ML20151V626

Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $800.Violation Based on Inattentive Behavior

ML20151V626
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom, 05506827
Issue date:	08/09/1988
From:	Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Hoopes R PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20151V629	List: ML20151V626 ML20151V638
References
EA-88-015, EA-88-15, NUDOCS 8808220334
Download: ML20151V626 (4)

Text

o UNITED STATES g

4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

i .

37, , ej WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

\e.../

Docket No. 55-6827 09 Al)B 1988 License No. 50P-10336-1 EA 88-15 Mr. Robcrt R. Hoopes .

IEIGNAT9 031GDAL HOME ADDRESS DELETED r M i UNDER 10 CFR 2.790 ;Certincd Iy (o w ( M w Mn

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF YIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY In March 1987, the NRC received information .L control room operators at Philadelohia Electric Company's Peach Botton. ! wie Power Station had been observed' sleeping while on duty in the controi room, reading materials not directly job related, and being otherwise inattentive to the obligations of their licenses. The NRC promptly confirmed this information during the initial -

phase of an investigation of this matter. As a result, the NRC no longer had reasonable assurance that the facility would be operated in a manner to assure that the health and safety of the public would be protected, and therefore issued an Order to Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) on March 31, 1987 I suspeMing operations of the Peach Bottom reactors, effective imediately. l l

Subsequently, the NRC found that the inattentiveness described in the Order had I occurred over an extended period of time and was pervasive. Other examples of inattentive behavior not known at the time of the Order were also identified, such as: control room personnel being routinely reclined in a resting position j with their heads back and eyes closed for indeterminate periods of time, play-ing hand held computer games or video games on one of the computer display screens in the control room, and engaging in horseplay. Operators were aware of these conditions and failed to take action to correct them. As a result of i l

these findings, the NRC conducted an enforcement conference with you on February 16, 1988 for the surpose of discussing your understanding of (1) these inattentiveness issues, (2) tmir safety significance, (3) their causes, and (4) corrective actions taken by both you and the utility to prevent recurrence. During that conference, you specifically admitted to your personal involvement in at least some of this inattentive behavior. Your actions constituted a violation of your individual senior reactor operator license. The violation is described in the enclosed Notice and is classified at Severity Level II in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy) (1988).

The NRC recognizes that you have participated in a comprehensive rehabilitation program within PECo for the purpose of better understanding your individual responsibilities under your NRC license and to assure such conduct does not recur. Nonetheless, the activities described in the Notice were engaged in by you for an extended period prior to the shutdowr and were indicative of a complacent and unprofessional attitude by you toward the privileges and responsibilities of your license, contrary to safety, and constituted serious ,

dereliction of duties in carrying out those responsibilities. Further, as a i bh $$o$_h l

, Robert R. Hoopes shift supervisor responsible not only for manipulating controls, but also for directing manipulation of controls by reactor operators, you set a poor example ,

for these individuals and failed to exercise the control and comand responsi- I bilities expected of a person in your position. You are reminded that you hold a license from the United States government which confers upon you the special trust and confidence of the American people in the safe operation of nuclear J facilities and places you in a position where your performance is expected to be above reproach. Consequently, I have determined that additional action should be taken to emphasize your individual accountability to the NRC as a license holder, and as a supervisor of other licensed personnel, as well as your responsibility to remain alert and attentive at all times so as to ensure protection of the public health and safety.

During the NRC deliberations concerning appropriate enforcement action, the NRC considered the entire spectrum of possible enforcement actions, including Letter of Reprimand, Notice of Violation, Civil Penalty, and Orders to Modify, Suspend or Revoke your license. In light of your participation in the rehabil-itatica program and the fact that pervasive and extended management failures contributed significantly to the unacceptable conditions at Peach Bottom, I have determined that an Order against your license is inappropriate. However, in light of your involvement in this conduct and your failure to take corrective actions and after consultation with the Comission, I have decided to issue to ,

you the encloced Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty (

in the amount of $800 to emphasize that you, as a license holder, are individually ,

accountable to the NRC. The violation is classified at Severity Level II in view of your supervisory rank. Although the enforcement policy does not provide .

a schedule for civil penalties against individuals, the penalty is based on the schedule provided for in Table IA for :, mall materials licenses in which the base civil penalty is $800. You should be aware that any recurrence of this behavior could result in revocatior. of your license.

You are re' quired to respond to the enclosed Notice and should follow the instructions specified therein when preparing your response.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter md its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No.96-511.

Sincerely, h __@ , Deputy Executive Director a s M. Tay1 for Region Operations

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty

. Robert R. Hoopes -

3-cc w/ encl:

Corbin McNeill, Executive Vice President,' Nuclear PublicDocumentRoom-(PDR)

LocalPublicDocumentRoom(LPDR)

NRC Resident Inspector Comonwealth of Pennsylvania Smith B. Gephart, Esq.

1

~ "~ = - - e--e-, --w,-w.,.,-, ,__ , , ,, ,_,, _ __,,,_ _ , _, __ __ _

1 DISTRIBUTION: '

bec w/ encl: l' RegionIDocketRoom(w/ concurrences) -

l SECY Congressional Affairs  !

J. Taylor, DEDO W. Russell, RI D. Holody, RI I J. Lieberman, OE l Enforcement Directors, RII-RIIT Enforcement Officers, RIV-Y F. Ingram, PA E. Jordan, AE0D B. Hayes, 01 S. Connelly, OIA F. Miraglia, NRR ,

D. Nussbaumer, 0GPA '

OE/ES File OE/EA File EDO Rdg File DCS L. Chandler, OGC 1

(

1 l

l

.