ML20153E466
| ML20153E466 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 08/16/1988 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153E393 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-88-24, NUDOCS 8809060328 | |
| Download: ML20153E466 (2) | |
Text
.
l' 1
I APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-54 During an NRC inspection conducted on July 19-22, 1988, one violation of NRC l-requirements whs identified.
In'accordance with the "General Statement of
- /
Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actiona,".10 CFR Part.2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:
A.
Technical,$pecification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained, and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.
The licensee's Radiation Protection Manual, established pursuant to the sbove Technical Specification, procedure RP-305, Article 2 states, in part, "An example of responsibilities of all radiation workers follows:..
3.-. Wear TLD/ film badges when required by procedure, RWP or radiation Protection Personnel...." Procedure RP 305.4 Section 6.6.2 states, in part, "It is the responsibility of t
all perso'nnel using an RWP to familiarize themselves with radiological conditions listed, protective clothing, dosimetry required...."
Contrary to the above, on July 20, 1988, an individual did not wear a TLD badge req'Jired by RWP No. 88-021A while working in the grade level decon room.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement IV).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Sacramento Municipal Utility District. is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and 4
a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted.
(2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid j
further violations, and (4) the date, when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequnte reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, L
i i
I 8809060328 800816 PDR ADOCK 0$000s312 o
ec
r~.
- ?
e
{-
js.
i r,
, v
/
.7 e
./'
2-suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be given to exter, ding'the response time for good cause snown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION y-
..'eu
_Mr G. P.(Yuias, Chief
'/
Emergencj Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Dated this day of ldfr,1988 at Walnut Creek, California t
s
{
^ 6
(
'\\
s f
f 3
5 r
l I
h i
r t
T
-?-
,-.e----
., - - ~ -, -, - - - - -
r-----,---
,-n-- - -
---,nn.--..,,,,--,w
-r,
-an,n, -, -
rv
-n-~--~-
, - -