Text

Discusses SALP Repts 50-321/86-42 & 50-366/86-42 & Forwards Viewgraphs from 870406 Meeting.Util 870506 Written Comments Have Been Reviewed.Proposed Improvements Will Be Monitored During Future Insp
	ML20151F853
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	04/11/1988
From:	Grace J; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Head G; GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
	NUDOCS 8804190021
	Download: ML20151F853 (23)
	v • d • e

bL d

'

-

..

,

ur

-

.

APR 11 1988

Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366

License Nos. DPR-57, NPF-5

Georgia Power Company

(ATTN: Mr. George F. Head

Senior Vice President-

Nuclear Operations

P. O. Bex 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORPANCE

REPORT NOS. 50-321/86-42 AND 50-366/86-42

This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)

Board Report for your Hatch f acility which was sent to you on March 4,1987;

our meeting of April 6,1987, at which we discussed this report; and your

written comments dated May 6,1987, relative to the report.

We have reviewed

your written comments and will monitor the improvements you are proposing

during future inspections.

Additionally, a photocopy of the slides that were used during the presentation

has been enclosed.

No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions

concerning these matters, I would be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

J.

telson Grace

Regional Administrator

Enclosure:

Presentation Slides

cc w/ encl:

J: T. Beckham, Vice President, Plant Hatch

4f C. Nix, Plant Manager

4: M. Fraser, Site Quality Assurance (QA)

Supervisor

(LT Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety

and Licensing

bec w/ encl:

(See page 2)

8804190021 880411

PDR

ADOCK 05000321

Q

CCD

j

l

.

HW

f.a

.

-

..

.

Georgia Power Company

2

APR 11 1988

Wf{c w/ encl:

be

C Resident Inspector

D3S Technical Assistant

ufugh S. Jordan, Executive Secretary

Document Control Desk

State of Georgia

Yl

llgp

R!

RII

RIl

RII

WE

4 Sin $

/ VBr,)o.!

MErns/'t

c

0

4'A/W/88

kule

wnlee

LTrocine

Reyes

4/5~/88

~ 4/[/88

T';,'4/f/88

.

4/'f/88

a.l

UNITED STATES

-

NUCTRAR REGUIATORY

.

-

COMMISSION

'

-

a

.

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT

.

OF

,,i

>

r

!

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

B-

"

.

'

(SALP)

-

'

l'L

.

cLid c 2.

..

.,

,

O

GEORGIA

3 0 M Re

C0RP0RA"::0X

-July =1,1985

= December =3-1=1988

_

?MT-EATC3-DI"S-::-&-2

-

._

April =6r:.987

3ax:.ey,-Georgia

.

l

- - - . - . . . , , . - . - - - . . - - - - - , - . - - - - - - . - . - - ,

.

..- --_ _-- ---.,.--- .-- -- .-. .

-- -- -. - . .

.- .--- , - - -

-,--

.

L

.

'

.

-

.

sua

3

SAT,P ~ PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

'

a,e n.ueu

u

_

a

.

$stP Obj c'c.1$ 51 Me b

1.

IMP. ROVE LICENSEE

PERFORMANCE

.

2.

PROVIDE

A BASIS FOR ALLOCATION'

OF

bRC

RESOURC'ES

.

3.

INPROVE

NRC

REGU_ATORY

3ROGRAN

-

E

- .

I

-

0

-

--- -

..

_

-

--

.!

-

..

.

..

,

.

g u ae y

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS

l

FOR OPERATING REACTORS

.

_

3

,

1.

PLANT OPERATIONS

i

..

2.

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

3.

MAINTENANCE

4.

SURVEILLANCE

5.

FIRE PROTECTION

,

6.

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

.

7.

SECURITY

8.

OUTAGES

9.

QU#LITY PROGRAMS

10.

LICENSING ACTIVITIES

11.

TRAINING

-

. . -

- . .

__

- _ _ ..-_-

_ _ _

.

_

-_

_

.

._

.

. -

_

-

- -

-

--

.

'

suoe

.t

'

.

1

AREA PERFORMANCE

CA TEGORY

1

REDUCED NRC ATTENTION MAY

BE

AP3ROPRIATE.

LICENSEE

MAbAGEMENT

ATTENTION

AND

INVOLVEMENT

ARE

AGGRESSIVE

AND ORIENTED TOWARD

NUCLEAR SAFETY:

_ICENSEE

RESOURCES

,

ARE

AMPLE AbD EFFECTIVELY

USED

SUCH

THAT

A HIGH

_EVEL

OF

PERFORMANCE

WITH

RESPECT

TO

OPERATIONAL

SA

ETY OR CONSTRUCTION

IS BEING ACHIEVED.

'

4

I

.

--

.-

.

__ __

-

_ _

. -

-

- -

. _ - - .

- _

..

_

- _

-

. . -

.

. -

.

ScioE

6,

'

-

L

AREA PERFORMANCE

CMEGORY 2

NRC ATTENTION

SHOULD

BE MAIN-

TAIbED AT

NORMAL LEVELS.

LICENSEE

MAbAGEMEb" ATTENTION

AND

INVOLVE-

' , . .

MENT

ARE EVIDEbT

AND

ARE

'

CONCERNED WITH

NUCLEAR SAFETY:

LICEbSEE

RESOURCES

ARE

ADEQUATE

AND

ARE REASONABLY EFFECTIVE

SUC4

THAT SATISFACTORY

PERFORVANCE

WITH

RESPECT

TO 03ERATIONAL

'

SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTIDs

IS BEING

ACHIEVED.

i

.

<

l

'

i-

!

-

T-

-

.

.'

.

-

og y

T

AREA PERFORMANCE

CA TEGORY 3

.

BOTH NRC

AND LICENSEE ATTENTION

SHOULD

BE

INCREASED.

LICENSEE

MANAGEMENT ATTENTION OR INVOLVE-

MENT IS ACCEPTABLE

AND CONSIDERS

NUCLEAR SAFETY,

BUT WEAKNESSES

ARE EVIDENT:

LICENSEE

RESOURCES

APPEAR

TO

BE STRAINED OR NOT

EFFECTIVELY

USED SUCH THAT

MINIVALLY SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE

WITH RESPECT

TO OPERATIONAL

SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING

s.,

.r, e,

, a /<a/ .rs Cr /e10

an.4 c

A C H I E V E D.

g

& ,.,,,.,g, g ,, s ,,z ,y 3

is

, up y n

pa y,a , Ac~e.w , a

,

e.,,,, ed

i,.c , e.isd ~,..ye-~, /

age ,60,,

a, niu s<<a u <pa.~, Aw' s,u/ m,

a s u H <,;

I

de, e.nec/

ssouE,

ach4 in se aier.

--_.

_

-.

.-.

-

- -

..

.

._

':

'

SOpe

&

'

.-

'

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1.

MANAGEMENT

INVOLVEMENT IN

ASSURING QUALITY

2.

APPROACH

TO RESOLUTION

OF

TECHvICAL

ISSUES FROM

THE

SAFETY STANDPOINT

3.

RESPONSIVENESS

TO NRC

INITIATIVES

k

4.

ENFORCEMENT HISTORY

I

5.

RE3ORTING

AND ANA_YSIS

OF

!

REPORTABLE

EVENTS

6.

STA :ING

(INCLUJING

MANAGE-

N ENT)

,

7.

TRAIbING EFFECTIVEbESS AbD

QUALIFICATION

I

-

.

.-

_-.

..

. _ _

.

-

~

cl,A

cf

.

...

..

V 0_A~ 05

S

V V AP

u _Y ' , ' 985

-

J EC EV 3 ER 3'

,

' 985

,

I

Il

Ill

IV

V

-HATCH 1

0

1

.35

11

~ HATCH 2

0

1

31

8

REGION ll AVE

0

2

19

7

i

,

a

1

.

'

,

l

-

i

~

i

3

!

_A \\

-

- A- C

-

_ERs

!

)

JULY 1985

-

DECEMBER 1986

[

.

l

PERSONNEL

l

f

_

,

,-

_

^

_

-

_

\\

!

_-\\^

_

/

51.1 %

l

-

/

i

l

\\

t

!

l

-

,

I

14.9%

28.7%

OTHER

,

I

COMPONENT FAILURE

-

DESIGN 5.3~

'

i

4

,l

O

~~

,

fc)

'

o

I

_

'

O

.

g

..

3 _A N

-AC-

Rs

-

.

J U LY

1985

DECEMBER

1986

.

'

- -

94

LEGEND

so--

OTHER

__

_

TEST / CAL.

'A,j

-

MAINTENANCE

70--

' *

OPERATING

,.

b

OTHER

80- -

j

5..

48

[/2

COMPONENT FAILURE

5~

an

.

DESIGN

-

u

A

PERSONNEL

_

g..

_ _ _ - _ - . _ . _ _ _ .

20--

e

10- -

1

P

o

-

PLANT

PERSONNEL

j

~

l

__

_

__

..

3 _A \\

- A C-

_ERs (3 ersonne )

.

~

JULY 1985

-

DECEMBER 1986

'

.

TEST & CAUBRATION

41.7%

~*

.

12.5%

OPERATING

OTHER

18.8%

-

MAINTENANCE

$

Es

n

5

.

. . .

--

-

---

. - -

__

..

._.

.

I

- .

}

l

=

t

AVERAGE

NUMBER

OF

REACTOR

TRIPS

PER

1000

CRITICAL HOURS

~

JULY 1985

DECEMBER

1986

-

3.0 --

!

i

l

M

2.5 --

f

gao

!

r

'

d

!

op 2.0 --

i

_

i

%o

'

oo

I

oq s.s--

i

t.n

>

b

1.14

g

z,

y

,-

'

'I ~ '

u

1.0--

'

o

', ? : 142

.84

,

et

'-

7/,

.

/f

'Ul

,.

@

?,}p

Us

' , ,

.s --

"; , s

v

_

-

's

3

. . '

/

- ;

.

p

,

O

"l

'

I

~

NATIONAL AVE

HATCH 1

HATCH 2

.

-

- - -

--

_-

.

-

.

LERs

PER

UNIT

JULY

1985

DECEMBER

1986

-

~

58

9'::

/,

,7/

4y

';'

($I

44

,4 s

43

,

'

e

.

,

-

7,

$

f'

,.

'

' '

so--

'

' ' /.

_

,

, .

/,

$

E

-

24

V:'/,

'

_,

V/-(

g

'

o

.

,?

,

1

.

^

.

GE

' HATCH

WEST.

CE

B&W

NATL AVE

.

s

PLANT TYPE

e*

J

_ _ _ .

._

..

,

.

. .

OPERATIONS PHASE VIOL.ATIONS/ OPERATING

REACTOR

J U LY

1,1985

DECEMBER

31,1986

-

'

go.-

3

so--

y9'

5

=

ts

-

,

-

i$ e-

c-;f

%

f'/

F /

e

r

7<

,

z

n

/

,I

k

y '* "

,N, $

[f

-

a

, . . -

o

/

m,/

D.

,E

.-[

7/

'

g

y-

-z

-

g

g 2o--

'

g

p,g;

.

=

.

e

.

,

<

cg

-

. ,

>/

.

.-

c

.

-

,

_

-

,

-

?

so--

(z. /

g'l

.

,

-

m

- -

z.

/

5::x

.

,.

.

,.

.

-

.

G,

f

pf

.

-

.

.

-

%

'

K

c

.

-

6

f

.

o-

.

q.

FPC

GPC

FPL

DUKE

VEPCO

APC

,

TVA

MPL

Ril WG

CPL

SCE&G

!

UTILITY

'

,

- -

-

. _

_ _

.___.

,

-

.

ALLEGATIO NS

PER

UTILITY / SITE

.

JULY 1,

1985 - DECEMBER 31,

1986

ao --

.

.*

T

'

..

i

o

, ,?

l

so--

'

. - -

Q1

l .-

'

m

&

N

/ ,, .

en

t

Z

-

,

o so. .

'

l

Q

'

o

LL'

a

"

's

-

,

-

,4:

R

': ,

' '

u.

.-

<

o

20--

4: G

b

'

C

.o

~

8

-'

7

->

-

.-

Z

' . ,

/,,

-

.,

4:>

/,

to--

'<y

/g 2

au

v\\

i

p

-

,,/

. , ,

. ,jn

4v

? 's

>,

c

%,

):; i/

//, ,:/

/,.

M

W

-

,

/$h

D

,

': -

/

3,A

6

/. /

,

n

en

4.9

. .-

.

? ,'

'

-

4??

/

J;'

V7

^ :'4

_

-

+p?

'

~~

~

/

T

r

i

o-

W-

-W-W-

'

-

n

i

TVA

GPC

CP&L VEPCO FPC

FPL

MPL

DUKE SCE&G APC RIt AVE

1

)

<: -

>

.

i;'

.

<

_

'.

_

CZOI OZ)p

>Zm>

OO{0>2gOz

'

-

qOg

Zmg OZ

=

l>

Ed R@

-

_

2:

)

A'

Fn o @ U

~

57

)

m

hb0

(

L

-

o

-

2

-

'

G:

b'

1

)

N

NS gM84N

'/-

1

3

N

\\

1

3

6

%

(

W

i

\\

iagM84u

!

0

%

i

1

5

\\

N

i

._

(

)

/c$ -hy u

si[

-

\\

A"u

\\

_

S

9

E

l

w"mg5st

N

\\

jyi

-

T G

I

(s

D

W

_

CIUN

y' pS

! ,eo

i

-

I

8

T

\\

N

A .:

m

i. $S m

.

A R

F

h

\\

W

D

\\

-

,

3)

-

h

F G

_

-

)5h

O N

)7-

M

.i

-Y

W

R

W

\\

E

J

E

d

C

3

n

\\

B E"

_

%]\\W W

v

(.

h

-

7

(

M R

5

U

N

5

\\

0

2

l

N

'

(2

T 6E

j

.

(

s

W

% o 5. ! d q

8

\\

w

\\

-

4

s

4

j

N

)

>

. :

s

's

i

d

@

,

v-

W . xW

.

(

)

n \\

1 5E 31 kds5-

.

i

e

-

5; b8 9

-

9

%

s

3

i

N

s

0t.

l

\\ c,.

\\

t

l

@

z

-

.

2

s

%

i

.

s

t

@

o

-

%

\\)W

\\w

.

\\

a

%

s

4F S1m

\\E

\\

,

JJ

2

-,

4

\\

_

ul

NM%'M'K*Nhli

.

%

l

J, \\

u

%

N

' s

~ h

_

-

s

N

2

m

_

\\

%

-

3

%

\\'\\

-

_

i

1

_

'N

q

$

-

A m!;

_

SAM

p

@

o

's

-

h

s

L

l

L

-

o

L

.

om"

go n@

Eji

eE<

mI TA'

,

.

--

_

[ $ H 6 Z k > :o h

a

_

-

.

_

.

_

'

_

1

il

ll

ll\\

lj

jl

.!

.l

!i

ll

ll!l

.

ill

1

&

G

FUNCTIONAL AREA

COMPARISON

~

FOR

REGION

11

FACILITIES

.

2

a

'2"

LEGEND

-

CATEGORY 1

'o-

f

CATEGORY 2

s

i

s

.:::

c zm mR

>

i

=

i

- -

-

is

/y

?

f2

/

=:: 3=~A

/

n .. - ~ n a . ,n.,

-

E!

-

f

2

'l

f

~

a

n

i

7

i

m=.

/

y/

n/

/

n/

-

!!

g /

/

/ =-

-

^~

kh

h

bha zh

'i :::::::"'C

2

s

s/:c n

i

n s

Eft $p/'

i

-

.

p/

/

!.I_f$y/-t/

-

gpg

/

$'gis

=

-

p

=-

!

.v

-

a

,

p

FIRE

SEC

REFL

QP

lC

TRNG

FUNCTIONAL AREA

-

M

.

- - - - - -

. , . _ _ _ -

-

--

,

.__

-

,

-

sua s

-

.

,

, 3,e

,,p

,e,e

,e

(

-

.J

m

..

m

mm

-

ML20151F853

Text

Navigation menu

Search