ML20151B957

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-344/88-17
ML20151B957
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/1988
From: Pate R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Cockfield D
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8807210171
Download: ML20151B957 (1)


See also: IR 05000344/1988017

Text

_.

.

pog

+

.-

-

.

JUL - 81988

~

Docket No. 50-344

Portland General Electric Company

121 SW Salmon Street

Portland, Oregon -97204

Attention:

Mr. David W. Cockfield

Vice President, Nuclear

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter dated June 22, 1988,-in response.to our Notice of

Violation and Inspection Report No. 50-344/88-17, dated May 23, 1988,

informing us of the steps you have taken to correct the items which we brought

to your attention. Your corrective actions will be verified during a future

inspection.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Ori inaJ S',9ned

9

Robert J. Pate, Chief

Reactor Safety Branch

bec w/ copy of letter cated 6/22/88:

Resident Inspector

'

Project Inspector

G. Cuck

j

A. Johnson

B. Faulkenberry

J. Martin

J. Zollicoffer

Docket File

bcc w/o copy of letter dated 6/22/88:

M. Smith

5@3 L <h

,

REGION V

DPe

/Joari

e

a

J

EST COPY 7

EST COPY ] REQUEST-

Y.]

/ N0

S ES >/ NO

] YES / NO

]

V

~

S

TO PDR ]

ES. / NO

]

-

TE0[\\

'

8807210171 880708

PDR

ADOCK 05000344

O

PDC

.-

.

,,

-

._.

.~

.

.

-

-

-

.

g

.

RECEIVED

-

=

NRC

-

Portland General Electric Company

REGION V

.,

.

David W. Cockfield Vice President. Nuck

g

pg * $2

June 22, 1988

Trojan Nuclear Plant

Docket 50-344

Licenso NPF-1

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cennission

Attn:

Document Control Desk

Washington DC 20555

Dear Sir:

Response to a Notice of Violation

Your lotter of May 23, 1988 transmitted a No'. ice of Violation based upon

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report 50-344/88-17, Fire

Protection Program Implementation.

Our response to the Notico of Violation

is provided in the Attachment to this letter.

Sincerely,

,

Attachment

c:

Mr. John B. Hartin

Regional Administrator, Region V

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mr. Bill D'ixon

State of Oregon

Department of Energy

Mr. R. C. Barr

NRC Resident Inspector

Trojan Nuclear Plant

70^/>7A?in

//

vovw- v v er v

,

ws ta ,s e m om 9:ra

.

.

' ' , .

. . , .

,

.

Trajtn Nuclotr Pltnt

Docket 50-344

Document Control Desk

License NPF-1

June 22, 1988

Attachment

Page 1 of 3

RESPONSE TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Violation:

As a result of the inspection conducted on April 18-21, 1988, and in accor-

dance with the "General Policy and Procedures for Nuclear Regulatory Commis-

sion (NRC) Enforcement Actions" Title X, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50

(10 CFR 50), Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the following violation was identified:

Amendment No. 22 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-1 required the

installation of early warning fire detectors over the radwaste storage

area, new fuel storage area, and the spent fuel pool storage area of the

93-ft elevation of the Fuel Building by the end of the 1979 Refueling

Outage.

Contrary to the above, as of April 20, 1988, the required fire detectors

for the radwaste storage area, the new fuel storage area, and spent fuel

pool storage area of the 93-ft elevation of the Fuel Building were not

installed.

No fire detectors were installed to provide the required

early warning capability.

This is considered a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1.D).

Portland Gen 9ral Electric (PCE) Response:

PGE acknowledges the violation, in part, as outlined below.

1.

Reason for the violation:

PGE has verified that the subject fire detectors were installed prior to

the end of the 1979 Refueling Outage as required by Amendment No.

22 to

the Operating License.

The subject detectors were subsequently removed. A fire detection system

survey performed by a licensed fire protection engineer in 1984,

conclu-

ded these detectors should be removed since all of these detectors were

in areas not required to achieve safe shutdown, did not comply with the

spacing and location requirements of National Fire Protection Association

(NFPA) 72E, "Automatic Fire Detectors", and if installed per NFPA 72E

would not respond adequately to smoldering fires.

,

The wording of the license condition contained in Amendment No. 22 did

not specifically require the mrdifications be maintained ad infinitum.

It reads:

"The licensee may proceed with and is required to com-

plete the modifications identified in Paragraphs 3.1.1

through 3.1.18 of the NRC's Fire Protection Safety

Evaluation Report on the Trojan Nuclear Plant dated

March 22, 1978.

These modifications shall be completed

',,

-

M

i

.

, _

,

Tesjan Nuclear Plant

Docket 50-344

Document Control Desk

License NPF-1

June 22, 1988

Attachment

Page 2 of 3

by the end of the second refueling outage of the Trojan

facility and prior to return to operation for Cycle 3.

In addition, the licensee shall submit the additional

information identified in Table 3.2 of this safety

Evaluation Report in ac,cordance with the schedule con--

tained therein. In the event these dates for submittal

cannot be met, the licensee shall submit a report

explaining the circumstances, together with a revised

schedule".

PCE's interpretation of the license condition was that the fire detection

system could be changed under the prtvisions of 10 CFR 50.59 and that NRC

approval was not required for subseqtent fire protection program changes.

As noted in Generic Letter 86-10, "I.aplementation of Fire Protection

Requirements", this has been a ca.iusing issue industry-wide.

Generic Letter 86-10 notes that "variations have created problems for licensees

and for NRC inspectors in identifying the operative and enforceable fire

protection requirements at each facility.

These license conditions also

create difficulties because they do not specify when a licensee may make -

changes to the approved program without requesting a license amendment".

It should be noted that the evaluation and decision to remove thn detec-

tors occurred well before the issuance of Generic Letter 86-10,

2.

Immediate corrective action:

PGE has initiated a review of the status of the modifications committed

to be made as referenced in the Amendment No. 22 licenso condition.

3.

Corrective steps to be taken to avoid further violations:

PGE submitted License Change Application (LCA) 151, "Fire Protection Pro-

gram" to the NRC on December 24, 1987 to implement the standard fire

protection license condition recommended by Generic Letter 86-10.

The

Trojan Fire Protection Program is currently, by reference, part of the

{

Trojan Final Safety Analysis Report.

Therefore, upon NRC approval of

{

LCA 151 the ability to evaluate and modify fire protection program fea-

tures under 10 CFR 50.59 will be available.

the potential of any_similar violations.

That process will eliminate

,

Any discrepancies identified in the review noted in Item 2 above betwoon

the 1978 SER commitments and the present Plant configuration will be

evaluated.

PCE will submit these completed evaluations for NRC review

i

and approval.

These evaluations will either justify the present Plant

configuration or state the sebe ule for modifications, as necessary, to

conform to the 1978 SER ano Supplements.

.

-

-

-

- - - - - - -

- -

-

- -

-

. - - - - -

-

  • *

, . ,

J

'

Trojan Nuclear Plant

Document Control Desk

'

Docket 50-344

June 22, 1988

License NPF-1

Attachment

Page 3 of 3

.

.

4.

The date when full compliance will be achieved:

Approval of LCA 151 by the NRC is on. hold, pending issuance of additional

generic guidance. PGE will revise LCA 151 as required to comply with NRC

requirements.

The evaluations and/or modification plans described in Item 3 above will

be submitted for NRC revidw and approval by December 1, 1988.

.

.

1

l

)

'l

'1

.

DRS/DJM/rrp

2717P

.

- - - . - -

. _ . . , _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . , _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . . .

.-

_.

_ , . _

4