ML20151J810

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-282/97-11 & 50-306/97-11 on 970514- 0625 & Notice of Violation.First Violation Concerns Relatively Large Number of Procedures & Instructions Either Missing Relevant Info or Info That Could Be Misleading
ML20151J810
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/24/1997
From: Grant G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Wadley M
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20151J817 List:
References
50-282-97-11, 50-306-97-11, NUDOCS 9708050260
Download: ML20151J810 (4)


See also: IR 05000282/1997011

Text

~

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - -

--'

l

l

.

. , +

- ,

.

    • a8%

UNITE 3 STATES

,G

{Q

k

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

f

S

REGION til

b

j

801 WARRFNVILLE ROAD

C

g

USLE nUNols 60532-4351

L T. -

.....

siuly 24, 1997

.

Mr M. Wadley, Vice President

Nuclear Generation

Northern States Power Company

414 Nicollet Mall

-

Minneapolis, MN 55401

.

Dear Mr. Wadley:

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION RE." ORT 50-282/97011(DRP); 50-306/97011(DRP);

AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING

PLANT

Dear Mr. Wadley:

'

On June 25,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Prairie Island Nuclear

Generating Plant. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.

Operators performed well during the shutdowns and subsequent startups of both Units

during the assessment period. However, based on the results of this inspection, the NRC

has determined that three vio!ations of NRC requirements occurred. The violations are

cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the circumstances surrounding the e

are described in detail in the subject inspection report.

For the first violation, we are concemed that a relatively large number of the procedures

and instructions reviewed by the inspectors either was missing relevant information or had

information that could have been misleading. The number of examples identified for that

violation indicate that there may be a relatively widespread procedure quality problem.

The corrective actions for the recent trend of procedure adherence and adequacy problems

were discussed at the meeting with you and your staff on May 20,1997, at the Region til

office and have been discussed by the Resident inspector staff with plant staff for the

recent examples in the Notice. These actions include a comprehensive effort to

cha acterize the nature and extent of the problems as applied to the various work groups

and programs at the plant, a subsequent root cause analysis of the major problem areas

identified by the characterization process, and revision of the inadequate procedures prior

to their next use. You indicated that you would meet with us later this summer to discuss

the results of your efforts.

l

A second violation, in which the inspectors identified that the Operations Committee was

observed conducting superficial reviews of procedures, may be one of the contributors to

i

the first violation. We understand that this violation is already receiving significant

()

management attention. The third violation involved not providing adequate emergency

lighting for some safe-shutdown operations in the event of a fire.

k lh lll hl fhlflfflhf lf

9700050260 970724

PDR

ADOCK 05000282

G

PDR

.

-

-

,

.

1

M. Wadley

-2-

!

l

The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for Violation No.1 on

procedure adequacy, and the corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation

i

and prevent recurrence is already adequately addressed as discussed above. Therefore,

you are not required to respond to this letter for Violation No.1 unless the description

does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you

l

choose to provide addition information, you should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice. You are required to respond, however, to this letter for Violations No. 2

and 3 and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing

your response. The NRC will use your respo' 9,in part, to determine whether further

enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

-

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter.

its enclosures, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

l

Sincerely,

.

h.

Geoffrey E. Grant, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.. 50-282, 50-306

License Nos: DPR-42, DPR-60

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report No. 50-282/97011(DRP);

50-306/97011(DRP)

cc w/ encl:

Plant Manager, Prairie Island

John W. Ferrnan, Ph.D.,

Nuclear Engineer, MPCA

State Liaison Officer, State

of Minnesota

State Liaison OINcer, Stato

of Wisconsin

Tribal Council

Prairie Island Dakota ?e amunity

l

-

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ .

_ _ _ _ _

l

'

.

l

[

M. Wadley

-2-

The NRC has concluded that information regarding tha reason for Violation No.1 on

procedure adequacy, and the corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation

and prevent recurrence is already adequately addressed as discussed above. Therefore,

you are not required to respond to this letter for %olation No.1 unless the description

does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you

choose to provide addition information, you should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice. You are required to respond, however, to this letter for Violations No. 2

and 3 and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing

your response. The NRC will use your rest 7se, in part, to determine whether further

enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter,

its enclosures, and your response will be placed in the NRC rubiic Document Room (PDR).

Sincerely,

I

/s/ Ronald N. Gardner for

Geoffrey E. Grant, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 50-282, 50-306

License Nos: DPR-42, DPR-60

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report No. 50-282/97011(DRP);

50-306/97011(DRP)

!

cc w/ encl:

Plant Manager, Prairie Island

'

John W. Ferman, Ph.D.,

Nuclear Engineer, MPCA

State Liaison Officer, State

of Minnesota

State Liaison Officer, State

l

of Wisconsin

Tribal Council

Prairie Island Dakota Community

See attached continued distribution

l

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enci

'

"E" = Copy with attach /enct "N" = No copy

OFFICE

Rlli

6

Rlli

6.

Rllt

h

Grant D

%.

i

NAME

Kunowski:dp4A b

JMcB

i

,

i

DATE

07//197

07/i497

07/h/97

I

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

i

r

l

l

_ . . _ .

. _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _

.

. . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

_

. _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _

..

-

.

M. Wadley

-3-

(Distribution Continued)

L

Docket File w/ encl

DRP w/enci

i

PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl

Rill PRR w/enci

OC/LFDCB w/enct

Prairie Island PM, NRR w/enci

,

SRI Prairie Island w/enci

CAA1 w/enci (E-mail)

Monticello w/ encl

A. B. Beach, w/enct

Rlli Enf. Coordinator, w/ encl

DRS (2) w/ encl

Deputy RA, w/enci

TSS w/enci

l

' DOCDESK (E-mail)

i

l

I

l

-

l

l

!,

I

h

}

,

i

.

l

l

l

!.

._.

_

_

_

. _ , - -