ML20151L856

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2 (Part 1), Equipment Classification Programs (Programs for All Other Safety-Related Components). Response Requested within 45 Days

ML20151L856
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	04/18/1988
From:	Stevens J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Spangenberg F ILLINOIS POWER CO.
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8804220161
Download: ML20151L856 (5)

Text

.

April 18, 1988 DISTRIBUTION:

Docket No. 50-461

• Docket file NRC & Local PDRs PDIII-2 r/f PDIII-2 Plant File GHolahan ACRS(10)

Mr. Frank Spangenberg, Manager LLuther JPartlow Licensing and Safety JStevens EJordan Clinton Power Station 0GC-Rockville P.O. Box 678 Mail Code V920 Clinton, ILL 61727

SUBJECT:

REQUESTFORADDITIONALINFORMATION-ITEM 2.2(PART1)0F GENERIC LETTER 83-28 FOR CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT 1 The staff has reviewed the Illinois Power Company response to the NRC staff position on Item 2.2 (Part 1) "Equipment Classification Programs (Programs for All Other Safety-Related Components)" of Generic Letter 83-28 dated October 1, 1984., Our review of this submittal discloses the need for additional information as described in the enclosed request for additional information.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; the mfore, OM8 clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Please provide your response to this request within 45 days. For further information or clarification please contact me at (301) 492-1397.

Sincerely, Original sianed by/

Janice Stevens, Project Manager Project Directorate III-2 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, Y and Special Projects

Enclosure:

As stated cc: w/o enclosures D. Lasher, SICB/ DEST PDIII-2 PDIII-2 g PD JSteven ww LLuther D er 4/ /g /88 4//.2/88 4//f/88 8804220161 000418 PDR ADOCK 05000461 P PDR

+,

. . _ . . . ~ ... . . ... .. ~. ., . . . .. .. .

iE. -' . .

.i Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg. III Clinton Power Station Illinois Power Company Unit 1 cc: Mr. L. Larson Mr. D. P. Hall Project Manager Vice President General Electric Company Clinton Power Station 175 Curtner Avenue, N/C 395 P.O. Box 678 San Jose, California 95125 Clinton, Illinois 61727 Regional Administrator, Region III Mr. R. D. Freeman 799 Roosevelt Road Hanager-Huclear Station Engineering Opt. Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Clinton Power Station P.O. Box 678 Chairman of DeWitt County Clinton, Illinois 61727 c/o County Clerk's Office DeWitt County Courthouse Sheldon Zabel, Esquire Clinton, Illinois 61727 Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 Wacker Drive Illinois Department Chicago, Illinois 60606 of Nuclear Safety Division of Engineering' Resident Inspector 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR 3, Box 229 A Springfield, Illinois 62704 Clinton, Illinois 61727 Mr. Donald Schopfer Project Manager Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 l

i

--m--

l l

l 1

ENCL 0SURE 1 CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT 1 l DOCKET N0. 50-461 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FORGENERICLETTER83-28, ITEM 2.2(PART1)

Illinois Power Company (IPC), the licensee for the Clinton Power Station, responded to Item 2.2 (Part 1) of Generic Letter 83-28 by a submittal dated October 1, 1984 The staff has reviewed this response and finds that addt-tional information is needed for some of the sub-items of Item 2.2 (Part 1).

The review guidelines used by the staff for these sub-items are listed below, followed by a brief evaluation of the licensee's submittal, and a listing of what the staff concludes is necessary to complete this item.

Item 2.2.1-Program Requested Information The Ifcensee/ applicant should submit a program description which provides assurance that safety-related components are designated as safety-related on plant documents, drawings, procedures, and in information handling systems that are used in accomplishing safety-related activities such as work orders for repair, maintenance, and surveillance testing and orders for procurement of replacement parts.

Evaluation The licensee responded to these requiraments in their October 1,1984 submittal which identified the GE master parts list and the computerized Q-List. However, this submittal does not clearly state that these lists identify all safety-related components and it implies that there are components whose classifico-

' ion as safety-related is not yet determined.

Conclusion The submittal did not provide information confirming that all components designated as safety-related in the Q-List are properly designated on documents and in information handling systems. Tne applicant should provide, for staff review, a description of the program which controls the designation of safety-related components on documents and in information handling systems.

Item 2.2.1.2-Information Handling System  !

Requested Infonnation l

The licensee / applicant should confirm that the program for equipment classification includes an information handling system that is used to identify i

safety-related components. The response should confirm that this information handling system includes a listing of safety-related equipment and that procedures exist which govern its development and validation.

Evaluation The licensee states that the GE master parts list and the Q-List are the "two primary methods" that list safety-related equipment detailed to the component level. This infers that there are other information handling systems for other safety-related equipment. The licensee has indicated that these various equipent listings are being consolidated into a single computerized master equipn.ent list; however no information has been received confirming that this consolidation has been completed and implemented. The procedures governing the consolidation, including how new safety-related items are added, how changes in classification are made, how items are verified, how unauthorized changes are prevented, and how infomation is maintainea and distributed to.

users as a single, official, consistent and unambiguous source of information, were not described.

Conclusion We find that the information contained in the licensee's submittal is not sufficient to allow us to conclude that the source listings have been combined and coordinated into a single information handling system. The licensee shoula describe procedures and controls that illuscrate how the listing (the master equipmnt list) was originally prepared, how new safety-related items are added, b .4 changes in the classification of items are made, how listed items are erified, hcw unauthorized changes are prevented, and how the information is maintained and distributed to users as a single, official, consistent, and unambiguous source of information.

Item 2.2.1.4 Management Controls g uested Information The applicant / licensee should confim that the management controls used to verify that the procedures for preparation, validation and routine utilization of the information handling system have been folloved.

Evaluation l The licensee's submittal does not describe the managerial controls that are applied to assure that the equipment classification infomation handling system (the master equipment list) has been properly prepared, that its contents have been validated, that it is being maintained current, and that it l is being used to determine equipment classification as intended.

Conclusion  !

The' licensee's submittal is inadequate to address this item. The licensee should provide a description of those controls that are used to verify that l

l

• I 1

l the information handling system for equipment classification has been properly ,

prepared, that its contents are validated, that it is being maintained current, i and that it is being used to determine the classi#ication of equipment as '

intended.

l l

I I

J l

l

/

l 1

l

.-- . _ - _ _ _ -.