ML20151H758
| ML20151H758 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Farley |
| Issue date: | 04/22/1983 |
| From: | Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082321542 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-92 TAC-51026, TAC-51027, NUDOCS 8305050274 | |
| Download: ML20151H758 (2) | |
Text
f.
APR 2 2 E f
i MEMORANOUM FOR:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing FROM:
Richard H. Vollmer, Ofrector Division of Engineering
SUBJECT:
FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FART.EY HUCLtAR PLANT 00CKtf N04, 00 34n ANO bO 364 (f!A 83 32; TAC'S 51026 & 51027; PA 1162)
Hridirm !! rartusstati tumrimHts AtBy memorandum to 0. Eisenhut f rom J. 0 luni hip the following items.
tu the MinPt fip rulluirementsatfarley (1)
The failure to require all personnel assigned to the plant fire brigade to pass a physical examination for performing strenuous fire fighting activities, (2)
The failure to specify an expiration date on "hot work" permits which are issued to control possible ignition sources within the plant.
Farley Unit I was licensed in 1977 and Farley Unit 2 was licensed in 1 The fire protection programs at both units were reviewed using the lines of Appendix A to Branch Technical Position APCSB 9.5-1 "Guide e-for Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants Docksted Prior to July 1 1976" dated August 23, 1976, Responsibilities, Administrative Control and Quality Assurance "
June 14, 1977.
deviations have been approved.Both Units should meet these guidelines unless "Appendix R Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1 units operating prior to 1979 which had unresolved fire protection issues
, 1979 applies to identified in our Safety Evaluation Reports.
However, any revisions to the fire protection program need to comply with the requirement of Appendix R.
be backfitted to all operating plants regardless of previo Unit 1 had no open items in the Safety Evaluation Rep Because sections of Appendix R do not apply.
, the other plated by the Itcensee have to be consistent with all the requirements of Appendix R.
W 988 W ogggg g h CP, M4/
\\
\\
l
l' h
j 4
- 0. Eisenhut ation for fire brigade members, however, the requirem expiration date or "hot work" permits is only in Appendix R.
physical _ Examination of Fire Bricade NRC has only a requirement for a physical examination for fire brigade members.
licensee's medical professionals, it should be acceptable.As No expiration date on "hot work" permits NRC requirements prior to Appendix R did not specify the need for an expiration date on "hot work" permits.
setting reasonable expiration dates.
We assumed licensees were When Appendix R was issued, we and the duration of the work when the plant was shutdow duration of the work, e.g.latter case, we assume that a specific dat In the days, the work permit would specify the expiration date as the 3 days in the future.
ation date inadequate to control the use of ignitior sources.We d Because these may be generic issues, all Regions should be informed t
Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering cc:
J. Taylor W. Johnston T. Novak G. Lainas F. Miraglia V. Benaroya
- 0. Parr R. Ferguson W. Shields S. Pawlicki T. Sullivan T. Wambach R. Eberly J. Stang
- 0. Kubicki F. Nolan E. Reeves
- 0. Notley DE/gEB h/ WW OdkC 0 /0 RFerguson VB naroya WJohnston R ollmer 4/)3/83 4jyB3 4/l'd/83 4 @ 83