ML20151K723

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Notification of Investigation Re Dow Corning,Inc Midland,Michigan.W/Partially Deleted Info
ML20151K723
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/21/1994
From: Pawlik E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Hayes B
NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20151K340 List:
References
FOIA-97-180 NUDOCS 9708060151
Download: ML20151K723 (4)


Text

._ - . _ _ . _ . _. ..

.s j' bih ED ST IB 10 -- OT OR V E January 21, 1994 /

h MEMORANDUM FOR: Ben B. Hayes, Director Office of Investigations FROM: Eugene T. Pawlik, Director Office of Investigations Field Office Region 111

SUBJECT:

NOTIFICATION OF INVESTIGATION (01 CASE NO. 3-93-028R)  ;

Dow Corninq Inc.

Licensee / Vendor /Appiicant Docket No(s)/ License No.

Midland. Michiaan NRR-93-A-0039 Facility or Site Location Allegation No.

A. Title of Investiaation What is the matter being investigated? ,

1 s

On June 15 1993, n alleger, who asked for and was granted confiden-tiality( M M Corning, Mid'and, provided the following information related to Dow ichigan, a manufacturer of a silicone foam material f/)l-utilized in the nuclear industry as a fire stop and penetration seal to satisfy NRC fire protec ion criteria.

^~

%,7 3 -

~

i f!.y a.

l

~)l .Q y 9708060151 970730 P FOIA PDR GUNTER97-180 PDR ts DI CL SURE TH UT 01 Ff L

!Li D ISI(( Tl OT ORP)dL 3-i93-028 , nrm [~~

,nwww

LlplTEDDISfRIBUTION--NOTFORPUBLICDISCLOSUREWii.H0VT01APPr{0 VAL Ben B. Hayes 2 January 21, 1994

- e s

F m i. o.t, .m,y ,..s , , 2_ ,

J;

~ -

.;1
:- " . ,,, . . _ _ . .

l

_g, s . . , . . . ww .. .,m_,. . ,,,,_ , . ,, , ,3y. 3 i t i

(d'

~

i k

B. Purpose of Investication

1. What is the basis for the belief that the violation of a regula-tory requirement is more likely to have been intentional or to have resulted from careless disregard or reckless indifference than from error or oversight?

i Dow Corning, who made changes to the formulation of their silicone i seal material, was made aware of test failures in which their sili- i cone seal system was used by Transco. It was also common industry knowledge that ANI had withdrawn their approval of the Dow Corning fire seal system for 9" seals. Allegedly the NRC also made inquiry of this change and its effect on the seals performance, but Dow Corning never filed a Part 21 or made required notification to the NRC or the nuclear industry.

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION -- NOT F0,R PUBb(C DISC)dSURk\plTH T IAfR9/AL

'u 'u

./

1D/'y"" .

e l LIMITED DISTRIBUTION -- NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WITil0VT Ol' APPROVAL [,

Ben B, Hayes 3 January 21, 1994 2 What are the potential regulatory requirements that may have been violated? If no violation, what is the specific regulatory concern?

10 CFR 21.21 Notification of failure to comply or existence of a defect.

(b)(1) A director or responsible officer subject to the.regu-  !-

l. lations of this part or a designated person shall. notify the i . Commission when he obtains information reasonably indicating a  !

failure to comply or a defect affecting . . . (ii) a basic component  !

that is within his. organization's. responsibility and is supplied for l l- a facility or an activity within the United States that is subject l to the licensing requirements under Parts 30, 40, 50, 60, 61, 70, 71  ;

l or 72.of this chapter.  ;

l 10 CFR Appendix R, Fire Protection Program I i

Section lil(G) Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability l j Section M. Fire barrier cable penetration seal qualification 18 U.S.C. 100). Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully f alsifies, conceals, or cover up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

3. What staff members were coordinated with to determine these requirements.or concerns?

Bruce Berson, Regional Counsel, Rill Patrick Madden, Plant Systems Branch, NRR Danielle Oudinot, Plant Systems Branch, NRR C. Technical Staff Priority 1

1. What is the priority of this investigation? l l l

' lligh l

2. What is the initial estimated date of completion of this investigation based upon facts and circumstances known today?
1 4 December 1994 i

i ., /'

i LIMITED DISTRIBUTION -- NOT IOR PUBi,1C Di .LOSU WFTH0llT 0 APPROVAL l

O

%.l  %{l

,_. .. - . - ...~ - - . - ~ .. . - - . - .-

f. ..

~rs /O \ fx -

e L;h,TEDDIS,1RBUTibN--/NOT.FORP LICE 61sCLOSbREWili10VT01A rrt (f \ \ /. s. e l

Ben B. Ilayes 4 January 21,.1994

3. What staff members were coordinated with to determine priority?
J. Lee, NRR r

i D. Of Case Investiaator/ Telephone Number Richard C. Paul, Senior Investigator Office of Investigations field Office, Region 111 l- (708) 829-9672 I  ;

i l- ,

I i l- l l t

! i 1

h i

L Distribution:

c/f s/f 3-93-028R I

)

bi p i

'01: Rill 01: Rill ,

I RPaul:jh EPawlik  !

Olp\ /94 01/g.)/94 l

,)(LIf D') --

D RUI VAL

. . , _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ . . . , , . , . _ _. - .-. _ -- .._ - - l

'% UNiiFD ST Alf R

, , - 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE Or tNVFS11GATIONS Fitt D OFFfCF. IIFulON ill

'g jlgl ,

  1. 799 ft00SEvF.li ItoAD {

,,,,, CLFN EttVN. ILLINotS 60137

  • June 17, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Eugene T. Pawlik, Field Office Director office of Investigations Field Office

,, Region III

~~

FROM: Richard C. Paul, Senior Investigator C Office of Investigations Fleid Office w(

Region III

SUBJECT:

ALLEGED MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT AND FAILURE TO FILE A 10 CFR PART 21 NOTIFICATION BY DOW CORNING On June 15, 1993, provided the following information p related to DOW CORNING of* idland, Michigan, a manufacturer of ,

a silicone foam material utilized in the nuclear industry as a j fire stop and penetration seals to satisfy NRC fire protection criteria.

I 1 - .

e p'

i a-

.i

~

  • ~

> , - . . ~ , -

VM+ ,

~

. 2 c L/ i{

..$ ?

EXHIB!T 3 .93-026 PAGE l OF A PAGE(S) eg,3yyy

/ - 1

s. . -

t j i I

Eugene T. Paw 11k June 17, 1993 ,

4

.I f 9 )

l l

J f

I i 3

't

,.. ~ . - . . .- ,

=y,

. n s avn: .. .: ..:.u :n.,yp n.y . _ .=.._ ,

l

~~ - ,:. a. , , . . . ~ .__ , _

...............y,

. . s . : .. .s m,..,_...._ .., . . . . ,, ........i,.,r.s. ,

, 4 m

, 1 W

i l

l -

B

'fE is recommended this allegation be sent through the NRR Allegation Coordinator. 1 i

cc: CSCO FILE l

l I

// l g]{(rs'. >

/

A., 4 4 e n 4 ~ .-u 46 -44 ,,

L,, .-A _m L A b -

b i

4)

~

~., . . .

, 9-t

& w eA91h ?k + RH>S 1

/t*gg3 a2a m W 4 mw>AdkV n.

g' " % '

ar-fu A kk ,Len2

% va s&n. -t

O Q w
CwAix 6i 4: u$p A Q+

A A es;tLied m fa Q, Q" & ~s % % W &

J 4

i

~

4

a

& j

^^ ~d *~' * " 4 -,_p , 4 4 m, 4a, ,, _

i

+ A D-c # MAJ- C A

W /, p cA.- - AA M kk N a f p // qp H ~ 4 k o e

t- Mcuotut q 3 - c cf $A

, V i M 4

, + % ~LLwJ w a m 5-8-er .

3-C M M

%  ?

a--

h.C yl -4. -x

seg %

A2 4 - A pec e ox h ,

4 I

a l

' L ~~

) (flW

. -