|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217H5811999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards 1999 Update to FSAR, for McGuire Nuclear Station.With Instructions,List of Effective Pages for Tables & List of Effective Pages for Figures ML20217G7861999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards MOR for Sept 1999 & Revised MOR for Aug 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Unit 1 & 2 ML20217F3591999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards Info Copy of Cycle 14 COLR for McGuire Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20217F3261999-10-13013 October 1999 Submits Quantity of Tubes Insp from Either Side of SGs A-D & Lists Tubes with Imperfections,Locations & Size.No Tubes Removed from Svc by Plugging.Total of Eleven Tubing Wear Indications Identified at Secondary Side Supports in SGs ML20217F8011999-10-13013 October 1999 Informs That on 990930,NRC Completed mid-cycle PPR of McGuire Nuclear Station.Areas That Warranted More than Core Insp Program Over Next Five Months,Not Identified.Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl ML20217J5091999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Revs to Section 16.15-4.8.1.1.2.g of McGuire Selected Licensee Commitments Manual.Section Has Been Revised to Allow Testing of Portions of DG Fuel Oil Sys Every 10 Yrs ML20217C8351999-10-0505 October 1999 Communicates Correction to Info Provided During 990917 Meeting with Duke Energy & NRC Region Ii.Occupational Radiation Safety Performance Indicator Values Should Have Been Presented as 1 Instead of 0 ML20217C4471999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-369/99-06 & 50-370/99-06 on 990801- 0911.Determined That One Violation Occurred & Being Treated as Non-Cited Violation ML20212J2191999-10-0404 October 1999 Informs That Util 980326 Response to GL 97-06, Degradation of SG Internals Provides Reasonable Assurance That Condition of Steam Generator Internals Are in Compliance with Current Licensing Bases for Facility ML20212J7801999-10-0404 October 1999 Discusses GL 98-01 Issued by NRC on 980511 & DPC Responses for McGuire NPP & 990615.Informs That NRC Reviewed Responses & Concluded That All Requested Info Re Y2K Readiness Provided.Subj GL Considers to Be Closed ML20212M1651999-09-23023 September 1999 Refers to 990917 Meeting at Region II Office Re Licensee Presentation of self-assessment of McGuire Nuclear Station Performance.List of Attendees & Licensee Presentation Handouts,Encl ML20212D1671999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Exemption & SER from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50,App A,General Design Criterion 57 Re Isolation of Main Steam Branch Lines Penetrating Containment.Exemption Related to Licensee Application ML20212B6491999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Encl Announcement Re 990913 Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-9 & NPF-7 Forwarded to C Observer in North Carolina,For Publication ML20212D5321999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Duke Energy Corp Agrees to Restrict Max Fuel Rod Average Burnup to 60,000 Mwd/Mtu,In Order to Support NRC Final Approval & Issuance of Requested Amend ML20212A4131999-09-14014 September 1999 Informs That TR DPC-NE-2009P Submitted in 990817 Affidavit, Marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure, Pursuant to 10CFR2.709(b) & Section 103(b) of Atomic Energy Act of 1954,as Amended ML20216E8791999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station ML20212A0501999-09-10010 September 1999 Informs That Postponing Implementation of New Conditions Improved by RG 1.147,rev 12,acceptable Since Evaluation on Relief Based on Implementing Code Case for Duration of Insp Interval ML20212A2631999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Rev 25 to McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program, IAW 10CFR50.55a. Section 8.0 Contains Summary of Changes & Detailed Description of Changes Associated with Rev 25 ML20212A5191999-09-0808 September 1999 Requests NRC Approval for Relief from Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI,1989 Edition,App VI,VI-2430(c) & 2440(b).Approval of 99-GO-002 Is Requested by 000301 ML20211J3671999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Public Notice of Application for Amend to License NPF-9 Seeking one-time Extension of Surveillance Frequency for TS SR 3.1.4.2 Beyond 25% Extension Allowed by TS SR 3.0.2 ML20211M4451999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Summary of Util Conclusions Re Outstanding Compliance Issue Re Staff Interpretation of TS SR 3.0.1,per Insp Repts 50-369/99-03 & 50-370/99-03,as Discussed with NRC During 990618 Meeting ML20211H1741999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Comments on Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 & McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 Specific Reactor Vessel Info Contained in Rvid.Ltr Dtd 990107,rept ATI-98-012-T005 & Partial marked-up Rept WCAP-14995 Encl ML20211K8831999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-369/99-05 & 50-370/99-05 on 990620-0731.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as NCVs ML20211G5181999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards SE Re second-10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan Request for Relief 98-004 for Plant,Unit 1 ML20211F2971999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Updated Pages for DPC-NE-2009,submitted 980722.Pages Modify Fuel Design & thermal-hydraulic Analysis Sections of DPC-NE-2009. Proprietary Page 2-4 Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20211B1121999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Topical Rept DPC-NE-2012, Dynamic Rod Worth Measurement Using Casmo/Simulate, Describing Results of Six Drwm Benchmark Cycles at Catawba & McGuire & Discusses Qualification to Use Drwm at Catawba & McGuire ML20210V0171999-08-13013 August 1999 Confirms Conversation Between M Cash & M Franovich on 990806 Re Mgt Meeting,Scheduled for 990917 to Present self- Assessment of Plant Performance.Meeting Will Be Held in Atlanta,Ga ML20210S2231999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for June 1999,encl ML20210T4511999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re 981014 Standby Nuclear Svc Water Pond Dam Audit Conducted by FERC ML20210R4311999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Summary Rept of Mods,Minor Mods,Procedure Changes & Other Misc Changes Per 10CFR0.59 ML20210R0031999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Revised TS Bases Pages to NRC for Info & Use. Editorial Changes Were Made to Correct Incorrect UFSAR Ref Number Associated with Certain Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure Isolation Valves ML20210Q3701999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Authorized Representative of Facility Must Submit Ltr as Listed,Thirty Days Before Exam Date in Order to Register Individuals to Take Exam ML20210H7691999-07-21021 July 1999 Submits Summary of 990715 Meeting at Facility Re Presentation of Results of Most Recent Periodic Ppr.List of Meeting Attendees Encl ML20209H1551999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for May 1999 Also Encl ML20210E1931999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-369/99-04 & 50-370/99-04 on 990509-0619.Four Violations of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as Ncv,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy NUREG-1431, Forwards SER Agreeing with Util General Interpretation of TS LCO 3.0.6,but Finds No Technical Basis or Guidance That Snubbers Could Be Treated as Exception to General Interpretation1999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards SER Agreeing with Util General Interpretation of TS LCO 3.0.6,but Finds No Technical Basis or Guidance That Snubbers Could Be Treated as Exception to General Interpretation ML20209G5151999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Amended Pages to Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Repts, for 1997 & 1998 for McGuire Nuclear Station. Portion of Rept Was Inadvertently Omitted Due to Administrative Error,Which Has Been Corrected ML20196J9001999-07-0606 July 1999 Informs That 990520 Submittal of Rept DPC-NE-3004-PA,Rev 1, Mass & Energy Release & Containment Response Methodology, Marked Proprietary Will Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) of AEA of 1954 ML20196J4381999-06-29029 June 1999 Informs That as Result of Staff Review of Util Responses to GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1,NRC Revised Info in Rvid & Releasing Rvid Version 2 ML20196G3721999-06-24024 June 1999 Documents Verbal Info Provided to NRR During Conference Call Re Relief Requests 98-002 & 98-003 ML20196G7461999-06-22022 June 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR54.17(c) That Application for Renewed Operating License Not Be Submitted to NRC Earlier than 20 Yrs Before Expiration of Operating License Currently in Effect ML20195K3601999-06-14014 June 1999 Forwards MORs for May 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 & Revised MORs for Apr 1999.Line 6 Max Dependable Capacity (Gross Mwe) on Operating Data Rept Should Be Revised to 1114 from Jan 1998 to Apr 1999 ML20195D5691999-06-0303 June 1999 Submits Ltr to Facilitate Closing of Inspector Follow Up Item 50-369,370/97-15-05,re Revising Site Drawings in UFSAR Into Summary one-line Flow Diagrams,Per NRC 990327 Telcon ML20195F1851999-06-0202 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-369/99-03 & 50-370/99-03 on 990328- 0508.Two Violations of NRC Requirements Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20195E8771999-06-0202 June 1999 Confirms Telcon with M Cash on 990524 Re Public Meeting for 990715.Purpose of Meeting to Discuss Results of NRC Most Recent PPR ML20207D0521999-05-21021 May 1999 Informs That in Telcon on 990519 Between a Orton & Rf Aiello Arrangements Made for Administration of Initial Written Exam for McGuire Nuclear Station on 990603.Exam Will Be Administered at Catawba Simultaneously with Written Exam ML20196L1791999-05-20020 May 1999 Communicates Util Licensing Position Re Inoperable Snubbers. Licensee Has Determined That Structure of ITS Has Resulted in Certain Confusion Re Treatment of Inoperable Snubbers ML20196L1851999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Version of Rev 1 to TR DPC-NE-3004, Mass & Energy Release & Containment Response Methodology, Consisting of Finer Nodalization of Ice Condenser Region.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20206T4481999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to Topical Rept DPC-NE-3002-A, UFSAR Chapter 15 Sys Transient Analysis Methodology, IAW Guidance Contained in NUREG-0390 ML20206R0791999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 & Revised Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217H5811999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards 1999 Update to FSAR, for McGuire Nuclear Station.With Instructions,List of Effective Pages for Tables & List of Effective Pages for Figures ML20217F3261999-10-13013 October 1999 Submits Quantity of Tubes Insp from Either Side of SGs A-D & Lists Tubes with Imperfections,Locations & Size.No Tubes Removed from Svc by Plugging.Total of Eleven Tubing Wear Indications Identified at Secondary Side Supports in SGs ML20217F3591999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards Info Copy of Cycle 14 COLR for McGuire Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20217G7861999-10-13013 October 1999 Forwards MOR for Sept 1999 & Revised MOR for Aug 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Unit 1 & 2 ML20217J5091999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Revs to Section 16.15-4.8.1.1.2.g of McGuire Selected Licensee Commitments Manual.Section Has Been Revised to Allow Testing of Portions of DG Fuel Oil Sys Every 10 Yrs ML20217C8351999-10-0505 October 1999 Communicates Correction to Info Provided During 990917 Meeting with Duke Energy & NRC Region Ii.Occupational Radiation Safety Performance Indicator Values Should Have Been Presented as 1 Instead of 0 ML20212D5321999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Duke Energy Corp Agrees to Restrict Max Fuel Rod Average Burnup to 60,000 Mwd/Mtu,In Order to Support NRC Final Approval & Issuance of Requested Amend ML20216E8791999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station ML20212A2631999-09-0909 September 1999 Forwards Rev 25 to McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program, IAW 10CFR50.55a. Section 8.0 Contains Summary of Changes & Detailed Description of Changes Associated with Rev 25 ML20212A5191999-09-0808 September 1999 Requests NRC Approval for Relief from Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI,1989 Edition,App VI,VI-2430(c) & 2440(b).Approval of 99-GO-002 Is Requested by 000301 ML20211M4451999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Summary of Util Conclusions Re Outstanding Compliance Issue Re Staff Interpretation of TS SR 3.0.1,per Insp Repts 50-369/99-03 & 50-370/99-03,as Discussed with NRC During 990618 Meeting ML20211H1741999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Comments on Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 & McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 Specific Reactor Vessel Info Contained in Rvid.Ltr Dtd 990107,rept ATI-98-012-T005 & Partial marked-up Rept WCAP-14995 Encl ML20211F2971999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Updated Pages for DPC-NE-2009,submitted 980722.Pages Modify Fuel Design & thermal-hydraulic Analysis Sections of DPC-NE-2009. Proprietary Page 2-4 Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20211B1121999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Topical Rept DPC-NE-2012, Dynamic Rod Worth Measurement Using Casmo/Simulate, Describing Results of Six Drwm Benchmark Cycles at Catawba & McGuire & Discusses Qualification to Use Drwm at Catawba & McGuire ML20210S2231999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for June 1999,encl ML20210T4511999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re 981014 Standby Nuclear Svc Water Pond Dam Audit Conducted by FERC ML20210R0031999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Revised TS Bases Pages to NRC for Info & Use. Editorial Changes Were Made to Correct Incorrect UFSAR Ref Number Associated with Certain Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure Isolation Valves ML20210R4311999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Summary Rept of Mods,Minor Mods,Procedure Changes & Other Misc Changes Per 10CFR0.59 ML20209H1551999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for May 1999 Also Encl ML20209G5151999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Amended Pages to Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Repts, for 1997 & 1998 for McGuire Nuclear Station. Portion of Rept Was Inadvertently Omitted Due to Administrative Error,Which Has Been Corrected ML20196G3721999-06-24024 June 1999 Documents Verbal Info Provided to NRR During Conference Call Re Relief Requests 98-002 & 98-003 ML20196G7461999-06-22022 June 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR54.17(c) That Application for Renewed Operating License Not Be Submitted to NRC Earlier than 20 Yrs Before Expiration of Operating License Currently in Effect ML20195K3601999-06-14014 June 1999 Forwards MORs for May 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 & Revised MORs for Apr 1999.Line 6 Max Dependable Capacity (Gross Mwe) on Operating Data Rept Should Be Revised to 1114 from Jan 1998 to Apr 1999 ML20195D5691999-06-0303 June 1999 Submits Ltr to Facilitate Closing of Inspector Follow Up Item 50-369,370/97-15-05,re Revising Site Drawings in UFSAR Into Summary one-line Flow Diagrams,Per NRC 990327 Telcon ML20196L1791999-05-20020 May 1999 Communicates Util Licensing Position Re Inoperable Snubbers. Licensee Has Determined That Structure of ITS Has Resulted in Certain Confusion Re Treatment of Inoperable Snubbers ML20196L1851999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Version of Rev 1 to TR DPC-NE-3004, Mass & Energy Release & Containment Response Methodology, Consisting of Finer Nodalization of Ice Condenser Region.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20206R0791999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 & Revised Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 ML20206T4481999-05-13013 May 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to Topical Rept DPC-NE-3002-A, UFSAR Chapter 15 Sys Transient Analysis Methodology, IAW Guidance Contained in NUREG-0390 ML20206S9151999-05-11011 May 1999 Forwards Rev 29 to McGuire Nuclear Station Selected Licensee Commitments. Section 16.11-16.2 Has Been Revised to Apply Guidance of NUREG-0133 for Performing Gaseous Effluent Dose Pathway Calculations ML20206K1341999-05-0303 May 1999 Forwards 1999 Interim UFSAR for McGuire Nuclear Station. UFSAR Update Includes Items Relocated During Improved Tech Specs Implementation.Next Regular UFSAR Update as Required 10CFR50.71(e) Is Due in Oct 1999 ML20206F3321999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998 for McGuire Nuclear Station. Listed Attachments Are Contents of Rept.Revised ODCM Was Submitted to NRC on 990203 ML20206E4101999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Four Copies of Rev 9 Todpc Nuclear Security & Contingency Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML20206B4791999-04-20020 April 1999 Requests Exemption from GDC 57 Re Reactor Containment - Closed Sys Isolation Valves,As Described in 10CFR,App a for Containment Penetrations M393 & M261.Detailed Technical Evaluation & Justification for Exemption Request,Encl ML20205S9731999-04-19019 April 1999 Submits Info Re Quantity of SG Tubes Inspected,Tube Indications of Imperfections & Tubes Removed from Svc by Plugging,Per TS 5.6.8,part B 05000369/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-01(S)-00 Re Contract Employee Submittal of False Info Resulting in Gaining Unescorted Access.No Licensee Planned Corrective Actions or Other Regulatory Commitments Were Identified as Result of Incidence1999-04-16016 April 1999 Forwards LER 99-01(S)-00 Re Contract Employee Submittal of False Info Resulting in Gaining Unescorted Access.No Licensee Planned Corrective Actions or Other Regulatory Commitments Were Identified as Result of Incidence ML20205P8891999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for Feb 1999 Encl ML20206K3561999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Revised McGuire Nuclear Station Selected Licensee Commitments (SLC) Manual. Significant Changes Are Marked by Vertical Bars on Right Margin ML20205K5131999-04-0707 April 1999 Forwards Complete Response to NRC 981209 & 990105 RAIs on Question 11 Re LARs for McGuire & Catawba Nuclear Stations. Addl Info Received from W & Contained in Encl W ML20205B6011999-03-23023 March 1999 Requests That NRC Place Technical Interface Agreement 97-02 Re URI 96-11-03,raising Operability & Design Criteria Conformance Issues Re Hydraulic Snubbers Installed at Plant & NRR Response on Dockets to Provide Record of Issue ML20205C4611999-03-23023 March 1999 Submits Correction to Violation Against 10CFR50 App B, Criterion VII, Control of Purchased Matl,Equipment & Svcs, Issued to McGuire Nuclear Station on 980807 ML20205B6161999-03-23023 March 1999 Provides Addl Info & Correction to Typo in Re License Bases Record Change Re License Amend Submittals ,approved as FOL NPF-9 & NPF-17,amends 184 & 166, respectively.Marked-up TS Pages,Encl ML20204J0051999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Response to 990127 & 28 RAIs Re GL 96-05 for Catawba & McGuire Nuclear Stations ML20204E1791999-03-18018 March 1999 Reflects 990318 Telcon Re License Bases Record Change for License Amend Submittals ,approved as Amends 184 & 166,respectively for Licenses NPF-9 & NPF-17.TS Pages Encl ML20204C8821999-03-15015 March 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2.Revised Rept for Jan 1999 Encl ML20207C2071999-02-25025 February 1999 Informs of Revised Expected Submittal Date of Proposed License Amend Presented at 990127 Meeting Re Soluble Boron & Boraflex.Util Plans to Submit Proposed License Amend in First Quarter of 1999 ML20207C7691999-02-22022 February 1999 Forwards Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Rept for 1998. Rept Provides Tabulation of Number of Station,Utility & Other Personnel Receiving Exposure Greater than 100mRem/yr Followed by Total Dose for Each Respective Worker ML20207C6851999-02-22022 February 1999 Forwards Revised TS Bases Pages,Reflecting Removal of SI Signal on Low Steamline Pressure on Page B 3.3.2-16 & Adding Clarification for Increasing Hydrogen Recombiner Power During Testing on Page B 3.6.7-4 ML20206S3341999-01-28028 January 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC 981209 & 990105 RAIs Re Util Lars,Permitting Use of W Fuel at McGuire & Catawba Stations.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20199E0081999-01-12012 January 1999 Forwards MOR for Dec 1998 & Revised MOR for Nov 1998 for McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20199C9861999-01-0707 January 1999 Forwards Annual Lake Norman Environ Summary Rept for 1997,as Required by NPDES Permit NC0024392,including Detailed Results & Data Comparable to That of Previous Years.With Corrected Pages 3 & 19 to 1994-95 Lake Norman Creel Rept 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20059L0101990-09-19019 September 1990 Provides Addl Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-11 & 50-370/90-11,per .Corrective Action:Operations & Compliance Mgt Further Examined Event & Concluded That Trains Vc/Yc Inoperable Per Special Order ML20059L0091990-09-18018 September 1990 Informs of Delay in Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-14 & 50-370/90-14.Delay Due to Ongoing Review ML20059L5491990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Proprietary Response to Question Re Scope of Review of Topical Rept, Safety Analysis Physics Parameter & Multidimensional Reactor Transients Methodology, Per & 900723 Meeting.Response Withheld ML20059J7121990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1990 for McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 & Monthly Operating Status Rept for Jul 1990 ML20059L5521990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Response to 18 Questions Re Topical Rept DPC-NE-2004,per NRC 900802 Request for Addl Info.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20065D4671990-09-11011 September 1990 Informs of Delay in Response to Violation Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-11 & 50-370/90-11,per Commitment in ML20064A8031990-09-10010 September 1990 Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-13 & 50-370/90-13.Corrective Actions:Procedures Dealing W/Fuel Handling Will Be Enhanced by Adding Sign Off to Sections Which Ref Fuel Handling in Tech Specs ML20059G3011990-09-0404 September 1990 Forwards Response to NRC 900327 Request for Addl Info Re BAW-10174, Mark-BW Reload LOCA Analysis for Catawba & Mcguire ML20064A5741990-09-0404 September 1990 Discusses Re Info to Support Util Position Relative to Resolving Issue of Main Steam Line Breaks Inside Ice Condenser Containments & Requests That Info Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20064A5671990-09-0101 September 1990 Advises That Corrective Actions Re Violation of Insp Rept 50-369/89-01 & 50-370/89-01 Will Be Completed by 910101 ML20059D3461990-08-30030 August 1990 Forwards Semiannual Effluent Release Rept for First Half of CY90 & Revs to Process Control Program ML20059G9141990-08-22022 August 1990 Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Change 0 to RP/O/A/5700/01,Change 0 to RP/O/A/5700/02 & Change 0 to RP/O/A/5700/03 ML20059D1901990-08-22022 August 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-11 & 50-370/90-11.Corrective Actions:Valves VC-1,VC-2,VC-3,VC-4, VC-9,VC-10,VC-11 & VC-12 Reopened Upon Discovery of VC-1 - VC-4 Being Closed & Procedure IP/0/13/3006/09 Revised ML16259A2391990-08-22022 August 1990 Forwards Public Version of Rev 27 to Company Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedure CMIP-2, News Group Plan. W/ Dh Grimsley 900906 Release Memo ML20059C1201990-08-20020 August 1990 Forwards Rept Summarizing Util Findings Re Three False Negative Blind Performance Urine Drug Screens Which Occurred During Jan & Feb 1990.Recommends That NRC Consider Generic Communication to Clearly State Reporting Requirement ML20059B4451990-08-20020 August 1990 Requests That NRC Approval of Original Relief Request 89-02 Be Extended to Include Changes to Mods MG-22233 & MG-22243 as Described.Hydrostatic Testing Impractical Due to Inadequacy of Test Boundaries ML20059C1591990-08-17017 August 1990 Suppls by Providing Addl Info to Support Util Position Re Anl Confirmatory Analysis of Main Steamline Breaks in Ice Condenser Plants.Encl Withheld ML20063Q0901990-08-15015 August 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for Jul 1990 for McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 & Revised Rept for June 1990 ML20063Q2671990-08-14014 August 1990 Forwards Public Version of Revised Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 36 to CMIP-1,Rev 32 to CMIP-4,Rev 36 to CMIP-5,Rev 41 to CMIP-6,Rev 40 to CMIP-7,Rev 27 to CMIP-8 & Rev 35 to CMIP-9.W/DH Grimsley 900821 Release Memo ML20058N0181990-08-0808 August 1990 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re BAW-10174, Mark-BW Reload LOCA Analysis for Catawba & Mcguire ML20063Q0181990-08-0707 August 1990 Confirms That Planned Corrective Actions Listed in Paragraph 3 of Insp Repts 50-369/90-10 & 50-370/90-10,appropriately Described ML20056A9541990-08-0101 August 1990 Provides Final Response to NUREG-0737,Item II.D.1, Performance Testing of Safety Relief Valves. Util Will Change Seal Configuration for Existing Valves to Seal on Steam Medium & Install Continuous Drain for Loop Piping ML20058L4061990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards Rev 0 to Inservice Insp Rept Unit 1 McGuire 1990 Refueling Outage 6 ML20058L1811990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards Safety Evaluation of Large Break LOCA Event Reanalysis Per 10CFR50.46 Re Peak Clad Temp Increases ML20059K0291990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards Comments on Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Written Exams Administered on 900730 ML20056A1571990-07-23023 July 1990 Forwards Public Version of Change 0 to RP/0/A/5700/10 & Rev 25 to Section 18.2 of Radiation Protection Manual.W/ Dh Grimsley 900730 Release Memo NLS9000259, Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-09 & 50-370/90-09.Corrective actions:in-house Training Will Be Provided on Correct Method for Determining Proper Response to Problem Investigation Processes1990-07-16016 July 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-09 & 50-370/90-09.Corrective actions:in-house Training Will Be Provided on Correct Method for Determining Proper Response to Problem Investigation Processes ML20055F7721990-07-13013 July 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts June 1990 for McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 & Status Rept for May 1990 ML20044B0561990-07-0303 July 1990 Forwards Public Version of Epips,Consisting of RP/0/A/5700/02 & RP/0/A/5700/03 & RP/0/A/5700/04.W/ Dh Grimsley 900716 Release Memo ML20044A7941990-06-19019 June 1990 Forwards Public Version of Epips,Including HP/0/B/1009/06, HP/0/B/1009/10 & HP/0/B/1009/20 ML20043H5541990-06-18018 June 1990 Forwards Supplemental Info to Tech Spec Rev Request Re Auxiliary Bldg Filtered Ventilation Sys ML20043G1531990-06-15015 June 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for May 1990 & Corrected Unit Shutdowns & Power Reductions for Apr 1990 ML20043G1741990-06-0707 June 1990 Responds to Request for Addl Info Re BAW-10174, Mark-BW Reload LOCA Analysis for Catawba & Mcguire. Correct RCS Operating Pressure Would Be 2,250 Psia as Identified in Table 3-1 ML20043G3451990-06-0707 June 1990 Forwards Proprietary Response to Request for Addl Info Re Topical Rept BAW-10174, Mark-BW Reload Safety Analysis for Catawba & Mcguire. Response Withheld ML20043G7171990-06-0606 June 1990 Forwards Population Dose Analysis Summary for Plant Liquid Release Pathways Based on 1986 Release Estimates ML20043G6321990-06-0505 June 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-01 & 50-370/90-01.Corrective Actions:Memo Issued Reemphasizing Importance of Frisking & Outlining Frisking Requirement & Personnel Counseled Re Completing Required Documentation ML20043G6281990-06-0404 June 1990 Advises That Corrective Actions Re Departmental Interface Issues to Resolve & Train on Revised Directive Will Be Completed by 900901,per Insp Repts 50-369/89-01 & 50-370/89-01 ML20043F4761990-05-30030 May 1990 Forwards Public Version of Revised Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedures,Consisting of Rev 20 to CMIP-13 & Deletion of CMIP-15 & CMIP-17.W/900612 Release Memo ML20043B5691990-05-23023 May 1990 Advises That Responses to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-01 & 50-370/90-01 Will Be Delayed Until 900601 ML20043C0781990-05-22022 May 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/90-04 & 50-370/90-04.Corrective Actions:Correct Procedure Adherence Reemphasized to Job Supervisor & Engineering Group Involved in Authorization for Torque Change ML20043B9351990-05-16016 May 1990 Forwards Public Version of Epips,Including HP/1/B/1009/15 & HP/2/B/1009/15.W/DH Grimsley 900529 Release Memo ML20043A1041990-05-15015 May 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1990 & Corrected Mar 1990 for McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 ML20042G8221990-05-10010 May 1990 Forwards Addl Info Re Events Leading to 900509 Emergency Tech Spec (TS) Request Re TS 4.6.1.8,per Ds Hood 900510 Telcon & Requests That Changes Also Be Made to Unit 2 Ts. Proposed TS Encl ML20043A8621990-05-10010 May 1990 Forwards Info for Facility 1990 Refueling Outage Re Steam Generator F* Tubes & Tubes Removed from Svc or Repaired ML16152A9621990-05-0909 May 1990 Forwards Public Version of Revised Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 35 to CMIP-1,Rev 26 to CMIP-2,Rev 31 to CMIP-4,Rev 35 to CMIP-5,Rev 40 to CMIP-6,Rev 39 to CMIP-7 & Rev 26 to CMIP-8.W/DH Grimsley 900517 Release Memo ML20042G8331990-05-0808 May 1990 Forwards Info for Facility Tube Rupture Outage Re Steam Generator Inservice Insp,Per Tech Spec 4.4.5.5 & 6.9.2 ML16152A9531990-05-0202 May 1990 Forwards Proprietary DPC-NE-2000P-A & Nonproprietary DPC-NE-2000-A, DCHF-1 Correlation for Predicting Heat Flux in Mixing Vane Grid Fuel Assemblies. Proprietary Rept Withheld ML20042F2611990-04-30030 April 1990 Forwards Technical Evaluation That Concludes Fireproofing of Supports for safety-related HVAC Ducts Not Required & Amends Fire Protection Commitment Re HVAC Sys Support Fireproofing ML20042F8331990-04-26026 April 1990 Forwards Public Version of Revised Epips,Including Change 0 to RP/0/A/5700/01,RP/0/A/5700/02 & RP/0/A/5700/03 ML20042E0631990-04-13013 April 1990 Forwards Monthly Operating Repts for McGuire Nuclear Station for Mar 1990 & Feb 1990 Rept Re Personnel Exposure 1990-09-04
[Table view] |
Text
f
! ENCLSOURE 3 l
- o r 2 Duke Mgr Cmany (704) 815 4000
%fcCuire NuclearStation P.O Ba 48S Cornelia<, NC 28031-0488 DUKEPOWER April 21, 1988 Mr. Ken Brockman Operator Licensing Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Marietta Street N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia
Subject:
McGuire Nuclear Station Review of Written License Examinations
Dear Sir:
Attached are our specific comments on the Reactor Operator and Senior Reactor Operator written examinations administered April 18, 1988 at McGuire Nuclear Station.
In addition, as a general comment, several questions depended too heavily on rote memorization of reference material e.g. question 4.02 which referred to a table in a tech spec interpretation; question 4.09 which referred to fuel maneuvering limit tables in the data book; and question 4.15 which referred to reactor site boundary criteria in 10CFR100.
Very truly yours, j l
l8 p 2 .A SOnstff T.L. McConnell Manager McGuire Nuclear Station TLM/wms i
cc: R.B. Travis L.E. Weaver l D.A. Baxter
! D.M. McGinnis Plant File 8808040252 880721 PDR V
ADOCK 05000369' PNU l
O 0
-e t REACTOR OPERATOR EXAM COMMENTS Page 1 QUESTION 1.06 Concern:
The question requires the RO to determine the net result between two off setting effects; faster dilution of NCS at high boron concentration versus higher differential boron worth at lower boron concentrations; without the use of differential boron worth curve or dilution rate tables which include 1200 ppm. -
Recommendation:
Accept answer C and B as correct. Or at least partial credit for C since it demonstrates knowledge on the part of the operator.
Reference / Reason:
During operation in the control room, the operators have these curves available to them for reference and are not required to memorize them. Selecting item C or B indicates sufficient knowledge of effects.
l 1
1 l
l i
i 1
l
i *
. i QUESTION 1.08 Page 2 I
Concern:
This question involves two effects on axial flux distribution:
- 1) Rod position - inserting Rods drives AFD more negative
- 2) Power level - Reducing power shifts AFD toward the ;
positive l Answer C could also be correct since AFD being more negative )
than the target value of -3.0 implies that the axial power distribution has shifted more negative than the full power axial distribution. j J
Recommendation:
Allow credit for C or D. Or at least partial credit if item C s selected since it demonstrates knowledge on the part of the operator.
1 Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-CTH-CP pg 54, 55 and pg 35-36 I
I
-QUESTION 1.15C Page 3 Concern:
McGuire Unit #1 and #2 differential boron worth for-EOL and EOL are opposite from each other i.e. Unit 2 differential boron worth is more negative at BOL while Unit 1 is more negative at EOL for the same boron concantration. .This would result in an answer of higher or lower depending on what the operator assumed.
Recommendation:
Accept higher or lower Reference / Reason:
McGuire Data Book Unit #1 OP/1/A/6100/22 Enc 1 4.3 Curve 6.2 McGuire Data Book Unit #2 OP/2/A/6100/22 Enci 4.3 Curve 6.2 l
l l
1
^
l l
. .. ~. . . .. --. .. . . .
._. = - - .. _,_._. .
1 a -. .
QUESTION 1.16C Page 4 Concern: .
Answer key is wrong the magnitude of the moderator temp.
coeff, will increase l
Recommendation:
Change answer. key to increase Reference / Reason:
l OP-MC-RT-RCO pg 22-23 l l
i
)
i i
, . . . _ - , .-..._-.,_.--..._.......~_m._,,,- ,.-_,,,___...--_,,.,,,,,,m.... . , . ,. ., m_.m.,v,, ,,,_,----,.x
, . . . . . .,-.. ..y,~
= ,
QUESTION 1.17a Page 5 Concern:
When calculating SDM at Power, Xenon is not included per OP/0/A/6100/06 Enci 5.4 Xenon does not effect long term SDM but it does effect the instantaneous SDM.
Recommendation:
Allow credit for remains the same or increase. Or at least partial credit for remains the same-Reference / Reason:
OP/1/A/6100/06 Enci 5.4 l
l l
i i- =
QUESTION 1.21 Page 6 Concern:
The Tech. Spec. "word" definition for FH and FQ(z) should also be acceptable.
Recommendation:
For F H - Answer the answer key is fully acceptable, but the following should also be allowed.
F H - The ratio of the integral of linear power along the Rod with the highest integrated pcwer to the average Rod Power.
For FQ(z) - Answer key is fully acceptable, but the following should also be allowed.
FQ(z) - The maximum local heat flux on the surface of a fuel Rod at core elevation Z divided by the average fuel Rod Heat Flux.
Reference / Reason:
Tech. Specs. Bases 3/4.2 page B 3/4 2-1 i
l
, . l QUESTION 1.21C Page 7 l
l (1) Concern.
Point value for answer assigns 1/2 total point value for putting particular core height. I i
l (1) Recommendation:
1 Point value be assigned as (.8) for limit maximum Heat Flux l and (.2) for at particular Core Height. l (1) Reference / Reason: j Weight point value according to importance.
i
)
(2) Concern: i I
Question may be answered in terms of limiting core damage following a LOCA. ;
i (2) Recommendation: J Answer key is acceptable but would also like to include the following as acceptable FQ(z) is used to help limit peak local power density and to help ensure minimuni DNBR is not l exceeded so that Peak Clad temperature will not exceed 2200 F l (ECCS acceptance criteria) following LOCA. )1 l
(2) Reference / Reason: )
i Tech. Spec. Bases 3/4.2.2 and 3/4.2.3 pg B 3/4 2-2a. j J
s l
nw i
4 4 QUESTION 1.22a Page 8 9~
concern:
Opera (Jrs.may not put all three Pump Head Curves on same Graph. The point break down in the answer key gives .2 for "correct placement". If the correct placement means the telationship between the ND, NT, and NV Pump Curves on the smne Graph, some operators may be penalized unnecessarily.
The question doesn't clearly emphasize that all three Pump Head Curves should go on the same Graph so the relationship betwat" them can be shown.
Recommendation:
, ~rators should not be penalized if they put the Head Curves on separate Grap.9 such that the relationships are not shown.
Reference /Rssson:
When reviewing question it was not apparent that all three curves needed to gc on one Graph until we looked at the answer key.
c t
9.
w Y
F
,- , , , . ~ . - - -
QUESTION 2.03 Page 9 Concern:
At McGuire, The Plasma Display for RVLIS for the given condition would have invalid indicated with no values shown.
Therefore the operator would not see 70% and 106% as described in the question.
Recommendation:
The question has too many technically incorrect conditions / assumptions to be salvaged. Throw out question If question is not thrown out accept C as an alternate answer since it is partially correct just as answer A is partially correct i.e. for Pump's running with UR RVLIS failed it would indicate pegged high which would be 120% not 106%, also for Pump's running UR RVLIS normal indication is pegged low at 70% not 106%.
Reference / Reason:
The Lesson Plan Referenced in the answer key reflects the indications which would be seen on RVLIS vhen the read out was meter indication. The McGuire Plant no longer has meter indication. The indication now is computerized plasma display. These displays will only indicate P when the instrument is valid i.e. Pumps on or off.
i l
a ,
QUESTION 2.09 Page 10 icncern:
Answer key item "e" states Low Stator Water Cooling Flow whicn is correct. However, the flow is determined by 4P and the setpoint for low flow is a aP.
Recommendation:
Inaddition to Low Stator Water Cooling Flow, Low Stator Water AP should also be fully acceptable.
Reference / Reason:
Drawing MC-IC-EHC 13 I
l i
l I
i 1
I i
I l
.- , 1 q
QUESTION 2.10 Page 11 ;
Concern:
Inaddition to the items listed in the answer. key, ND58 and NS43 must also be closed.
Recommendation:
Add ND58 closed and NS43 closed as possible interlocks which could be listed to answer key.
Reference / Reason:-
Drawing MC-SYS-NI-7 i
t f
, , - . . ,.,- --.-.-. - ,.,,-- .-, . - , . -.~...-----.--..,..,.---,.n,,--- , - - . , , , - - - , , - - ~ . , , . , - - .
QUESTION 2.11C Page 12 Concern:
Valve nomenclature in question is incorrect. ND-43 should be NS 43. Valve ND-38 should be NS 38. The name "ND Aux Spray Valves is Correct." Some Operators may have caught this and assumed it was a "Trick" question. Inaddiclon, ND to Aux Spray would only be available if ND was on the containment Sump since NS 38 and NS 43 require the Sump Valve to be open before they can be opened.
Recommendation:
Inadditon to accepting true; false should be accepted if it is stated that valves are NS 43 and 38 and not ND 43 and 38 or if it is stated that the statement is not always true since ND to Aux Spray is not.always available since it must be aligned to the containment Sump in order to open NS 43 and 38.
1 Since the question only required a true or false, many operators may not qualify their answer. If a large number of operators miss this question, it should be re-evaluated as to whether it should be thrown out.
Reference / Reason: l Drawings MC-SYS-ND-1 and MC-SYS-NI-7 I
l l
l I
I e- %
QUESTION 2.16a Page 13 Concern:
i To answer four(4) modes of operation of this system the operator must include "train A".and "train B". The two basic modes of operation of this system are "Series" and "Parallel" and train related modes of operation.are normally not referred to as such.
Recommendation:
Change question point values to place more weight on the "Series" and "Paralled" alignments and less importance on the train relationship. Request a change to reflect "Sericsd (0.4) "Parallel" (0.4) and the remaining (.2) pts applied to the train relationship.
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-PSS-V6 Lesson Plan; (pg 8; 1-3, A, 3.)
w -
. 4
- QUESTION 2.17a Page 14 Concern:
NC Pump Standpipe is also a correct answer and is not reflected 4'.1 the answer key.
Recommendation:
Include NC Pump Standpipofas correct answer.
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-FH-FW Lesson, drawing FW-1 and OP-MC-CM-NCP Lesson, drawing NCP-5.
5 s
i a
1 1
4
i I
a .
QUESTION 2.18b' Page 15 l
i concern:
Answer key reflects "less than or equal to" is worth (.25)
' and "27 degrees" is worth (.25). Question asks for maximura temperature and "27 degrees F" is the maximum temperature.
i Recommendation:
Allow full credit for both "less than or equal to 27 degrees F" and "27 degrees F".
Reference / Reason:
"27 degrees F" fully answers question asked.
i t
i 4
4
, m_ - .- . , , , , . _ . . - , , , . - - , - - . . , , , - , _ _ , , , , - - - ~ +_ ,-
~ . _ _ __
i
.~-
QUESTION 2.20 Page 16 Concern:
Question asks why "A" RN Pump instead of "B" RN Pump supplies containment ventilation units. It does not ask why RN supplies these units during a blackout situation. The answer key requires that_the operator state that the RV Pumps have lost power (.S pts).
Recommendation:
No requirement in answer key for student to state that the RV Pumps have no power. Full credit given for "greater NPSH" or "Cooler Water Supply".
Reference / Reason:
Answer key requires more than question asks.
1 1
QUESTION 2.21a Page 17 l
Concern:
Answer states one(1) throttle valve at the discharge of the <
pump. There are four(4) throttle valves and they are l located in the four discharge lines into the loops.
Recommendation:
Accept "throttle valves are used to limit total flow".
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-ECC-NI Lesson, pg. 9, d and OP-MC-ECC-NI drawing NI-1.
t I
l
e QUESTION 3.08b- Page 18 Concern:
Answer key implies not only the parameters that can be monitored but also seems to require the range of that parameter (such as: NC Hot Leg Wide Range Pressure). The question only asks for parameters monitored.
Recommendation:
Accept shorter answers for full credit such as: NC Temperature, S/G level; NC Pressure.
Reference /Roason:
Answer key reflects more required information than the question asks.
I 4
I l
l 1
i
QUESTION 3.09b Page 19 Concern:
"D/G Emergency Start Relay" may be used as well as "D/G Automatic Start Relay".
Recommendation:
Allow full credit for either "D/G Automatic Start Relay" or "D/G Automatic Start Relay".
Reference / Reason:
Common Plant Terminology 1
l i
I l
l l
l l
1 t
, -e - , , , - - . y.- - - - , ,,-,- - - + - -.w-a . , - -- - - . < --
s . l QUESTION 3.11 Page 20 I l
l Concern:
Part a) Operators have no ETQS task related with the operation of the Incore Instrument Panel.
Operation of this panel is normally conducted by :
plant performance personnel. Due to this the l answer key seems to require too much detail in the answer required for full credit. Also, the point j value is higher than is reasonable for the '
question.
Part b) Answer states "Honeywell Indicator". Honeywell is the vendor name and should not be part of required answer. Also, answer does not reflect the possible answers: Inadequate Core Cooling Monitor (ICCM) display or SSF which also have temperature displays of the Incore Temperatures, and are separate from the OAC.
Recommendation:
Part a) Allow less detail in answer for full credit example:
- 1) Calibrate - allows calibration of detectors
- 2) Emergency - back-up path
- 3) Common Group - back-up to calibration path
- 4) Storage - stores detectors Reduce overall point value of question Part b) Allow full credit for either c( the following answers:
- 1) Temp. Indicator on panel i
- 2) ICCM display Reference / Reason: l
\
- 1) No ETCS related task on this system l
- 2) Recently installed Inadequate Core Cooling Monitor System provides readouts on Incore Temperatures. This new monitor has not been incorporated into existing 4 lesson plan to date. l
- 3) OP-MC-CP-AD Test portion of lesson page 40, 1.5, A. l l
1
)
)
QUESTION 3.12d Page 21 Concern:
Answer key refers to P8 as > 49%. Due to instrumentation accuracy and allowable tolerance in Tech. Specs. requiring this specific number maybe overly restrictive.
Recommendation:
Accept either 48% or 49% for P8 setpoint Reference / Reason:
Tech. Specs. table 2.2-1 (Rx Trip INST and Trip STPT)
OP-MC-IC-IPE 1
I 1
i 1
l 1
1 o ,
QUESTION 3.14a Page 22 )
i 1
Concern: i i
The question is not clear about whether it wants the l immediate eftects of the S/G level channels failing or if a !
Reactor Trip would occur some time later as a result of the I failure. l I
our S/G level control circuits controls off of S/G level channel 1 normally. If this channel fails .aw the control I circuit will try to increase that S/G level back to program level. However with the channel failed level will continue :
to increase until P14 (82% LVL) is reached. P14 will cause l the Turbine to Trip which in turn will cause the Reactor to l Trip. I l
1 Recommendation: l In additio.1 to the answer key, if the operator says yes the l Reactor Will trip because the failed channel 1 would cause A I S/G to feed up to P14 which will trip the Turbine which trips the Reactor, this should also be acceptable.
Reference / Reason:
Simulator / Plant Response to failed channel 4
1 1
QUESTION 3.14b Page 23 '
Concern:
Answer key says OT DELTA P. This is obviously a typo.
Recommendation:
Change key to say OT DELTA T :
Reference / Reason:
Typo i
t 1
?
I j
l
} .
i I
$ I
}
l 1
4 l
i ,
i v-,, -- -- . , --r, e,, - . . .-, - - - --- , - - . - , - ,c-,,,,,, , ,m .,,., w.7- , , . ,,n,,.,w, p, , . , , , .-,,,. -m,,,,-3,7-- -,--,-r ,.,yv.7,,,--,,wr,-
QUESTION 3.14c Page 24 Concern:
- 1) Answer key says Reactor will trip on OPDELTA T
- 2) OP DELTA T does not receive an input from Tave or Pressurizer Pressure.
- 3) The correct answer should be OT DELTA.T which does receive input from the failed indications.
Recommendations:
Change OP DELTA T to OT DELTA T on answer key Reference / Reason:
Tech. Spec. table 2.2-1 pg 2-8 thru 2-11
)
l I
I
l
QUESTION 3.15a Page 25 l l
.l Concern:
Operators may include in their answer that Pzr level would continue to increase until the Reactor Trip occurs at 92%
level.
Recommendation:
Operators should not be counted off if they state Rx trip occurs when Pzr level reaches 92%.
Reference / Reason:
See drawing MC-IC-ILE-3 F
L l
1 a
- e--- .e- -
.n - ,- ey... --,y, --,,-.1 , r , -e. ,- -
--:-m---- y -t. --wr--e-w- ,, -y .s -.
i l
QUESTION 3.17 Page 26 l
Concern:
- 1) Answer key has too narrow of a band for %FP and %Pzr Lvl. l
- 2) Tc ccn be between 557 to 558 from 0% to 100% FP.
Tava can be 588 or 588.2 depending on reference document.
- 3) Factoring the above variations into the calculation, answers between 72% to 75% can be obtained.
- 4) Also using above variations, Pzr level calculations range between 51% to 53%.
Recommendation:
Make range on answer key for part A 72% to 75% FP Make range on answer key for part B 51% to 53% Lvl.
Reference / Reason:
Drawing OP-MC-IC-IRX-7 l
l 4
1 r
1 .
4 1 i
QUESTION 4.02 Page 27 Concern:
This question requires noma ization of a table out of a Technical Specification 1cttrpretation. Since this document is readily available in the control room for review this is beyond the required knowledge of a Reactor Operator. We feel the operator should be aware that there is an interpretation associated with operating above 100% RTP and refer to this interpretation when necessary.
Recommendation:
Since the RO would have to be aware of a time limit associated with operating above 100% RTP, then we recommend i that both "C" or "D" be accepted for full credit since both answers show interpretation knowledge. Since the limit is 60 min. operating of 30 minutes would also be allowable.
Reference / Reason:
Tech. Spec. interpretations are readily available as ;
reference material in the control room. Student Awareness that there are item limits for operating at 100.5% powec is sufficient to ensure that this interpretations would be referred to under conditions specified in the question.
l i
i I
l
a .
QUESTION 4.05a Page 28 Concern:
Answer key is incorrect. Answer should reflect as follows:
Heatsink - Highest priority (red path conditions)
Suberiticality - 2nd priority (orange path conditions)
Core Cooling does not require prompt action since with conditions specified it is yellow condition.
Recommendation:
Change answer key to correct deficiency i Reference / Reason:
Incorrect answer key 1
l 1
l 1
)
l l
QUESTION 4.08 Page 29 Concern:
Answer key reflects "Identify and Isolate" as one major step. Since these are separate steps in the procedure (EP-04) requiring them to be.placed together as one major step is inappropriate. Major action summary's are subjective and allowance should be given for each action as separate.
Recommendation:
Allow credit for Identify Rutu::ed S/G as one major action and Isolate Ruptured S/G as a separate major action. I Reference / Reason:
EP-04-SGTR 1
l l
i 4
QUESTION 4.09 Page 30 .
f Concern:
Question does not provide sufficient information for the operator to determine if the fuel is conditioned or not.
The question stated that the Reactor had operated at 70% for one week, but it did not say if this was following a refueling shutdown or if the Reactor had operated above 70%
FP prior to the past week of 70% FP operation.
Inaddition, the operating procedures directs the operator to refer to the Data Book for fuel manuevering limits prior to increasing power (OP/1/A/6100/01 page 18 note following step 3.2.75 and OP/1/A/6100 page 1 note following step 2.4).
The operator is not required to memorize this information and it is readily available in the control room.
Recommendation:
Throw out question if question,will not be thrown out accept either of the following as correct.
- 1) Unconditioned fuel - 3%/HR all the way to 100% FP
- 2) Conditioned fuel - 10%/HR to 90% then 3%/HR to 100%
Reference / Reason:
We have no training objectives which requires an RO to memorize the fuel manuevering limits. The fuel manuevering !
limits are readily available in the control room and the l procedures directs the operator to use them when required. ;
1
.a .. e QUESTION 4.11d Page 31 Concern:
Requires operator to memorize Tech. Spec. limits for an infrequent evolution which is highly controlled by procedures.
Recommendation:
Throw out part d Reference / Reason:
We have no training objective that requires this item to be memorized 1
l 1
l l
l l
l P
t l
., _ . _ _ . _ _ . ~ . _ _ _ _ , _ _ .
I QUESTION 4.15 Page 32 3
1 Concern: "
Requiring an RO memorize the "Reactor Site Criteria 10CFR100 dose limits is beyond the scope of an RO's Job. This also .
falls under the guidelines of NURLJ/BR-0122 Examiners ;
Handbook for Developing Operator Licensing Examinations psge l 4-3 item (5) these comments apply to part A and B of this ;
question. '
Recommendation:
Throw out question l
Reference / Reason:
- 1) We have no training objectives which require the operator to memorize this information
- 2) Beyond scope of Ro's Job.
h I
d l
U
- t W
f f
i 4
i e
_ . - ~ u -
Page 33 i
g QUESTION 4.19 Concern:
, The K/A reference listed for this question has no relation to question asked. This question is not supported by a learning objective. The reference used is OP/0/A/6100/08 and this document is and and has been in the process of
, being modified and incorporated into the applicable operating procedures. This particular limit and precaution has been modified and incorporated into the Unit Start-up procedure OP/6100/01 and now reads: "Whenever possible, all shutdown banks should be fully withdrawn anytime reactivity is being added by boron, xenon concentration changes, or control banks."
There are no exceptions listed. OP/0/A/6100/08 is the only place that the limit and precaution as stated in the question appears and this document does not reflect the >
modified version that now appears in the Unit start-up procedure. 6100/08 is to be deleted in the future as all appropriate information is incorporated into applicable procedures.
Recommendation:
Delete question from exam Reference / Reason:
OP/1/A/6100/01 - Unit Start-Up procedure Limit and Precaution 2.12.
Page 34' SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR EXAMINATION COMMENTS' QUESTION 5.01 Concern:
The answer for question 5.01 should be a not c.
Recommendation:
Change answer key Refereuce/ Reason:
Calculation
-A, ; ,
ATi Q 1 ren,
= 3.57 e
f
r .
Page 35 ,
QUESTION 5.07 Same comment as question 1.06 on Reactor Operator Exam i
1 l
l 1
)
Page 36 QUESTION 5.08 Same comment as question 1.08 on Reactor Operator Exam l
r
- ,. -g Page 37 QUESTION 5.09 Concern:
i The answer should be d not b.
Recommendation:
Change key to agree with question 1.10 on RO exam.
Reference / Reason:
RO exam question 1.10 ,
4 t
I i
1, k
I i
-,m.. .m-n--see,--m --.-n.---r, ,,---_g.w.m. -p.,,m--+ ,-y---mer.-g-- ,,e--e.m-,-,m---,w,,,m--_..,,,--y,, ,--.,-,~,,w----er- ~m,wg enwr ,, m g m e, ce em -,w-
Page 38 ;
QUESTION 5.23 concern:
Key Places too much weight on use of average differential boron worth. Realizing that average differential worth is used in a small portion of the concept.
Recommendation:
consider full credit if candidate uses differential boron worth in answer versus average differential boron worth.
Reference / Reason:
Use of average differential boron worth is not essential to explanation of concept.
l l
l l
l l
l l
8 O Page 39 QUEETION 6.02 Same as RO Exam 2.03 i
l l
I i
l I
l l
I I
a ,
j Page 40 QUESTION 6.08 Concern: .
Some candidates may include RF (Fire Protection) as a source of make up to the Spent Fuel Pool.
Recommendation:
Consider accepting "RF" as an alternate answer.
Reference / Reason:
Operational experience, 2 Fire Protection Hose Racks located on Fuel Pool Operating Deck.
l r
i
, , - - - - - .n-
- , - - em, ,. ,v--e a-- nn.- . , . . - - , - - . - . --,-- - , --,-.r,-- ,-- . - , , . ,-e,-- ---n.-, - - , ..w-,, , - , .,--
Page 41 QUESTION 6.09 Concern:
The question was based on a system which has not been installed at this time and which the candidates have not been trained.
Recommendation:
Delete question Reference / Reason:
The MSR Lesson Plan was revised to cover a modification to the system which has not been completed. The candidates were trained on the present system which does not have the features addressed in the question.
l i
Page 42 QUESTION 6.11 Concern:
The question does not implicity ask for the answer as given in that the question asks for why the VCT isolation valves are in series rather that why the VCT needs to be isolated.
Recommendation:
Accept one explanation of why safety related isolation valves are in series as an explanation i.e. single failure criteria, Reference / Reason:
Examiner Handbook 4.5.l(3) 1
- _ , - - - . . , _ _ . , , . . . . _ _ , _ _ . - . _ . , . - _ _ - ~ - , . - - . , _ . . . , . _ . _ , . . _ . _ . . , - - - -
._ . . ~ .
Page 43 l QUESTION 6.13 >
Concern:
The answer key gives equal weight to the second half of the statement excerpted from the Lesson Plan.
Recommendation:
Accept as an alternate, operational answers, with most weight given to Heating the insurge of cooler water from the NC system to saturation. Less weight to flashing when level returns. +
l i
Page 44 QUESTION 6.14 concern:
The key answer is incorrect. As is the note in the RF Lesson Plan. All the back up Heater Feeder Breakers must be manually closed.
Recommendation:
Accept none as the correct answer.
Reference / Reason:
Electrical Controls System description - Pressurizer Heaters (ILE) MCSD-0149-00 4
1 I
i
'Page 45 QUESTION 6.16 Concern:
Error on answer. key and Ref. Lesson indicates PORV's open at 2235 PSI instead of 2335 psig. Some candidates may 'nclude .
spray valves do nct open.
Recommendation:
a) correct answer key to read 2335 psig vice 2235 psig b) Do not penalize for including spray valves do not open.
c) Accept as an alternate response; Pzr PORV's cycle sinca setpoints were not specified as part of the question.
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-PS-IPE pg 26 I
l l
l 1
I i
I
. ~ - . - . - - - - . - - - - , . - . . , , , _ , , , , , . - . - , . . . , , - , , . ,- . - - , _ _ _ .
Page 46 QUESTION 7.16a Concern:
The question does not illicit the entire answer key response. The answer key requires as part of the response "TRIP ALL NC PUMPS". The question asks for "NC Pump Trip criteria" with the implication to give the criteria for tripping the Pumps.
Recommendation:
Delete the statement "Then trip all NC Pumps" from the required resannse.
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-RP-EP4 h
l 4
- .: O Page 47 QUESTION 8.14 Concern:
Ancwer key is correct for provided Tech. Spec. however T.S.
3.1.2.6 Borated Water Sources Requires the Boric Acid Tank Available.
Recommendation:
Accept corrective action for T.S. 3.1.2.6 restore within 72 hr or . . . . as on alternative response.
Reference / Reason:
McGuire Tech. Spec. 3.1.2.6 1
)
i l
i !
l l
l
)
. _ _ . . _ .-, - . __ _ _ . . _ . . -_ -. _ __ ,_ , , - . ._ -._.--,._.----,_x-,. _ , . - , - -
. . .: =
b Page 48 QUESTION 8.15 concern:
-Answer key does not consider acceptable alternate actions prescribed in the provided Tech. Spec.
Recommendation: ,
1 Accept the alternative to restore the valves to operable-within 4 hrs.
Reference / Reason: -'
T.S. 3.7.1.1 -
I I
f I
i W
1
)
i 4
1
( ---
1 e .
l l . .. .
Page 49 QUESTION 7.18a Concern:
The answer key addresses the reason for SI termination following a SGTR. The question asks for the reason for a specific element within the SI termination. criteria.
Recommendation:
In addition to the answer in the key, the following (or similiar wording) should also be correct: to ensure positive control over NCS pressure prior to terminating SI.
Reference / Reason:
OP-MC-RP-EP4
g __
Page 50 QUESTION 6.23a Concern:
i The answer key is correct, however there are other answers :
that may be stated.
Recommendation:
In addition to the answer key either of the following should also be accepted as a correct answer. r
- 1) Carry its own individual load plus the loads of another ,
charger.
- 2) Output rating of 400 amps at 132 VDC.
Reference / Reason:
- 1) Lesson Plan OP-MC-EL-EPL page 11 of 26; col.a
- 2) Lesson Plan OP-MC-EL-EPL (same) page 14 of 26; c.2 ,
I l
t i
l l
o ., ..
Page 51 QUESTICN 8.02 concern: i The answer key indicates that the 3.25 surviellance interval '
was not violated when in fact it was. January the 8th through April the 18th is 101 days. The allowed interval can't exceed 3.25 (31 day) = 100.75 days. Since the surveillance test has not been completed as required then all of the flow paths would be declared inoperable thus invoking 3.0.3.
None of the selections in the quesiton are fully satisfactory. :
i Recommendation:
Throw out question or accept a or d as correct.
Reference / Reason:
See concern f
f I
l l
I
ENCLOSURE 4 SIMULATION FACILITY FIDELITY REPORT Facility Licensee: Duke Power Company Facility Licensee Docket No.: 50-369 and 50-370 Facility License No.: NPF-9 and NPF-7 Operating Tests administered at: McGuire Nuclear Station Operating Tests Given On: April 19-21, 1988 During the conduct of the simulator portion of the operating tests identified above, the following apparent performance and/or human factors discrepancies were observed:
During the exams, there were three instances when the exam area was entered by unauthorized personnel and two instances when outside telephone calls were received on the simulator floor, in each instance, examiners were present to ensure that exams were not compromised. The facility is reminded that even the
- appearance of potential exam compromise is to be avoided at all times.
Examinations given during the week of April 18, 1988, are the last to be given on this simulator. A new facility will be available for future training ano examinations, i
l I
l l
1 1
i