ML20151B271

Summary of 880620 Meeting W/Util Proposed Restart Technical Verification Program for Plant & Safety Sys Functional Insp Currenty Being Conducted at Site.Viewgraphs,List of Attendees & Insp Plan Encl

ML20151B271
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	07/12/1988
From:	Gears G NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:	NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
Shared Package
ML20151B274	List: ML20151B271 ML20151B287
References
NUDOCS 8807200309
Download: ML20151B271 (21)

Text

.-

l y

,,r, e stav

/

UNITED STATES o

~g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

h Y

WASHING TON, D. C. 20665

\\*****/

July 12, 1988 Docket Nos. 50-259/260/296 LICENSEE:

Tennessee Valley Authority FACILITY:

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF JUNE 20, 1988 MEETING WITH THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY On June 20, 1988, members of the Office of Special Projects met with representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA or the licensee).

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss TVA's proposed restart technical verification program for Browns Ferry and, specifically, the Safety System Functional Inspection (SSFI) currently being conducted by TVA at Browns Ferry. is s list of attendees.

The slides used by TVA in its discussion are contained in Enclosure 2.

The primary focus of the staff's attention involved questions about the SSFI as described in Special Inspection Number BFA88811 (Enclosure 3).

The staff specifically asked the licensee to address the following areas:

1.

Independence of team members 2.

Sample expansion criteria 3.

Design interfaces 4

Team interactions 5.

TVA overview and NRC oversight 6.

Reports /auditable products 7.

Readiness of selected systems for audit The following is the staff's sumary of the licensee's response to these concerns:

l 1.

Independence - TVA has committed to address this issue; specifically, TVA will determine if any team member has had previous input or decision making authority on the selected systems.

2.,

Exptsion criteria - TVA will provide the staff with a more detailed deu.1ption of the manner and methods to determine when and how audit efforts will be intensified in areas of potential weaknesses.

\\

l l

3.

Design interfaces - The staff's review of the Special Inspection Plan l

(Enclosure 3) provided sufficient information to satisfy the staff that l

design interfaces will be considored as part of the licensee's SSFI.

. [

l hV l

8807200309 080712 PDR ADOCK 00000259 O

PNU

\\

i

... +

. 4.

Team interactions - The staff discussed the interaction and reporting requirements of the SSFI team. The licensee's response and the SSFI Special Inspection Plan answered the staff's questions in this area.

5.

Overview - The staff requested information concerning what TVA controls / overview will be in place. The licensee indicated that tile Nuclear Quality Audit and Evaluation Branch will perform the audit with contractor assistance.

The Director, Nuclear Quality Assurance, has overall responsibility for the SSFI inspection.

The staff indicated that, as part of its overview function, the Residents would be assigned to follow the SSFI onsite activities and would require the draft summary report of the team for its own review.

6.

Reports - The licensee indicated that there would be a draft sumary report prepared by the SSFI team and provided to the SSFI Task Manager.

The Task Manager would review, comment and finalize the sumary report in coordination with the SSFI team members. The draft sumary report would receive no further review outside the SSFI chain.

7.

Readiness of sele.ted systems - The staff questioned the licensee about the overall readiness of the selected systems for the intended scope of the audit as described in the SSFI Plan for Browns Ferry (Enclosure 3).

The staff suggested that it may be necessary to follow-up on operational and surveillance / testing aspects at a later date.

The meeting on SSFI was concluded with the staff indicating that it was satisfied with the overall scope and proposed conduct of the program.

However, the licensee still needs to satisfactorily address the questions outlined above.

Fin 611y the staff stated that it would hold the option of performing its own review at any time prior to restart.

As a follow-up to the meeting on SSFI, the licensee and staff discussed the p(roposed Browns Ferry, Unit 2, schedule for completion of TMI Action, II Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation). provides a copy of the TVA slides used in its presentation.

By letter dated March 1, 1988, TVA requested that NRC pernit it to complete the necessary II.F.2 modifications on Unit 2 during the next refueling outage. TVA's information supporting this request was sumarized during this meeting. Technical discussions were held to determine the adequacy of TVA's proposed compensatory fixes (including both aardware and procedural modifications). The staff concluded that the licensee had provided sufficient

\\

i

.a.

u.

I l

i l...(

' technical information during this meeting for it to reconsider the implementation schedule for II.F.2.

The staff indicated that it would provide a response to the licensee's March 1, 1988 letter no later than July 29, 1988.

In order to expedite this review, the staff requested that the licensee provide a copy of all procedures covering potential water level mismatch errors.

/ Gerald E. Gears Pro ect Manager UVA Projects Dih, s4c'n Office of Special Projects

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

TVA Slides Used In Presentation 3.

SSFI Plan (BFA88811, June 10, 1968) 4.

TVA Slides On Reactor Water Level Issues cc w/ enclosures:

See next page

\\

r

-n

~m y

,--mn

.,?

,.... i..

. y,.

.g:(,.:..,.;

e-J DISTRIBUTION FOR MEETING

SUMMARY

DATED: July 12, 1988 Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3*

Docket File NRC PDR Local PDR Projects Reading J. Partlow J. Axelrad S. Richardson S. Black B. D. Liaw G. Gears D. Moran J. Kelly M. Sinans F. McCoy J. Rutberg W. S. Little R. Pierson ACRS (10)

GPA/PA GPA/CA (M. Callahan) (5)***

F. Miraglia E. Jordan P. Gwynn J. Scarborough T. Elsasser C. Ader TVA-Rockville BFN Rdg. File

• cc:

Licensee / Applicant & Service List i

l

\\

r

,o

technical information during this meeting for it to reconsider the

~

implementation schedule for II.F.2.

The staff indicated that it would provide a response to the licensee' March 1, 1988 letter no later than July 29, 1988, In order to expedite this review, the staff requested'that the licensee provide a copy of all procedures as covering potential water level mismatch errors.

Original Signed by Gerald E. Gears, Project Manager TVA Projects Division Office of Special Projacts

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

TVA Slides Used In Presentation' 3.

SSFI Plan.(BFA88811, June 10, 1988) 4.

TVA Slides On Roactor Water Level Issues cc w/ enclosures:

See next page Distribution Docket Eile2 NRC"PDR ~~

Local PDR Those On Attached List s

./

A/PM D/TP TV.

OSP:TVA/LA 0

MSims G

f' M B iaw SBlack 7/ /88 g

88 7/t'kf88 7/;g/88

, q.

.,. :.... y.. :.. s....:....:: a:.a: '.:,_

.c., ; f,

, a:

l i

ENCLOSURE 1 ATTENDANCE LIST-SSFI MEETING JUNE 20, 1988 Name Organization Gerry Gcars NRC/OSP Suzanne Black NRC/OSP Jim Partlow NRC/OSP Tom Burdette TVA Robert W. Cantrell TVA Bob Pierson NRC/OSP B. D. Liaw NRC/OSF J. P. Stapleton Advisor Hugo Pomprehn TVA/BFN/S. Director Nicholas C. Kazonas TVA/DNQA Bill Little NRC/OSP/ Region II f

9 l

\\

i

~

1 8

9 e

f BROWNS FERRY RESTART TECHNICAL VERIFICATION 4

l l

i i

I l

j

.-i l1 5

TVA OBJECTIVES j

f.

1 1

SAFE AND RELIABLE PLANT i

(

I

)..

r-i U

j NPP COMMITh4ENTS ACHIEVED E

)

i 1988 RESTART i

t I

y:

I l

AGREE ON VERIFICATION ACTIONS NEEDED FOR RESTART 4

l l

l a

.E i t

-1 l

i e

~

k BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 RESTART

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE 1987 1988 ON DlJ F

M A

M J

J A

S O

N D

M AJ PGMS TO F4HC t4 R C P G M A P P H OVA L 74 HC INSP ECTION S N RC APPROWL S

. SEISMIC

. WELD POM LICENSING

.rePeNDix n

.ea are n

. A M PACI T Y

.B AS E L I N E

.gg

~'*'

ONGOING PGMS COMPLEIE WA L M OOW N S A t4 0 TECHNICAL PGMS 8^8EttNE 66%

DNE PROGRAMS

.o ou,t

. SEISMIC 4 3% COMPL ENGINE E RING CU TOF F I9b5)

RELE ASE ECNs V

CLOSURE OF MINOR ECNs TO'QO ECQ(

{NM DNE PRODUC 648 ECNs COMPL

. APP H 80%

~

' REAk)??ShS',Ns\\s (1600 ON E 90% COMPLETE INSTALL MODS V MINOR WK & C/O I,$,Q,E MODIFICATIONS 28 ECN. COuPt FT P

)

s INSTALL CONDE N SE R EXAM

,, ' f,3'$fh;h![bfb's')

k f

s

-HEQUAL Ct ASS - COMPL 14MAH88

.NEW LICENSE CL ASS V

P E R AT RS RE U ALIFIE M AINT E N AN EIMPR VEMENT - 61 % COMPL O & M PUNT

=

.T R AltelN G ACCREDITATION-IN PO OPER ATOft READIN ESS Cl.OSE BK F 6to2 e/1 FUEL

/30

~ ~~~

LOP /LOCA V V LOAD V

19% PROCEDURES COMPL

~ " ~ ~

~'

RESTART TEST

.38 % reSr COMel.

s

BFN PROGRAMS I

. CONFIGURATION CONTROL i'

REGULATORY PROGRAMS SElSMIC PROGRAMS SELECTED ISSUES ameg 4

CONE!GUHAT!ON_C_ONTBOL 1

1 i

DbVP i

I 1

1 1

1 i

~

RESTART TEST PROGRAM I

i I

i f.

6 6

I i

i l

t 1

i

,t '

^-

L i

i s;

I Il. E.G U L A. _T._O ll. Y._ _.Pl1_0. G R. A M. _ _S..

.~

• i EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION l

r i

i

~.,

.,l

-l i

APPENDIX H i,

,i

's.

{

l I.

t'

s. <

3 1

4

?-

l i

r I

I

.r.

k o'

i

".i l

\\

t

r..

.e s

V l

S..... _E.I S. M...- I.C.--. I. S.. S.. U E. S j

i I

t j

t' i

E 5

SUSPENDED SYSTEMS i

i 1

u I

l 1

1 i

BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1

i L-

i r

e s

.N i

~~1' 1

i l

.i i

T.

1 4

1

+

P t.I i

-l 1

.r I

3 l

l SELECTEDISSUES i

e.

Y, I

i

~

I ii INTERNAL & EXTERNAL REVIEWS p

't i

t.

NRC FINDING 0 i

INDUSTRY ISSUES 3

i l

EMPLOYEE CONCERNS n

l

?

1, i

n f.

'd 6

t

' ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE OF PROGRAM ADEQUACY i

a:

l: ;'

1

)

1 l

- SYSIEMAllC lll. VIEW 01 DI N I'llOGilAMS CONDUCTED

\\

i v.

4 l

l

- SON I ESSONS 1.EAllNiill EVALUAIED l

F i

I

- NilC IliEVIEWS

.y'

~,

9 l

- SON till C(IMI'I.E I'E 5-l e

1:

i

iu L..;.

2.

u..-u....

u.

6 M

z Ww

-b C!

,Z, M

}

.N"'

i e

i l'

w i

1 N:

i i

on C.

E.

fJ-n i

?

I pm Vy eau.

l 2.

['

i l

IM I

g I

pm i

m m.

5 i

A l

C a

ZJ une l

i C

i

-W Z

I i

~

9 l

i w

i l

m "9

g n

i

-2 l

1 W

.-e 2.

l I

A m

t W

l f1 i

a=.

14-I.

l w

i i

a i

\\\\

e l

.c

.I

~;

q VERIFICATION PROGRAM _FOR RESTART i

I SAFETY SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL INSPECTION (SSFI) l-j i; !

j TVAs QA ORGANIZATION IMPLEMENTS i

4.-

i l

EXPERIENCED OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR ASSISTS l

l NHC PROVIDES OVERSIGHT S

ONE SAFETY SYSTEM SELECTED l

_ 4.

l ESTABLISHES AN ONGOING PROGRAM AT TVA i

i t.

5

)

A 4

y g

g e

a a e

>4' t

t 0

'/)

WDC 2l'.'

O U.J CZ O

5 O2 y

c, O

2 5

mx e at, u.;

VJ 3

M 6

C z

h s.

m v

[

,me a

t..

A m

=

y8 i M

0 '

N i

i

-w v

b,i C

, s' C

5 z

-r Z

C.

n C'

'a"

c Z

Z L.

c

=*'

=

7' Z'

b

~

o.<

7.=.e 7

.d b,.t v #.

e.

ee t

w auss'

[""*

g:

2.

e%

w w

1 e.y e.,

one i

8"'

U.J Z

U

=

=

m E

E

~

L m

w w

m f%

9 %

W

%d O'

\\

i.*

N

)

6

=

m

%d 2

r.

M:~

r 1

L, e

a a

e

-... - _ _-.. -,, _,.. _ - _ _. _. - - - -. _ - - _,, _... _. - - -..,, ~ ~.. - - -.... _ - -. _. -, _. -.... ~. _ - _ _..,

OlilECT00, NtICI EAR OtJAt_lfY ASST JRANCF N. KAZAL'IAS k

IWN SSFI I ASK MANAGER I.

E. 13tillDE l li: (IVA)

-p ni n SSFi ASSISTANT (INIFHIACE)

TASK MANAGER i.

SIII I ICINSirn

"^Y W. CONLEY (TVA)

MtC lHilalACI

- pg.gpggg j (Techiclogy Transfer)

SSFI IEN1 (IRCI) nx DelBA)10NAt I$I I <I*0}

Ef tCI atAnintss IfAn LEADIR Proposed I

Oe.;hr. ology Transfer) ssri itAn ntui EHGH (18C1)

Mf0lt INCR (IVA)

Ette tema (tuci) litC INCR (IVA) k I

ncini/ nous (inct) nAin /nres (rvA) ncni sysitns (ince) non! SYsiftts (IVA) oristA1. sons (ivA>

c I/C flER (IVA) 6 f^

e

O U R.. _CO_ _N.C LUSIO_NS l

l

\\

BFN RESTART PROGRAMS IMPLEMENT NRC COMMITMENTS SSFi BY TVA/QA WITH NRC OVERSIGHT IS:

1, i

APPROPHIATE EFFECTIVE j

1 l

NHCs DECISION IS NEEDED i

i

. a:;

a t

a.. -

'.. ~

J J

.)

)

g.

C __ O m

S S6g en Y-m n

6/

6

^SDec:o, 1

June 1988 1

i

\\

)

1

..e.-,

n,..,

--,,,.. =.,,. _,, -.

-,--,,.- ~-

,,n--.

,,-------,,,--,,,-,,,w.,,-

,..n,,,,m-ee,,,_,m,,

,,,,-wa,_-,

.