ML20151V517

Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $1,000.Violation Noted:Control Room Operators Observed Sleeping While on Duty in Control Room & Reading Matl Not Directly Job Related

ML20151V517
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom, 05503223
Issue date:	08/09/1988
From:	Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Blasy R PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20151V523	List: ML20151V517 ML20151V535
References
EA-88-075, EA-88-75, NUDOCS 8808220311
Download: ML20151V517 (4)

Text

_

m i

% UNITED $TATES

{

,y g

5 j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHING TON, D. C. 20555 9

ESIGNATD cRIGINAL Docket No. 55-5223

, Certined ry _ bqf o -

License No. S0P-3498 EA 88-75 09 M E8 Mr. Richard A. Blasy HOME ADDRESS DELETED UNDER 10 CFR 2.790

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY In March 1987, the NRC received information that control room operators at Philadelphia Electric Company's Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station had been observed sleeping while on duty in the control room, reading materials not directly job related, and being otherwise inattentive to the obligations of their licenses. The NRC promptly confirmed this infomation during the initial phase of an investigation of this matter. As a result, the NRC no longer had reasonable assurance that the facility would be operated in a manner to assure that the health and safety of the public would be protected, and therefore, issued an Order to Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) on March 31, 1987 suspending operations of the Peach Bottom reactors, effective imediately.

Subsequently, the NRC found that the inattentiveness described in the Order had occurred over an extended period of time and was pervasive. Other examples of inattentive behavior not known at the time of the Order were also identified such as control room personnel being routinely reclined in a resting position with their heads back and eyes closed for indeteminate periods of time; play-ing hand held computer games ur video games on one of the computer display screens in the control room, and engaging in horseplay. Operators were aware of these conditions ard failed to take action to correct them. As a result of these findings, the NRC conducted an enforcement conference with you on March 25, 1988 for the purpose of discussing your understanding of (1) these inattentiveness issues (2) their safety significance, (3) their causes, and (4) corrective actions taken by both you and the utility. During that conference, you ytcifically admitted to your personal involvement in at least some of this inattentive behavicr. Your actions constituted e violation of your individual senior reactor operator license. The violation is described in the enclosed Notice and is clas;ified at Severity Level II in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2 Appendix C (Enforcement Policy) (1988).

The NRC recognizes that your license has been teminated. Monetheless, the activities described in the Notice were engaged in by you while you were perfoming duties under your license. Your participation in those activities was ongoing for an extended period prior to the shutdown and was indicative of a corrplacent and unprofessional attitude by you toward the privileges and responsibilities of your license, contrary to safety, and constituted serious dareliction of duties in carrying out those responsibilities. Further, in your role as a shift suparintendent, you set a poor example for those individuals under your supervision and failed to exercise the connand and control responsibilities expected of a prson in your position. You should be reminded l

l 8808220311 080809 l l gDR ADOCK 0500g7

__ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . - ~ -_

l  !

j .. ..

i

^ '

i -

Richard A. Blasy -

I

! that you held a license from the United States government which conferred upon j you the special trust and confidence of the American people in the safe operation <

of nuclear facilities and placed you in a position where your performance was

~

. expected to be above reproach. Consequently I have detennined that additional  !

4 action should be taken to emphasize that license holders are not only l accountable to their management, but also are individually accountable to the ,

NRC and have a responsibility to remain alert and attentive at all times to  ;

i ensure protection of the public health and safety.

Leuring the NRC deliberations concerning appropriate enforcement action, the NRC considered the entire spectrum of possible enforcement actions, including

a Letter of Reprimand, Notice of Violation, Civil Penalty, and Orders to i Modify. Suspend or Revoke your license. Since your license is not current at >

!' this time, an order against your license is not appropriate. Nonetheless, in l light of your involvement in this conduct and your failure to take corrective i action concerning subordinates involved in such conduct and after consultatfora

' with the Comission I have decided to issue to you the enclosed Notice of

,. Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $1,000 for  !

i the violation in the enclosed Notice. The violation is classified at Severity

Level !! in view of your past supervisory role. Although the Enforcement Policy c

does not provide a schedule of civil penelty amounts for civil penal' des ssued l

< against individuals, the penalty is based on the schedule provided for in J Table 1A for other msterials licenses. The staff his considered the factors I for increasing and decreesing the base civil penalty and has detemined that a 25 percent increase of the base civil penalty is appropriate in this case to  ;

reflect the added ressonsibility you had as the individual in charge of a shift  !

t on which a prolonged sreakdown of proper shif t o >eration occurred. You are  ;

i required to respond to the enclosed Notice and s sould follow the instructions l

] specified therein knen preparing your response.  ;

1 \

l Although you currently do not hold a license, if you should seek any future NRC i l approval as a licensed individual, the NRC may require that you either (1)  !

, participate in a rehabilitation program equivalent to the "People, Foundation

! for Excellence" course completed by shift supervisors and reactor operators who

) have retained their license, or (2) justify to the NRC why participation tw l

such a program is unnecessary, t

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice " Part 2, j Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures i i will be placed in the NRC Public Doc e nt Room. I

The responses directed by this letter anf the enclosed Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. Pub. L. No.96-511.

Sincerely. l

\ W - .MM 1

! J s M. Taylor puty Executive Director  !

for Regional rations l.

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation and  !

l Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty  !

cc w/ enc 1: (seenextpage) I l

m -em ----wm~,~,--.-,.mm-,. - - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - -

I-4 i..-

. 3 s cc w/encI:-

! Corbin McNeill, Executive Vice Pret 8dent, Nuclear l

PublicDocumentRoom(PDR).(LPDR)

Local Public Document Room NRC Resident Inses, tor Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Smith B. Gephart, Esq.

J t

i i

f i

l i

4 i

i i

i

- ~-

i

. .* j 1

DISTRIBUTION' bec w/ encl:  !

RegionIDocketRoom(w/ concurrences)

SECY t Congressional Affairs i J. Taylor DED0 W. Russell, RI D. Holody, RI J. Lieberman, OE Enforcement Directors, RII-RIII l Enforcement Officers, RIY-V  ;

F. Ingram, PA E. Jordan. 40D B. He S. Coi. JIA F. Mira, ,e, NRR ,

D. Nttssbaumer, 0GPA  !

OE/ES file OE/EA File I EDO Rdg File DCS L. Chandler, OGC f

~~ ,,---...n,,,-. . e s, - - , - - , - -. ., , - - - , , . , ,--

e ,,,, e- ~ s-, - , - - - -- ,+y-- ep--<