ML20153F053
| ML20153F053 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1986 |
| From: | Keast D CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO., HMM ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-#186-167 OL, NUDOCS 8602250288 | |
| Download: ML20153F053 (70) | |
Text
I t
(y} "
(
RELATED CORRESPONDENCQ l February 21, 1986 l ~
USNRC j
i
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g gg g 7 l .
t
-~ FFICE Gr yy .a,_ ,
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OCME! i fi< v r;f.
i In the Matter of )
l ')
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY )
l and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN ) Docket No. 50-400 OL MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY )
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power )
Plant) _ )
A
- ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY OF DAVID N. KEAST ON EDDLEMAN 57-C-3 (NIGHT-TIME NOTIFICATION) i I
l h
96022502ee e60PP1 k PDR ADOCK . t)$000400 )
<- h l
I i ,
h O
r a .
Q.1 Please state your name.
A.1 David N. Kaast.
Q.2 By whom are you employed, and what is your position?
Q.2 I an a Vice President and Senior Project Manager of HMM Associates, Inc. of Concord, Massachusetts, where I spe-cialize in public warning system studies. RMM has been re-tained by Carolina Power & Light Company to analyse the Harris siren system in response to Eddleman Contention 57-C-3.
Q.3 Have you testified previously in this proceeding about Eddleman 57-C-3?
A.3 Yes. My direct testimony was filed on October 18, 1985, as a part of Applicants' " Testimony of David N. Keast, Alvin H. Joyner and Dennis S. Mileti on Eddleman 57-C-3 (Night-Time Notification)" (cited herein as "Keast et al."),
which is in the record following Tr. 9375. I was cross-examined during the hearing sessions of November 4 and 5, 1985. I have also prepared " Affidavit of David N. Keast Cor-recting Oral Testimony on Eddleman Contention 57-C-3," which was filed with " Applicants' Supplemental Proposed Transcript Corrections," dated January 2, 1986.
Information on my professional qualifications and experi-ence is already in the record at pages 2 and 3 of, and Attach-ment 1 to, Keast et al.
Q.4 What is the purpose of this additional testimony?
A.4 My additional testimony responds to the Atomic Safety i and Licensing Board's Memorandum and Order (Limited Reopening
- L.
i .
3 of the Record on Eddleman Contention 57-C-3), dated January 16, 1986. In particular, I will provide comment, as the Board in-
) vited, on some of the Board's tentative views of the evidence, and I will provide the information specifically requested in Items 1, 3 and 4 (pages 8-10) of the Board's Memorandum and l Order.
Q.5 Before we address those subjects, do you have any_
changes or corrections to provide on the evidence presented at the previous hearing sessions?
A.5 Yes. Applicants' Exhibit 46, which was filed on October 18, 1985 along with Applicants' testimony, is a map of the Harris EPZ showing siren locations, night-time siren cover-age contours, and house locations. It was prepared by EMM As-
! sociates to represent the maps I used in performing the calcu-lations described in my previous testimony. I.actually used a set of maps, which are mounted together on a wall in my firm's offices, four times the size of Applicants' Exhibit 4d. While Exhibit 46, which is not a photocopy of the larger map set, was especially prepared to communicate for the record the in-formation I employed in my analysis, I did not use the exhibit, but rather used the larger maps.
When I compared the Board's house count for the first five 1
miles of the EPZ (January 16, 1986 Memorandum and Order, p. 8),
. derived from Applicants' Exhibit 46, with my own count'from the larger maps, the difference appeared to be large and caused me ;
to compare the two maps. The Board noted, at p. 6 of its 1
. , - ,- - - n--, ,~e, --
ep- -- e
o .
1 Memorandum and Order, that Applicants' Exhibit 46 is marginally legible. This problem, plus some errors made in plotting house locations on the smaller map, resulted in the difference in house counts. As I explain later in my testimony, this dif-ference does not affect the tentative conclusions reached by the Board. Nevertheless, in the interest of accuracy, we have prepared a revised Exhibit 46, Applicants' Exhibit __, which accompanies this testimony. The only changes are to the house location identifiers and the size of the siren designations.
To repeat, this map revision does not affect any of my previous testimony.
Q.6 Mr. Keast, in its Memorandum and Order of January 16, 1986, the Board expressed concern about reliance upon the Lukas study (Applicants' Exhibit 48) because the sounds included there do not have frequency spectra resembling those of the Federal Signal Model 1000 Thunderbolt siren. Do you agree with this concern?
A.6 I understand the Board's desire to assess divergent parts of the testimony. However, differences in frequency spectra between the sounds used in the Lukas study and the Harris sirens provide no technically justifiable basis for dis-counting the Lukas study. Lukas used the EPNdB rating scale in reporting his results. The principal purpose of the EPNdB rat-ing scale is to provide a common means for estimating human re-action to all types of sounds after applying defined adjust- i ments for the spectral and temporal properties of the sounds
o . .
(Keast et al. at 19, A.20). Years of research have gone'into the development of the EPNdB rating scale. To the extent that that research has been successful, it is not pertinent whether or not the actual spectra of sounds used for the Lukas study resemble those of sirens because the EPNdB scale provides ad-justments for spectral differences. ,
< In addition, a major property of siren sounds is that they ,
are tonal in nature (i.e., their spectra contain one or more pure-tone components). The 22 studies used by Lukas to develop I
his Figure 2, upon which I relied, include two studies of DC-8 1anding noise. This is a tonal sound which is'very much like that of a siren. One other study used is of " jet aircraft noise" and two are of " jet flyover noise." These may have in-cluded the siren-like sounds of landing jet aircraft. Of course, Lukas also includes a study using an 800 Hz tone (Tr.
9513-14). Thus, there are at least three, and possibly as.many as six, studies included in Lukas that were based upon sleep awakening by tonal sounds.
Q.7 Mr. Keast, the Board has asked that Applicants esti-mate siren arousal frequencies for the 5 to 10 mile area of the EPZ, using both the Horonjeff, et al., data and the Krallmann data. Have you performed such an analysis?
l A.7 Yes.
Q.8 What are the results? i A.8 I estimate that, using the Horonjeff data as in Fig- -
-f j ure 1 of the Board's order, 75% of the households between five ..
Y
-s- 1 l
- _0 __ _ _ - , . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . _ . . . . _ . . , . . . - , _ - . . . .
i l
miles from the plant and the boundary of the EPZ would be awak-ened directly by the sirens. Based upon information noted in my prior direct testimony en people already awake at night (Keast et al. at 9), I have added 3% to this estimate and con-clude that about 78% of the households would be directly alerted. Using Dr. Mileti's calculation method for facilitated informal alerting (Keast et al. at 39), I conclude that almost 92% of all households would be alerted by direct and informal means within 15 minutes after the sirens started sounding.
Using the Krallmann data from Figure 1 of the Board's order, I estimate that 88% of the households would be awakened.
Adding 1% for those already awake, I conclude that about 89% of the households would be directly alerted by sirens. Again using Dr. Mileti's calculation method, I conclude that about 97% of all households would be alerted by direct and informal means within 15 minutes. The detailed results of my calcula-tions of direct alerting are shown on Attachments A and B.
Q.9 What assumptions have you made to reach these esti-mates? .
A.9 As directed by the Board, I have used the following assumptions in the Board's order of January 16, 1986:
- 1. Outdoor sound levels are those shown on Exhibit 46, although our work was actually done on the large maps that have been described, rather than with Exhibit 46.
- 2. The pertinent Horonjeff & Krallmann relationships be-tween Single Event Level (SEL) and % arousal are -
those shown on the Board's Figure 1, including the 7 nonlinearity of the vertical scale. j i
~
,G - -
I did not use any of the ott.er assumptions or approximations on page 7 of the Board's order. Instead, all of my other assump-tions are the same as those made for my original direct testi-mony.
Q.10 Did you use the EPNdB scale in calculating the re-sults you just gave me?
A.10 No, I did not. The Horonjeff and Krallmann awak-ening relationships on Figure 1 of the Board's order are in terms of SEL, and I used that scale. '
Q.ll Would you describe how you calculated your results?
A.ll Yes. Working from our large maps, we counted the houses with various siren sound exposures within five miles of the plant. By subtraction from our original calculation (Attachment 5 of Keast et al.), this gave us the numbers of houses with various exposures between five miles and the bound-ary of the EPZ. The specific house counts are shown on Attach-ment C. I then computed the awakening probabilities (fractions awakened) shown on Attachments A and B for each of the 19 siren sound exposures. These probabilities were computed separately 1
for the Horonjeff and the Krallmann sleep-awakening curves, as provided by the-Board. The sum of the products of the number of houses with each sound exposure times the fraction awakened for that exposure is then the total number of households awak-ened.
The computations of the fractions awakened are included as- ,
2 Attachment D. This consists of a set of 19 tables using
t Horonjeff, and another set of 19 using Krallmann. Each table is for a different outdoor sound level.
On each table, the types of house classifications are ,
identified as, tan = windows open with window fan noise; WAs =
Window A/C unit in same room; WAo = Window A/C unit in adjacent room and bedroom door open; CAn = Central A/C in its on cycle; CAf = central A/C in its off cycle; all in accordance with Attachment 6 of my original testimony. The sound attenuation values to indoors for each class are subtracted to determine the indoor sound levels. These are then compared to the appro-priate indoor background noise levels. In some cases at the lower siren sound levels, a signal-to-noise (S/N) difference of 10dB or less occurs. This affe_ts the value for the integra-tion over the peak of the siren sound. I will describe this process when we discuss Item 3 of the Board's order.
Adjustments for A-weighting and time duration (based upon
! 10 minutes of siren operation) are then added to obtain the SEL value. For each SEL value, the fractions awakened for one per-son are then read from the appropriate curve on Figure 1 of the Board's order. Next the fractions for awakening one of 2 people, one of 3 people, and one of 4 people are computed.
These are then weighted by the U.S. Census data on family sizes for the EPZ (Keast et al. at 23; Nehnevajsa at 25) to determine awakening probabilities for the census family size mix. When
~
j multiplied by the corresponding fractions of homes in each of ,
-4 i
the eight classes, the result is-the fraction of' houses i
]
awakened in each class. assuming the census family-size distri-bution. The sum of these eight fractions is the total fraction awakened: the effective awakening probability for the given outdoor siren sound level.
Q.12 The Board counted 363 houses within five miles of the plant, and according to your Attachment C you counted 589.
How do you explain the difference?
A.12 As I discussed earlier, our work was done with higher legibility maps, four times the area of Exhibit 46, and thus is presumably a more precise count.
Q.13 Could the Board have been misled in its conclusions because it only had Exhibit 46 to count from, and because the Board located so many fewer houses than you did?
A.13 The answer is no. I was concerned about this and did a number of studies to assure myself that the difference in house counts has not significantly affected the Board's compu-tations. The results of my studies are listed on Attachment E.
The first row of Attachment E shows the figures in the Board's Order of January 16, 1986. For the second row, I used all of the Board's assumptions and methods, including the 1 Board's house counts, and repeated the Board's arithmetic. I got the same answers as the Board did using the Board's Krallmann sleep-awakening relationship; but a slightly higher answer using the Board's Horonjeff sleep-awakening relation-ship. The small difference is not particularly significant, ,
but this calculation serves as a basis for comparison with the .
subsequent rows in the table.
~
n
For my second study, we ourselves counted the houses on l the small map (Exhibit 46) and then applied all of the Board's methods and at: amptions. Although we found about 17% more houses than the Board did, I still arrived at essentially the same awakening percentages. This suggests that the precision of house counts is not critical to the results being sought.
For my third study, I used our same house counts from the small map (Exhibit 46), but calculated according to methods and assumptions described in my original testimony. My methods and assumptions include : more detailed breakdown of housing types and background noise levels than the Board assumed (see Attach-ment D), as well as a different distribution of alertable per-sons within households. My calculation methods and assumptions lead to awakening percentages that are 8 to 10% higher than the Board's, even when the Board's sleep-awakening relationships are applied.
Finally, we counted houses within five miles of the plant on the large maps with wb?ch we normally work. We found many more hous'es, but the awakening percentages computed using my methods and assumptions are not significantly different than those I determined from the small map.
My conclusions from the results tabulated on Attachment E are as follows:
.. Although many more houses are identifiable on the large maps, which we normally work with, essentially ,
the same awakening percentages are obtained from e
~
counts on either the large maps or Exhibit 46, when ,
the same computational methods and assumptions are -
applied. J O
- 2. Awakening percentages inside of 5 miles (Attachments E, F, and G), outside of 5 miles (Attachments A and B), and for the entire EPZ (Keast et al. at 9), are all within about 1% of each other when the same com-putational methods and assumptions are applied.
Attachments F and G contain the details of my results in the last row of Attachments E, and are directly comparable to Attachments A and B.
- 3. My computational methods and assumptions lead to awakening percentages 8% to 10% higher than the Board's, even though the Horonjeff or Krallmann sleep-awakening relationships are applied the same way in both cases.
Q.14 Why are the awakening percentages determined by your method 8% to 10% higher than those determined using the assump-tions in the Board's order of January 16, 1986?
A.14 The largest single facter, accounting for 6% to 7%
of the difference, is the difference in assumptions about the number of alertable persons in a household. The Board (p. 7 of the Order of January 16, 1986) developed a distribution from Table 5 of Nehnevajsa (Nehnevajsa at 31), which in turn is based upon national data for 1978; and which eliminates all persons under the age of 18 as potentially alertable. I used data on family size which were derived from the 1980 census for 1
the EPZ (Keast et al. at 23). I According to Nehnevajsa, the census data from which I se-lected my household size distribution "are by far the best es-timates possible" on the socio-demographic statistics for the EPZ (Nehnevajsa at 4, 5). I agree, and consider these data more representative than national data for the development of a y distribution of alertable persons in households for the Shearon Harris EPZ.
l e ,
- ~. . . - .
l More importantly, however, I also agree with Dr. l Nehnevajsa that eliminating those household members under the age of 18 from the alertable population is a "very conservative
, assumption" (Nehnevajsa at 10), indeed, that it is "one of the key conservative limitations" of his results (Nehnevajsa at 23), and that it "is not merely conservative, but somewhat l unreasonable" (Nehnevajsa at 24) to limit the analysis to per-sons 18 years of age or older. .
Dr. Nehnevajsa concludes that all persons over the age of 13 would be able to interpret an alerting message if aroused l
(Nehnevajsa at 24). I would go further and say that even
, younger children, if aroused, would awaken their parents (or by their activity would lead to the awakening of their parents),
and then their parents would hear and interpret the meaning of the sirens. Hence I believe that my distribution of arousable persons per household is much more realistic than that in Table 5 of Nehnevajsa.
The remaining difference between the arousal percentages
. . estimated using the Board's method and those estimated using my method is probably attributable to the greater detail I use in the breakdown of house conditions, as in my Attachment D.
Q.15 Under item 3 of the Roard's order, the question is raised as to whether the approximation used by Kryter to deter-mine SEL values from siren peak dBA levels ~1eads to a signifi-cant underestimation. The Board illustrates this question with h k
Figure 2 of its order. Do you believe the Kryter approximatio;. ]
leads to underestimating the siren stimulus?
I 1
l-
]
l l
1 l
A.15. No. The error resulting from the Kryter approxima- ,
1 tion in this case is about 0.8dB, and hence negligible. This l approximation is generally accepted practice in our field.
,' (See Lee at 28.)
Q.16 How did you come to the conclusion that the error is only 0.8dB7 A.16 I compared the result using Kryter's approximation to the result using my method. My method is close to a true integration of the curve. I will explain this comparison-in i
some detail because it helps illustrate the nature of decibel addition. It may also help resolve questions the Board has about my affidavit of January 2, 1986.
4 As a siren rotates, the sound level at a location on the ground varies with time. The problem is to determine in deci-bels the area under the curve of sound pressure vs. time.
(Note that I have said sound pressure, not sound pressure level. In acoustics, the word " level" always designates a quantity in decibels.) Mathematicians call this process of de-termining the area under a' curve " integration." To describe I the process, let me give a simplified illustration.
Suppose, instead of rotating, the siren is always pointed at us, and can produce 100dBA. If it is on for one minute, then what is the Single Event Level (SEL) of the sound?
1 1 ,
Step-1: Convert the level in dB to sound pressure:
J SP = 10 exp (dBA/10)
= 10 exp (100/10) 10
= 10 Step 2: Multiply by the time duration in seconds. (The curve is now simply a rectangle with its height equal to sound pressure and its base equal to time).
Single-Event Sound Energy (SE) = 10 10 x 60 11
= 6 x 10 Step 3: Convert back to decibels.
SEL =
10 log 10 (SE)
- =
10 log 10 (6 x 1011) i = ll7.8dB The process of converting Perceived Noise Level (PNL) to Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNdB) is analogous for this rectangular example. If the 100dB in our illustration-is a Perceived Noise Level, then:
Step 1: Perceived Noise (PN) = 10 10 1 1 Step 2: Multiply by time in half seconds. j 10 12 i 10 x 120 = 1.2 x 10 Step 3: EPNdB =
10 log 10 (1. x 1012)
= 120.8dB 9
It is common practice (as in Lukas) to use 1/2 sec. as the i
]
1 i
l
time unit for EPNdB, and 1 sec. for SEL. Hence, for the.same starting numbers, the EPNdB value will always be 10 log 10 (2) = 3dB greater than the SEL.
A short-cut approach is often used to simplify the above calculations. For our rectangular example we can say:
- EPNdB =
PNdb + 10 log 10 (T/.5), and SEL =
A-weighted level + 10 log 10 (T/1),
where T is time in seconds. This short-cut approach works be-cause the addition of logarithms is equivalent to multiplica-tion.
For most sounds, the Perceived Noise Level is a complicat-ed function of the sound spectrum. In this particular case
) where we are working just with a 500 Hz tone, the Perceived l Noise Level is equal to the C-weighted sound level plus a 10 dB I
tone correction.
The actual temporal siren sound pattern at any location varies in accordance with the siren directivity pattern
{
(Attachment H), the speed of siren rotation, and the duration of siren operation.
Attachment I is the worksheet I used to determine the com-bined effect of these parameters for my original testimony. It is similar to Figure 2 of the Board's Memorandum and Order of January 16, 1986. It shows the sound level from the siren as a function of azimuth over 1/2 of a rotation of the siren. (The ,
other half would be symmetrical.) I divided the peak of the -
4
+
l l
t
sound pattern into seven rectangular segments and worked en-tirely with these. The balance of the pattern makes a negligi-ble contribution to the EPNdB because the levels are so low.
Each rectangular segment is 10' wide, and hence accounts for 10/180 (or 20/360) of the exposure for someone on the ground.
Thus, a ten-minute siren operation produces a total exposure i
from each segment of 33.3 sec. (66.6 half seconds).
The speed of siren rotation is unimportant in this case because the sirens operate long enough that all directions re-ceive essentially the same sound exposure duration. (For in-stance, if the sirens were to rotate twice as fast there would be twice as many sound peaks at any point on the ground, but
! each would only last half as long. The total duration would be the same.)
The general approach I used to compute the area in deci-bels (i.e., to integrate) under the sound exposure pattern
, which consists of many repetitions of Attachment I is as fol-lows:
4 Step 1) Compute the summed level of the amplitudes of the seven 10* rectangular segments illustrated on Attachment I:
dB 10 exp (dB/10) 0 1
-0.75 0.841
-2.5 0.562
-4.5 0.355
-8 0.158 L
-11,.5 0.071 'h
-14.5 0.035 9 o!
TOTAL 2.987 l
l I
o .
10 log 10 (2.987) = 4.8dB This is the 5dB factor referred to in my oral testimony (Tr. 9564)-and the integration term referred to in my affidavit 1
1 of January 2, 1986.
Step 2) Add the time duration in decibels of a 10*
segment, for 10 min. of siren operation:
10 log 10 (66.6 half seconds) = 18.2 dB.
r This is the time duration term referred to in my testimeny (Tr. 9563) and in my affidavit.
My method is a simple extension of the rectangular example I described above, plus the use of'the normal method for adding
, quantities in decibels. The result is that:
) EPNdB = max. PNdB + 23dB
-l l
when the indoor siren sound level is well above the background 2 noise level in a bedroom.
The reason I used this approach is that it allowed me to simply drop 10' segments from the calculation as the siren sound level approached the background noise level. For exam-l ple, if the siren sound level were only 3dB above the back-ground noise, then:
'I I
s 4
dB 10 exp (dB/10) 0 1
-0.75 0.841
-2.5 0.562
-4.5 x
-8 x
-11.5 x
-14.5 x TOTAL 2.403
, 10 log 10 (2.4) = 3.8dB This is because the number of 10* segments of sound expo-sure above the background noise is reduced. The 18dB time duration factor remains unchanged.
Dr. Kryter, in his testimony used the generally-accepted approximation:
SEL = max. dBA + 10 log 10 (T/2) where T is the total time of siren operation in seconds between the 10dB down points. From Attachment I, the 10dB down points l are at +50*. Hence, for 10 minutes of siren operation, the duration is:
50/180 x 600 = 166.7 sec.
and SEL =
max. dBA + 10 log 10 (166.7/2)
= max. dBA + 19.2dB Recalling that SEL is based upon a 1 second time Unit and EPNdB is based on a 1/2 second time unit, the diffecence between my h approach and that in Dr. Kryter's testimony is only 0.8dB l
(23-3-19.2). This difference is quite small. It indicates l 1
that the difference noted in Item 3 of the Board's Order, and illustrated in Figure 2 attached to the Order, does not signif-icantly alter the calculated acoustic stimulus produced by the
,3 siren's functioning.
, Q.17 With respect to Item 4 of the Board's order, can you i offer any clarification of your January 2, 1986 affidavit?
A.17 Yes. First of all, my error at Tr. 9650 was that I omitted the 18dB time duration term just described.
Secondly, the Board is correct in its conclusion that my l reference to Kryter is to his book, The Effects of Noise on Man, identified on p. 20 of my direct testimony. The pertinent portion of this book (pp. 471-483) was sent to Mr. Eddleman on October 22, 1985, was the subject of cross-examination at'Tr.
A j 9499-9502, and is in evidence as Eddleman Exhibit 70.
Thirdly, the term " integration" in my Affidavit refers to
- the term " integrating" on line 9 of Tr. 9564. I hope my use of l
i this term is clarified by my answer to your previous question.
Finally, I would be happy to answer any other questions the Board has about my Affidavit at this time.
i I
5 s
a t
i I
l
{
ATTACHMENT A ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLOS AWAKEE0 BY SIRENS BETWEEN 5 MILES OF THE SEARON HARRIS PLANT AND THE BOUNOARY OF THE EPZ (using Horonjeff curve from Board Figure 1)
Total # Horonjeff Nominal of Houses (Board Figure 1)
Siren Sound Exposed No. of Level (5 mi. to Fraction Houses Sound Level Zones ,
Outdoors Boundary) Awakened Awakened
>105 dB 112 dB 183 .928 170 100-105 102 154 .886 136 95-100 97 310 .858 266 90-95 92 742 .822 610 2 x 85-90 90 8 .808 6 80-85 + 85-90; 2 x 75-80 + 85-90 88 197 .791 156 85-90 87 1,177 .783 922
) 2 x 80-85 85 117 .766 90 2 x 75-80 + 80-85 84 10 .755 8 75-80 + 80-85; 3 x 70-75 + 80-85 83 181 .747 135 80-85; 3 x 75-80 82 1,672 .737 1,232 2 x 70-75 + 2 x 75-80 81 5 .728 4 -
2 x 75-80; 3 x 70-75 + 75-80 80 355 .718 255 2 x 70-75 + 75-80 79 55 .707 39 1
70-75 + 75-80 78 361 .697 252 75-80; 3 x 70-75 77 379 .684 259 2 x 70-75 75 138 .565 78 70-75 72 232 .532 123 570 67 62 .434 27 TOTALS: 6,338 4,768 -j 4
~
Percentage 75.2%
l 1162/0644c l l
l
ATTACl+ENT B ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLDS AWFKENED BY SIRENS BETWEEN 5 MILES FROM TIE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT AND THE BOUNDARY OF TIE EPZ (using Krallmann Curve from Board Figure 1)
Total # Krallmann Nominal of Houses (Board Figure 1)
Siren Sound Exposed No. of Level (5 mi. to Fraction Houses Sound Level Zones Outdoors Boundary) Awakened Awakened 4 >105 dB 112 dB 183 .984 180 100-105 102 154 .966 149 95-100 97 310 .951 295 90-95 92 742 .934 693 2 x 85-90 90 8 .927 7 80-85 + 85-90; 2 x 75-80 + 85-90 88 197 .915 180 85-90 87 1,177 .911 1,072 2 x 80-85 85 117 .900 105 2 x 75-80 + 80-85 84 10 .893 9 75-80 + 80-85; 3 x 70-75 + 80-85 83 181 .890 161 i 80-85; 3 x 75-80 82 1,672 .883 1,476 2 x 70-75 + 2 x 75-80 81 5 .878 4 2 x 75-80; 3 x 70-75 + 75-80 80 355 .869 308 2 x 70-75 + 75-80 79 55 .863 47 70-75 + 75-80 78 361 .857 309 75-80; 3 x 70-75 77 379 .848 321 2 x 70-75 75 138 .704 97 70-75 '
72 232 .683 158
<70 67 62 .571 35' TOTALS: 6,338 5,606 l
Percentage 88.5%
ll62/0644c i
ATTAC+ENT C COUNTS OF HOUSES WITHIN THE SEARON HARRIS EPZ (from large maps)
Nominal Siren Sound Houses Houses Houses Level in Within Outside Sound Level Zones Outdoors EPZ 5 mi. 5 mi.
> 105 dB 112 ce 206 23 183 100-105 102 178 24 154 95-100 97 337 27 310 90-95 92 800 58 742 2x8%% % 8 0 8 80-85 + 85-90; 2 x 75-80 + 85-90 88 199 2 197 85-90 87 1,256 79 1,177 2 x 80-85 85 120 3 117 2 x 75-80 + 80-85 84 10 0 10 75-80 + 80-85; 3 x 70-75 + 80-85 83 221 40 181 80-85; 3 x 75-80 82 1,826 154 1,672 2 x 70-75 + 2 x 75-80 81 5 0 5 2 x 75-80; 3 x 70-75 + 75-80 80 376 21 355 2 x 70-75 + 75-80 79 79 24 55 1
70-75 + 75-80 78 454 93 361 75-80; 3 x 70-75 77 411 32 379 2 x 70-75 75 146 8 138 70-75 72 233 1 232
< 70 67 62 0 62 TOTALS: 6,927 589 6,338 l
)
b a
1162/0644c 1
i
i n e ATTAONENT D TABLES SHOWING CALCULATIONS OF AWAKENING FRACTIONS USING HORONJEFF, APO USING KRALLMAlm, FOR EACH OF TE 19 Diret.NENT MAXIRM OUTDOOR SIREN SOLND EXPOSURES L
1162/0644c
CALCULATIONS O F- SEL AND FrR A C T I O N S AWAKENED (BASED UPGN BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJIFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 112 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 100.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 36.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 Background lleise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/W Difference >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 104.8 90.8 90.8 90.8 90.8 86.8 86.8 86.8 A-Weighted (-3) 101.8 87.8 87.8 87.8 87.8 83.8 83.8 83.8 Duration (+15.2) 117.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 SEL,d8 117.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 Fractions Asakened 9r ene .820 .733 .730 .730 .730 .690 .690 .690
.968 .927 .927 .927 .927 .904 .904 .904 For 3 .994 .900 .?80 .900 .900 .970 .970 .970 For 4 .999 .995 .995 .995 .995 .991 .991 .991 For Census Fasily .956 .923 .923 .923 .923 .905 .905 .905
.. D 8 FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fastly) .340 .148 .033 .024 .054 .096 .072 .160 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .928 }
D-1 .
n
CALCULATIONS OF S EEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 102 DB Condition fan Ms W4o CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 90.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 '- 72.0 72.0 72.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference )to )to >10 )l0 >10 >10 >10 110 Integration 94.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 76.8 76.8 76.8 A-Weighted (-3) 91.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 73.8 73.8 73.8 Duration (+15.2) 107.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 SEL,dB 107.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 Fractions Aeakened For one .760 .630 .630 .630 .630 .580 .500 .500 For 2 .942 .863 .863 .863 .863 .824 .824 .824 For 3 .986 .949 .949 .949 .949 .926 .926 .926 For 4 .997 .981 .981 .961 .981 .969 .969 .969 For Census Fasily .935 .875 .875 .875 .875 .846 .846 .846 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .0I6 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Hou;es Awakened (Census Fasity) .333 .140 .032 .023 .052 .090 .068 .150 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .886 s i
D-2 l
l l
l
i CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FO R A C T* I O N S A bJ A K E N E D (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 97 DB Condition fan WAs uAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 85.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N DiHerence >10 )l0 >10 )l0 >10 )l0 >10 >10 Integration 89.8 U.8 75.8 75.8 75.8 71.8 71.8 71.8 A-Neighted (-3) 86.8 12.6 72.8 72.8 72.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 Duration (+15.21 102.0 38.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 ,
SEL,dB 102.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 Fractions Aeakened For one .720 .570 .570 .570 .570 .530 .530 .530 For 2 .922 .815 815 .815 .815 .779 .779 .779 For 3 .978 .920 .920 .920 .920 .896 .896 .896 For 4 .994 .966 .964 .966 .966 .951 .951 .951 For Census Fasily .919 .839 .839 .839 .839 .812 .812 .812 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (census Family) .327 .134 .030 .022 .050 .086 .065 .144 i
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .858 D-3 b
I I
i CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJFFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 92 DB Condition fan WAs W4o CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -10 -30 IndoorLevel 80.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 a6.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Oifference )t0 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 )to Integration 84.8 70.8 70.8 70.8 70.8 66.8 66.8 66.8 A-Weighted (-3) 81.8 67.8 67.8 67.8 67.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 Duration (+15.21 97.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 ,
SEL,d8 97.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 Fractions Awakened For one .670 .520 .520 .520 .520 .470 .470 .470 For 2 .991 .770 .770 .770 .770 .719 .719 .719 For 3 .964 .889 .889 .889 .889 .851 .851 .851 For 4 .988 .947 .947 .947 .947 .921 .921 .921 For Census Festly .996 .804 .804 .804 .804 .764 .764 .764 HOUSIN8 FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .104 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fasity) .319 .129 .029 .021 .047 .081 .061 .135 i
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .822 l
D-4
CALCULATIONS O FT SEL_
AND FO R A CT I O N S AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 90 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAa CM Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 78.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 >10 )to 110 >10 )t0 )to >10 Integration 82.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 64.8 64.8 64.8 A C ighted (-3) 79.3 65.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 61.8 61.8 61.8 Duration (+15.2) 95.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 SEL,dB 95.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 Fractions Asakened For one .650 .500 .500 .500 .500 .450 .450 450 For 2 .878 .750 .750 .750 .750 .698 .698 .698 For 3 .957 .875 .875 .875 .875 .834 .834 .834 For 4 .965 .938 .938 .938 .938 .908 .908 .908 ForCensusFasily .886 .789 .789 .789 .789 .747 .747 .747 HOUSIN8 FRACTION .354 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of l
Houses Awakened (Census Fasily) .315 .126 .028 .021 .047 .079 .060 .132 k-9 h
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .808 j D-5 1
i i
n 4j
e w
.l E
CALCULATIQNS O I= SEL -
AND FT R A C T I O NS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 88 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CE' CAf
! Loss to indcors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 76.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 !8.0 58.0 50.0 8ackground Noise 40 49 3? 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 )l0 liJ >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 80.8 M.8 46.8 66.8 66.8 62.8 62.8 62.8
. A-Weighted (-3) 77.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 Duration (+15.21 93.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 i'. . d B 93.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 n tions Asakened For one .630 .470 .470 .470 .470 .430 .430 430 For 2 .863 .719 .719 .719 .719 .675 .675 .675 For 3 .949 .851 .851 .851 .851 .815 .815 .815 kr 4 .981 .921 .921 .921 .921 .894 .894 .894 For Census Facity .875 .764 .764 .764 .764 .728 .728 .728 HOUSINGFRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .104 .08 .177 Fraction of Housas Asakened
- (Census Fasity) .312 .122 .028 .020 .045 .077 .058 .129 , h TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .791
)
i D-6 l
1______
CALCULATIONS QF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 87 DB . .~
r Condition fan W45 WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Losstoindoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 75.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 SIN Difference >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 )t0 >10 >10 Integration 79.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 61.8 61.8 61.8 A-Weighted (-3) 76.8 62.8 62.8 62.8 62.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 Duration (+15.2) 92.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.0 74.0 74.0
- SEL,dB 92.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 l Fractions Aeakened For one .620 460 460 .A60
.460 .420 .420 .420 For 2 .856 .708 .708 .708 .708 .644 .664 .664 For 3 .945 .843 .843 .843 .843 .805 .805 .805 For 4 .979 .915 .915 .915 .915 .887 .887 .887 1
For Census Faeily .870 .756 .756 .754 .756 .719 .719 .719 HOUSING FRACTION .354 .16 .034 .026 .059 .104 .08 .177 Fraction of h Houses Amakened -
(Census Fasity) .310 .121 .027 .020 .045 .076 .057 .127 i
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .783 l
D-7 l 1
O e
C AL.CUL AT I ONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR-SOUND LEVEL: 85 DB Condition fan WAs IMc CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Less to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 73.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Bactgroundlloise 40 49 39 28 13 - 39 28 13
$/N Difference )l0 10.0 )10 110 >10 )l0 )to >10 Integration 77.8 63.6 63.8 63.8 63.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 A-C ighted (-3) 74.8 60.6 60.8 60.8 60.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 Duration (+15.2) 90.0 75.8 76.0 76.0 76.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 SCL,dB 90.0 75.8 76.0 76.0 76.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 Fractions Awakened For one .600 .440 .440 .440 .440 .400 .400 .400 For 2 .840 .686 .686 .686 .686 < 660 .640 .640 For 3 .936 .824 .824 .824 .824 .784 .784 .784 For 4 .974 .902 .902 .902 .902 .870 .870 .870 For Census Fasily .858 .738 .738 .738 .738 .698 .698 .698 HOUS!Ill FRAC 710N .356 .!e .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 u
Fraction of "j Houses Awakened j (Census Family) .305 .118 .027 .019 .044 .074 .056 .124
]
D-8 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .766 i
e
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 84 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 72.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 9.0 >10 >10 >10 110 >10 >10 Integration 76.8 62.6 62.8 62.8 62.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 A-Weighted (-3) 73.8 59.6 59.8 59.8 59.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 Duration (+15.2) 89.0 74.8 75.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 SEL,d8 89.0 74.8 75.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 Fractions Asakened for one .500 .430 .430 .430 .430 .390 .390 .390 For 2 .824 .675 .675 .675 .675 .628 .628 .628 1
For 3 .926 .815 .815 .815 .815 .773 .773 .773 For 4 .969 .894 .894 .894 .894 .862 .862 .862 For Census Fasily .846 .728 .728 .728 .728 .688 .688 .688 l
l HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 .l Z
h Fraction of i Houses Awakened e (Census Family) .301 .117 .026 .019 .043 .073 .055 .122 1
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .755 D-9 i
i SEL CALCULATIONS OF AND Fr R ACT I O N S AIAIA K E N E D (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 83 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors: -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 71.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Background IIcise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 j .S/N Difference >10 8.0 )to >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 75.8 61.4 61.8 61.8 61.8 57.8 57.8 57.8 A-Weighted (-3) 72.8 58.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 54.8 54.8 -. 54. 8
- Duration (+15.2) 80.0 73.6 74.0 74.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 SEL,dB 88.0 73.6 74.0 74.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 Fractions Amalened For one .570 .420 .420 .420 .420 .380 .380 .380 For 2 .815 .H4 .H4 .H4 .H4 .616 .616 .616 For 3 .920 .805 .005 .805 .805 .762 .762 .762 For 4 .9H .887 .887 .887 .887 .852 .852 .852 I
For Census Fasily .839 .719 .719 .719 .719 .677 .677 .677 NOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 k Fraction of Houses Auskened (Census Faeily) .299 .!!5 .026 .019 .042 .072 .054 .120 l
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .747 D-10
, _ . , , _ _ . _ . . - ,~, . . . - . . _ , . . - - . _ .. _ . _ _ ,, . _ , _ . . _ . .
4 f
C A L C LJL AT I O N S O F= SEL.
AND F RACTI ONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 82 DB Condition fan liAs liAo CAn CAf IIAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 I. door Level 70.0 56.0 56.0 .56.0 56.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 . 13 M Difference 110 1.0 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10
- a 74.8 60.4 60.8 60.8 60.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 A-t ighted (-3) 71.8 57.4 57.8 57.8 57.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 Duration (+15.2) 87.0 72.6 73.0 73.0 73.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 SEL,dB 87.0 72.6 73.0 73.0 73.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 Fractions Awakened
- ~ se .560 .410 .410 .410 .410 .370 .370 .370 For 2 .8% .652 .652 .652 .652 .603 .603 .603 For 3 .915 .795 .795 .795 .795 .750 .750 .750 For 4 .963 .879 .879 .879 .879 .842 .842 .842 For Conses Fasily .833 . 709 .709 .709 .709 .666 .6M .6M HOUSIIIE FRAC 7!Dil .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .1% .08 .177 5
Fraction of Houses Amakened (Census Family) .296 .113 .026 .018 .042 .071- .053 .!!8 D-ll TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .737
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND F= R A C T I O N S AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 81 DB Condition fan IIAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 69.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0- 51.0 51.0 51.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference )l0 6.0 110 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 73.8 59.4 59.8 59.8 59.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 A-Weighted (-3) 70.8 56.4 56.8 56.8 56.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 Duration (+15.2) 86.0 71.6 72.0 72.0 72.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 SEL,dB 86.0 71.6 72.0 72.0 72.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 Fractions Amakened For one .550 400 400 .400 .400 .360 .360 .360 For 2 .798 .640 .640 .640 .640 .590 .590 .590 For 3 .909 .784 .784 .784 .784 .738 .738 .738 For 4 .959 .870 .870 .870 .870 .832 .832 .832 For Census Fasily .826 .698 .698 .698 .698 .655 .655 .655 HOUSIN8 FRAC 7 ION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Faeily) .294 .112 .025 .018 .041 .069 .052 .!!6 TOTAL' FRACTION AWAKENED = .728 ,
D-12 l
i
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND f= FR A C T I O N S AWAKENED 1
(BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 80 DB Condition fan As WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 In6oor Level 68.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 Background Noise 40 49 37 28 13 39 2B 13 S/N Difference )to 5.0 >10 >10 )to )to >10 >10 Integration 72.8 58.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 54.6 54.8 54.8 A- :ighted (-3) 69.8 55.4 55.8 55.8 55.8 51.6 51.8 51.8 Duration (+15.2)- 85.0 70.6 71.0 71.0 71.0 66.8 67.0 67.0 SEL,dB 85.0 70.6 71.0 71.0 71.0 66.8 67.0 67.0 Fractions Awakened For one .540 .390 .390 .390 .390 .350 .350 .350 For 2 .788 .628 .628 .628 .628 .577 .577 .577 For 3 .903 .773 .773 .773 .773 .725 .725 .725 For 4 .955 .862 .862 .862 .862 .821 .821 .821 For Census Fasily .819 .688 .688 .688 .688 .643 .643 .643 h
HCUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fasity) .292 .110 .025 .018 .041 .068 .051 .114 D-13
l I
c ;
CALCULATIONS O Fr SEL
-AND F RACT I ONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 79 DB Condition fan WAs NAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 67.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 Background Noise 43 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 4.0 )l0 >10 >10 10.0 >10 >10 Integration 71.8 56.8 57.8 57.8 57.8 53.6 53.8 53.8 A-C;ighted (-3) 68.8 53.8 54.8 54.8 54.8 50.6 50.8 50.8 Duration (+15.2) 84.0 69.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 65.8 66.0 66.0 SEL,dB 84.0 69.0 70.0 73.0 70.0 65.8 66.0 H.0 Fractions Asakened For one .530 .370 .380 .380 .300 .340 .340 .340 For 2 .779 .603 .616 .616 .616 .564 .564 .564 For 3 .896 .750 .762 .762 .762 .713 .713 .713 For 4 .951 .242 .852 .852 .852 .810 .810 .810 For Census Faeily .812 .6% .677 .677 .677 .632 .632 .632 HOUSIN8 FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Hoases Andened (Census Faeily) .289 .107 .024 .018 .040 .067 .051 .112 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .707 D-14
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FrR ACT I ONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 78 DB fan CAf WAo CAn CAf Condition- WAs WAo CAn Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 66.0 52.0 $2.0 52.0 $2.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 3.0 >10 >10 110 9.0 >10 >10 Integration 70.8 55.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 52.6 52.8 52.8 A-Weighted (-3)- 67.8 52.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 49.6 49.8 49.8 Duration (+15.21 83.0 68.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 64.8 65.0 65.0 SEL.dB 83.0 68.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 64.8 65.0 65.0 Fractions Awakened For one .520 .360 .370 .370 .370 .330 .330 .330 For 2 .770 .590 .603 .603 .603 .551 .551 .551 For 3 .889 .738 .750 .750 .750 .699 .699 .699 For 4 .947 .832 .842 .842 .842 .798 .798 .798 For Census Fasily .804 .655 .666 .666 .666 .619 .619 .619 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of ,
Hcuses Awakened (Census Fasityl .286 .105 .024 .017 .039 .066 .050 .110 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .697 i
D-15 L
CALCULATIONS O Fr SEL AND F= R ACT I O N S A pJ A K E N ED
.(BASED.UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 77 DB fan CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Conditica Wes NAo Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 65.0 51.0 51.0 $1.0 51.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 2.0 )l0 >10 110 8.0 )l0 >10 Integration 69.8 53.7 55.8 55.8 55.8 51.4 51.8 51.8 A-Weighted (-3) 66.8 50.7 52.8 52.8 52.8 48.4 48.8 48.8 Duration (+15.2) 82.0 65.9 68.0 68.0 68.0 63.6 64.0 64.0 SEL,dB 82.0 65.9 68.0 68.0 68.0 63.6 64.0 64.0 Fractions f.eakened r
For one .510 .340 .360 .360 .360 .320 .320 .320 For 2 .760 .564 .590 .590 .590 .538 .538 .538 Sr 3 .882 .713 .738 .738 .738 .686 .686 .686
.r 4 .942 .810 .832 .632 .832 .786 .786 .786 For Census Family .797 .632 .655 .655 .655 .607 .607 .607 HOUSIN8 FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 1
iction of
.ceses Awakened (Census Faeily) .284 .101 .024 .017 .039 .064 .049 .107 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .684 D-16 J
CALCULATIONS O Fr SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 75 DB fan WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Condition WAs Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30.
Indoor Level 63.0 a9.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13
$/N Difference >10 .0 10.0 >10 >10 6.0 >10 >10 Integration 67.8 .0 53.6 53.8 53.8 49.4 49.8 49.8 A-teighted (-3) 64.8 .0 50.6 50.8 . 50.8 46.4 46.8 46.8 Duration (+15.21 80.0 .0 65.8 64.0 66.0 61.6 62.0 62.0 SEL,d8 80.0 .0 65.8 66.0 66.0 61.6 62.0 62.0 Fractions Asakened For one .490 .000 .340 .340 .340 .300 .300 .300 For 2 .740 .000 .564 .564 .564 .510 .510 .510 6 For 3 .867 .000 .713 .713 .713 .657 .657 .657 For 4 .932 .000 .810 .810 .810 .760 .760 .760 For Census Fa.ily .781 .000 .632 .632 .632 .581 .581 .581 HOUSINGFRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177
)
i Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Faeily) .278 .000 .023 .016 .037 .062 .046 .103 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .565
- a
-l l
\
D-17
, ~ - - - , --- -
l l
4 l
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 72 DB Condition fan us NAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Less to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 60.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 42.0 42.0 42.0
' 13 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 S/N Difference >10 (0 7.0 >10 >10 3.0 >10 )l0 Integration 64.8 .0 D.4 50.8 50.8 45.8 46.8 46.8 A-Weighted (-3) 61.8 .0 47.4 47.8 47.8 42.8 43.8 43.8 Duration (+15.2) 77.0 .0 62.6 63.0 63.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 SEL,d8 77.0 .0 62.6 63.0 63.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 Fractions Awakened For one 450 .000 .310 .310 .310 .260 .270 .270 For 2 .698 .000 .524 .524 .524 .452 .467 .467 For 3 .834 .000 .671 .671 .671 .595 .611 .611 For 4 .908 .000 .773 .773 .773 .700 .716 .716 For Census Family .747 .000 .594 .594 .594 .525 .539 .539 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Family) .266 .000 .021 .015 .035 .056 .043 .095 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .532 a
j D-18
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AbJ A K EN ED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR HORONJEFF)
I OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 67 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf W4o CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 55.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 (0 2.0 >10 )l0 (0 9.0 >10 Integration 59.8 .0 43.7 45.8 45.8 .0 41.6 41.8 A-Weighted (-3) 56.8 .0 40.7 42.8 42.8 .0 38.6 38.8 Duration (+15.2) 72.0 .0 55.9 58.0 58.0 .0 53.8 54.0 SEL,dB 72.0 .0 55.9 58.0 58.0 .0 53.8 54.0 Fractions Awakened For one . 4M .000 .240 .260 .260 .000 .230 .230 For 2 .640 .000 422 .452 .452 .000 .407 .407 For 3 .784 .000 .561 .595 a 4597 .000~ ' .543' .543 For 4 .870 .0M .666 .700 .700 .000 .648 .648 For Census Faeily .698 .000 .495 .525 .525 .000 .479 .479 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fasity) .249 .000 .018 .014 .031 .000 .038 .085 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .434 i
b o
D-19
_ 4
CALCULATIONS- OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED 1 (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 112 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indcors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 100.0 84.0 86.0 86.0 86.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 huckgroundNoise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 >10 )l0 >10 )to )l0 )l0 >10 Integration 104.8 90.8 90.8 90.8 90.8 86.8 86.8 86.8 A-Weighted (-3) 101.8 87.8 87.6 87.8 87.8 83.8 83.8 83.8 Duration (+15.21 !!7.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 SEL,d8 117.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 Fractions Awakened For one .990 .910 .910 .910 .910 .880 .880 .88 0
For 2 1.000 .992 .992 .992 .992 .986 .986 .98 6
For 3 1.000 .999 .999 .999 .999 .99E .998 .99 8
For 4 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0
F:r Census Faaily .998 .981 .981 .981 .981 .973 .973 .97 3
HOUSING FRAC 7 ION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of 18ouses Awakened C usus Fasity) .355 .157 .035 .026 .058 .103 .078 .17 2
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .904 L
D-20
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 102 DB Condition fan uns WAo CAn CH 'JAo CAn CM Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 90.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 Background Moise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13
$/N Oifference )l0 >10 >10 >10 )l0 >10 )l0 >10 Integration 94.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 76.8 76.8 76.8 A-Weighted 1-3) 91.0 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 73.8 73.8 73.8 Duration H15.21 107.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 SEL,d8 107.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 89.0 89.0 89.0 Fractions Amalened For one .940 .830 .830 .830 .830 .800 .800 .80 0
For 2 .996 .971 .971 .971 .971 .960 .960 .96 0
For 3 1.000 .995 .995 .995 .995 .992 .992 .99 2
For 4 1.000 .999 .999 .999 .999 .998 .998 .99 8
For Census Faeily .938 .959 .959 .959 .959 .949 .949 .94 9
HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Amakened ICensus Fasityl .352 .153 .035 .025 .057 .101 .076 .16 8
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .966
=
D-21.
- 0
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 97 DB Condition fan mas WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CM Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 85.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 67.0 67.0 47.0 lackground Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/NSifference >10 >10 )l0 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 89.8 75.8 75.8 75.8 75.8 71.8 71.8 71.8 A-teighted (-3) 86.8 72.8 72.8 72.8 72.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 Duration (+15.2) '102.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 SEL,d8 102.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 Fractions Amakened For one .900 .780 .700 .780 .780 .750 .750 .75 0
For 2 .990 .952 .952 .952 .952 .938 .938 .93 8
, For 3 .999 .999 .999 .999 .9P9 .984 .984 .98 4 .
For 4 1.000 .998 .998 .998 .998 .996 .996 .99 6
! for Census Family .978 .942 .942 .942 .942 .931 .931 .93 i
N)USIN8 FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Amatened (CensusFamily) .348 .151 .034 .024 .056 .099 .074 .16 5
, TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .951 4
D-22
_______.___________..___________._._________________________._______.___.________._______.__________.._______________.__.__._______._________._________u
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
^
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 92 DB Condition fan WAs #4e CAn CM mao CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 80.0 66.0 64.0 66.0 66.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/NDifference >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 84.8 70.8 70.8 70.8 70.8 66.8 64.8 64.8 A-teighted (-3) 81.b 67.8 67.8 67.8 47.8 63.0 63.8 63.8 Duration (+15.21 97.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 SEL,il 97.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 Fractions Amanened For one .840 .740 .740 .740 .740 .690 .690 .69 0
For 2 .900 .932 .932 .932 .932 .904 .904 .90 4
For 3 .997 .982 .982 .982 .982 .970 .970 .97 0
For 4 1.000 .995 .995 .995 .995 .991 .991 .99 i
For Census Faeily .968 .921 .927 .927 .927 .905 .905 .90 N00 SIN 8 FRACTION .354 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Analened (Census Faeily) .344 .148 .033 .024 .055 .096 .072 .!6 0
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .934 ,
D-23
---__-__,____Q______--__________-__-_____________-________-_.
C A L CUL. A T I O NS O Fr SEL AND F RACT I ONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 90 DB Condition fan tAs WAo CAn CAf W4o CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 78.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 )l0 >10 Integration 82.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 64.8 64.8 64.8 A-Weighted (-3) 79.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 61.8 61.8 61.8 Duration (+15.21 95.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 SEL,dB 95.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 81.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 Fractions Amalened For one .850 .720 .720 .720 .720 .670 .670 .670 For 2 .978 .922 .922 .922 .922 .891 .891 .891 For 3 .997 .978 .978 .978 .978 .964 .964 .964 For 4 .999 .994 .994 .994 .994 .988 .988 .988 For Census Fasily .965 .919 .919 .919 .919 .896 .896 .896 IO! SINS FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (CensusFasity) .343 .147 .033 .024 .054 .095 .072 .159 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .927 D-24 A
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 88 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Less to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 76.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N DiHerence >10 >10 )to )to )l0 >10 >t0 >10 Integration 80.8 66.8 66.8 66.8 66.8 62.8 62.8 62.8 A-teighted (-3) 77.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 63.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 Duration (+15.21 93.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 SEL,dB 93.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 Fractions Awakened eer ene .830 .690 .690 .690 .690 .640 .640 .640
.971 .904 .904 .904 .904 .870 .870 .870 for 3 .995 .970 .970 .970 .970 .953 .953 .953 For 4 .999 .991 .991 .991 .991 .983 .983 .983 For Census Fasily .959 .905 .905 .905 . 905 .881 .881 .881 19USING FRAC 710N .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Faeily) .341 .145 .033 .024 .053 .093 .070 .156 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .915 h D-25
. 4
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 87 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf j Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 75.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 l SIN Difference )l0 >10 >10 )l0 >10 )l0 )l0 >10 1
Integration 79.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 65.8 61.8 61.8 61.8 A-Weighted (-3) 76.8 62.8 62.8 62.8 62.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 Duration 015.21 92.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 SEL,dB 92.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 Fractions Asakened i For one .820 .600 .600 .680 .680 .630 .630 .630 ,
For 2 .968 .898 .898 .898 .898 .863 .863 .863 ,
For 3 .994 .967 .967 .967 .967 .949 .949 .949 For 4 .999 .990 .990 .990 .990 .t81 .981 .981 For Census Fastly .956 .901 .901 .901 .901 .875 .875 .875 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Faeily) .340 .144 .032 .023 .053 .093 .070 .155 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .911 D-26 1
l
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A ____ - __________________n
C A L_ C U L A T I O N S OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 85 DB Condition fan H4s No CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 73.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N DiHarence )l0 10.0 >10 >10 )l0 )l0 )l0 )l0 Integration 77.8 63.6 63.8 63.8 63.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 A-Weighted (-3) 74.8 60.6 60.8 60.8 60.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 Duration (+15.21 90.0 75.8 76.0 76.0 76.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 SEL,dB 90.0 75.8 76.0 76.0 76.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 Fractions Amakened For one .800 .650 .650 .650 .650 .610 .610 .610 For 2 .960 .878 .878 .818 .878 .848 . .848 .848 For 3 .992 .957 .957 .957 .957 .941 .941 .941 For 4 .998 .985 .985 .985 .985 .977 .977 .977 For Census Faeily .949 .886 .886 .886 .886 .864 .864 .864 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Housts Awakened (Census Faeily) .338 .142 .032 .023 .052 .092 .069 .153 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .900 e
D-27 a-a ' l
r
. . I l
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND F RACT I ONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 84 DB Condition fan WAs NAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 72.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 9.0 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 76.8 62.6 62.8 62.8 62.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 A-Weighted (-3) 73.8 59.6 59.8 59.8 59.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 Duration (+15.21 89.0 74.8 75.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 SEL,dB 09.0 74.8 75.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 Fractions Awakened For one .790 .640 .440 .640 .640 .590 .590 .590 For 2 .956 .870 .870 .870 .870 .832 .832 .832 For 3 .991 .953 .953 .953 .953 .931 .931 .931 For 4 .998 .983 .983 .983 .983 .972 .972 .972 For Census Family .946 .881 .881 .881 .881 .852 .852 .852 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Mcuses Awakened (Census Fasity) .337 .141 .032 .023 .052 .090 .068 .151 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .893 2
s D-28
_ a >
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS A pJ AKEN ED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 83 DB Condition fan WAs NAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 71.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N DiHerence >10 8.0 )l0 >10 >10 >10 )l0 >10 Inte8 ration 75.8 61.4 61.8 61.8 61.8 57.8 57.8 57.8 A-Weighted (-3) 72.8 58.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 54.9 54.8 54.8 Duration (+15.2) 88.0 73.6 74.0 74.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 SEL,dB 88.0 73.6 74.0 74.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 Fractions Awakened For oce .790 .630 .630 .630 .630 .500 .580 .580 For 2 .956 .863 .863 .863 .863 .824 .824 .824 For 3 .991 .949 .949 .949 .949 .926 .926 .926 For 4 .998 .981 .981 .981 .981 .969 .969 .969 For Census Faeily .946 .875 .875 .875 .875 .846 .646 .844 HOUSINGFRACTION .354 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Faeily) .337 .140 .032 .023 .052 .090 .068 .150 1
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .890 L.
1 D-29
- J
C AL__C U L A T I O N S O Fr S E l._
AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
- OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL
- 82 DB Condition fan Was WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf
- Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -24 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 70.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 .56.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 20 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 7.0 )l0 )l0 >10 )l0 )l0 )l0 Integration 74.8 60.4 60.8 60.8 60.8 56.8 56.8 56.8 A-Weighted I-3) 71.8 57.4 57.8 57.0 57.8 53.8 53.8 53.8 Duration (+15.21 87.0 72.6 73.0 73.0 13.0 69.0 49.0 69.0 SEL,d8 87.0 72.6 73.0 73.0 73.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 Fractions Aeakened For one .780 .610 .620 .620 .620 .570 .570 .570 hr 2 .952 .848 .856 .856 .856 .815 .815 .815 l for 3 .989 .941 .945 .945 .945 .920 .920 .920 i
For 4 .998 .977 .979 .979 .979 .9M .9M .966 l For Census Faeily .942 .864 .870 .870 .870 .839 .839 .839 WUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .1% .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Amatened (Census Family) .335 .138 .031 .023 .051 .089 .067 .149 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .883 .
k
! D-30 L -.__________________________n__ 0
- __ _
CALCULAT* IONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 81 DB Condition fan WAs WAo CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 69.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference 110 6.0 )l0 >10 >10 >10 >10 >10 Integration 73.8 59.4 59.8 59.8 59.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 A-Weighted (-3) 70.0 56.4 56.8 56.8 56.8 52.8 52.8 52.0 Duration (+15.2) 84.0 71.6 72.0 72.0 72.0 ,0. 0 68.0 68.0 SEL,d8 84.0 71.6 72.0 72.0 12.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 Fractions Asakened For one .770 .600 .610 .610 .610 .560 .560 .540 For 2 .947 .840 .848 .848 .848 .8% . 8M .8%
For 3 .988 .936 .941 .941 .941 .915 .915 .915 For 4 .997 .974 .977 .977 .977 .963 .963 .963 For Census Faeily .939 .858 .864 .864 .864 .833 .833 .P13 NOUSIN8 FRAC 7!0N .354 .16 .036 .026 .059 .1% .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Amatened (CensusFaeily) .334 .137 .031 .022 .051 .088 .M7 .147 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .878 i e
A D-31 g' .
i . .
l l
l l
CALCULATIONS O Fr SEL AND F R ACT I ONS. AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN) l OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 80 DB Cor.dition fan u4s uAs CAn CM une CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 30 -30 -30 indoorLevel 68.0 54.0 54.0 34.0 54.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 Bactersund noise S/N Dilforente )l0 5.0 )l0 >10 )l0 >10 >10 >10 Integration 72.8 58.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 54.6 54.8 54.8 A-teighted (-3) 69.8 55.4 55.8 55.8 55.8 51.6 51.8 31.8 Duration (*15.21 85.0 70.6 71.0 71.0 71.0 64.8 67.0 67.0 SEL,dl 85.0 70.6 71.0 11.0 71.0 66.8 67.0 67.0 Fractions Asakened For one .760 .590 .590 .590 .590 .5# .540 .540 For 2 .942 .832 .832 .832 .832 .788 .788 .788 For 3 .986 .931 .931 .931 .931 .903 .903 .903 For 4 .997 .972 .972 .972 .972 .955 .955 .955 For Census Feetly .935 .852 .852 .852 .852 .819 .819 .819 HOUSINIFRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .1% .00 .177 Fraction of Houses Amanened (CensusFaellyi .333 .134 .031 .022 .0$0 .007 .%4 .145 l
l e
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .869 D-32 i__a-_-_--___________________________________________________. ___. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
F CALCULATIONS OF SEL.
I AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 79 DB Condition fan us NAo CAn CH M4e CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 l IndoorLevel 67.0 $3.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 Background noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Dilforence >10 4.0 )to >10 >10 10.0 >10 >10 Integration 71.8 56.0 57.8 57.8 $7.8 53.6 53.8 53.1 A-metthted 1-3) 68.1 53.8 54.0 54.I 54.1 50.6 50.8 50.8 Owatton (+15.21 84.0 69.0 70.0 10.0 70.0 65.8 H.0 6.'. 0 SEL,el H.0 69.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 65.8 H.0 H.0 FractionsAealened i
For one .750 .570 .5M .500 .500 .530 .530 .530 For 2 .938 .815 .824 .824 .024 .779 .779 .779 For 3 .984 .920 .926 .926 .926 .896 .996 .996 For 4 .996 .9H .969 .969 .969 .951 .951 .951 For ceases Fastly .931 .039 .546 .046 .846 .012 .012 .412 l HOUSIN6FRACTIQn .356 .!6 .036 .026 .059 . lM .08 .177 l
Fraction of Hostes Aealened (CensusFaelly) .331 .134 .030 .022 .450 .004 .M5 .144 l
l TOTAL FRACTION AWAVENED = .863 l D-33 l
l
_0 -
! CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN) -
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 78 DB Condition fan uns nae CAn CM MAe Ct.n CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level M.0 $2.0 $2.0 52.0 52.0 40.0 40.0 44.0 fackground fictie 40 49 39 28 13 39 20 13 5/N Dilterence >10 3.0 )l0 )l0 >10 9.0 >10 )l0 latogration 70.8 55.8 56.0 56.8 56.8 52.6 52.8 52.8 A-teighted ( 3) 67.I 52.1 53.1 53.8 53.8 49.6 49.B 49.8 Duration 415.2) 13.0 64.0 69.0 49.0 69.0 64.0 65.0 65.0 SEL,di 13.0 68.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 e4.8 65.0 65.0 Fractions Aeanened For one .740 .560 .570 .570 .570 .520 .520 .520 I For 2 .932 .8% .615 .Ill .815 .770 .770 '.770 For 3 .982 .915 .920 .920 .920 .009 .999 .009 For 4 .995 .963 .9M .9M .9M .947 .947 .947 j
For Censas Faeily .927 .833 .I39 .139 .839 .004 .004 .M4 l
HOUSINGFRACf!04 .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .lM .00 .177 l
Fractionof Houses Amatened (CensusFaelly) .330 .133 .030 .022 .050 .005 .M4 .142 l TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .857 l
l .
7 l
I D-34
r CALCULATIONS OFr SEL-AND Fr R ACT I O N S AWAl<ENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 77 DB Condition fan uns WAo CAn CH uno CAn CM Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 65.0 $1.0 51.0 51.0 $1.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference )l0 2.0 >10 >10 >10 8.0 >10 )l0 Integration 69.8 53.7 55.8 55.8 55.8 51.4 51.8 51.0 A-meighted I-3) 66.8 50.7 52.8 52.0 52.1 48.4 48.8 48.8 Beration (+15.21 82.0 65.9 68.0 H.0 W.0 63.6 64.0 64.0 SEL,dI O2.0 65.9 H.0 H.0 68.0 63.6 64.0 64.0 Fractions Aealened For one .730 .530 .560 .560 .560 .500 .510 .510 For 2 .927 .779 .IM .8% .8% .750 .760 .760 For 3 .980 .896 .915 .915 .915 .875 .882 .882 For 4 .995 .951 .963 .o63 .963 .938 .942 .942 For Census Fasily .923 .812 .133 .833 .833 .709 .797 .797 WOUSIN8 FRAC 710N .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .1% .00 .177 Fraction of Houses Aeakened j (CensusFastly) .329 .130 .030 .022 .049 .084 .M4 .141 l TO FAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .840 i
D-35 L_____________.__.__._______ ____._m
CALCULATIONS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 75 DB Condition fan #4s WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 63.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 2B 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 .0 10.0 >10 >10 6.0 >10 >10 Integration 67.8 .0 53.6 53.8 53.8 49.4 49.8 49.8 A-Weighted (-3) 64.8 .0 50.6 50.8 50.8 ~3.4 46.8 46.8 Duration (+15.21 80.0 .0 65.8 66.0 66.0 61.6 62.0 62.0 SEL,dB 80.0 .0 65.8 66.0 66.0 61.6 62.0 62.0 Fractions Aeakened For one .710 .000 .530 .530 .530 .400 .480 .480 For 2 .916 .000 .779 .779 .779 .730 .73b .730 4
For 3 .976 .000 .896 .896 .896 .859 .859 .859 For 4 .993 .000 .951 .951 .951 .927 .927 .927 For Census Fasily .914 .000 .812 .812 .812 .773 .773 .773 HOUSING FRACTI(Ni .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fasity) .326 .000 .029 .021 .048 .082 .062 .137 1
l TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .704 .)
7 k
l l D-36 I i
l
s C ALCU L_ AT I O NS OF SEL AND FRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 72 DB Conditise fan WAs WAo CAn CAf WAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 IndoorLevel 60.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 (0 7.0 >10 >10 3.0 >10 >10 integration 64.8 .0 50.4 50.8 50.8 45.8 46.8 46.8 A-Neighted (-3) 61.8 .0 47.4 47.8 47.8 42.8 43.8 43.8 Duration (+15.21 77.0 .0 62.6 63.0 63.9 58.0 59.0 59.0 SEL,d8 77.0 .0 62.6 63.0 63.0 54.0 59.0 59.0 Fractions Awakened For one .670 .000 .490 .490 .490 .430 .450 .450 For 2 .991 .000 .740 .740 .740 .675 .698 .698 For 3 .964 .000 .867 .867 .867 .815 .834 .834 For 4 .988 .000 .932 .932 .932 .894 .908 .908 For Census Family .896 .000 .781 .781 .781 .728 .747 .747 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .00 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Family) .319 .000 .028 .020 .046 .077 .060 .132 TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .68' D-37 h
I CALCULATIONS O fr SEL AND IRACTIONS AWAKENED (BASED UPON BOARD FIG. 1 FOR KRALLMANN)
OUTDOOR SOUND LEVEL: 67 DB Condition fan NAs WAo CAn CAf NAo CAn CAf Loss to indoors -12 -26 -26 -26 -26 -30 -30 -30 Indoor Level 55.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Background Noise 40 49 39 28 13 39 28 13 S/N Difference >10 (0 2.0 >10 >10 (0 9.0 >10
!ategration 59.8 .0 43.7 45.8 45.8 .0 41.6 41.8 A-Weigated (-3) 56.8 .0 40.7 42.8 42.8 .0 38.6 38.8 Duration (+15.2) 72.0 .0 55.9 58.0 58.0 .0 53.8 54.0 SEL,dB 72.0 .0 55.9 '8.0 58.0 .0 53.8 54.0 Fract. as Asakened For one .610 .000 .410 .430 .430 .000 .380 .390 For 2 .848 .000 .652 .675 .675 .000 .616 .628 For 3 .941 .000 .795 .815 .815 .000 .762 .773 For 4 .977 .000 .879 .894 .894 .000 .852 .862 For Census Fasily .864 .000 .709 .728 .728 .000 .677 .688 HOUSING FRACTION .356 .16 .036 .026 .059 .106 .08 .177 Fraction of Houses Awakened (Census Fasity) .308 .000 .026 .019 .043 .000 .054 .122 e
TOTAL FRACTION AWAKENED = .571 D-38
ATTACHENT E-VARIOUS ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLDS AWAKEED BY SIRENS WITHIN 5 MILES OF TE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT (does not include those already awake) l Total No. Percent Awakened of Houses Lukas Horonjerr Kra11mam Board Order 363 - 62.8% 81.5% i By Applicant
- 1. Using Board Count of EX 46 and all of Board Assumptions 363 - 65.5% 81.5% l l
l
- 2. Using Applicant Count of EX 46 and all of Board Assumptions 428 -
66.8% 82.5%
- 3. Using Applicant )
Count of EX 46 and Applicant Methods
- 428 70.3% 76.6% 90%
- 4. Using Applicant Count of Large Maps and Applicant Methods
- 589 69.4% 75.9% 89.6%
l k
Except for the use of Horonjeff and Krallmam in place of Lukas where indicated.
- ll62/0644c
,~
e ATTACHMENT F ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLDS AWAKEED BY SIRENS WITHIN 5 MILES OF TIE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT (using Horonjeff Curve from Board Figure 1)
Horonjeff (Board Figure 1)
Nominal Siren Total # No. or Sound Level of Houses Fraction Houses t-Sound Level Zones Outdoors Within 5 mi. Awakened Awakened
> 105 cB 112 dB 23 .928 21 100-105 102 24 .886 21 95-100 97 27 .858 23 90-95 92 58 .822 48 2 x 85-90 90 0 .808 0 80-85 + 85-90; 2 x 75-80 + 85-90 88 2 .791 2 85-90 87 79 .783 62 2 x 80-85 85 3 .766 2 2 x 75-80 + 80-85 84 0 .755 0 75-80 + 80-85; 3 x 70-75 + 80-85 83 40 .747 30 80-85; 3 x 75-80 82 154 .737 113 2 x 70-75 + 2 x 75-80 81 0 .728 0 2 x 75-80; 3 x 70-75 + 75-80 80 21 .718 15 2 x 70-75 + 75-80 79 24 .707 17 70-75 + 75-80 78 93 .697 65 75-80; 3 x 70-75 77 32 .684 22 2 x 70-75 75 8 .565 5 70-75 72 1 .532 1
< 70 67 0 .434 0 l
TOTALS: 589 447 1 Percentage 75.9%
k O
I ll62/0644c -
o .- . l l
l ATTACHENT G l ESTIMATES OF HOUSEHOLDS AWAKENEO BY SIRENS WITHIN 5 MILES OF TIE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT (using Krallmann Curve from Board Figure 1)
Krallmam (Board Figure 1)
Nominal Siren Total # No. OT Sound Level of Houst3 Fraction Houses Sound Level Zones Outdoors Within 5 ni. Awakened Awakened
> 105 dB 112 dB 23 .984 23 100-105 102 24 .966 23 95-100 97 27 .951 26 90-95 92 58 .934 54 2 x 85-90 90 0 .927 0 80-85 + 85-90; 2 x 75-80 + 85-90 88 2 .915 2 85-90 87 79 .911 72 2 x 80-85 85 3 .900 3 2 x 75-80 + 80-85 84 0 .893 0 75-80 + 80-85; 3 x 70-75 + 80-85 83 40 .890 36 80-85; 3 x 75-80 82 154 .883 136 2 x 70-75 + 2 x 75-80 81 0 .878 0 2 x 75-80; 3 x 70-75 + 75-80 80 21 .869 18 2 x 70-75 + 75-80 79 24 .863 21 70-75 + 75-80 78 93 .857 80 75-80; 3 x 70-75 77 32 .848 27 2 x 70-75 75 8 .704 6 70-75 72 1 .683 1
< 70 67 0 .571 0 TOTALS: 589 528 Percentage 89.6%
i s
ll62/0644c a
e se -.
- -)' ?.', in,- ;'.pf - '
- s. O 3,
. :.r ,
o._ . - C.__ .t., . .
- y.'*** sm E ,=
- ./ ; '. . T, .
- P
' i N
!<r L
' . ,./ \ < . '\ . .\
ATTACWENT H
.. 1 -l'/K
.i. mrt
,. -~. . -
. r. .
.\ . .,. "
z.m .
g - .
1.
es , ;/. .-
s e , .- .
s .I
.e. ,
/{. *-
N, g - , <g. . ..
,. * . N. <
ss - .\ * ',e\. ,
.y,A,
, g . .i.m
- 4. j .*,',e' .4i
't . ..g .\
i,.s ss
. \ .. .\.-
g . . /. .- .
..g g.
N. .
/. -. .,. . . ,
...- . .I. .- - /.29 -~~,~"""y -
- N .,/
.x#
e
- )( . * , . . ..\.f,
. g- f. ...i. - , .
- ..g--.1.. , 1
'==%'%..,,,t .,
, ,'i ,N,,, . ." ,
s' ..y - r . ,.... ::-~ g... . . .j~ ./
,,/,pi . s, s .s.;
r a .- . .
.\.. N , ,s./ . .. .-
3 ..
.. o
.. . . . .[\ - .\
".... ,. ,,,,.- i .. ... .. . . ; v . -.,e,.. . ,
.s '
e-- . -j. ,. ~.
,< s
, y-
.N ;g fN / , s .f ..\ .,
' 310'
!.,. h,,. s gy f.. ', ,,
..l,'.- " ... . 'r. . a- ~.. . ";.. .i . . . . . .., - l .. . i .t.
./.,,<. .
,... . . ' . . , . r.n,. .
,. .s s
7.. .-, - .... -g.,. , .. i. ..,.. ,
, .s. s , . se i. ..s f
<.19. . .
s,,N f.
, '. . ,r sf.*N.
N . /.
, - /(
- ((3/ Q ' . /..s' .. -r .-
. 'f ,
, . k< ,
j,. './ .
- a. .,r.'.
. ,t
.., .'.,i ., , .- / s .j .s,,
.w,.,
y, v. . . . . . . - .
.,f y; ,
...7.,-.-,--..... .
.s,s s . .
/
,- . f. . g ,,.,,
- .s. . .
/ .-
/.s . / <f.
i . .r s *v
. V ... .re . ., . -
x
. \E,. ' .~ , ~ ~ ,,. ..; - . . r ..,, 1 t ! T / .f 't .. .e 'N, s' . '/. ' N/
N ,,j
[NJl s s , */, 'N/ff ~ , . . \ /* . .
,4 . a. . . - r p +. . 7.-- . . . t ," . . 6 .,e . . .f . , ,.,
.s, , E - c .,,/ -
V W .& ,s;sc '.
^'
- M. ,'t, ? ~~'---- .s,' j. ~ . s, y
- ' .f
.' ' .s's..'Qx ,. . . .: ' N,,. * ' / . a ,1 .'% .
.s .i 7...lll
..i py '-
.W.*r*~t . f.,
v,N x' /
L x-
/ . , / ..-.. '-- -
f .-}lep
- l. f. /' 4 .-\..'%;.Q.?:fkr'?'-h-- [ lS.. " J ~k:l ll7'--).f.;.s l l }j.'si:' . .
%' : ay. . t -
/ y .
.i-- %& ? '. % ./.
~..',V
.w .[I ~ !: ./J sp.. s :/'
%: . r t ,q%h: .'
+ :. < i . x; .. / .
- .a- 't
\. .mg .
L -o <
x,.;- %. 'k pqy - . ~. ,%, ,. .: ,,; x %
...,..m..'
- . , ,; . a . .
w
. .c 20'p;r ;'s.' :: ;. .' y . .s:~';;. -
l, :~ 'N. .s.! .J. . T. -t k. - .' ..
- . \ . /\.. . - ) . ..yr .} . .t
- T". t...t '
/ a!.
~. ./
s/s...;s..
. . ~~, g/ , /
M , s;.~
^
- 2.j
- JS. i . . :%:;f'..'../d<'h.lL
/
f.%l 2 l : . ~. ' L ' ' \G902'l- :' .:; . y. ' ', ). K. * ~. %
- t-::r. '
w < ;. .::ll69:~r.+ 't'%.9 I: 3.
- y. ~ /
. :.; ., :. ;~.. n i
~, :
. y\p,c
\x V_, l ,: .- ..a l, i;y,
\.
, . /. Y. . ' \>. . .;
ew.
7.;.
- .. Cy-..
. +
% 't G :--
sL .: >: m=.'.n: % %
- '% ~;
- ' . 's;. .
.- ' .$. . y: y: y/c N (. . p'~
\* \ .:.-
' * ^"
- r. . -. . . . .Y b!.$.
.m.w
- .L
- . ! r cg.
s
- m---..,b, . _..q:'. -s : :. _.
a
I i- . '. MrM ;- : .i ~ .
- r-- J. : ; 0.: . .5 I W 1 %. .,i,e,v.. / i m . ~% s.~ s .s.. z. ~.'0 --..'5'9. YR-3;;r.j.
- a. . .
l.
- . . . . s.
-- w. . .. . .- ..\ - p. s;s
(, ~
/
t,w,: . . g.. -
L.,-
3.q*;<; /.... Q.:h'.\;-..\ pb.:.@mf//.
'~s .uT'" :..~~tyv .:. ;
q GQ.5, *.- .
co'bj**: : T ". *;,: -%.s...
.,',':iTJ C .;< c: 4 ..i~~~ 4 .~s;. i z?i .,. :
/.,. , g.4.., , . . . j., .N;/N,2 ,.
- . ~, ,. i
~. . . y. ..
i .7, ,
_ yf - .,- , - -
, , i*
- c. > ,.3. ,, s .
.; . s, .
6 h
, ~.-
%.i. .,~- ~. , y.
.,ss,.r.. s.
s.
. . , . . ,s. .s
);.s,t,
. . 3_ , . .' . y \. _.
(.. . . . .gi' . .. \A. . .[3 y
. . . .3. .
- y. .x ~, , ,s
..! . .N T , ..N
- . ! ~ .;,
/f .
<. . , ' , , - .,,"*J.-+-.t '
-~ .
,.,.r.~ _......./
.sy..,,,.',..,.
- -\ . , ..
,/.
ses
.;. s,, . . ,p. . L_ . L
- s. *v%./ .
'~ .,,: , n, ;;.7 -
...,.s... . .. ... -. . .
e
.,...y. . .
...i . 5. , r.v, .
.,s .
- s1>.
(n ... .. . .. .. ... c,. ,..; ,'. ...
~.,;, , .. . -
. . - ,.\. .
. ,;s. . /...^.s, .. .s . s; wy,r,
.; . ~1
. .,f ... ,.. M.
..s /
.i.
s . . ,i .~ :s. y..;,s. .-
t (x\;.. n. f... *.-
qs:-
... .e.;.
. . ' ./s.;s; ../-; ~ , .. ;...;.. .. .,1% ' 3 .[ . .. .\ -:.. -. _., .. '3. ,
. . . y, .p.
~
y i .;. l3
.,: :~ ,_. N. , 1
.~.
.: /
.f.~ 1. .~ . .l .- % n.
f-'[p y. . )/. . ., < .:.:/' /- x ~ . . . y., ;; ~ , .l . n.y. . ~.
3, . .q.c..: c. g: . q.. g . 'k..
~. si . .. * . \. . ' /s A g .f.;\. 7..,7.yl . ;y,
. ., . h. N. c'. . ,,
. . S.' / J3l. .
., j; f , ./..' s,;4 / s f.,/ ;~g,3.... ,
- s
- ..
...i. ..
.$. ;I
,..,<i.. .. x . . . r..~t.. . 3 ,. ..
g..
n ./ .
x
/ .;/. .. /.
- ;f. s; . f
,.,u
. . .;m ~'~ r
.s.>- ,
- \.
~z . ,
L .';.,- ..x . ;q k' .
.,/ .g.. . ;/. ' g, .
.;~.
.. .. ~
l~.:
. . n . .
\ . $. .\. . .
- y. . .
~y
- i_.. .
' +; :
l'. ~
- .,) ' ,
- x &. :.r. -a.:- (c.Ml.Q.. . ..A. ,,. 3 ..'/-. . '~/ h ,..:N . ,r . ,: . - I' R,,.'.
. r..\ . / . ,
' /
,s f .
,~..l/.~'.'v*I:lX;'.l..'J....i
. ~ . .. .
~. H. .,.g&
k B o t Y :A.3/22Al ' ~ ,
%Q . .;3- /.,/-; -
.-d .
- x. .,.
fi _ ' .&. 'y. s:,,. ;/ .D/MCYli//7'Y N. ?l. 'HUNDE .,
~x s,
i s,
< P.;i 77,9// " \- Y;/. ;
_/ .(!:~ i: g . g j m pgg y Q / _,.-; ,
, *']
', q .
- 5 *"..
i.. . , ~ ' . '*
. i~ -
^
L. . ,/ ~
., R, .., O-brf:s'.. tdan.h.}<.,5o/fzL:Yp.w.n..w.Q.:n.n',.
. . . t. .C .. . .'M
.5
./
1,-./ : ' ,
' ?, , . 6y,n,h.s.3, n.. v
. l' -
..'\ O .-,
\
...f./*. ::,
s;,.-
1 n . . i.
/ . %, .
~
. 1 ,
- f .
j
,,i,.
L, ~. s .. *.~ .
.. ...._....:.,.=..... cf j, . 3 3; _..'. . .
. +. .- ~. .. :
< . .. - . w : . ., -.......:. . .
,. ;,.. .. o; ;.... ...
- n. -- ) . *. g *n ' g.y .
s e vj
e se a i e t ? , i e ei 6 i , , . i
- i t i ! ! e i e i . . . i i
, e e i . 6 , !j i .... ti.I i . # 6 6 i 1 e i i i 6 i 6 ++! . i
. a ! . i 6 ii i ai ! e i 6 , i a i . e i i , , , e
. e 6 l i i ii i .ii i e i i i i 6 i I . * *
. 6 i i 6
. , .i ,
, e e & i j j j t i t i I !
I
, . i .., . . , t ij i i e . .
1 ., f W
, _A %
i . I i i t i en i
. . . s e g
i i I i . . .
. i e ! . i i
]; a E Jp t
Wh\ _l. '
. . .N E.i Mt- i i i ' 'V'
. , i ! e i i t i,ii i e i I m e J A .
i i ' 4
_,__ i / ) i e i . ,
3 r ,, - r . , , ,. . i , ,. , , i ,;, N d i M7~ . -
. N
- i i hI e ' + i i t d J e. . . ti" -4 I ! ! ! ! i a e 11 i
'* ,gy 3, -
i - , _T . .. t A
3 .- i . i e h h -- u~ Y i f l t i i
=
m.
m-x i i i , , , , i .
.-.P .__g _4 W f]
uwp D'$ ",
.L
?
1 N~' E m# / 4'
% , T e i r
s \_ -1 C
.g tL a .. <
O i N d
{ N Mak._ M 2 r +
r Z d % s n 3$ _1__ _J i T g e O
e , .t m J(1 J A i
- I a A N %
g
- ct _ __ _ _. j %e
---o a
, p
_i.~_~.
h i i I i
. . F ~**. . _ .
i j . . . . [ .
c : -'
i a r s
- :* W i
i t
. eii r .
~i I
e j
3 Er m
'h r_- -
e i . ] , w p i ! .
CW). G
. i i i i ._ i . . , , ~
! ' Y _I Nu 7 i 4 i
Lf 8 m -
I ca n
. h f . - . _
- s
. Q dt O l{ m
. _j . 9L !Q.
. * ! _i i ~f-N h? h~ -
m-E T '
I ^
. 6 ,,. e , . . . .,
.. . . i , , , j .
. i . ,e a i j . i i , . _ . i . , , i , . ,
i 6 i i . . .
i , i i
. i i i i i i . . q i I . .
/ : i . i . , . , 1 . . 6 ;)
i i ff i i + e t . i e e e i
... i 4 . I i .
I l l t .! . . . i e i f? 4 i j i i e i i! e i ! . i i !I i i t . I e 6 i . I t . i j i , ! i , i . ! , e , 6 . . . I i l 4 . d. . i . . . 4 . 3 i . I
~
t . ' . t .
I ! ! , ! t . ' . i e,t t )
!i. i . . . , i . . . , , i !
i . i . , . , . , i ,,,i , i , i I , i
. 8 1 : 4, l ! i 4
. . j e j .6 3
. 4 i ! i 6 e s . 4 . *4
- s*. e
! 4 ' i 1 '
i t j J l i . I e i . . i f f i i ) . i . i g_ ,g._
g . . s s . , a n
- T, q M M s '
g "1b t
', RELATED CORRESPONDENCFi DOCMETED February 21,198gSNRC 1k5 FEB 24 N1:47 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - 0FFICE LF Si. . I/.7 00CKETinu a STF/lCL BRANCH BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY )
and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN ) Docket No. 50-400.0L MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY )
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power )
Plant) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Additional Testimony of David N. Keast on Eddleman 57-C-3 (Night-Time Notification)"
and Applicants' Ex. (" Revised Map, Shearon Harris Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone: Siren Locations, Nighttime Siren Coverage Contours and House Locations") were served this 21st day of February, 1986, by deposit in the U.S.
mail, first class, postage prepaid, to the parties on the attached Service List.
A% ,
Thomas A. Baxter, P.C.
, 1 e 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J 1
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-400 OL and NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN )
MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY )
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power )
Plant) )
SERVICE LIST James L. Kelley, Esquire John D. Runkle, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Conservation Council of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission North Carolina Washington, D.C. 20555 307 Granville Road Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr. Glenn O. Bright M. Travis Payne, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Edelstein and Payne U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 12607 Washington, D.C. 20555 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Dr. James H. Carpenter Dr. Richard D. Wilson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 729 Hunter Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Apex, North Carolina 27502 Washington, D.C. 20555 Charles A. Barth, Esquire Mr. Wells Eddleman Janice E. Moore, Esquire 806 Parker Street Office of Executive Legal Director Durham, NC 27701 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Docketing and Service Section Richard E. Jones, Esquire Office of the Secretary Vice President and Senior Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Carolina Power & Light Company Washington, D.C. 20555 P.O. Ecx 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. Daniel F. Read, President Dr. Linda W. Little CHANGE Governor's Waste Management Board P.O. Box 2151 513 Albemarle Building Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 325 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
--- --- --- - ~ __ , ,wy ., ,qm__.- y 9y, ,e,, - = . , .pw,m_-.,-r.g
o i
9 Bradley W. Jones, Esquire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marrietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ,
Mr. Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC P.O. Box 991 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Jo' Anne Sanford, Esquire Special Deputy Attorney General P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Joseph Flynn, Esquire FEMA 500 C Street, S.W., suite 480 Washington, D.C. 20740 Steven Rochlis, Esquire Regional Counsel FEMA 1371 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
l OVERSIZE DOCUMENT ~
PAGE PULLED SEE APERTURE CARDS ,
NUMBER OF PAGES: k.
ACCESSION NUMBER (S):
maassoaeca-ol APERTURE CARD /HARD COPY AVAILABLE FROM RECORD SERVICES BRANCH,TIDC FTS 492-3939
. - - - - - - - - - . . . . , . _ , _ , _ _ . - - , . . - - , . _ . , - _ _ _ . . . _ . - _ . . . _ . . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _