ML20150E459

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Ofc Concurrence on Encl Rule Re Diagnostic Misadministration Repts
ML20150E459
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/05/1988
From: Mcelroy N
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Lesar M, Rich Smith
NRC, NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
Shared Package
ML20150E436 List:
References
FRN-53FR21627, RULE-PR-35 AC69-2-7, NUDOCS 8807150151
Download: ML20150E459 (1)


Text

_. .

M-1 POR ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP 5FEB88 TO: RON SMITH, OGC MIKE LESAR, ARM "PLEASE PROVIDE OFFICE CONCURRENCE ON THE ENCLOSED RULE REGARDING DIAGNOSTIC MISADMINISTRATION REPORTS" l

l N. L. MCELROY, NMSS 23417 l

878004 00CKETED USHRC RULESORR:ADM

& PROCEDURES BR 88 RB -5 P 3:25 ,

~

fg71lg151 880629 35 53FR21627 PDR

_____._.______.__.__._..__..___.______..________J

A%9.$

-.- .s PDR i l

MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations FROM: Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

SUBJECT:

DIAGNOSTIC MISADMINISTRATION REPORT FORM This is to request your approval of a minor rulemaking to require that medical uso licensees submit diagnostic inisadministration reports on a special form.

When it approved the revision of 10 CFR Part 35, the Comission directed that the form be developed. The revised rule was sublished without the form number. The Office of Management and Budget 1as approved the form, an NRC form number has been assigned, and the form has been printed. This rulemaking will require that licensees use the form. , , ,

The Office of Administration concurs in this action and the Office of the General Counsel has no legal objection.

Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Directc.-

i Office of Nuclear Material Saf>!ty l and Safeguards l-l DISTRIBUTION:

i NRC File Center VLM111er INNS Central File GSjoblom NHSS r/f RECunningham IMAB r/f SATreby, OGC l NLHcElroy PGNorry, ARM JFunches I

a .

7p

i

[7590-01]

AlfoT-2 PDR NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMilSSION 10 CFR Part 35 Diagnostic Misadministration Report Form AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations for the medical use of byproduct material to indicate the form to be used for reporting diagnostic misadministrations. This action is intended to inform the public of the development and avail-ability of the form that medical iicensees must use to meet this report-ing requirement.

EFFECTIVE DATE: (upon publication in the FR)

ADDRESSES: A copy of Form NRC 473 may be examined at the Commission's Public Document Room at 1717 H Street NW., Washington, DC. Single copies are available from Norman L. McElroy, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Telephone: (301)492-3417.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman L. McElroy, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Telephone: (301)492-3417.

1

^

[7590-01]

AClA-9 POR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The NRC amended its regulations for the medical use of byproduct material to require licensees to report certain diagnostic misadmin-istrations to the NRC on a special NRC form. This matter was discussed in the final rule revising 10 CFR Part 35 (51 FR 36932, October 16, 1986).

The NRC staff has developed the form, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved its use. The NRC is amending its regula-tions to insert the form number in the regulatory text. A copy of the form will be mailed to NRC medical use licensees.

Because these are amendments dealing with agency practice and

~

procedures, the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act do not apply pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 533(b)(A). The amend-ments are effective upon publication in the Federal Register. Good cause exists to dispense with the usual 30-day delay in the effective date because the amendments are of a minor and administrative nature dealing with the identification of the form to be used in meeting a previously approved reporting requirement.

Administrative Statements Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion

~

The NRC has determined that this regulation is the type of action described in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22(c)(3) and (c)(14).

Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environ-mental. assessment has been prepared.

2

[7590-01]

e ANT 4 POR Paperwork Reduction Act Statement l

This final rule amends information collection requirements that are I subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), i These requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Number 3150-0140.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 10 CFR PART 35

%,\ '%s Byproduct material, Drugs, Health devices, Health professions, Incorporation by reference, Medical devices, Nuclear materials, Occupa-tional safety and health, Penalty, Radiation protection, Reporting and ~

recordkeeping requirements.

REGULATORY TEXT Under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 553 the NRC is adopting the following amendments to 10 CFR Part 35.

, PART 35--MEDICAL USE OF BYPRODUCT MATERIAL

, 1. The authority cita- i for Part 35 continues to read as follows:

AUTHORITY: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201);

sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5841).

3

~

[7590-01]

Ac (,91 PDR S 35.33 [ Amended]

2. In 6 35.33, paragraph (c) is amended by removing footnote 1 and by inserting "Form NRC 473" in place of "Form NRC " in the second sentence.

Dated at Bethesda, MD, this day of , 1988.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Victor J. Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations. ._

l I~

l l

l l

4

.. . .- - . . . - - - - - - - - ~ _ - - -

= +> . AOo9-T 0AILY STAFF NOTES OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS On , 1908, the Executive Director for Operations approved a final rule that amends 10 CFR Part 35, "Medical Use of Byproduct Matarial." to require that diagnostic misadministrations be reported on NRC Form 473. This requirement was approved by the Commission in the final revision of 10 CFR Part 35. However, when the revision was published, neither Office of Management and Budget (OM8) approval nor the NRC form number had been obtained. OMB approval and -

design of the form are now complete and the requirement to use the form can now be imposed. A copy of the rulemaking and the form will be mailed to affected licensees.

This constitutes notice to the Commission that, in accordance, with the rulemaking authority delegated to the EDO, the EDO has received this final rule and proposes to forward it on to the Office of the Secretary for FR publication, unless otherwise directed by the Commission.

l l

l l

l

f'

.\ kW4 Pog NRCMORM 4M U S. NUCLE AR RE GULATOQY COMMI55 TON 4471 twowo t,y OWg 10 CFQ s35 33 3:5o at so DIAGNOSTIC MISADMINISTRATION REPORT (N U LICENSEE NAME l iN21 LICENSE NUM8E R tNeiSTATE IiHIIIIHI eN51 E' TENT OATE IN61 REPORT DATE

'N:4 cst Y MQsu t H DAv TEA" MQNTH DAY TEAR

_l l l l l f I I (N8) Ds0 THE MISADMINISTR ATION INv0LVE AN IN9 NUMSE R OF PATIENTS WMQ RECFIVED IN7) TYPE OF Mi$ ADMINISTRATION A MIS ADMINisTR ATiON UNDER TMS htPOR T ISOTOPE OF SODINE 1011 WRONG 1021 DOS AGE DiF F ER6NG

_ R ADIOPHAR MACE UTICAl. _ FROM PRESCRIBEQ 8 7 53

  1. 03) WRONG P A f tE NT fodb WRONG ROUTEP l I9991 Y ES l l filH NO (N10l ENTE NOED IN10Al INT E NDE D INI11GivFN CHE CAL

~

46l NO CLINICA L PROCEDUR E

~

1081 ULTR ASOUND STUDY We LUCURIES ISOTOPE "$M F $7UDY MILLICURit$ l$0 TOPE po STUOY (MI NUCLEAR M70tCINE (09t CT 8700Y

_ s _

$7UDYl (Comole'ED I W (10l NM't STUDY

[ _

107) x R AY $7UOY (111 OTHE R; (N121 PRECIPITATOR

(??) RE F ERRING PHY$iCI AN 176) MOT LAS TECHNOLOGIST 172) W ARD NUR$E (7761MAGING TECHNOLOGIST (73) W ARO CLERK (781 CUNic R ECEPT'ONi$7 i74) NUCLE AR PHARMACY 1791 SCHE DUUNG TECHNOLOGasT

~

NAME OF NUCLEAR P@1%MACY, 1809 PATIENT l CI'Y l$7 ATE 1811 OTHE R (N133 ERROR HOT LAS RE F ERR AL A DMrNIST R A TION O'54t R (lH MISLASELEO A SYRINGE (IS) . ELECTED WRONG VIAL (201 MiSUNOER$TOOD f 301 SE LECTE D WRONG (401 spec,ty

- WHEN ORAWING DO$ AGE REF E RRING PH YSICI AN $ PAftENT st21 MsSLAEELEO A VI AL REQUEST OR VIAL SHIELO (ISI SET DOSE CAUSRATOR (3H A WE RE D W AsMG (211 R EOuE STE D WRONG OOM P AGE INTENDED IMPROPE R LY -

$TUOY F OR 'sTHER P ATIENT (13) RECONSTITUTE D (17) MisRE A0 OOSE _

. WRONG PE AGENT Kti _ CA U SR A TOR _

(18) MISUNOERSTOOO (72) REOUE STED S TUDY (3218 AOUGHT WRONG

_ R ADIOPH ARM ACEUTICAL FOR WRONG PATIENT ._ PATIENT TO CLINIC 114) PLACE D RECONSTITUTE D OR DOSAGE ORDER 133) SE LECTE D WRONG VI AL IN WRONG $ Hit LD -

SYRINGE FROM DOSAGE I CART l

(N14) CONTRIBUTING F ACTORS IN'51 ACTION T AKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE (80s $TUDENT TECH'rOLOGesi t85) REQUlstTION kOT CHECKED sVPLEMENT N8W PROCE DURES FCq l IC6):MPRuv E SUPE RVs540N t

I - - J OF PEF 50NNEL (9 t) NEW EssPLOYE E 186) PATIENT CHART NOT (CH VERIFICATION OF REOUEST CHECKED -

(C2p R ADeOPHARM ACEUTICAL (821 FOREIGN LANI UAGg IC71 NO ACTION j _., LP.8ELING ANO MANDLING _

I (83) PaTIE NT INCOHE R E NT OR 48 7) NEW PROCEDUR E IC3) VERIFICATION OF PATIENT IC8IOTHER

- UNCONSClOUS - -

IDE NTIF IC A TION -

188) HE AvY WORK LO AD (84) 10 SR ACEL ET NOT CHECKED (C4) R E'N$f RUCT PE RSONNE L

,C.,REPR~.~o ,ER,eN m (Ntet E F F ECT ON PATIENTS SEE A95TR ACT l l NONE APPARENT int FI A85TR ACT fit mort aPaes a mFuwed. erfere edersonaf sAseraj

~

1 3

NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMIS$lON USE iNiti IN i 9i iN2on RE GiON AL LOG (N2 U *CCES5 SON NUMSE R (N77) ;NITI A L S AS NUM8 E R i (M91%E$

i _