ML20151S456
| ML20151S456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1988 |
| From: | Lieberman J NRC OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT (OE) |
| To: | Russell W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151S458 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8808150205 | |
| Download: ML20151S456 (1) | |
Text
.
,i
+
+#om a s a g*'o UNITED STATES
[
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,,.(
I WASHIMToN, D C. 20655 t
/
%,,,,/
@L#sissa MEMORANDUM FOR:
William T. Russell Regional Administrator, RI FROM:
James Lieberman, Director Office of Enforcement
SUBJECT:
RELAXATION Of THE OYSTER CREEK ORDER AND ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES FROM 01 INVESTIGATION OF OYSTfP CPffM SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATION Ve have reviewed your July 14, 1988 proposed response to GPU Nuclear to relax the Neverber 5, IDEf Order.
We concur to the issuonee af the revised letter (Enclosure 1).
I have coordinated the response with Mr. hylor and the DOJ.
In addition we heve reviewed the three draft letters from Regier I concerning enforcerent eerferences/reetings resulting from the Oyster Creek safety lirit violation, and I nave de 'ollrwing corrnents.
OE concurs with the Region's proposal to have a conference with Mr. Geaudreau arid te offer but rot require a conference with GPUN.
Witn respect to Mr. Aller, it seems that the letter we send sheuld make it clear that we have sone concerns with his perfuntarice drid should he in the future seek te cbtain another NRC license those concerns would have to be addressed.
In this regard we have no objection to offerirg to meet with Mr. Aller now or defer such a recting to such a time as he seer.s to apply for another f60 licento.
Thic approach would put him on notice of the NnC staff's concerns but wculd leave the decision or an imediate rueetino to hirn.
The sovrse of action outlined above is the appropriate ccurse of action for a nurber of reasons including:
(1) He is not presently a licensee, (2) He is not, in the strict sense, ireplicated in any violations of regulatory requirerents, (3) Given the circumstances of I and 2 above we do not normally meet individually with utilicensed employee:., (4) The expenditure o' staff resources does not seem warranted given that he tray never reapply for a license, and (5) recognizing this is a unique situation, we are offering Mr. Aller the optinn (f presenting his views now. is a redraft of the letter to Mr. Aller which includes the points !
made above.
This redraft has been reviewed by OGC.
I have also discussed the letter to tne individuals witn CW and they nave no objection to proceeding with the meetings. However, they ask that any meetings be documented by either being transcribed or detailed notes being taken.
They prefer having Of take detailed notes during the ineetings.
If you have any questions or coments, please give me a call, l
88o8150205 800729 PDR ADOCK 05000219
/
G PNU J imes Lieberman, Director
[ J ffice of Enforcement cc:
J. Taylor, DEDRO J. Ovidbe,y, 000 F. fliraglia, NRR
__