,...a.

.~ i

.i o n.-

.1

.~i c a..

.w.,

w. i v r,. i

.%e 3

m 484. *M.

u

. - =

g,'at.. )

EM.M.)

r 6

. - m.

~

c e.r; eu-ec i

3

?*4"* ' * *a.6 aJ u..'

e..'

u..'

u..'

=. G e

e a

u u..

.. L. mn

....,n

.4

. ~.*..

. s e.

w

= a.

1..e. C.:t m. i

=*,i-.3 i

r n..

a.

r o n.'

.* i

, HE".

Jw s 2 n.'.n...

e.

k e L.

m..m =em

.ga.Li

.a..

w.u e.r) s2 t

i i

i -

' ' e *.

../

.. /

.2..

• =. "

..e u..

n,.,

-.n -.

-s.

.m.

l s.r.

... m mi

.,.,.w

.-~c c...

. ~o

.i

.m.. i e

1.n

n..

m o

n.

~.

2 e

, i _

."...c.m...

.e e

SI

APERTURE,

..~. _ _. _ -

..n..

..o...

(.,, A }< j.)

... me -.. m. m.. -..

Aho Mailable On Aperture Card

Amendment 59

._ MaY 1986 w.m maa E.(s a.

g d..

p.t t.a

.p.g.cg.

.ca 6

t t i.

. 1..e

...g.

97 f p.g gF.t (. W.

nf.e 67 Y

1. % Y 7% +

hm e

)f

=t

.e s

-e

.e.

i c.i.' i

.%I eL~ik_ i cu.' i

=%

63.s i.c a.' i hs!

. >=%

i ca. i

.a.= r.><%

i ca.' i.%iT8%=i c a.'

4%1

..=%

i

.: to-

.4

.9 7

.e e.

.t et.

M o

u u

s.=

u

.ua.. >

c...

ar-

.,r.

s. w..

sw m

.w..

u u

sw sw..

~

s w..

s..

c. u

=

e=r. i u s..

u.

u s..

es t

e a

e.

e T

-u M. ~

• • "a uIE'*"

u..n,., a u a g. t 6t.

.gi,.n : un s%.,ge.

s.

. g* ****

=~

.c f

1 c:r<.

.gJ.% i

.o ro, i

. s i 1, s i. u _ i.. *gd..Cm.'astGr:o.i

.sg. w..s i.u.-

.... g. u. -

.6

.i e

n ii.

n se p.

.s e.

u u

. : e..u w v.. 3

.n

.u s.

s w.,

sp gg,

sw.,

i.-

t.

a4 se..

s..,

s_.

.s ss

.s sw.,

t'la.g

~

e.

C L.

YJ"*U u

i i

i Li s..

b..s ps is.

64 0.

f..

- 1 4

8

6. t.

I.8.

Is

8. I. i S

4 j T

..,,w.-.

.c

..,f

-Y

...f 4,.4 ri e.

2 c u.-

.%i

. a us.F_I?_a.u m % 1cu.'i

-~.'. *i.

.i.%.

. x.ur n-, i 1.n..-

r.- c. i

.-i eu i l.

l e.

.i u

=

m se m

hj.. I s.

s.

u sw m s.

s s.

e s.

z. w..

s.w. s sw.

w..

u=.u u

=

i us s

u us ei o.

u..

l a

e e

a e

e l

...u

,P F4 444 P.

Pf

..i

~ -.

..i

n. g 1 < e.. :lw-m%

e t i.un.-

.g.mu.o.-

.~ m

ar

.~_ug,

. m.,.

r i.n c..

.~7

.% i c a..

o w...

w....

w.u siw z w.,

s i-m

..=

(w w s.

sw.,

sw.,

sw.,

s w.,

.4 s..

~

v..u

.u v.u a... s u.u u.u i

g in.'.

H.i o

3384\\4 COL,(.ci PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION. UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 9763 F 300219 FIGURE 3.11(B).1, SH. 3

e

,r--

T Y

uG

• * *. =,

M.f.y4 1 A '.

C.

A '.

.*A.M G.E e&f pyf e.p g

.ep

&q def * -F M e p a.-m e

s. e e e,* g see 6 a.-i e i.-. G

-e e-m 1 i.u-n. em.1 .e-i.u-r. -i i e-,. e- -- i es.& > .e-em, <=.1 r

e. i <ta..

O e. Se se e. e se se to es e. se e. es se e. es n == .4 to to to to to O O == 448 688 .= WB == WS a. WO WB e. Red e*e == tes' We a test El test 68 == heat es == hemt as T ed We == == t-es == == t oe G4 == ted et == h-44 =. ked et = 0 M N H H H N H M H N M H l' s s s s gue, f 7 e i e J )se tr e e av e se e n av s e see tr e e ise ei n e sto st e e .se e se e I e e e e j 1 IL8tter. h.se64 36ssw..te.a.tm. e.as { t w$ M'**'****'** pj) .em r s"$)

e.

• s It n II-81-4 40 ts 4t M t v-se i-r

. et. F .am.m 1

s t'

.em.1 . seek i k ;ut.' esem I '. Emmet i .C =e' ees.h a 'M D t' i meBD.m 8 99 i.N.' 9 ee. A '8***A 1 E N.' 5 l O e. e o se e e a e a e. e. es se e a e e l l == 68 == m. te == as t$ em == te == 90 == le == 1 >= .e s-. .es. . - = t e = a-es sem es t e, 4 so, ma .=8 4J4" 8. k es' e t 4429 86 t est e t M e JW e. == == heat el g li E W 2 W 4 he 4 te to R De to .a.... u.:.. t t t t t 6 4 08 e == 4e e

• =

48 e == qe e == Ie e te e e 44 e A. I e f W to'en &&ase I cee ---.,.e ., e,s. i e le.p.e

see, lettu..e esse s

we =. P -e e-. mi. e == 3 m e. 4 co es @ .co t -i s : m.-

o. i - 1rar-tem =3 sese i cm..

.e. r .-i c a.- ~1 .e.e.s, x :u.- 6 m n a n n n n n n m m m o m m ( t .e. .e. .- a. L g = teme es == tem es k.sa aus m.e.on e m es. s e se.e es e g l i 5 ee => es as te es to te as es = w g 3 g 3 3 t te e a e t te e n 68 0 to e es e ..e '..e. j .e e. .eme.. ew ue em.e n.~ ...e. w. e: 9,,, m ( ..e e e.e e. .e 1 ~< ~i a.- ~ a.,, ~r ==m , w.. ~, ~ a.- ~, .s a.- ~; ~ .w.- m e. e. e. .e .e y e.... ca.r.a ... w e .e s-.. s-.. .~ s e.,.. e. r e.- e.. i i e.... 6-e j l- .. / ue .. / , e e' .. e' u.e i I Mo4 %CCM - n6 i i I PUBLIC5ERVICE COMP NY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION UNITS 1 & 2 k FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l 9763.F 300219 FIGU RE 2.11(B)-1. 5H. 4 I l q is 4 t ~, i i i i pgg%,Q7%g as statt C00L986 TOcta tutDNC (#.L "^a*

• c,'#..M

• T3".QTclat's W..".". ""'"$""'

tuveonestwt&L WPA-4 @ naja t @ C1*l @ CT 6 @ 20 4 concifsom sewww t seJaug e womuat i soonisA e frietaatuntf m asannam 172 C4 04 C4 emeam $0 +0 0@ 0@ Pat 1SLM F5CJ ^ esAnnam StcMT Pos 0 0 0 NomsAL 5tcMT PCS 0 0 0 Qeam 0 0 0 0 MLaa0TV C3 e 60 60 60 ) tsaxaam @ isaam 3 1 M M R&Oiaisner Eltati$1 edoms4L OfTICA&fia tee 3e g g gle g g gl e g,g ggg -e engg l e PtA MJCLlat OtSCPLNE Cs*A W.:4.4;O 4 F ety O.

• • PCA toCLlae CriCPted.att. M3a 4.434.10 t mtv 3t 4

i 1 i i p Amendment $9 May 1986 k.Hf b EL(CTRCat TLeeft wah ST(aw & Fttteat(R PPC Chatti s. 1 D17 M t CMa$( Ia1T PP( CMa$( taff PPT Cha$l f att Pet Cmasi i!CT80 CAL tmTCMCC AA ROCw$ (LtCTRCAL.g.Raf Ak(a StadotLL CatLt TLh c (LLC 1kCAL TAaf ARIA CLECTRcal laat anta gr.7 g 3'-7 4? 3 C' 3' 7 C1 73 O CT ft @ LT Sa @ Pcg.t @ P:t.t @ PCg.9 @ PCI-c @ sowat t Vhat e v*wu e own e ww a t a w:e wat i nGwn 4 04 e4 86 00 00 He 00 0@ 0@ M C@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0 0 SLCat Poi 5Lcmf P s 0 SLCat PCs 0 0 0 SLCm1 POS A cmt PO5 0 SLCx1 POS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Le to 43 30 30 20 10 30 30 3 30 30 30 30 38 3' 3 3' 3' 3 3' TIC it C lac' trC II C II C ' II C Sy

1t.

70s et.t.i at Cthtest =3t!! 5tt APERTURE se u - mn ve CAlu) & Asallable On Aperture Cagg % 204ldOO bl M Pyttt( $Etv1CE COY'ANY OF Ntw MAVP$NR[ 5t RV Cl INVIRONvtNT CH ART SEAT Roo< ST ATION.UN;T5 i & 2 FINAL 5AFITY AN ALYM AIPQAf 17633 300219 l fiGURt 3 It(8bt.5H 5 's i BERGERON AFFIDAVIT 1 ATTACHMENT E EXCERFT FRON ASLB HEARING TRANSCRIFT TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 CONTENTS Transcript pgs. 384-389 ) 4 i f 1 I ) 1 i i i ] ) 1 1 ) l 1 I l i l i 4 4* 6 Ms, 0* *?.A RN : I w:u.d lake to tur....:w -a. equ:pmen qualifiesti:n fa'.e N7. 113-20.';, an.:n : w:.'i 2 ask the rep::te: to mark f:: identif :ation purposes as Ixhibit 5. (The d::u.ent referred to was , g markedMICMP gxhidi $ g:: 6 identification.) 1

SD:X MS. CURRAN:

Do you have a c:py of that, t Mr. Woodward? g i WITNESS WOOCWAre: Yes, I do. 4 to BY MS. CU"RAN: 11 Q Acc:reling to Applicant's testim ny at page ?, J this is one of the pieces of equipment that is not qualified for 100 days. Am correct? i A (Watness Salve) That is correct. 15 C This piece of equip.ent is qualified for - 16 least not f or all parameters -- this piece of equip ent U a I s qualified fer 30 submergence, an I correct? 1e ) j A (Witness Woodward) Yes, that is cc rect. H l i Q Would you please describe the location and the to use of this cable at the Seabrook plant? l 21 I i A This cable is 300 volt instrument cable that g 22 \\ can be found anywhere in the plant. With respect to all l 23 > l specific applicati ns, I c:uldn't answer that questien. 24 O But it is p:ssible, as it not, that this :s:.e 25 i I I t 4 :. 7-7 1 20;;11es ele::ricity to instru:ents that would say sh:w ( 2; the co.a.diti:.s Of a::idents a t t h e -l a n t a rid........-...e r 3 arious parameters associated with ac:1 dents at the p;a..:? 4 A

is'possible, yes.

i E..d 3 :.m I L ] 3.:a f:is i 4 l 7 f e j i \\ e 10 l i t 1 11 l ? 12 j i 13 [ i !k Y l 18 [ d I i 16 b S l i q t-

• i D

i, l-, 21 1i ,i 'k l I I> 23 t t Ik I i n,' I i I I t l l, l .l i i i I - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ I 386 t ..sueW tl Q Now, a:cerding to Page 7 of the qualift:stien i, 2 il report review checklist, this test program doesn't in:1ude I 3) sabrergence tests. And, their checklist refers to Note 9 4 f:: an explanation of that, l;e 3* I would like to turn to Note 9 which is :n Page :,1 of the assessrent checklist. And, in particular I would li%e t 7 to discuss the statement in Note 9 that this particular 8I table supplies instrument rack MM-IR-12. 'I Now, as I understand it, the cable that supplies 10 MM-IR-12 may be submerged during an accident; is that i correct? 12 1 A (Witness Woodward) That's correct. I 13 0 However, the note explains that instrument rack I' MM-IR-12 is denoted operability Code C. Now, would you 15 explain what operability code C means? I' A In accordance with the regulations and criteria II set forth in NUREG 0508 and Regulatory Guide 1.99, all the 18,' equipment in seabrook for which qualification is addressed I',j is assigned operability codes. 1 20 j Cperability code C represents equipment which may 21 I see what we call harsh environment of which submergence may be 22 I one subsequent to design basis events. 23 However, it performs no safety function reladhe te mitigating the accident or putting the plant in a safe 25 8 / condition after these events. And, also it has been evaluated sI i 23-i 1-SueW ly to see if any f ailures cf this equipnent due :: the er.ir:r,- d 2 {' ment will effect anything else in the plant, the safety of 3i the plant. t t 4i O Okay. I would like to turn to Reference 12 whi:n ) 5I is the letter frem the Impe11 Corporation to Yankee At:mic, 4 dated February 2nd, 1986. Now, on February 2nd, do I ander-i 7 stand it that at that tire the Impe11 Corporation considered aj that instrument rack MM-In-12 was Class 1E equipment which 1 ,j would have been operability Code A7 l 10 ! (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.) it ' A Yes. As of the date of this letter, the equipnent 12 on, and parts of instrument rack of MM-IR-12, were considered a 3 13 to be essential to the plant at that time. 14 Q And, am I correct that Incell suggested that 15 rack MM-IR-12 should either be relocated above fleod level la I or it should be shown that operability for a moderate energy 17 ! line break is not required? I \\ 14 Is that correct? 19 (The witness is looking at the doeur.ent.) 20, A Yes, as stated on Page 4 of that letter. I 21 Q Now, did New Hampshire Yankee relocate this instrument rack? 22 23 l A (Witness Salvo) During the initial phase of the 24.l EQ program, an assumption was made that -- a conservative m. a =w.,i i., j 25.l assumption was made -- many pieces of equipment were assu.ed i i i l l 4 Jii I i .suew i to have an operability C:de ), which meant that they were k 2j required to perform a safety function. When the specific 3 files were reviewed and we encountered problems that did not t 4 snvelope all accident assumptions, censervative action assu p-i 3 tiens, that we made we went back and did a specific review of 1 6; each piece of equipment's operability requirements. 7; This is what was done for this particular instrume..: gq rack. It was originally assumed an operability Code A as a ,l conservative assumption. And, after problems were encountered jo ' due to submergence, we then performed a specific review for 11 ' that piece of equipment. And, it was determined that no P ece of equipment in thet rack was required to perform any i 12 g 13 safety function during a mild energy break. 14 And, that was performed by United engineers. 15 Q And, was a report and an evaluation prepared for 16 that piace of equipment? 17 A I believe so. O But, you are not sure? It i, 19 ; A Well, United has done a document of review. I 2o haven't seen a report. But, United did perform a review and 11 I have not specifically seen the report. I 22 Q Now, turning back to the Note 9 in the assessment d checklist, Note 9 refers to Reference 16 as an explanation 23 24 for the downgrading of the instrument rack, MM-IR-12, fr:n me. s n., i% 25 ' operability Code A to operability Code C; is that correct? t 1 s 'a 3?? i t 4-suew 1 [, (Mr. Woodward and Mr. salvo are conferring.) 2( A (Witness Woodward) Reference 16 reports that the 3 operability code will be changed in the program from either A 'i 4 7

3 to C.

3 Q And, Reference 16 -- correct ce if I'm wr:ng, but 4' Reference 16 is the only reference in this file to the change c 7y in the operability code for that instrument rack, from A to i 4 l1 C. It's the only explanation that's given of how this ,4l operability code has changed. 10 ( Is that right? r Il i (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.) 12 A Yes, this is the official United engineer's l 13 documentation that notifies po'ople that the change will 14 occur. Ultimately, the equipment list or that harsh.nvir:n-13 cent list we have previously talked about vill show that 16 change. 17 0 okay. I would just like to review this reference 14] with you since it is a kind of unusual looking document. i 19 f The first pave is an engineering change authoriza-20 tions is that right? 6 1 i 21 ' A That's correct. 22'; O Wasically, this lists the equipment, the specifi: i 23 pieces of equipment, for which the company is requesting 24 the authorization to downgrade the safety code? l 3 1 wer a menn sn a 23 J (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.) 0 I e 4 4 BERCERON AFFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT F EXCERPT FROM ENVIR0letENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT (EQR) CONTENTS 1. $5N-886, IACC0F tranSmitt1R$ RQR 3. EQR, Section 2.1 a i i l I I i 1 h k L s ? ). \\ SEASAC0K jfA;lQy En8tneering Cffice October 31. 1935 Pubec SeMee of New Harroteo SBN-586 Ne w MempsNte Yank e e Ohrlden T.F. $7.1.2 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20535 Attention: Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing References (a) Construction Permits CPPR-1J5 and CPPR-136 Docke t Nos. 50-443 and 50-444 (b) PSNN Letter ($8N-349), dated August 12, 1983, "Response to Safety Evaluation Report Outstanding :ssue #6 (SER 3.11, Equipment Qualification 3 ranch)," J. DeVincentis to C. W. Knighton

Subject:

Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment: SER Outstanding Issue #6 Dear Sir As discussed at the June 13, 1985 seating regarding Seabrook's Environmental Qualification Progras, the report entitled, "Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipsent Isportant to Safety" (hereinafter referred to as ICR), was being updated and would be subsitted to the NRC in the late fall. Accordingly, please find enclosed three (3) copies of the revised EQk, which documents our cospliance with 10CTR50.49.

It is also our understanding, from the ab4ve referenced seating, that the NRC site audit would be scheduled approximately six to eight (6-8) weeks after submittal of the EQR. We respectively request that you advise us as soon as possible of your plans for conducting this audit, so that we can begin planning for support of your audit activities.

If you have any questions or require further clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact us.

V y truly yours.

v ns

[ John DeVincentis. Director Engineering and Licencing Esclosure cca Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Service List P O ke 300. Seocaa:n. NH C3874. fe:ech:no (cJ) 474 95.9

V1111aa 5. Jordan. It!

Donald E. Chick k

Diane Curran Town Manager Ha rmon. Weiss & Jordan Town of Exeter 20001 5. Street. N.W.

10 Tront Street suite 630 Exeter. NH 03833 Vashington, D.C.

20009 arentwood Board of Selectmen Robe rt C. Pe rit s RED Dalton Road Of fice of the Executive Legal Director Brentwood, NH 03833 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coesission wa s hing ton, DC 20555 Richard E. Sullivan. Mayor City Hall Robert A. Backus. Esquire Newburyport. KA 01950 116 Lowell Street P.O. Box 316 Calvin A. Canney Manc be ste r. NH 03105 City Manager City Hall Philip Ahrens. Esquire 124 Daniel Street Assistant Attorney Ceneral Portsecuth, NH 03801 Augusta. ME 04333 Dana 81sbee. Esquire Mr. John 3. Tanser Assistant Attorney General Designated Representative of Of fice of the Attorney Cene ral the Town of Hampton 206 State House Annex 5 Morningside Drive Concord NH 03301 Hampton, NH 03842 Anne Ve rse. Chairpe rson Roberta C. Fevear Board of Selectmen Designated Representative of Town Hall the Town of Hampton Talls South Hampton NH 03827 Drinkvater Road Hampton Talls, NW 03844 Patrick J. McKeon Selectmen's office Mrs. Sandra Cavutis 10 Central Road Jesignated Representative of Rye. NH 03870 the Town of Kensington RTD 1 Carole T. Kagan. Esquire East Kingston NH 03827 Atomic Safety and Licensing leard Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission Jo Ann shotwell Esquire Va shi ng ton, DC 20555 As sistant At torney General Environmental Protection Bureau Mr. Anst Machiros Department of the Attorney Gene ral Chat raan of the Board of Selectmen One Ashburton Plare 19th Floor Town of Newbury loston, MA 02108 Newbury MA 01950 Sena tor Cordon J. Huaphrey Town Manager's Office U.S. Senate Town Hall - Triend Street Washington, DC 20510 Amesbury. MA 01913

( ATTNI Toa Surac k)

Senator Cordon J. Huaphrey Diana P. Randall 1 F111sbury Street 70 Collins Street Concord NH 03301 Seabrook, NH 03874 (A!!N: Herb Saynton)

J PUBLIC SERVICE CCNPANY CF NEW HAMPSHIRE e

SEABROOK STATION ENY!RONMENTAL OVALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT !MPORTANT TO SAFETY 4

2.0 CEFIN!?!CN OF ELECTRICAL EOUIPMENT imp 0RTANT 70 SAFETY 2.1 Oriteria for Selection of touloment The Seabrook environmental cualf fication program addresses all electrical equipment important to safety which is 4

located in a potentially harsh environment.

Equipment which would not be exposed to a harsh environment during postulated accident conditions (f.e., mild envirorumnt) is not included.

A mild environment, as deffned in 10 CFR l

50.49(c) is, "...an environment that would at no time be significantly more severe than the envimnment that would occur during normal plant operation, including anticipated operational occurrences."

t I

Seabrook Station defines a harsh envirorment as those areas of the plant whtre norms) or accident environmental I

temperatures exceed 130*F, pressures exceed 1 psig,

~

humidity is 100% and condensing, or the total integrated radiation dose exceeds 1 x 104 reds.

Electrical equipment important to safety dich wre con-sidered for inclusion within the scope of the Seabrook program includes the following:

i A.

Safety-related (Class IE) electrical equipment.

B.

Nonsafety-Related electric equipment whose failure under postulated environmental conditions ceuld I

prevent satisfactory accomp1f shment of safety j

functions, i

C.

Post eccfdent monitoring equipment.

i The systems found to contain electric toutpment in the above categories are 11sted in Table 21.

l 2.2 Identification of Eoutument l

In response to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 caragraph (d), a documented review was performed of all applicable i

design documents to assure that all equipment important to safety (10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(31]

was identified.

The equipent was listed and categorized in accordance with the guidance provided in Appendix E to i

Regulatory Guide 1.89, Rev.1 l

Revisien 2 l

l 10/31/85 1

2-1 i

I i

e 9

BERGERON AFFID 71T ATTACHMENT C 1

l ITT SURPRENANT RG-58 COAXIAL CABLE APPLICATIONS CATECORY OUANTITY LISTING Spare RG-58 Coaxial Cable 21 Sheet i RG-58 cables (now spares) routed at least partially 12 Sheet 2 through a harsh environment with the nuclear island (replaced with RG-59)

RC-58 Cables located in mild environm2nt within 74 Sheets 3 the nuclear island thru 8 RG-58 Cables routed only with other nonsafety-10 Sheet 9 related cables outside the nuclear island RG-58 Cables routed in mild environments within 9

Sheet 10 the nuclear island and routed only with nonsafety-related cables outside the nuclear island Total no. of cables 126 1

Sheet I cf 11 No.

CABLE NO.

ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES

_CATECORY FICURE FI'NCTION CLASSIFICATION Monsafety-related 1.

FM4-JXI/2 CE2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A ET3B Spare Al

• Nonsafety-related 2.

FM7-JII/2 CR2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Spare Al

• Nonsafety-related 3.

FM3-JW5/2 CE2, C54, CBIO, ETI, PB25. PBil, PBl2 Spare A3

• 4.

F%-JW5/2 CB2, CB4, CB10. ETI, PB25. PBil, PB12 Spare A3

• Nonsafety-related 5.

FM6-JX5/2 CE2, CR4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Spare B

• Nonsafety-related b.

F?"4-JK5/2 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4 A, ET3A Spa re B

• Nonsafety-related 7.

FM74;Y4/2 CR2, CB4, CB6 A Spare B

• Nonsafety-related M.

FM4-CY4/2 CE2, CB4, CB6A Spa re B

• Nonsafety-related 9.

FE7-FM6/2 CBl. CB2 Spare B

• Nonsafety-related 10.

Fm-CY6/2 CE2, C1%, C%A Spa re B

• honsafety-related Nonsafety-related 11.

FM4-CY6/2 CE2, CB4, CB6A Spa re B

• Nonsafety-related 12.

FM3-FPl / 2 CB2 Spare B

• 13.

FM7-FPI/2 CB2 Spa re B

• honsafety-related Nonsafety-related 14.

FE7-FM4/2 CBl. CB2 Spa re B

• Nonsafety-related 15.

FM3-CYo/2 CE2, CB5A, CB4, TB Spare C

• 16.

FM7-CYo/2 CB2, CB5A, CB4, TB Spa re C

• Nonsafety-related 17.

F86-GI)

CBl. CB4, TB Spare C

• Nonsafety-related IM.

FM3-CY9/2 CE2, CB5A, C54. TB Spare C

• Nonsafety-related Nonsafety-related 19.

FM6-CY9/2 CB2, CB5A, CB4, TB Spare C

• 20.

FE2-FM4/ 2 CBl. CE2 Spare B

• Nonsafety-related 21.

FE2-FM6/ 2 CBl. CE2 Spare B

• Nonsaf ety -rela ted

• See Note I

Sheet 2 of Il No.

CABLE NO.

ENVIRONMENTAL ZCNES CATEGORY FTCURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.

FM4-Jti CB2, CM, ET2A ET4 A. ET3A, ET3B lia rsh Al R placed by RC-59 Nonsafety-related (Spare) 2.

FM7-JXI CB2, CB4 ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3T.

Ilarsh Al Replaced by KC-$9 b osafety-related (Spare) 3.

FM4-JXI/I CE2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A. ET3A,ET3B Ila rsh Al Replaced by RC-59 Wasafety-related (Sgure) 4.

FM7-JXt/l CB2, C84. ET2A, ET4A, ET3A. ET3B lia rsh Al Repitced by RC-59 Nonsafety-related (Spare) 5.

GU4-Y59/2 PBl2, PBX 3. PBl4, PBl4A PB13 PBl5C. :'BISA Ita rsh A2 Replaced by RC-59 Nonsafety-related

( Spa re)

~

6.

GU4-Y59/4 PB12. PBil, PBl4, PBl4A. PBil, PBl5C, PB15A lia rsh A2 Rep. sed by RC-59 knsafety-related (Spare) 7.

CU4-YS9/3 PBl?. PBil. PB14, PBl4A. PB13. PBl5C, PBl5A ita rsh A2 Replaced by RC-59 hasafety-related (Spare) j M.

GU4-YS9/5 PBl2, PB11 PB14. PBl4A, PRI3, PBISC, PB15A liarsh A2 Replaced by RC-59 knsafety-related (Spare) 9.

FM3-JW5 CB2, CB4, CB10. ET1. PB25. PBil, PB12 Ila rsh A3 Replaced by RC-59 k nsafety-related (Spare) 10.

FM3-JV5/1 CE2, CB4, CB10. ETI, PB25. PBil PBl2 Ita rsh A3 Replaced by RG-59 knsafety-related (Spare)

II.

FMir-JW5/I CB2, CB4, CBlo ETI, PB25, PBil. PBl2 liarsh A3 Replaced by RC-59 knsafety-related (Spare) 12.

FMb-JWS CB2, CB4, CB10. ETI, PS25, PBl1. PRI2 Iturmh A3 Replaced by RG-59 Nonsafety-related (Spare)

---

,7

I

~

Sheet 3 of 11 NO.

CABLE NO.

RhVIRONMENTAL ZT ES CATEGORY QGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.

FM4-JK5 CR2, CB4, ET2A, ET41. ET3A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications l

1 2.

FM6-JX5/1 CB2, Ch4, ST2A, ET41. ET3A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 3.

FM6-JK5 CB2, CB4, ET74, r.T44, "7?A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 4.

FM4-J K5/1 CB2, CR4, ET2A, ET4 A. ST3A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 5.

FEZ-FM4/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 6.

FS2-FN1/3 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Cosputer Consafety-related Applications l

7.

F52-FNS/3 CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nons afe ty-rela ted l

Applications 1

i 8.

F72-FNS/2 CB1, CB4, CBS A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Ncnsafety-related Applications 9.

FM6-GY6/1 CR2, CB4, CB6A Hild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 1

10.

F52-FN1/4 CB1, C64, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related i

-l Applications J

11.

F52-FN5/4 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 12.

FM6-GY6 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related i

Applications 13.

F52-FNI/5 CBl. CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related j

Applications i

1 1

1 i

4

- - - +

e--

w

~m w

m, w

Sheat 4 ef 11 NO.

CABLE NO.

ENVIn0NMENTAL PONES CATECORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 14.

F52-FN5/5 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 15.

FMO-FT5 CB2, CBI Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 16.

FM4-GY6/1 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Noniafety-related App!ications 17.

FMO-FT5/1 CB2, CBI Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafe ty-related Applications 18.

F52-FN1/6 CBl. CS4, Ch2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fety-rela ted Applications 19.

W4 H-W4J CBlF, CBID Mild B

Station Computer Norsa fety-related Applications 20.

F52-FN5/6 CB1, CB4, CH5A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 21.

F52-FN1/7 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 22.

FS2-FN5/7 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 23.

FN4-W411/3 CB2, CBSA, CSIF Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related l

Applications 24.

F81-FN4 CB1, CB4, CB5A, C32 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 25.

FM3-FPI CB2 Mild B

Ctation Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 26.

FN4-W411/2 CB2, CBSA, CBIF Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 27.

FM7-FPI CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications

Sheet 5 cf 11 NO.

CABLE NO.

ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATER,ORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 28.

FM3-FPl/l CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 29.

FM7-FPl/l CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 30.

F90-FN4/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applicctions 31.

F10-FMO CB1, CB4, CB5A, CH2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fe ty-related Applications 32.

F90-FN4/1 CB1, C34, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nor safety-rela ted Applications 33.

FS2-FNS CB1, CB4, CBSA, CH2 Mild B

J'

'on Computer Nonsa fe ty-rela ted lica tions 34.

F72-FNS CB1, CB4, CB5A, CH2 Mild B

Sta.on Computer Nonsa fe ty-related Applications 35.

F52-FN1 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fety-related Applications 36.

F31-FN1 CBI, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 37.

F31-FN5 CB1, CB4, CSS.;, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 38.

FE7-FM6 CBI, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 39.

FM4-GY4 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 40.

FE2-FM6 CBl. CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fe ty-related Applications 41.

FM7-CY4 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications

~

. sn She:t 6 af 11 NO.

CABLE NO.

ENVIPMMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FICIA(E FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 42.

FE7-FM6/1 CBl. CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 43.

FEZ-FM6/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer ~ Nonsafety-related Applications 44.

F61-FN1/1 CBl. CB4, CR5n, C82 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications i

l l

45.

FM7-cY4/1 CB2, CB4, C3oA Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 46.

F61-FN1/3 CB1, CB4, CESA, CR2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 47.

F61-FNI/2 CB1, CB4, C55A, CS2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 48.

F40-FN5/1 CB1, CB4, Ce5A, Cs2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 49.

FN4-W411 CB2, CR5A. CBlF Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 50.

F40-FN5/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 51.

FM4-CY4/1 CB2, C34. CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 52.

FN4-W4H/l CB2, Ch5A, CBIF Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 53.

FMO-FTS/2 CB2, CBI Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 54.

W4tt-W4J/2 CBIF, CBID Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications i/

..... _ - -. _ - -... _ ~.

_~_

=. _

Shent 7 cf 11 NO.

CABLE NO.

ENTERONMENTAl, ZONES CATECORY FIGURE TUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 55.

FMO-FT5/3 CB2, CBI Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 56.

W4ti-W4J/1 CBIF, CBID Mild B

Station Compt *er Nonsafety-related Applicatfor.-

57.

F90-FN4 CBI, CB4 CB. A CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related 3

Applications 58.

W4 tt-W4J /3 CBIF, CBID Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 59.

FID-FM0/1

, CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsaf e ty-rela ted Applications to.

F40-FN5 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fe ty-related Applications 61.

FID-FM0/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nons afe ty-rela t ed Applications 62.

F52-FN1/1 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-rela t ed Applications 63.

FS2-FNS/l CBl. CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 64.

F31-FN!/1 CB1, 034. CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 65.

F61-FN1 CB1, CB4. CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 66.

FM4-GY6 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications l

67.

FID-FM0/3 CBl. CBE, C35 A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 68.

FE7-FM4 CBl CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsa fety-related Applications I

1 i

.I

Shett 8 cf 11 l

NO.

CABLE NO.

EhVIRONMENTel AOhES CATECORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION l

69.

F52-FN1/2 CBl CB4, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-relo*.ed Applications j

70e F52-FN5/2 CBl. te4, 035A, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 71.

FE2-FM4 CB1, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related-Applications 72.

F72-FN5/1 CBI, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 73.

F31-FNI/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B

Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 74.

FE7-FM4/1 CB1, Ch2 Mild h

Station Computer Nonsafety-related

.pp11 cations i

i i

a

]

l I

Shest 9 cf 11 i

i NO.

CABLE NO.

ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATEGORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.

C75-R3J/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-1988 Level Control 2.

C75-R3G WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-198A Level l

Control 3.

G75-R3J WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsa fe ty-related TK-1988 Level Control 4.

G75-R3L/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Concentrate Nonsafety-related Bottoms TK-200 Level Control 5.

G67-ZM3/2 WPB Note 2 D

?rimary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 6.

G67-ZM3/3 WPB Note 2 D Primary be sins Nonsafety-related Tank DeAasifier TK-67 Level Cor. trol 7.

G67-ZM3/4 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 8.

C67-ZM3/5 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 9.

G75-R3G/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-198A Level Control 10.

G75-R3L WPB Note 2 D Whste Concentrate Nonsafety-related Bottoms TK-200 Level Control

She:t 10 cf 1I NO.

CABLE NO.

ENVIRONMENTA1. ZONF.S CATECORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.

FM3-CY9 CB2, CESA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 2.

F M 9/1 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 3.

FM6-GY9/1 CB2, CB5A, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 4.

FM6-GY9 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications l

5.

FM3-GYO CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafe ty-related Applications 6.

FM7-GYO CB2, C5154, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications y

J i

7.

FM3-CYo/l CB2, "*S.h Cin

'fB Note 3 C Station Computer Nons rufe ty-rela ted j

Applications l

8.

FM7-GYO/1 CB2, CB57., CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related l

Applications 4

j 9.

F86-S3W CB1, CB4, TB Note 3 C Cenerator Hydro-Nonsafety-related j

gen Core Cooling i

Monitor i

t 4

i i

}

4

.c Shest 11 ef 11 4

NOTES:

{

1.

Routing of spares thre3gh envitonmental zones is as shown in referenced figure, however, the cable is not connected to any devices as the figure depicts.

)

]

2.

RG-58 cables routed outside nuclear 1siend only with other nonsafety-related cables.

l 3.

RG-58 cables routed in mild environments within the nuclear island and routed only with nonsafety-related j

cables outside the nuclear island.

LEGEND / KEY a

i Category Column i

Spare - Spare RG-58 Cables Harsh - RG-58 Cables (now spares) routed at least partially through a harsh environment within the nuclear

]

(replaced with RC-59)

Mild

- RG-58 Cables lo sted in mild environments within the nuclear island i

}

Functions Column 1

Station Computer - Ali Seabrook Station Plant Computer Applications, i.e., connections between main frame and computer peripheral connections between computer peripherals, etc.

Environmental Zones TB - Turbine Building outside nuclear island WPB - Waste Processing Building outside nuclear island

(..

t 1

BERGERON AFFIDAVIT

,4 1

ATTACHMENT H i

ITT SURPRENANT RG-58 COAXIAL CABLE APPLICATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ZONE ROUTINGS CONTENTS f

Figure Al Figure A2 Figure A3 Figure B Figure C Figure D i

i r

.l l

i l

v' i

4

I

's i

i e

HE S

a

=

8 3

=

W e

m W E Q

J wW

=. w W sa W

Z E amW ZI Z S m%z se m Z

gw h

w g

f/////////-

'/)

• @ m m

W

/

3 1 e

/

Qy @

la. u M gm i

W N

E*$m D

• g

/

/

d agu

=

2=g w

1g *" O -

.b

=

ET3m w m E! e s=

/

mua w

y ZI

/

Z

/

5, E s

/

W m

/

w u

/

~'

t mm

/

CC CJ ww l

/

w

\\

ct) is s ed

/

wZ

/

Z3

/

p g y///////mmm/.

,en a

/

.I m

/

' [U,

/

~m

/

bJ$

l m m /

a

/

w

/

/

/

=

/

D

/

.a aI

/

m

///////b {T a e

/

U ///-

B ;

m.

w-uw

F!GURE R2

~~

Legend PB-12 Pis-11

(

DGSFR PNL-Degasifier Control Panel PRB EL. 25-P8B EL. 25' l

DGSFR TERM B0H-Degasifier Lepel HRRSH HRRSH Termination Box

~

Cable Quantities-4 SPARE DGSFR (4 RCTIUE CRBLES REPLACED IUITH suu,,uuuuuy PNL Q

RS-59) k L

I PB-14R PB-15

(

l PRB EL. 7' s

Q l

PRB EL. 7' HARSH l

HARSH h.wwww S wwwwwwwwww-

.wswwws PB-14

(

PRB EL 7*

(

(

HRRSH I

N l

{"*'""""U DGSFR k

TERM

]

BOX lll i

PB-15R PB-150 il PRR EL. 7' PRB EL. 7' HRRSH HRRSM

l i

ELGl!RE R3 Legend SC-Station Computer Applications Cable Quantities-6 SPRRE (4 RCTIUE CABLES REPLACED LUITH CB-2 RG-59)

CONTROL BLDG EL. 75' MILD SC w

It tb k

C8-4 CONTROL BLDG Q Ei. 50'

(

MILD Q

D's N

--..e _

.____z D'

l Es-in tv mummuu

.mmuumu suumummu

<mi SC l

ET 't PB-25 PB-11 EL. 216 P8-12 TRRYCHR56 PAR EL.25' PR8 EL.25' MILD P88 EL~25' MG. H HARSH 9

EL 30'8" HRRSii a

n

I c

1 l

~

EiguntB.

Leger.d CB-1,CB-2,CS-1D,CB-1F SC-Station Computer Applications j

E8NTROL BLDG Cable Quantities-74 Active,12 Spare l

EL 73*

MILD 1

1 SC SC l

sm

-w s

k k Dm\\ k k v

RR Q(

ET-2R

& Dmmm' &

ELECTRiCHL TUNNEL "R" D

Q EL. D' MILD

{

hmsuwmmmy I

Cs-4,Cs-sR R

CONTROL BLDG D

{

)

EL se' MILD N

Q ET-4R ET-3R R

ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "R" ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "R" d

k FL O' MILD EL. O' MILD SC mmmm mmmmmsmmm, mmt C.-.R s

SC CONTROL BLDG I

EL 21*6" MILD h

.~.

ELGRBLE Legend SC-Station Computer Applications MCB-Main Control Board Een Mon-Ser.erator Hydrogen Core Cooling Monitor g

Cable Quantities-9 Active,5 Spare a

w v

n 08-2 08-1 l"

CONTROL BLDS EDNTBDL BLD6 EL 75' MILD EL. 75' MILD l

l-SC l MCB ll l

4 ll s

1 s

s s

s s

s s

s a

\\

l I

I l"

EEN s

unmu u ms MON s

i s

I s

s i

Numm mmuumm4m.

SC CB-SS CH-4 CONTROL BLDS

,5 CDNTHDL BLD6 l

l Ei, SD* MILD TURBINE BLD6 l

EL.50' MILD 1

p w

v INSillE NUCLERR DUTSIBE NUCLEAR l

ISLEND

{l ISLRND l

4 1

I s

E. E 83 E

w

.s.

=

u.

.M.E i

M w

E2 gu w=S" w*ma s e F..==w.=s== t 1

i=.

=

m-..II.wc.

s u..

e i

me

• E. u * *C C e i SE E s.

w f.i g

• a )4 s.

n un es Eo i

MK W

s

.EE mm 1

s

=

JE ES S

W ZE and M

W W

M

$a a

a

D

.J

.J i

g a

M g

y O

M

$g g

I h<

w w

a w

m hg W

M m

/

g d.

J

==

E s sums. w =

=

r..

mz um m m om s

l E.

W n

C Wh ba y

j NA_,_

a

$m g

L

=

W

,w h M

g

%m m"

Ed E

e y,J Ed A

1 a -

n II ~

M

=

g a

i i

l 4

l l

l l

h

~

f, 4

NL ali! r SN;C CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeffrey P. Trout, one of the attorneys for the Applicants herein, hereby certify that on September 9,,1988, I made service of the within documents by depositing c les U

thereof with Federal Express, prepaid, for delivery to" 6F$1C~ "t where indicated, by depositing in the United States mail, first class postage paid, addressed to) the individuals listed below.

Administrative Judge Sheldon J.

Robert Carrigg, Chairman Wolfe, Esq., Chairman, Atomic Board of Selectmen Safety and Licensing Board Panel Town Office U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Atlantic Avenue Commission North Hampton, NH 03862 East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Administrative Judge Emmeth A.

Diane Curran, Esquire Luebke Andrea C.

Ferster, Esquire 4515 Willard Avenue Harmon & Weiss Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Suite 430 2001 S Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20009 Dr. Jerry Harbour Stephen E. Merrill Atomic Safety and Licensing Attorney Genural Board Panel George Dana Bisbee U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Assistant Attorney General Commission office of the Attorney General East West Toners Building 20 Capitol Street 4350 East West Highway Concord, NH 03301-6397 Bethesda, MD 20814 Adjudicatory File Sherwin E. Turk, Esquire i

f Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of General Counsel Board Panol Docket (2 copies)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission One White Flint North, 15th Fl.

East West Towers Building 11555 Rockville Pike 4350 East West Highway Rockville, MD 20852 Bethesda, MD 20814

• Atomic Safety and Licensing Robert A.

Backus, Esquire Appeal Board Panel Backus, Meyer & Solomon U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory 116 Lowell Street Commission P.O.

Box 516 Washington, DC 20555 Manchester, NH 03105

4 Philip Ahrens, Esquire Mr. J.

P.

Nadeau Assistant Attorney General Selectmen's office Department of the Attorney 10 Central Road General Rye, NH 03870 Augusta, ME 04333 Paul McEachern, Esquire Carol S.

Sneider, Esquire Matthew T.

Brock, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Sheines & McEachern Department of the Attorney General 25'daplewood Avenue One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor P.O.

Box 360 Boston, MA 02108 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Mrs. Sandra Gavutis Mr. Calvin A. Canney Chairman, Board of Selectmen City Manager RFD 1 - Box 1154 City Hall Route 107 126 Daniel Street Kensington, NH 03827 Portsmouth, NH 03801

• Senator Gordon J. Humphrey R.

Scott Hill-Whilton, Esquire U.S.

Senate Lagoulis, Clark, Hill-Whilton &

Washington, DC 20510 McQuire (Attn:

Tom Burack) 79 State Street Newburyport, MA 01950'

• Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Mr. Peter J. Matthews One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Mayor Concord, NH 03301 City Hall (Attn:

Herb Boynton)

Newburyport, MA 01950 Mr. Thomas F.

Powers, III Mr. Will.iam S.

Lord Town Manager Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter Town Mull - Friend Street 10 Front Strcot Anesbury, MA 01913 Exeter, iiH 03833 H. Joseph Flynn, Esquiro Charles P. Graham, Esquiro Office el General Counsol Mut/phy and Graham Federal Emergency Management 33 Lcw Street Agency Newburyport, MA 01950 SOC C Street, S.W.

Washington, DC 20472 Gary W. Holmes, Esquire Richard A. Hampe, Esquire Holmes & Ells Hampe and McNicholas 47 Winnacunnet Road 35 Pleasant Street Hampton, NH 03841 Concord, NH 03301 Y~

e.

i Mr. Richard R.

Donovan Judith H. Mizner, Esquire Federal Emergency Management 79 State Street Agency Second Floor Federal Regional Center Newburyport, MA 01950 130 228th Street, S.W.

Bothell, WA 98021-9796 y'

, *, ~ -

'.j//.:.

~-~

Jeffgey P. Trout

(*= Ordinary U.S. First Class Mail.)

i 3-

-