ML20151B762
| ML20151B762 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/1988 |
| From: | Baer R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151B761 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8804110211 | |
| Download: ML20151B762 (45) | |
See also: IR 05000285/1988005
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
'9
c. ..
MEETING SUMMARY
Licensee: Omaha Public Power District
. Facility: Fort Calhoun Station
License No: DPR-40
Docket No: 50-285
SUBJECT: ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AND
SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS IDENTIFIED IN NRC INSPECTION REPORT
50-285/88-05
On March 21, 1988, representatives from the Omaha Public Power District met
with NRC Region IV personnel in Arlington, Texas, to discuss the circumstances
surrounding six apparent violations and seven significant findings identified
in NRC Inspection Report 50-285/88-05 and the licensee's position regarding
these apparent violations. The NRC's concern regarding the lack of effective
corrective action and the apparent degradation of the radiation protection
program were also discussed. The meeting was held at the request of the NRC.
The attendance list for this conference is attached as Appendix A to this
summary.
The licensee representative responded that all violations identified in NRC
Inspection Report 50-285/88-05 did occur. The licensee identified the
circumstances surrounding each violation and their corrective actions or their
planned corrective action and when these actions would be completed. The
licensee discussed the Radiological Improvement Project (RIP) being undertaken
to improve their radiological protection program. The first step of the RIP
included independent assessments to:
* Identify areas needing upgrading to meet NRC standards and industry
practices (completed March 17, 1988).
* Identify improvements to meet INPO Guidelines (completed
Marc 5 19, 1988).
* Evaluate all aspects of the licensee's nuclear operation (complete
by June 1, 1988).
The major components of the RIP were identified as:
* A new radiation protection manual with a policy / plan and simple,
clear implementing procedures.
* New instruments and equipment in service.
8804110211 8100404
PDR
O ADDCK 05000295
ED
- - . - , _ . - . _ - - .
J
.
, . . - ,.
-2-
* A staff reorganization including training.
* Other improvements identified during plan development' and review
stages.
The licensee stated they would be submitting a letter to Region IV: formally
committing to the RIP.as presented.
The licensee also responded to special questions regarding the significant
. findings (open' items) identified in Inspection Report 50-285/88-05 and
acknowledged that they would respond to these items in writing when the Notice
of Violation is received.
The senior NRC representative acknowledged the licensee's presentation and
stated that the Region IV recommendation concerning enforcement action for
these apparent violations would be forwarded to the NRC Office of Enforcement
.for their concurrence. After review by that office, the licensee would be
notified in writing of the NRC's proposed enforcement action.
R. E. Baer, Radiation Specialist 3/30/88
} g Facilities Radiological Protection ' Dtte
Section
Attachment:
Attendance List
,
! N .,
--
'
,
l84 NFS
APPENDIX A.
ATTENDANCE LIST
Attendance at the Omaha Public Power District NRC Enforcement Conference on
March 21, 1988, at the NRC Region IV office:
~
Omaha'Public Power District
W. C. Jones, Senior Vice President
R. L. Andrews, Division Manager, Nuclear Production
A. D. Bilau, Plant Health Physicist
M. W. Butt, Senior Engineer
J. J.. Fisicaro, Supervisor, Nuclear Regulatory and Industrial Affairs
F. F. Franco, Manager, Radiological Health and Emergency Planning
W. G. Gates, Manager, Fort Calhoun Station
R. L. Jaworski, Senior Manager, Technical Services
G. L. Roach, Supervisor, Chemical and Radiation Protection
NRC
J. M. Montgomery, Deputy Regional Administrator
R. L. Bangart, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
R. E. Baer, Senior Radiation Specialist
A. B. Beach, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
R. E. Hall, Deputy Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
P. H. Harrell, Senior Resident Inspector, Fort Calhoun Station
D. R. Hunter, Technical Advisor, Division of Reactor Projects
*P. D. Milano, Project Manager, Nuclear Reactor Regulation
R. Mullikin, Project Engineer, Division of Reactor Projects
B. Murray, Chief, Facilities Radiological Protection Section
H. L. Scott, Acting Enforcement Officer
L. A. Yandell, Chief, Radiological Protection and Safeguards Branch
* Telephone communication during conference.
l- ! l , i l
j
.
, .. .. , ORT CALHOUN S- ATION !
RADIOLOGICAL IVPROVEV ENT 3 loc ECT
-iEALTH PHYSICS VEETING
l l NRC - OPPD
# N
I"'k h IE
EBMHIEJENRN$UlEE lillig
: k ?:Nh
.
4 4
_
~
MARCH 21,1988 !
,
y, .- ---..,.,,,-------,.--.-_y_,,_,. . _- - , , . _ _ _.-_ _,._..- ___- - -
- - - - - - - - , .
.
o, ..
RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NRC/0 PPD MEETING AGENDA
March 21, 1988
I. INTRODUCTION R. L. Andrews
II. VIOLATIONS - SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTIONS G. L. Roach
*
Completed
*
Planned
*
Results Achieved
III. RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT R. L. Jaworski
A. Purpose / Responsibilities
8. Interim Program
C. Improvement Program
D. H. P. Technician and Management Conferences
IV. ASSESSMENTS / FINDINGS SUMMARY
A. Compliance Assessment F. F. Franco
B. Excellence in Operations (EIO) F. F. Franco
C. Independent Appraisal F. F. Franco
V. RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PLAN F. F. Franco
VI. CLOSING W. C. Jones
_
$*
.--. ,- , , - - -- --,.-. , - . , - . - - , . - - - -
4
96 t 0
'
O
I. INTRODUCTION
,
1 I i
O
O
,
- _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _D
. . . . . ._ . . . _ . . . . . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . - . _ _ _ .____ .
. ..
, . . . . ,
i '
-
VHRA DOOR RELATED
LONG TERM ACTIONS INITIATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 25, 1988
Date initiated
PROJECT 1991 9/1/87
Root Cause Analysis Project
Procedures Upgrade Project
l . CHANGE 0VT OF. LOCK SETS 10/15/87 i
PERSONNEL CHANGES 10/15/87
PLANNING 0F MONITORED STRIKES Fall 1987
() INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL OF NUCLEAR FUNCTIONS 12/15/87
, EXCELLENCE IN OPERATIONS 1/13/88
Self Assessment
SMALL GROUP MEETINGS 1/15/88
a 1 1
.
: O
J a
"T'**7WY'T 9
'
M'M TD- M*T = M T D g y-Dg'Wyupges 9 mmhe .-
..-
**
GLR SL10E #1
-VIOLATION 8805-01
- p,
- ,g
Reasons for the Violation
A. Unclear training manual requirements.
B. Management misinterpretation of training requirements.
Actions that Have Been Taken Results Achieved
A. The training records of health A. Three technicians were determin-
physics technicians were reviewed. ed to be partially unqualified.
8. The work history of each unqualified B. No technicians had performed
technician was reviewed. unqualified work during or after
the requalification period.
C. Training manual requirements were C. Health Physics qualified person-
reviewed, nel fall under requalification
requirements.
D. Requalification training was D. One decertified technician has
accelerated. completed 1987 requalification.
E. Training Supervisor provides E. Only fully qualified Health
periodic status of technician Physics Technicians are
requalification. utilized.
Actions that Will be Taken
l
The Training Program Master Plans will be revised by September 1,1988.
!
Results of Our Actions
!
All personnel in authority agree on the meaning of the training requirements
.
I
and no personnel are performing tasks for which they are not qualified. O
_
.
s. . .*
GLR SLIDE #2
VIOLATION 8805-02
Reasons for the Violation
A. Established procedures not followed.
B. Personnel assumed that actions taken were effective.
C. Personnel verification was ineffective.
d
D. Previous corrective actions were incomplete.
O
I t
O
. _-_ - . .- - . . . - ._ -
. _ . .-
.=
, ..
---
^ GLK SLID E #3
-
CORRIDOR 4 '
'
Ele v. 989 o
I
(---.
}ETOC,U)Al '
IFil 76R S
-
I
1
i O.j
6_ , c
I'
,! ,
sn
(,
Ii
RmllI Ii
i
i' L
l ,I
., >
,ai,
:
1 Oi '
A MAsf8
g
if/LTEh5 '
'
o I
3 '_,cOa li
i
-
; ,
.
o ,I t
! y ,
I
!
1
l ,
2
i
W4 f-
069) P.Altzf2S
I
f f
'
%
( Rm IIA
.,
.
.. ..- . . .. - -_ . _ - - . ---
..
.. ...
GLR SLIDE #4
.
VIOLATION 8805-02 ,
i
'
:
.
Immediate Actions Taken Results Achieved
A. .No personnel were in Room 11, the A. No personnel received radiation ex-
door was locked. posure-in uncontrolled manner. The '
door's condition was in compliance
with requirements.
B. Management personnel were noti- B. Corrective actions and investiga-
fled. tive actions were initiated.
C. Other VHRA barriers outside C. Confirmation of proper barrier
containment were locked, status was made.
D. A red HP padlock was placed on D. This locking device provided
the Room 11 door from Corridor 4. complete door control.
i
E. Management conducted investiga- E. Sequence of events and parties
tions,
involved were identified.
LO l l l lO l . .
.
... .*
GLR SLIDE #5
p).
%
VIOLATION 8805-02
Actions Taken after January 25. 1988 Results Achieved
A. A "two-man rule" was A. Radiological safety has been
proceduralized. assured.
B. The Plant Health Physicist's 8. Possibly improper radiological
field observation has increat activitias are immediately
corrected.
C. A senior level Health Physicist C. The Plant Health Physicist has been
was returned to health physics relieved of some burdens and is
from training duties. freer to observe and direct field
activities.
D. Employee-Management conferences D. Procedural compliance has signifi-
have been held to emphasize cantly increased.
procedural compliance.
E. Licensee Event Report 88-001 and E. Timely notification to NRC.
Civil Pena'e ty response to VHRA
door violation were prepared and
submitted to the NRC.
F. The incident was discus::ed with F. Our investigations shared with NRC.
the NRC Senior Resident Inspec-
tor and the NRC inspection team.
G. A project team has been formed. G. Organizing and conducting investi-
gative efforts. Determining root
cause and corrective actions.
H. Compliance assessment conducted. H. No items of regulatory noncompliance
have been identified.
. I. Policy to provide entry watch I. No VHRA's uncontrolled.
restated.
J. Excellence in Operations J. Understanding nrngram status,
assessment conducted.
O
. . _ - - - . . . - -
.
, ..
GLR SLIDE #6
!O
'
VIOLATION 8805-02
Actions We Will Be Takino
,
A. Presettable latches will be provided by July 15, 1988. Keyed
'
removable tumblers will be provided by September 1,1988.
B. An electrically supervised monitor strike system will be installed by
December 31, 1988
, , ,
f
.
I
!
t
i
i
$ <
i
I
} ,
!
I
-
;
,
O. .
.
#
L
s
t
>
r r n-- , e m-r w+ve , .,w--w-~m-m- m e -w-w-~~ -,m~,.---w--ww.. -~r-wo-wwrs~*=m---w-
.
.., .-
GLR SLIDE #7
O VIOLATION 8805-02
Actions to Be Taken
A. Reduce the size of VHRA.
B. Revise the Radiation Protection Manual.
C. Conduct team building and communication skills training.
Results of Actions
l
All VHRA barriers are properly controlled.
l l l l l
. _
-. . . - - - - . ~
. _ -. . -- . . - _ . _ .
.. GLR SLIDE #8
VIOLATION 8805-03
:
Reasons for the Violation
A. Lack of management oversight to ensure technical specification
compliance.
B. Lack of a proceduralized key control system for VHRA keys.
!
Actions that Have Been Taken Results [
A. All VHRA barriers had special A. All VHRA's are controlled by ,
padlocks supplied, padlocks. t
!
B. General procedural compliance B. Key control compliance has been
is being stressed. completed.
' '
C. The management project team is C. Project organization has expedited i
developing improved key the process. l
i
control. !
t
D. Policy on HP padlocks and keys. D. Clear understanding by technicians
of key control requirements.
! , I l 'O l r
---
-+
v&m er -t'& py1*gp -- er Mg-pwg e ge y w-,m ene wyy9p..y-y79 %9p.py,
.
.., ..
GLR SLIDE #9
,-
L)
VIOLATION 8805-03
Actions that Will Be Taken
A. Presettable latches will be installed by July 15, 1988.
B. Controlled key tumblers will be installed by September 1,1988.
C. An improved key control program for the entire Station will be
implemented by December 31, 1988.
3
(d
' ,
Result of Actions
Management can now assure strong key control.
l l
.
- - - -- -- - ~~ - ' -- -"- --
1 ,_ _.u......._.. . . . . .
t
.. ... t
,
t
i
.
i
'
GLR SLIOE #10
,
VIOLATION 8805-04
i
;
1
Reason for the Violation . :
-
:
5
Individual forgot line-of-sight provision of new two-man rule for Very i
High Radiation Area entry.
!
Actions Taken Results -
A. Individual. was immediately A. Individual immediately returned to
{
reminded of new VHRA entry VHRA.
procedure. !
'
. j ,B. Individual's training on new B. Training completed.
procedurn reviewed. [
C. Individual prohibited from VHRA C. Individual does not perform VHRA escort.
escort duty.
i
;
i
D. Employee-Managem:nt procedural D. Procedural compliance with two-man
compliance conferencer rule exists. ,
conducted.
!
'
!
!
.
4
!
4 ,
O -
l
. _ ~ _ .,.__ _ ,,,_. . _ .__ _ . _.. , _ . .__ . _ . -. _ __ _ ._ _ __ _ _ _ - _ - , . -
.. .- . . , - .. _ _ _ _ _ . - . .__ . . _._. __ . _._-.
.. . - ,.
;
,
, ..
1
GLR SLIDE #11 i
:
l
i
i
,
VIOLATION 8805-04
- ,
l
l
Action to Be Taken l
! .l >
' Complete requalification of individual for VHRA ' escort.by $y 1.5, 1988. l . :
! 4
OPPD is currently in full. compliance because training systems in place
l assure no decertified HP is VHRA escort. l'
i
, , d
Result of Actions
- l ;
r
i
No unqualified health physics technician is performing VHRA escort duty. .
'
l
l
.
!
i l
'
l i
:
-
l
.
i i
I
, , . 1
I
l
I
'
;
e : i t ! ,
!
- i
1
j
!
.i I
1 I
':
1 w,-ww,w-w -- me -- ,-me,www, nm w-,mv e-w , ww er ',w- -v v . -- _
.
.. ..
.
g 6LR 5 LIDE #- IL
00
Yon e
runps wo-25
"
ben 24i >M
SPENT
REGENERhlfT
TM)K
: i No-/3 A
Am 23A .
4
;
^
wD-t+A
.
/'
:
2
O
Q
A
: Rm23
E/ev. 9 7/ '- o #
._
cifrAHtWAl#U
BC& WARY
ROPE y
i I l -.
> !
I v
l
1 L s
,
.
,: .-
GLR-SLIDE #13
'
O VIOLATION 8805-05
Reasons for the Violation
A. Inadequate methods used to. anchor rope supporting surface
contamination posting signs.
B. Inadequate procedure and training for posting and controlling surface
contamination areas.
C. Inadequ..a management oversight.
D. Inadequate communication with management,
j E. Inadequate HP shift turnover process. 4 ! t i i l
O
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _________ _ _ _ _ _ -_ __ _ ._-
*
I
.. . Tii.
-...
I
GLR SLIDE #14
is -
VIOLATION 8805-05
g
,
Actions Taken- Results
,.
.
.
A. Tape anchor replaced with- A. Posting no longer degraded.
!
stanchion.-
B. Use of duct tape for anchoring B. Duct tape not used to anchor rope
rope posting support phased posting support.
s out. !
C. Team building and communic:- C. Communication during HP shift
tions training initiated. turnover and to supervi:or improved, i
t
~
D. Plar.t Health Physicist or D. Plant Health Physicist new posting
,
designate review / approve new review / approval has prevented .
radiological postings during improper postings.
l -frequent RCA tours. l' i ! E , ;
I
l'
e . l l i i t l l $
- !
'O l
:
.
-
.y _ _. . _ . . . . . ..
. - -- _ - - _ _ . _ - _ _ _._ _ -
1
.. -i
, .*
;
GLR SLIDE #15
O VIOLATION 8805-05
'
-
l
a !
I
R
Actions to Be Taken' !
r
A. Procedure HP-9 will be revised by July 1,1988.
,
, ,
.
8. Group sessions will continue.
, l
:
i C. An informal HP shift turnover system will be implemented by April 1, i ! 1988. ! l ! D.. A formalized HP shift turnover system will be implemented by June 1, i
1988. !
'
i
O Results of Actions
:
1 f d
:
l Proper postings are being established, degraded radiological postings have
been corrected aiad communication between personnel and management is !,
- improved.
,
4
!
,
'
I , ! ! ! ! l ! I . ! ! !- !
- i
! : '
l
l
- O l
,
l
.
_ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ - - . _ . -f
f
.
,
#
GLR SLIOE #16
7-
! )
\~ / .
VIOLATION 8805-06
Reasons for the Violation
A. Lack of attention to detail
B. Lack of adequate management controls
Action that Will be Taken
A. OPPD is developing a Commitment Tracking System. A database
will be available by July 31, 1988.
(\
\ >
B. A technical review is being condteted.
C. Procedure upgrale program assures compliance with requirements.
'
h2sults of Actions
Attention to detail t,as significantly increased as has management
controls.
[^~~)
v
--
9
e., ,4
O
III. RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
!
O
l ' l
O
l . l l
- - - - - - - - ._ __ - - --
- _
!. o o o ~
...
l
!
RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT
l i
PROJECT
! l
PU RPOSE: TO IMPROVE RADIOLOGICAL
! ! PROTECTION FUNCTIONS ! OF OPPD , l
l
. . _ _ _ _ - . _ - _
. _ _ _ _ __. ._. __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_
>g '
~.* ,A.
"
i
.-
SLIOE #2~ i
j- .
.
!
4
- t
'
RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
'
TEAM MEMBERS ,
,
r
.
Section Manager - Technical Services R. L. Jaworski ;
!
3 Manager - Radiological Health & Emergency Planning F. F. FrancoL I
1
Supervisor - Radiological & Environmental Monitoring Services R. K. Stultz
i
Supervisor - Radiological Services C. W. Norris
Supervisor . Chemical & Radiation Protection G. L. Roach
,. l 1
- Plant Health Physicist A. D. Bilau ;
'
i
ALARA Coordinator J. M. Mattice i
i
'
! ! Radioactive Waste Coordinator C. R. Crawford i i t i ! j Senior Engineer M. W. Butt
T
i
:
1 i .
- i
- i
i ! '
i
f
,
()
.
I
'
i I i l i
>
-
! O O O . . l ' 1 1 l '
RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
l s
RESPONSIBILITIES '
! I i A. DETERMINE ROOT CAUSE OF PROBLEMS
:
1
j B. RESPOND TO NRC INSPECTION FINDINGS i i C. OVERSEE THE DEVELOPMENT AND j .
IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
'
i
l
'
;
- - . . . . _ -. .. .- _- __- _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
.
O O O 1. .
, ! ,
. RADIOLOGICAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PROCESS
l
l ! AUDIT CONCERNS
- INTERIM
. PROGRAM
'
PROJECT
UPGRADED
ACTION PROGRAM
CONSULTANT / INDUSTRY :
OM
EXPERIENCE
PROGRAM
ASSESSMENTS
I FIELD EXPERIENCE
INPUTS OUTPUTS : _-
9
',g P
.mme m em e e.eme - me e -ee
V I
I
I
E-*
I
I E--* I
@r I
I
z
W z
Z
wr
EC
I
C=a
e "4
C
C.D
E e LLJ CE I
g.g I LLJ g => c.D I
co CX O *-3 C1 O O
w I
A CX CX I
mA I E A A I
~
I E I
I
I
I ,
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
E E I I
*-* c
Z Z I
w CD I I
E-. o
Z Z I I
- A I I
I I
3 I
I Cl* w Z I
I C E-*
, I
I w '
3 z. .-* r $ ~
.O-.
g
D
CE A E-* I
I A CI C)
w w O w I
I C=1 gn A cn I
I I
I I
, l
E-* 3
~ -
c> *-* c
'O *
I I
y E- .- --- . .---- I
E-* CC
h
m
en CD
o
c,,) X C4
" % %J &
w
E
w
D
C
CX
I h E-*
= <>w
I E-* *3 l
Cn L1J cn Z M Q
cn E-* O ZZ W3 C
= = CX
O
,_. E-* = = .-. a ae ,_. Cze
- CX c._) LLJ c *-* Z Cn g
g LLJ D E - . 3E-* LAJ*-*
E-* 3 C) A cn 1 3C Ac a
O = = cn A LLJCZ y
c e o L1J CM g
c>
o w r C.J LLJ CnA ,_,
t) en O XA Z% q
cn CJ L1J Q *-* c q
e . . . .
O
.
._ _ _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
_ - _ . . . _ . __ _ _ _ . _ . _ , - - - _ _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . . _ . - _ _ . .
I
.. ,
..., ..
.
SLIDE #6 ,.
>
-
!
!
!
- RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ASSESSMENT SUMARY ,
-,
-
i
E PURPOSE
ASSESSOR STATUS
!
Compliance Assessment- Identify Areas needing up- Chemston Started I
j grade to meet NRC standards 2/15/88 t
- and industry practices Completed [
.
3/17/88 i
)
i !
,
- Excellence in Operations Identify Improvements to OPPD Started
l
.
j
Meet INPO Guidelines 1/15/88 !
j
j
L
Completed
j 3
3/19/88 -
,
, ..
>
c i
!
- , Independent Appraisal Evaluate all aspects of Stone and Started
' {
of Nuclear Functions OPPD's Nuclear Operation Webster 12/15/87 [
j Completed
by 6/1/88
f
j
,
!
- !
! ! l I
- :
. : i !
- i
I
'
l
!' !
!
!
l l l l
i
l . { * 1 t i
,
[
[
,
m,r,e,w.<,,----,,w - . . - , , , , , _ - . ..~-,-_m.,,___-----,,,-------.m.-..-._,,-
I
.
,
~
! l
O O O ..
l l l ' i i . 1 l i , ' , , i i i t
t
H.P./M ANAGEMENT
I
!
COWUNICTATION CONFERENCE ,
,
i
>
- i
I
l
!
l
.1 i
' i l
1 :
1
I .
i !
.
!
1
_ . ____ __ _ . _ _ - - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___._ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ __ _.
, !
O O O i>
! l l METHOD I ! ! ) l 1. QUES IIONAIRE ! l 2. HP TECH MEETING i I '
3. MANAGEMENT \AEETING
4. HP TECH /MNGMNT
COMMUNICATION
1 CONFERENCE l !
l
1 _-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - . _ _ . . _ . _ . - _ -
_
_
..
IMMEDIATE RESULTS
!
1. INFORV ATION WAS GATHERED
.
.
2. COWUNICATION ENHANCED
t
,
, .? ,a .
--
_
O O O ~[.
FURTHER ACTIONS
1. CONTINUED ENCOURAGEVENT OF
COk Y1UNICATIONS
2. CONTINUATION OF HP TECi/V ANAGEVIENT
CONFERENCE CONCEPT
3. l\APLEVENT HPES L. TEAM BUILDING TRAINING 5. CONTINUED SENIOR MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT 6. LEADEPiSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TRAINING
'
' " ' " ~
o
.
'
<
..
,
O
IV. ASSESSMENTS /F*NDINGS SUMMARY
!
- O
i !
O
1 1
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ . . -
,
! O O O ~!
;.
l
) RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION i IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ;
l HEALTH PHYSICS FUNCTIONS ! : . 4
1. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION !
;
2. TRAINING
3. DOSE MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL
4. RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL CONTROLS
3 1
5. INTERNAL MEASUREMENTS AND CONTROL
f
6. AIR SAMPLING PROGRAM !
7. WORK PRACTICES AND EXPOSURE CONTROL
'
8. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
I 9. INSTRUMENTATION i i
- a-. - _ _ - . _ - . -. ._ _ - . _ _ _ . _ - _ . . . -- - - _ _ _ . - _. -_ - __ _ - . - - .
:
. _ _ - - - . - ..
.
~
; O O O ..
!
RADIATION PROTECTION l\/IPROVEMENT
COMPLIANGE ASSES _S\/IENT
'
l
l SUV UARY: ! !
GOOD PERFORV ANCE
l INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITIES l OF PERSONNEL ! VINIMAL NUMBER OF ! V AINTENANCE PROBLEVS ' i l LOW DOSE RATES ACHIEVED BY HIGH
_ITHlUV C-iEMISTRY
'
l l l
.. - -
_ __- - _ --
o o o ~i.
RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT
Sutt1ARY REPORT
NUMBER OF IDENTIFIED
FUNCTION IMPROVEMENT TASKS
1. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 11
2. TRAINING 7
3. DOSE MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL 8
4. RADI0 ACTIVE MATERIAL CONTROLS 6
5. INTERNAL MEASUREMENTS AND CONTROL 10
6. AIR SAMPLING PROGRAM ?
7. WORK PRACTICES AND EXPOSURE CONTROL 8
8. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION 16
9. INSTRUMENTATION (STILL IN PROGRESS)
EXCELLENCE IN
CPERATIONS
SELF ASSESSMENT
lDENTIFY AREAS REQUIRING
IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOP
PROGRAMS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
_ _ _ _ . .. _ -
--. _ .__- . _ __ _ __ _ - -- -
_- _ . _ _ __._ --__ .- - - _ . _ _ - . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _._ __ __ ._ _
4 RADIATION PROTECTION j SELF ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
NUMBER OF IDENTIFIED
- FUNCTION IMPROVEMENT TASKS -
I 1. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION 15
2. PERSONNEL KNOWLEDGE AND PERFORMANCE 5
l 3. GENERAL EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY IN 8 .
RADIATION PROTECTION
!
4. EXTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE 9
l l
5. INTERNAL RADIATION EXPOSURE 5
'
6.RADIOLOGICALPROTECTIONINSTRUMENTATIONANDEQUIPMENT 2
7. SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE 12
l 8. PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY 7
- 9. RADI0 ACTIVE CONTAMINATION CONTROL 5
10. CORPORATE RADIOLOGICAL PROYECTION 9
,
. . - - . _ . . - . . .- . . . . . . - -. . - . _ _ _- _ . - -
, ,
-
,
p's1 !
!'
.
<
l
) !
[
n([[) !
i
j.-
!
o
- _
INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL OF NUCLEAR FUNCTIONS i
i
by
2
l
STONE AND WEBSTER l
!
.
I
i
PURPOSE: To evaluate all aspects of OPPD's Nuclear Operation :
l
I
,
e i
(
SCOPE: Includes health Physics as one of 17 functional areas :
-
appraised
i
i
i
* f
METHOD: Interviews, field observation and discussion with
- () j
management and Health Physics personnel
!
I
I
4 ~ i * 5
Inspection and review of procedures '
-
l -- ! i
'
l Evaluation of resources l f
1
'
' i
! Review administration and organization L
i
! ! ! I i
l
RESULTS: To be reported to W. C. Jones by June 1, 1988
jl
>
t
!
!
,
6
I I 5
:
I
' , . .
}
:
I
4
I I
3
a -- +- b A
.
O
V. RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PLAN
:
f
O
l
,
, O
-. ._- . _- _ ..
- - - - - _ - - - _ .
._ _ . _ _ - . _ -
,
ACT ON CORRECT
'
INTERIM UPGRADED
AUDIT EXISTING
-
PROGRAM PROGRAM
,
CONCERNS PROGRAMS
-
(.__ -__-__-----___--------- ----
q
I I
'
( DEVELOP IMPLEMENT I
CONDUCT
1 l
PLAN
- '
PLAN I
l
ASSESSMENTS I I
' I I
COMPLIANCE
I REWRITE I
i EXCELL IN !- RPM i
0PERATIONS
l POLICY IMPROVEMENT l
INDEPENDENT I SECTION PROGRAM l
'
APPRAISAL
L_________-__ .-----________--- J i
:
RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
1
_ _ _ _ _ , - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _
,c ad k
4
D
\' m
4
w
D=*
g>* :>* m
1 .-3 .-3
w w c2
0-* CE)
U 6-* C33 !
a e *-*
w e CD 2.CD
Ca -*
LA=
r
.
g33
.
*-*
E
-
G3
-
*- * Da
De
X g-g *"* b
o W sn C3 C3M
gg w A CC W Zw
*
m
%
& k
a
"&a
% %
w <
r
Z B* ~
a en el +
4 c
% H
Z 2
H W
z
LaJ
r a. 0.-.
1 aJ =a e
E D w - C3 Z g9-* w
a.aJ CD
D M G
cs
S'~*5
m-* ,
M A m
- - . .e aw
*=*t-*
*-* CD CC ~
m J C53 wcn
q
2 U N g% $
o -- CC er
.- e .m.w %.a w
E==4 D I
y e- e to
i LaJ "W
*-*
E""* cc .D.*-*
C3 *-* tr> LJ sn ;
M c7 6-*
* O
+-*
A L&-
cp CC CY
e
r
J
a Z Z
O
*$
.
u
-
C3
- "w
:s
$
w
5 C.D
o
D'=e
a
Cs
a:
X H
m d
1 I CJ C zc3 *e
"*
i
i
O * 3 1 a tm *w
t;.-*
t
- u- = . .- o ;
a
G
- ==
C4
=
C3
-. =
W
~
mCC
,
E==4 gg w U
AC 2
w
g e
cs3
p w-e
5 <
m
ca
' . gg
.a
-e
C
z'n C4
w y
U
=.* A
CD
v z.
.-.
e . i
LA3 l W
i % % (
CD X o e
U U r
CA CO
2 2 >
a .-1 a 1
!
.-3 a .-3 a
A Z m A z gn
C3 = C3
,
*-3
a m "
5-* A. h *- I
a e *-*h
5-e
.
t
*
i 5-* t) Z " F-* U
4 C3 Z Q 2" l
l e- :s e-* ::a !-
-
_
u _
64.
W CN3
j w w i
i
i
'
!
!
j t
i
a p
I l
, , - _ - - - . - . . _ - . _ _ . - ,y ..--,,______,_-___..~,,~.---_.-_.___-__~,-___m. -
_ - - , .
o o o j
] l RADIOLOGICAL IVPROVEViENT ! PLAN ! V AJOR CO VPONENTS ! ~!. A NEW RADIATION PROTECTION V ANUAL l WITH A POLICY / PLAN AND SIMPLE, CLEAR
IVPLEVENTING PROCEDURES
I 2. NEW INSTRUVENTS AND EQUIP \/IENT
IN SERVICE
3. A STAl=F REORGANIZATION
INCLUDING TRAINING
4. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED DURING
P_AN DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW STAGES
- - - - - - - -
}}