ML20150E274
| ML20150E274 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1986 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150E272 | List:
|
| References | |
| TASMAP-7, NUDOCS 8803300355 | |
| Download: ML20150E274 (262) | |
Text
, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __
2 TASMAP-7 1ssue 3 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 9
. ) SerVICO* PUBLic bERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: FORT ST. VRAIN WORK REVIEW COMMITTEE GUIDELINES d6 "2E 3
ISSUANCE
, I b -~'
M N ~
\ -
O?YfMt
. ,Nwl PORC EFFECTIVE REVIEW EORC S 5 4 JAN 3- 1986 oATE l S Io 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides administrative guidelines for the organization and activities associated with the Fort St. Vrain Work Review Committee (WRC).
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure is applicable to all reviews performed by the WRC concerning Fort St. Vrain modification activities.
3.0 GlNERAL 3.1 Plant Management has the overall responsibility for the Nuclear Production approval of Fort St. Vrain modification activities.
3.2 The Work Review Committee is responsible for reviewing proposed plant modification activities and making subsequent recommendations to Plant Management concerning their approval.
FORT ST. VRAIN NON CONTROLLED COPY VERIFY isggg a status wtTH DOCUMENT CENTER PRloR To ust aoau anime, 8803300355 880318 PDR ADOCK 05000267 O DCD Fonvic4 372 :2 3642
TASMAP-7 Issue 3 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 2 of 9 SerVlCO'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO I 3.3 The Te:nnical Services Engineering Department will I ::crcinate WRC a::ivities. Tne WRC will be ::mposed of representatives from :ne following cepar ments as re:uire::
I a) Te:hnical Services Engineering (cocedinator)*
b) NED
- ) Ooera-ions
- d) Maintenance (Me:nanical and Ele: rical) e) Health Physics" f) 5:neculing l g) Results" h) Training" i) CA j) Other l NOTE: Ine ce ar:ments note: witn an asterisk (*) must be l re:resente: in all WRC proceedings. Departments l n0: re:resente: will ce notifie of any WRC actions l wnien may affe:: them.
NOTE: QA will review all m dification work pr esses and testing prc edures t: determine ne need for ince:encen; witness /holc points.
3.? Prie- to a m:difica icn oeir; implementec, the WRC will, in a::Or:ance witn A ministrative Dr0:ecure G-9:
3.4.1 Ensure that any are::se: we-k has beer. :learly and a:e:La eiy defined. Tne WR: will aise make re::mmenda:iors to NE -51:e en how to "split" CN ca:xages in:: CsDs (oner ne:essary).
3.4.2 Evaluate ne general effe:: Of pro: sed work on Otner Oiant systems, con:itions or coerations, in terms of :lant safety margins, :ne Ie:nnical See:ift:a-ions, a:ministra:ive peccecures and persenrel crete::icn.
3.4.3 02:e-mine raciatice :ro:e::4:r -e:ui-ements.
3.1.1 ?
Revie. re me:ifi:::ier f:r i.:a:: on :e a: ions an: ::e a:ing Orcee:ures, an: icentify ary sce:ial
- -airing nee s.
3.4.5 Review :ne ::ifi:::icn fo< in a:: en ciner f a:ility a::ivities, in:iucing ce:ar: er:31 pr::e:ures, surveillar:e tests, ne Racioi0gical Emergen:y Rescense Dlan (REED), anc general trairir; needs.
ecau cis: = aus j
TASMAP-7 Issue 3 PubilC . FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 3 of 9 0 SGIVlC9"Pusuc SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 4.0 PROCEDURE The WRC reviews proposed modification activities at the Design Change Action Request (DCAR), Change Notice (CN) and Controlled Work Procedure (CWP) stages, as applicable.
4.1 Desion Chance Action Recuest (OCAR) 4.1.1 Initial Submittal The request will be reviewed by the WRC to determine feasibility and establish priority. This review will be documented using Attachment TASMAP-7A as applicable.
The results of the review will be presented to Plant Management.
4.1.2 Discositioned Subnittal The dispositioned request will be reviewed by the WRC to determine the adequacy of the disposition, to initially consider the overall effect, and to reestablish the priority if necessary. This review will be documented using Attacnment TASMAP-7A as applicable.
In cases where a CN has been originated from other than a DCAR, Nuclear Engineering will generally i suomit a memo with the preliminary design data to
- the WRC for review, These "proposed CNs" will be reviewed following the same guidelines of a dispositioned DCAR and documented using Attachment TASMAP-7A (indicate that the item is a proposed CN in the DCAR No. blank).
The results of the review, including any recommended design considerations, will be presented to Plant Management.
4.2 Chance Notice (CN)
The WRC will review the submitted CN to evaluate feasibility, overall adeouacy, operational impact, and establish priority if necessary. This review will be documented using Attacnment TASMAP-78, as applicable.
The results of the review will be presentee to Plar.t Management, tomuICl37 3 M43
TASMAP-7
, 1ssue 3 Public FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 4 of 9 SerVlCO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 4.3 Controlled Work Procedure (CWP)
Tne CWP will be reviewed by the WRC to determine the acecuacy of work description and any limitations involved with implementing the work. This review will be documente,d using Attachment TASMAP-7C as applicable.
(NOTE: The review of CWPs not associated witn an approved CN will include the considerations in Section 4.2).
The WRC will also determine any special requirements necessary to imolement the work, such as; scecial clearances, training, Setooint Change Requests (SCRs),
l Alarm Index Change Requests (AICRs), Cold Checkout Tests (CCTs), Functional Tests (Fis), operating procedures, and departmental procedures.
l Any attachments associated with the CWP (i.e., Fis, CCTs, l SCRs, AICRs, or Ooerating Deviation Recuest information) l will te eviewec by the WRC using Attachment TASMAP-70.
l This review ensures that tne attachments are both l aopropriate and comolete prior to Plant Management l approval of tne CWP.
The WRC should be mindful of "follow uc" items to be monitored afte* comoletion of the modification work.
Tnese items should be noted on Attacnment TASMAP-7C.
The CWP is then processed in accorcance with Acministrative Procedure G-9.
4.4 Modification Follow-Uc Following the ccmoletion of modification work, tne WRC will conitor anc ensure close out of follow vo actions previously icentified, as apolicable. These actions may incluce, but are not limited to, cancelling associated Temocrary Configuration Recorts (TCks), ensuring tnat procecure enanges are implementec, closing associated commitment items, anc verifying that suggestec training has teen imolemented.
- This review will se c
- cumentec us.ng Attacreent TASMA -7C as applicable.
1 l
l l
l l ,cau con = awa m
TASMAP-7 issue 3 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 5 of 9 0 Service'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO l 4.5 Work Review Committee Minutes l All WRC proceedings are documented using the review sheets I snown in Attachments TASMAP-7A, TASMAP-73, TASMAP-7C, and l TASMAP-70, as applicable. In addition, an attencance l sheet it completed for each proceeding.
l The minutes of a proceeding is composed of the associated l attendance stset and all review sneets used curing the l proceeding. Periodically, tne minutes are routed to the l attencees for approval and signature.
5.0 REPERENCES G-3 Action Request - Preparation and Processing G-9 Controlled Work Procedures P-1 Plant Operations Q-3 Design Control System Q-11 Test Control 6.0 ATTACHMENTS TASMAP-7A Design Change Action Request Review Sheet TASMAP-78 Change Notice Review Sheet TASMAP-7C Controlled Work Procedure Review Sheet i TASMAP-70 Controlleo Work Procecure Attacnment(s) Review l Sheet 7.0 CCMMITMENTS None FORM sCs 37: 3 X43
TASMAP-7 Attaen. TASMAP-7A
/ Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issue 3 O SerVICO~ PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO age 6 of 9 e s:ri p tion: 0Mt No, to: Oest..
Sitta? !'.:-'ttal: 04:e te:sive2:
et: 'es ta; lata(s):
l i l l l tri:Ti :.t: Tit:A 1:!'.' i.I:l ::*?INTS I l ! I l l Feasi:14;;/: . I j l l 0:e-att: mal le efit i I l t -::st I: t ate I i !
! Lt: ease !ffe:: I I i 1 Fe?s:? el safety i I l l . : :: er.s !:st/*3 l l l l ~
Cuer I i l i l i 1 l Friorit/: i l !
l 4e:: e w. : s: 1 i l i l I ':
. C;'.!!s!'.'s : A; ee :tsa;ree i i n':1 Iv!NT: A;;t:VI: tr. I' '.E:
. :ste: l l 1ent : %: tear :::. e ts f:r Of strt:. tics: Cate: 1 I l O'id s -e: !.: 'stal: :ste te:eive::
2: reette; l ate (s):
I e i l l KI;;rs :t!?It!A l ai'.'I r. !: t : r.-INT 5 I I t i i
! :::.4:/ .. D .::n n: 1 l I i ::st Ist ate 1 1 1
! 7 ett- ra y :sta l l I l Ove all !!'e::: I I I l 7 :::.r:1 I I I I Lt:e str; I I I l 2 '_t u I I I l :t:1 te:wi e: I i l i I i 1 i Am . t,: 1 I l I ie::- n :4: :as: !
I I i !
I tet. et : ',1 39 (::te) F7:- 1 l .;; :: : s.s: ;ees :' tag **e 1 l =.t '. :: Lvis t : a!'::iE: ::.I:*I: Cate: 1 J ! -t 1: .:'eae *::' e r t s f:e
. 'st :. :9 -
- ate: 1 I I somu sc. 37: 2.2 wo m
TASMAP-7 Attach. TASMAP-73 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issue 3 ay 7 d 9
) Service'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
- ?i: sten: :'; ss.
Sfs:ss:
!atstatt ; :::; t :- :: :t: e :,"*:t:
?y;e o f *'; ::' :* e): "0;'..* Is t U. 7. . A. *i. . . . P.00:!;:AT.::N
!afi:/ :als::: (:fr:le): YI! --- * "-
A3
?:t: tej.tra: :'r:'e): YI! / , ,!h !.1 '. ITA 0 7
' ~ ~ ' '
.t: wi e f f.9 ; ste(s):
1 -
, i I .
I t!.:i4 :::7It:A i v! E!3 l :::*.*is t! !
I I t i
! fesa.;i.);f: I l l 1 '.f t er s e I"e: l l l l Fers: rei !afe:y l 1 l l Ot ar l__l l l . .. I ...l.... . .. .I l ! ant;i 838:.ar/t l l l l !*.e:t :si i l 1
! * : a 1:ai i ! I i 1:r;:wrai ! ! I l is(atf !.ei.att:n l l 1 1 1:.t u 1 l l l 1:1 1 l l l 0::.te*:s ! I l l l 1 I l :: era:': a: : ::::. l l l
! Oil / a-t:si I:til 7:te9::al l 1 l 1 P-::::.res I I i
- ::e a: ; 1 I I I
- e:a*: er:a1 l l 1 1 ( '.i s : :e:ar eats) l l l 1 - tit It.'2:v:N i ! I I I:are artu*: s. :les l l l 1 Trat te; 1 i l I ::n at:r I i i
! - :::ar ental 1 1 1 I
!:e: al '.e : e I i i i !:,: ai 8' art :: :tt': s I ! I i :.- ; *:::'::: :a .:n l l l I los. .... 1 to:.t-e e :s ! I I l t I i i- . 1:f: 1 1 !
- ;
- - :e. : s. ,, i 1 I t I
< tet.r e: : '. I on (:ste) '8** i l l
. ...4- y;s,. .. .,,..*
- ta ::.r- ate: 1 I I FORV10.3'; 22 ,&3
TASMAP-7 h tech. TASMAP-7C Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issut 3 t Service'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLOR /JO IF ' Of 9 4
Ces:-1;; tan: C.'8 WS.:
l4 %;.
7-t:rt y:
C,7 to:':: 'i: - ( !y:
- ~i. 5;A- ' aft:> inir.e:: i .1 &
'.';; w ee.fr; l ate (s): , , , , _ _ _ .
l t l
l
' ti .':7 ;iti.:t t *:ri l ::*rbis I t
I i i l l t :::.a:/ : .:rs .es.r ;;:en: I I I I
l v: t 13:t; ens !. I 1 l i :: :: .: titty . s I i
- tra:'s; te:;tre ests I l i 1
Ot;/;re.::41 !:i:: 7:: stfal I l l 1 I i l l
I I .'et m toms: I I I
I To: ital 1:::tft:astsas l I i !
) :e:tal Plant :: .:tttsas I
(
i : re- (s:e: ff): 1 I
I I
)
i : :;e settry to:.-+ :-etts: l'es f u I Le.,:,_,1 1
! :.a; :.es an:e i _ ! _, I i 1
I I
! T. a ir.t ag i _ i ,,,,
I i l 1 I ';I (A::1) l i
r ! - l . _- j l
i i 0:e*atta; #r::./: : m. I _ l ,,,, . _,,_ l 1
i : :s*:-estal i I i l l
I I ( *. ' s : ::re: eat (s)) i _ l ,,, 1 I
l !_I _ I __I .
rr cr 7 I ;
i .i; ..rie sus: _ _ , _
_ l i I
.i.
top o r. : :: 7 :: f:e tevte, tf to: wired f ser r- .* te.
- ral tevte. *a:::
I i I .
6 i t I
~~"? bis I (
i :'.::!!~ 7. 7.1 . 6 *
- bi
. :' ' A T e: .1 !a te i .'-o I l
f I ! I f ~I j- .s f ,,,-- .
. ::e: 1,,,I_i I_l I l
l ::se. : ::::.-es :ss.e: l , ,, I ,,,, I .,_,,_ i I I i
- :ar . +-u: : ::::.-es i _1_l _lI l ,_ l _, ! ,_,, I ,,,, i I
1 l
i
- a:- *; :-2 4 e :t-i ::?? ; e :: ".:se: I _ i ,,, ! . . 1 ,,, 1 ! ;
Ii !
I I i l
..4 7;. A. ,. . ..r . . e . .; ;.- a.s$
. . . .wa(r.- .. _
f I
l kI +), h)
.k'
=* ' 1 TASMAP-7
, Public ' FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Attach. TASMAP-70 service" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 3*'
Page 9 of 9 CVP A7?ACFMEM73 CSP No.:
WRC Meeting Date(s):
Attscaments ,
OCR Info: Yes No 5:2/AICE: Yes _ No _ Numoer(s):
CCT: Yes _ No _ Nummer(s):
F7: Yes _ No _ Num:er(s):
C:molete for FT's only
- 4. uiaE] I TYPE 3 0F TESTING I In:1 COMME.175 fes e io l Meenantes1:
Cacacity _ _
riow - -
Ocerability - _
j Qtner __ __
I i
Eteet-ical:
Ocerational moons _ _
Alarms OAS incuts irto logic
[ [
l Otner i i.
Is tne 302 information aceouate? Yes No N/A Is tne SC2(s)/AIC2(s) 4:eauate? Yes No N/A Is tne 00!(s) adecuate? Yes No N/4
- s the F7(s) soecuate? Yes No N/A 2e:3emeHJttons: _
FORM tC3 372 22 3643 [
.. .-. , _ , . . . . _ _ . , . . , _ , ~ , , _ , . . _ . - , _ . . , _ . ~ . . . . . . . _ _ , . . . . - . . _ , . , , , _ . . . _ _ _ . , _ . . , . . , _ _ _ . . _ _ , , , . . _ _ _ . _ , _ Q
N h' Wy Interotrice M. emo
/
/ ,) Public Service ~ m -se-255e Pubre Service Company of Cokrado
>J DATE: June-4, 193e E TO: Fiie I F ROM. - M. G. Brissor., Te:nnical Services Engineer l
SUBJ: LER 85-029 GENERIC IMPLICATIONS
-l.
, Various fire carrier semis were insce::ed tnreugnout tne pian; tc I.
j ce:errine f ree. a generi: coin c' v i e r. , tne nagni v:s c e tne ina:e:vate fire carrie cenetra:icr. seai :ni:Lness pro:le icentifie:
i r. LER E5-029. All etner insee:tec seais were founc tc ce acce::abis. The proble: was ce: err.inec tc te specific to tnese cable cenetratiers between :ne auxiliary eie :ri: ro:: anc tne central turbine building as discussed in tne LER.
i d10-M. G.
hidlem
- ,r!sson Tecnni:ai Services Engineer M35:dj I e k
Ii 4
I t
l i
I. .' , ,i
/
i l '.6 $* :," ' t I-
i Attaen. TSP-9F
. e. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO Essue 8 g
A
- FOPT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION page 1 of 1
, , b ui1&N CLOSE0VT DATA
- 1. Front page shewing 30 day reporting requirement met. #)f0db d2-h6-Ib
. Initials & Date
- 2. Corrective action page with each action numbered. MbInitials &N~$SC Date
- 3. Copy of tiesing document numbered to correspond to 3. Mb 3 -K-S'6 Initials & Date
- 4. Copy of LER. M$ / cTe,@
i Initials & Oate i
i i
i
- Report No
- $ 5 'AA Issue O
.s Closecut Data Approved: '/f#[ [ 4/1[
l Gdtials & Date 0
1
['G t:. SuL e -/y-M
-4
' h )u3'ic Service-16805 WCR 19 1/2, Platteville, Colorado- 80651 me s.,e.
company of colorado January 17,.1936 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-86037 Decement Control Desk.
V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
Licensee Event Report 85-029, Final Report
REFERENCE:
Facility Operating License No. DPR-34 Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a copy of Licensee Event Report No. 50-267/85-029, -Final, submitted per the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1)(b).
Sincerely, lld Y J. .. Gahm
' Manager, Nuclear Production Enclosure c:: Regional Administrator, Region IV Attn.: Mr. E. H. Johnson, Chief Reactor Proje:ts Branch c:: Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn.: Mr. H. N. Serkow, Proje:t Director Standarization and Special Profe:t Directorate cc: Director, MIPC JW3/jlr REVIEWED BY: f zum r_ v# / //r/74 LE ENSING /
4 . - . - - - .
Ui aio m s. m e - cs u: . ..m l * *2' .e.. 3,Ec c .. so a m eio.
, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
DOC u t t svuuSE R E23 lFLCILITv .saut (1)
- l. Fort St. Vrain, Unit No. 1 o is t o io t o i 2! 617l 1 lorl015 tel Impaired Fire Barrier Penetration Seal, tvt~T oin isi u. v .t. . j .E,0.T oin 7, oTMcR, ciuf,uiwotvco ..
l
~*-u om o auw'iR4
,uovial oav i v t .. l 71 . t v t;p.*q ; = ,m uesT4 o., i vt..
e c ur 0 !sio lo t oi ! i 1l 2 1l 8 8l5 8l5 0l2 l9 0l0 0l1 1l7 8l 6 o is!o t o , o, ; i TH:s atro47 is $UsutTTEo PVnsuAwT To TMs aloulm tMENT5 Of 10 C8 R {- (Cw' eae er **g er are tene.est Oli C*t R ATIN3 Moot m N 20 4C2M 20 405ts $4.73:elt!Hhl 7 3.711161 54.73 ' sit 2 H et 73 71181 Povvt m M 405 elill(0 scx H1) -
LivtL (10) nln{n v v v M 405:aH1Hil $4 Malt 2) M.73 alt 2Hes! OTHE R (50erdr sa deervrf
- ee en ead se Terr, 4 40 Forva M MsH1Hiill 54.73;st:2HO 54.73, alt 2HvillH Al M AI M C5dit1H8'l SC 73;al:2H81 W.73.eH2HvialiS6 I M ol4H1Hel 1 54 73 4H2Hm1 54 73teH2H al LictN$tt CONT ACT FDR TMIS Lim (121 NAA4E l T E LEP.iO48 NuvlE
- Jim Ecgebroten, Superintendent, Technical Services Eng.
- a t a C::t I I I i ! ! ! I I CCMPLETE oNE LINE Pom EACM CouacNE AT F AILunt Cts alBED t% TMtl A EPCRT (13 CAU5E Sv5Ttv Cowrow t wT gf "('g0g",I,*gSI" CAUSE Sv5Tt u CowroNENT ""g*(a"O "{*0[,
g TABLE.
ggg A N! A S! E; Art D;2:1; 7 No i e i i i ! !
t I I I i l i i I i I i I I -.
SLsPP L E W E NT A L m t PO R T E XP E 't D 414,
. . E xPECTE suiv w o%
D vts In ve, n im tur:rro svowssiov ca rri T] no i f f LSIT R ACT 4.sNr w IA4 w. a e , esema.s ieer rensea og ease.e treemerreve eaev H 6 On De: ember 18, 1935, fire barrier cene: ration seal 43T2 was discovered to have a two inch diemeter hole through the penetration. Tnis impai rment was tne result of personnel error.
On December 30, 1935, an inspection following repair work on penetration 43T2 revealed that it was still impaired as it dic not meet the minimum thickness requirement of the three hour fire barrier seal soe:ification. Furtner inspections of similar fire barrier seals indicated that eight ttner penetrations, 43M2, 43E2, 3831, 25T1, 32M1, 30T1, 30M1, and 3031, did n:t meet the minimum thickness criteria of the seal specification. These im:sirments were the resu't of personnel error during installation of a seai m difi :: ion.
Corre:tive a:: ion in ea:n case included tne irrediate esta:iishment cf a fire watch foliued by the satisf actory re: air and i r.s c e::i c n of sa:n :f tre imaaired fire barrier :enetration seais.
Th s event is re::r:able in a:: rdan:e witn 10:FF.50.73(a)(')(i)(3).
G l ti l o.7 -.
9 @ lh O n,/!
, G(,,/y .
su 5G M is h :u tttl N
e
' g rc * **
- J644 u 8 a v vCLtaa atoutatoav cowwss,og LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ===:vic eus so m-oi 4
....is . w wc o ,
l . .cn. . .m n, u . t t,,,,,,,,,,, ; ,,,,,, ,
Fort St. Vrain, Unit No. 1 ,,..j ju o.,s """" .q
..,..e
'"~""
o15101010121617 81 5 -
0 12!9 -
010 012 0'O 15 rm= = . - m,,mu.w, BACKGROUND:
Fire barrier penetration seals are required to be inspected either annually or immediately following maintenance which may disturb the fire barrier retardant material. This assures that the fire barrier penetration seals remain intact in accordance with Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 5.10.4.
The fire barrier penetration seals in question encompass all cable penetrations between the central turoine building and the auxiliary electric room. All were inspected i r. January 1955, in accorcance with the annual surveillance requirement and again in July 1955, following implementation of a fire barrier penetration seal upgrade cesign change program. Both insoections inaicated that the seals were acceptable.
EVENT DESCRIPTION:
On November 25, 1985, fire barrier penetration seal work associated with installation of the new Steamline Ruoture Detection Isolation System (SLRDIS) i was initiated in the vicinity of penetration 43T2 under tne protection of a
, double rocm tent. The tent was set up in accordance with Public Service Company's procedures for work involving ascestos handling. The scheduled fire
~
barrier penetration seal work was completed on Decemoer 17, 1985, and the protective double room tent surrounding the work area was removed. On
! December 18, 1985, fire barrier penetration seal 43T2 was discovered tc have an approximate two inch diameter hole through the upper left hand corner of the seal. A continuous fire watch was immediately established and tne hole in the penetration was repaired.
On December 30, 1955, an inscection of repaired penetration 43T2 revealed that, altnough the recent repair work was satisfactory, the seal was still impaired as it did not meet the minimum thickness recuirement of the three hour fire barrier seal specification. A continuous fire watch was immediately establisned. Further inspections of similar fire barrier seals indicated that eight other penetrations, 43M2, 43B2, 3831, 35T1, 32M1, 30T1, 30M1, and 3081, did not meet the minimum thickness criteria of the seal specification (a.tual 10-11h inches versus required 12 inches). A continuous fire watch was again immediately established.
CAUSE:
It is believed that the two in:n hoie :nrough cenetration 43T2 was inadvertantly created during the ccurse of tne scheduled fire carrier penetration seal work in that same area. It is pec:able that the presence of the double room tent delayed discovery of this impairment.
k tl 8)
er EC f ore 3644 y 5 %vCtg&A REGute!OST COww'LPO%
LICEi4SEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ue=os to owe se n-eic<
i.1.is a v .
- ActLITY hawl 4.s OocalT seuwata m gg a huwee n it. ,Act 0 l
-,. u -
,,,,i' g 'a.
Fort St. Vrain, Unit No. 1 ' ' " " "
l . 015 t o 10 l o 121617 815_- 01219 -
010_013 ? 0 15 rixr= ~ . - . - ..c, m.,,nn It is believed that penetrations 43T2, 43M2, 43B2, 3331, 35T1, 32M1, 30T1, 30M1, and 3081 did not meet the minimum thickness criteria of the fire barrier seal specification cue to personnel error during installation of the July 1985 fire barrier penetration seal upgrade design change program. The seals werr inspected after the modification program was complete, but the surveillance procedure used for the inspection had not been modified to include the new seal specification acceptance criteria.
ANALYSIS OF EVENT:
This event is recortable in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1)(B).
Technical Soecification LC0 4.10.4 recuires either an intact fire barrier penetration seal or the establishment of a continuous fire watch. It is clear that these impaired seals pre-existed both their discovery and the consequent establisnment of continuo,us fire watches.
There was no significant safety hazard to the plant as a result of this event.
It has been concluded that fire propagation through a single two inch diameter hole, surrounded by sealant material, would not significantly affect the
~
seal's fire barrier rating. Also, halon leakage out the two inch diameter hole would not significantly affect the. halon fire suppression system or ultimately the fire protection system within tne auxiliary electric room. ~
The effect of the inadequate fire barrier penetration seal thickness (actual 10-11 inches versus required 12 inches) would be to reduce the seal's fire rating from three hours to two anc one-half hours. While this recuction would not meet tne Nuclear Regulatory Commission's recuirement tnat a fire barrier penetration seal be qualified to the same fire rating recuirec of the surrounding barrier, it would not significantly affect tr.e safety of the plant as the design basis fire for that area of the plant would be rapidly detected and suppressed (Reference 1).
.c.3....
,, n .
Ie..,n.s u wetaan niousavon co-o.ss.of LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION a aovie eus so vsc-eio
,,..g i....,...j ... . s e Fort St. Vrain, Unit No. 1 """' '"*""
l 0151010 l o l 216! 7 815 -
012!9 -
0 I 0.0 l a F n ls ren-~.~. - _uc , mu ,, a CORRECTIVE ACTION:
Corrective action included the im.medi a te establishment of a fire watch i followed by the satisfactory repair and inspection of each of the impaired fire barrier penetration seals.
Additional seals were inspected to assess, from a generic point of view, the magnitude of the inadequate fire barrier penetration seal thickness problem. y All other inspected seals were found to be acceptable. The problem has been determined to be specific to those cable penetrations between the auxili a ry electric room and the central turbine cuilding.
The fire barrier penetration seal surveillance crocedure will be revised to include all appropriate seal acceptance criteria prior to the next scheduied {-
surveillance inspection. Additionally, the design change review process has been revised, subsequent to review of the July 1985 seal design modification, to better track and more thoroughly review and cocument the effects of a design change on plant procedures.
REFERENCES:
- 1. Evaluation of Fire Protection Provisions for Fort St. Vrain, Public Service Company Letter P-78182 from J. K. Fuller to W. P. Gammill Novemoer 13, 1978.
l l
l l
l I
l l
l s.: , 3. . n. .
et 03
e kkC *,-s 3s4 4 U 6 NvChita e4 Gut 4702, cowwrsaioN LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION ** aos to eve +o v w-cie4 f amais 4 31 e p acite t, e.aug e t, 00Catt huwataL2' LER huwsthse ' A G E 13 l
Fort St. Vrain, Unit No. 1 g ,. , n......,
' ' ' ~ " "
....w.
trxt e, - - . . ..c % m ., n r.
015101010121617 815 -
Ol2lo Ol0 o!: Of n Ic d icot Act Marcia G.'Brisson Technical Services Engineer i
AL W Q MEgc eoroten Technical Services Engineering Suoervisor i
Licensing Review By: 7 016 te7 ogg f
l
<pi N re j' u4 w} has t Jirn Grp iing Nuclear Licensing-Oie ations Supervisor
.af C. H. Fuller Station Manager
//I)$$
/~
/ J. W. Ganm Manager, Nu: lear Produ: tion
.e.e.w x..
et $3-
%W W W j pg g FORT ST VR AIN . NUCLEAR GENER ATING STATION
) S OfVIC Ow PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO .3d2 gi: . 5tDESCRIPTION -
- @a ' %. -
IIEM NAMEf NUMBER SAf tiY HELATED RESPVNdit3LE dVVEHVibVk
- c. a +m pmw+,o n SW s E E' eshp"e SYSTEM NO. EOUIPMENT NO. l LOCATION REF. DOC. NO 54:e c
~
N e- S IO<> Aux E~lectru c Rcom w- s-is DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE ,
The- %dousm cable Sra f en eVf* hon 5 a fe nob m accorcle n c-c. Wl% Pe C ' S' Cd'O M# 6 ~ #b ~
43T'l ) 13 Mq
~
4 381) sot 1) ~ 30m1 3 3O B1) 3361 32 M1) cm c] 3 3 f.1 , j4 /l p e.n etr d,on s a re_ Ic>cc t m the Avx E lec.tric_ ham .
[
WHAT CAUSED THE NONCONFORMANCE?
Usk'n O k) V\
INITIA D Y: QA REVIEW:
><4'
, rscs.ruai
.ff.2/_Bh
?c re is.c.%.runi
._ b/%
ie.ru
,t.'
,IdDISPOS * .~ .
DISPOSITION: L) R ET. TO VENDOR __ SCRAP p' REWORK LJ REPAIR L' USF ASIS INSTRUCTIONS: Ph g r/i'M Te o ^e f 3 2. M i AwO 35 7 l AR2 To 6 4. wo c k /LO v/A c u g4-oooV Asvo
/% nww s +' T D, V3 M 2,, f 3 82, Ji% 7/ , 3s sy/, j, g, _ygg
,!:, ,_,'.,:1 k ,exr & As* & #4MP /w b ona w c w,W, y = P, _g PS s919-./ y fe: GN- 2as . />'* N : flu m tw &) i e .- ~2e ,2caunap
,e%7 hoiza 4vr _2% aim th A*Woa.x ,0s. m s, % <
4 ce:P is-oco y '"
O: 40 v m DR- s': -lolq-pss/ comp /ck ; -
"4 m cm <m.ds 6 sex -w- s - i s'.
- f. \/. .I c.LgW '
/ 4
TS .
/)7[6(- I h
l PLANT MANAGEMENT (EMERGENCY DISBURSEMENT ONLYi i COMPL RESPO' IBLE SUPERV:SOR I[O l
1 -
n.,.- ,,. n i n. ,; v. , 1,Q .sr.., .v
- l o Ml .,,
1 ' ' ' "
NE7 i VERIP BY QC" l
s y. .
/- W ,
,f-2.e W,.,, L m... w t zo 8 C z...
T dI4' l NFSC REo o $C YES "LA /// PORC PEQ'O ~' N O
' Nt1 YS % No
%v'rcro s 1
. , ; . .m. . . .
l 9 2 1 ,> d ... %A.m._
row : 37: r e pyrg g 4 g.6
Public FORY ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Service- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CWP NO. 8-/Od e CWP DR/NCR PAGE SCHEDULE CN NO. 2/36 Page / of 1__
P
.h,f .- . DR / NCR NUMBER AFFECTED -
D ENE i
M - ses 9 - /- A tbfrl l ..-2
_ . . r,w . _ . a. . - .*N ti- e' -85 "Dit, e r~ fia w _ 113lra
.' *- CA ns e 7'v,e rer< rn e S a n lY M < s rA t thes u >-
t-( .,
Fn an u a <, nou Lu W w ,. <,, n see,r 'o r , a. a.
n Yn srswrw < p . ,s or
1 l'c i+ >&u k . 11.vo u a r* J /t.,m 7 R$-1614-/=G S'io, si,17, 2 K 2 K. % -), on,. 4 3 // - !!" U 'Ah n e
- w .s u n w e. %k n 9 s r v c s, si,. w a rt e u ,
o *J n r ,>,csa <.~ou.r anu or ro A so n t r$5-/os 9 -/ - C M5*L 8,/0 /217M/9.7llua.?sf1.)6vne r v'-se Psi s l o /' 2h & zi W<//
- ' / 3)J-n /en r .,//n a ,<w
\
, s ' gilm 'M ' ~
i>.4% a.i>
l , n
7 'st 4 LIEz/ou,i sui
\ , o a a NJ 6 JrwiAh n ;o s * ..
\
it Cit 3 2 .~ I m'y fmia
/f?3-/o/ '1 -/ - 1)
~ ~
M*WT U N C J >Ar/tr JJx w C,>:r_/ 67,_
" It- n -~ 'I 5 _oltXi,]5 A L > Q /p2
" nr u ' s A ir K w &
1,85-10/9-/- f si n n t . r'-? r ! ! r' T 10 h + t O u , t -s ,,
U U WS ]! ' ' ~ l a> W&l~Y E d4. P $ rx [ ops sU e N;h&V
'/ ' b A i A lb '
Il DJt% sr-70 3 > sx /G ii ny. ..a.. T '"~'ff * ""
~
li k)& ku../ ,4g pitV R5-/o/9 -/- id* d/D L/N H$fk'r ').4on 'Ak ri.
l'~ p r cc . .i ..)/6/.W- - "1" a p.) Q , ,. f'3, g A y m . , 4 l l x l'-- -
I' 4 E mr Aci AM't
/ \ d
! si 3 C il d r N A Ion 6 r $
l 2 R 9 - 9M i A Jn A.J L I kks-(5a Dil-ss wie -i-c n
df-/0/9-/ - fl'
~
"/'Ad70. "s~'e A5*7 s4f1 IliAS-Ar- tJf,a(4r> f 2AO'A)// ,
s' *sse M s99 Ad'w'"4 M 'i' kiPr-/?'rs hio.rudtz.
- l. // f A$0, W W D
ztC(Vl. " -
Ngi A 0 *iY Ki"7d*2/ 9/. ! u 11
, // $? l }/ 1 AC-/0/_f-/-/^7' i~ MQ i*'M %2 NY.2- labA'M5" car. . Se_ // 42,_/ / [W/o/f- / ^'10,'# // ,}/2 '"A 'C?f fn,l1s/.$'BTdthrik 5) UkA8 5 y =42 i r WW: 6> e ' fac Rurnu-e .'"74 x?sh 6 ' <b
& ar_wwt'Auw l
! i* 's'~j'l [ /] w a M 7 'f 8 /*
- 5) 6 fl r 00soatl.1
.) ' S~-/e1.9 - / - J .Gonat MbaL[)r.,.br-%R lut'
_ '* /o/_7 - / - K AJo n L h,, J,A7s ts i h A. A d L. J' \ H it 1 . , ,. ! ~ ~ s&L As r ,_/ib5triscfhd io Foem 344 22 4732 sf it f.u. oxy,f_,< J _-/l oms _
P@ llc FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING SrATION PURUC SERVK;E COMPANY OF COLORADO E Service' CWP NO. 88 /"#/1 CWP DR/NCR PAGE SCHEDULE CN NO. 2/R ) Page _ 4 h of 8 PiTR P
! 98 i r4CR NUMBE3 ppECTED DATE COMMENTS BS-/o/ R-j - [ ~ u 'ji & ,l B 7 6 l g l bty) i DsunQ&_
h
]Euaon A w. Q u'/t.s
.s2ljkRA5-/_cc5' . A.hJ L f f ;fe,- I )/J S & A j.c 9t' Rs -/n/9 -/ -/A 4 7 #68 s/ h;y (!/iee r is
~/0)9 -/ - E/ #d,7 NYf K "A / 572. l4b','~si' K 1.)fdA[r s~2O_ff. 9e5 5.);)g Q;. h,, 'g
~
~ ' '
[ d' s/
\ e I l' Nrots a .$,w ,,, A s' // l l' 50Ao$s A&><&
M-/o/C7 -/ - O I L)n A)t _5~ {5Yr l Q<-in/G-/-/ A tf, A k2ll/A
!/2/3 s.S,c Ans.- Roe.a if}n
/' u \ s' 3 M rjo' Clh.str
' 't 1 " >} d ,,ae L ' A r n s bolus MJw Aeo.
K-/o/9-/-f) A)MJd Ate
/z/f" [_5)CK b/ w NJ 12./4ks o 4}r elm
~~
f " '
RC-/o/7 -/-/E @-3 Me9' I l,2 l' If D6/' IIE K}/on JNc/}Sr. fort Srs/1s Ad.w /_u~hA 5tS-/o/9 -/- 3 "3' "M - kclyg'r_2LA,4snelx 6im
- l',a I,)fx n/>a tlLis '
~
$$~/0/9~/- ? l W7/ N2 Sk lD
~
Ofj/F bL,.y&L VB5vo/9-/-u "8*/3,_h]/ iN <lt % "VLkfa&c._.gbd, h Cogn.,Au
!i d c2 "1/ *kf 571A,) $ A 1s51l st ?) A v A fu n & s u r h /*
JJ4)ikpes.s i f/&rsr.
,f5-/o/7-/- V ,xW1L Qld/H Ng Uwr>th& '
Vl -Rs- /_oj B~
\ /byL ,
/Pr 'lLSL)5 /5
; ^
V?f-M/9-/-&J ~ "?%f & . f' Ss z L d'Gf iM-/o}9 - /- x' KYDAb2-);N se12,;2 I *R6 r An &%L//w ~~
~
l AJosJE. U,f ll,r s WL W } L t
?; kS- 159- /- Y' l s'7 -f MB ll/h/N T \ A C ) O A l/713JkV YW hN/f-l#Y , !.^ zu^
W N' 9) WUc<l
// 8l M l '
((f .9/ isd29 WMOS - 85-/o/9 /-Al iy'QA' di-pr/s2._/Sgt Sroos
~~ ./G' isei? - 8x-w l AJon,6 . , .
_ .. . Q/;,/s2. lak 02-8s-sod -/ -& r- , f , s ,
! ,, , ....,p. ie l l 5
. , . , , ...s . . 's-ll i
~ f- !
SV. . . . .. ... . ff . __ . . . . I
'I_/ ,
4 l Form 344 22 4732
. . . - . ~ . - - . _. _ - -
RERP-CR
. .. Attach. 2 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issue 6 age 1 of 4 VI SerVlCO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NON-EMERGENCY EVENT NOTIFICATION Report No. -
. Year Sequence No.
IMPORTANT: , e-. -
- 4 /-- - -
It is important that the time of all calls and names of people contacted be logged. Any further follow-up calls received or made should be logged as to time and identity of persons involved and the it. forma +. ion transmitted or received shall also be logged.
- 1. Name and Identity of Caller: CF $1 FP'
- 2. Date of Event: [N- Time of Event: b
- 3. This notification appears to be required pursuant to 10CFR_50.72,. par _a kraph ((b)(1), "One-Hour Report"; or (b)(2)
{"Four-HourReport")(circleone).
- 4. Description of Event:
Reactor power prior to event: // OM Loop Shutdown? h Scram? O Initiating signal (s): bT bW.h4 # D U$ Was event result of an LCO Action Statement? Other pertinent information: MrY[FV 7$ M # . f i 43 7~2 , D M 2 , 9'? 82, TO T~/ . TO N/ . V0 BI, 35RI'37Ni,%3yYI 7titchris %Ats k Eaufred /2" Mn1mm % M" 73 /M*
,s /
.W ./ / j h f'
- 5. Actions Taken: F : O $ 6 & 14 esemn
/
s
/
l va ns ' t G@r /Mnk FORMIC 1372 22 3643
~,. - ~ _ , - . _ _ . __ . . _ _ _ . . _. ,-- _ .. _ ,~ . _ . -,... _ _ _ _ __. _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . . . ,
RERP-CR~
. ' Attach. 2 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issue 6 service'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO age 1.of 4 NON-EMERGENCY EVENT NOTIFICATION
, Repcrt No. -
Year Sequence No. IN'ORTANT: It is important that the time of all calls and nanes of people contacted be logged. Any further follow-up calls received or made should be logged as to time and identity of persons involved and the information transmitted or received shall also be logged.
- 1. Name and Identity of Caller: ,
[3 ,v h /!A[
- 2. Date of Event: /?-lo 4 T Time of Event: /70 0
- 3. This notification appears to be required pursuant to 10CFR 50.72, paragra (h ((b)(1), "One-Hour Report"; or (b)(2)
"Four-Hour Report"s)(circle one).
- 4. Description of Event:
Reactor power prior to event: Leop Shutdown? Scram? , 3 _ Initiating signal (s): - - Was event result of an LCO Action Statement? Other pertinent informatt 0[ ,2* c 9e4/ ou
$4' a , i L/1 1 R 0, , j -r len . f .n .
(L ifs wlf 'be Co nl wh oh [ a m M u)%cf3 a[ /2 , L c /, e s
- 5. Actions Taken: '/.'f c. ,m . /c b .0,.;loe! o _ @
~
holn < , '. I s o { - cn ' li. rl L- . c..all h. c, ic :' t is- o .- n-3I- TT \
/
1 l roms:im v.ws m .
RERP-CR Attach. 2
< Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Issue 6 d SOTVICO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO age 1 of 4 NON-EMERGENCY EVENT NOTIFICATION Report No. [/(I). - -
Year Sequence No. IMPORTANT: It is important that the time of all calls and names of people contacted be logged. Any further follow-up calls received or made should be logged as to time and identity of persons involved and the information transmitted or received shall also be logged.
- 1. Name and Identity of Caller: /h7 (d- )b .
- 2. Cate of Event:/2-/M' h[ Time of Event: /#1/O
- 3. This notification appears to be required pursu t .
100FR 50.72, paragraph ((b)(1), "One-Hour Report"; or (b)(2)
"Four-Hour Report")(circle one).
- 4. Description of Event:
, Reactor power prior to event:
i' / k Loor Shutcown? / ,!A Scram? //[ Initiating signal (s): A/ Was event result of an LCO Action Statement? h ((.
-/ 'd
~
O he 8F. /[ h'/f _'33, 2- f//l l I,A m sd of so m:bd)d w ou 4l,n:Epertinentinformation: sud ALLWQ/ L s Ji&Ma ,n,J. 1 ,\0 s ccM k, L' Aa s 2.
<Len sJa.6 ,el 2 -A JIiM' Wc{~
/uhd.4 ufeM f are f a,n - c/ , , e
- 5. Actions Taken: , S/
y . '15=7 #C .4/4i M/G S N ha .,alA ;a 4 a% J& & knx % c!n!Wk?/.. cam 6bbiNi$s!,ocbIledfUc.k'ES- \ es/& :.'ch:L -4M44,/wLvG
'p/c M/s git on l/A a ..v.D'M ap?Al l )S g -iwa! k &cii4 l'ap W NAh f d al'e .
Ic*M tCo 372 22 3*A3
e -
, e assue b; m aca . . c .7 Public FORT ST. VR AIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STAT w"
') Service
- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: FIRE PENETRATION SEALS ANNUAL INS:ECTION DEPARTMENT: ELECTRICIANS
!S SU ANCE 4 f) Y ) g AUTHORIZED e-
%sw s
1 ~e 7
'3 w
. \ l}w 2DRC 6 6 5 MAR 171955 t
*?Ts o 3 IT 5:heduled Date Week A Late Date Sch. Clerk #
This proce:ure cannet be run in its entirety for the followin; reasons:
- 1. This system is not operating.
- 2. This system is not recuired to be operating and has a f recuency of one month or less (ref erence Te:nnical Soe:ification, caracraph 2.18).
h 3. Rea: tor is in "scrammed" conditic.'.
- 4. Loop I is in "Loop Shutoown" condition.
- 5. Loco II is in "Loco Snutoown" condition.
- 6. lA He' 'um circulater is in "t:;ppec condition".
- 7. IB Helium circulator is in "tripped condition".
B. 1C Helium circulator is in "trippd condition".
- 9. 1D Helium circulator is in " . ripped condition".
I
- 10. Otner
- 11. Reschedule test for h Department Supervisor now .:: 2 . :: . x,e
CCT- 2190-1
.C- *
, pub llC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 4
,l @ SOrVice' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: O FT fy CCT O T-Test bl S4 ~ If 5 g9 ,f y g 6 Prepared By: // W - O Reviewed By: #aw~- # _r F6 (Preparer) (Date) yS0pervisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: 93r0 Mwod h/4cna t i - o -re, 6 (QA ServicesP (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: T7 No
~ dMVA--hM (Nu ear Lic. - Operations)
N'O (0 ate) Safety / Environmental f-) // Evaluation Concurrence: dMnH Rph) 1-R-77 (Technical selvix:es') (Date)
/[Yes PCRC JDBC 7 0 7 JAN -81937
~
PORC Review Required: / 7 No NFSC Review Required: [7 Yes /INo NFSC #: Authorized for Use: [s //9[/7 (Station Managar) (Date) Permission to Initiate / Test: /8 v - Ob /-87E[ (Shift Supervisor) (Date) Test Completed: . A -
'/IS /f 7 (Test Conductor) (Date)
Inspection Completed: No Msem jff)A' Serv ~1ce s
//2;3/5'y
/ (Dare)
Supervisor Review: e ..VA / ['23-
$0egmettSuper or) (Date) e 1t n R ts: ,
(Shift Supervis'or) b /'[8-h (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) mu ici m.n.aec
1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. 2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primar y Responsibility S = Support Electricians __p____________ Operations __________________ Results __S__________________ Other _______________________ 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. 23 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date __0$_V__0Y____ _ _?_?_l_0_ __________ _'__h_?__Y______ 3 2 References _____________________________________________ l , 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS ' I 41 Department Approval W /-32~87 iji-5uiiFUiioF-------5aii 42 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number __$$_S I 43 Radiation Work Permit Issued. if required: Number __'d/ e ..osow e e
/ .. .
I CCT-2190-1 Page 3 of 4 6 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 All OR's to the CUP being tested have been revieued and are covered )y this FT. List CUP OR's reviewed: _TrQ. _i_33_.-11p-3,4 : C _$_ 6. y 4 _F _% D: - lld---- b 3-l-T V - /. M WITNESS POINT M..N......MbrZ L'h------f-'4------------------ / VTusnc . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - At_ roa.F..7 - - - - il
- H i l ?- - - - - - - -
&c - /_'lE.'l?7 Init. - Date STNES ,5/ 2 Check all cables for proper terminations per 3:;rr "
7gy viring diagrams. INSPlbf0R M P7
-Elec.
Qr 3 Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall l vlTNESS 63g,7 include, both internal and external parel inspeco utring. A% h2 IP7 Elec. O~ 5.4 During circuit check, all contacts and Y TNE55 f conductors must be verified by closing, r! NT 82?f_fd/ . --
/. blocking or continuity check as the case may l V IN3PEC'CR b
s5t. '}t.3 lP ~7
~5iecI~
55 All parallel paths must be opened and each resultant series path checked individually. AT$ Y}-). P ~7 Elec. l
- 5.6 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not l meet CN criteria, the appropriate organization vill be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT.
yJAn ktri Elec. i 5.7 Uhere complicated or extensive wiring changes have been made, schematics or drawings should j be marked over by a Hi-liter as each segment is checked. However, this will be at the / discression of the CCT performer. A/// /
--Elec.
YU Q /
_ LLi-2190-1_ _ _ _ Page 4 of.4 58 (1ake a copy of'the Test Equipment Section (3.1), include the CCT#, and send it to the Results. Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. , E/R i 1 i I
1 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Odl61 CAL
' 0SCTVICGmPUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF CCLCRADD CN/TCR/SCR/PC NO.CGT_-I 2 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE /e/ _.
CATEGOHV - TYPt O CNOVERALL 0 CN SuBMiTTAt O SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT S TESTREQUEST O TEMPORARY CCNFIGURATION REPORT O PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) O OTHER CL4SSIP9 CAT 10N: ARE THE SYSTEMIS) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCT1JRES INVOLVED. OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFICT: CLASSI N YES O NO ENGINEERED SAFEGU ARD E YES C NO S AFE SHUTDOWN 3 YES O Ni) PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 3 YES O NO SAFETY R ELATED @ YES O N3 SECURITY SYSTEM O YES X NO REMARKS S bl5 EVALUA TION . Use Adelitional Sheets if Requered
- 1. OCES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PRCCEDURES CESCRIBED IN THE FS AR OR TECH SPECS? 8 YES O NO ,
UST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: NM TfC.Y/o/M 4 t// 44u d b .' [2.2,I.
/. 2. Z.. / 4 /. Y. S. / 4!, de , Ar. 2. 2 . V. 3. 6. 3 , ~/ . /. 71/o . 2 8/./. 7. Q.1
- 7. 4, . fi" 2.'2 - T, 2. A . 7, l' A . 2 . 'T V 'Q. J/ ' 9. )Z'. /6. 2. % JhE % N I/ 2. 2, Jhr. I/. V. Z - / '/. s . J. I4. 8. /M /6 14.1). An ' A 4. 2 Gi hs }2 s e . 2d 11.11'
~
15 Z t. ,. ' A,m,. D,l s s e h ' %, u 'n swo usa _ n il/ .* Ms_ ' 4t y /, k2 ' .S'. O l' -
- 2. DCES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? O YES 3 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
3. OETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED is AN UNREvtEWED SAFETY CUESTION UTILIZING THE FOU OWING GulCE (A) HAS THE PROBABlUTY CF CCOURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES CF AN ACC: CENT OR MALFUNCTION CF EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN TH E FS AR BEEN INCREASED? O YES
'7%.e E,/d'clu NO STATE B ASIS: 4 k J. -m ,L
) 70 k.s. m A k ny, a) o% 6 h f=<, b c'3 MA-r*M 1 ) Et1_ k Y-eE. (Yhes n h ts la nw&
rd.A.A. t.: t u_< k A u Ndf aVMt O f* > L m f*-w$=I m W - . O
/ / O - /
- 18) HAS THE POSSIBluTY OF AN ACCIDENT CR MALFUNCT;CN OF A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREV @USLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? C YES M NO STATE BASIS:
S L;G SA. A n s-w Ko f/v/c. />w.,./ o > , A r s. - a- Jid L
+h s- n, s. o s-e rim _,
~
J IC) H AS THE VARGIN CF S
- FETY. AS CEFiNED IN THE B AS!S FOR ANY TECUNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REDUCED C YES Y NO STATE BASIS:
s E::'e s: 4. ~m. m.s ps-e r , an un u a i A r m>rw.
>>sn(P1%1D hh T'A 5'Gn .b C-4;"JD/-h a n 1 '1*N /- }llL b A JA fo d' 4 AJ U'
. mu -Aw .a s L e i.a -r+ n u .% A./ dwaw.A sr enne-h ' R'v 7"7/11 ~7 ts'.s T" .
OCES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO: INVCL'.E AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY QUESTION C YES y NO By g.s... .6 ;.. PPROvED W _.m... o' I ' b ..
,-cm m
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public SerVlCOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN / b __C6 NO. CCT'- 2 l OJ C>- t
' '~
~
PAGE /M/ CATEGORY -- - TYPE: C CN Overall C CN Submittal 17- 2,/ C) o -/ Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? JI Yes G No State basis /)F & e4 CTlUiDJ J$ Cbn$/12&b TO 9'Nf- ACCQ55 SwAV A/F A; TN4 T7Jk 8 > PN &IJLLhlMl't'9AJD T NA' ' Th ^? EU1Lblh Q-Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes 5 No Applicable Regulations l NOTE: If either ansseris Yes. the a:tiwev does not unvolve an unrewesed enwronmental quest?cn S:gn and date the form If both anssers are No. the act.'ktty has the ootent.al for Creat ng an unreyreseQ envrronmental cuest:on. Complete the remarncer of this evaluat on form. EVAI.13ATION (Use additionalsheetsif required) - 1. is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes G No i Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed envircnmental questic.t ) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a l significant increase in the authorized power level? Yes Z No l State basis l l l (C) Does tnis activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES ? Z Yes : No State basis Does the actisity involve an unreviewed environmental question) : Yes : No By --
. Approved
;NA E :: A' t 5 GNANag, u!
F Ca v C, J72 ;4 431Q uJ
pgggg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PU2LIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
, ) Servicot QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of /
Ecutoment Number ecf.2/to / REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Equipment Name Awlt6 CefrWA'l Ce/2c vitT #d MJ /# / UA/utf 8v'*2/P/f' 7tVJ ' 0 & M Manual Equipment Location Leg e.1 6 T ,,b. n# / Co ATr& As.- SSR No. Inspection T,oe ecT /#Q / NCR No. Work to be Performed C X 7 %e/c.6J CWP No. FG - l'13 Other Dd'86* N'5, A - M CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT Call 8 RATED IDENTIFICATION Call 8 RATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC
?5 e m pu n M e 4< ,- I m %ie2 Psc I /7/F 7 of,, '
j i 5' I i !
! I I i i l DIMENSION AL trJSPECTION f PLACE OF MEASUREMENT ! CRITERIA { A/F i A/L f QC I I i i V i i l M/ # ! I i Ls 'A' i l I f l2s* sfu'-alsy l 1 M
~
/ / / l i i
/ I i i
/ 1 I ,
Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Apolicable DC Numbers Below: I i '
! i Quality Control Actions Utinzed (Check):
C StopWork [ NCR O CAR E Tagged Comments ]e G._ C e~t - 2i ro -J TA- 5 //e.~ x a czar's s>ve' 6~FJ" ' Jg,9 Ruw.o A trpeb V N e> ---- 3WG S. / rAn E, */ n.' d L l .l.s.c l lY 2174 "/ Ln la a sl<4%.- -. ///e/? I s -W ' l' i t A</ /2A S Y / f'S _A - A1 sw //,v// 7 <% +'s Inscection(s) / Testis) Completed Satisfactory. 7Yes Z No if NO. explain and refe _, _ ao licable documents in comment section. r j lnspectedp >a ,& /
,fWAf&rn?
Date l/Oh7 -
' l CC RM Bi 372 '2
ri- 2190-1 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION d SOTVlCO* PU2LIC SERVICE COMPANY CF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: 87FT O CCT O T-Test dio f gz - )9 3
/ J // - r .- Jg Prepared By:
B-f/ A //-J'-f6 Reviewed By: '
<xw /'/ W (Preparer) (Date) (Supervisor) (Date) ,
Review / Concurrence: kgoon kduwT/ , , -n .u t. (QA Services)- (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes e-Evaluation Required: O No % MM t\A (4-C (NtpHear Lic. - Operations) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: OMAI , B[8 /- B- @ (Tecnnical W rvices) (Date) PORC Review Required: [Yes O No PORcigac 7 0 7 JAN 8- 3B7 l NFSC Review Required: /7 Yes / No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: t[b / /7 (Station Manager) (Date)
' s i ssion to Initiate ,,
~
ft u g or) at ) Test Completed: o////h'
) k 87 TTest Coffcuctor)]
i (Date) Inspection Completed: ] J/_s"<// p (Date) (QA Services) Supervisor Review: //6/# 4[% */e47 (Departren' 5<i ervisor) ' (Oate) Notification of Test Completion and Results: / N' M
- I7
( nift Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) 1 FeRM tC1372 22 36'3 1 i
~
FT-2190-1 Page 2 of 3
-1 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST le1 To verify correct operation of neuly installed XCR contacts required by the neu Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System (SLRDIS).
2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results _____________________ Other _______________________ 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/ CUP. 2.3 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Identification No. Date Name/ _ _ _ _ _1 0' ______ ____________________ _.____-_________ i 3.2 References ______________,______________________________ 4
FT-2190-1 Page 3 of 3 4.0 AUTHORI'ATIONS 4.1 Department Approval ___ ._______ ;__ __3.;f5 67 Dept. Supervisor Date 4.2 Meck'Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number _k _ 43 Ra . ion Work Permit Issued, if required: Number @_!8__ 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The falouing steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a OC hold point. 5.1 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been
.' reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP \ lTNESS OR's reviewed: _________________________________
CM No.or 92 4 B &-I D-- 4, JNSPECToR --------- -
/ f_G; f# [fGNZ3
- / - - z - - - - - -/- - r- -
____t._ L_ _e.___________________ ______________
~, _ _ / _ **
v- . Init. Date
~ !),N ' g" ,&.,gige, Verify
~' --
gt that FT-2176-1 has been run in its entirety and successfully completed. Y_' _ ' f 53 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3 1), include the FT #. and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used N/A this step. /A _ _ _k_1_ _ _ s
Ogg SOfVlCG= FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORAD3 CN/TCR/SCR/PC. SAFETY EVALUATION NO.f_T-_2ID PAGE / # A7
' CATEGORY 1YPt:
C CNovEnAtt C CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPCRT 8 TESTREQUEST C TEMPORARYCONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURECHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASS 1MCAT108t: ARE THE SYSTEMIS) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVTTY AFFECT: CLASSI 2 YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD 5 YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN N YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 2 YES C NO SAFETY R ELATED @ YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES X NO REMARKS S N Dln EVALUA TION % E4se Additional Sheets If Requared
- 1. DCES THIS ACT1VITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS, CCMPONENTS, ECUIPMENT. TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? Y YES C NO .
LIST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: NM SfC.*/ OAT 4 W4d/ dh .' [ 2 2.I.
._f.2.z../4 /. V. S. / </. 6. 4. 2. 2 . V. 3 6, 1 . 1. /. 7 1/n. 2 v./. 7.Q.5.
- 7. C . T. 2.'2 . T. 2. t 7. 2' A . 2. 't V 'O. J / ' Q. JZ'.
- 14. 4. W. Z - / 4. s . J. I4. 8. /Y.J6 14.1). AnL A 4 E . 16.1. % m.% n . N Q 2.2' z s. 16 . ' A-- D .
W f v neX %( u'_< n uski1H tes ' M Grs'+ y J J2 d
'O's.k m . 1 E 11. / 1 1'
- 2. DCES THE ACTIVITY R EQUIRE TH AT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? C YES 3 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGEO AND THE CHANGES TO BE MmCE:._,
- 3. CETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVC,ivED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETr CUESTION UT'UZ:NG THE FOLLOWING GUCEUNES:
(A) H AS THE PROBABluTY OF CCCU8 AENCE OR THE CCNSEQUENCES OF AN ACC; DENT OR MALFUNCTICN CF EQUIPYENT iMPORTANT TO iAFETY PREVIOUS'.Y EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED? '
- C YES jdNO STATE BASIS
- L'#- h0K 7 d-(B) HAS THE POSSIBiUTY OF AN ACC: CENT CR YALFUNCT;CN CF A CIFFE AENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PaEvi USLY IN THE F',AR BEEN CREATED? C YES M NO STATE BASIS. IM M_ft G 2 2 i
IC) HAS THE VARCIN CF SAFETY. AS CE8 NED i IN THE BASIS FCR ANY NICAL SPEC:FICATION CR IN THE FSAR BEEN AECUCED? C YES no STA TE BA S,5 m g2 2 Y & DOES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO: MCL.E > W. A EVE?.ED S AFETY CUESTION Z YES y NO By Wo M NO;., I
.. .z y d .,, .
pa OvED 'W+-.Y,. . .. l Fo - iCi3'2 C 3322
T h.y 2J 2.
$h. /h s lEOb bW'mSh<v 'll>& F180lty In 54 h'CEs $cac Sl kb/5 wiL(. M72/876 kin 6A) 77/ 6 APPRoBel,97t' mPO7" S/4 AJse L. is so?Pl./Sb Nya u / c.
pw+r ~,'// 4 a- <em o v+b suel#<J >%s. va./ues i;, a+ l cop ubclf r }&s-l ws*ll no b .b&- drok th::l . SJl> /oop5 w:// bc- 1'esh<:l, sep.o<a +f , so .%r- m*. 6sp w.'// Ls sune4,a<, n) +b<.u gu A +A+ +e-s,0,3 3^8 . ~Ist v.4lv+s ik dl4<-,5f <de. c$ .4s. / cops w,'// b+ 6c/,Jns/ 4A<nugav+ ->'A + + x J.4, , y
, app <y,,a eduoL>, d ae- xchiofzo.Ac1w <if ;.,
4 ' w><. <so;g, ;M d +,e spn . l l 6 3c. O>ekoy>,,A+bao+ ,, ~ .// 4 e. q>sr- W O t. Ay nwAe-pa ~ov 4 ,w.%bG h n a/veo ) alw:q ,% daec Inok for,e.Ain sel -/ss A abe.s ne + anpac./ Any , swvc/Mu u-rqvo' reds -AJ sk&& W 6Je>89 %.Mk \-v1
E Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION bbIU
) Servicer PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN No.
/ h ET m - 2.19o - I PAGE 'o8 /
cA ony
- TYPE: Z CN Overall Z CN Submittal YT-7l90-l Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operat:on? )! Yes G No State basis I$ Cbn $/Albb % Y A f~ .ACCQ%5_BAV NkA: ~rH/- &r4CGIJJ}$
n)?A w buuh/AM.uO 'rHA Cf,a e no ' _EU 1 L b l_& ls the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? C Yes No Applicabie Regulations NOTE: If e.tser ansser is Yes. the a:t v.tv aces not involve an unrevesed enwronme'.tal question. %gn and care the form. If both a"ssers are .%o, the act.wtv has the catent at ror :reat ng an unrewesed enwronmentat quest on. Comotete th e rema.nder of th s esaivat.cn form. 4 : : iee Else additiossalshedhif required) - 1. [ is *.he activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES5 Yes O No l Or Supplementary Envirenmental Documents (See O-3)? Identify documents anc document sections reviewed i i l l
- 2. Determine whether or not the acttvity insolved is an unreviewed environmental question using the foilowing guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed enuronmental j question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State bas:s i , IB) Will this activity result iri a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a ! significant rocrease in the authorized power level) Yes Z No State basis ___ _ _ _ . (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously teuewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes : No State basis
+WM Does the actory invoNe an unreviewea enwronmental que., tan) Z Yes Z No By d .
5 . .a v e . d :4 i b Approved 6h4MbW s wave.
)%dl :4 i ,
sw _ r. ;4 ma .a
CCi- 2190-2
.[g Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 4
\ / SOrVICU'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORv, Type: O FT Li7CCT O T-Test ds'v / V6 -/9 f 8C //-f- FC aTA~-
Prepared By: 5A u #-S~-8' Reviewed By: _m (4%t % N e.P4 (Preparer) (Date) (Supervisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: Jh 3kcAnco#hb h o -c eo 6 (QA Services)~ (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No dAkl#-hM l-h bl (Nu lear Lic. - Operations) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 11 d([ /-s-67 (Technicat-Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: L Yes O No PORgQRC 7 0 7 JAN .8- 1987 NFSC Review Required: /7 Yes /INo NFSC #: Authorized for Use: M (Station / Manager)
//f[l7 (Date)
Pe ssion to Initiate f
/ pg j,g g (Shif t Supervisor) (Date)
J Test Completed: . OLI (Test Conductor) (Date) Inspection Completed: [ V/ "/f. 7 (OASev;ge) (Date) Supervisor Review: hM , mM /~2bO7
, ep thntSupervisoG (Date) o n R ts: h- -
M /~ 24 7 (s.:ift Supervisor) (Oate) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) FCRuiCl372 22 3643
,CCT-2190-2 ,
Page 3 of 4 5 0 PROCEDURE 51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been revieued and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR's reviewed: S_Q.- 1 3.4. .A p 6 ,r_C; _ 9 5 _-J j $ p QC
~
49
~
POINT ?INSPECTOR k..h.$7 ~ -- h - - -) Y-t :- -f = - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -
-_%_/_'b.4l?_7 Q: Init. Date W!TNES point . ... ....gf .. 5..//2/ Cheek alI cables for proper ierminations per INSFECTCR virin9 diagrams.
sf
. .s Elec.
O,7NES3
- '4T f 5.3 Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall
;;. E include both internal and external panel utring.
_ M _' P9 Elec.
,' TN'ESS 54 During circuit check, all contacts and
'g7 . *"f M Vgff7 conductors must be verified by closing, l Tiljijg& blocking or continuity check as the case may
_b_b Elec. 1 55 All parallel paths must be opened and each resultant series path checked individually. ' J_05__' t Elec. i 56 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not l meet CN criteria. the appropriate organization vill be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. Elec. 5.7 Uhere complicated or extensive viring changes have been made, schematics or drawings should be marked over by a Hi-liter as each segment is checked. However, this vill be at the discression of the CCT performer. g AAM Elec. Me7
,CCT-2190-2 Page 4 of 4 58 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3 1), include the CCTW, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step.
A%'h877 E/R D 4 4
,. CCh-2190-2 Page 2 of 4 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT.
2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians - p-_______-__. ' Operations -__---_______---__ . Results -_S.-__---____--____- Other _____-___----__..--_-___ 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. 23 None 3 0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date l
-__0YD_N.-__ - - 0_5]_Q_h_-_------- - 2- _-_--_
! 3 2 References ____--__________-_-__--_--_-___--____--_-__-- 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS y Igl 41 Department Approval . a-
.q '
- - _/_.______
Ed p t e pervisor Date 42 Moch/Elec Clearance Issued, if required: NumberIll_1/ 4.3 Radiation Uork Permit Issued, if required: Number . .
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OSOTVlCOw PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY GF CCLCRADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCk N O S C'7 % 2 / 9 0 - Z SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE / e / / __ CATEGORY . rYPE: C CNOVERALL C CN SusMiTTat C SETPOINTCHANGE REPORT 8 TESTREQUEST C TEMPORARYCONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURECHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIRCATION: ARE TNE SYSTEM (8) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURE 3 INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI 2 YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD E YES C NO S AFE SHUTDOWN 8 YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 2 YES C NO S AF ETY RELATED @ YES C NO S ECURITY SYSTEM C YES 3 NO REMARKS S bl5 EVALUATION Use Additional Sheets Ef Required
- 1. COES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS. COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES OcSCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? EYES C NO ,
UST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: NM Sf d 7'*/0MT 4V/4Audh' [2.2.I. I
/. 2. L /4 /. Y. S. / V. d , d./. 2. 2 . V. 3. 4.3 .~7. /. "21/o 2 V.J. 7. d .3 .
- 7. 4ll, . T. 2."2 . Y,2.t. 7 i A. 2. '9. W. 'Q. //. ' 9. lf. 16. 2. 5. Ja' w. n . N EA 2.2#
J M Id. V Z - / 4. 4.1. I4. Z. /Y./6 JV )). A o _', A A 2 Gs >',s I2 > < . 12s." 1 1. 2 1' 1 5 . 2 4 ,. ' A,em,an 1) .' 7~sr_ W %, er_'t n uin sa df/ ! 2M ' M M J, N D ' .5*. Y. / , ! 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? C YES 3 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE: i l i 3. DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITYINVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION UTIUZ!NG THE FOLLOWING GUICEUNES: (A) H AS THE PROB ABILITY OF OCCURRENCE CR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACC; CENT OR mat. FUNCTION CF ECUIPYENT iMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVAL.UATEDIN THE FS AR SEENINCREASED? O YES N NO STATE SASIS: .-
' '1 % . e n /n / c.4 o e k J. ,% ,L ) y n .,8cc.1 m A h n ,n.,u.)
r% a b L**A. f b
- O W -f k=T4 rrt 1 ~~
) KI r l 5.,l- (Y/% Anb tola m a
%) < ,Le s_n> t*Ye tsg s-w t Ore 1 A jdh f ur, r= ,l.[m _g M$e f j -
- 18) HAS THE POSSIBluTY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A CIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREV @USLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? C YES M NO STATE BASIS:
SEC EA. M , ,, n /n //n n-e- w./oA- m ,- m W.. L
-~-
~
+ w ir,s.pser,m /-
l l (C) H AS THE MARGIN OF SAFETY. AS CEFINEDIN THE 9 ASIS FOR ANY TECUNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN RECUCE07 , I C YES Y NO STATE BASIS. 52G 5h. Es $. 1)*.5 PH 'F"> bl_) f % A_1 O fsu A A *'7~ t*11 n % f-BM A tt /s 121 $ TA $$~T*\r bMJkM A n 1 'I"N $= N > A /A AQd slC Jt) \/
*1**A-4 N KW on 3 A b \t* } A *J* d= h w **T*A.) O U n P M 6-A 11" /*t*l/f-f &b A \/
*T*M r i *7"TLC 5"T" . #
COES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO: INVOL% E AN UNREVIE'AED S AFETY CUESTION C YES y NO l BE SAFETY SIGNIFICANT C YES 3N . BY
;.A A N a s NM ,a rg APPROVED bG. '
3 -na ma g, ;att FomuC)3'2 C 32t:
l t FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) Services PUBLIC SERWCE COMPANY OF COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN NO.
/ M %T CX;T- 2, R O - 7._. '
PAGE /^[ / l CATEGORY l TYPE: O CN Overall C CN Submittal OCT-2aojo-L Are a!! measurable nonradiological effects of this activity Confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation) ,7! Yes C No State basis /h &~ A G )t)1 D J >$ con f/Lif-b '7b 7'Nf = ACCQ55 8dv AL&R *T H /- Ttig&UO- 5 U 11. h iA. 4 _ A D D T H f- f.f-A m 9 Et> > L D.]Al Q - is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmentalregulations? O Yes 5 No Applicable Regulations NOTE: if either ansner s Yes, the act:s ry does not envolve an ur'res ened enviror,mentalquestion. Sign and date the forrn If both ansners are No. the actvrVh3s t*e Cotent al for Creat,ng an un'es ened erWroMentalQuest'on. Compiere the remair'cer of thrs evaluation form. EVALUATION (Use additkiinal shestsif requires 0 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmenta! statement (FES) : Yes O No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed , 2. Determine whether or not the actrvity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the fol!owing guidehnes. (If tha answer to any of the fo! lowing questions is Yes, then this act!vity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant crange in tr e types. or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power !ev el) ~ Yes : No State basis (C) Does this tactivity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES) Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity involve an unreviewed ens;ronmental question) Z Yes : No f By - [ M Approved WJF WMf/ IME :.,
, :.ri s a.. . ..
l m.m m. .m _
4 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public SerVICO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of / Equ.pment Number (c,,glGi6 19 4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS _Ecurement Name ' n % , m ,; 4, e 0 & M Manual Equ'pn ert Locat:on G&d ev.w ag eCe- 6,e SSR No. j Inspection Tyce CC T NCR No. Work to be Performed fot#- g r w r"'c_ T CWP No. 86-/9a Other _CC T- J / Go - 1 CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT _ C AllB R ATED l IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION ITEMS NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE OC I i S i m p s ,t, i M 3fo% i ' 9,lT'7 ! 5'dfl 1 i i l l i I i i i i i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PL ACE OF MEASUREMENT i CRITERIA i A!F j Ait i OC J : p- ' i i . I _, . /' ' WA W
\
\ ' !
4 1 I i __/ ' I I ! I I I ! Verify Proper Material Control For Job. hst Applicable DC Numbers Below: i 1 , i i i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): E Stop Work Z NCR E CAE E Tagged Comments u .' vi C_t ,, .] flcL T* Ch ?c ' Cl 5ha*v 5 U I v, c c T 2 t cro << w < < Ce. f!sp. h y : y ,i a r 7-%wl l C L* r w c. g a ce..e g d f-ca . . - < / mot -i 9 9 n-m na .,yn/n M As. L'f'H zirs -r *Ajr/. <w J, &s,) 7 7 lW J 7 fs - 1 I
~
l i a i I 4 J
-i
_i 1 Inspectionist . Testtsi Completed Satisf actory. Edes Z No 4 if NO, emplain and reference apphcable documents in comment section. } l Inspected By badv Date I 'd "- 7 7 f ses.. e,::v w
FT 2190-2 Page 1 of 3
.' Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SerVlCO" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: LF FT O CCT O T-Test OCv/' P4 -/9 f Tf u-J"-ff Prepared By: % #-f-8 b Reviewed By: h[ %//. C. %
(Preparer) (Date) (LSupervi sor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: hleam,kMe-cal 6,cw- ,< r,-74 (QA Services) v (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No bhd (Nu ear Lic. - Oper .tions) N'h (Date) Sa fety/ Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: m 8/h 1468 /-ff- 8 7 (Teclinical de'rvices) (Date) PORCWRC 7 0 7 JAN 8- B87
~
PORC Review Required: / Yes / 7 No NFSC Review Required: /7 Yes /[No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: .u/ /M//~7 (Station Manager) (Date) Pe ssion to Initiate , ift p v r Date) Test Completed: t ._
, 'W > So
' Tiest Conif -* a / (Oste)
Ins'pection Completed: I _ e-/e V7 . (QA Services) ~ (Date) Supervisor Review: /b rN/#II. = /u/c 7 (Qepa tm fit uyervisor) (Date) Notification of Test ,, 7 h6-[O Completion and Results: ~v _# fSniftSupervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) reau ici m.v.zo
, FT-2190 Page 2 of 3 i
1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To verify correct operation of neuly installed XCR contacts required by the new Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System (SLRDIS). 2.0 PRECAUTIONS. LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results _____________________ i Other _______________________ 22 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/ CUP. 23 None i 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date
/
l 3.2 References _____________________________________________
FT-2190-2 Page 3 of 3 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 4.1 Department Approval t -___-__,___k__oh7 dlh 7 2-_ Dept . -S_ _u _p e r _v_i sDate or 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number -_-__ 43 Radiation Ucrk Permit Issued, if required: Number _ /!._ 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The falouing steps may be parformed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a QC hold point. 51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been QC revieued and are covered by this FT. List CUP WITNESS OR's reviewed: ___,,_ --__----_--_-______-_______ __,[h"-/f----,f, th, 4,
~
N R ___ , ,e J ,7,-- _J_-./-
-____ [p_/4. k_ ___-_ -_---_-----------_---_----_
^r .
-_-_/-}
Init. ate W IbTNESS U.r;T.jp.dv[/y .. .. . .L _ Verify that FT-2176-1 has been run in its No:cTcR entirety and successfully completed.
- _5_ - -
5.3 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3.1), include the FT W, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. g(--___ l s l l
gg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION C/llp///A! SGTVlC9,a PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF CCLCRAD3 CN/TCR/SCR/PC h NO.d7~- 2/90 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE /*M CATEGORY s TYPt: O CNOVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT 8 TESTREQUEST O TEMPORARYCONFIGURATION AEPORT C PROCEDURECHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLAS$4RCAT10M ARE THE SYSTIM(S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURla INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI 2 YES O NO ENGINEER ED SAFEGUARD 3 YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN N YES O NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM M YES C NO S AFETY R ELATED @ YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES M NO REMARKS S NS
- 1. DOES THl3 ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? N YES C NO .
UST THE APPUCARLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: [*~3*4 M SfC */O M Fli' uh db .* [ 2. 2 . I' .
/. 2. z. . M /. M S. /4'.6.Ar 2..Z. M 3. 6. 3 . / . /. 2 1 /o. 2 Y./. >. Q. 3 .
- 7. t.' . T. 2.'2 - T. 2. t . 7 2,' A . 2 . '9. W 'Q. / / ~9. JZ'. 16.1 & jn.'1 % . N LA 2. 2,
- 1 4! I.P. 4. Z / V. s . ). I 4. 8 . I V./d 1 4. 1). An_", A c_ E Gm*,s }2 pc .
x s.14,; ' A 1rs." 1). 11' 1 Dl 7se.G sp u's se umL9.* tes ' M y J *sn ' s.4 i
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGE(Si SE MACE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? U YES 3 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MACE:
- 3. CETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTivlTY INVCLVED IS AN UN A EVIEWED S AFETY CUEST;CN UTILIZ;NG THE FOLLOWING GuiCELINES:
(A) HAS THE PROBABIUTY OF OCCURRENCE CR THE CONSEOLENCES OF AN ACC: CENT CR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPYENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASEDP C YES M NO STATE BASIS: StC#- @ '2 d (8) H AS THE POSS181UTY OF AN ACCIDENT OR M ALFUNCTICN CF A CIFFERENT TY AE TW AN ANY EVALUATED paEV' U S t,Y IN THE FSAR SEEN CREATED? O YES % NO STATE B ASIS. f6f 24 d 4 2 2 (C) HAS THE MARGIN OF S AFETY. AS CEFiNED IN THE B ASIS FC A ANY TECwNtCAL SPEC lFiCATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN AECUCED? C YES N NO STATE SASIS O M As4e# M 2 O DCES THE ACTIVITY APPEAa. TO: INkOLN E AN UN AEV:EV.ED S AFEN OLESTICN VES y NO
==-'--"" BE S AFETY SIGN:FIC ANT C YES MN 84 ^ dd4M - APPAOVED
@t ^) !' '
;ci s ac..., - we yo. 7 ;
l Fom C 3M 3212
Ea.g 2 db 2.
'$h . /5s leo l- bu+~> s +< f}>+ trs o le y in s Ja -l &
h'c z $ $cae Sl kb/S wi L.L. r4c' t2/ M tv>%6U TH6- 8 AffR.oPnr2 M /!??c.)7- 5/4 N A L. is s'o?"Pl./ Gb . /g/a u 4 c pou>+r u, // 4 s esm o v+b sue.L.-hka./ >% + va./ue-s 4, H, +. , l cop ubOt- -yht sd w)*/l no l Y)d- 14rok &. N b/oop5 w:// be, r%+e<:/, s' spa <a+f , so Ahn m*. hop w.'//1s
+),6. ++ s,Gn
/vn e-/an a ) +b ea u Qv A .
s_}lsa-,st' de. 8,44s / cops w,*// be-5E. /he vsk +.s i lunc/s4nn/ -h4too oul- &btt rhas,-/5 VGnhing +h4-
,4pproprMs. ne:/vo.}an d ,%-
xchs'. o /ae a s w
-/As doig iA.u.f* c/ ,%e sysm .
l 3c. C>>e kep,,s+ 4 o? , ~ r// 4 e. p W G e. Ay &wbe. pa vw 4 .m. k h. >% M n/vm ) alw;
-/eo h g, It>sk fusedin ol -ks h a'o +.s nd Anpac rl sny surve.///w w rqvireww}s -JJ aGd i :
1 g 6da.u Q hw & I ~V 0
--w - - - - -
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION b
Public O$0rVICOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN / THE N ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. -2.9 0- 2.
PAGE lo[ /
CATEGORY TYP E: C CN Overall O CN Submittal N ~ M D[
Are all measurable nonradiciogical effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? )( Yes O No State basis )$. Cbn $14/f*b 'YD YNf* A C CQ $ 5 SwAV N&A; 'T Wf* "TTJ ACOf/LD@J & ))1 $ U./ & }A) Q J) D '9" & . (, T21R E U 1 L1l Lip Q .
Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes 9 No Applicable Regulations h0TE: 11 e ther a 'sser ges and date tre form it both a"ssers are No, the activ,'tv has the cotent al for Creat'ng an unres*esed eris troniner'tal Question. Como ete the remainder of thss evaluar on form.
EV UATI
- N (Use additionalsheetsif requiresS .
1. Is the act;vity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes O No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes : No State basis (B) '. Vill this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power level 7 Yes C No State basis i (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis l l l Does the activity invols e an vr' reviewed environmental quest,on? Z Yes : No By Approved Mwe U g
. ' b. . .
. .. n . - ~
i CCT- 2181-1 / Public
- FORT ST. VR AIN NUCLhAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 3
, (') SOrVlCO'" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: 4.7 FT Li.,7CCT C T-Test (CWP 86-288)
Prepared By: (Preparer) n -Af -G Reviewed By: [ow /o n w (Oate) ((jlupervisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: hencukebo d m+
~~
_16 WM, 4(QA Services) (Date) Safety /EnvironmentalhYes Evsluation Required: /7 No wni E, _ //- 7--86 Safety / Environmental
] (Ruclear,Lic.-Qsferations) (Date)
Evaluation Concurrence: /94t M w ~
//- /2 - %
(Technical Services) (Date)
~
PORC Review Required: /W Yes / 7 No PORC SC 7 0 0 NOV 1 8 1986 NFSC Review Required: O Yes 8 No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: y//~ ~ N//9/I4 (Station Manager) (Date) Pe ssion to Initiate M (Shift Supervisor) (Date) Test Completed: -
/6!T'/
(Test Conductor) (Date) Inspection Completed: . - .7//M/ ( Service ) ' (Oate) Supervisor Review: A 4 ~
/ Jds -f 7 (Department' Suphrvi sor) ~ O(Date) t nd R ts: ~
# ./ J '// - M (Shif t Sup rvisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review:
(T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) e mcim.n me
,J
,/
[
s .- i r 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 1.1 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. . 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ___E'____________ Operations ______---_----____ Results ___-_____ ___. _____. Other ___-__-____________-___ 22 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. 2.3 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3.1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date
, ikk$
_ dl 72_r i ._' L *! ' " _ _ ..._ - _- -_ _ ._ _- - _ _ ..:___-_________ 9.l Lt.it _ __ ?l-.$_ {k -__--__ _ $_'_N_ $_b -.____ 3 2 References -___________________--_---__---_________-____ d.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 41 Department Approval /..1/ h _ _ _ _ _ c - _ _7c;- _ _ -- _ _ _ _ / 3:3! - f' Dept. Suoervisor Cate 4.2 Mech /El ec Cl e arance Isived, if required: Number _@ @- 4.3 Ra.n ation ucre Permit Issues. ir ceautree: number 180__ 5.0 PROCEDURE
/
4 5.i All DR' s to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP GR's revieued: _________________________________ ITNES - go,g7 mg..j 7 _ _ _ _t_ _$_ _# 2_ _9_ _8_' k_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ INSPE
$8S l2-lf-N
/ TNESS InIII" Daie"~
-----.r... Check all cables for proper terminations per IN W on v iring diagram &.
_h{fkf'_ is $4 Elec. Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall N$ i *fgT d/ /ff17[53 It4SPECT08 include uirins. both internal and external panel _ _ _ _ _ _ J2
- 23 ~ C6 Elec.
5.4 Check schematic drawings for functions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent ///sf operation of other energized equipment. _$__b.S ta-23-S(,
/ Elec.
n_ yslTNESS 5.5 during circuit check, all contacts and
-0 INT _d8 conductors must be verified by closing.
0" f)) blocking or continuity check as the case may be. 3 _ _ _ _ _ _14 ~23- Id Elec. 5.6 Uhere virins and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria, the appropriate organization will be notified of the discrepency and correctic, made before continuation of the CCT. e J _ _ _ _ _ _ _l 2 $ < Elec. 5.7 Make a copy of the Test Eauipment Sec' tion (3 1). include the CCTe. and send it to the Results En-;1 n e e r i n g Superviser. If nc test ecuiament is used. N/A inis step. p E!?
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OSerVlCOw PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC R No.cc T-2161-SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE _ //f CATEGORY - s TYPE: C CNOVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT TEST REQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE IFSARI C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED.OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI YES C NO ENGiNF ERED S AFEGUARD I YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN ' YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
'YES C NO S AF ETY RELATE D YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM YES kNO REMARKS
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT. TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FS AR OR TECH SPECS?
kYES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED:M[ L% ._.t. I U4 f T ._O_ 7 h MN g la d le h y,% 9,7) p C. f_ n Q ,J [C)l lfpg,gl}g N f 2 T LY 4 f+0.l; '2;3; L Ll ;t5.19 [~LQ y . g,$9, ,
/
T. .SM17. 1 A d. 7. IM . M M./ . 8/.Q _ Y.[O. 5 4, t / 5.lo. 4. s. 7. */ . 's. 7. 7l9
~
<; g
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGE(S) BE M ADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEChkNO C YES L:ST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE.
- 3. DETERYlNE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY OUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES.
(A) HAS THE PROBABlJTY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR mal, FUNCTION OF EQUlPMENT IMPORTANT TO S AFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED) YES NO STATE B ASIS ghh h c. e_Md r her hexN M N_b M no$ ffMR O L% . h d3 'iq, b_1 b nM 9_d U n_ di e@C c w #* apc.caSAsn-1 CL-4.by b g y 111 tB) H AS THE POSSIBILITY ' J ACCIDENT OR M A FUNCTION OF A OtFFERENT TYPE TH AN ANY EVALU ATED PREVIOUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN Cl .TEDP C YES NO STATE B ASIS _._[Xt_.3 M . tC) H AS THE MARG lN OF S AFETY, AS DEFINtD !N THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFIC ATION OR IN THE FS AR BEEN REDUCED 7 l C YES % NO STATE B ASIS _Iff._.3A l l l l DOES THE ACTIVITY APPE AR TO INVOLVE AN UNREVIEW ED SAFETY QUESTION C YES kNO tE S AFETY SIGNIFIC ANT C YES M NO /p l BY_ _ $[ 4 aat.at hig i
& APPROVED 1 w
- H f r!-
> umat-
&'d !T #E v r: q nc
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerylCO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLCRADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN /h TR NO. _?_q.-21SI-I PAGE I+8 l CATEGORY TY F'E: C CN Overall C CN Submittal 6 3d U_e,.5 Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? K Yes C No State basis _t.d h b c vh Md h l
Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? C Yes kNo Applicable Regulations h0 TE 11e trer a~sser os Yes. t"e actvtv does not <nsci.e an unres esed envoronerentalquest on. Sgn anc care the form. It tcts ansse*s are No. the JCivty has the potent al f r Creating an /res e6ed ens tron!"entalQuest on. Cor"c?*!* the rema nder of th s esa!uat on form EVALUATION (Use additionalsheetsif required) 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No i Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? l Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity insolved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines. ;
(if the answer to any of the following quest:ons is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Wiii tNs activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? C Yes No State basis fB) Will this activity result in a significant change in the t) pes, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a ( significant increase in the authorized po Aer level? Z Yes : No State basis tC) Does th1s actmtv ir.volve an environmental matter rot previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES) Z Yes Z No State basis l i Does the actmty invols e an unreviewed environ' mental quest'on) Z Yes Z No By [ c 4x Approved ?as eA_n..., we h d, [_ u.. . .., hffs(6(a_ 1
, ,~' 443'. *'
l a 1
t FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
'j S'^rylC(y PUBLIC SERVICE CZMPANY CF CCLCRADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of _[_
Ecu:pment Numoer tl\/ '2. 7 2 / , 2. 231 7 l'L_t4[# d21~ lS3 F V- 22 *V REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eau >pment Name 1/ rhtt o w .5 0 & M Manual A/ A Equ pment locat'on I" E iv rfo L i
/{O6 N SSR No. NA Inspect on Tsce 6-Q NCR No.
Werk to be Performed SEC h CZ_'u.) CWP No. 8I - 2 P f' otner 5% - 2. f9 CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT g c c_ 7 - 2. / Q / - / CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION C ALIB R ATION QC -CCI ~ '2' I # ' L~
- ITEMS NUMBER EXPIR ATIOtj DATE j}g_fG-) Ff-A i
NAQA y t.h y/^ ; P //Lr,/M 3
,j
/
N i i X Ni i / i N ~ i / i i i / I DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT i CRITERIA j A/F i A/L i QC x i N et p 3 l i n-/ n 1 < < / N i ! i / N i i i / t N l ! i / i NI i l / i A i / ' i N I / l i i N ; .- ; 1 Verif y Proper Material Control For Job. List Apphcable DC Numbers Below: t i ! I Quahty Control Actions Utthred (Ct eck): O Stop Work C NCR C CAR C Tagged Commeg'( Ct r 1) f/ - / 4 7 0 (/ 0 f - 0V % % % C h y_L_.k' c)F Al, L 7~U Y 0 L' &c@7 7~d - & c ? [b '/ C 2 - O l' vSS / kt'IYh 5'! L} b ~ 0C ? _T'5t$6 b(.O W N 2 N- # b O 5_~ ] [e N lA$ $.T.C .
/' ? 4. ., bt- 'h c t', s ~, . 7 _?. 6: ~ACM E~ -/Y C G]O/ " 1
/ _qf% f. 2.-
.s hig:L,6i oF h5 ~7s 5m u. 67) ew c w/2_85 - 4 D !
f _ 5a REpr'r eJ w///r/M ? % 4 , - PATED ll/ig/8 7. f
.{ I
}
Q CFGYL TD C ea [' 2 C - 2 9 2 l= /?- A T,c% S11 % ) af 78 Ea7, j t _Kv' T 7-e_yt,/ e e zf9 edu/ Wyn a,. a_,accr-r_cw,JJn .nw .ra m.+ w~<-~ ~ i gr (l-aaf& 2* wJ/' ry ry_.GC / c c 7~ 2C.- - , a i a.
/ .
hngectients] ; Testis) Completed Sataf actory. T Yes # No j i af No e ora.n and reference apphcable documents in comment section. Inspected By L U. - k Cate \ o ., , n = w .
i a FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
$3ryl cot PUCLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLCRADS QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of (
Ecurpment Number H t/. M o 1 3 9 D 3' _1.14 ' l . 2 2 C3' _ 2 3 4 3. f V- 2M REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecurement Name (/3r;ov'S 0 & M Manuai _. //4 Equtmer t location C d/o l ((oo & SSR No. //fe inscect on Tvoe 70 .'. NCR No. Ud Work to be Performed ( .gj kb t'IO w CWP No. MN< other C CT A l 0 l
- I CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT C AllB R ATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB R ATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC
$in ses eleier i M - 9 Uf ! F-O L 8..
I I f i I i l i i i t I i l j DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREYENT i CRITE RI A i A/F j A/L i QC _ I i s' I l I i k/ 6
.. ./" _ $f Uy[G l 1
_/ / 1 i f'~ : ! i i f i i i t
/ i l i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Apphcable DC Numbers Below:
Y& h f- lk.) A$ 6 l Quality O'ontrol Actions Utilized p (Che[c ':MStop pg \,Vork L.__ LJ NCR , , C CAR _ Tagged Comments Pn h Cc T 2Ill.i he ALev< h hl ET++S fer l-ore < A c & w: L 4' nt s On< ', k s # l +b i o *2D x< s+qc.
~ ~
p or P!TR . _ l T.t< J N - tva i 6 - t< r ai a f< / et p e ut T(5 / A o / - P 2 . 1 pie , p r. f T"~8 I a o I. G 4 Us ek to hi<e new I D. p,h e r d er
.~ .e < if Relw C2 - n o C 3 th w TD. %, s ke a ld r slecT cqw fe cal _dtn n #fS wir&
x rt u *.M Jrre eoa.32 fr e. Tri I ;1 c a ~ %c ti < a de keTu te hue s.,,txf n e
,t
-v .
p't O ,al,re) an, w u <. 8,, n .K< l. 4 (A . I ? I . IG Ns~ 1 d.1. sk e J Ja ef t;,-t o pi c s .1.e s .t ) cla s h n w n e. w I Tb f n\ Y ($. ? fla T N L 24 H f W h b > rr ? U t ~5f t '. N r)N s r 1nC I Crt tNeY ha, e cf ,1. D f' Yft t l L sJ
~
/
(( 0 3 Wb N(h h E. j A
. . . > I A f b l
l NH r T k a a- lT's..s . c k r {s.1)e w te e C 2 i; d a do u
/
1 l
)
4 [ }[h 1s'<f th!- _rLW ~ #y
.~ r,'Y=//*7 d.- l l vh l-w Y f?" - 217;-? ,.yL_ P k/ wpp
,~ D /
I l Inscettiontsi/ Nest (s) Completed Satisf actory. # Yes Z No b emplaiAwetgence pggabie doc aments in comment section. Inspected By 5 %, Date 3 _ c-,~.,, . oi e o
, FT 2181-1 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
[ } SOrylCO'" PUBLIC SERVICE C$MPANY CF COLCRAD3 s TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: LT/ FT O CCT O T-Test (CWP 86-288) Prepared By: 4. " -N f6 Reviewed By: .- ro..so w (Preparer) (Date) Supervisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: 9iectodekwd be se - 24 16 V (QA Services) (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No // A e A //-7dd (NuclearLic.-fgerations) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: M/M M d4/ //- /2 -8N (Tecnnical Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: $ Yes O No PORCBC 7 0 0 NOV 18 1986 NFSC Review Required: / 7 Yes /W No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: MI d </[9//4 ( ation .anager) (Date) ssion to Initiate g, ser ( ate Test Completed: d$ j 5MN
/ (Oste)
' ' (Tes't Toncuctor)
Inspection Completed: sN# < P% V7 (QA Services) (Date) Superviser Review: //d _/.,//4 7/)/r7 (TAiparte t' fupervisor) (Date) Notification of Test l , Completion and Results: / n 9 3 -/7 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic, - Operations) (Date) l 70mM 4C13'2..*2 3H3
o 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To verify correct placement and operation of valve actuator XCR contacts installed under SLROIS er, 1;;; . Bs io-t+ 40 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS. AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support i Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Resu'ts ___________P_________ Other _______________________ 2.2 Notifv Technical Services of any te'st/experimert procedure : changes uhich could affect plant operating procedures coor. conpietion of the CN/ CUP. ; 25 None i 3.0 PREREQUISITES - 3 1 Test Ecolpment t Las: s i l b e r. ; c e ! t'ame Identification No. Date ; _____ ^/_/_ _ _ _F_'_ _ _ ____________________ ________________ i
'i l
l 2.2 Fe'erences _____________________________________________ l h ( I i [ t i f
A y o--. ---u -
-- + , - - >+- - c
. t
- f i
t jjAt . 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS : 41 Department Approval _" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 33 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _fa/ 7 ! a Dept. Supervisor Date i i I 4.2 Nech/Elec Clearance Issued. if required: Number _4 d. 43 Radiation Ucrk Permit Issued. if required Number _& 1. 1 5.0 PROCEDURE 1 NOTE: The folouing steps may be performed in any order as I long as they are functionally sequential and to not , bypass a QC helo point. 51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been f revtewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP OR's reviewed: _________________________________ !
/ TNESS POINT .&ggM , _ _ _ _ _g/ M_ _"JO((, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,, _
lNSPECTOR ________________________________________________ t Y_ _ _ / _t @_ Init. D-te j' Ver{ v that all FT's f orcompleted. CN 0176 have been
'" T -
in3pge7 g h&performedandsuccessfully , l l 5.3 Make a cope of the Test Equipment Section (3 1). in.lude the FT #. and send it to the Results Engineerin; Supervisor. If no test equipment A i is used. N/A this step. Ai t t I ' h [ i t h i f
4 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPAfBY OF COLORADO CN TCR SCR PC h 1
) SerVICOw NO.FT-2181-I SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE 1 Of I CATEGORY TYSE:
2 CN O\ERALL [ CN SUBYiTTA' [ SETPOP4T CH ANGE REPORT [ TEST RE AEST 2 TEYPCR ARY CC'.F1GUR AT.ON REPORT 2 PROCEDJAE CHAP.GE rFS AR) E OTH[R j CL ACSIFIC ATION: ARE THE SYSTEMIS) EQUIPMEN) OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED.OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: u434 CLASSI 7 YES C NO ENGP.E ER EO S AF EGU AR D XYES 0 S A F E S W U T DOV'. N f y r,$ [ NO PL ANT PROTECTIN E SYSTE'.i A YES u.. '. 0 SAFETY REL ATED A YES ._ N O SECURIT Y SY $7E*.i (_ , yt$ [ NO REYARKS _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
; EVALUADON .
., Use Adadenal Sheete if Requked ' ' .
1 DCES TMS ACTitlTY AFFECT STRUCTL AES SY STEYS CCYPC'.ENTS EQUIPYENT, TESTS. EXPER:YENTS OR PROCE ARES CESCR BED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS' 2 YES [ NC uST THE APPuC ABLE SECTIONS REoE.'.F This te_st verifies _ completion of FTs from CN_2176. In i t sel f i t does n ' t a f fec t 'Af+D4y-9 ny__sy_s tem o r equ i pme n t S . ee SE for FT-2176 for , any_ applicable sections.
- C CCES THE ACTitlTY REQU'RE TH AT CH ANGEtS) BE Y ACE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC) U YES 1 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHA' GES TO BE VADE i
l l
^
l 3 C E'E A Y NE '.'.sE THE R OR NOT THE ACTi'.1TY INVCL% ED 'S AN UNREVtEn ED S AFET v QUESTiCN UT!UZA3 THE FCLLC.'. '.G SL tCE L9.FS
'A' H AS THE PRCB A6'uTY CF OCOLRRENCE CR THE CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCrDENT OR Y ALFU'.CTiON CF E L JUE' T YPCRTA'.T TO S AFETY PAEVTUSLY EV ALU ATED tN THE FS AR BtEN INCRE ASED' N3*ds Z YES 3 ?.0 STATE BAe5 This test only_ checks _to_see_if_6 Other tests are._ completed and in itself wf,1 not_ test any_ system or component. Therefore no
_ab. normal modeof_ operation ic created and there is nn a'fect on any_ margin of safety _ in the FSAR or T.S. i 9 w AS 'sE POSSIE:uTY CF AN ACDOE'.T C A Y ALFUNCT.CN CF A DiFFE AENT TY PE TH AN ANY Ei ALU ATEC 3:E . A S.v lN 'WE F S A R E E E'. Cc E ATE D' E NES 3 NO STATE BASS _See JA._._ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ . _ C - A S '-E Y A A G:N CF S AF ET < AS DEF.' E D N T"E B AS S FO A ANY 'ECHYC AL SPEC'F'C AT'CN OR IN THE F S A: S E E'. A E CUCE D' l Z .tS 3 No S' ATE B ASIS _See. 3A. l l l T-~GE-T - , A r p t A R 'O - P.'. C L . E A N L ', A E i E .'. E D S A r E ' r C L E S TI O N _ YES d. *.O BE SAFETY StGN F CANT 2 YES (* A
- 3. Aff/t./m -.
u . G . s c. __ An,RCseo os.#._g_"
> .- -t
_._&&M I
...___--.____.____-_-.m - _- r- wm--,s _
F RT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public 9 SerylCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i CN / T FT- TR l ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. T-2181-1 PAGE 1 of 1 I CATEGORY Test Request TYPE: C CN Overall Z CN Submittal h Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to he on. site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? D Yes No State basis All effects of this test will be confined to the plant. .1 I Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? C Yes No j Applicable Regulations NO TE If e trer ansaer :s Yes. the scr+tv does not reso%e an unrev esed env ronr~entas avest cn S gn and date the form 11toth ansaers are No. the act v.tv has the corent at for creating an unres =esed envronmental aaestion Comnete the remainder of tns avaivat on form j EVALUATION (Use edditionalsheetsif requires 0 i 1. l Is the activity identified in the final environmen al statement (FES) Yes O No l Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q.3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed I l
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreuewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes. then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental Question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis
- 2 (8) Will this activity result in a significant change in the tyoes, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents. or a significant increase in the authorized power ies ep ~ Yes Z No State basis l
I (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basts _ Does the actiutv avoh.e an unreviewed environmental quest On) T Yes Z No t By W _ Approved .f Mf _[/_Nd., d-
.- - .- ,zC ~ .
2 . .m.
FORT ST. VR AIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC SerVlCO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page of Eqwoment Number /1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecu ement Name / 0 6 M Manual Equ'ement Location V . SSR No. Inscection Type ghrf4 j 1 _. NCR No. Work to be Perforreed //v6 CWP No. _f/ - 3/7 Other #12/M-/ CAllDRATED EQUIPMENT CAllBRATED IDENTIFICAllON l CAllBRATION OC - ITEN NUMBER ! EXPIRATION DATE
'9, ' l l l
/ i i !
/ - i l l
f/ I l Y ( \ DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT , CRITERIA I A/F i A/L l OC e i j t i i j
/ l ! !
t i I i
^
/
/ i i i '
((/ l t 1 i p' i i l Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: I ! ! I l Quality Control Actions Utileed tCheckh C Stop Work C NCR O CAR [ Tagged Comments - - - _ j hj&&W ,/> Nirke f W ? 17l N7'A/Sl#/ hWb&*_ i {' -
~
s I / c h A n a te.c- h > &/ u I
~1 i
I fI ( instlectiontsi / Testistrompleted 3atisf actory [ Yes Z No TrNnwamTmf ref erence appi cab!e documents in comment section inspected By M(twu Date , A wser:=,w
CCT- 2181-2
,,f Pub llC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 3 g) SOfVlCCf* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF COLCRAW q
i TITLE: TEST CCNTF.0L FCRV. I l Type: O FT O CCT O T-Test (iP 86-289) Prepared By: A (Preparer) N -20 J6 Reviewed By: (1/% f. 35.g (Oate) (JSupervisor) (0 ate) Review / Concurrence: hvor, ,04... .; he w , e . , 4 ,. ( (QA Services)* (Date) Safety / Environmental 4' Yes Evaluation Required: O No na L ._ # ./_/; 7-86_ (NuclearLic.-OrsraticQ, (0 ate) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: If41Mfv .// /? - 6 9 (Technical Services) (Datel PORC Review Required: ,/2/Yes O No PORyg80 7 0 0 NOV 18' l986 NFSC Review Required: O Y6. 6 No NFSC #: . Authorized for Use: MI /k ~ ////7 / ^ "'\ (~ Station Manager) (Oste) . ssion to Initiate ,'yJg g,g , Shift Superv)sor) ~~ ~~IDate) Test Completed: sA Gbh _',p 6 - 2 7 (l'est Conductor) (Dace) Inspection Completed: A d_.s._3 M k - -
/~ /6, - T'7 4 (QA S,ervices) (0 ate)
Supervisor Review: 1Mh /~ / C ~ @ gepartmentSupirvisorJ'~ (Datt) Notification of Test / Completion and Results: d,ff /kh l- /-f7
/ShiftSupervisor) ~~104te) 10 CFR 50.59 Review:
(i-Testonly) 'fNuclearLic.7 Operatio Q ~ ~[0 ate) FCRM IC4 F2 22 3643 m - -
,,vv. m4v4 -u .e,2 . w. e t.
1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of instc11ation prior to executing FT. - 2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support E l e c t r i c i a n s __F' _____________ Operations __________________ Results _____________________ Other __________ ____________ 2.2 This Cold' Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a
.hange Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required.
23 None 3 0 PREREGUISITES 3.1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date _YNAL%$c__.___ __N___EE}_ ________ _ _tEt_$_b _-_____ 3.2 References ________________________________________ ____ a.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 41 Decartment Aparaval _ _____ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _M _ _ _ _-2 2 -86 Dep*. Su..rvisor Oa e 4.2 Psch,'El+c Clearance *ssued. if required: Number ____ 4.3 03.:.stion Ucrk Permi+ Issued, if reauired: Number _____ 5.0 PROCECURE L- __ _ _ _
~~ ,?
51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been revieued and are covered by this FT. List CUP QC DR's revieued: _________________________________ O NT T.b./. M 87 ___ _b'[____!_Y____ INSPECTOR _S_k_S__/_'tE?_~E 2C Init. Date O Check all cables for proper terminationb per //ITNESS ['in og' }j virin9 diagrams. fgf f2-2r-Jc Elec. GC 53 Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall i NT fd.b..ll. [$7 rin9 INSPECTOR g [ fz.25-81 Elec. 5.4 Check schematic drawings for functions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of other energi:ed equipment. f/f
.gp
_ ------i z - z i- C L Elec. 3C Durina check, and Je:TNE55 3C NT 8dfECOR I.5 conductors circuit must be verified by all contacts closing,
, lNS blocking or continuity check as the case may
> $] be. 3 _S Elec.
56 Uhere viring and contact arrangements de not meet CN criteria, ' the appropriate organi:stion uill be notified of the discrepency and correction made beto.e continuation of the CCT. gg ,
,gg Elec.
5.7 Make a copy of tne Test Eautoment Section (3.1). include the CCT#. and send it to the Results Engineering Supersisor. If no test equiement is use:. N/A this step. W
PubilC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC P
') SerVICG v NO.CCT-g/GI-CATEGORY' SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE
_/[ TYPE: O CNOVERALL CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT k TEST REQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEMIS) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI YES O NO ENGINEERED S AFEGUARD YES U NO SAFE SHUTDOWN YES O NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM ' YES U NO SAFETY RELATEO , YES U NO SECURITY SYSTEM O YeS % NO REVARKS EVALUATION _ _ Ude Additional Sheets if Required.
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? hYES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: FSAg s1ct . *. t . 2 .t , T . e . 4.1. t , 4, g_(,4(,g A 4 , 7.1A L'. 9.1 leal c L u+ T_ . 14 a' ~.s' 'Clo. fi> ' App,./hs BD .T 2 r f f 2. ,. $,. i s', i9 ' 2o,.
9.7)d. .' zA ' ' ~ '
' ~ ' '
"T* S
- L c 0 4 . 2 . i,*t. d. *!. I A . L/.4.] . '/. f I tl./O. Ll
- 5. Li . t ,'s. lo. 4. 6. 7. */ 's.1 7,'9 Ut
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGEIS) BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPECh YES kNO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
l
- 3. DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE AC'.IVITY INVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION UTILIZlNG THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES.
(A) HAS THE PROB ABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATEDIN THE FSAR BEEN INCREASED? U YES NO STATE BASIS:M '. s Is e r_ a!rl t hAht"M ked Ob (A[ h n o$ iter t>i t t b op 'eo b au sudem e ac.l i.d U n at cM3 C ct 1,' ; ha Gs; < 31 f t ns u t t '. n n f t \ {cE J *n a g e e ed \ w . l l (B) HAS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MA{ FUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREViOUSLY l IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? C YES 4 NO STATE BASIS._ hT e 3N (C) H AS THE MARGIN OF S AFETY. AS CEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNIC AL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REDUCED) U YES [ NO STATE BASIS: [ce 'T A DOES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO-. INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUFSTION U YES [ NO By - PPROVED - M_If.8. m .. . 7
! .72 Form 'C) 3?; C2 3382
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i Public , I
- j SerVICO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO f CN /M N ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. C. C T- EISI- E l PAGE /o' I
' ~
CATEGORY . TYPE: C CN Overall C CN Submittal 6 Tesh E 6$Q.1,5 Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? )(Yes C No State basis llN a u$h b c ujb b EILS[ 1 S. dd . V I l [ l is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? E Yes )(No Applicable Regulations NoiE: If erther answer is Yes, rhe actmty does not ins olve an unrevesed environmentalquest,on S'gn ar.: Jate the form. If both anssers a?e No, the actvtv has the potertial for crest.ng an ur;revesed envronmentalovestion. Compiere the remaonder of this eva'uation forrn EVALUATION (Useadditionalsheetsif required) 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No Or Suppiementarv Environmental Documents (See 0-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed l
- 2. Determi.ie whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed envircnmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this advity involves an unreviewed environmental l question.) (A! Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environrrental impact previously evaluated in the FES) Yes Z No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power leveP Z Yes : No State basis (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity involve an unrevtewed environmental question) Z Yes Z No Byg Iu,fris4 s navi I ' fe .hIg2_
- i Acproved - 4LfAs .
f.avi k ' 2._i e
'Ch*' , J 7. 24 4 3'O VJ -n, . ~ - - , , - .e_ , . , _ - . . , - , - - - - - - - , - .-..-- - - .- ---- --- -
4 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerylCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page ! of [
Equipment Number // V 120/. 2 lo 3 , ,2 2 V/ 2 2f3 E V - 12 05' REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
/ N Equipment Name VM ,, v,4 # / '
O & M Manual Equipment Locat:on CofuTTcL /24 C m SSR No. A 4 Insoect'on Type 6~5) NCR No. Aed Work to be Performed ' SEr~ b #/.ib) CWP No. b d --2 f 9 Other CCT-E/@'O CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT g /{ - F4 -2 P fA, CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC K NOhvN l l !: l ? ? /
)I'~! /
N. I i / l
'N / I N / I N
l l/ l DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA _ l A/F A/L l QC x i M Sk8 il//r/ML f3 !/ N I v !' ' P4 ///i/s / /
\ ! I / I N i I / I N i V i N / i
!N i
/ i i N i i i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
i I I i i i Quahty Control Actions Utilized (Check): E Stop Work C NCR C CAR C Tagged Comments C C T - O/ 7/- L l l N e h lGM s l W Tt3 k ,'7 %cL MocW LahnED C, e % -A', Sh.~uo /W Go3 ? b
$9'a I
/)fYL E I Q a 9 ^ A-A.
I A W $' . l_ l ? If J' % o!/ ,% 2 /,/1.0 fc'y
% m c.wp ac agt u o < s,s ,, ru,. o= rg.?o ,
l 1 l 1 i ( 1 n l {6 cec ~iion(su/ Testis) Completed Satisf actory. Z Yes ~V No if NO. explain anr1 reference applicable documents in comment section. , , inspected By W "k Date n., . m mw v
I FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public , ) SOTVICOt PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page ,/ of ! Eavpment Number R \/ -M OA xi oy 2, 43 'n W 33no FV.'30DD REFERENCE DOCU ENTS b/ 3 c., O t/3 , ' ' IA Ecuipment Name ' O & M Manual Equ;pment Location C e,ste e { f< O D A SSR No. MF inspect:on Type E@ NCR No. N Work to be Performed Si# D e f r) h/ 0Cf L/7/- L CWP No. f/' Other C- (T. 3 I 8I -3 CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT e Af ') i f / ' CAUBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB R ATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC
$' ,+ nco t he *e .M W8T S' D l W i ig~
l l I I I I t I DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA j A/F i A/L I QC l t i i / I I l j i .. I L -- i F ' MA -
. i >
f I LF d .3 M 6 l j
/ I / I i i
/ I i i i f I i i i verifv Drogar Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
t/A M/- Q.33 f6 I I i i Quahty Control Actions Util zed (Qh ck)AI 4 E StopWork jf' .) U NCR C CAR E Tagged Comments PW Ogs C C T Og e > l. , v e -t#mi Isehotm2) red: u; . % ch< c { Cor us : /: n<
1 s P -e t' PtrR c+n~# a th L 2n.
Pe re <4 i3 H - "t3 ; u FA< < m n d <l +', o Tl\ - 4 01 -9 s~ h . Tis - W t- 6 (,
as,h%w fo t>< d ce D 06 .1 (3) te r -e m it n -e w c ula te enJ 3esi,ni+:en. ..
r' / (R .i eJ4 - Wi / 4 'e c ie r .n i o it ed f'e em T'(3' 4 0 2 ,3 s/, T o 76 - c/ O 2 31 n< I c /1 - 16 2 l ts (4 J 1a e 4 / < c-f' o -< '
e,y p n t 'i r e a cl % Qr nst=~.
. s i A ll e rl < - Uls onIor v2 w n e m h s f s c %,
l'c us e '~ d FT~ 2 /2 C -/, c y L /c., J 'T _f//sl H A . d' -os n-u?n .y sk. M M ,/e,2 -
, /
(nsoectionts(/ testLvCampleted Satisf actory. ~^ "[es Z No
- 50. ew niriMreferedce r applicable doyuments in comment section.
Inspected By . t t % Date / -) . bb ecm.e x: = w yi e
I FT- 2131-2 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
) SerVlCe* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO b
TITLE 1 TEST CONTROL FORM Type: /_F FT O CCT O T-Test (CWP 86-289)
.; g // -// -f6 Reviewed By:
Prepared By: SAf - h /o.Ac p( (Preparer) (Date) (3upervi sor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: be,ehAhms,)6A% to-so pG U (QA Services) (Date) i Safety / Environmental
$Yes Evaluation Required: O No hsa De- //- 7-fg (tfucl' ear Lic. - Operdtions) (Date)
Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 6fdMel6v //- 7 2 -8
, (Technical Services) (Date)
PORC Review Required: 8 Yes O No PORN.Rc 7 0 0 NOV 18 1986 NFSC Review Required: O Yes & No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: /I_ // f[98 (Station M nager) (Date)
. Permission to Initiate '/ -
Test: /4 - h ' M 8~7
'g r -
r ( ate)'
' Test Corpleted: .-
D #7
' "(Te st CoMuc* r / (0 .e)'
~ 1/e/n f' Inspection Completed: (QA Services) ' (Date')
Supervisor Review: hb[ //b t /b' ( 0(pa r* rryht "%pe rvi sor) (Date) Notification of Test Completion and Results: X jON - Shift Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) FORMIC 1372 22 36&3
g el-21ci-J rage e or c 0 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 1.1 To verify correct placement and operation of valve actuator XCR contacts installed under SLRDIS e, 'c;; 1. -
.f?S I o ' t + -G 6 2.0 PRECAUTIONS,-LIMITATIONS AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for FT.
P = Primary Responsibility S: Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results ___________P_________ Other _______________________ 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/ CUP. 2.3 None 3 0 PREREQUISITES 3.1 Test Equipment Last Call: ration Hame Identification No. Date V 3 2 Re'erences _____________________________________________ l l i l
d.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 7 jv 4.1 Department Approval ___ _ _____ _ _/.'f_Date f _ _(( Oep Supervisor 42 Nech/Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number _____
'4.3 Radiation Work Permit Issued, if required: Number _____
5 0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The foloving steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a GC hold point. 51 All OR's to the C!JP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR's reviewed: _________________________________
\ / TNESS _______ __ _~ _
PCINTINSFECTOR h_$?ll7 ________________________________________________
'26_ _ _ / _3 _* A7 Init. Date
., n,3 *2
.. Verify that all FT's f or CN 2176 have been
- CINT c - .8/#/j/ n e r f o rme d a n d s u c c e s s f u l l y completed.
INSPECTCR _ Y _f 53 Nake a copy of the Test Equipment section (3.1). l include the FT #. and send it to the Results l l l Engineering Supervisor. If no tes* e:uipment is used. N/A this step. j 4 l l l
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CNITCR/SCRIPC.@
) SerVlCO' NO. FT-2181 2.
SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE 1 of 1 CATEGORY , TYPE: C CN OVERALL U CN SUBMITTAL U SE rPOINT CHANGE REPGkT II TEST REQUEST 2 TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT U PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES lNVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT p CLASSI d YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD k YES % NO S AFE SHUTDOWN YES U NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEY d YES LJ NO S AFETY RELATED [_YES U NO SECURITY SYSTEM [ YES d NO REVARKS __ 1 DCES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS. COVpONENTS. EQUf PMENT TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCR; BED IN THE FSAR CR TECH SPECS) L YES L NO uST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS AEVIEv c- This test verifies c_oppletion of FTs from CN 2176. In itself it doesn't affect any system or eouioment. See SE for FT-2176 for any_ applicable sections. l i l 1 2 CCES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE TH AT CHANGEISI BE M ADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC) [ YES 1 NO LIST SECT lONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE l 3 CETERY:NE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN U'. REVIEWED S AFETY OUEST3ON UTILIZING THE FOLLCWING GUtCELINES. Ai HAS THE DROB ABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION CF EQUlPVENT lYPCRTANT TO S ACETY PRE \ICUSLY EVALUATEDIN THE FSAR BEEN INCREASEO? /gd/4 *J6 2-s 3 NO STATE B ASIS This test only checks to see if eM other tests are comwted and in itSelf will not test any systam or comoonent. Therefore no _6bno_rmala.mdeo_f cperation is created and there is no affect on any margin of Safety _ in the FSAR or T.S. l -. 1 l l B' HAS THE POSSIS!LtTY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A CiFFERENT TYPE TH AN ANY EVALUATED PAEtICUSLY l N THE SS AR BEEN CRE ATED' 2 YES 3 NO STATE B ASIS _See 34. C' - AS THE VAPG'N Cc S AFETY AS CEFtNED tN THE B AS'S FCR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATlCN ORIN THE ES AR BEEN aECUCED' , 2 3ES 3 NO STATE B ASIS See 3A. _ DCES ~~E ACTWITY APPE AA TO M OLVE AN UNREViEV.ED SAFETY QUESTION 2 YES 11 NO BE SAFETY SIGN'F C ANT 2 YES ens 4 3 M efl - //_-[i .f[r APPROVED I d2(fr/L ._._ ~_ ~~ -
- ., - n. ,
Mf.__ i
=a e
f e FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
) SerVICet CN / Tm FT- TR ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. -2181-A-PAGE 1 Of I
;A CATGGORY s - ; ..
TY PE: E CN Overall E CN Submittal g Test Request Are all measurab!e nonradiological effects af this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construpo,pgprevious plant operation? *3Yes _ O No State basis All/'effectsofthistestwillbeconfinedtotheplant, is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? 2 Yes f No Applicable Regulations h 0TE: erther ar'sser is Yes. the a:tivoty does not ins o% e an ur'rev esed enveronr"ental question. S?gn and date the form. If both anssers a e No. the actw:ty has the pctent al for creat.ng an unrev.esed environmentalavest on. Compiete the remarncer of th.s evakar on form. EVALUATION (Use additionalsheetsif 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the foltowing guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Yes : No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power leveP ~ Yes : No State basis (C) Does this activity involve an env.ronmenta' matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES' Z Yes Z No State bas:s Does the activity involve an unreviewed environmental quest en? Z Yes Z No By_ [ . 4. g o / -
.. I' ! .. h_.
=
Approved __ f_ m .. ..
. ,Me JI_ ., I V.
6 O E '.' . J G .'4 43 ? J
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
, $0rVICOE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page of Equipment Number /v/A REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eampment Name 'l ' 0 Er M Manual Equ pment Location @ SSR No, insoect.cn Type /?.s,LJ NCR No.
Work to be Performed A/m o CWP No. c:her Fr- 2)PJ - L-CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC
/-[9 I l' I
/ i l i i
/
7 i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION P'. ACE OF MEASUR.. MENT i CRITERIA ! A/F l A/L l QC 24 ! I i 1 f~ l I i i I I i I I ' I i
! I if I i i i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
A///1- . ~i > Ouahty Contfoi Actions Utilized (Check): C StopWork C NCR C CAR C Tagged Comments
.Dr e. --A%
- n h a es i /,. / =,r ' Au C4 2/7K c.,yg,fr-Ne plA of pst P C - 2 f_ f_ tf Inspectronts! Testts) Completed Satisfactory. des Z No it NO. explain and rnference acolicable cocurcentsp.dmment section.
Inspected By " # Date -2 P 97
. . , . . m u sw
CCT- 2181-3 s3 pub llC FOR'T ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 3
, d SOrYlCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i i.
' TITLE:
TEST CONTROL FORM Type: O FT /i7 CCT O T-Test (CWP 86-290) Prepared By: e- - O-M 4 Reviewed By: O-/)'k u.n.g (Preparer) (0 ate) (fSupervisor) (0 ate) Review / Concurrence: hfbruho$/M.$lu my eo-24 vc () (QA Servicet) (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No hor w //-7 -J% (huclear Lic. - Opefations) (Date)~ Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 474 M b // - /2- % (Technical Services) (0 ate) PORC Review Required: $ Yes O No PORC9QRC 7 0 0 NOV 1 8 1986 t NFSC Review Required: /~7 Ye s 8 No NFSC #: l Authorized for Use: [A.- #/[9M6 (StationManager) (Oate) ssion to Initiate Pe [ (Shift Sup rvisor) (Date) Test Completed: L //'2Y'N (Test Conductor) (Date) Inspection Completed: h Sd.uuull w // /ad[9/ l Q (QA Services '(0'atef Supervisor Review: A% i At //-28 <ffo (De 1 ent pervifpr) (Date) Notification of Test Completion and Results y (Shift Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) l FCRW(Cl372 22 3643 i
9 t 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. - 2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ___C'____________ Operations __________________ Results _____________________ Other _______________________ 22 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from.that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. 2.3 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date __ il _______ _ _$ _$_0_ _Y_ _.$$0_ _ _ __?_~_lb_~_$b____ 3 2 References _____________________________________________ a.0 AUTHORIZATIONS p
.1 De:artment Aceroval _ _ __//_h_8_'h _
.: . 3 , , e r .n s . r :,:e J.; .9 e .: n . E l e : Cl e ar an.:e *tsued. i' cenicei: . Num:er __
4 . .i E s:: a ::n inck :ermit Itsuee, ti re wired: Number __ 5.0 PROCEDURE /
/
/
51 All OR's to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR's revieued: _________________________________ MITNESS POINT. ' g----Q-- g.fC ---------y
-g g gVf.
---/ --------------- _
INSPECTOR Init. Date , , ylTNE S go Check alI cables for proper terminations per
'0 INT . Talf--* vi r i n9 diagrams.
INSPECTOR _S].y-24-$b , Elec. 2C WITNE Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall
~ POINT AS..! /.84 include both internal and extern,1 panel INSPECTOR yiping,
_SG _u_'4 8" Elec. 5.4 Check schematic drawings for functions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of other energized equipment. 4 Elec. .;C 55 During circuit check, all contacts and WITNES jj g conductors must be verified by closing. SCNT ocking or coM inui t y deck as the case may NS ECTOR be. _k 2d_tF86 Elec. 56 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN cel'teria, the appropriate organi:ation l util be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. Lt2_.)L-F-E Elec. 57 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (?.1). include the CCTd. and send it to the Results Engineerin; Supervisor. If no test eculement is used. N/A tnis step. gg g f._g
.' R
$ 'S'G E- Sh k Eb ~ lb S b _g y f //- 2 N S d l
l l
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public PUBLIC SERUICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR /PC/g f ) ServlCOw NO.C C.T- 2/ 6I- y CATEGORY SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE
/[I TYPE:
C CNOVERALL U CN SUBMITTAL U SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT b TEST REQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASS I YES C NO ENGINEER ED S AFEGUARD YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN Cl YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM b YES C NO S AFETY RELATED YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES % NO REMARKS
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPYENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? kYES U NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: F5Af sd.I 1. 2 .'t , 3. 9 4.1. L . d. 3 . G . I . c .? .
/,4.'7.tM.4.7 ;
. */. 7fr t i i 2. c L , e f 'T
.J.4' s' 'i.10. I A' 2,. ,'l a X.f i t '
)
~
'~ '
(. r ( 4 *L ,1 S . s'1 ' & ,L 4 l T M ICO Ll.2.l.1. J.T.I,'l . H U,I 'l. I, . I tl. R . 'I l c <t 5.4.i.S./c.if ', . 7 . 4 '9.7..Z'9 i 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? U YES b NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MACE:___ l f l
- 3. OETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVEDIS AN UNREVIEWED SACETY QUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES:
(A) HAS THE PROB ABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PR EVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED? C YES bNO STATE BASIS: Y.*_ ns r. r dI e li er l M ied i h eN
._ . . I sii C 4.s 4L4 ,u r d '. a . .. ..
i., uj_.et , <t _ 'll
, 't e n es t* .
u's , e f. c 4.,
- e 4 h si < I ( * 'a i; . i ** # e 4 . c m
_n o ..,3. (B) HAS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MAgFUNCTION OF A OlFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PAEV!OUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATLD' YES d NO STATE B ASIS. 5 * + ?M l l (C) HAS THE VARGIN OF SAFETY. AS DEFINEDIN THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REDUCED) YES 2 NO STATE B ASIS. , (c.e *r d l l DOES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO. INVCLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION U YES 2 NO B Y.. . . m.~... ... PPROVED ~ A bmd.m.. M -
/ [~;..<
7" l 7 rorm .C 3': 02 1382
o FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public f
) SOTVICG5 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO , , _ _ _ . , .,
_8 's CN /(OTHEP) "' ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. - -:-3 PAGE / '! CATEGORY -
- . ~ 1 TYPE: C "N Overall G CN Submittal D- 'cT h c'(/('f '. I V-Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed durinej site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? Z Yes C No
(, -s ' ' ' State basis W i ih . 3 'M . >> * *! x 7 4 i is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? : Yes & No Applicab's Regulations NO TE- If e.ther ansser os Yes, the actxty does not unvotr e an unrev esed envrronmental avest,on. S1gn and date the form. If both anssers are No. the actxty has the potential for creat og an unrevuesed envsonmentalquest>on. Cor~otere the rema.nder of this esaivation form. EVALUATION *(Useadditionalsheetsif required) 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See O 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed j 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines. (If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes E No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant Change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents. or a significant increase in the authorized power levep Yes No State basis (Cl Does tnis activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State bass Does the activity involve an unreviewed environmental quest:en) ~ Yes Z No By f" O & 8 n .v. l' lte l'I G Approved _ &f.&s y -lL vi
*~5 s 2, wi suvi y a
-- ;.4ar.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public @' f, - /e/, J, "> SerVICgm PUBLIC . SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NO. l PROCEDURE , DEVIATION REPORT i PAGE / OF [ PROCEDURE NO. TITLE ISSUE NO CcT-2/S/-y Ocr,coe du/ M -29c', Gto 2 / p j , IS PORC REVIEW REQUIRED) 3d NO NOTE. IF PORC (S REQUIRED. THE INITIATOR IS RESFONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT THE PDR IS SUBMITTED FOR PORC REVIEW NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS FROM THE POR IMPLEMENTATION DATE. NO CH ANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE
.53 Q A>t# (D UfA/P/ fjjg f~ t/s/m ' 5 W 0 Tt)f )/)f TAty//.d= p .7~~ fAE'M d 5 S '*
,,f,e fI f& /;WL Y 72 .l /
,tys,el / / AJ ff A<.M ff,04'fC 7d~/0 Add /fdl Vs //^'6
~
l ///$/ kf( f if'7/A)lf, f AAS [ / bW[, ( C . D'I J(f
. . o.- ,
I
\
INIT:ATOR: -
- - I' 2 ! ' 6:>
.54%A r, at ~% <ca r t, QUALITY CONTROL REPRESENTATIVE: ' .s ; .A L'
- 'U 1 -
r.a t. ;A i IREQUIRED IF AFFECTED STEP (S) REQUIRE OC OR INVOLVE TESTING OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT ! DEVIATION CATEGORY: L TiMPORARY U PERMANENT - DCCF ATTACHED l
. . . 1.
SUPERvlSOR: <*', '
*e - ' i U
. s:c'. A rs e. ic Ar t.
APPROVALS - --.
- .. ,, -. . i: -
', . . .g - j'.
l eY- *- **.-
. ' By- ' ' ' ~ ~ -
PLANT V A% ALE 6%! $ ram OAIE P.A%f VA'e AvlVi%7 3 ? ASF $ac OA*4 ( , V BY: BY. Pay (gOgsgA ,t N a;[p, OATg- ,pogq(NagAyTN mgga OA's BY; BY. l .Pa5 Fixes Aoi-ca ita, ; Art. .Pacctxas Aor-;a it a, ;A't 1 PORC. ,, , ,
* * 'CR FCbWARD ORIGlWL TO PC3C 2En( ATTACH CCDV TO PROCEDUNi BEtNG DEVIATED F .r- E W D JE t o?9En CD'es cea ? r *. s em: :n-
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public SOfVICOt PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT page I of I Equ pment Numcer / V (3 o f REFERENCE DOCUn(IENTS Ecu;oment Name $ Ysv*{3oC-/ i T$ V f7 0 I 0 & M Manual M/f Equ pment location ' A 6~l/c7 7 .2., N Ahj gE sf/g V. cbwoze t /2voA SSR No. N' Inspect en Type EQ. M Work to be performed C'C'.7" - ) / 9 l- 3 NCR CWP No.No. R- 2 70 Other C CT -. 2/ g/_ 3 CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT j9Hfl C( -/ fo T ? CAUBRATED IDENTIFICATION CALIBRATICN NUMBER EXPIR ATION DATE QC ITEMS
% ,.p u m m 1L (h L4--vcc4, -PSc_ I 8 - 2 ') l W -b -
, ,y 1 i i i I I i i 1 1 DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F i A/L +
OC s i tJ R f f. o 7'Arw f (.
T O l-/O 'l 04' 2R
~7 9 ".couTw.
--- Co n Ti A> . 01 '
.1 9 h Lt o - C n blK co(U2ar
.TB L.05-
- 14 - cn%. 04' 1r-Cuna 04 /
C'.4 h l CT M ar" llON_)t]C~D . Ca tvd v '<%t $ AAG' N Dr** h u f C o L a.4 CoDt2 J 5{ lhitbf 75 STEP rR PD t2- 26 - Oo '1 2 To cc ^-Mrrc - ( (~_ , f })OI (O&f GW b
- Inscectionisk TestID Completed Satisfactory. V Yes _ No if NO emptain and reference applicable documents in comment section- t Inspected By 1 * - m Date f f A9 h$,
.c....m=.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public f SOrVICO? PULLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADD QC INSPECTION REPORT Page__/_of/ Equipment Number VC V SJ OS- REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecuipment Name do NTP.O L_ L)/1LL/E_ 0 6 M Manual Equipment Location i f~ V E L / A TORR //t/E E Ld Gs - SSR No. Inspectio.3 Type (;,d 7' (EGh NCR No. Work to be Performed T 11 STp4L) er[ $ oIt165M_, U/LlLY-S CWP No. % ~~ S U Other dM W Ql CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT P b p_ h - l l , *2 *2 - CAUBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION QC
~
MI ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE l h l lE. l i I / VI L s t
! [' l I
! I i i i
DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F ! A/L I QC i Al A i i i
! (VI\ l i i I I i I f
I ( l i I i i l i I ( l I i
! h ! ! _
__ Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: N ,& h l i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): E StopWork O NCR C CAR Z Tagged Comments
$?P LMwp Vti QLELeE 1) 'TH LMAJE&TG] A r /A/t 7ttur/EE'g/7*
AAC/8L L $O]& A%/b 4-7 1 5eJPPL Jy_C"/7TJAffej____sf_&
//L. L.
f!jf)))h - Tlf,;,/_/ 7" //&_ll? L (E . sne 5.T C a cng] e m p , -ttvis e e T. v/whe ii I
,I 4
4 Inscection(s) / Testis) Completed Satisfactory. M es Z No if NO. explain and reference applicable documents in comment section. Inspected 8 LLM8 u -~~ Oate_.//[OIEC
. - . = s,3, y
rs- u oi-> Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i e,) SOrVlCO* PUBLIC CERVICE COMPANY CF COLSRADD TITLE: TEST CCNTROL FOR Type: /_i7 FT O CCT O T-Test (CWP 86-290) Prepared By: 2C /e-21 -56 Reviewed by: / _ /0 .? 9.>4 rAe. . {Yreparer) (Date) _ Supervisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: . ere 2 A k l L iP w I o - 14 x, i (QA Services) (Date) Safety /Eny'ironmental [Yes Evaluation Required: '-T7 No / .uh //- 7Y6 (Nuclear Lic. - Oper1ftions) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 8A4Mlw //- / 2- Bk (Technical Sarvices) (Date) PORC Review Required: /_M Yes O No PORC RQRC 7 0 0 NOV 1 3 1986 NFSC Review Required: O Yes / No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: _u[/[s ///$9M8 (5tation M: nager) (Date) Permission to Initiate
. Test: &. f. ' U W.
(Snift Supervisor) 3//7/67 (Dat4) Test Completed: Icb(Te t Concuct$r & [r 3'/r S/A 4
/ ( Dite)'
Inspection Completed: dn 44 O 3 /n!#/ Supervisor Review: 7 (De .c uperfisor) (Date) Notification of Test Completion and Results. jN (Shifi'3rpsevisor) (Date) l 10 CFR 50.59 Review: I (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) l l FORMIC)372 22 364
, _ .m. - $ 0 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 1.1 To verify correct placement and operation of valve actuator XCR contacts installed under SLRDIS cc. I;;p - 1 -
BG n-29_f6 2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Fesults ___________P_________ Otner _______________________ 2.2 Notifv Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes uhich could affect plant operating proce ures uoon completion of the CN/ CUP. 2.3 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 1 l 31 Tett Equipment l l Last Calibra en Name Identification No. Date l l m_______ ________m6__mem___me _m____mm__ ______ __m______mm____ _m_m_______em_____m_ WW_m__m_m_m_m___ ___mm______m___ e______mWW_______mm_ m______em_6_6666 3.: / Refeences___,L/:____________________________________
I , . FT-2181-3 ? age 5 ci 3 4 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 7 4.1 Department Approval _ . '- __d*_O__Pf De ?._ Supervisor Date Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number 4.2 _LLI[L 4.3 Radiation Work Permit issued, if required: Number _h_ 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The folowing steps may be performed in any order as long as they are f un c t i~o na l l y sequential and to not bypass a OC hold point. 5.1 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR's reviewed: _ h,.214.A.,B A .hyE,j_G_________ QC WITNESS F O I NT 8 - - l' ll/ l[ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NSFECToR
$$.:__/_ G/87 Init. Da e 3 67 v 4TNESS pg5 2 Verify th * '
-;s tor CN Z1eo g 'been FOINT - -
meo and successful 1y como1eted. INSPECC R - M(_'_h_*.__ c 5 EE PI)R*8~t -)fl 3a. S . 3/n/BF 5.3 Nake a coov of the Test Equioment Section (3.1), in.:luie the FT #. and send it to the Results En;ineering Supervisor. If no test e;uipment is used. N/A this stes. g _ _ _ k_ _
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 4 ) SerVICOw PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN TCR SCR PCd N O.f_T-381-3 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE I Of 1 CATEGORY . l TYPE: L] CN OVERALL U CN SUBMITTAL [ SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT [ TEST REQUEST _. TEVPOR ARY CONFIGUR AT!ON REPORT L PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSARI L_ OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE T*' SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED. OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT CLASSI [_YES U NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD kYES d SAFE SwuTDOWN . YES L NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM /'- Y E S L NO S AFETY R ELATED C YES U NO SECURITY SYSTEY [ YES 2 NO REMARKS _ __ _ EVALUATION . , Use Addtional Sheets if Nequised . .
- i. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS. COYPONENTS. EQUIPYENT. TESTS. EXPERlYENTS OR PPCCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS) YES L_. NO UST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS '
REVIEv n This test verifies Cor.pletion of FTA frc:n CN ?!76. In itself it doesn't affect _ any system er equipmnt. See SE for FT-0176 for any ap.plicable sections. 2 DCES THE ACTivlTY REQUIRE THAT CHANGEISI BE MADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC 7 [ YES E NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CH ANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE. i 3 DETERY:NE V,HETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVlTY INN OLVEDIS AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY CUESTION UTIUZlNG THE FOLLOV NG GU'DEUNES ,, iO HAS THE "AOBABiUTY OF O . CURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR YALFUNCTION CF EQUiPVENT IMPORTANT TO S AFETY PR[ /IOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BFEN INCRE ASED? M U+8G Z vES $ NO ST*lE B ASIS This test nif checks to see if 44 other tets are Completed Jnd in itSeIf WilI 40t f.ett Anf SfStim Or CCF.DOhent. ThorofGre nO . obnormal tanceci cperation is creeted and there it nO cffect on any margia of cofity
~
in the FSh or T.S. Si HAS THE POSSIB1UTY OF AN ACCIDENT OR Y AtrUNCT:CN Cr A D:FFECENT TYPE TH A's ANY EVALU ATED ::Es:OLSLv IN TWE CS AR BEEN CAE ATED' 2 vES $ NO STATE B ASIS b t!" 3Ea l l __ -
'C' H AS 'HE V ARGIN OF S AF E Ti AS DEF;NED ". THE B AE ! cO2 ANY TECHNIC AL SPEC,FtCATiON OR IN THE CS A A EEEN REDLCED' 2 vES 3 '.O STATE B ASIS . b"" 3N * ._
DCES T-e ACic.iTv AncE AR TO 'N'J C L . E A N U'. A E .lE /. E D S A F ET Y CU E SON _. N E S Y NO , RE S ATETY S!G4F4 CANT _ YES MNC h ' sr 2 e t z . g u.. ~., Y . . ata ;..in :.PnCseO . an,n.. %
/
1/=2=ff-L I
. - - - - ~.--- -- - --.---- - - - - - - - - -.- ---- - ,----- -
A FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public I SerylCOf PUBl.lC SERVICE COMFANY OF COLORADO . CN /<QTf.ER FT- TR ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. r i .llSl- 3 I PAGE 1 Of I _ l CATEGORY TYPE: C CN Overall C CN Sub:nittal Q, Test Request Are a!I measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant constytg or previous plant operation? &X Yes C No State basis All/ effects of this test will be confined to the plant. l Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes 3 No Applicable Regulations l NO TE tr eriner ansser .a Yes. the activs does notinvotwe an unrevesed enwronmental avest on. S;gn and date the form 11both ansa ers a e No, the act:v tv has the potentrat for creating an unrevresed enwronmentat question. Come:ete the terr.ainde of th,s eva'uation forrn.
' .1 s i pi I . r. r . . y sheetsNrespdred) - 5 ~ '
1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Z Yes G No Or Suppletmentary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed _ l
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an :.nreviewed environmental question using the foliowing guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes : No State basis j (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a sign:ficant increase in the amounts of eff ts, or a significant increase in the authorized power leveP - Yes : No State basis (C) Does this actn.ity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis l - MW l J Does the activity invoNe an unreviewed environmental question ? Z Yes Z No By[C d/b.s.. m.
/ -' !
Approved / & rit ,m .. ...
/n.
//-
i 1
- . ;4 4n, c; i
a N-T m v erW w ------_, __ Www-=3 mm -e=w w s %w-m-c sem e elles-'m'ly - gr- s-mw=w----- m----- -^- - -
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION f Public pg, SerVlCOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO B 7 - 14 l '7
- p. .
PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I OF l PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. l TITLE j / n M . ': t y.1. ** - - l P ~T ^d A C
- lN G r Fo
- Vrlt U'E e Wd,ryg N CHANGED TO REA'3ON FOR CHANGE hA A N CHANGED FROM QC w r < sy t4,. r -_
Y M 4 ' W 'm N5.9- 4ce.n T en Au. n S #M M M
- 9IBI4 Fed G -1' M # M cred #/A s Pud FEisoreus.73 STere wggy3 ,
YE(< Qof rnE.h AtJb 9mt ss. kMT) u u E % p utt y (sz g . pggg g , ggp, M " l'LG'T %. pjg;.} <y,3,g ,p
/G G'll,7 HE F'i h uirFM,
? F C w P 'r t. 7;0 e n.2mj
@v6 BEE 4 G4TFJM eFa V ICfD h 67ED. 7 6kE iAJ 4 A)$ oI'
~141 S C.T . I S Nt7 A L*TE %b e o?
WN4t3 A) ht)yl (OA],
.NiTWICR DATE f i cfMw -
/ . r 3/1 m lp 7
-l% ,
--),2 2 YES C NO IS PROCEDURI PORC APPROVE 0? DEVIATION CATEGORY: 2 TEVPOR ARY ISINGLE USD Z YES C NO IS EQ REVIEW RECulRED? O LONG TERM TEVPORARY . EXPtRES
" YES C NO IS QC REVIEW MECUIRED? C PE4MANENT OCCF ATTACHED C ODR .00R ATTACHED ,
APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
' l (7"' -- M Nh # / )
ISUPERVISCR'S SIGN ATURO IDATEn DATE EO REVIEWER APPROVAL tREC;; IRED FOR A LL MAINTENA %CE. RESUL TS. TECHNICA L SPEC: FICA n0N SURVEIL LANCE. AND ADMINIS TRA TIVE PROCEDURESI cATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL Q us;y A- > -~ ' f/ , -4 - tRECVAED IF WCRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOLVES TES nNG CR MAIN TENANCE 0XfAYETY RELA TED EQVIPYE% D E7 APPR
- V ALS
! - / I PLA.*e T VANAuEMEN T S TAFF , OAIE PLANT MANAGEYENT STAFF . SRO, , DATE l .
/;, -~ w , %: % i ,> <, /./ /,,,,ff f / :-i y-p m YSPCNS,8LE FOR PERSON , DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER OATE
, 'm - % > <1 lru r .s,. ,' f -j ,1 Q PORC MEETING NLM BER ,
DATE EATEN 0ED EAPIR AT CN RESPONS 8LE FCR PERSON CATE DATE-PORC YEETiNG NUYSER CATE EAT ENOED EA PtR A is0N RESPONSIBLE FC A PERSON QATE DATE. PORC YEE f tNG NUY8ER CATE E A T ENOED EAPIR A T.QN RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON OAII OATE PCRC MEETING NUV8tR CATE l l
- r: nras INmATOR.rCna Aac ca c Nat to aca: Ot:a A"A w CCP To P*CCE:JC iE.'.G Oh AT(3 QT IR C7 E$ 808 ., S E M '.E C E S S A A
i FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
, Public Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page _ / of /
Equipment Number / c v .t f o r REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Equiperent Name A St. g 3 pt_ rcott) r 'sli y F 0 & M Manual Equipment Location A//A SSR No. Inspection Type p7" 2/9/-3 NCR No. Work to be Perf orrred rwstn si(t/ r-Ifn >= 7 2 i ! I- S' (~l 6 S F /? CWP No. Other >=Y 2/8/'3 cal.lBR ATED EQUIPMENT 9 0 /7 47 / e/ / 7 CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION QC #I ## '! ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE f~ - _7 . W 1/ A A b W? I-/2.ew X' N DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT CRITERIA A/F i A/L OC ( I N I
~W. i 4 /11 wil a f)1' o .-
-//.g)
^ l N w Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
j i i l I i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): top Work O NCR O CAR C Tagged Comments t/62/firi) / 7 2) {s. 4/ Cc&(fit pfX ntci/10f* d stJDeoL. 1; A lN _f - / 7-5 7 A,M & 7- /V/ 7
~TNJS FT 2 / 9/-3 f) O SF 0 t
l Inspection (s) / Test (s) Completed Satisf actory. M es C No if NO. explain and reference applicable documents in comment section. Inspected By 1 4 s s. Date ~!
...,,,m.,,
3 _~;4 CCT- 2181-4 DUD llC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Pace 1 of 3
) St:ifVlCO' PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO t
i TITLE: TEST CONTROL ~ N Type: O FT /F CCT O T-Test (CWP 86-291) Prepared By: // (Preparer)
# Ha Reviewed By:
(Date) [ (Supervisor) f, . 3 9. yc (Date) Review / Concurrence: 3 eara k Muw s d h W f o c9-K. 0 (QA Services) (Date) Safety / Environmental $Yes Evaluation Required: O No s,,, p zz // *' (( f (Nucinar Lic. - Oper(tions) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: [6 j/- /2 F4 (Mechnical Services) (Date) _ PORC Review Required: /2Il Yes O Ho PORR9Rc 7 0 0 NOV 18 1986 NFSC Review Required: [7 Yes /R No NFSr p: Authorized for Use: , jffr//t* (Statie, Manager) (Oste)
,.Wh v:4 (Sht(t'Superf
{k/ )
.6 4.g:
(Date) Test tompleted: r
. ) & c[ 4(jf /
- #-?4 d$
Te nd r) - ~{Mse) Inspection Compieted: '
- - . . // - 2 0-6G Supervisor Review:
[/ )
- O 6 l (Department Suodrvisor) ' ,D7te) o t an R ts:
O 'N (Shift Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (NuclearLic.-Oper4tioiis} (0 ate) FCmMICl372 22 3643
s... taca - -..,3 . w. . s f . , t 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST l 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. - 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 21 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians __P_____________ Operations __________________ - Results _____________________ Other _______________________ 22 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. 2.3 Ncne 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date i Y__N._______ _ f!_ _W_ G ________ ___?,"Ah________ 3 2 References _____________..______________________________ 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS
.1. 1 Department Aooraval _ _ ____ M* @_ ~ h l
eo oerviscr Date a.:
~
9e:h/El ec Ci e sr anc e Iss'ad , if required: Numeer _____
*3. Rid!3tich U c P L' Permit Issued. if re:uired: NGmb#f _____
5 0 PROCEDURE ,
--=s -- - , , - , - - , - , -v -n_, - , , - , - ,-, -e -m --,w - w-,---,----------,v, --w_ - -,
~ - - - - - - - - - - -
4 51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP c - OR's reviewed: _-_____--__--_---________------__ lNT A. $__-(f _'_59./:_8.j $,_&g.
- _ 6_____________ --_____
~
INSP CTOR
$ __/ $_IO
- N - ..
Init. Data TNE
! .2 Check all cables for proper terminations per alNT .'. .# fk, uiring diagrams.
INSPECTOR ge f INS P. Retbc7 fo A CuAAcATmd M- f dO h6 Ele . CC WITN .{ / Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall PCINT !If!.fl.&.i n c l u d e both internal and external panel INSPECTOR uirin9 MAi/x/sc Elec. 54 Check schematic drawings for functions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of othea energized equipment. _Y_NBi/<xl$$ Elec. CC ,, 5. Durins circuit check, all contacts and WITN 4 must be by closing. gconductors or continuity check as the verified POINT
- p. log blocking p
case may Etf I,xAc7,o,) be. hS C.ttcer Fca C'AR'!*CATtou AE E'ec .l 56 Ubere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria. the accropriate organi:stion vill be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. hi
--Elec._c_B_ _ _nf4 57 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section
'?.1). Include the CCT4 and send it to the Atsults En;1neerins Suoervisor. If no test e:uisment is usec. N/A inis s;eo.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) $9tVICOu PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCh NO.CLT-Lnel y SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE //t CATEGORY .
TYPE: O CNOVERALL C CN SUBYlTTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT 2 TEST REQUEST O TEVPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT U PROCEDURE CHANGE IFSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED,OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASS I 2 YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD E YES O NO S AFE SHUTDOWN YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM % YES C NO S AFETY RELATED J YES O NO S ECURITY SY STEM 0 YES Z NO REMARKS
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT. TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? Y YES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED:l$dk SCd * . l 1,l' Q .O S L 1 S 7 M d Q 7.3.1 h f j N_ . R . th CLsf I ; EsL Q ,B g0,1f ,
_hyp e.J h R. 6,_2 , T* ,(tl-f f T,t11D12A se4J. 4' T.S. L e_ o 'f. 2. I,1.
- 4. 3 y . 4. 8/. l. 4 (.. I . 4.iO M ,
it _,5 ,4.1, $.! C. '4 D.'t,N,1,Q
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGEIS) BE MADE TO THF FSAR OR TECH SPE' C YES 2 NO LIST SECT;ONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
l l
- 3. DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY OUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES:
(A) HAS THE PROB ABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOulP'.iENT iMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALU ATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED) n;@ U YES b NO STATE ti ASIS _ IM b %_G@{d *M ._ _ u J- w :~, xAL - A . -D DJ c a s e. e % tw L, w - >~ g A d-Y% -m y -- y g IB) H AS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR M ALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TY PE TH AN ANY EVALUATED PREVICUSLY IN THE FS AR BEEN CREATED) C YES X NO STATE BASIS ) - 7 A l (Cl H AS THE MARG lN OF S AFETY, AS DEFINED IN THE R ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FS AR BEEN REDUCED) U YEi 3 NO STATE BASISd" $ 4 l l DOES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION U YES INO gre S NiriCANT U YES kNO / A f B( - ~ ~ ,M 3 - APPROVED
- NMM.m'm I'Z'd_._ b~m 7 lb f
n,- rm ne
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerylCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO I CN /83 '
- ENVIRONMENTAi. EVALUATION NO. __ C @ 2 I B / M '
i l PAGE /JI CATEGORY l TYPE: O CN Overall Z CN Submittal @ 7ES b del l Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? gYes O No State basis (th e M1MhM r .m fh . is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? Z Yes g No Applicable Regulations NOTL If e,ther ansser es Yes. the actviv does not onvohe an unrevesed envoronmental qaest on. S,gn anc tare the form. If born ansaers are No. the actvty has the cctent at for creat r g an unreves ed eneronmental auestion. Ccmo:ete the rema.no of mis eva%at on *ct:n. EVALUATION (Useadditionalsheetsif required) , 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) : Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed l 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreiiewed environmental question using the following guidel;nes. (If the answer to any of the fo!!owing questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a s.gnificant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the l FES? Z Yes Z No State basis i l
- 18) Wil' this activity rena in a significant enange in the types, or a significant :ncresce in the amounts of eff;uents, or a significant increase ir 'he autnorized power level) Z Yes No State basis ,
6 1 (C) Does this activity envolve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in thUE ' Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity involse an unrev awed environmental question) Z Yes Z No u ,.,.., ..,
- -k n.~.1 l
7 - w,
5 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ;
. S ^m rVlC'uJw PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF CSL'IRADO l N_O _
"; b / L: aO PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT ' FAGE / OF !
PROCEDURE NO. TITLE ISSUE NO. O 7~ // f}
- f (( f $$b d'il'l .Vb ~~ 'Y l, 0 *'L' ?h .
IS PORC REVIEW REQUIRED) OYES NO NOTE: IF PORC IS REQUIRED, THE INITIATOR IS RESPONS BLE TO ENSURE THAT THE PDR IS SUBMITTED FOR PORC REVIEW NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS FROM THE PDR IMPLE'.iENTATICN DATE. p4k CHANGED FROM l CH ANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE o lO/!1l$ <$/// /f<*!jl8; bj f ,0)f Q [')); psi /fj~f /*'s AfisI fbi /5Y
/
N/ dll f,o '. g. ,< n 4g 7,p 3 ,
.W i / A:) 7/':t ,ijf,< 7' jQ.' .U $W/'t y' A/d
//d ?$ AW$
,(g .i '. 'f( f jz) f'r Y <*'QY a// -
f,[ _ /?;h ? jh sW / m-f
< ]('j' ?
/ lf ? f jo,. r /. f/ . '.' !.' N j" /[ H (
GC Lr/a>: t. f- . l -. t l l 1 i
- f l
/.
r ~ "D G INITIATOR: /?- Y'f- - / U ,s h *', ' ~ / U ! ~ E,f;*
-- + csar at .Ca t s.
< p-OVALITY CONTROL REPRESENTATtVE. " ' ' ' /'/ 'L i
~ W .4 .AE ;Ai j
(REQUIRED IF AFFECTED STEPtS) REQUIRE QC CR INVOLVE TESTING OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELATED ECulP'.1ENil DEVIATION CATEGORY. bTEMPOHARY b' PERMANENT CCCF ATTACHED
/ * ? .,. . t .g* , ~ :/
SUPERVISOR; %L * # ' -' 'e ' - M ,- s.aar vet. 7 caa.' r k l APPROVALS _
^' '
, ,i n ,
( . . *. , BY. IW '- I * ' d .. 0 0 BY CATE PLa%T V AN A it'/ INT S' A6 6 $aC CA*t iPLAN T N' A Ne C&'/t % Y iT A6 6 ! , BY' BY _ O A 's iPac;gy ptA A ;aite .Ci Pac-ctxata N eta Pa;;t;,.ag 4 T ca.;ta. ca's Pa;2tbat AOCa li4
~~
5 # ~~ PORC ;att vitt su wvsta. IN.'. ATOR - FORWARD ORIGIN 4 TO PORC CLERK. ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE BEiNG DEVI ATED M E C2 i3>' ETHER COP!ES FCR USE AS NECESS ARY
o FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) $0rVICOt PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF COLCRADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / cf ! a Equ.pment Number P C,t/ $ 1 0 l REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eau pment Name C ONT9-O L_t//lL L/E O 6 M Marual Equ pment Location L,qt 5 "TurQil#E. SSR No Inspection Type C CT~ NCR No.
Work to be Performed [ died 3 ${1 LEA ((Uh_Q3kJE $ M@- PCd -S3' 0_j CWP No. _f G - 19 ! CALIBR ATED EQUIPMENT i CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION C AllB R ATION QC ObY O i 3D ITEMS NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE
~
l I
) I i i [ t i i [, i i i
* " j j DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA i A/F i A/L i QC t i I , i i .
1 I i I i i i ( ! I i l l I I i i i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Acohcable DC Numbers Below A/W I i Quahty Control Actions Utihzed (Check): C Stop Work E NCR E CAR C Tagged Comments I)F.J F5C__U/6TOL'M f_6fI Abl Q_$Ofby Al.Q._k uE% ARS LadR&CTED-.PAcR&LLp dAufC- ^5 - t&c/%. .
-em
*use Ne M
W i
~
Inspec:iont s) , Testts) Comotered Sat sf actory. Yes i No if NO explain and reference apel. cable documents in comment sect;on. l Inspected 8A . lb1C Cate /I
, - . . maw v ~
a FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
, SCIVlCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLCMADD QC INSPECTION REPORT Page I of_b Eowoment Number {JC (/ ,5 Z o i TSO-SloI-1 y 7sV'K20/-2._ REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eco;oment Name (>rQ9.tj(Y)ATI(_, (IM[{QJ \) A LUE O fr M Maai.ia! /
Equ pment Location 'Tu a.(1 GtL'DCr - 4 7 "r l ' ft - Cr4/ AAM SSR No. AJ/A inscect on Type 6 Q - S (2 NCR No. / Work 'o be Performed C C,T ~2__ I 8 I - 6/ CWP No. % -2.9I 0:ner C/d - 2181 CALIBR ATED EQUIPMENT b 9MS Fe 2O PG. G l/6 CAUBRATED I IDENTIFICATION CALIBRATION QC E /920 FG . G 4/fo ITEMS f NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE I /, _C A) - 2 [8 l - SK- 6
% <y\ P t o M i IV\ '-I S S C '
9 - B ') l } %)/VN i!lt5 ' i i ! I t I l i i
! ! I DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION -
PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA i A/F 1 A g, t QC 6 i i,,.."-.,.. i i .. i f I
/ / l 1/ I ///20/86 ' ~
f! ! : i
,f i i i Verify Prgoec%Titerial Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
/ \ l i Quahty Control Actions Utilized (Check):
[ Stop Work O NCR [ CAR [ Tagged Comments {$ t2 rofQ/ylt T) O $(2.t4TiO rd 5 5.I S.'2, E 3 $ S. T C l~ Ccr - 7_ t 2 t - 4 C_'og scr w o,n unvAG C A s c o Y 7sv-sto 1 - 1 i T SN.; - 6 2. O 1 - 1 tm T H Tid FO L L o w irJ G I2E M utTC, ; O PC /?,LATWrd E 2- _ MOULD ST. ( J 9_ (R / F i 6 D A7 3'y A) CT/o_4
/20x g,JD o rd L u D oT_ To R A ve. f 4t on S PL. i c. E s
! i rJ__Co ra b v_L. GTs AT SoLGMoo b (J A L ut S, , U t.R s Fs c ATsOM QF C/1GLF Tff m , M Aw o ru c. Pt.(E to i R l rJ G _ b i AG F A tv1 <, _ M % 1 M c_ 5 1LCa n __ l sLbJ C12c cJ IhGX 3 b CEMQLD ufsL ur_ (_m u tte_Q2J ty As Po51TivCLY \J C R i F i t h l'o R C /T A L 6 "2f THRovGH T R A c4 of T MS Coutu sr F E m_3.31 Po . mT A ro point (A A c, l b t R?cTE b %v T5_' c,7 C O D R_b> N A TOR . Cotu 'n u ;T r(t/1_c5 g. ._P_o s i T t v e ut. (2_J E_Lc A7 / oeJ oF CJL6 c_E
- 28 SM F R.o Ivs 'I 6 TD Sm. ~ /vo s B U A L UE. r> !
I M_99-IS 6JJk'3 A TT_ D UE. TO CotJDuir BemP iN o_. i 'i- R A V C) i RT C TL Y A (E O V %. \/_ A L v 'E. . t)E RiF>c.A T/o l /5 70 SS_f ona F (lasvn b TH ROUG N F v rocTm A L i T t_S T AC f3 Y TSST b Oli2AT iord K . C.3~_jv_b i c. A TE DFol2__f. E.Cl< , r u CgCafeib C.Hi Re.v t (;L/ F e t D, anzc1L._,) 6' CQs)T n rs Lu s 't ? C VLLC V u3 A S PCR Fo A m L D CLu i - ! l <; t b t T1 4 t lJc)(2 m A L C~ u / bt LL^_-di. S uJITH c HEcg._l N/ A_) C, R T 5 6 5 T 4.AJ_C E _ THRCLGH THf CoeL ca/V_DP.#c5 ; inscection(s) ' Testi ,1 Completed Saosf actory. ! Yes Mo /ce ,J- 58T 2] j lhG 4LLund refere.ncy appbCAhle, doc [/nts in comment section. _ inspected By , __ Date //!20 $ '
..~ ~ n I
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public Page of ___
) S O f Vl C O'" PU!LIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLCRADO QC CONTINUATION INSPECTION CHECKLIST EQUIPMENT N AME/ NO.
La i 7 H A 12 T S i S TC t\JC G RT A b LNG 0F 37 OM/Y15 T M 12 0 G Cr 1-1 SOTH 9 c.L._C M o1 D 5 k) H I C H idA.s PCR-Fokm%b (A T TMC GL)M CTroA)' /2Ox FNb. Wu rTY C HT. Cg M IC ltd D T it ,R tn ira A TT To QaA4/TY b uf To LAcw of A CC E PT/9N C E C Ri~rt 21 A - /2EQ uit2SS AM EiG (h-r w t e. R i m G- Kv A s uA rior). T H 4' AAso v r. CIRCulT C HT C l4 h) A G F4 12FO R/nt h 19 < Dil?W reb AY TH f. 7% S T cooR bi A)197612 . O'r IW R A b b > T/ on) A L D T S CR E P'A m c. ) E % N 12 E. A)oTE D' St L o rd La u o e W Rs c~3 a i re t RtwoRK P t u? SS R. ( 30 tJ CT/ O n) th ;> x ll SG HAS Cara c, e p t a A ts t E A M C u /07 < n C' blRT [DE8fto5 i A) S i b 9_ Bo ! i om of Rot n u M cTro n) Gov /s ALso m t G A / AJ G OME Co ut (2 GC flT d . (b ' 3oocWoO Gox / / S '? MA5 coiO &DE (2 r4 G C E A (;bou ro TS O F= /ViT TA /. . f> L / AJG S sNS/D C R o 7 7 0 r>1 of Box. Fc> v (t (D Po tMT TT Rmisu A L R L O C. k iS /7)l SS J A_)G } S Cl? tid om 'Ttllm PT 4 (m s a n9_ dea b Gt Pt (2 A ric>d AARRetG L. Lt F T CIbf Ar TE R rY) Por nJr # 2 1% C'H>PPtb _ < i (M So s Pr cT THRT TT R /h tM A L Btoc W G . ( a Po. d i A t2 9 A) O T A PP/2O ut b B u c & A A) p ed TE2mmAU '
/3L 6~C K S I n) ROTH "tun c 71o n.) 60XT %
3 cA i t s 6 a N G - t is 7. ~ 1 l i ( l i l 1 s' . ,
//? // 1 Inspected by e - Data //
. d
- m 4. m . :: s:9s
FT- 2181-4 g FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION . .' Vg M)/ $0rVICO* Public PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: /_i7 FT O CCT O T-Test (Cli? 86-291) Prepared By: 4/<ve - // - / / - N Reviewed By:
/'
L M ///f % (Praparer) (Date -E
. , . . . - u TuQrvisor) (Date)
Review / Concurrence: AO' / i N-/ d- T1'- (QA Services) (Date
)g ge.Q y ~ -2. -
I Safety / Environmental Yes g fifl?f8C, Evaluation Required: /7 No M/ h , //-/f- 75 (Nuclear Lic. - Opergtions) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: b G// M + //-/ 7-8 b (Technical Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: LQ Yes O No PORC FARC 7 0 0 NOV 1 31986 NFSC Review Required: O Yes LW No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: [A ////f/P4 (Station Manager) (Date) ssion to Initiate g (Shift Supervisor) (Date) Test Completed: ,,
/A ////. 3 'S d' 7 (Test Concuctor) (Date)
Inspection Completed: / - _f r 67 A Servi s (Date) Supervisor Review: Oh/ . A *( / 3 6 Dept e4 / ' ervisg) (Date) Notification of Test Completion and Results: _ m j7 jgg
' (Sni f t ' Supe'evi sor) (Date) 10 CFR ',0.59 Review: '
(T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) FORM ICl372 *2 3643
s - :. ':;-a
*ase 2 ci 3 O
1.. PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To verify correct placement anc installation of SLRDI:. WCF actuation contacts installed in CN 2151. Cw: 3e-291, 2.7 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 1.1 Dep ar tment (s) .esconsible for FT. P = Fr ima v Rese3nt:dil.tv $ = Support tiec s 1.... 3... __s__-_______-_. Opera'1cns __ ____S____-_____ Resui t s _ _ - - _ _f_ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O t r.e r _______________________
- .2 Notify Tecnn:ca' Se vices of a r. y test /exp+riment procedure cnanges wh::n could affe:t p '. a n t o p e r s i t r,9 rocedures upon com:letion of *,e CN'CU .
2.3 N:ti / ope st:cr.s prior te performin; test. 3.C PREREQUISITES 31 Test Equipment Last Calibrati:n Nai+ ' dent:f.:st:on No. Dste _ _M_ pe m_a_v_9_d_ _ _ _ - _ _.l_ '_i_n_ f_ _ _ _/_<f f_ f_ _ _ . _ _ _J_6_ _~_s'_W _ .-- _ _fb_ _ _ _ _S_2_ p_ _ t m_ _. f_ _ &_ -___--______..f.5_ E~su _ S /) .__-___ 2 /?~_______ __-_____ 27 _._.5d'_j ,_ _u_ _w t_\ _&__-_____f____i59S"____ Fn, S' 2/ % ___-______~_-____ i.: : fer+.c++ ___ ___b___-________________________________-_
.,2 . .- .
4.' AUTHORIZATIONS 41 Cepartment Apa, oval ____ _________ _ ___.,____ h3 f7 Dept. Supervisor Da e
- 4. Mech /E'ec Clearance Ist ed, if required: Number .,$,.
43 R a c t a t i o n 'J o r k Permit Issued. if recuired: Number _Nd. 5 0 PROCEDURE NCTE: The (clouir.; st+es ma< ce 'erforied in any order as lon; si th+v 5+ fun:tionally sequent:a1 anc to not bypass a O' ho'c point. 51 Ali DR's 1: the CL: beirs tested have been revie.ec sno are co.erej by this FT. List CUP DR' I rev;eved: ___________________,.______________ C _ _ _ _ _ _ _T_&_ _ d_ 'l. _ _. _#l. _ _ _ _A_ 2 _,8_ Ci . _ _,_ _4_0_3. _E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ P -r-U 8b$ , .?-2-S 7 In:t. Cate NOTE: In order ice p+rf or m tr.e test of val ve s PCV-5201. P C '/ * 'b.' 5 snd PCV 52: 4-3 Boiler Feed Pump 5 F - 3. ' 0 : and P-3101 must t, e steam
. pouered fr om a 5:urce ether than A n:'.tary Soller st+an.
Se ;;in ; st+ar for Destrat:n; Feedvater Heater E-3104 5 r. : v i i to s u :. : t te: i : r, E y e s s s Flasn T a ra T-5201 saucce ar.c not frcm the 1:0 ps:; steam h+7 :er . !! is '. s s u r e d t .a t va'ves P C '/ - 5201. F .'.'- t ! Of and P;V-5214-3 are al' In:tialls closed or :s :stec. 52 S s;tton :4ervers u:tn stecsit:nes nea valves r'.. . _ .J.
- c. . , i ,.. : t _ c.<- .,= .
a,.c
. r,'v_e.i.t<
w .;. a g g- . A g w,act as u_a m
- - - ~ ~ -
- .3 v::: se :- .e ::,.: asee zi: i t::. va ves v_52 a .
I l-521 0 3 .c . - 517$ a5s:e;i!tc viie 'E've . PCV-
---~~--~~
4c r en,uo as u-ir-sc V'. 5.: :, s + - . +r.l. c'es+: ::: 's ::n '.3' et V-540: a** /-342'. 113:cla*.ec w;t- wi ' se FC/-!!01
.e no.,om m x-or- n -- ---
55 v i: ' c s. + :r .+;i- c!cs+c :sc'at.:n an: ' .,- ef_- _ 3sicc16te: .1 ; r. .3 v v6.ves _ v-52525 e - , '.' - : _, . ,,
. . me
_ _ _8_ _[ ____
-,'-;. . - -g;+ - : , :-
5.6 hste in:*.:31 set ecint e# valse ?CV-5201 on P C-s , 'we - *201 <1 06 in centrol .com),
~~~~~~~~~ '
4 frau aet/) @s 11-13~-$6 5.' V;..s .t n - ;IC-5*, Cal. 1see vaive FCV-5201 in tne o/ ru-y ocen pos:+. on. m ". - - 4,,,n _ _BB- - - - _C_ . 5.5 u. t e Ir.:i,: C 5+t r::nt of. valve LCV-5214-3 cn cont o rocm).
. =. .. 4 4 s . - se- :n s' .
seg ~~-------
!- "F. s r ** At 9/w u et O it-ij -sc Vt.5:ng clace 59 FC-52;4 ( I -Oe: t r. ccntrol- room).
g g,a n va've PCV-5214-3 ia the i211v open oosition, gg j oy fi 5 . 1 '+ h;t+ 1 r- I t : s i petit:cr. o f s a' ve PC V-5 ?O5 or. PIC-
, (( p k W
g
- 2. a.H At f(Gst r efd . bas' il-!.f'-Fi 5 11 L.s ni FIC-5305. pla:e vflve PCV-5305 t r. the c _
t;. .y open oesttion. Ms-s !? p, n t s g ,,,,y, n --------- t . ,.
- t. - -
- 3 . s::+-1 ov c l a c i n ; a ,; ur o e r trom to
-.> . 1 ..4
- . '. .e _1 : : e -- -,
ggy., % . . .^ t0
. ;: *4: 3
- - anQ a* t f. e same t;mt gj y ee:uett for c: Servers B *. Valvei to be]In tim:n3
/,-o -S th+ viive closures.
i
)fL;3-2.-@
5 15 ve tiv by local ::.se vation that valves PCV-
/ 52C ! . PCV-5:C5 in: PCV *214-3 aii c1ose j [, CCr'Ol+1elv. (
.~ l
~
in.17 22 ! 5 10 -ak e C:5+rvers recorc measured valve closure
. s t a r. . e . ::mes.
gg
/ V . . V:
t" _ w. . . _ _ ..- s
'. L. .%, . . -
, If.-t
,/ sf- a
===========================================_=
- e. . . j - ,. , .
_----_------_pc---..--------_' Qu, p er ,, --- --_---_----_. . WITNESS : c -i- e-- v.=- / ,/ . 2 - $4c r Q, iN T ... .. g.5 _7 INSFECTOR :[(_=};;-. / f, / 5.;5 :eu e : r e : : .. : .- : m :,: e: 2:er . g 5.'i . ce*;#v :< 10;?' C:le*vit:Cn t33' va'k+5 C '/ - c..,.'.
- (.i=*.=
.. .... a , +, - .- y c ..'.. s ~ -
.- 3-1 '
g.>n ..
.3-224
4:- . 4, . i
- ?S: I e '. + i . .
m gg "SOS tt- I.S*- 86 --------- 5 17 Ener91:e CR 33338-1 bv els::ng a jumter from TB 404-77 tc TE J04-78 t 9f.t-3':-2I9 valves 5 16 Vert v bv 10ca' observation that FCV-5201. FCV-5.95 anc PCV-5214-3 all close c .: ome l e t e l v . >
,.,, __ Els_ _
.!* .; e t. :.v 6 er+v:o.s..v . installec Juw er. DfL 3 -M*/ ~
_. M I__ IV 5 . 2 ..i Veriis b. ? oc 5: observat:on that valves PCV-5201. POV-5205 anc F2V-5214-3 all open c:me'etelv.
~w is eraa,e m w on-is -ec 5.2: V .i s : e. ; F I:: -5 :- : 5. ret.:rn vaive FCV-5305 to iis
--...,33
.3 .
v.a.. .. 1Cn.
~~~~~~~~~
, **.? 2 !? ks (f6a t 9(:) EA$ ll - * $~--84 > V
! . 2 *, Usin3 PC ~214 r e t ur n val ve F CV-5214-3 t o its cr ;inal :es:t:en. ' j <. -
88[
~ gy dC Elck N/3 BM ll-'h8 6 -~-~~----
5 23 Us:n; PIC-5201, return valve FCV-5201 to its jk or:;:ns: :os:ti n. gj(Jf N En ~~~~~~~~~ Ac Ofctsrefs Mt il- 44~~8 6 l
- 5. 2.: V ; e *. u r n 'sc'ation va:ves V-6420. V-Sc21. V-5268.
;-50c 4 V-5270. V- 50c25 and V-52c26 to tneir ort;:nsi ecs:tions.
gg
!.:5 "a e a s c : c i t r, e e s t E :u t ome n t se:tton (3 1),
i .ne'+:e :n+ :T n. a n .: senc it tc tne Res dts E n ; ; ri e a r : *: ; ' u t e r /1 s c r . 'I
. ro test e :'J i O T.e n t
- ! U s e : . N 'e'= + . ". 1 St+=. g'""g>
su., su s. zo. io pra -z e Es s i'~~~~~~~ s ' 2 6 . 11 P/d
.f. t& . 2. BES' -
BAS S.2&.3 S pg,./L.p V240 S.2 6 .4 _ A A S' S~~. 2 S. G BAf s'. t ri . h*' RE 5 -- g g,,4 DiL h'f?Btf _ rv s. G . h _ EE C _ g.pg.iy Ffe 1 5 2&.7 EIS S~. 26, i& 2d.[---- s". a s . s % 3
- i-t,! g. 26 .iy __ EK
- f. t& 9_ W .s .26. 4
~
BAsL_ 1
1 e Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCh
) SerVlCO* ~
NO.r T - 2 /X/- 4 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE _ / 64 /
~
CATEGOfW~ TYPE: C CN OVERALL CN SUB MITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT N TEST REOVEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE IFS AR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURESINVOLVED,OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI M YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD C YES X NO SAFE SHUTDOWN X YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM X YES C NO S AFETY RELATED X YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES N NO REMARKS _,,_
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS. COMPONENTS. ECulPYENT. TESTS. E_XPERlYENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FS AR OR TECH SPECS? %YES C NO LIST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REV'EWED. b_h _O.i d ) . Ask _,,A.hSN_b I
LC;k)*" LnL&-Q_ A l gt L. $ . I4 2O % 4Q V SW__ fer c.t W1 $ la2.1- %]dlu J,jo , 2- l0'E.I= g Sf./ IV W }V f U /4I P }f). ) /
/
. * % L S'Sp I k v &_ / f( M y .LL@ 4_tt,%54.f10 76.1 G+d SEJ. L U
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE TH AT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? C YES % NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE Y ACE l
l 1 DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVO VED l$ AN UN AEVIEWED S AFETY QUESTION UTIUCING THE FOLLOMNG GUl0EUNES. Tr,/. M l4 d ,AUD CO 63Cb. ~0/0/9 (A) H AS THE PROB A81UTY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUiPYENT IMPOR TANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BEEN INCREASED) C YES % NO STATE B AS!S.2 A'd9' N$b:~ E rncMALW /s Top />**y_CCH6Cf" E/'(.6W D"T' AL3h_1M3_T! 8 LL.Ld II.LQh.'LOf- M LN6_ yrA Ae_ T'fsI1ck1 cettrA w CW 4
'90)
- G'Idl . "T"gs -M* T t van 8MllLfQf.MEh u @Lf- THe= ftf.AcrtR & .SRt.aT_D:NJhi__T'.sth l
"M Mt X ost M.:%D_ -vt(e- b6.%1(.s).':Lis.i'M_QLa16fdET10u of W4- TL3k?3dg{ '3Tt".h I
. S' G.4Tc A t-nt C 5"'Th 3yMJf:(M'C "Th C- t*dLS(-QQGu.5dts_cEAu_ACALbt-* iT cRaasEuw r % 4 auspyAuT xttyco Muv o r6F6Ty Memosty ev AL.u6Tth_2t1 "BE Fr5 AR ts ou AffrEk'TGb . tB) H AS THE POSSIBluTY OF AN ACCIDENT OR M ALFUNCTICN OF A DIFFERENT TYPE TH AN ANY EVALUATED P AE'.lCUSLY
~
IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED) C YES 2 NO STATE BASIS __d2M"IfcuC/2J$48 "rH E _.mw rm mw_n_ -( er wy_,. wake-Aa4_A&sl rHE__E. Euhy_C.cuTAc Ts. f cR 9332A. _nibM -ct118 R) & uar_MrATt- Auy_ taw CAtu.tM w.bc-s _ MEe '3AS (C) H AS THE M ARGIN OF S AFETY. AS DEFINED IN TF E B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR EEEN REDUCED' YES X NO STATE B ASIS _'M %Md__L./-.D %d Autu SN. Edf . I arf-IET.M C A '"iLE_ WahC. 3 'TYt f- K AC Cir.LR t BW M*Il_hlOk.3h Q G 1 M . f G 2,;tLill:1__
.5MLswurtoma_cccutuc=_iAta c -s v M m ysh Annom_y muGes.
_hemelts. Mate _Tcex sP_ec.s_Atoer vatAnd h .Te-cr heesxor s:ff Ae r er* G o">_6.R A 5 Lt iTu c- f a-H C ~"" Q f\ l oe- sie-/LA.^- AMb_.S.< TTLAcru.L4_ 7TG A% Sy$~Tt h $ . DOES THE A TlVITY APfEAR TO \ VOLVE AN UNREVIEViED S AFETY QUESTION U YES 2$ NO
% J.
4BE S AFETY SIGNIFICANT C YES T* f // N Sv- M_ nsa rst, MMb cai APPROVED U/ / r' f r v - -- ' 36%a i e ta*t A ,x-- - /,d @ n /o/sc
%: m c: un 4
F RT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) Service- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN i@2/ - 4 NO. __ 2.,/
PAGE /th / ' CATEGORY - TYPE: Z CN Overall Z CN Submittal Other F*7" Q/D-Y Are all measurabie nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? K'Yes D No State basis ?__WG t'_ T* 5 hr0 M Y5 h AJS SYQ 'IT1A&jfA-= WG-19 M l 19A./JLh_C.27hly 5_Td L^A T ',*'S *It'.616A 4AG l cm >rmnwu rHe PLAw Yes is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? fNo Applicable Regulations tiO TE. If e ther ansser *s v es. the a:t s&v dces not onsotse an unrewesed on.oroninentalquest on. S gn and date t*e ro rm. It both ansse?s are No. the attxry has the catent al for creat:ng an unrevesea enstronmentalQ est:On. Car"0 ete the rema nQer of th:s esalvat?on fctm JEVALUATION (Useedditionalsheetsif reqhdred) 1. Is u.e activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Z Yes : No
- Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 317 Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity invol,ed is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(if the answer to any of the following quections is Yes, then this activity involve 5 an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES) Z Yes Z No State basis ( ' (B) Wdl this activity result in a significant change in the t'ypes, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power level? Z Yes : No State bas s _ _.- (C) Does tnis actmtv involse an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES) i Z Yes Z No State basts Does the a@vity 'nvo!ve an unre'..ewed environmental quest:on)
, Z Yes : No M
svFew y s .s . ,. agas.A,A.
- Approved -
,u m<s(...<due f
.11, S, M .
. . . r. a u ._ ..
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC ,, gg, E 7~ # /8 SerVICgs . PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO I PROCEDURE DEVidTION REPORT PAGE / OF d a ISSUE NO. PROCEDVRE NO. f r- ti S) - 4 TIT L E fr cc a m 2/9/,(% 9 Pb-FI/ MNONO' CHANGED FROM CH ANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE f,/ ~,3 ; f,,, j ,1/ 8 40 l'ff W m w J//iscf av f f,J J TD B a*
/fdX TFfr ev /f.d fe46 O Ad/t4 4'l AtYa />t 4 7/C. 72 vet e
- G Be im t.
f'77/ c M cf ff 7sr & c.0 70 I A t VF $~ SC v -S a /), Sf.d yiC 4 .
/E v - f.'ol, Ih 3*. sty,
$C V .S*2 /4-), ft e -
S i/.~ syr,; pce.
!"?/$*]. -
Se lh
- 5.- /t)$~{t) /'C.$/ T/( M / 6(A[ $ 7lCl'4.* 74*A 7/C la 6&
b Yi'Ik k Y WYSW V8/ l f.f ,W e!.,r) $ D Ad $f.,AA'Estl eid f/d / t'ff f( U* [l /),
'" D
- 2' ' ' ' # " ' ' ' '
/ E t - f ? / f'- / /4 v /) f*F !$1 t v t. t **/~- 2 /s 4 -f
/ [ l'
- Il
.. }}p ( f*g,,) k 4 0 Y f o b7o1/4 fin y $/s.'Aso s
( .T'S dt/t/, 7 .dC t<
- M E fiATOR , OAYE h (n - . s W f l L._ ?" O "
- MIS C NO l$ PROCEDVRE PORC APPROVE 07 DEviAT10N CATEGORY: MtMPOR ARv iSiNGLE Usti g lIS C NO IS f 0 REVIEW REQUIRE 0? C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY EXPtRES
#v E S C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRE 07
/ ^ PERMAhENT 0CCF ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ] 3 a. 7 ISUPE RviSOR'S SIGN ATUREi (DATti EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL ,. - 1 tREQU!MEO f0M ALL mal %TE%A%CE. RESG(T5 tECSCAL SPECPCAn0% 5URVEILLA%CE A%O ACVhtSTRATIVE!MOCEDURES) 5' $ )
QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL MYk
*REcu RED If WORK REQutRES QC CR INYOLVES TESTWG OR MAINTE% A %CE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPYE% h
** 'Y7
+
, . APPR e VALS rLANI VANAutV6MI 5f Att
- UAit kNi bi Af t sMA DAIL
' //1,. A (0i. 0 J n Jih 3/@j*7 rvAN /d -T MAN ADu /LO~ ~ e .up 7
- proct 0vpEACTHOR!4R 0 ATE mESPGN5 8LE FCR PERSON
* ![uh ?!. > V h J]#1 DAf 3/ tl% hl /~,./,!-r/tY('s '; H7 PORC MEJTlNG NvYS ER CATt 7
L AT LNCtD LAP:R ATION RESPONS 8LE FOR FER$QN DATE f DATE. l POR C VitTiNG NVV8tR DATE t *!LNC&D EAP R A f.CN RtSPONS+6Lt FOR PERSON CATE I DATE PORC Mitt NG NLV8tR CATE L sitNOED LAP >R AT ON HiSPUNS SL6 FCR 814%QN QATE DATE, PORC MEETING NLY8ER DATE 3' E !385 INITIATOR..sCa,saac a ; sat : P;e: C. Eat A"a:M CC'v to ea0cc.=E SE NG Oiva?l: 0 %(a ;;ptg s a of -5 Nt:155A5
a 9 aw 4
- s;
. . .c .s g
+
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public Poa NO. N 7 '/8/ D SOTVICOe PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i - - PAGE b N "r b
..- PROCEDUNE DEVIATION REPORi OP Tatt PRouchRt r7- No./ 2/- W l nsSul No. fr coa 01) 2 / Q / , (wJO Ss*, 'I f)
Qd NO NO ' CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE fff fggQ ls / aL O A/ ) $$$ f,)4, .5 nisto IS M M N V-3*2/3 n'/ omuvs v-e 2 r,g , f,y$,& y( $ NCI/ /b E0; $ff $8ps'&
/ Soc dic' kV-Ds4 /
S y c'c oti a 6 v -211 < S. Eb
- V i t/(~(s) y pfgg;yr f b , i S &'d' W6 C o'd ,
iju,97.c fce - n i f- 2. f*/ O/ /// A'4 y -D //,,, ~.
!". ? 6 . 6 AJ sIU c/En st_ vrfips/ sfAL //# l'd-rut c <* 10s av /%v-Do3 . ,.
td$/ & D(,,. [J/ f (T PL \
/~,[$,} ,g gg) We* A*
epo v b/A ' N FM 4C QQ, ggg g' Ac v .n a 4 - l i j 0 'J
- FJ I 4 * .' Ot** /1C = f 2 4 Y( f.s /, )
QATE
.NiLATGA m C M '.-{i n f w ./
DEVt ATION C ATEGCRY: MEMPOR ARY qs;NGLE U$ti J-Z ~ 7
< vES Z NO IS PROctDUPE PORC APPROsto? C LONG TERM TtYPORARY . EXP;R[$
# NES 2 NO IS EO agvitW REOviREDT MES NO IS QC REvTW REOviREDP C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACPED C ODR 00R A5 ACMED
% -- / '
APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED 10 ATE. iSLPE RVISOR'$ $1GN ATURif
~CATL
/
EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL atavinEa rcR att ust%TE%s%CE RESULTS. TECH %ICAL SPECiriCAT10% SLRVEILLANCE. A%0 ADM:\;STRA TIVE PROCEOURES) jCATL I QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL
. nEC;.uREO if nCRK REQU RES CC CR IWOLVES TES Ti.%C CM MA1%TE% A %CE CM S AFETY RELA TED ECuoPME%T) I -
, Rg.e APPROVALS .
LAIT etAN T MANAvtMcN T bi APF bav VA;a r .A'. V AN Avt Y t N I h T A> 6 m RESP;N5 BLE FCR PERSON 'CATE _ PMOct00ptAUTHga y _
... DATE
/ . . . . . - -
PGMC VEETEQ NLYttR - CATL
, ,j initN;ta ttPIR AT CN M;h.SM;R Ft# 50N - " lCATE CATE j . , ,
l _ , M Cnc viti,Nu Nov5ER r "! A i t I -
, / -
QATE q t ' t .;t D t APiN A LGN, i ntSPONb dLE F{4 9tRSvN 1 _ - - -
, M;;,6L36 si.6, AevM 8iR OATL
~
(
- t. 't'.;tQ E AP R A t CN - OATE l At5eQN5.dtt 6C A Ft A5aN DATE ,
,1 romC MEET:NG NLYSER DATE
".' M E.15 IN1714f 0R F C .s A a; : s , ,; g 9; p;a; c, gat A 4 n ,;py To pa;;g;, a g g g i,3 a f . ATE D C NE a ;,e g g s.-a . 5
- A 5 Nt E 5 5 a 3.
a t,,
../ .
- FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubllC ,;, yn SOfVlCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO D/'E/ O PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT'P w
PAGE b 'O F ' b PROCEDLRE NO i TITLE i r- nst- 4 l ISSUE NO. rr ced cic 2 / /) , (wf Afo -d'9/ ltilTo' CHANGEDFROY CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE 5.26 0 NAU yygy y SA 6 //s t 4 ff% 781202 .fr 70 7A )?r2-](> l .7 -/o ) ife d _
/)$V$ / C D'lh l'dC f Au f4'.f
//)(s')$//b h if f fe u ~ /2 STA CM
*Tf/// s.
S. Ib AIbU QQj Q /}$ &&sQ Sf'd WEfl'C Time C //fN JV y * []/ j __ .b . ph, ,-p i _2 V h . V u -J 't ! L }3 M . [4sn:WDWr:s2e M ' gati iNifi A T CH f 5Y~ l V k/ % }fk " DEVI ATiON C ATEGORY: WMPOR ARY <S;NGLE USE) ( C ES C NO is PROCEDURE PORC APPROVEo? C LONG TERM TEVPCR ARY . E.mpiPE$ l C VEs C NO 15 EQ REv4W REQUIRED 7 C PERMANENT.OCCF ATTACHED l O ES C NO IS CO REVIEW REQUIREDF C 00R ODR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED icATEi isuPERvisoR s sicN AftREi GATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL rRECut*ED FOR ALL MAINTE%A%CE RESULTS TECHNICAL SPECJiCATION SURh EiLLANCE. AND ACM:NISTRATIVE PRCCEDURESJ DATE OUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
,pEcu *Eo w acne nicuinES aC on twoLVES TES T142 CM MA%TE%ANCE C4 SMETY MELA TEC EQUIPVENTI i n . . '- APPROVALS (
MNi VANAutYLNI $i APF GAIE PuNI MANAutYtNI 5TA## 4AV OA it f DATE PROCEDURE AvtMCRt2ER DATE t RES*0N5.8it FCA PL8SCN
~~
I , , . _ . .
- QATE PQ*(C YEki.NG Nul6 @
RESMS OLE FOR PtRSON CATE l LCENCED ELP m AT CN OATE- - -- POR C YEETlNG Nuve LFL CATE CATE .. f.-., (A
- tN0iG LAP 4 AT.ON R E SN.%.d d f sit i t A 6CN -
DAT( _ . - POa C YE ET.N S NwV8 ER cAff
- - - - OATE 4
- EW EC iLP4 AfiCN RESPON) QM M5w&*
DATE PORC VEET NG NLYBER
- P: M 3335 thlT1ATOR f Ce A A*L C# G Nai 70 8'.4" Cii% AP A;w CCPV TO PaOCEOL'E SE NG OEY:ATED 0?"E8 CCP ES FCa .it As NE*ES
8 e, y .
, R FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ,02 Nc.
97 "/ E /O SOfVlCOs FUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
. PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF P p pt?'fj fj y jiSSue No. TiTL g - p g g gjp g g pg ,, j g, f
$^QNO Ng( CH ANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASCN FOR CHANGE S.26. /0 ivjQn tVs.ews 7,yg S/&' db Pd bl/N h k [h// t 78 12c3 -ff" g.u9 '
7xy_ 0 /2)H2p -jd ( 2 sb) '. -- S.?&.// A>Eto l' fair y E;f /t rsz. S /dCVA CSSff t!G7/f u 77H r V4 tuff &p 52 G J ff t ' N /$ -/ s9 %f) rCC'V 'f2 /(/-d /) /C. - fr - cA" w ,
/p", f SW .
2 T SW .
~7 ? SW .
1
/ OATE t N' T i A T C tLO .
D /w - $0 '{ 4 -- - ?"I ~
""~vES C NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APPROVED? DEvtATION CATEGORY: MVPOR ARY (SINGLE USE)
DES C NO IS EQ REVIEW REOVtRED? C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY DP!RES c""TES C NO IS QC REVIEW REQUiREO? C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C OCR OCR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED iSUPERv!$OR S SIGN ATURE IDATE GATk EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL oRECu. RED FOR ALL MAINTENA %CE. RESVL TS. TECHNICAL SPECJICA TION SURVEILLANCE A%0 ACM!Nr$TRATIVE PROCEDURESI CATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
.RECu RED If %CRK REQUIRFS QC CR twCLVES TESTING 03 MAINTE%ANCE C4 SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPVENTI APPR
- VALS -
FLON I VANA4kMt.N I b f Af f CAIL PLANI M ANAQ4MtN T SI Af f 5RQ QATE RESPCNS 8tE FOR PERSCN DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORt2ER CATE
.. - ~ -
PCRC MEET 1NG NwY8ER _ . - - CATE E 4TENC ED LAPiR AT,CN PE5 PONS 18tt FGR PERSON DATE DATE .- PORC VEETING NLYSER - , .. .- CATE
+, ENTE % EQEA M AT CN R E s%N>dtE 6 GR 91850N -
OATk DATE ,, - PCR C YEETiNG NL M BER CATE
%, = = '
E t T kNpgD E,,P.R .T40% RE5PQN5iBLE FCR FER50N CATE CATE
~
PCRC VEETiNG NLVBER CATE
- i?? M 3M5 IN.714(0m.8T AAa O* C NAL TO &O ; C(ERK A"ACM CO3v ?O DMOELRE BE NG lEV ATE 0 C%8R [08 Et 8CR 60[ AS NE!LbSM
s.
.i -
/
- n. o r. .
- FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC pg, yq N 7 ~ ,' 2 / ()
SerVlCO: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
~
PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF
'yy*_",',',",9,.fl'"**~ l "'f 7- FM t*M 2 .'X) ', r te /2 N ~ E f J
$1To' CH ANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE S.76./& <v h v ,9,y,94 yg,,,,f);4 .Sd4 #4*w d' f/p;m 781et1 -72 To rif /to / - 7) (.7 * / 0) ,
/06ju Sd6 ,<' h j.g S'EG /5 WDif's ,E v /ecn . _
;,;9,-
c fSt.JNT)se v V1r M [ Pc y -5s if
/k v e 5s / f ~ / /2 00 f fr v - 5 ?i 4 a A /c 01M& O,% i4 f/Hy.I
- f. 2 6. iG A> f w h//s a s w ir e s us Huc 7 % it 7dicef.72- D y t-. .$ a r. ,
( 7tistf- 73 ( T- !?) .- ;, , p Qf D 7?m ,
- gatg l
iNi' A TC p 1 S d/ s. h V'/? k 3' c? - $ 7
< YES C NO l$ PROCEDURE PCRC APPROVEO? DivlATION C ATEGORY: CEMPOR ARY (SINGLE USE)
M YES C NO IS EQ REVIEW REQUIR ED) C LONG TERM TEMPORARY E.xPiMES _
,*"'T" Z NO IS OC R EViEW R EQUIR E0? C PERVANENT 0CCF ATTACHED C 00R COR ATTACMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SLPERvtSOR'S $1GN ATURE) IDATEi EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL t RE:ViRED FOR ALL MA A TE%A %CE. RESUL TS. TECHVCAL SPECIFICA DON $U4b EILLANCE. A %D ACMiN!STRA n\ E PROCECURESI l CATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
,aEcu aEo ir acRK REau;REs CC CR lWCLVES TE5DNG OR MA6TE% ANCE ON S AFETY RELA TED EQU.PME4D t1 e.
APPReVALS - r ua. . VANAutMtNTsiAke QAlt rLAN T MANA6tMtNI 5T Atf 5RQ QAT& l l RESPCNS 86E FOR PERSON OATE PROCEDVRE AutMORIZER DATE l PORC MEET,NO NLY8Ea gAfg t t (T ENOtQ EAPtR AT,0N RESPONS1BLE FOR PERSON CATE DATE PCRC VEETING NyYBER CATE m LA TEN;,iD t aP R AtiON kE SPG.N5 6.1 sGR &tRSON CAft g l CATE -
' PORC YEETING NLVSER OATE j
t s'4NCEO tiP R A T.ON RESPCNS aist f GR FtR$ON CATE DATE PCR C YLET.NG NLM8 ER OATE
": D USS IMT ATOR rCa,st a :s ; Nag 'o s a; : gag f r s
- COpv TO 3ac;g:.at gE Ng E'.' A T!? C'*E R 08ti ,Ce .st as st:iStaa
--m_.
4 #
, . c,. . r, ;
,o 's.
,, e FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
, C PcR No.
$gryl Cgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 7' /I/ O v/ PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF b PROCEQVRE NO IS5VE NO- TITLE e r- ? J C ) .- d- C*7" nf G) .2 / f / / f er' / N*U' J
$idN0 g0 ' CH ANGED F ROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CH ANGE
$< b 6 ./f" $ $fd V fdif y B y t'o c s c- S6:s d'd'ct 4 6SSfdM 7/e n 78 d r tM t v f 3 1 4'V - Sa'i 3,
/fV-52l'I'/ M't1 ff p - 5 ?,/,$ O N l'd CAS O
~
e 5b 'lh N Y fg y ,} gn:' Sf*/ WE/ K 2-DNm l'-S 2 7] _
$* Sh. / / $$& g g g [j l } { / .SYW 850 V $
l cppn v - EZ 13.
$, )(o . / W $ b MJ /l .$ l* s: kl .S &W.,. $ N t h v-52/6.
l
, a ,, , - . f> i, . . . ,re 4-VT2e Py TH f** s* ** G 3=- l J - +w
,, w-<
e ,* -<0. o t- 2 e. .. . ,n DATE
^'T,A T 4
&Ev
, j f.
Af L - ' F :' - / 7
'""v E S C NO l$ PROCEDURE PORC APPRO% ED? DEVI ATICN C ATEGCRY: ar"t%POR AR r tsacLE usti LONG TERM TEVPCR ARY E.uPIRES
<"" Y E S C NO l$ to REVIEW REQU RE0? C PERVANENT. OCCF ATTACH {p DES C NO l$ QC REVIEW REQUIRED? C COR 00R ATTACMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED iCATEi ISUPERvtsCR S SIGNATLati DAIS EO REVIEWER APPROVAL l iRECutRED FOR ALL MAINTE%A%CE. RESULTS TECH %ICAL SPEC;f*CAh04 SuRVEILLA%CE. / A0 ACUSSTRAnVE PQOCEDURES)
CATE , QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL \ ~RECU. RED IF WCRK RECU)RES CC CR IWOL VES TES DMG OR MA A TE%A %CE C4 S A TETY RE.A TED EQutPVEN n
. apen.va rLANI V AN AutVtNi bT Af f DAIL rLAN ' MAN Aut9tN ' di Af f nRv GAIL OATE PROCEDyRE AUTMCRlER ~ CATE RESPONS.8LE FOR PERSON PORC YEtTiNG NUMBER CATE R[$PQN$ gi[ FQR P(N$QN C jg t m iL N;!O f..n PiR AT,CN DATE PCRC YE ETlNG NLV8 LR CATE OA!E 'e, t = ' L NOLD L &R A T.ON CATE l RLSPONS.6Lt FOM PtR50N j \ .
PORC YEET AG NLYSER tOATE i l uSP NS ea ,- RScN 3 1E
.mNaa -R A1.aN DATE PCRC our.Na ~m 8,R cA1, m , .; , . m . , , , m , , ..m 3 4. : . ,, . . _ , , . , .
>. _ _ A, R . m. , . . = . . . T c . . g. . .
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SorvicOt PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLCRADO A
QC INSPECTION REPORT Page _l__ of / Ecu pment Numter p:W.*. V $2O/, 5,30.*iM2/V- 3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecu:pment Name #2c3_/(4_Catz[a%.__VMcyd 0 & M Va%at YA Equ pment locat:on ; g-64J46. SSR No. YA Inspect on Tvoe dghd2 ^7e1 NCR No. Work to be Per erre1 4~gacrzov_4 J2:37 id/ W d CW? No. _6(0 _d31 Other #7 2/8L _Y CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT CALIBRATED i IDENTIFICATION ! CAllB R ATION ITEMS i NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE l, QC StrAWArt a ! EstSA$s i 2&% 6[Mkv4BH ' d eLS 1525 ' d - S '7 i@Y _&EcvL.vetcd EMS H.3f ;
/0-87 C'2Tb I I f
DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT CRITERIA A,F A' i ! < O C_ Y .- E ' I T' i l j > Verify Proner Material Control For Job. List Apohcable DC Numbers Below: N /',qr @ ;y.p.g r i i Quahty Control Actions Utilized ICheck): E StopWork E NCR E CAR Z Tagged Comments i Or2 c @_ys4__Yg42/AZTAff&4f}g*Q,.4i'gfc,)_pg)__ &gc"A_fe fd _3dCE,Z'OMJ__f, o Avd__31W VeWZd2*C'AfsMJ fGMA_.AC1c"P74dSd_,
/ ~ 7" (,;22MA'A76
]Q Cornoieted satisf actor,. : No if No ennain and reference arr' able documents in comment section j Inspected By 4 @ Date _2
- J
- 5 7 l m .. , e r: = s:r
t
~
i - - a$, CCT- 2181-5
, Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 3 . g') $0rylCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: O FT /._i7CCT O T-Test (cWP 86-292)
Prepared By: N-M-/6 Reviewed By: /)bw /..ag e
. (Preparer) (0 ate) upervisor) (0 ate)
Review / Concurrence: I'>orle k d u n d b w u
, c-u aa I
((QA Services)- (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No .// > A # Hucle~ar .Lic. - Opestions)
//- 7-8 (Date)
Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: If4M // - / 2 ' 64 (Te'chnical Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: /8 Yes O No PORCSQRC 7 0 0 NOV 1 8 1986 NFSC Review Required: O Yes @ No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: //w 4/N/#
'(Station Manager) (Date)
Permission to Initiate A Test: Wr -
/ 2 -n-46 (ShiftSuprvisor) (Oate)
Test Completed: Dh ' /26/l .2/N/f 7 ' (Te Conductor) ' (Oate) Inspection Completed: .,s.u ct tx d A, P.7 G Sr9 [' (QA Service T (0 ate) ' Supervisor Review: 31 @ nv b 3-86 O (De((@entSupervQor) (Octe) Notification of Test Completion and Results: ~
+ -
fM ($hift Supervisor) I'*,,N[ (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) 1 muicim n.aus I
,,. ov6 - ,2, . . . . ,
l 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. - 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians __J?____________ Operations __________________ Results _____________________ Other _______________________ 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety ana1Ysis is required. . 2.3 None [ 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date __YOJu________ ___M~__$_6_?_?________ ___d__g?__PL_____ i, 3 2 References ____,________________________________________ i F J.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 41 Decaatment Aporoval y _ r: _[Oh -h st. perv. lor Dati 40 Fe :n / E l e .: Cleir19:e !!5ued. if reautred: Num er _____ J., R3:ist:On Ucrk 'ermit Issuec. If re:utred: Nun.oer _____ r 5.0 PROCEDURE
. _ _ _ , . . _ _ - , ._._...,,._.m,,., _ . . _ _ _ . , . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ ,
- con - v: e 5.1 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been s reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR's reviewed: _________________________________
WITNE , _ _ _ _ .Y_ _~_ _N_ _ _E_ _'~_k_ _j. _0_ .+- 0_y _b_ - 4_ - - - _'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~
POINT .. . INSPECTOR
$k_/_?_5 Init. Date U
w YlTNES % Check all cables for proper terminations per 0 NT . , .M. '6% utring diagrams. p. r- O INSPECTOR eC. WITNE 3 Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall POINT both internal and external panel
-E.fi$fnc l u d e INSPECTOR u i r i n g . p . ,2 s'- 9 7
_ AJd_ _ Elec. 54 Check schematic drawings for functions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of other energi:ed equipment. # -8 f' F 7 _ Afl_ _ t.)GC.
-~
[:,<,]TNE ng c redt c'eck, n contacts aM must be al} verifled by elosing.
- .' W' T h-Monductor5 3pggg, Olocking or continuity check as the case may be. 2 -p r. ? ?
_ phd._
-lec.
l 56 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria, the aopropriate organt:atien will be notified of the discrecency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. ; -> r r ';
..A2/1f. _
- Elec.
5.7 Make a COPY of the Test Equicment Section (3 1). include the CCT*. and send it t: the Eesults En;ineering $aperviscr. If no test e uipment is used. N/A this step. 7g
. FA a-n .c6 nmr,s-
.m
.T _ _
I2. go_g INSPECTOR '
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC/h
) SOrVICO= No.GC 7 ? lel 5 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE __//l R cony - - '
TYPE; e O CN OVERALL CN SUBMITTAL SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT 2 TEST REQUEST C TEVPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT PRCTJOURE CH ANGE (FS AR) C OTHER l CLAGStelCATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI 2 YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD [ YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN 1 YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 1 YES C NO SAFETY RELATED 1YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES 2 NO s REMARKS l /
- 1. DOES TH S ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEVS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPYENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRiaED IN THE FS AR OR TECH SPECS? Y YES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: EMS .
I 7.1 l.h I. 0 ; N L1 4 ~3
.. j d4J .7 I y j
. Bas,.7Ltt.n , c t.pLX , mA,sAio,n' , Ape au R s. 1 , 1* / LLs1,1Xzs126 I "E. S . LLo 4. 'L 8,1 4,3.1.4 . 9. 4. l Y.L . I 4.10.4 ft 5.4.1, $.IC. 4 ~ W. S A $.1. Q
. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CHANGE (S) BE M ADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? U YES 2 NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE l
l l l l l 3. DETERMINE WHETHER Od NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED iS AN UNREviEWED S AFETY QUESTION UlluZiNG THE FOLLOW:NG GU'DELINES. l lA) H AS THE PROB A6lLITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPYENT lMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREvlOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED? C YES bNO STATE B ASIS:_1Md *- Ad _ b., td b
- k' 11A M 2 1 um_a A uNm epj i M sJ ciya n y r_ .r.A Q h tu '
y N Nr2 m, fem p v o
\w.
181 H AS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR Y ALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE TH AN ANY EV ALUATED PREvlOUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? C YES X NO STATE B ASIS ) - E iC) H AS THE Y ARGIN OF SAFETY, AS DEFINED IN THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPEC;FICATION OR IN THE FS AR BEEN REDUCED' C YES 1 NO STATE BASISab 3 M.
~.
DOES THE ACTIVITf APPEAR TO INVOLVE AN UNREV;EWED S AFETY OUESTION C YES I NO
,Y BY
- _ c...
APPROVED -
>* f -
_A , 4 x.- ' 5orm .C 3' C2 33a2
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
') SerylCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN /M N ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. _ U T- l ' 6 /* 5_
PAGE /d' CATEGORY - . TYPE: - CN Overall Z CN Submittal @ 7FSf k@puei
/
Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site **eas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or prcvious plant operation? g Yes Z No State basis (h' e d@_1 e sd4O k & d _h
- ls the activ ty required to achieve compiiance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? Z Yes M No Applicable Regulations _
h 0 TE: Jf e ther anssens Yes. the act vtv aces not sc%e an unrev eses envronme'.ta) cuest on S gn and care the form. If ectn sessers are M the act:vtr- has the pctent:al ter creat ng an unres esed eneronmentat auestcon. Como ett the rema.naer of th>s esa%at on fctm. a ALUATION (Use additionaltheetsif requirec0 1. Is the activity identified in the fina: environmental statement (FES) Z Yes Z No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 31? Identify documents and document sections rev:ewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
Ilf the answer to any of the followirg quest;ons is Yes, then this activity involses an unreviewed envircnmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State bas:s (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant :ncrease in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power les eP Z Yes : No State basis (C) Does th:s actiuty involse an enuronmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES) Z Yes Z No State bas s Does the activity insois e an unreviewed enuronmental quest,on? Z Yes Z No By fd ~ ! u..... ., _11](:b(a___ Approsed grLM,__ ... ..
"P __ .
C dd
- jm 6 M
- FC'RT ST. VRAIN NUt, EAR GENER ATi'lG S', U*:ON PUbli O $grylCO: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLQRADf7 b ~ / ,'Y[] '
PROCEDURE DEVIATION HEPORT PAGE I 0F /
'*gcyvy,Np,_,pssusNo. TirLE g, 7. ,,, y ,,y,, (, w ,,j pg ,,, g QQNg 0# CHANGEDFROV C:. ANGED TC REASON FOR CHANGE 3 3', ? A,/ fp) ll YA //~'/ / */ /W A d V fd It* ^ s 7~/ sf C $$f.dVA 71CP 7?/A Y /* /t//JJ / llf 80 /=,sdy, ,
s4/C .IN iT///sd/ FAY C A / /s /st> #9 f fg f,7-= 8/A sif ^J /) lNf/4. 44 7C fr w ft'7//WJ ,*f/* d fr7/9 M C'/Nfc' 5 V
,4 S /AA2 77/?? -
go, /J /Wie w /s /
/ln /) 7?/t9?"~ A ' C.-
f : 17)^'? ! i4rd C , T/ b //X
- I
*Nt T :Afs4 ,
< QAT[
C-- "W / e.-. ~~::s WA' I . , l /Z~ / ') - $6 M*5 C NO IS PROCEDL AE PCRC APPRON ED? DEVIATION CA1EGCRE NEM OR ARY iSnGLE USEl t V 5 : NO IS EQ PEviEW AEOutRED? -CLO.NG PE v ANtNTTERY 0CCF TEY*CR ATT AmY M U.s E-a ets ..
$ 2 NO IS CC REVTW REGU; Af D?
APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED M /YtcATtr U s u s;s & syt t s:aN y cntil- ~~
/ P. /A . M/
' ' ' ~
L \TE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL
/*p N -
j7.i3.g A EN: RED f0n ALL mar %iE% A%CE. nEsulTs. TE34tCAL stE::FICATION SV.Wr/LLANCf. A%D ACVh:STnAT!\f PROCECu*tsl CUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL b 0\ % d2-- - nic. ato w wCar necuints aC on avot s es Tes r:vc on viaTru sCe cv s Artrv atwto rou:wtw '"
\b \ 4 ' 2 G s'
APPR*V@LS l WW 14># . p y Galk GA;E PLAN T M A*jawi&_NI YYA r gn . , V A,N Aut y t N T a T Aq h s: LilC4 i'E R $CM a' ~ ' JC &90N5 . !O-0-0b 0; l E* OATE CATE P R O'C E 0 JR E 'TKUER
,DLA . pa 0%. I ? - l] . ?(p E Y Y' b
(. () U "*T"'""* p'" (L'ENCLQ EgP! A AT GN R65PCNS 841 FG9 PERSGN 041( OA?E
~
PCaC Ml(T;NG NLvg[R CATE L A'iNL LD lxP R AT GN AfdeGNSogiF0dPLAdGN g Daf t l OAT [
~'
P0a C viET.NG Nt.vst a 'DATE 6tiPONS 6L6 FC A Pi45CN OAIE
- i. A *iNO& D LAP R AIieN OA'E f PCRC YEETtNG NvYBER ~ 3 ATE l
m x uss mit. Ain . :. u.: := ~ Te F ..: c ,.. i m : ::,s To ..s: :.. u N u f. AT:: be. c:,is c. ai as Ni:issi.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
. SOrVICOE PUBLIO SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / , of _I Equipment Number $/ n tar _A 17A [d./2 / 8gc WM/#-/, 2j S ' ftFtERENCE DOCUMENTS Equipment Name Sczysf rA fy's<* 0 & M Manual Equipment locarron # L I& /. ##l'M Lp v' - SSR No.
Insoection Type ( / 7' NCR No. Work to be Performed dC7 CWP No. 6/- - 29 2-CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT Other W 2/8/'s CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION ITEM $ NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE 0C - _sco, poi l en. sw- l
&-er iy I i .
I i I
~
l } l DIM ENSION AL3h P ECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F I A/L i QC I j i I I I i I i o i i > l I ! l V - p
- i i l i ,
I I i i l i i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Appi cable DC Numbers Below: i i i ! l Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): C Stop Work C NCR C CAR [ Tagged Comments Qggdhbygs)l _ W GriAj fi, KZy 42/1 o . j}lgyX ' f j],0 b L}t _C $n) [AiA/[< ? bh ? Y (3 2 fb E_f f) (b /10lI h& _ l &)h) M ESAS$A E$$2)) h /C)YJlfhf Nin/A - . Yd4CA - 4_tj2p> c e L1sDx b= 1 og bn/ n M. DLp Aap l]HJnrI
;Jn>As=+
_ ALMT.MA1 A l l l i j l 1 l t I l
$O fM --
) / Test (s) Ccmoleted SatisQctory. M Z No th0 Main and reference acchcabte 9hcuments;n comment section.
Inspected B IMI j' M, Date -2
.c, , c: = sw(j
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SOrVICOr PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of _f__ Equipment Number 'i~5 d ,_6 7,j 4 . M 4 3 S I'S 9' 3'2 / 4 2 4 9 2 A REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eauipment Name 3*etgn> rep d LEn5 0 & M Manual Equ;pment Location L,nve L M %AA _Ri tri h - SSR No. Inspectron Type CE,T' NCR No. Work to be Perforrred VattcExt_b W QaAX CWP No. bb 9f-CAL!BRATED EQUIPMENT Other.GEDl S D V. E '/. c p_o CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION W'E* 'I' ITEMS NUMBER EXP! RATION DATE QC X _._o s I
=- ? , - I I I DN.
DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA I A/F I A/L QC
! I
- d. I l !
_. ! ! N , I I I ^N , I
. _!. I N
Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Apolicable DC Numbers Delow: l i 4 i I , Quality Control Actiona Utilized (Check): C Stop Work C NCR C CAR E Tagged Comments H YW.GTFD Ai M H is_Na'n<MA Ai / An/)/hic lgAsDM71CPED u _ Ntf5/Qf%) ErdtA7' >/s)fs A fs'+) Ll))L5;Jrpsh SAA fkwnr3 97]E>w
&a D NmMxgp t106#6 DR
- 6L. %L _
af.wr
) $dd){fb Odb2k bh)- $L l k b h&dCAxsp \MxD DA). 9 L. 9 L [
~
Dr.QcMfb UMQ DthBh-3bl k@ggg4#6 ddgE hM-E-SL b f M Jgpfp _ %~A' Anla w nb 'Y Ethn hhD~154,_k!i#1 e
.h )f & k. h.n} (Arrik'Mi3 TN2thp)
$$2 M _bhL4of ? NRu)0hyGOL)Mbr.k DU#2hjfis $)htgDn) S p A & D r rl f f} f s) w c'75s6iect185R ' Y[st(s) Completed S atuf actory Mes Z No _
if No. expiain and refesence applicach documents in comment section. Inspected B, e.u L d Date /~~/b Fopf.' B 372 2.2 '237
t a mo 64 mm e s <w w m rm .o PVlt.lc SERY1Cf CouPANY Of COLORADO FORT ST. YR AIN NUCLE AR CtHERATlHC STATION hocedure k. EB 8-DISCREPANC N0ilCE CWP NO. m NO , ITEN/ ACTIVITY 86-292 86-366 CN 2181 CWP 86-292 WIRING DWG/5 KETCH TAG YES LOCATION AL NO VARIOUS N/7 x X SAFETY RELATED H0ll-SAFETY RELAT20 DISCREPANCY DURING REINSPECTION OF WIRING ON CN 2181 CWP 86-292 THE ELLOWING LUGS WE3E DUh3 BAD.
- 1) / )A CABLE 28330 AT J-1156 d) JUMPER AT TB-1LO5 PI 7 VB) CABLE 28338 AT J-1157
- 4) CABLE 26350 AT TB-603 Pr 74, 75 (I-10) 2) CONDULET FIITING AT TSV-5214-2B IS VD) CABLE 28349 AT TB-404 FI 78, 79 (I-10) LDOSE e
E) CABLE 28337 AT JB-1015 FI 2 (BLK COhTOCTOR) n cALLe 2033: AT TE CG3 FI 7 '. , 73 U-10) F,. s e H- M'MIM D!24 A) CABLE 28333 AT TB-1004 Pr 73, 74 (I-10; QC INSPECTOR DA'T E' DISPOSITION
- 1) REPLACE LUGS ON CONDUCTORS AS OUTLINED APOVE
- 2) TIGHTEN FITIING AS REQUIRED
"*6
.a / Mer M4#% 48 # 1
@ bUPLMYlbuK 1212(Iso UAlt DATE W INT. SU y 0JNT 015P0MH6N/ IMPLEMENTATION NGoRK Co -p -W L ,iaxeo jQ M
hUJ A ACCEPTABLE C. /. //64 # h, iNr1 COMPLETE m // DATE QC INSPECTOR MAINT, SUPERINTENDENTAMTE
" BACK UP DOCUMENTATION REMARKS CCWLETE AND ATTACHED
( % M ,4,/,_A,,-4 v/La DATE QC INSPECTOR REVIEW AND DATE APPROYAL @ SUPERVISOR
I E3ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED lC'n'P Ch'- 4 f f' / NUMBE?. REPORT NUM3ER GENERAL INSPECTION I 6tv/- F6 - A M N-M3 REPORT STEP NUMBER 70, 6jo f 7, 6.3 s in, 71R, 4 7 DATE f2.g_g ITEM DESCRIPTION / 5 oM (ea Dv d d d r M -- P4 -E 6 1.0 CATION Cw-f,., / g m l v. 7 E REFERENCE DRAVINGS leF 6. l.y 6 -33,. (- ~4 3; 9 y o,re g. ( of/ g6.. y f 6 } g .yf yf - INSPECTION DETAILS wkne s s< D T h e., f*ollow,',oir sT< fS i~o r A. ( Ise s ,a te g <, a lv o C o d D u c T o r s
,aso b <., C.~ Tr<l Am . i v. 7, C e b L c.S A rc., --
%T<? ~ 70 Csble ao.AD49 AT 70 404 PT, 7 f, 7 9 (.T-ls) C o,v7'esl g,,,, L,.;-
%Y< P- 4 0 Caet.v no. A C F0 AT'~ra G03 9 7 71,' 7/* ty.,p) (,4,g ,
% T< f - 8 7 ~J'u en ge e er -r s > o o f PT. 7 ( Z- 10) C , n 7,,, j g , g_ , , 7 sr < p . y 3 e a s 19 no. A 1333 nr T 6 s o o 4 /T* 73, 7 9 I.T to) C eario) gm. y 7, 3rc / - (,14 - c401 evo. AP33o AT 7 0 - // f 6 / C /, A. T vr o/l'< t v. f c lf,
/ T. I, .1. . Y < r o ,L <. L ,r..c 6. y 3 r< P-1s A e e o t.s no. a r3 3 F ss 7 78 - !!! 7 src P- G 7 c o o t <. n r. 1 93: 7 AT, T D -to i f" /T. .;t.
f ol k- crutsiac o~ o uc?'li- ) L y.r f; c c s / M 42 c ,
.1~~ , s p < < >>en os for Go 7-H ,
w.a r c e . jp < < iu ss , c. - s'G , c. - 3 7 - s o l o v e. - l - f-17 , w ;, sTe p pts - ao. s- yo -eatov- i - i~-17 e ; I a DATE DATE QC SUPEP'. R ' l QC INSPECTOR /7 )) n _ o.1.st-ft - 1 6 G1 m
d 9 12;.5C0 SI?.7ICII I'iCO????). I")
- SWE b-M y_ggi; hm_g, cI';I?>.I. n:5?IrIcs (Ctl 2160 8'7-;2/pg i 7.nC;.: S:I? rc.c:I?. :3 I l 47A :t/z/r7 hllRk' of I'W L& CenbutzrfilThk. m 7sv-s2/4-2 b r Ei DISC 11?!~CN -
1.CC.C CS LCvEl 5"(7ur.B.h con en Al- C, /tal-4 RITIRI';CI DRA'aT;C3 e62J.4 '/. s E325 8 8h. faze.s % . EE2r.7% h ed.tc-1(,4
- 5S?ICTIcN DITAII.S REuJotx. of dDAlbuls7" AiTNR. (L8) rb 75t/.32/6 2,6 tem gggg AS Ru.atas . :
1.) C A
- 2 8.5 3 7 uJM MTCEAnaATED A Y 3 b -10/5 l &LK TledPE'2l khr. - 'Tf.xan.
Wc */2). .br< u tr . 2.) C A *2tn1 u)AS IUU.BA<e A'en 3 6. tots awTb Cseltats r l'irrWr. sr nti. sz,4a AlVD doiLLo, 2d ben Du LLt- l~e TrNJL. tdM T/C M Ts rILD 70 T S t/~ 52/4 -2. Ad LA# l&S 3 7 u.)M RLndLfD fNea Cs40uts+ /7 77tka A y TS tt.S~2ill--2b ruTo .T8-/cis-
' D CA
- z.tM ~1 WAs eLTreneArs a rn .c rs cec,odia m prs,
.rusnessad Ac.u.p TAst.1 5
l i l l l l OAU
,O INS?I'!C1 DA Z QC SL7IRVISCR L 4 wk+,/uc- l-2-37 _ -- 1-6-C
.- -- ~ -
TO AT J IM PAIMOtS EBASCO Sus >Ecf DATE C r4 2.\ 86 C LJ P S c 2_9 2_ \ 6 'l D U C1 t M G C2. E. V i E LV O C: ATTAcucD GC t a s P rc 77 OMD SI8O Mb N(i Fo tt.oua c Acr( od k46 74<e4 PLAC6 ITcM l oG T.f2 . DATab L '2.. t 7 - S C. . tJ c A CT(o A) . Pf2c c c O wRC ALLOW $ G a.coi 4 ( &Mc vt At c No Ad o/tc TRM *t o". ITG M ~2. TugY T. r EA G,
$GC A TTAcac o CLosca Od G . richt ~7 (S rc I ran \\ . Tre n G TAC 4 Rc A4 cvs b T Td A et t4 t R 6 7 - o cr., G w f2.Aret> T7EM 10 GEE O .d .
lYcM lt C o 4 0 ., c v o n.6 w cAC MtrAs vrur O MO (:owas in Ge A c.c c PTA n te A4 Ocp P-AVcH u stNci a a cri a c. O s n trc.T ( c ,.J . T. 52. OA7co ( 2. - i &- GG X11M t n< na a Sec hTrAcwo C> A. T rcn 5 No A c.rto 4 OR Awns (4 9 cv /) PH MAcAL. 4^ .*? ' 3d O raw id e. RJ A u n J1 t WCo O t Ac W-SGNED CC' L . P A. ( t c' l l l l OSTE SIGNED 1 l un'@v_'s 45 4 74 SENo PAars I ANO 3 INTACT . POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P474 I PART 3 wnt sE aETURNED WITH aEPLY. l
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public Sorvicot PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPEOTION REPORT Page f of l
'j
. Eau:pment Number "T~$ /.f2/N _.7$ 9. 94 -
'7f/ _G/4 - 24 %/ h REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eauipment N nme Sol ederrn //\J.Vf r 0 & M Manual l
Equrpment location Wh / T/Addd4j.A SSR No. Inscection Type C T' NCR No. Work to be Performed JkrF.TJf,M_ SZGt[fM CWP No. 84 - 2, TL CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT Other M/Al-! Ap7 p f.Ogg CAllBRATED ITEMS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CAllBRATION EXPIRATION DATE QC W 5 b' o' I l
? ?l '_f90 . -l 1
a - ,, i i ! I h DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i QC i i
! I x
! i ! i l I I I i l l i !
l Verif y Proper Materital Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
! I I I I i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check):
O Stop Work O NCR O CAR C Tagged Comments
& Q Q n6MC $x/ /)rrs}/*wAb ~7~h t 4't*TTt'AJ ffs47)i7 A41/1 A>'sn) $ca%syEA
_1}x)/.x2._1jn!w'/d11l'- , ./ d8."QcAK M bd b
. $f_, 3 b (,s h b ,2 n k % k h UbEh h$ AY CC_6 ft2r b)<ED \ AlbN D f L -]lal
~ \,1
~
& &ckXAn Oguk DF" RL-2 6 6
$1* f*9 7 b & F_n S A)~ &1V >aw']) 'YYL~mn
~ _ /
V (nsoectiontsjTest(si Completed Satisfactorg Yes Z No II .7v. e uplain and refennce applicable docGnidnts in comment section. _ f inspected By fouq13/ _ eM g:* [ Date [/
.- . - -, y /
1 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC SerVICOe PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page I ofj__ 3 Equipment Number T"f_y' p_'"4'.j d i9 .3 B TS/-R/ d ' 34 9-ZA REFERENCE D0CUMENTS Equipment Name _6hl/derb AkyES; O & M Manual Equ,pment Location Lg gL 5 l A A.-[)JL Lp. SSR No. Inscection Type C C.. T NCR No. Work to be Performed CWP No. 3/a - 2AE other M 7.181-f CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION i CAllBRATION QC ITEMS NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE , b&t+-QSud W - O'5
. IO~0f I i l l } )
l I i I DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE CF MEASURdMENT i CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i QC I I ! : I i i i l i I I I i ! l I I Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Apahcable DC Numbers Below: r i t i
}
Quahty Control Actions Utilized (Check): C Stop Work C NCR C CAR Z Tagged Comments
$ktkV f.k3~ W L C1.:7 Fcs.ucuirJr. T'-r e ms p}cks'. %adba
,v h ('setz R2.So kr Tb t,oA T?. ' 7& 'Ls- SPJ Loss
,V (2Lihhf 293.9 7. tW T&LG2 ~~T* h $Z'62 25_8AO A IM <
.. ) RcaAsp 29992 Dr7 Alm -KA '9299/ k)B car 4 e
- The -rA mcf MA "9 Rod " rd /cs12 fisD AAJ unna '
GSwn _cognetui).% O BCN Gd W175 Q)),
' ~
I'f j g / h
' ~
(rAlpdC1"CE # 7A-1ff9 f2/}- Of YA.jtYH K A #1 2. _L F / r S 1 112 &s11t]Ias/4_(2 tea rs LjalDgp dJ Arsar 1-= 1,x. i
.m /
( (nspectioni/, ' Test (s) Comp!eted Satisfactory. . Yes VNo j
,I iMlain and refe_rence acr!%a2.tumants in comment section.
Inspected By .7,.t.dM tr C 11 Date ) 2 - b b- bt _. e . e r::: sm y
I
- W. J.
. .'s (
t i, ,/
, l i. . . . - ,
,* ; i * ,
p g. I' 4 v. '- (
's e
L' a Tu AT ,
> lof PA c.40 i 5 E 9 o sTo SUSJECT DATE (M 2 % bl (WP $ 4 2 9 *2 I* b - U D V O t ^) G (2. E.V i C LA) OF A rT Arsc D GC 'a>^ccT349 a c~ oo cr6 m, '
VO L L. O w n.) G OCTs O r) VA$ "T~,A < w* l P! , h( (. - if
- 37CM I o f" 10. . ..DATCD* t2 iT- E (o Mo A C 'T t C A) PCoccDmoc A t.g. ow $ fi 0
#= L N 0' 4 C.
OMC 'T- ' M C A o M ot2C W A) 9 0". ( "7T f_ ^ t ~2- WCM "L ' I
- f /-. N k . .
3
\
f.' h C C A7TMV,Ot C.LoSC"h.' -DA.Y$ T 7 ' 11 7
. 6CC i 7 At i1 7 TI At 6 h p ,- x < . . % * ' A T. /, QC AaoVC D T T d A1 9 bdC D -C - o ct., 6t. c ? S c L3 T'(8 iG C:, C. C Q PJ ;4 t YC A1 1% / o -J O -n , o 2 6 wcG M tc N o c Q MO f~o s o % At A < f c "T ^ 4 t C A4 O C *: R A W/ W C 44 E' e % u c e ti >J G
_ O s Q t t i
- o ~} .
I2 C A 7 C. D 11 \ C - 66 T 1 C. M l ru '2 V LI bCC O 7 ? N d e' D C ^b. T T d ^f 6 BJ O A ' T ' O ^3 C7AWNG
'4 N oT A Ibb%' CAL C*EE " NDCAusta C= .T vi A L,a i 0 e ~G Oe A,. e t.~4 1 e l s
, ,,, % , . , , . .4 A. . . .. . 4
. . . . ~
s CC L. PR t C C \" V
\
N ' .. l \ ' e l ! (V ! i l l l a -- l w-Out StGNE D
..- \
8 i
/
, ewz, 45 474 seso rAus i Aso 3 isTAcT - POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P474 l PART 3 Witt St RETURNt0 WITH REPLY. l t
- i C . t $ 1. Y T. 'J;; . ")O. J .'... (c s. ' J f '.*i t; . 0 ;i t i :,;;;
_01SCREMNCY N0ilC( CL'P H O. m H0. i..M/ACilYlTY CN 2181 RDERK FER CCI/FT Ch'F 86-290 87-COS ' DNG/5 KETCH TAG YES LOCATION APPL 1EO No N/A - Y LEVEL 7 (MAIN CO m CL ROCt0 HON SAFEW RELATED
/ SAFETY RELATED DISCREPANCY DURING FERFORMANCE OF CCT/FT THE FOLLOWING UNACCEPTABLE LUGS WER
/./ 1.) CABLE 28332 AT IB 603 FIS 74 & 75 (I-10)
D! S .. deUo) Ik/f TCINSPECTOR D'(ff-OlSP05111CN P.EPLACE IIGS ON COND' CIORS OF CABLE 28332. NOTE P015TS AND CO REU.ND TO S/JE POISTS. CPICR TO LIFIING CONDUCIORS.
~ Its T~
' ?N D157051 T 10N/ :.MPL E.MEhi AT ION
/- /. ;-
//.h{
ACCEPTMLESAAh/.4%QsflD C O.'? t.E T_E _'2.e@c CaiE QC INSPECTOR VAINT. SUPERINif,)fthi MT E BACK UP CoctF.ENTATION
- RetGKS CO'?L ETE l
A!O ATTACHED
/shbiA'&%Es AD /-7 CdTE QC Il5PECT02 FEY'EV t.ND :,.# S J :, - r a f[a l,@: ~
, ; , - ~ .; q
- ~
y- _~---
- .. . . . . . > . .. :,5 u
.. K r.i ST. Yr..C:t I:.'Ct.C /.R G D:U.>.Tir:0 si.' To F re: :.re EE CE.7
~
,I-............. QUALITY CChift0L lh5PECTION REPORT CASLE TEFF.iKATION CHECKLIST J A5'.E IQ'5 ER SEE.YlCE FUN ^ TION P.S.C.C. D0*L' MENT STEP NUMBER REF. Opjl4]N3 g . yjg IF APPLICABLE c28337 , QvJ7D L rd 2/8/ d/d M - S 7 cos CA5'.E SIZE AtiD TYPE EQUlFMENT LOCATION
,,, $b~ /.? M X'1 % -/'O (b47Xb& Eboi/ t'exc. ~7 t i :.M.
NC. .c, ;ED t; 1 Cables r0;*.ed, bundled, and supported '
/
2 Cable se:eration f 3 Cable ider.tification f 4 Cables te mir.ated per latest issue of P.S.C.C. co:usent / 5 Mininun :a:!e bend radius (nanuf a .ures s;e:ifi:ations) / -- A. A.n
, s. t...i. ..
s * : . ....2 . : r.ig) g r,.2 . .rc.
....e 4 2..
..v 2 ..
..... j.. 3...
. . . . gri-i.na
. 3 e . c. . .e . e. . .p. :. - . . . ..::.. ::
. . .. .-.... .. " e 7 Cable insu:ttion and te minals :! san & ur. dana;ed ! .-
c r.,.-- . .. *. *..
. a. .vas.. * ...i n.a l o r c. -vt. .i - . .< =. u. . . . a ' . . . - ." a.
. . . 2.. a- ..
1 ' . .>.
- 1. v i r a.
SI?9 9 Cri :ing, wire insertien, dot cde er cries ::de . t 10 installati:n f Eay:r.e: Heat Sr.rir.k Or: ducts [ 11 533re c:n:u-10rs sealed [
- o. .2 . 3. s ,. .i ...
4.. /
. 7 . ...... y,.l... .. d p x.t.n . a.. .. 9. . c. .. . . +g,.
.. l /l l.,
.. l . . .. .. .. .. .. .. ., .., ..,.
..(... . , . . 3. ., ,.. .m. . y, .. .... ... 3...;...: . . . . . . . l[ l Ii .. .: I l
\ .
!*A go12 G' 6 it' d 6 32*:' O.li' S Sc7?Ma 73 c2,-;> <rs' Rewo A' I< e f 4.!63, 6 64
- iu, ;y.5 EttMW D 73 , tw.7J* P**:"; K'.G'y' '
77e*^ 'Tb . ! CR.'*. 'N3 TOOL C, So CUE DATE /./y.g 7 ST;;;;ER 5 29 DUE DATE /-/7-6 7 l .C. E' ECTEICAL lh5'ECTOR e(//g. _g4/1.de M.. DATE / G / y. l O
...- .. .z u. .::. . ,. m. p.
- ,J_ __. a;T;. t. .s, "
4 -- l f
' t ! 6 81 < .43
[* ! ..
' i ':. . . . . . . ' .4 .' .. . : ,)
~
- f C A T S T. \ T. AIM 1:'JCL' n ci:nc t./.Tt;:0 ST ATICH I ~3 OlSCREPL'O NQi]SJ CWP NO. EN H0.
1TDi/ACilYlTY 86-292 86-366
~
CN 2181 CWP 86-292 WIP1NG ' CVG/S KETCH TAG YES LOCATION VARIGlS N/7 APPLIED NO
]
X N0!1-SAFETY RELATED SAFE 1Y RELATED DISCREPANCY M' RING RF1NSPFCTION OF WIRING ON CN 2181 CWP 86-292 'INE FOLLOWIE LUGS WERE FCOND BAD.
- 1) A) CAFLE 28330 AT J-1156 viI) JUMPER AT TB-LOO 5 Fr 7 B) CAPLE 28338 AT J-ll57
.<) CABLE 28350 AT TB-603 Fr 74, 75 (I-10) 2) COSTULET FITTING AT TSV-5214-2B IS D) CAPLE 28349 AT TB-404 Fr 78, 79 (I-10) 1.f0SE 4 f e E) CAFLE 28337 AT JB-1015 FT 2 (PLK COSTOCTOR) ,
-r)-sFLE-eM32 - AT -To6034r-M , M ( Mffr J',.'s s1 J/L -//%[ 21114UGL/MI'.
, G) C.AFLE 28333 AT TB-1004 FI 73, 74 (I-10) =QC 1h5PEC10R 08E' DISPOSITION
- 1) REPLACE LUGS ON CONItCICRS AS OUTLINED ABOVE
- 2) TIGFTD; FIITIE AS REQUIRED
' E
,? r, / _g -)g
//s /b C'
. \)I:tist l
' 9.G NT : TUP 3L%
f iT- Wt' M bitAYIWR 'W{ 01SP0H Kfk/ IMPLEMENTAil0N e ji s L'.:Fc C:- p G Me anxim jff rA
/
W '/M'7
. v6 b ,'g ,7 ACCEPTA3tE n, /. #, ..S rQ.
f C 1".0L E T E QC 1RSPECTOR MT E l'Al'ii. SUPERINTEN2ENTAMIE V EACK UP EOCQ'iNTATION l~ REF.G X.S CC9LUE ARD AriACHED j
%.c s.~ ? . l- tf a ni < *
- A'.fj.cil_.
OATE l QC IRSPECTOR l . I rey 1EV OD
f*',-
w w o m a _ .&__ T N:S ut t
EI ASCD SEF.V!CES ism-R F).7ED a? I'ME A d' ' ' 21 f' / FI?CFT :. M ER G BE?>l INi?ECTIGN j_ C Sv / ~ P G - A f .2 . g _ ,<)g.] ~ U70?I I STEP W.'2ER 70, 6 0, f 7, 4*.3 4 /4, 7 //?,4 7 /A .2. 1 - )' d lDATE ITD'. DESCF.IPIICN 5 #' ## # #3 ~b b LOCATION C,aT',.,/ gm /,v.7
? lie?.ENCE DF. WING 5 h F* c -A Y 6 - 3 3,. C. - 9 3,,9 y ,gye ;, (p,;.f(,3[g,)(..qgyy INSPECTION DETAILS ve,'r ~esr< D tao f~e lie la te sT< f5 For 6 f al c.e , a fe ge s
/y)3
*H C c a o s c Yo ; S ,a s o l> o C w T i r } d' m . L v. 7. C t' b L c S A rc. :
sT<P.- 70 Cs0Lu ao.AD49 AT 70 404 97.77,79 (7-jo) Co nTesl h. L/ 7. s Ys P- G o c a c t o, n o . r t' 3 f D ATo'**3 ! T' I b 'I II- lo) Co a 7,,/ /,. .Li.7
. T< f - g 7 Te mp< c ar -r s . s c o f' PT.1 ( Y 10) Ce~7,oj gn, t. q . 7 sr < P - G 3 ( n b 19 " ' - *I333 "'T6*4 I l's lV lT*!') ' ' 'T I d " I r' 7 A 7' 7 O ~ Il f(* f I' f, 2, 7 ve cilrg i y, f ( y,
$- < f - G A . c + o I<. a c . LV330 3 < P ~ll A c e ole. n o. .x y)] f A T 3'J - sti 7 / T. I, .2. . Tvr0,Lt L /. f~ C. y s rc 9- G 7 c e o ie. n s. 17337 27, 7 D -ie '.r* /7". 2
( of K- crv<oim. >~o vG*i- ) L y r6 A cc s/ & AEG-f,,, , , , e f ', .e ss 9 l
/
- f* H fo GdM' c .nype, a ss , c - >% , c. - 3 7 - ' ' l D v c
.. n
. , , s 7,. , pp - ao . S- no -eal OvG- i f'.f 7 .
s I l DATE QC INS?ECTCR DATE QC 5"?IF'.S R l k l ! 2 1 9 -fd' 0. wx _ _ (*'E'G) c-l l -- - - . . . _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ , , _ _ , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , _ _ _
~
. . ;_, e.a s . . . , . .. . . I :;c s . .u. . .:. . . .,
c'-? h*?2D A'0* N - .: b .i tra c n. cr.rn.2.!. I:.:: .. c: (CU 2160 8'7 -;24, -
-.r:- c- , ,,ce n, i ~' '~
\^ .
674 i/z/r 7
.. _, D u. . . .: .:... ., ., ..
%kW d I"d L8 Ce~wcirMirAk. m rs v.szi4 2 s 1.C C.C ~ C'; LCVG1 s~truR.B.h Co m o . d - C. /kl. 4 7.5TI? D;C5 D?X T;G3 f.S11 4 'l s EE2C-G 'ln , SE 21.5 % . [A2 c.7 % h bJ.?? -14
~ ;5?IC ION DITA ~I.S REtdct.t. o f dan:>uts.7- 6mVG. (ts ) ro 7sv.su4,. 2.6 u)RS PdEReuGB A S Fe~ u_ow s . :
.s.3 C n
- 2 6 5 3 7 du :'*irDm?. RED A r 3 b -
- S W
- W 0 * * ' O '** * -
( 2/c " /2 ) . MM47 '. 2.) C a
- ztn1 vJAS Iuu. B At e ft: A 3 6 l&I5 #MI~& Cle.'N t.t. t* A17*>R. A r rs ti. .rb n .;
AtVD d as/Lo , 2.) $ e e2 C a L Lt= l', Trs")( td M Tin N T* d& b r0 T $ tl- S*l/ 4 L 0 *D l h ' IES '$ 7 UJ f* % IllMf O Rea C.c n%g a,+ ;; n.kr. A r TS L/.h'ZILL.23 ruTO 58./ cts-
.c) Cs a .rf.3 5 ~1 l'J45 ;rtriee w a rs. O rr, .t rs c%:Jir.t m ;>75,
.:" U % D re 1*[e a.J A*t_/,,,p 7 /.J.g.Ar 4
I i e c :r; .%.se '. 'a'*
.. .......... .A.- t,
- *-- :*3
.. . .,d t : . . . e. ,
g-7 ( f
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SOrVICOe PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT page / of ./
Ecu;oment Number 'f>(tf- 62/9 8 W_ g/ .6 2. / V - / 3 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecu pment Name SoLEAjo/D M d ki/ N 0 & M Manual Al/A Equ;pment Location '70 g ujG L \/- 65b SSR No. A//A Inspect:en Type M d6 kL/S NCR No. A//d Work to be Performed S TirP S. cT RBf 76 -/95 3 07 CwP No. f/o - 272 O CT 2/b'l'I r CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT G Othe/d 07/// CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION OC 7 - 6 '/ 3 ITEMS NUMBER EXP! RATION DATE
'Nl _
i X IM/R !
~N i
!N i i
i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION N -N i PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA i A/F i A/L QC N I ! I i NI i i I A iAl /A I XI I i A i i I
~
! \ !
I l h l I I I X i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: i I I I I i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Cneck): O Step Work O NCR O CAR O Tagged Comments _ wi r.de=ssa!3 e rep & 2 cc Oc i~ 2/8/ P&R PD 2 24 - 19s3_ l VisuAu.g VEKi P t erb MI A T A LL E A1 S r20M GM A 02 $ 1 %) Et rM4 TTL 0 t .s .IA) t=a riojJ S _A 2<?" /iaRLeGTLV '.rs)srk ?.c-73 l Nat' YM Ga)P DA%i AS 6 7-H A' r A & l.- ht ir7d& S A Le~ r76& r". S 6 LEA 1016 70 & A)& h5"i pic=73 LUe%=~l T5 J- 52 l-3 -1 TS U KZl b -l-l Trs-5Z/Y-44 n J -52/ 4 - 16 TS V 62/V- 2A m & GZl4 - 2 th h ti-5214 3B VSO-s214- 3b inspection (s) / Testist Completed Satisfactory. )(Yes Z No if NO. emplain and refgrence aoplicable documents in comment section. Inspected By _ - thALp Date / L @ rony s.v::: mi Q
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC
) SerVlCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO .,
QC INSPECTION REPORT Page i of [ Equ'oment Number TSj,52_f_ht/2418 T4y', d/V 2 A 4 2_ A REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eauipment Name Sa m des- 6 W h_V A < 0 & M Manual Eqwpment Location L, rVc t .S ' -70AA. IS and l - SSR No. Inspect.on Type (.C_ r- NCR No. Work to be Performed CWP No. 6 h - 29 L Other CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CALIBRATION EXPIRATION DATE QC ITEMS NUMBER fJLgQ- l$/7)[ , 00b 4 S' W j f m f,$pj2/ W *%fb"
! W- N,Y ff^
- iW l lW l ! I i ! I i i i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT CRITERIA l A/F l A/L l QC i l I i l I i 1 l
I
-u l 1 ^Q l i i i N_ '
j ' ' - i l . Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: i i l i i I Quahty Control Actions Utilized (Checkl: U Stop Work U NCR t_, CAR U Tagged Co ments tL @ _ EET41kte s af r, Q.7 Fouc h 4 __Tw w d ' wha J 0-R, O___& . AasA
)_fh Th GPf (CcdD2cra "12mm-ob LM A w % Tsa.n.O -: f L(( }f]s D}blW Z V-?Sf,l sLYg.$_$ $ _ YA_L*/A M 01A b W?
p_p,-12 ur7 ( n aj,s " 2 9'3 2 6 L va : JAn's %daumr:n.) Dazzuisi a apr n A t, c3 -r' tY/f GdL>' "?EM~C Bah ( Arm,P J '!hkjQ0A YYQG Y9 {45]A 'ISY A WS } $ fAIkU.,$MA'l hWAb! l gLa #1ots TP z c4an 52 P aM Arx Gem L o s He hrx.cs Damus,_ f29r_ sher TP 4.waM-h+ciume% =b
, $Muh_dAS_11udA /)rd 'TS//f'/, 64.F M 917 p_Dr_c2 4338B (ms ulh>m, n TA.s2?,) Rcl hy HAs _RRuxsd Banssk-
- I /k 2 b ( C O M M ~L < kQJ2Sg. /
nsne c tioni s) Testis) Ccmoleted Satisf actory. ~ Z Yes VNo [ Main and reference applicatW4uments in comment section. Inspected 8 /2 A.f.,, M C Date /2" -'*/ F_I:".__
~ .. .
.:= a y
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 7. of ( Servicena PUZLIC CERVICE COMPANY CF COLORADO QC CONTINUATION INSPECTION REPORT EQUIPMENT NAME/NO. T6 v'-f2/ //. 9/] 9d/? TS/, ._4'2 / e/ . ? A q- 7 /3 p Foe "T3;Y' _6 '7 M -3 b (E A f d m S P t.T e s:S) C4Aus 7 c3 4 Q A RLAcM Cndot&& *Tn t!n'n/L\nk kht' rArL A A-n)n /}rW. rif 9 p) A t,+- C&otkYek 5 k nfbpk C+. w cA 1 L NC77)EL ped. ~/DA "
! 13V-17 /J/- 2 A l' AA>1 tr2 R3 q o
'R u v x' ri,r m.]rk w / % VsMwl Pror2LCL /4-kn)rL ))M) : J f)/
/S /))-rf-X (p,JDgJr1r y ~ll, VM,2k1A4 A-A nirs . _A.arAz's _As 51. , Md'
19 ~7'W _d'2)6 2 A A
~r D A) M z E t t 9' n - M ?"
fr . skiu'/)t>1 l'r%fn1"/. F6_;rifrL DrA , /DV ' _j$j 9e/r rr.,,n3ilweA
& n-rx- Nisawre A fe t%&A Prs:nzrf l&nnin- 'Dra fu t'
[d TSl'$7 /W-10 tAArn"2Agz9 - _ , . . - . . - AlMX fn!13& -rc/2 %< t4onV'D if&M1rL /f);n1z-L. DrA . jDJ ' '
?</werh ?nsiyik;wd % l%&$ /4-Ar>ari- ,i%rAn l}re . HA
W Pa:rs.r a fce &sc. -c;c u >,2 ,-n tS h a a c Atna i,tbcr- ecn g>O i 4 l 4 l l Inspected By v u+t>A ,
. (46rf . Date 8-/ 7- N
- t 5 '.9 8' 372 22 CM t/
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SOrVICOS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO l QC INSPECTION REPORT Page i of / ,
Ecu pment Number bCV - . REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Equi oment Name .S c. / r m n>] MilVer 0 & M Ma uat 8/4 Equipment Location 'T ,,,b: a e ~ 6 /./j Iv fJ $ SSR No. //ll Inspect:en Type DQ , NCR No. UN Work to be Performed S/( t$ / /S M CWP N . MS other d C T~ d I f I CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB RATION NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC ITEMS , _
,_g E i enfy o r & ?tr I [1 45~ hT I N- f I W.
! t If
! ( !
I i I i I j i I i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i QC I l i i / I ! l u M --4V A J ' ' i
' I 18-/1 lMf6 I I
/
/~/ i
[ l I I I i I
/ ! I I i f i i l i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
1 ! l I l 6 Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): E Stop Work O NCR C CAR [ Tagged Comments ge or m_ C CT Co ,- P Of T DI 3 + PC V Tal4- l , 3,+ 3 n a n . . . . . > { % Form ed h ,'hsl ch e n s" 3 C.~b r C. C A m- Sc ie nc:d va lves T C V. T'3 ( 3 - I i T S V f bl'l- 3 ? TR V ( Q l '4 - 18 ' a- MV c a l'l- l /( M ,r, s r w '. n u i d > -< re at L-I230 h G- 4 C + L ! ?D o n C- W ,
- s l CCt br O T- CO M Pi E'! E I
I l l I 1
&~ a f'nspection(sf ' Testisi como!eted Satisfactory. 3,M es -' N o l Y 0 machentifef*nce applicab'eviocuments in comment section.
. j inspected By _ Date !2 b'
. - , _ . , , y, e
e
, , FT- 2181_3 Page 1 of 3 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION M S';fVICC'" PUZLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF CULCRADD TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: /_i7 FT O CCT O T-Test (CUP 86-292)
Prepared By: D (Preparer)
/'-24 " Reviewed By: dh /o 49 M (Date) (hrpervisor) (Date)
Review / Concurrence: MornokfkA n,MI. Rm
~
10,34 & Q (QA Services)> (Date) Safety / Environmental hYes Evaluation Required: O No . .zer a //-- 7 -74 (Nuclear Lic. - O# rations) (Date) Sa'wty/ Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: h- /2 - 6 6 tTechnical Services) (Date) B 1986 PORC Review Required: /J7Yes O No PORC KORC 7 0 0 NOV 1 NFSC Review Required: O Yes @ No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: a[k ._
///)9Mt (Station Manager) (Date)
Permission to Initiate Test: $ (Shift W
*[. Supervisor) 3 /11/8 7 (Date)
Test Completed: . (Test Concuctody M Wi +/A4
/~(Bate)
Inspection Completed: [4 es 3 / ,p [G1 Supervisor Review:
~
I/ r upe/ visor) (Date) Notification of Test '- fj Completion and Results: // (Snif,4 Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Oate) FORM tCl372 22.M43
..' - 2 1 :.1 - :- rage c- 3 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To verify correct placement and operation of valve actuator XCR contacts installed under SLRDIS.c- !ccr h _
FS so 96 2.0 PRECAUTIONS LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results ___________P_________ Other _______________________ 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test /ex:eriment procecure changes which could affect plant ocerating orocedures upon comoletion of the CN/ CUP. 2.3 None 5.0 PREREQUISITES 31 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date i r _______________ ____________________ ___M____________ 2.2 R+'erences _Jd/ P________________________________________
~ ~ ~
g .FT-2185-5 ~5a;e 3 or o s-4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS . 41 Department Approval _ - __ _____________'__'___7 ' # ~2 _T_. _ Supervisor e# Date 42 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number JJhb_ 4.3 Radiation Ucrk Permit issued, if required: Number ffd__ 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The folouing steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a GC hold point. 51 All DR' s to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP 'QC DR's reviewed: ff,.:S_1'L_k).,f,2/F______________ WITNESS}.f FCINT A? INSPECTOR
!.-n. 9) r dh.:_/_3 U/87 -
ca.e s. w . TNE3S g 3.n.g7 Init. 5.2 Verify ' ali FT's f or CN ~ 417' ve been CiN T *"i 5 "ff 5 "" pa ormed and successfully completed. n d.'.b___ SEE %R*87-14pl A D' Sf r1/87-5.3 Nake a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3 1), include the FT 4. and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. __b p__
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION P d lC S GIVIC O"' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR / S ^R / PC NO.fT-2181'5 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE /"/ CATEGORY - TYPE: { CNOVERALL U CN SU8MITTAL SETPOiNT CH ANGE REPCRT [ TEST REQUEST __. TEVPORARY CONFIGUR ATiON REPORT L_ PROCEDURE CH ANGE tFS AR) L_. OTHER CLASSIFICAT!ON: ARE THE SYSTEMISI EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURESINVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI [YES U NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD [ YES O S AFE SHUTDOWN I YES U NO DLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM X YES U NO SAFETY RELATED Y YES U NO SECURITY SYSTE\1 U YES 2 NO REM ARKS __ 1 OCES THic ACTIVITY AF.cECT STRUCTU AES. SYSTEMS COVPONENTS. EOutPYENT. TESTS. EXPERIVENTS OR PROCEDURE 9 CESCR:BEDIN THE FSAn OR TECH SPECS) X_YES NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED This test verifies completion of FTs from_C.L2176. In itself it doesn't affect any system or equipment. See SE for FT-2176 for _snLa ppl_icable sections. 2 CCES THE ACTMTY REQUIRE TH AT CH ANGEf Si BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC' U YES / NO UST SECT lONS TO GE CH ANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MAOE l l l 3 DE'ERM*.E V.HETHER OR NOT THE ACTmTY INVOLVED IS AN UNREv!EWED S AFETY OUESTION UT LIZlNG THE FOLLOWING GwCELINES i
'Ai H AS THE PROSA8tLITY CF OCCUARENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACC;0ENT OR VALFUNCTION OF EQU;; MENT iMPORTANT TU SAFETY PREWCUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED' Z vES 3 NO STATE e ASIS This test only checks to see if other tests are completed and in itself will not test any system or component. Therefore no abnormal gnade of operation is created and there is no affect on any margin of safety in the FSAR or T.S..
8' H AS THE POSSlafun CF AN ACC: DENT OR VALFUNCTION CF A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED P AEv CuSLY IN THE cS AR BEEN CREATED' S YES / NO STATE BASIS See 3A. i C- H AS TsE Y APGW OF S AFETY AS CEFiNED IN THE 6A$l$ FOR ANY TE^HNtC AL SPECIF:C ATION OR IN TmE FS A R B E E'. R EDL":ED' Z <tS X .O STATE B ASIS See 3A. m Os -E ACwn AnoE AR TO ovCL . E AN U'. A EviE'A E D S AF ETY OUEST:CN $ YES 8 NO eE SArETv SicvF+ CANT Z ~ES Z NO 4 I e .'A4t4 Iu , - 11N6lo . . . ApoAOvED . jl@?._.e
<._ o._.
_ MQ[de'r .
- 71 Q
.,.--,----,--,-n.,.-<-,,, m m-,- m ---n,----- - - , , . _ . , , - . _-_,_.._.-,--,---.-n-- ------- -
P8llC FORT Sf. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
) $OrVICO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN p/ T.M2 /TTl-s C ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO.
PAGE /#I CATEGORY TYPE: C CN Overall C CN Submittal h Ieii keg 0 95 b Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? )(Yes C No State basis {\00 00 e - SUt0 hI -^ ~~ Ro$ i AY b < mn-) w V a d_i Ca' l ~tJ w DmG is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal State or local environmental regulations? E Yes INo Applicable Regulations NO TE: if erther answer >s Yes. the actvty does not involve an unrewesed eneronmental avesr:on. S>gn and date the form. If both ansners are No, the act:wty has the cotent:al for creating an unrewesed enwronmental cuest on. Conwere the rema.nder of this esatuat.cn form. EVALUATION (Useadditionalsheetsif required) 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) : Yes G No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See O-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(if the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? E Yes Z No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power level) ~ Yes : No State tasis (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes T No State basis l - t l 1 Does the activity ins oise an unreviewed environmental question) Z Yes : No by _ lI. (p Ofo_ Approved A/A _. / -~fk_.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public PoR NO. Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO / $ 7 - l y'//,, a . / PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I OF / PROCECURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE j
+ 7 '219l- q - c7 e J )g <t'A < 'rt f m < ~ '!kt vr < W Ped 2s8 < Pe rl ' 10 -I
$hNO CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASdN FOR CHANGE Q C WifN eJ) t/in f h5 7. \/G N / T#4 7 4 LC FT's NI E RiF'l 7 4A7 FT, c9fA f.y U BED M f,0, *d'% H A VE BEEA IIA' BEES) Q g<To e m E.b ~
W PEkTctimED A dh 'UE #F#" M*E 'O 'N'I'El'Y M 1) y er g p uee y (~g Sua Essf ou y fon)A 67Ed. M '#' WP sk211. ; il- F7 TEc owwe c+ns rF C LuP;6- t9;, oJ-teFl /WE L"G3 54Tr5F4NF e t / denREY4.7 dE l UTu T rF O b d i do*i hC r$.pg eC G MM D / d M */ u.) A'/ , 10 . , & & ll: j 2 YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPh0VEDP DEVIATION CATEGCRY: & TEMPORARY ($1NGLE USE) 2 YES C NO IS EO SEVIEW REQUIRED 7 C LONG TERM TEMPORARY. E.XPIRES 2 YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRE 07 C PERMANENT.DCCF ATTACUED (. m C 00R 00R ATTACHED
'q APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED' ' I ' ' e ** -
P el />k ?'/7 ' (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATUREI ' (O A TEl DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL I (REQu!REO FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHVICAL SPEC;FICATIONSURVEILLANCL AND ADMINGThTIVE PRCCEDURESI
/ DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL k- W < >i f
' V ' "
t REoviRED If WORK REQU,RES CC CR I. WOLVES TES TWG OR MAINTESA NCE CsfMETYMilA TED EQUIPMENT)
-- APPR e VALS f
rLANI V AN AL. EMtNT STAFF QATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRQ QATE
/ . 's . , m,1. % '
,2 r' .', l l , , , f]} ,/
z -j p - @ , RESPCN,SIBLE FOR PERSON , , V G. CATE PROCECURE AU ORIZER ' . DATE 4,- r *hr $ .I Y t. /ut_jp p L'tJ <? /]-fi PORC MEET ANG NOMBER CATE tx T ENOED ExPIR ATION RESPONSiSLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE PORC MEETING NUM B ER DATE t A T ENOEQ LAPi A ATiON RESPONSi8LE FOR FERSON CATE DATE-
~PORC MEETING NvMBER ~ CATE Ex T ENOt O E APiR A TION RESPONS48LE FOR PERSON CATE DATE.
PORC MEETING NUM8ER DATE l
-- - : u ra mm sToR.rCa. ao C. at.n to Po c 2 Eu iT ic< cCFY o nCcEcu,E if ,o cEv':. tea of,<a cCo n s = .sE 2S wESS4'
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STAT!ON
, Public
) SerVICOe PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
) [
QC INSPECTION REPORT Page of Equ@ ment Number foc l/ T2/3 Asud />( V r z / '/ - / REFERENCE DOCUMENT!, Equipment Name f 3cy f ,. f4 ,,,, v4trvr 0 Er M Manual Equ pment Location N/# SSR No. Inspection Type rT 2 / 6 / F NCR No. Work to be Performed vri!!s et 77 1 / K / !/ CL U Sfn CWP No. Other t'T 2/ 8/.7 CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT I r ri Ar
- CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION # # # # ' ' '#
ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC N N M.6e w .- a M J/ L t w_ DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT CRITERIA A/F l A/L i QC N I N N I N n /,. '
~ 'M / x o , m .
NN_ _ g iN Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: j i i I I I Quality Control Actions Utilized iCheck): Stop Work O NCR O CAR O Tagged Comments //rsi rj s-, 17 2/ VI. 4 (2 t L&' 9M Doct/w f*2 WO'Ifv ' ' *
- Mt'N'*' ## # #^
ll){
/
( l7 C' M ' 1/Jss f7~ 2) bl. T Cf6TFA i l t-
~
l
~
l 1 j lnspection(s) / Test (s) Completed Satisfactory. 7 Jes C No l If NO, explaYrIA~nd referpnce applicab% docpments in corament section. I Intcected Byj M 3', / Date l' /7' / 7 i l ' '
; <_ , . . s . ~ ,. . m
f.'
-. 1,,: r l- CCT 2176-1
. public ' FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 4
, $Fd'rylCO'" PUDLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO j.1 a r
TITLE: TEST CONT.ROL FORM Type: [7 FT /77 CCT /7 T-Test d/o P 74 - 2 % Prepared By: (Preparer)
#~ N /* Reviewed By: ) NV //-I 46 (Supervisor)
(0 ate) (Date) Revtew/ Concurrence: ,kh5tu k d m M k e n -c,e 4QA Services) 0 (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No b& (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) N'b (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 824Afellev /-8 87 (Technical Services) (0 ate) PORCyc 717 MA.R 1 01987 PORC Review Required: /g7Yes O No
~
NFSC Review Required: / 7 Yes /X No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: J[///67 (Station Manager) (0 ate) Permission to Initiate // fy p Test: / //#J < 3-/7-87 t Super sor) (Date) Test Completed:
/ du /s
<5ndQtitor II 8 fk (Ora te)
Inspection Completed: _e N a_ 3-/#47 (QA Servfces) (Date) Supervisor Review: 3 '/ b D
@4partment Supervisor) (Date)
Notification of Test /) ,/a Completion and Results: d V. ##/ 3 '/d'M 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) FomuiC1372 22 3643
s' . CCT-2176-1 Page'2.cf 4
' .vip.- v.y .,,.*
. o 7.1
~
- g. * -
),
1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To inspect CN changes a.ad strify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT. , P = Primary Responsibility S = Supp' ort Electricians __p____________ Operations __________________ J.L. ).) .
~.
Results __S__________________ Other _______________________ . ( i .;u ,' - 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions
- different from that of the CN and therefore no safety <
analysis is required. 23 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date _ _ _b_ L & S m _ _ ___Y.h.l_Q_%________ __!_#'_YEk_Y_ _ - 3.2 References _____________________________________________ , 3.,
~
q-a r ;:.y; 4.0 AUTHORIZATION 3 - 4.1 Department Approval _, _ ___ __
'd 'I 7 '
Dept. S ervi- Dat 42 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number _____ 4.3 Radiation Uork Permit Issued, if required: Number _____
l
CCT-2176 ,1 Page 3 of 4 g ./
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 All DR's to the Cl.:? being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List '* P QC h OR's reviewed: _________________________________ PO NT ..?.N?A _________?_k.~_SISk__.._$__Ytb!_d__h____._____ e INSFECTOR _/_ _IE.Sy Init. ate
,C ;VITNESS O!NT 3- '5 4"%.2 Check all cables for proper terminations per
(
"""ll.f g p 3p uiring diagrams.
lec.
.QC Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall j WITNESS FOINT .7.:MM.... /2").
..... 3 include both internal and extercal panel 7 INSFECTOR uirin9 t
bE ___f'WV{ ec. SR.\s
% :TNESS 5.4 j uring circuit check, all contacts and FCiNT .8..Y.f.3l/CQ conduetor5 must be verified by closing, INSFECTOR blockin9 or centinuity check as the case may g f 3/iElh _El2c.) N r f) 9'l S.5 All parallel paths must be opened and each I resultant series path checked individually. i I RD__J)/e/77 El e c .
5.6 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria, the app.opriate organization will be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. A9 lec. , 57 Uhere complicated or extensive viring changes have . 'en made, schematics or drawings should be mE. d over by a Hi-liter as each segment is checkes. However, this will be at the discression of the CCT performer. (, s e C . 3
i . CCT.-2176- 1 Page 4 of 4 1 I 5.8 Make a copy of the Test Equipment section (3.1). include the CCT#. and send it to the . Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is ucsd. N/A ,this step.
.3/8f6 h
6 t e l i s i I l L 1 1 I
- i i
i 4 - - ,., - , . - - - ., _ .-_-,_ __ .---__.._---- _ _,- -___,- _._.- -.._ _ __ ~. . - - _ _ . . . - . . _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ - , - .
A Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SCIVlCC= PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC SAFETY EVALUATION N o. C.f T_ E 'L caTroony
~
PAGF /*[/
- z. . . ..- ~ -
TYet O CNOVERALL 0 CN SUBMITTAL 0 SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT 8 TESTREQUEST O TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C 7ROCEDURECHANGE(FSAR) C OTHER CLASalMCATION: ARE THE SY& TEM (5) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED,OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFTECT: CLAS S I 3 YES O NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD 5 YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN 8 YES O NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 2 YES C NO S AFETY RELATED 3 YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM O YES X NO REMARK 3 _S NS
~
EVALUATEON Use Additional Sheets Ef fE . .
- 1. DCES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? 8 YES O NO ,
UST YHE Ar*LICABLE SECTIONS REV!EWED: NM
/. 2. z. . / 4 /. V. S . b / a . Ar. 2.. Z . Sf '/. 3. d.7'"/0
- 6. 3 AT 7.4/.f//8 7 Am//od2b*/./. / b.: d_.h
- 1. av. 3.
7, 6 . 7. 2.'2 . Y.2.'"R. E II 4. 2. '9. '/ 'O / / ' 9. /Z'.
- 14. b. 4. Z . / '/. s . ). I4. 8. N /d JY JI. A 5 A _4 k / 6Si. '7 + .J2
' & // e3."
.c . tu."
3 . N IA 2. 2'
-a s . 16,. ' A,a, D,.' 71. e G w e '< nP um_ JA_/ .* M_ ' M y J, _ 'O ' K U11.
f 11'
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CHANGE (S) BE MADE TO THE FSA'A O YESCR TECH 3 NO SPECI LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
t 3 DETERMINE WHETHEr4 OR NOT THE ACTIVITY IN',OLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION UTluZ:NG THk FOLLOWi'!G GUIDEUNES: (A) H AS THE PROBABluTY OF OCCURRENCE CR THE CONSEOUENCFS OF AN ACC: DENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AR BEENINCREASED? C YES 7G+ eM ,/2 NO cl nSTATE l mBASI
,S-t.
~
-m ,L. en.,,% m A % -n , ad no e b M 6'$- eb PtG :g9.-i=1s.rt 1 ~IXi ,L[.,L f// g, ln .~ C 9, f, my AAA. t> tus % rYnt tir~nsn g o p- in $$~, f u, ,&y, w
/ /
o - / - IBl HAS THE POSSIBluTV OF AN ACC: DENT CR MA!. FUNCTION nF A D 8ERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PRE 9pVSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? O YEb M NO BASIS:
.Sn sA. u , ,- n dalluSTATE e. m~1o; a rn - m 4LJ L
+%<- m s.,o s.q, nqn /
IC) H AS THE MARUIN OF SAFETY. AS LEFiNEDIN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECdNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REDU C YES N NO STATE 3 ASIS: 5"2 G= 5A. S /- m.59 4* 7obLs NA% Alth i n, jL4 ~7* n1 1 *1M /- n1 A #1% 221 b T8f[. G.$"JoJ/'-h > a 1 '1"N f. R kaj /_t So f 4 AJ V l ~7")f t N MM AA % d l ag *v'd h w . *T*).of l*@ti n PW-L ST* t* tiff-19 b l N v 7"Mi i "T"tC 5'T" . __ DOES TH.! ACTIVITY APPEAR TO. INVOI . .N UNRE /IEWED S AFETY CUESY10N C YES y NO B) Z , PPROVED - M aat at, ;arsi sw anati
- a't>
j Form C; M C2 D82
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Pubile OSOrVICet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 0.CY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN I& NO. c ez7-2 -/_% - / PAGE . _. / o 8 /
~
CATEGORY J .
. e- -
TYPE: O CN Overall C CN Submittal f_f.T ~ El 7 d - l Are a'l measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confiried to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation plant construction or previous plant operation? ,7f Yes O No State basis l h & ** C T}.1/ I N 1$ Cbn $1Df=b % YNf~ .A C CQ 5 5 2%A'V M&A; ~7'N#= "F"tlkr32Ak 5U/th)A> Q JJh ~7*H A E 4.c e_ -ru 9 20 J LD.1D Q - - Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes 5 No Applicable Regulations NO TE. If either ansser :s Yes. the actory does not o .vcise an unrev esea enwront"entalquestion. S>gn and dare the form. If both anssers are No, the actwry has the potent al for creat r'g an unrewesed enwrontrentalcuest:on. Cor pieta rne retrauncer of this evs'va::on form. I:UAMIT3 a [e]MLIE i.r .P.tR.m !E*-
- if res3tsirest) .
1. Is the activityidentified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (Sec Q 3)? IdenCfy documents and document sections reviewed - l (
- 2. Determine whether or not the act:vity involv*.'is an unreviewed environmental question using the fcilowing guidelines.
(if the answer to any of the fo: lowing questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity rcsult in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes No State basis (B) Will this activity r3sult in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power lesel? ~ Yes 7 No State basis tC) Does this activity involve an evironmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluattiin the FES) Z Y.'s : No State basis __ 1 1 Does the activity involve an unret 'ewed enuronmental question? Z Yes : No By _C- A5 ces.e. W M _ I-bD
- g. .. . ;.., . , _ . . . .
m
e FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC
) SerVICO' PUBLIC SERVICE C2MPANY CF C2LCRAD') g 5.a t QC INSPECTION REPORT Page
/of_.)[-.'
_E3 vin >ent Number t/A;;'lef r, _t g 2r em e v -< -:ver,a REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eauipment Name ip;,pjew f; r A ;2 4 ,5 O Et M Manual .d//> -- Equipmef.t Locat cr' ~CcsvrRe L Xtv3tyr SSR No. J JJ2 _s* Inspect:on Type f//4cM C NCR No. _n///> _Work to be Performed r_r 7
- ___ CWP No. _g26 .oS 9/'.
Other f.// A/O . 0 / '7/ CALIB%ATED EQUIPMENT (_.c T ,' ~2 f / g _ / CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE QC hm*p%1 lv or) ) /2]D/o 7 /2 - Ed '? 6// StM/'.!ON Y L/QM1 A! * .716 '2 11. - E 7 A u)C. i I DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT } CRITERIA l A/F A/L I OC _ - l Y l 7 I i ' i AX I l 74 i i 7I i i 7 ~ i i i 7 i i I i Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: I i l I I i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Checkh O Stop Work _, Q' NCR O CAR O Tagged Comments , s e ., , r , r .% (',,g yu r t j ir v qiW& z m ;;-- w 42?) 4 ,n w ei_r y g tfr 2/ s c h r*u rip 2r>i ry l0f (~ %?/ A't" 1 A_A f~e~t) PA*2 x 7-2 c9 7 m f Ctn_JW o f -n.b.f& A'. J~.A'_ L . M Af h _ 'd O .1'E. 5 i 7~~ L/, (f. J A. V s h- 8 5 ~r b b k e , h ' N J d u S M S s 7} c Y ~ krx'?#22 /S_ R r'. 'b
% E]2.IFrdb_CAiIAEtoi v of
! CAALG- . I h A//AE 'fNITA u.e h ped CdcW - O 2.9G A r t /3 TGu i3 EL Csd E r TH CR a v MErG2 M . TIC L On d v 7*AACsNC Ou7'
- STEP 2 i JEc 7sc.U GCC ~ Witter A TuitcJG+-t T X AN G Y TAACGb Car
- tali A & ,7 T D-1 %:n LA) IkJNG OA* /QLt. 5 ArilAAC70W 5 TEP 2h S G Cric/Al'1000 - L.UtAE! A TH.tCwfGH^ 'I X A/Jh y 744CG6 cut sculGC 'T k.1caGh '
kJ (!vM: CJ r A LL Sara FAC Tc O
,5 rFP 'Z 7 S ec ncN 4Co- !antel A - E fi in tev C H 1' TaActa cur ALL SA ri,i Mc rc. < v
.5 TE' 3G' SEcrtN 1000 - u21,12C A t!'C An& W%;cf8'2' ar_ ALL SArafscic ev _
. 5 rn? 4(i ,5 ec ricN 'I t.00. u)i:2Es A' d' C' ANh i\ bNa w r' ALL SA riJ FAc rc/? Y S rs .) W' S GC TICN 12.C0 - L4)NICJ A fH.Er._t C'1 t, K, A vd V 'rtlACC6 Ca , a't,t r ES
- Tr .?O) .< s l al 'l,4% Osr AtL int >wfCToAY 5 oT? 45 S EC TicN "w CO - C AJL 2 2 ?] S E' A U A;G OMr SA 7/S FA CTc'A V l srEP yC Scenes wcc. c AdLE z rJGo RucG cur sAriancicxv j .S TEP 41l St.CItcN GOC- c.AJLE 751 % l2 u,<>G oa r[ .s a rescA c 'OA' y _
S r& P '* 1 5 dc ricN [CO CABLE 2 yby . RUNG Our SNrr s FAr %M \
.:.7EP H 4 SEC TvN r cCC Cppt6 nSI Aanc> cur :nrumc ?ce
! t o'EP 50' SEc ??c .t 1000 CA3L{ kWf /2JNb OU Q T/fp( ?C A pf l 5 ?GO 59 ' .' (,Cric N ? 2 00 CA 8L E E. Y _l'4 l !LU)G OJf 3ArtJFACIc W _ l CC.'.;r a AMEb inspection (s) / Test (s) Completed Satisfactory. ~d e s Z No l if NO, explain and referenceapplicable documesafin commeqt4ectioni Inspected By . --
#~U-Date ?'/ 8'7 l
^ 'd J '* " 3 M
! 508 U Bi P2 22 *2W I
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page b of b O Public Service'= PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF COLORADO QC CONTINUATION INSPECTION REPORT EQUIPMENT NAMEINO. (, L.x)13 E'& - O 2.'f C C.A) 2 I 76 COA)TIA)uGa
,5TEP S2 ~SEc7noA) i 200 - CABLE 2 6 J '-l ~7 /2U.LG Gur SATIJFAC70A y ,_sc S TEA 2'l SEcric'N 4'Co !0r.CA)G FAcAA 78 YC4 S to ( /2 /4 2 IRWsu.or; ouT SAT STEP 16 ,secTion 4co- wi,2:xc recsa 74 sto4 34 ro cp is.l.Ig Aa. zig our sAr
.$r2P 11'_ w crca) 600 sA)i.to tlC Mon) Td GOI-10 TO 61-l4 2-1A Avr:G Our SAT _
ST&P 34" SdCTICAI 600 uh. ting MO.*1 Td 604 -12 TO CA 154 IA /!a.v6 cur sdT Sref 3"i Mcric.V 1000 _g'id><UG Hv64 Til Iml. iG 70 CA./4t 18 AaAx; dat JA T' drEP 3{ SECTICA) /DCC LJr.toAC PdcM *rd iOCI 13 its CA-153-Id AMUS Oar,rA r MGr* 4 l' 36CIl0/1/ )LCC
- n' sal AIG lhte +1 IIII*OI-10 To CR -l41 1A AuAIG OyT 3 AT.
.5 TEt' 4 2.' S&cTcAl Isoo wi.2 >AM !=.4c.<1 Td nol /L To C.2 IS3 IA Ra.UG car MT
.S iff Hi SGcroc,^) ~}OO wv'Gs A, A, sNa r rxacta ca r .4a. saris orcer ey '
Srep 44' se c rics) 9Co-wi.22sa g xu e rit 4cE.h eu r A L L TA riMAC TDA Y M 3.//!? (C T Z176- / SieP,5 5. l S. '2. A Alo S 3 ARE SA r>J pac.'roRY. STEP S. H is & S A 7/J F/7C 7 C 4 )/
\
N N N N
'N N
N
'\
N. N N s
\
\
1 I i s t 9 9 A $ , Inspected By T 'V - Date b'I-8 --
/
roauis,m u.5m
,- s-* +sowa j ' '[, . . , Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION , SOTVICO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLGRADD TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: O FT /_f7CCT O T-Test Prepared By: y /r7 Reviewed By: M t' 7 (Preparer) (0 ate) (Supervisor) (Oate)
Safety / Environmental $ Yes i
/N'br
- I'D 'h / ~
Evaluation Required: /7 No
~
umf A - pre Ye[re,,, 4 -4h-87 (Nuclear LZ - Op'erations) (0 ate) Review / Concurrence: 2 78 M 4'-t/- #2 ( rvices) (0 ate) Safety / Environmental / / Evaluation Concurrence: . N Y/f7 (Mchnical Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: Yes O No PORCBORC 719 APR.4- 1987 NFSC Review Required: O e\s /YNo NFSC #: Authorized for Use: _' CMC
.anager)
N f6) tat (Date) e ssion to Initiate . gs Test Completed: h 7 Te t rouctor) (0 ate) Inspection Completed: ~b~ Supervisor Review: ' M9 (Department Superv1/sor) (0 ate) o to n R ts: - 7 NW 9'~5 M[ (ShiftSupervisor) (0 ate) 10CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date)
~
E=7oSn . =. zo
~ ~~ ~ ~
pdhl])g'
~
., FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
.. SCTVICC" PUZLIC SETNICE COMPANY CF CZLCRADO
/
e 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST
), 1.1 To inspect CN changes documented in OR' s uhich
( uere intiated after the original CCT and FT uere -
\
completed and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT. 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricions __p____________ Operations __________________ Results S__________________ Other _______________________ 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required. - 23 Each circulator should be brought to self-turbining before' testing its associated viring. 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3.; Test Equipment l l Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date _$__l.*_f_ son ______ _M____k__O_h________ _ _l_d_ _ _ _ _ _ _- k_ _ _ l 3.2 References ________...__________________________________ l l 4 0 AUTHORIZATIONS l 4.1 Department Approval ho/A (_#h _ _k( _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _dd f(_ jf .lk] f Dept. Supervisor Date 4.2 Mecn/ Ele: Clearance Issued. if required: Number _/_!_ 4.3 Radiation Ucrk Permit Issued. if required: Number l.U 4__ l FORM IC1372 22 3643 l 1
~
. Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
. S SC IVIC:;7' PUZUC CERVICE CIMPANY CF CCLCRADO f
4 5.0 PROCEDURE 51 All Cd's to the CUP being tested have been. reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP g OR's reviewed: _________________________________ to. ss . _ b?:_E l$$_ _H_ _& _ J.6_ _2_ ?h_-[. . _ he.?:_ fgt _Mce_ g:,yn U TU W y [ _. d_f_e,v_ _ c , = p _( d_le.n__P__T_M_76__f____IF_T_aas_1)______
/_ _!9.
__Init. Date 5.2 Check all cables for proper terminations per g utring diagrams. WIM % PO:NI - //- j.f} E1ec.
!5. E hpot check terminals for tiyhtness. This shall include both internal and external panel wiring.
3 _,l___ _ _ Elec. 5.4 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria. the appropriate organization vill be notified of the discrepency and correction made before continuation of the CCT. -
~ _ _____
lec. 55 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3.1). include the CCT4, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. E/R FCAMIC1372 22 3643
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCh
) Servicew NO. CCT2/ 74-3 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE / e8 /
CATEGORY - TYPE: C CN OVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL U SE~ POINT CHANGE REPORT Z TEST REQUEST C TEMPORE RY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSARI C OTHER CLAESIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED,OR DOES THE ACilVITY AFFECT: CLASSI %YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUAAD E YES C NO S AFE SHUTDOWN $ YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 6 YES C NO S AF ETY R ELATED $ YES C NO SECUPITY SYSTEM C YES E NO REMARKS.
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT. TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCR; BED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? %YES C NO L!ST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWEDf8Mk Sed 4 J. 4,7 7. I , L?. /O 7. 4 . l . 9. w. 7 7, 4 F 2. 2 I / /> 2 2 9. k/dbb 2.7 7 /, f@, r E l. 4.+ S.
2?9. 29 4.2.2{2
)I, 9 '
IO.2. T i /M'l 1% W 2.2. b+. 4, 4.T I 4',M l ,~' I4. % Iti, / O. I L t. f} , flo'm. E,f k , A J C e ,% r'K 1_s O'O, 2 I, 2-]f. :2 f , Ao'o A L r o n.% M , d.K 1 _YR _r.~ % 'I'
~
/
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CHANGE (S) BE MADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? O YES E NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE YACE-3 DETERM:NE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED.S AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY QUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GUICELINES:
(A) HAS THE PROBABillTY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQU;PVENT IMPORTANT TO S AFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BEEN INCRE ASED) C YES K STATE B ASIS i Th l r Cr T ds es cnN cagle c>r~ prwd anv w k fNe~w r - 1.w ~/
,,c
~
r e& er, v onen i 4,LWs & G,khm. i (B) H AS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR VAL UNCTION CF A DiFFERENT TYPE TH AN ANY EVALUATED P AF'QOUSLY l IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED) C YFS A. NO STATE B ASIS IS /8 C d I P fC bh? _f O f2 y eHm c % e. ee A' QrnAwa .) / ognm d. S=- M, (C) HAS THE MARGtN OF SAFETY, A' DEFINED IN THE BAS'S FOR ANY TE HNIC AL SPECtFICATION OR IN TM FSAB BEEN REDUCED 7 3 NO STATE B ASIS. - h/b f/F An /ha/' r/* e E 5'er$ %/ /S _' w%YESd _ DOES T ACTIVITY APPEAR TO. INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED S A FETY CUESTION C YES 3 NO
/ yh BE SAF[ TY SIGNIFICANT C YES % NO BY < MMb ,sa N~~ ~'[7 APP ROV ED[t[6 f. r.*m fie d - V N -bI7 v - on __t N) % _ , cart, p j g s,4 r y s . ,/ c4*i I s hu n ,e - N.
b Iw ur+ C. 372 02 3382
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public Servicet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPAhlY OF COLORADO CN 'OTHE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. C cPh71-1 PAGE /d/ CATEGORY , TYPE: G CN Overall Z CN Submittal Othe CCT- A17 d -8 _ Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity ccnfined to the on-site areas previously disturbed durina site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? K Yes C No State basis T4 :s achur / u- lr cu Nn e d fs l h r..s , d w ocYsr C L.--.- LLhYlA} S ! ls the actP/ity required to achieve compliance with Federal. State or !ocal environmental regulations? G Yes [No Applicable Regulations _ NO TE. If either ansser os Yes. the actiwty does not uns ch e an unreve Aed environtrentalquestion. S gn .oo d date the form. If both ansaers s'e No. the activty has the potentrar for creatng an unrewened enwronmentalquest on. Comp.ete the rema,ncer of th s es at at-cn form EVALUATION (Useadditionalsheets WrequiresD ' 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Z Yes Z No Or St.pplementary Environmental Documents (See Q-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
l (If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes. then this a:,tivity involves an unreviewec environmental l question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previous'y evaluated in the FES7 Yes Z No State basis
~
(B) Will this actisity result in a significant char ge in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power lesel? Z Yes Z No State basis (C) Does this actmty involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES) I Z Yes : No Statt basis _ Does the activity invcis e an unres iewea env:ronmental question? Z Yes Z No , b By
/hp>& %,249 g
N ~U$l Approred hh 0 ram IMg
- ci j ,s y v u v' "' :nU"Y
$ aavi /
_w m 7, % e-nc U m f JHV . J . 24 43 Q / <w J i
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public SerVICO e PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION FIEPORT Page / of / AE Equipment Number '/3 3 </ // d 4 c/fNd /ht </23 7// C/t '/3 ud REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecuipment Name SZ f bh 'e # 0 & M Manual . /t/# Equipment location /5/4 r's Mv/ reb Mad'. SSR No. M4 Insoection Tvoe S/4 NCR No.
- Work to be Performwf dry 9/ 74- 3 CWP '. 2$'M Other E I N 'S Y& I CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT d,( 7 (, - d *74 7~.
CALIBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB RATION ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE [ Si sy p,t e J
/
. N) b /0 W l3 /7~1
'j W
l l t
%. DIMENSIONAL INSPECT!ON PLACE OF-MEASUREMENT ~ CR.TERIA l A/F l A/L _j QC N m ___
is i i
~
% /Ll A N ij I i ~
Pl >' ~ 4 - T ) i l i I N i N i i i X i i i i N Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicab e DC Numbers Below: i l i i i i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): O Stop Work O NCR O CAR C Tagged Comments 1
\l M i <
r:Je C Pr sc.12 ) r a l i n bdPP1 i / 5.l $*1 0f C- G T VC- s - fno -lst n l 4 "
) 1 (3 C. f ) % ? nf .U/Y l-<
/
f 1 t ,- t 6nspectiontsK Test _Ls.M"ompleted Satisf actory. Y Yes'~ O No M NO. explain and referenc4 applicable chcuments in comment svetiors , inspected 9 ! - Date re ... , v::: w j . ~ :w,-- ; s ~ : .c - ,- .. s.. I
Page ~'of 21 1 j
., Public roar sr. vnAis suctsAn ceseaArino srArios
.~
$9TVICe* Pusuc SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM
~
Type: 8 FT / 7 CCT /7 T-Test 87 f) 0. bW Y?ft, CWP S yd g3 M,_A e a , Prepared By: ff%! t- d//Fd7 Reviewed By/- h J, :7 [9 [f7 (Preparer) (Oate) (Supervi sor) ' (Date) I Safety / Environmental 8 Yes M% y //7[d / l Evaluation Required: /7 No ~ ~ (' ,_;ELah ^ f. [Z 7!87 l Nucle r Lid ns) Da te)'
\ \ , J -(n - 2 7 , l Review / Concurrence: x Mmr 9 nm n+ "Mrr 2 u.n
- l ((QAServices)Q (Date) l Safety / Environmental
; Evaluation Concurren:e: Ga. W()e.eG7 3-/7 97 (Technical S W 1ces) (Date)
PORC Review Required: [es O No' PORC EORC 717 MAR 171c 37 NFSC Review Required: O Ye> o NFSC #: , Authorized for Use: bl!# /N OMI (Stattdn Mavager) b/7[f7 (Date) 0fkhkh ft Supe vis r)
, . 2 c, r 9 (Dat )
Test Completed: / K/( ' L w 3/Jo/97
'[Tes Co 6 ' (Date)
Inspection Completed: (s ' QA Services) A / [7
/(Da(e)
Supervisor Review: .//f % /, / /. 2~ a/[7 KTepartment Su'pervisor) (Date) Notification of Te n Completion and Results: - j - M-N t Wrvi sor) (Date) 10CFR 50.59 Review:
- (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) l i
W C3 M 22 3tc
.~
- 1.0 PURPOSE GF TEST 1.1 To verify correct operation of newly installad XCR's
.equired fcr the operation of the Steam Line Rupture i Detection and Isolation System (SLRDIS).
2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Frimary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results _____P_______________ 1 Other _______________________ O.2 Notify Technical Services of any test /e::periment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/CWF. M 7 4 2.3 Coordinate with operations as required. C OFC vergy/rene[
~
- .0 PREREQUISITES 0,1 Test Equipment Last Calibration
,1 Name Identificatton Na. Date 4
- _ _.%_ _ _ _r _._ ._., s _r_u_ _ _ _ _L_\___A_?__)2___l_'JC
__ _____ _ _ _S_ _ _: ?_ _ _9_6_ _ _ _ _ _ _J_.,u_ _m_ _ _r_w __ ____ _ _ _s_m_ _ _ _ _ _H__s_ __ __ _ _ _ _ _t_ _o_ _2_ _2_ _s_ _c_ _ _ _ Sra _ _ _ _ _ _ _m_ _ _r_e_x_ _ __ _E_ _n_'s _ _ _/_ _9_'/ _J __ __ ____ _ _J_ ___o___28_ . E._a_ _ _
- f. w ex
___r__s__ ___.____ _ _f_ M_ _ _ _ _ _ _/2_ _7_ _J .. _/o- _ _____ _ _ _ _ _.2_E_ _f_ . . _ _l _ _ { 0.2 Reterences _____________________________________________ w Plin' /f </ 73 5 /- -87 ~) f K - o priy m v/2 s- as-n i i
-.-----.,-,,,-.-_--.,-,----,,___-,,,n,-., ...n,-,-_-.,--,-_--~_
# 4 l'
. i 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS ,
4.1 Department Approval f b_/ _d2_k, h_d[_dffi{_f'25'N ept. SGpervisor Date . 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Istued, if required: Number ad$f1 4.3 'Radi ation Work Permit Issued, i f regt tred: Number jij(( / 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The folowing steps may be performed in any order as long as they are f unctionally sequential and do not bypass a DC hold point. t i 5.1.0 All DR's to the CWP being tested have been
,, '"%3 reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CWP
- 7,.,y . q _
DR's reviewed: _ _ _ jkl % ,A _ d_%g _ _6_ _., _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,
. ....- a ,q.
5
' ANI </ d ________________________________________________
_ _@_ _ _ / 2_t.P Init. Date NOTE: The following steps pulse test the Loop 1 Logic A XCR module located at I-9010 rack 1202 point P9. 5.1.1 Depress and hold pushbutton HS-90379A located at I-9310 rack 1102 point P9. i N ____f_____ l . C ,' ,'. '5.1.' Verify by visual observation that yellow lamps l j' j# in positions 1. O and ; corresponding to XCR- 3 -2 7_ t7 9305A, XCR-9307A ar'd XCR-9309A are all lit indicating successful pulse test of those XCRs.
- 5.1.0 Rel ease pushbut ton HS-?'.*,079A. ~ ~ ~ ~I- OIfI ~
l 4%
- / "1 . 4 Verify by visual obse vation that yellow lamps 513I0~~
7.7 7 in positions 1, 2 and ; all go out.
@R.
l NOTE: The following section f unctionally tests the ~~~~555Til~ Loop 1 A Logic SLRDIS actuation of XCR-97!.5A, XCR-9307A and XCR o;09A as well as SLRDIS actuation of valves HV-2250. N' '- 2 2' 2, HV-2241. PV-2229. PV-2240. HV-2001. HV-2200. FV-2005, PCV-5210, PCV-5214-1 and PCV-5214-2. IDR E7151l
8 I NOTE: In order to perform this test Loop 1 must be shut down and valves HV-2253, M3, HV-2241. FV-2229. FV-2243, HV-2201. HV-2003, FV-2205, F C'. 5217, " C'/ - 5 2 ; ' ' m--- C. 52'.'-2 must all be fully open. * ?-'da PDEguSLt
$~i.4.( SC EL PO A. 9 7 - 1 i S"D 749g 5.1.5 Verify with operations that Loop 1 is fully shut down and that valves HV-2253, M'/ 2272, HV-2241, PV-2229 PV-2243. HV-2201. HV-2203, FV-2205,
' r, 5 :;, 7/ gr i
- a w ' FQ' ;; ; 4 are al 1 ~
open. ses. 0 t0A 9 ~l ~ t 4.ru SAS_ 5.1.6 Verify by local observation that valves HV-2253, 9p 9if/ 225, HV-2241, PV-2229, PV-2243, HV-2201 HV-c2" 5217, FL.-3214-; U ,6 2203, FV-2005, cow FC.~ 52:4 ; are all fully open. 582 90 A 2 7 - 14 3ID
- hb -----
5.1.7 Position local observers with calibrated stopwatches at valves HV-2250, HV-2201 and e5v- sgo pag 02'~< and verify that local valve observers can 9 7-146V hear audible commands over the Gastronics public , address system. 5.1.8 Position a Results Technician with a jumper cable at TB 1204 of I-10 and verify that technician can hear audible commands over the Gastronics public address system. cy
/
5.1.9 Have Results Technician connect one end of jumper to TB 1204-5! being cautious not to touch other end of jumper to anything else. q3
- U- ------
5.1.19 Alert observers at valves to be ready to start timing with stopwatches upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command over the Gastronics. Timing is to be terminated by each valve observer upon first visible observation of beginning of valva closure. 5.1.11 Alert Results Technician to be ready to short 1 unattached end of jumper to ground upon hearing ! of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command. ,
- - 21A _- - _---
5.1.12 Announce command for SLRDIS XCR actuation over Galtecnics public address system. As a result the waiting Results Technician w14 i short remaining end of jumper cable to grourd, thereby actuating SLRDIS XCR-9335A. XCR-9337A and X2R-9339A. -
. 4J
,, 5.1. t! Verify by visual ocservati on that red lamps V, in positions 1. O and 3 of XCR module located at
. a. 4 jg yj g,7
_ 19 10 rack 1202 point P9 corresponding to XCR- , 97 5A. XCR-9037A and XCR-9'J39A are all lit Indicating sucesssful actuation of those XCR's.
i --- .- yfify[ 3 5.1.14 Verify with valve observers that valves HV-2253, f:C.Yi' M w n/ " HV-2001 m . - .~ 1. JZ.J all closed completely, u s a n. P O A. 9 9-I4 se> 4D1s(n/vr -- --- -- 5.1.15 Obtain stopwatch measured XCR actuation time intervals from observers at valves. Enter [*gg 3%v:iby-//6/ measured time delay values corresponding to each #
> p g ; gsc3 6/7/ actuated XCR into table on the last page of this t e s, t .
$ #__3'2747 Acceptance Criteria : < 2 sec I
5.1.16 Note any measured time delay values that are greater than the above stated acceptance criteria so that reason for failure to meet acceptance criteria can be investigated. !
~ ~
5.1.17 Verify by local observation that the following g SLRDIS XCR actuated valves also closed fully: [p. H' 22T!. HV-2241, PV-2229, PV-2243, HV-220', FV-2205. ~ ' ' ' ? ! ^ < .nd ~ C' ' 5 214-G, a a s. AdR. 97-#4fD 5.i.I7.t .n _rda PJg.4.
=
8 2j ump,?.A fSb i w<N ----------- 8b u .1.1h hmove er nstaa4ea oetween TB 1204-53 and , ground. 1
~5V
' ,+*h. -J .. 5.1.19 Verify by visual observation that red lamp in position 2 of XCR module located at 19210 rack Il bN f 71202 point P9 goes out indicating successful '
f.j.19.1 reset of XCR-9337A. 566 MA 5' 7-'. /T2 7
- gg 3 . ; .11.s 's o. ,
e y;.14.] 7, g.,.o4.4
-.1.20 Verify by local observation that valves HV-2001, HV-2007. and FV-2005 all reopened completely.
l l
~7 9 4 .7- 2 7 6 7
~~~~~
5.1.21 Reset (CR-9325A by momentarily depressing switch ! HS-9 375A located at I-06.
.s... 5.1.22 Verif i by visual observation that red 1 amp in
-- S----
, positicn 1 of XCR module located at 19:10 ract
* - " ' ' *'.;,* I h.k -
/pp202 point F9 goes cut i n d i c.a t i n g successful reset of XCR-90 5A.
~~~~~~~~~~~
5.1.O! Verify by 1 oc al ob serv at 1 cn that va1.es HV-2253. 9 91. m N, HV-2241. FY ~'229 and PV-224T all 11'" reccened completel/.
$ .t. *13.l %g (pt g7. rib . _'dM_ [-_I'#- - nfr7 5.1.24 Reset X2R-9?;9A by momentarily depressing switch HS-93777A 1ocated at I-06.
Verify by visual observation that red lamp in Y ---
. . L_. ,, , 5 . 1. 2 5 pcsiticn 3 of ACR mcdule located at 19310 rack ,
R?.' b M. M/>1002
' ' ~
ceint P9 gces out indicating successful Mg reset ci XCR-93!9A.
FT-2176-1 Page 6 of 21 s e s. f 0 #. 7 7 l'f St -----------
!.21 Verify by local cbservation that valves PCV-5213, PCV-5214-1 and FCV-5214-2 all reopened completely.
.5. l Q1 s e s. Ph L 2 9 - 14 SD ES --- -----
c NOTE: The following steps pulse test the Loep 1 Logic B XCR module located at rack 1000 coint P9. S.I.24.1 5' a s P4 A. F7 - 14 3-o _ Be s _ .#.ver/.ru 5.2.1 DepressandholdpushbuttonHS[33798locatedat rack 1102 point F1.
", 3D
" ' Verify by visual cbsarvation that yel1ow Iamps
. .E. . . : : .., )- 482 7
',f. ppg 7 2 in positions 1, 2 and 3 correspending to XCR- ""'7 .
93358, XCR-9337B and XCR-9339B are a11 1it indicating successful pulse test of those XCRs. MS 5.2.3 Relcase pushbutton HS-933798. .m tv pg
," i Ti n -- .m " 2. 4 Iamps Verify by visual cbservation that yelIcw
'I MI WM 7-23 f 7 i n posi ti ons 1, 2 and 3 all go out.
-- ?4E---
NOTE: The following se: tion functionally tests the Loop 1 B Logic SLRDIS actuation of XCR-93~58. XCR-9~.~.78 and XCR-9339B as well as SLRDIS actuation of va l ves HV-C53. H"-225' HV-2241. N/E PV-2229 PV ~'243, HV-2001, H-2203 , FY-2205. I PCV-5212. PCV-5214-1 and PCV-5214-2. NOTE: In crder to pericrm this test Loop 1 must be shut dcwn and v al ves HV-2253, ' ' ' ~* o ~ HV-2241, (p,t PV-2229. PV-2243. HV-2~01, HV-2203. FV-2205. g.g y FCV-5213. PCV-5214-1 and PCV-5214-2 must all be ful1y open.
- 2.5 Verifv with operaticns that Loop 1 is fully shut down and that vil<ss HV-2252, H' 2 2 ' !-. HV-2241. FM PV- 2 2 ~'C , FV-2243, HV-2001. HV-2203. FV-22C 5. (?-'Sil
~ T. 22:~, 7 :'. 5::' :: ~2'. 5211 2 are all open. S at e- P D 9- 8'l-I4 TO 5.2.6 Verify by l oc al observaticn that valves MV-2252.
3)$- . -- 94 y 69 N. HV-2241. FV 2203. FV-2205. M.
-'220, FV-2247. HV-2201. HV-5::!. 1. ~_: ~ ~ *"-
E . . ; .i a r e a l 1 ful1y cpen. f. E 6 P D O #45b W---------
/ 3 - 2 7 _c.l ?
5.2.7 Positicn 1ccal ceservers with calltrated stcpwat:hes at val <es HV-2253. HV ~'201 and W , W and ver1 4y that local valve ob'3ervers can hear aucible commands over the Galtrpnics public address system. SC E. 88 d 97"/7O
- - , _ _ . . , . , . - ,,_-,.-_m..
5.2.8 Positien a Results Technician with a jumper cable at TB 1002 of I-10 and verify that technic 1tn can hear audible commands over the Gai tronics public address system. 5.2.7 Have Results Technician connect one end of jumper to TB 1002-45 being cautious not to touch other e"d of jumper to anything else. 5.2.10 Alert observers at valves to be ready to start timing with stopwatches upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR ac tuati on command over the Gattronics. Timing is to be terminated by each 4 valve cbserver upon first visible observation of beginning of valve closure. , 5.2.11 Alert Results Technician to be ready to short unattached end of jumper to ground upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command. 5.2.12 Announce command for SLRDIS XCR actuation over . h b ._ Galtronics public address system. As a result the waiting Results Technician will short rernalning end of jumper cable to ground, thereby ar.tuating SLRDIS XCR-93059, XCR-9337B and XCR-90098.
.,., 5.2.10 Verify by visual observ ati on that red lamps 7 ,N _ in pocitions 1, 2 and ! of XCR module located at p.8 4 -*N 8 gf 3/pyf'y19 10 ract 1002 point F9 corresponding to XCR-93!58, XCR-93378 and XCR-9309B are all lit 7; ,
indicating successful actuation of those XCR's. ,,
\. w'.p~.') L', ~ '
Veriiy w;th valve observers that valves HV-2250,
'847 M 8e.14
. 4 .& -f HV-2201 - .c. :2:! all closed completely.
/Evc J.t 2 rf. S ar s. P Q R. S ~1 - 14.s o '750 .7-27-17
~~~~~~~~~~~
lf: 5.2.15 Obtain stepwatch measured XCR actuation time inters al s' from cbservers at val.es. Enter ,. :~* , ' ,"~~ ' , ' h 3 4. y. measured time del ay values cceresponding to each C.M., Ja7'ff* actu ated XCR ir.to table on the last page of this test.
- m .1_.u _J_7_
l Acceptance Criterie : , 2 sec C.C.*.: Note eng ine a sur ed time dela.' values that are I greatte than the abo <e stated acceptance criteria so that r e s. s on f or- failure to meet acceptar.ca criteria can te i n v e s t 19 5,t e d . S. 2 . Ho . I SE& PD A 91 - I $.S*O 8EG - 'Y)0 ~2I" U l 5.2.17 Vertf. bv local observation that the following
- l SLEDIS XCF actuated val ves slso cicsad fully:
l D4g\ F. 2:27. HV-2241. FY-2229 PV-224!. HV-2000. FV- i i 3 ,,
- c. .. _-. . . . . . , . . . . -.
CE 6- PDL B 7 - t** S ' o T'____I~_# 7 _ l
.* *l hD hilN*dN _ k
FT-2176-1 Pego e of 21 5.2.18 Remove jumper installed between TB 100~'-43 and ground.
~j,o$ iM ____
m _ A T_ _ I V 5.2bt9 Verify by visual observation that red lamp in ' 'P*;G55{//,/
;;;-;7 J4 /f/posi tion 2 of XCR module located at 19310 rack 1002 point P9 goes out indicating successful reset of XCR-9335B.
SS f, z.11. I, 2, 3, + sdx A0A B 7- /O 7 5.2.20 _ _ h j_ __ Verify by local observation that valves HV-2201, HV-2293 and FV-2205 all reopened completely. 5.2.21 _ BEE ___ Reset XCR-93358 by momentarily depressing switch HS-93375B located at I-06. QC Verify by visual observation that red t ; ;-;g; 5.2.22 lamp in
* ' '; ,,*,f" g/
yh/ f y position 1 of XCR module located 1002 point P9 goes out indicating successful at 19310 rack reset of XCR-93379. 5.2.23 Verify by local observation that valves HV-2253, __ b $ ___ SpA W' NJ, HV-2241, PV-2229 and PV-2243 all g reopened completely.
}s.2.24
.'t. %i $st 900. $7 611 RAS .)_M-g-[ 7 Reset XCR-93098 by momentarily depressing switch HS-93077B located at I-06.
e~ ___3__4 S_ _ __ ,..'s",.. 5.2.25 Verify position by visual observation that red lamp in 3 of XCR modulo located at 19310 rack dK ' '.*'NN T h 71000 point P9 goes out indicating successful reset of XCR-9309B. g.E E EOd S7-Id D S$S
~~~~~-~~~~~
. I . _ . _ .; Verify by local observation that valves PCV-5213. PCV-5214-1 and PCV-5214-2 all reopened c omp 1 te t e l y .
52,21 Srs. /gp_ 5'7 - l f-fD M -
.tv ___ ______
N2TE: The f ollowing steps pul se .est the Loop 2 Logic A XCR module located at I-9310 rack 602 point P9. 5.3.1 Depress and hold pushbutton HS-93~80A located at I-9310 rack 502 point P9. - .r.. Y __c_b___.8____ _
. . ~ :. 5. 3. 2 Verify by visual observation that yel l ow lamps
. ' ..'*3' } [/ p j71n positions 1. 2 and 3 ccrresponding to XCR-
- 93!1A. XCR o33:A and XCR 23!EA are all lit indicating successful pulse test of those XCRs.
g,f
, , , 5.3.3 Release pushbutton HS-93750A. .>-
c
. . f , ,L 4
_ _ _D_ _> _ _ _r ___ 5.3.4 Verify by .< 1 s u a l observation that yellow lamps
.i!7 Tb/ 2/ g ) in positions 1. O and ~ all go cut.
m
NOTE: The following se:tton functionally tests the
-Loop- 2 A Legic SLRDIS actuation of XCR-9336A, I 6('I XCR-9334A and XCR-933SA as well as SLRDIS 4 '\( actuation of valves HV-2254, HV-2292. HV-2242, i
% PV-22;O, PV-2244, HV-2202, HV-2204, FV-2206, PCV-5214-3, PCV-5201 and PCV-5305.
2 GLS 3 - 19? * ] NOTE: In order to perform this test Loop A' must be shut down and valves HV-2254, HV-2292. HV-2242, I PV-2230, FV-2244, HV-2202, HV-2204, FV-2206. PCV-5214-3, PCV-5201 and PCV-5305 must all be [ i fully open. !
- 2. TAf 2 19-T 7 h 5.3.5 Verify with operations that Loop /f is rully* shut down and that valves HV-2254, HV-2292, HV-2242, PV-2230, PV-2244 HV-2202, HV-2204 FV-2006,
~ 2 ','- 3214 -3.
.'CV 520! cnd o C V-- 5 3'.;&- are all open. ##E /PE T 7 ' I 43'#
J, 3, T, l 5:M. ACA. 91~'$ W ' EN ~Y5f_!_$$$_
- 5. 3. 6 Verify by 1ccal observation that valves HV-2254, -
HV-2292, HV-2242 PV-2230, PV-2244, HV-2200, HV-1 2204, FV-220e. #2'. 5.'IM-3, F CV 52:4 e. 4 I C ', - 32.5 are all fully open, s rs. f0A 97-11rb
~7b_4_ _7_ _2_1_ _J_7 5.2.7 Position local observers with calibrated i
stopwatches at valves HV-2254, HV-2200 ano ~2'.- -
-52!'-3 and verify that local valve otservers can heir audible commanos over the Gattronics public i address system.* 566 (([_ p ? , f g 32) ,
_!r!w::3:2____ q - l 5.3.8 Pozition a Rasults Technician with a jumper cable at TB 602 of I-lO and verify that technician can hear audible commands over the Gaitrcnics public address system. t __ _f_$_h_ S _____ 5.3.9 Have Results Technician connect one end of jumper to TE o02-43 being cautious nct to touch other end of Jumper to anythinq else. (' 5.3.10 Alert observers at val ves to be ready to start timing with stopwatches upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command cver the i Gattronics. Tim'.ng is to be terminated by each valve observer upon fi r st visible observation of beginning of valve closure. {j/ ( 5.3.;l ____d '_____ Alert Results Technician to be ready to short unattached end cf jumper to ground upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation commen.. , ee ! _A> 5.3.12 Announce command for SLROIS XCR actu0tten over Gai t r or. i c s puolic acdress systee. As a result the waiting Focults Te:nnician w:1. srcrt ( remain 1r.g enc 04 Jumper catie to arc.nc, thereer l l
actuating SLRDIS XCR-9336A, XCR-9334A and XCR-fp 933SA. s~ **A' - EB- ?---
.N ,..., 5.3.13 Verify by visual obtervation that red 1 amps
' 1, 2 and 3 of XCR module located at
. ',',$.d[./g// " ~~; rt_. Jff,y/f., 19310 i n posirack ti ons602 point P9 corresponding to XCR-9334A, XCR-9336A and XCR-9338A are all lit indicating successful actuation of those XCR's.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
b 10 5.3.14 Veri f y wi th val ve observe.*s, that valves HV-2254, VITNESS 521' 2 all closed completely. OINT Ag$.l.%,q ,,%.HV-2202 2s n Jr nd 7" 0J'./2 6 7- N S o INS % 215 Obtain stopwatch __ $ M ___ measured XCR actuation time
'CC intervals from observers at valves, Enter W.TN SS measured time delay values corresponding to each
- POINT (1, 3,g y/)f actuated XCR into table on the last page of this INSPECT k'SJZyh;O5t *
*?~) 4
--------.f'?.7- 2l .--
Acceptance Cri teri a : < 2 sec L 5.3.16 Note any measured time delay values that are greater than the above stated acceptance criteria so that reacon for failure to meet acceptance criteria can be investigated.
- 5. 3. /C./ Se e 202 fr 7- / y s e Te-S &~ ~2-22. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f 7 5.3.17 Verify by lo:al observation that the f ol l owi ng SLRDIS XCR actuated valves also closed fully: HV-2292. HV-2242. FV-2230, PV-2244, HV-2004 FV-
~
2206, ; - C '. 52:1 r.; ' 2 '. E !-: '.r. 4., ppfg g7, /9 ego f.0 / 3-2)- E 7 p 't #b 7h.;TNESS 5.3.18 Remove jumper instal 1ed between TE' 602-43 anc '
""d*
'C.NT b.k.2[df/// 9"
\Ns'Et cR $0-f 5.3.19 Verify 2iMA- IV by visual observation that red lamp in position 1 of XCR module located at 19 10 raci 602 point P9 goes out indicating successful l
reset of XCR-9334A. l S. 3. /7. /, 2, f Y ft s FM E7- /5 2/ = US -- ?k O ---- 5.3.20 Verify by 1ocal observation that valves HV-2002. HV-2204 and FV-220s all reopened completely. *
- - -.T-2
*/9 - - _3 - ) / - - , .
5.0.21 Reset XCR-9036A by momentarily depressing switch t HS-9337sA located at I-06. pg 5.3.22 Verify by vi sual observation that red lamp in E l. position 2 of ACR module lo:sted at 19310 raci p ' g,gr;.d ' f- 602 point F9 goes cut indicating successful l reset of XCR-93! A.
--N g ----
l 5.!.27 Verify by local cbse vation thet valves HV-2254 HV-2292. HV-2242. FV-2000 and FV-2244 a!; l reopened completely, pg7 i _ _ . . . _._ m .,,. _ _ _ _ - . . - , . ~ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ - --.
r__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ___ 5.3.24 Reset XCR-93!9A by momentarily depressing switch HS-93379A located at I-06. m Verify by visual obsarvation that_ red lamp in [8.5* OlNT b .j.,. l!)/df67/ VITNISS 3.. . 25 position 3 of XCR module located at 19310 rack INSPECTOR 6C2 point P9 goes out indicating successful reset of XCR-933SA. fif M $2-/970 5.3.25 Verify by local observation that valves PCV- _- {__ 5214-3. PCV-5201 and PCV-5305 all reopened ,p f c ompl et el y. -' WW
- - ., > e -r
- f. ) . 2 7 ffr Pat 17 -/vfo UT Of0_3;A) ' L"- C ^'t"'-
NOTE: The following steps pu test the Loop 2 Logic B XCR module located at I-9310 rack 402 point P9. 5.4.1 Depress and hold pushbutton HS-93380B 1ocated at I-9310 rack 500 point P1. 5.4.2 Verify by visual chervation that yel1ow Iamps NS
~~~~~~
)/ TNESS p sitions 1, ICINTinfibeg b/ hf 7 in 93348, 2 and 3 corresponding to XCR-XCR-93365 and XCR-9338B are all lit indicating successful culse test of those XCRs. 5.4.3 Release pushbutton HS-930 SOB.
- M=L--
8MI {,;.UTNIS 5.4.4 Verify by visual observation that yellow lamps FCINT I.3 DIP in p sitions 1, 2 and 3 all go out. gM INS?ECTOR
- NOTE: The following section functionally tests the Loop 2 B Logic SLRDIS actuation of XCR-9336B, XCR-9334B and XCR-93388 as well as SLRDIS actuation of valves HV-2254, HV-2292, HV-2242, PV-2230. PV-2244 HV-2202, HV-2204, FV-2206, PCV-5214-3. PCV-5201 and PCV-5305.
NOTE: In order to perform this test Lcop 1 must be shut down and valves HV-2254 HV-2292, HV-2242. PV-2000 PV-2244, HV-2002. HV-2004 FV-2206. PCV-5214-3, PCV-5201 and PCV-5305 must all be fully open. 5.4.5 Veri fy with operations that Loop 1 is fully shut down and that valves HV-2254 HV-2292. HV-2242, FV-2200 PV-2244, HV-2002, HV-2204, FV-2206, F{.-22.4=+, C/-22.>. c ,d F V - 5 '.45- are all open. sfr PM 9 7 - Wro
$* W* S* / JW /0 4 ff /4/fCR.? Skh
~~~~~~
5.4.6 Verify by local observation that valves HV-2254, HV-2292. HV-2242. PV-2200. PV-2044, HV-2202, HV-2 04 FV-2006. " '/-!:*3-?
. M*'E20;
=d r:V-ST:C are al1 ful1y open. 5// #M f'? /* SC
% ./ 3 1 -/?
W
5.4.7 Position local observers with calibrated stopwatches at valves HV-2254, HV-2202 and fiW"- 5214 3 and verify that local valve observers can hear audible commands over the Gaitronics public address system. 3FE- f D A. 87-fe[s0, 5.4.0 Position a Resul ts T echnician with a jumper __T E ____ cable at TB 404 of I-10 and verify thct technician can hear audible commands over the Gaitronic.s public address system. 5.4.9 Have Results Technician connect one end of _ _B_ _A_ _S_ _ jumper to TB 404-73 being cautious not to touch other'end of jumper to anytning else. __ ?b ____ 5.4.10 Alert observers at valves to be ready to start timing with stopwatches upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command over the Gaitronics. Timing is to be terminated by each valve observer upon first visible observation of beginning of valve closure. _ _ _ _E_ _R_ _ _S 5.4.11 Alert Results Technician to be ready to short unattached end of jumper to ground upon hearing of audible SLRDIS XCR actuation command. g 5.4.12 Announce command for SLRDIS XCR actuation over Gaitronics public address system. As a result the waiting Rasults Technician will short remaining end of jumper cable to ground, thereby actuating SLRDIS XCR-93368, XCR-9304B and XCR-CC 5.4.13 Verify by visual observation that red lamps __2[dk____ d WlTNE-F3fNT . dygg in positions 1, 2 and 3 of XCR module located at n;e-by /[7 I9310 r it% 402 point P9 corresponding to XCR-93348, XCR-9336B and XCR-933SB are all lit indicating successful actuation of those XCR's. s,... __ b____
- 4. pVerify with valve observers that valves HV-2254
- NT M. 4f HV-2202 and fCV-52!^-7 all closed completely.
INvnica 2ts ~) s e c_ pp p. y7.,4 a g , 3.gf,f y
~~~~~~~~~~~
I' 5.4.15 Obtain stopwatch measured XCR actuation time \"'IN33S intervals from observers at valves. Enter RNTOf.lWf.hNmeasured time delay values corresponding to each IN9ET;14'9ctuated XCR into table on the last page of t h i !! test. 59_51_ _ _ _ _1_. 2 Acceptance Criteria : < 2 sec 5.4.16 Note any measured time delay values that are greater than the above stated acceptan:e criteria so that reason for failure to meet acceptance criteria can be investigated. Vo 'l-l6 . I C C t~. & A. ?7 -l!.G' _ RA S O '-- __~-
. 4 5.4.17 Verify by local observation that the following SLRDIS XCR actuated valves also closed fully:
HV-2292, HV-2242, PV-2230, PV-2244 HV-2204, FV-2206, "C'.' 5 0:-1 cmd oC 03 : 5. 5/E N # r - e'/# O
&~~~~~~~~~~~
J 2-2/-j? 5.4.18 Remove jumper instal 1ed between TB 404-73 and ground.
~
- DC 5.4.19 Verify by visual observation that red 1 amp in
_3d_[_IV NITNESS
)CINT . [,,,)/fffyy position 1 of XCR module located at 19310 rack INSPECTOR 402 point P9 goes out indicating successful reset of XCR-9334B. g So % ' f . I,1,, 3, 4 fri t' M 97 - //.2 7 5.4.20 Verify by local observation that val ves HY-2002, _}[$_ _
HV-2204 and FV-2206 all reopened completely.
% s 3.21-27
~~~~~~~~~~~
5.4.21 Reset XCR-933e8 by momentarily depressing switch HS-93376B Iccated at I-06. WITNESL , y. 4. 22 Verify by visual observation that red lamp in FCINT E(/./ MJ/fy position 2 of XCR module located at 19310 rack IN!;:EC Og 402 point P9 goes cut indicating successful reset of XCR-9335B. 5.4.23
.._ d b _ _ _
Verify by 1ocal observation that valves HV-2254, HV-2292. HV-2242, PV-22~0 and FV-2244 alI reopened ccmpletely.
. 19 4 2-21-}7
~~~~~~~~~~~
i 5.4.24 Reset XCR-93098 by momentaril y dapressing swi tch ! HS-93078B located at I-06. CC _.EbS_____ WITNESS 5.4.25 Verify by visual observation that red lamp in ' PCINT U/f.Vg/,r7 position 3 of XCR module located at 19310 rack
- ing r ,,, - 400 point P9 goes out Indicating successful l
reset of XCR-933EB. __h Y ____
^
>cr /M !?-/^'So
, 5 . ' . C i- Verify by locar observation that valves FCV-l 5214-3. PCV-5201 and PCV-5005 all reopened completely.
$* Y '? ' f POR o WWW y __ /__ g 5 4' . .t r See />ox trtr>-ir
- 7. - sys/W blEAS' 7
- f. y .2 9 S r'f t'AR S7 'F 2 / 3h? 81 S. 9 .r0 fic ^'" 9'-d"7ffb72LM-no l
l 1
eT-217e-1 page 14 of ;g NO/E: The following steps test the SLRDIS B logic actuation of the circulator trip logic for
- a. Helium Circulator 1A.
4% Y/IIN503 s." Verify that XCR-932398 located in rack 1901 PO!NI - 7 point P7 is reset and that the red indicator
/~ '
lamp in position 3 is out. QC Verify
.b_h.____
yjl7N533 5 .2 that XCR-93137B located in rack 1001 3-26-87 pgjgg ,y yff/f7pointPil is reset and that the red indicator
< <- lamp in position 2 is out.
N 5.5.3 Attach jumper between TB 1001-10 of I-10 and "f ~tBT ~ ~ local ground.
.YliTME3 5 a.4 Verify by
~
visual observation that the red ) ~E ~#Y ~ ~ PC'XI ~
/
3/g(findicator
/
lamp in position 3 on XCR-932398 is lit indicating actuation of XCR. C. C ___bh______ 5.".5 Verify by visual observation that the red 3-tg t)
'f;7Mg/g
,. , .3,g indicator lamp in position 2 on XCn 93137B is
,.>; lit indicating actuation of XCR.
7 Q 5.5.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 1001-10 and ~~3~5i~b~~~ ground. p 3-@
]EULPE~~~iv_
" . 5. 7 Reset XCR-932398.
M Q. 5.5.8 Reset XCR-93137B. ~~~~~0II If NA
-- 3; T.---
NOTE: The f oll owing steps test the SLRDIS B logic actuation of the circulatcr trip logic for Helium Circulator 19.
. T .' .' - . s.1 Vertiv that XCR-93241B located in rack 1001
,3/, point F5 is reset and that the red indicator
/ /- lamp in position ! is out.
1 _ _ _ a_l_R__
~.' 33 3 " c.
. Verify that XCR-o314CB located in rack 1001 >- te -5 7 p-yff j,, point F9 15 reset and that the red indicator
- i f - lamp in position 2 is cut.
Nb 5.t.! Attach jumper between TB 1001-12 of I-10 and ~ ~ 39 ~ ~{6 - EI ~ local ground.
~ .;TNE~S -
verify by visual observation that the red ~ ~3~ ~.~t'[- T)~ ~ _.hff '_!..z - indicator lamp in poultion 3 on XCR-93241B is lit Indicating actuation cf XCR. I . ____t_lS_____ l i n ".'3 ..5 Verify by <1sual observation that the red 1 - N ' C7
,;)ff indicator lamp in position 2 on XCR-931495 1s 3,j{p 07 2 l i t Indicating actuaticn of XCR.
____b _____
><S-n
' ^ ^ '
, +i _175-1 Fago 15 of al 4
p 5.6.6 Remove Jucper ir, stalled between TB 1001-12 and ground. .
- _A 5-u s,e.ff::
5.6.7 Reset XCR-902419.
~~~ ~~
5.6.8 Roset XCR-931498. ____t6t____ NOTE: The following steps test the SLRDIS B logic actuation of the circulator trip logic .for 7 Helium Circulator IC. a2.N ESS 5 Verify that XCR-932408 located rack 1 in 401
' '.U N T _
aff/rf point P7 is reset and that the red indicator
/ ' ' lamp in position 3 is out.
iCM 3SS --- -------
- s. 7 S Verify that XCR-901088 located in rack 401
" b1 Addkk7 point Pil is reset and that the red irdicator 3-tt-T7
/' lamp in position 2 is out.
5.7.3 Attach junper between TB ___fb:____ 404-5 of I-10 and J te-87 3 local ground.
' .'j pe3.;- ._7 . 4, Verify by visual observation that the red
____N_ll_____ indicator lamp in position 3 on XCR-93240B is 3- za.r7
,."31 //
. #3/>fp** lit indicating actuation of XCR.
_ _ _ _ /_4_/_L_ _ _ l 4....'. sf 7.5 Verify by visual observation that the red l ' . 4. i.'. 7hb@7 indicator lamp in position 2 on XCR-931088 3 - LV-3 7 is
/ /
lit indicating actuation of XCR. ____%G=____ , 5.7.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 404-5 and 7-88-57 ground. 7 - ut - t - _ _W __ IV ' 5.7.7 Reset XCR-922409.
- 5. 7. 8 ___Jf4_____ :
Reset XCR-931!SB. 3-L o t 7 NOTE: The following steps test the ____d4-____ SLRDIS B logic actuation of the circulator trip logic fcr y ty.;7
.. . Helium Circulator 1D.
;E'a- .3.1 Verify that XCR-902429 lccated
- in ract 401
. 41 1.'
/
a point F5 1s reset and that the red indicator
/ l a.tp in position 3 1s out.
' 'C' 5.9.2 Verify that XCR-901509 located in rack 401
~
'"*N335 point P9 ~ ~ ~ 3- ~ ~ ih.~$ i is reset and that the red indicator j f y/2f/f7 lamp in positicr. 2 as out.
5.8.0 Attach jumper between TB 404-!4 of I-10 and 1 -tes local ground, g 1-u q
b . (N ES3 5. 4 ' Verify by visual observation that the red Po1NIf indicator lamp in position : on lit indicating actuation of XCR. XCR-932428 is
.~
CC _ _ _ _0_ _ _
.8.5 Verify by visual observation that the red 3_ t %-t /
\'/]7N333
. CIMI ., 1 "/2//F 7
- indicator lamp in position 2 on XCR-93150B is f lit indicating actuation of XCR.
5.8.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 404-04 _ _ _ ./41_ _ _ _ and 3-t9-t y ground. 1 h 5 -tv- f y
- Cr4 :- i- _
5.8.7 Reset XCR-932429. M-5.8.8 Reset YCR-93150B. --~lttEI3-~ _ _ _ _L4a_ _ _ _ _ NOTE: The following steps test the SLRDIS A logic y_sg-t7 4 actuation of the circulator trip logic for Helium Circulator 1A. C,
/
5..~. b . s.f7.) 4 I( .* N I Verify that XCR-93239A located in rack 1201 _.3/A P/f7 point P7 is reset and that the red indicator lamp in position 3 is out. s 3 . n u :, . " 9.2 Verify that XCR-93107A located in rack 1:01 l' ,;M7 P11 is reset and that the red indicator 3 ts-S ) y/g/fy point
/ < ~
lamp in position 2 is out. g tz.I ___________
- 5. 9. 0 Attach jumper between TB g 10 of I-10 and P '.S -t "
.p 1ocal ground, rvg.a ; f.;.N;' ## ' ---- IOIh, *
.9.4 3/,2f/ff indicator Verify by visual lamp observation in position 0 on XCR-93209A that the red --- .l,g-g7 3
is
/ lit indicating actuation of XCR.
ICC ____kS____ 1.fj7M;;3 9. 5 Verifv by visual observation that the red 3 -M-0 7 l y;;;;7 "y /gy
$7 indicator lamp in positicn 2 cn XCR-90137A is
- g i ~~ l i t indicating actuation et XCR.
5.9.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 1201-10 and 7- ts-6 7 ground. , g.g 7 _[OU 5U
" 9.7 Reset XCR-97209A.
5.9.3 Reiet XCR-90107A. *IO ____fD.____ NOTE: The follcwing steps test the SLRDIS A logic 7-tS S 7 actuatt:n of the circulater trip logic fcr Hellum Circulator 19.
* . c - [ .: e ? .0.1 Verify that XCF-9724 A located in rack 1201
[j'g'iT ' Jh/p, p oi n t F5 1s reset end tnat the red Indicator
- < ~ lamp in position is out.
-~~G2ft[~~
FT-2176-1 Pags 17 of 21 Veri f y that XCR-93149A located in rack 1:01
\vrTNE55" EC;bl] - 3/3f10.[' 7 point P9 is reset and that the red indicator T7 ~ lamp in position 2 is out.
5.10.0 Attach jumper between TB 1001-12 of I-10 and ---3-st.e _, local ground. nTIMES3 a 10.4 Verify by vi sual obscevation that the red ~ ~3 ~ stI~.$ i3~~
' 317
/
3 f [7 indicator lamp in position 3 on XCR-93041A is
.. / lit indicatt..g actuation of XCR. ;u . . . . _ , }Mt '<.an-.. 2/1' 5 Verify by visual observation that the red - - -3. s g. e_3 J" !MT 3//J '
indicator lamp in position 2 on XCR-93149A is lit indicating actuation of XCR. NR. 5.10.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 1201-12 and ~~~7~MEY3~~ ground. q 5.10.7 Reset XCR-93241A. bb ([- 5h 5.10.8 Reset XCR-90149A.
-- del-----
3 S -'T _-_J30L.--_ 3-te-47 NOTE: The f oll owing steps test the SLRDIS A logic actuation of the circulator trip logic for Helium Circulator IC.
. .TMISS .11.1 Verify that XCR-97240A located in rack 601 . , ,;.j7 , 3ff/py~
j point P7 is reset and that the red indicator
/ lamp in position is out.
7333 .11.2 Verify that XCR-97158A located in rack 601 3- st. t ] point Pil is reset and that the red indicator ll ;7 J/Ifdh1
< & lamp in position 2 is out.
__- 05L--..- , 5.11.7 Attach jumper between TB 601-10 of I-10 and 1-sf-97 local ground. ! 7nt;3 ___ 113__--
g 8
. 11.4 Verify by visual observation that the red 3 -te.g y hdr 7 indicator lamp in position ; on XOR-9324CA is
/ # lit indicating actuation of XCR.
[. ) ___hEb---- j.. ;7M ;5 .11.5 Verify by visual cbservation that the red 3,gg,d 7 !,i ;j;.;7 p indicator lamp in position 2 or. XCR-90175A is lit indicating actuaticn of XCR. __-YSs---- 5.11.6 Remcve jumper installed between TB 601-10 ano 3.ts.c 7 ground. N[ 1-1F4) l
$2[d32(~_~IU
! 5.11.7 Reset XCR-9 240A.
--~AE P 5.11.8 Reset XCR-9017eA. > li'6 T ~
-__ ES-_---
1- 16 87 i
FT-2176-1 Page 18 of 21 NOTE: The following steps test the SLRDIS A logic actuation of the circulator trip logic -for Helium Circulator 1D. Qc WITNESS .12.1 Verify that XCR-93242A 1ocated in rack 601 p int P5 is reset,and that the red indicatcr PolNT' #a/n r - lamp in position 3 1s out. CO
- ____dS_____
tl/*TH5$$ 12 2 Verify that XCR-93150A located in rack 601 J. tt-t 7 f :1MT < 3S/!/7_ point P9 is reset and that the red indicator
< ' l a.rp in position 2 is out.
____M.,____ 5.12.3 Attach jumper between TB 601-12 of I-10 and 3-7.t-t 1 local ground. CC _____%____ 12.4 Verify by visual observation that the red 3 -tv.s1
'p' ;;g 7 tic 5 y"p/py indicator lamp in position 3 on XCR-93240A is f < lit Indic.ating actuation of XCR.
<*ff r
_____M ____
. ,7,N,Q 5. 2.5 Verify by vi sual observation that the red ) 2 ,.gg
, ;g7 3/,y/f7 indicator lamp in position 2 on XCR-73150A is
< 1it indicating actuation of XCR.
_____Bl!____ 5.12.6 Remove jumper installed between TB 601-12 and J44dl ground. 5.12.7 Reset XCR-93242A. 3_L _ E 4 5.12.9 Reset XCR-90150A. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3@-W _____41.___ 7-te-17 W
FT-2176 *. Paga 19 of 21 NOTE: The following steps test operation of the coil monitor circuit of HV-2001 Control Interlock Relay TR-2001-1. NOTE: It is assumed that Steam Water Dump System interlock circuitry to HV-2201 is energi:ed and operational. V/ITHESS Verify by visual observation of red indicator 33.1 POINI .7/4//y'
' ' ~
l amp located on bay 701 point P5 that indicator lamp circuitry is operational. Lamp should be lit indicating that Interleck Rel ay TR-2001-1 is not energi:ed. W 5.13.2 Lift one side of jumper between points TB 1004-6 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ {o~ UE'~ and TB 1004-7.
-QC gys ,V/ITN E- Verify by visual cbservation of red indicator s A 3,e0 ~ ~ ~ }~.li~.ii ~
- PCINT , 5/A//s y. lamp located on bay 701 point F5 that indictor
/ lamp goes out, k
5.13.4 Reland lead lifted in step above. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~0 70
- , L .tS 4' '
- WITNESS
.13. Verify by visual observation that l amp relights.
M - IV NI-
- r, 5/.:
y -
-- 4------
NOTE: The f ollowing steps test operation of the coil } -t%-M l monitor circuit of HV-2015 Control Interlock l Relay TR-2215. NOTE: It is assumed that Steam Water Dump System ) interlock circuitry to HV-2215 i s energi:ed and operational. C "* Verify by visual observation of red Indicator
- 5. 4.1 pdlTNESS lamp located on bay 901 point F5 that indicator s'CINT, [_ /M lamp circuitry is cperational. Lamp should be i lit indicating that Interlock Relay TR-2215 1s
- not energi:ed.
SIL 5.14.2 Lift one side of jumper between points TS 1204-7 ~~~~57Ei~63~
,, and TB 1204-9.
i <- l
- ' TTil2'3 5 14.0 Verify by visual observation cf red indicator ~ ~ 1- ~ ~ @~i[lI
. OlHI [~f/ lamp located on bay 901 point P5 that indictor
~ lamp goes out.
i j NL pu41 5.14.4 Reland lead 1:fted in step abcve. 7&EBE
, ~ -----
kr%---- i ~ 1,7.-J. ".14.5 Verify by visual observation that l amp relight s. 3-u AT
---- sh-- wwn,
4' 3/2f//J
< c
\
FT-2176-1 Page 20 of 21 NOTE: The following steps test operation of the coil monitor circuit of HV ~'217 Control Interloct Relay TR-2017. NOTE: It is assumed that Steam Water Dump System interlock circuitry to HV-2217 is energt:ed and operational. ke* F.15.1 Verify by visual observation of red indicator Y/IIII23f- lamp located on bav 701 point P5 that indicator PO NT _.33y/sy lamp circuitry is' operational. Lamp should be
/ /
lit indicating that Interlock Relay TR-2017 is not energi:ed. .
~ ' ~ ~
5.15.2 Lift one side of jumper between points TB 1204-7 and TB 1204-9.
]~-d.~f 7 cc ____b3____
,y/;7Ngg3 , 15.! Verify by vitual observation of red indicator 3.tg.t 7
- g. : ' INT
, 3>'//87 1**P 1 C*t'd " b^V 701 P 1"t F5 th*t 1"dict P lamp goes out.
5.15.4 Re1and 1ead 1ifted in step above. _ _ P_ t8- E_ M _ (; ,... .. [i'k_lHL_tM_
.>-:c e ' I V
~~~~
' 'l ' '
"j"" Verify by visual observation that lamp re',ights.
3 u g, NT _ _ _ _@_(_ ,, _ NOTE: The following steps test operation of the coil monitor circuit of FV-2205 Control I n t er l e,c l . Relay TR-2005. NOTE: It is assumed that Steam Water Dump System interlock circuitry to FV-2005 is energi:ed and operatiertal. C" 5.16.1 Verify 'by visual cbservaticn of red Indicator ' ;7MI l a tt p located on bay 901 point F5 that indicatcr S"- . lamp circuitry is operational . Lamp should be lit indicating that Interlock Relay TR-2205 1s not energt:ed. Lift one side of jumper between points TB 1204-7 ____ Q 3-tB-g7 5.16.0 ge- and TB 1204-9. _____8____ 1573333"16.": . Verify by visual observation of red indicator 3-M -57 7 2MM lamp located on ba'/ 901 point F5 that incictor Iamp goes out. O 5.16.4 Reland 1ead 1iited in step abo.e. ~ ~ ~ T ~LN~ _ _3__Ohl!" M i.WIV
!7MCS. 16.5 Verify by visual observation that lamp relights.
1/2!If?
.'iN T < _ - _3.u _$.n
FT-2176-1 Pcga 21 of "' I
- XCR : Response Time :
! XCR-9004A I g g Jg 4,g y XCR-9306A : o,g fcc gp.pygy :
XCR-932SA l - IcG /"n M
--___-_-___-__-__-_--_-___--_--- -__-__----__- E'7- /9'5 0
- XCR-9304B p , g ,g g.22 y :
l XCR-93~68 l o,g ygc [gy , yy Sy) ; fQ /r/r4
- XCR-93 SB -
p, f g XCP-9005A
! C ,5"gc [ Alr -J2 5 f) :
- XCR-9307A : C 0 R'- (N r - 2.4 /] :
l XCR-9 '9A l - l2'E k
---- -_---_- -----_-__--------- _---_--_----_ 9 7 - 1/h XCR-9335B g , 7 pc ( h -c'W XCR-9037B l c f pc. (ffU22ct) :
l,., q3 l XCR-93 98 l - : *92 c -
- e. , - 1 .] ,, -
.17.1 Male a copy of the Test Equipment Section (0.1),
include the FT 4 and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/ A thi a step. L., b 2-i 1
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OR!G' NAL O SerVlCO'wPUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC hR No. FY- 2l *%r l SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE /d/ CATEGORY TY PE: C CN OVERAu. C CN SUBYlTTAL C SETPCINT CHANGE REPORT M TEST REQUEST C TEMPCR Ar'Y CCNFIGUR ATICN REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FS AR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES 'NVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASS I 8 YES C NO ENGINEERED S AFEGUARD 2 YES C NO S AFE SHUTDOWN 3 YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM d YES C NO S AFETY RELATED N YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEY C YES E NO REYARKS kDb
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEYS. CCYPCNENTS. CCUIPYENT, TESTS. E.XPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FS AR OR TECH SPECS? X YES C NO UST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED /. Ed la.E * . _ .]
bs.& % l. 9*.Z..l0. 9 Y/. % %f, J b b'I.1 W Z 1 W. $ . 5. $. Y I.QW t _5L1
/ V,
.L5ddC217* 313. W ' 'CL Z M 4' 4' i f N 5 . / 1 4r.b .f'd. 4N+XM+-
17 L /5Ad, . 2 7 L % 2Gn g )eLdf) l
+ 20 [0 M 4/
2 L,
.K.
.1, 4 s h DS,/
. -- 7dL/ de- /_ s,a as e 4/. 2 , /.
- 2. OCES THE ACTIVITY REQUlRE TH AT CH ANGE(S) BE YADE TO THE FS AR CR TECH SPEC? U YES 2 NO L!ST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE YACE 3- CETER%NE W HETHER CR NOT THE ACIF iTY iNYCLV ED is AN UN AEV EWED S AFET4 QUESTION UTlU2iNG THE FOLLOWING GUCEUNES.
(A) H AS THE PROB AB:UTY CF CCCL ARENCE CR THE CONSEOUENCES OF AN ACC: CENT OR YALFUNCTION OF EQUIPYENT lYPORTANT TO S AFETY PREvt0VSLY EVALU ATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED? U YES 3 NO STATE B ASIS N #- N _ A M !_% /A3 4 L O Ff-_ CO M i T'n M cav M ==~! M f. r3 h*7's* M -v~#-2 7* M 1#-fars & r_ a r vtMmr, d er r- A>a o d .5 s' ED }_5 & A T)A4 6 1n 1 L ,L1rY'" S f 3 V $ SA) {Vf W hL\ W_!*AAO \ , art --c-e_e.B m'2m c' co LA LTr c LA r3 . 7 ba."Po Of*G. v L, A 4:<i M #~n / _Au,4_Kgr-d e cMM n m . W h Eb) Au Enef "s es':d M ^ L Pu Qt m e.M i AM t C Q QM4'* b e iBl M AS TME POSSIB!UTY OF AN ACCIDENT CR Y ALFUNCTlCN OF A CiFFEAENT TV PE TH AN ANY EVALUATED PREviCUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CRL4TED) C YES 2 NO STATE B ASIS __ME 3 A (C) H AS TrE Y A AG:N CF S AFETY. AS DEFtNED INiHE B ASIS FCA ANY TECwNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REDUCED) C YES 2 NO STATE BASIS 4 ._ / t.v M i t S 412 7.5, w ,d M S <; # _ l_ t"b FC W r' & >%, *,a r (Yeu + . _
,h &2 i r 5. ~-41 7" v 6:*J?_) Foes W &
t* u'b 'J~ C E~~ t_.fY / of.g ! C__ & W /- .%D !2 J._'". PODe~'*r.Af. /rc dD?[
'" N ** "QT/ O O S A g y_ W (-- % e -t-
/ 5 /P3._) AU A g _ Lee-A Cr*1 %;% > w gaa java .
W r-< A be~T V:K A r e W & J-it# M r-AsL r eb '*c H 5>T'fn d.ec.L sus e;l 5p;4 ?,
/~
CCES THE ACTP.lTY APPEAR TO (N vCLs f AN UNREwEW ED S AFETY QUESTION 2 YES M NO BE S AFETY SIGNiFlC AQ 2 YES 'h. Np - By u .
.A db
/7MM -
b APPROVED - [aN u . ..,
^'
__m;nm _ _ _ _ .___ _ _____
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SOfVICO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN & f720$~f NO. 177 Z/ 74 - /
PAGE / a4 ./ ~ CATEGORY TYPE: E CN Overal1 C CN Submittal /~ 7 - 2,/ pf -/' Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? R Yes O No State basis Ed_Ac:Z2V17"/ 6-5 Al' ^- C a n d a )& h 'LT? Yt/A- 2.68 C20st' 6U/LbinQ %C6iAJF BU/L.bwG ithsbWACC.F 1 L 8&yB&DykhU-ma rwo. Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? Z Yes W No Applicable Regulations NOTE. If ertser sesser s Yes the actxty coes r~ct rsci.e an unres ered enuront"entat questo Sign and date the form If both ansas sr a?e No, the act v tv has the potent at tot creat:rg ar unrevesea enwronmental avest on Comotete the rema ncer of th.s esaivatcon fc?m 4 _ : Isi ..hm ,.. 13if respdred) l 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (Set 0-3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity inscived is an unreviewed environmental question using the foDcwing guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis: i l (B) Will th s actr.ity result in a significant ct'ange in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a signif. cant increase in the authorized power level) Z Yes Z No State bas;s: (C) Does this activity invoNe an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis: Does the actMtv invoNe an unrevtewed environmental quest on) Z Yes X No ey _& . . . .
.sJA> =. ,
f) Aporowed t=4dNw __M_il 3 C. A x h..oppa 17eae sry ; l . , /o , m v. m u2
{' Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION pg
, 9 7- / Nd - - SerVICgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO /
PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE / OF /D PRQCEDUR E NO.. F T-ri n -/ ISSUE NO. T6TLE pr reA <nciyQ, nup F4 Z% PAGE NO3 CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE PARA.NO. fria w r'. .c o .t d rd/$ ,Ji j k !.fot & s / S 4l.S*/.4./ ww F 'd 4 r TJ /E C 7. ' THa s- = J s~ 3 . H
- Th' vif.4'y to # 78
^
TI S Ul'I V/9 i Vi S s pra is 's
,$ g,igmn,o s 7?id r~ c,% M7/raf 7M 7- 4 Wdc r+'0 Ey
/'C C P / /f F* t * !! '/ .S~/ A .C Z S ,Cf o /* E
/Cef / ,,.
S,*/t ' r Oc tDN AvD fy, p ; 7$ _, s/A>c d TM f V4 s A'fS TI/cf6 w/t t'ff
// t ? 53, /JV- 7 N3, ,,gg,g g,,p p,97) y
// r - 229/, iW - t ? H, g.y sia n y j? y 7"' ff' //s /? c)/ .s nev A e.
//c it< d yiv o
))v ??t3 / 4~D ras 7S.O 8Y F V- 220.7 t'IN f r- 2 ) fr - q
f / (- CN $ C Pt:AA ri o A> .s D eds iv o 'r- ta r s H 70 s l i$E' $ >"/ [ $ $ [ VA i Vf) A 0 7A D M)fd M 7t//J h(4/r.
.-+- A if _
j Y-1n 9 j
- W C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROvt07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: MEVPOR ARY ISINGLE Usti S C NO LS EC REV!EW REQUIRE 07 2 ,7 C LOMTERM TEMPORARY . EXPIRES VES C NO S QC REY!EW REQUIREQ7 /,( / ,'yNNENT. DCCF ATTACHE
/ ' C OCR .00R ATTACHED 3 /M' M APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
- - .-- Xe '
# ~' ASbPERVISOR'S S8G'N ATUREI / 10 ATE)
EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL Yh YI Hn l'Eb W
- l'~ b 's E* t/*d I '-
-/ ffa/l t *E:U: RED FCR ALL MAINTE%A%CE. RESUL TS TECHNICAL SPECiftCA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMIMSTMETIVEPROCEDURESI l
QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
- 0 .j/[*
PECU, RED If WORK REQUIRES OC OR INVOLVES TESTINdOR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUtPVENTI APPR e V ALS t r AN; MANAGEMLNI S T AFF DATE ,
, PL.AhT MANAGEVEN STAFF DATE ;
. . . .. , , . , - : / . ..~ vh 4)'/_,t(f W. F /7 m RESPCNS:BLE FOR PERSON DATE /- PROCEDURE AV7HORt2ER DATE j * -
~ **
. Hs S Gs / ,,,
? -l? ~ N Y
' PORC MEETING Nvv6ER OATE
< / / ,/
EA T ENC EO uPiR A TiCN RESPONSi8LE FCR PERSON DATE DATE PORC VEETING NvM8ER DATE Ex T ENCEO DPiR AT.GN RESPONS.BLE FCR PERSON QATE l DATE. l PORC VEET.NG Nvv8ER DATE LA T ENCEO LAPiR A T.GN RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE D A TE. POR C VE ET.NG NvMBER DATE Fe,* F 372 E 3385 INITIATOR.FCRW ARD CR.G.NAL TO FCRC CLERK ATTACH CCPY TO PROCEDURE BEiNG DEVtATED CTHER COP ES FOR VSE AS NEC l 1 .. . .
'.k
/ %
'Q,'
'pyhllg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION pg, F 7"/ bD SOfVlCO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PAGE O OF PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PROCEDURE NO. j ISSVE NQ. } TITLE CT-2/74~} l l
$idTg CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE d'/ V E2s/ V dy t .se s t T/p/ S /S / r b.
. /. 6 Vtf'/ /ec ,/ c.
< asun . . . usu- - -, a ~ o rn, -
t14 / v'f f //i> - ?: n',= if ll X /t / 4A '/ Ec '/ #d. N v - ?? GI, H l' - ?.! 9), (?w 7,7 ( 7- p, y,,pg f V ~ d ? 2 ) , AV -IJcY], /~c f. 77/ E SN#4/f XC st C'tr> tac 75 H F - 2 ?C/, H u -??c) N!TN
,/) w g p y . 7 2 6 f" 141S of/A 7 4~ 0 i)/d t Arc Poay YH E 52{SE g p:rgio , S'/5 7~f/t/ l/ A t I'd S lasr(, Bd Vf// fifG Y5 l "I k$i T /c n /drd C /OS / 7/t N f o C A f.- ' g c s usur,e s n'7x TY "'
eis.stsve n ... (,yz,y gygg (' f Ai 7 i N v i 7 Y 7E S '_. s're /w A 7*C If PS AT 7HfSd O/ 40& Gf No to 4 Y pe rg,z LMi l/ 6S di' - M, /,e 0 [Et( /A' 7& l~' C /" fr ,// ' 4N4?iATCR DATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APPROVED? DEYlATiON (.ATEGORY: C TEMP 5RARY i$1NGLE U$t) C LONG TERM TEMPORARY - EXPtRES C YES C NO IS EQ REVIEW RIOuREDr C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACMED C YES C NO IS QC REVIEW Af 0VPEO? C 00R COR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED io ATEi isuPERviSOR s siGNATvREi QAIL EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL 1REcu RED scR Att MA19TEyAscE. REsut is TECnwCAL sPEciriCArroN svRVEltLANCE. AND ADM#STRA TIVE PROCEDURESJ OATE l i QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
, REcu RED If WCRK REQU:RES QC 04 INVCtvES TESh%G OR MA1%TENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPME%h
[ - APPReVALS GAIk PLAN T MANAu(MEN I $ AFF . 5RQ QAlt j e%A?eI M ANAulMtNI ST AFF DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORL2ER CATE RESPONStSLE FOR PERSON (
~
PORC MEETING hvM86R QATE
~
CATE LA T ENOED DPzR ATION RESPON5iBLE FOR PERSON DATE. DATE PCR C ME ET4NG NLMB ER DATE LA T EN;ED LAP,RA TICN RESPCNS.8tE FCR FER$CN r DATE
' CATE l . ' PCRC MEETING NLMSER l
~ CATE E.AIENOED LAP R ATiCN ~ RESPONS 86E FOR PER5CN DATE DATE ,
PORC MEETtNG NUMSER 8 c m .F i J72 3> 2385 INITIATOR.FORW ARD OR$NAL TO PCRC CLf At ATTACM COPY TO RROCIOLRE SE:NG DEVIATED OTMER CCP
M .
/.
g{ FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
~PubllC ,g3 Servicee PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 9 7"/ND PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 3 OF NO i TITLE PROCEDURj/
FT~c 74 ~ l l ISSUE NO. MI CHANGED FROM CH ANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE
*f,b~. J. ~7 l' N O WV Md A
(, p ygJ /p t 44 yAtt4 , c df ad vdAS fA" NfAA Af soif/]lT (( sot /// Af" /)] 6yf4 77/d:C 4,9iM icr/C p'ct di /C /* D /h2f3 f Sv 6 N r!!. f f j, jq pff //y te/ TH V u t f'/ A N l'M V5' pgi ug e SSHvW ods/2'o stC 7Wr pM7 .- W t efC ^'P Nff i
/)u/) //v-22O/ Ad (Y t .5 / Chr A f!H'f, INii tA T G R OATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APPRON Eo? DEVIATION CATEGCRY: C TEMPCR ARY ($l ngl'U$El C YES C NO IS EO REVIEW REOUIRE0? O LONG TERM TEVPGA ARY . E.XPIRES C 4ES C 40 IS CO REv:EW REOUIR ED7 C PERMANENT-CCCF ATTACHED C OCR 00R ATTAGMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ISUPERVISOR S SIGN AfbREI iC ATEI CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tREL"RED FOR ALL MAATE%A%CE RESULTS TECHN! CAL SPECiflCAD0% SURVE:LLANCE. AND ADMMSTR Arlbf PROCEDURESI l
DATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL oRECuiRED if WORK REQUIRES OC CR sVOLVES TEshNG CR VAhTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED E0utPVENT)
.,, APPR e V ALS .
e' ANI VANAutMENI hi Af f DATE PLAN T MANA.,svtN T S T Af f . 5RQ GAIE RESPCNS.8LE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDLME AUTHORt2ER DATE PORC MEETING NLY8ER gCATE I
$ ;SCER DPrR ATiON RESPONS'8LE FCR PER$0N QATE DATE PCR C VEET'NG
. NLv8 ER DATE u ? EN;E0 EA PM AT.ON #ESFON5 ISLE FGR FER$GN QATE
(, DATE-PORC YEETiNG NLV8ER DATE D u TEN;ED ue R AT.ON RESPCN5 ISLE FOR PER5CN CATE DATE DATE ,* PORC MEET 6NG NVV8ER F :,e m 86372 E 1385 INITI ATOR.FCR A A8C CR4NAL TO PC1C C.ERE ATTACH COPY TO PROCipvRE gE,NG CEVATED OTHER COP E5 8CR USE AS NECESSAR'
o*,
*- i n ,.a FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
/. Public Pom NO.
-/j SOfVlCO: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO _
PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF'- /b PROCEOVR E NO ISSUE NO. TITLE F 7~- E / 7b * / piSiNO[ N CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CH ANGE
~
A #5 JfS.I.I2 PE,e'/FV 6V ..o Vl //f V 8 '/ o *o
,cy.jzog,Scv.5214-I F L/ ~ 2 2 O T .
- Aug g v . y j ,4 . z.
S S. I. / 7.1 N Ftv l'tW /f */ 77/ 4 7~ (~t n 7 d e 7 " && - 933M
-I r 5* cteJeo ay J/) f i4 $ k A ! A> 6 (oAsY=*
I A) D ! T Y s4CecSS 7/dx/i A: /;rt $0 /<o 75 7.e noz-37,3C,
,4 Y .T-/0. ,
4,N. i. 24 verif y EY D ard W -
/C(& ...
g<l*y&c l'
. y pga Nt't A M NSd
/:_' A / <- T A 9 2 0 "l ,
iM T .A r ; R CATE C v!S C NO IS PROCEDLRE PORC APPRos!OP DEVIATION CATEGCRY: C TEYPOR ARY ($ INGLE U$1) [ C Y E .4 C NO iS EQ REV'EW RECU)REO? C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY .!)P RES C YE5 C NO 1S QC REVIEW RECU:RE0? C PERM ANENT OCCF ATTACHED C CDR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
< supervisor s SIGNATURE ioATli GATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL oME3VRED FOR ALL mat %TE%AACE. RESUL TS. TECM%' CAL SPECJtCA TION SURVilLLA NCE. AhD ADM:4ISTRA TA E PROCECURESI QATE QUALITY CONTP.0L APPROVAL
, RE: *ED if WORK R!CU'RES QC OR INVOLVES TESTi%G OR mat % TENA NCE ON SAFETY MELA TED EOui!VE%T)
.. APPR e VALS <
rJNi YANAutVENT b T AFF GAIE h.ANI MANAutMENT bT A66 bMu part R ESPCNS-SLE FCR PERSON CATE PROCEDURE AUTMORt2ER DATE j PCR C YEET.NG NLMBER cAig
'Le T ENC E D LxP'R ATiON RESPGNb SLE FCR PER$0N CATE DAi!.
PORC YEETING NLYBER CATE l
- LATENCEL EAP,R AT CN RESPGNS.8tt FOA FER50N i DATE l ,/~'* . DATE l
l } PCRC VEETiNG NLY8ER DATE I o , E N _ R .1.c N - RES, ENS E.c m R5;N o.1E oA1E l PORC MEETING NLVSER DATE g , , .. 8ew 8 3, r 3385 thmATOR.80R A ARD CR.G NAL TO PCpt C',EmL ATTACM COPY TO PROCECLRE sE NG CEviATip OTHER CP ES 8CR 45E A5 NE;E;5AP*
e ',
,e' y ...,
FORT,ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION A-Pubile in No. 9 7- / #! b Servicer PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE [ OF !b PRO EDV EN ISSUE NO. TITLE p$3[T CHANGED FROM CHANGE 0TO REASON FOR CHANGE sed '4 So VC 6 f./. 2 7 paso y p ,,, p g m, g G2A Ar 74 sec 7. V Fa'I F y' to i yp pp,,,fy y,yg
$'h 2. 5 C N N N l' N $ 7M ?
ClfA'// 7/C.0 $ 7)/4 7 lN/ / /$ nr U Y DOC l / /j he (ty CN'< r acirw gr ij S// a 7 L)oto r) IN4 7" L/d/ t/dt*S
// V - / /5.f, Ny-?? ff,
/// Vu-- ?? 22 34l; #y 2?2 f,
, Wy-??c/,
/n-72oy 4:n Fy-??o$" $N hh OkS"N.
iN. r.A r c R oAu DEVI ATION CATEGORY: C itVPORARY i$;NGLE US() YES C NO l$ PROC 10VRE PORC APPRosE07 C LONG TERM TEMPORARY . EXPlR($ C YES C N0 iS EO REVEw R ECUiRf D? C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C Y(5 C NO i$ CC REVIEW REQV' REQ 7 C OCR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED 10 AT Ei ISUPE RVISOR'S SIGN ATUREI DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL iREX-RE) FCR ALL MA:hlE% ANCE. RESUL TS. TE3NICAL SPEC;flCA TION SURVEILLANCE. A%D ADu:\tSTRATIVE PROCEDURES) DAlt QUAllTY CONTROL APPROVAL RECU: RED W WORK REQUIRES QC CR > WOLVES TE$T;hG OR MAINTE%ANCE ON SAFETY RELATED EQUIPVENTI e APPReVA GAJ4 PLAN MANAutMtNTSTAFF.5RQ 0416 ruNI VANAutMtNT 61 AFF DATE PROCEDLRE AUTHCRJER DAT( atSPONS SLI FOR PERSON OArg PCRC MttiiNG NLMetR Cart i EA f tNO10 LAPrRAT6CN RESPONS BLE FCR PERSON j D ATE. DATE l POAC ME ETING NUMBER La t tN;.6 0 LAER A riCN RESPON6 661 FGR PtR5GN DAff ' ^ DATE OT? t PORC MitTING NLMBEM w' RESPON5,6Li FOR PERSON OATE l LA T ENC tG LAPtR AT.ON I DAt!. PCR C VE ETING N',M8 E R DA78 DLRE 8E.NG CEV1Af t3 OTHEd COP gg FCR L!E A5 NE;iS5Ae Fym F. 3'2 311385 INf71ATOR.8CRWARD ORIG NAL TO PCRC CLERK ATTACH CCPY TO PR*
** e t
e i ' ), Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ,g, SOfVICO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 2 7 ' / '!SJ
] PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF b PROCEOLatNo 155LE No. TITLE
- r -2/ 7/ -f h$hNo( CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE W/ /J '/ dy tec4c SEE ddC V[
blf,2. {, VC" /f/ LI V fo Mt. o*- o& raw 1non Tsu r l/M WS H t'- ?2SI,
// V - ?? f f, /)I'- 22 'i/,
f V 2 2 2 't, /v-zz ff , jj y . H v - /c3 g e x7 270/'22DT fv- GM pc ,c u t t y 6.p d A) , f,lf, f*) lR* f t / /C A' / t' f/1 f- ?[b ' U # $ 0 8 3 f a L'fA C H'W (33p,1y( p ,,, C44 s dL4 74 0
$7:/wi< 7 C tW S 4 7""
vnt v E S H v-2253 14 mt) N t'-2 20 / A v0 v pi/ /f '/ 7W'77~
- fC(d& 6/SfA>f/f INi T. A?CR ggig C YES C NO IS Pa0CEDURE PCaC APP 90sto? OEN1ATION CATEGORY: C TEVPOR ARY iS1NGLE USEI C Yt$ C NO IS f 0 RiviEW R f CU: RID? C LONG TERM TEMPORARY . EJPiRES
- DES C NO IS CC R EV!EW RtOviRED? C PERM ANENT DCCF ATTACHED C OCR OCR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED iSuPtRvisoR S siGNATuRai icaTi, DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL 1RECutRED FOR ALL mat %TE% A%CE RESULTS. TECH %ICAL SPEC:fiCATION SURVE!LL ANCE. A%D ADM.NISTM A TIVE PROCEDURESI QATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL in!2 RED If WORK REQUIRES QC CR IWCLVES TESTWG OR MA!NTE% ANCE C% SAFETY RELA TED EQuiPME%T)
~
APPReVA rLANI YANAutMtNT b! Af f QAli MN MANAukMLNI $T Atf 5MQ QATE AtSPCNS 4LE FCR PERSCN CATE PROCEDLag AyTHCRLCf R CATE PCAC MEET 4NG NvvetR - grig LATEN 0tp LAP A AT CN Pt$PGN$ 3LE fC4 PERSON CATL DATE PQa C VE ETtNG NLY8 tR Daft in T L NO LO D P>R A T.C N #($ PONS, ggt f GR P(R$QN ggtg D CATE PCaC Mg EtiNG Nove ER CAft v LA *tN;(O DP RAI4N ~ R&S7GNi,661 FCA PER5ON CAT ( DATE PCRC ME ET-NG NLM8 ER CATE 8 m f M 3} D85 INIT1AT04 FCRA AAD 08 G NAL TO PCRC CLlat ATTACH CCPY TO PRoctDv a l SE.NG 0(MAf t0 OTmER COP E5 FC' LSE As Nt:155&n.
o ,
, o g, .
v . FORT
- ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION M< Public um ~0 I7 ~ / bg SGIVlCgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO l PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 7 OF /2-PO SSUE NO. TITLE D{ E,N _
ol CH ANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CH ANGE Nkl."No CAW HE<<A 3 ff *A86VC
$,/f, 2, -)
QwT, )
' /lk 4 ! / CO/!wMs)f 6 V fre YHad SAli7/cioIC5 /u tic / C-
/112 0fffl CY.C f&i, fS,2. /k W//f y. w W1,! , , , V FA t f >' to '7A * * =
})v-??of m Q HV-22of .2'c n-/
Wlt- $2/3 Att h o s ts) c m R f r/V y a O hk f& /[${ ~ uF N V TM f
* * * (gn 7 /) { f (k = *bA f
/$ ff C $$k Y
/ Wo*l
# $Nf/ D $n (p r T / <+ Q ,
iff/c56 7 f 4 ai s',4 f t h' ' ^ / S T d letJ.7z 73 k 7" 5.)Q, OATE 6N TAAICR 4 DEVtATION CATEGORY; C TEVPOR ARY ISINGLE USE) C YES C NO IS PROCEDUmf PORC APPR0sto? O LONG TERM ttVPOR ARY EXPtRIS C YES C NO IS EQ RENifW REQU!Rf D? C PERMANENT - DCCF ATTACHED O YES O NO IS OC REMEW RIOV;mEO? O OOR.00R ATTACMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (CATD
! SUPERVISOR S SiGNATUREI CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL iME UtRED FOR ALL MA:kTEA AhCE. RESUL TS. TECNN: CAL $PECJICATIONSURhE!LLANCE, AND ADM;%ISTRATIVEPROCEDURES) i cAit QUAllTY CONTROL APPROVAL 1RE:u,REo so wcR c REOv;MES OC OR IWOL VES TESDNG CR MAWTE% A NCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EOutPVEN D APPReVA QATE P L.AN MANAukMtNT 5T Af 6 5RJ CAlt rLAN T MANAvivlN T ST AFF RESPONS SLE FOR PgmSON DATE PROCEDLRE AUTHOR.2ER CAft POR C MEET 6NG NLV6tR CAII l
l Catg LAT E%{D LAPiR A TION RESPQNS.8LE FCR PERSON DAtt. DAfg POR C ME ETING NLM8 t R R(5PCN5 8(g FCR P[R$CN gAfg LA T E NCtQ EAP4A T.C N A Daft
- CATE k POa C MtET.NG Nov e En
~CAtg LAT&NCED LAP RAtiCN Al$PCN4BLE FCR F(RSCN QAf t.
CAT ( POR C MEET 6NG NLMBE R Fo - H 372 313385 14mATOR.FCR A ARD CA G NAL TO PCRC CLER A. ATTACH CCPY TO PROCIOL R g st NG Oty1 Aft 0 OTata CCP ES FCR USE AS NECESSAP
- y O J o
* ,W -s 1.:q p.a .
/, FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENI: RATING STATION Public reno.
9 7 / g Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ( ' PyCptyyN,0g ,, pSSui NO. PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT Tau PAGE 2 OF !b l^H.To' CHANGED FROM l CHANGE 0TO REASON FOR CH ANGE v m rv av icesc w w v sv ior n M d o' " 7 ri 2.17 Y v-ZZCS"; eoo F V -Z? of ...
~
fl V-3 ? / 4 -I sl u t) fr v - 7 2 t f . F T, z .2 6 VNir Y dy... .d /c 472-- y,'$., m /fg6 fan F24 A r 78 607. 9 $',5.f~ vrsiFV... p u-tzc9 v rsi r y . . . i= vruo&
/
pc v -n , q . 5, ,.y v . AM sa faa y S?ct ma Sc y - W 6 ^' . SJcS~ as; mc
.Ca n y cydd, Ndw pr%gx ndt- -
clr.7.27 F;A /1r TB / 00 7 iN.T ATCR
- cAfg C 4ES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPR0sto? CEVATION C ATE 3 CRY. C TEVPORARY i$ INGLE USE)
C YES C NO IS iO R EVIEW R EOU<R ED' C LONG TERM TEVPOR ARy . E.xpiRES - C YES C NO 15 CC R EvtEW R EOv1RE0? C PERMANENT DCCF ATTACHED C OCR 0CR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED . ISLPERvtSOR S SIGNATURE > ID ATE # DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL ,_
>RE:sRED FOR ALL MA;%TE% A%CE RESUL TS. TECH %tCAL SPEC;f CA h0% SURh E!LLA%CE. A%D ACM:NISTRA D\ E RROCEDURES)
DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
, *ECL"RED 19 wCMr RECusRES CC CM IWCL VES TESDNG OM VA!%7E% ANCE CN SA FETY MELA TED EQu1PME%D
/ . APPReVA FLAN T V AN AugVENT S T Atf LATE PLAN VANautMENTSTArt aMy gAlt l
RESPCNS.SLE FCR PERSON CATE PROCEOyRE AUTMOR,CER DATE PCRC VEET NC NvVSER QATE 4 l E A T EN0t3 LAP'R A TiCN RESPCNS OLE FOR PERSCN QATE CATE PCR C VE ETiNG NLYS ER DATE EA !cN;,iG LAP R AfiCN RESECNS 6LE FCA PERSCN DAIE e- QATE PCR O YE ET.NG NLY8 Em CATE
~.._.
EiTEN;ED LAP R AT,CN RESPCNS1 ELE FOR PERSCN CATE DATE PCRC YE ET'NG NLV 8 ER DATE F;re 8 3'2 30 3386 iMTIATOR 8CR.% ARC CRTNAL TO PCR0 CLERE AT'A M CcPy ?o peoCgogAE SE NG CEVATED OTHER COP ES s:A .SE A3 AECESSAn
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
e , t l , ,- ,r- :44 . FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public s./ Pea w PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 8 7 " / I< I -, m SerVICO __ 8 PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF /b PROCEOba,J NO ISSUE NO. TITLE f7-c//4-) MITo' CHANGED FROM f CH ANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE
- p. s.s a n y s.i... w~ v n . . . ut ~
f~L/ - ? .'C{,, /4 V- L'/'l /~ V - ?? C (o s'y /?d fr v - 5 Z o l AnD ~),Af tc rio ct y e,4,u , IN V
- 5 Je f A d L.
/l/L fit it '/ 6l:'t'iG, 9 f,3. y fo 3 i 7 J c A' t a n t. / ?c ! '! 'e ss / OW c as rae ra t ... caCravf/S . ..
f)v-2?oZ A~0 />v-2?ca AuO (C V - S 2 l 'l- f A r p VryiF~V , L' f'd s f 4 e ee AffEWS /]ddMJ $ Vf Ut*/n , S vs inir , ,
\
Itf y, j sf j' t ; if y tvo7H ' l'ff ! f 'l tv
- T t) , , ;
/JV~II'E S*TH o
,,e // t' - ??t % 4\ 0 i f ( y _S p i ; . 3 ,apiz, <!c o f f J t' pay /r/ff y ,
0 e $ r <> r u .r?E 7 I r V. iN i T . A T om gAlg C vis C NO IS PRoClotRE PCRC APPRCstD) DEVI ATICN CAT EGORY: C itvPCR ARY (StNGLE USE) C Tr$ C NO #S EQ RivT.v R10g Rip; C tong TERV TEMPCR ARY. txP RES O PERM ANENT. DCCP ATTACHED 2 Yt$ C NO IS CC atVIEW REOVistD? C 00R.004 ATTACHic APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ISLPE RVISCR S $1GNATLREI eD ATE-CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL in!:v:MED rOR ALL Mat %TE% A%CE RESULTS TECWCAL SPEC:CICA TIO% $L4h E'LLA%CE A%0 ACM.\:STRa fik t PROCEOeAESI DAT6 QU ALITY CONTROL APPROVAL iato. *E3 or acnc *Ecu ets oC Ce s%vcL VES 'ESTING CR V A r% TE%A %CE ON S AFETY MELA TED EQV:PYE% T)
't . .
APPR*VALS rwAN I M ANAukVLN I D I APF walt PLANI YANAukVtNi sI A*p thu wait AtSPCN$.8LE FOR PERSON C ATE PROCE0 vat AUTHORi2ER CATE PC AC VEET.Na Nwvo tR CATE , Lt T EN;t D LAPtR A TiCN RESPONS 861 FGR PER$CN Daft DATE PC #; YLETiNG N.Y8 t m DATE (> T EN;E D EA?.R A!iGN Af E NS861FLEELR5CN CAf t
^ O A TE
~
\ j PCRC YEETiNG N.Y8tR CATE
~/
a s
- cN;;&D LaPi A A T.GN PESPONS 6st FGR FtR50N CAft 0 A TI PCR O ME ETiN 3 N.Y t tR DATE l 8e-I 372 30 3M5 AIT1ATOR.FCRW AR? 08 " NAL TO PC80 CList ATTACH CC81 TO PROtt;wa t St NG ?(aATED OTakR 00P t$ FCR .5E A5 N8'8' U R-
_~
a' ;
' f, - pyyllc 'FO R ST. VRAiN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ,g yq Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO N 7~/ b i PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE / d OF !b PROCE OL at NO IS$ul NO. liTLE f r~ z / 76 ~ /
, ^2h00 ' CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO RE_ASON FOR CHANGE sg6 A JO VL.
Ic,ls,3.14. I su c w L'ff /F 'l 7m?r C HTdeY M 93]M'- / t'<' o s f a ,e y
///fr$fgad o M & ("C r ' %
/d it
- 7 '/ k f d & J) o 7 604 ll / .E> A l. /c ea 7"f 7 6 d o 3 - 7$ 7'C
. 4 r .I-/o.
hff. 3.17 vrh O' SV - WJif y B Y . - ["l/* N Ch f( V~$/0) fV'?IOb, A"O Pc y v Jos- .
l5.1.2& V(Et f 'l ($ '/ o e e 0ff d [E 0C/11 Yf f((/ '/
vfro t y L. o r H e - e Il/f, f , 6" V h? ' f'l iU*TH*** y . .* ,* c & / / nC & /. e p r; A > > e * > $ , y O&fM
- pap u. z p c g ; A rpc
.f?vt f r vs: - f ? !s. ] &,
- t~a r.
INiii A T C A p/ h g f1 fg c; g / As CATE C T15 C NO IS PmOCEDURE PCRC APPROvtD7 CEVIATION CATEGORY: C T[VPOR ARY is NGLE USE
- LCNG TERY ttvPon Amy . ExPiets 2 YES C NO IS to mlvitw REOUiRE07 2 PtavAsggy.DCCF ATTACHED C Yt$ C NO IS OC REvitW 8ECutRED? C OOR 00R ATTACHED APPROVEO/ PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
<supean SCR $ SiGNATLRO (DA?ti
~CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL anEcu:nEa rce Att vAtyTEyAyCE nESULTS. TECWCAL SPECi!!CATC%kshEuA%CE A%D ,
ACMMSTMATWE PRO QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL
,nEcuinfo tr acer nEcu.nEs oC ca rwcLL ES TES Ti%G CR VA r%TE% A %CE C% $AFETv nELA TED EQuvPVE% T)
APPRe A ir 1 ruN MANAutMtNTsiAFF >>v unt, t l ruNi MANAvtMtNi sI AAF LAlk
*ESPONS BLE FCM PER$CN DATE PAOCEDLAE AVTHvAt2ER CATE PO AC M& ETiNG NLM6tR QAit LAf tNCED EAPi A Af TON #ESPGNS.8LE FC4 Pt A5GN l 0Af t DATE l*
PO AC YEET!NG NLYBER CATE L A T E N;,E D LAP,a A T.CN AL58CNS 6LE FCA Ft A5CN CAf t p DATE PG A C VitT6NG NLY814 ~CATE sj ALS&ONS.6LE FC A PL ASGN ' C ATE la tiNCtQ LAP A AT.CN CATE PC A C MEETING NLM8 tm Daft 6 813'2 3>3385 INrflAing.pCma Am0 CaiG AAL TO PCaC Citat ATTACM CCPv T3 peoCgpLag at NG Of vAtt0 Otatm CCP(5 504 VSE AS Nt;tSSA*
e e' 'o lI w.
' * ' e, . .. c . .
'~ 0 FORT;ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION r.< - Pubile m NO.
2 ~/p # .. Service: PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I/ OF b PROCEDVRE NQ ISSUE NO. TITLE f r . 2 / 74 -)
@[To# CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE src n de sc S' ' N' l N5W f {ll! O U $ f (L $ ( FM / T~ 74 7 h
(I fe4,(o yt Y o r's B 't / o f A L Ufi'I!~'l 64 o.
.. . r v -2 2 c&, yv-??ct. Ae' f Att Pcy-52I'l-R frv- Vo ic y c e rn.
52cl h a) ky-tr 3 e Y b'E' Att F it a s/ c t' f M . ~ (2/S,4.7 fe; , 7, c u t ees E p e, .s o , i e n coc A t c :* f f ? vf A S *** C 6Stlv f A$ ... fIV-22c2 A e ,) l-I V ~ 2 2 C 2. tAuO Qcy-S?t.,'-j y1 r 9 Y f d i V 'l . . . S 'l N fm. V () e r '/ . , , s.j s 11m, up ..j 14 .,. m-z?s + ... nv-n%
,~
Fly .:7c2 A~C tv-5 : I 'I ' 3 . H U <' 2 c l A!L li tt ft M t if ' na, r'tt 7 i t '/ . fl CJrJ c'rn // I(fi '/ , iNiT. Af aa OATL f C vt$ C NO IS Ph0Cf 0LmE PCaC APPaosto? CE' tATION CATEGCRY: C TEVPOR ARY iSiNGLE USir C LCNG TERV TEMPCA Amy DPtRES l 2 Yt1 C NO IS EQ hivfW mt0V+Af 07 C PgaVANENT DCCF ATTACMED C NES C NO IS OC REvfW REOU RED? C COR CCR ATTACMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ISUPtRVISOR S SIGN ATLREI (C ATEi CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL
,nE:. nEo sca Att uA %rE%A%CE nEsutTs TECH %' cat sPECic CATION SunVEuA%CE. A%D ACM:%rSTnAth E Pn0CEDunEso DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
,ntau nEoie wcag nEcu nts CCte swon ES TESTI%G on MA %TE*:A %CE CN SAFETY nELA TED EQu!! VENTI APPR
- VALS
/
rwANI VAN AvtytN T al AFF valt PL.AN T M AN AutytN I S T AFF >>v LAlt RESPONS 8LE FOR FEASON DATE PROCEOumi AUTHCR ZER 'CATE PCRC MEET.N3 Nvv8tR 'CAft ! E C E NCt3 EAP. A A T.CN AESPCNSiett EC9 PERSON QAit CATE , DCm c VEETiNG NLVSER CATE I laitNC40(AP AAT CN pt5FONSBLtFCArtA5CN QATE
,--s DAT{
PC A O VtET.NG NwYSER DATE v (%IkNCkh l AP AAIeON AthECNSSwtfCAfiA3ON j DATE CATE I PCR C VEETlNG NLV8 E R CATE 8vm 5 ' 3?: 30 3385 48sITIATOR f C A A Aa0 CB 3 NAL TO PCaC C,(mE AN AC.e CC#V 70 PROClOLSE $i NJ C(V UED OT*Em7CP ES FCa .5415
J' ll '
, '.g . 'l s. s ~ .\4 t- i .~
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION e/ U C Poa No. p 7 ' / g 2 Service PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ( PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE- / 2- OF M PmoctcymE NO l ISSUL NO. TITLE F 7s ? / 74 s / l pfNYo' l CH ANGED FRCM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE U f 'f.t!*.! UfLU U f f I F 'l TH A V Ca s: w T- SFE i480Vd-c,2 - 9 s s s s - 1 Cl O ld 8 '{ CCM7lMl t1yy T L= S f A Cd OS S TffnsasuA l- 1)c I u Tj g a <fod 77,7? nr 3 10 . P U'dOr 19 f.4.IT U U t r V . . p y trc{,/ uF?IF V ~* (c u-52 c n t v () . ix v 5 3 07. y t h F 't 6 'I ("AL 0 P L t TE t.7lS. .t . 2 6 , .. n/r. 4, .n ,v f w wws fau m a r r.sk 7. ny, g. n % nuc r e c. F.:A A r TE C4 7 CATE
- iN. T.A T C 4 C VES C NO IS Pa0CEDLRE PCac APPaovtD7 D EVI ATION C ATEGOR Y. C TEVPO*Amv is.NGtt usti I C LCNG TERV TEMPORamy EXPimt$
2 Vis C NO 8S EC AEvifW 8f 0V'AfD) C Pf RVAN(NT OCCF ATTACHEO _, l C vt3 3 NO 15 OC Riv!EW mgav4ptD) C CCR COR ATTACMED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED 15UPEnv50A $ SIG%ATLma , ICATEI CATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL iME:v.REO fcR stt vasTE% A%CE RESulTS TECH YCAL SPE::riCA T:0N SLRVEILLA%CE. A%D ACMNSTR A TS E PRCCE:. Rest _ OATL
, QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL r RECu'*ED IE WOPK REQutRE$ CC CR AV0n ES TES T1%G CR UA:\TE'. A %CE 0% $ATETY RELA TED EQu: Pvt % TI APPROVALS Gals M NTvaNautytNrdiAf>.>my ,A;g rLANI MANAutvtN T di AFF atSPCNS BLE FCA PERSON D ATE Pm0CE;Let AyTMCR12Em CATE PC AC VE6T,NG Nwv868 - carg s, ,
LAT ENCED LAP lH AT CN 96580N5 86E FG4 PERSON lCatt DATI s l PCaC VIET NG N.V819 CATE E a ? ENCLD L AG A A T.CN ALSFCNS act FC4 PL A50% O A!E g% CAT [
' PC AC Vi(T.NG N, veer CAfg Y
6A?iNCtO tap A AT.CN AliFCNS 86E ECa PLE5CN ;4?( Daft PCl* C MEET NG NLV8Em j04Yt
. l Nm F 37 33 ras ifefTlATQ4.FC# % Aa3 ra G Nat 70 s;e; ;tges t A Q n copy 0 paccg?,af 8( No CI'WATEC 0?ala CC' t$ 8C# tSt A5 NECESSA8 t
s w.
* / .,o .
ca. .
- g. I A,, s og O> - pyhllg FORT'ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GEdERATING STATION ,yq Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 87-/627 PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE / OF-FROC10VRtNC 155VE NO.
FT-?/7to~f TITLE f 7' Fo A C,0 2 / 7/* i l'to sd 8d>'2f6 p$k[To( CH ANGED FROM CH ANGE D TO REASON FOR CHANGE
$lf, f, / / A> f ty //f t'4 / /3 * ? Z o3 70 t/Al v fS /JV -??c f CMS 6 i4D 71 o,o , pp n 47 /=~ y . z e $-
7 /0 o t c. xi c 7-~ J'/'I'I,2. // Sc r- fc - 2?c.s ro - hf
- C)$ C4 %,5 3 O 7e ouriu7~ 70 giaDzS 81e u e'- //S- z? o3 rc <XCod- /'f C'** r*
g, 7, i9, 3 ii
/// 0,0 6 AD 6 70 o$g ,o i<?c 1
- r i e n
/ AJ Td A2 t'o l 4 $ '
S l.10. ( // S E 7" /=C - ??b y' yc 7/// s* " 'G o f " C f* f o e 'Pb o u rA r '
/HttC/~ 84 7- c f t e tJ k
/A) C& f8_ % e
, ,4,e' r /Jt -22 ej f
? ,e ti -// e s- 7c. /s'-of:
7,*p//f N ff NW fff If d. 7?//' /K'E^>T' 6/= 7/Jd If.[r , iNIIIA / LAlt
/)
3-27-9 7
, DK M . ! M /2 L e e"vt$
d C NO , l$ PROCIOURE PORC APPapstD? OEVIATION CATEGORY: MEMPOR ARY (SINGLE U$t) g vt$ C No ' 1510 REVIEW REQUlmt0? C LONG TERM TEMPORARY . DP194$ C PERMANENT 0CCF ATTACHED AES C NO IS CC RivifW Rt0VtRED7 C 00R 00R ATTACHip APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED / 7 lyn < 7-~J. //r Id a 4 t 7 .5*- 2 7- f / e , <suP RvisoR s sicNATuRai icAtE, EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL < "'- s intcu,sto rca stt usiyrtuyct ntsutts it:wcAl spec;rocAnoNsunvt:LLA%ct. A%0 AcM:wsinsnytreoctountso - OAft OUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL ' /D -- g
- ! e' /
/' ^'
nicv.ato rr aca r ntouents oc on t% vokts rts riya os us1% rt%s yct oy sartTY ntLA rta tautPetyn '4 t < ~
- 7 APPR*VA e etAN MANAGivtN r 5 AFF 5Ro j. -e cAtt rsNi vaNAutvtNT ST AFF cAit l C ^). w M ,s"< 3.Z /A-(n,,cy 3' - 2 7 -[/ C *) Z R ,,a_t! du ,5, ,t, W-2/-d7' cst 5 PONS SLE 709 PERSON DATI 4.AOCEDURE A4tTMCR2tR -f- CAtt D. Y/g 5.0, Nc(Ja,gf 5
- d / -[l b 3 ,( ; , s [ $s s c og 5 .?[$f
'c4TE p c. # PORC MitTiNG Ni.,ve tR e ut(N;tQ LAptR ATiCN R45P07-5 8L1FCRPERSON CAII OATE.
PC R C VitilNG NLYtt4 QAft LA t k N; t 0 LA F. A A T iG N RtS*CN5 Bst FCR *tR50N CAtt
& C ATE PCRC Mitt AG NuvatR OAft m
DisN;t; LAP R AT.CN RESPGN5 8tt FOR FIRSON Daft CATE PCR C Vt fT6NG NLM S ER CATE F:- 8' 372 313355 iMTIATOR 50R % ARD CR>G NAL TO PCRC CLERE ATTACM CCPI TO PROCECv a t Bl=NG Cf.1ATID CTaim COP ts FOR v54 A5 Nt;tS5'h
' sr.
T. 0 ) i \
. I
# o8' / *.
', . . 1 FORT'ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION I w C' P00 NO. I
$grylygt PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO N - /$ 2 7 I PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE E OF P R NQ 135yE NO. T4TLE M1.N0g N . CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE i
fl5,2 . /9, / a v6w /P e r& NS-/?e3 7 c. Srd. ,416 d. / 6 0.Sd. rbk r st <> . SE 7 FC -//r$~ To 5'19' c Nfl0 C90 6 u 7 A< N N4:tu
/pe LL //J - / ? ?]
g' ', ' pp' y Tc gjg p su,m ~
.fd 7 FC - /} C3~ TO S. 2.11.*{ pcPo e<< T h* C ,
*Ne t. A T OR DAI(
C DES C No is PROCEDURE PORC APPRCsto? DEVIATION CATEGCRY; C T[MPOR ARY 15tNGLt USEl C YE5 C No f$ f 0 Riv.fw R(OV:Ago? C LCNG TERM TIMPCR ARY . DPings C YES C N0 IS OC REVIEW 'tGVtR(Q) C PERMANENT.OCCF ATTACMED C ODR .00R ATTACMEO APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED __., 15LPERviSOR 5 SiGNATUREI (DATEi CATE ! EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL l setz stO F0n ALL MahTEN A%CE. ntSulTS. TECHNICAL SPECi!!CA T10% SunVE!LLANCE. AND AChlNisTMA TS E Pn0CEDVnts) CAft QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL _ int:c ata ir wone ntou;nts oc on twolvis itsisa on vAsTCys %CE CN sstrTY ntta tto rou:PvtyT i PPR*VA 5 rJNi YANaukYtNI b f APF DATL F LAN MANAbkVtNI bi AAF + 5h) QAli RESPONS SLIFOR P(RSON CATE PROCEDLRi AUTMCRl2ER DATE PORC MitTAG NwM8tR CATE i La T ENOLD E.tPiR A T ON RESPONS 6Li FQR PERSON CATE t DATE PCMC VitTiNG wMetR cAfg I sa'i % EQ tte RAT.GN ALSP;NS 4LiFCA PERSUN CAtt m OA?t N
) PCa C M(gT;NG NyvetR CAft (sitNOto bP RAfiCN RESPCN$ SL{ FCR P[RSON C A!!
CATE PORC MtETING NLY8im Daft Fr 5i 37 30-1;85 6sem4704.FCR A ARD CatC UL TO PCRC CLERO ATTACM COPY TO PROCEDLRt et NG C(Y!AT[D QTM(R CCP ($ FOR 1.$( &$ ?.(;[$$A6
~
ssr.&
, e i*.
- b*. l
' 'B ' FORT' ST, VRAIN hUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
- Public PC. ~0.
f' ,f.2 7 SerVlCO FusuC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO [( 7 PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE- 8 OF Y PROCEDUmiNO. I ISSLE NO. T6TL1 F Y- // 74.= l l MEyo/ CHANGEDFROM l CH ANGE D TO REASON FOR CHANGE N8w txo t'd /6-Z20Y ;rc W1' t'2 5 //0 - z z. o q lol.S'3 /9. I cr ass. se n t a n. &O f u - 2 2. c6 to u t. D e 7-h f = C f t? As h4k b $* l $ e 2. F6-?2td 7 t, N 64) Str~ m
.T~o M L7~$ WA C4 6R r/R J~~ idacr~ ,4t e n d D u x TO / 'N /J 7F C 7~ .
iNiTi A 7 0 A CAft 2 vtS C NO IS PROCEDumE PomC APPROSEDP CEVtATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY 45:NGLE U$ti C vis C NO l$ 10 #fv'tw AECvi8tDP C LONG TERM TEMPCAARY EXP)RES C vt5 C NC t$ CC REVIEW #8OutREDP C PimMANENT OCCF ATTACN1D C 00R 00R ATTACMID APPROVED /PAOCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
'5LPEmyt$0m $ SIGN ATUREI 10 A T E l LATE i
EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL 1 sMEQu *EO FDM ALL MA ATE % AACE. MESul TS. TECHMOAL SPEC: FICA DON SUMb ElLL.A%CE. ANJ ACM!MSTMA fre19MOCEOCMES) QATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
,ME0; *EO 19 ACR K MEQU:nES QC OM AYOLVES TESDNG On MA:% TE% A NCE 04 $AFETY MEL.A TEO EQU19VENh r LA N : M AN AvtMkNi 6 T AFF Daft r 6.A N MANAutMLNi 5T A66 pu QAft At$ PONS 8Lt FOR PERSON Daft PROCEDL'E AUTMOR2ER CATE
^
PC A C Miti.NG NLM8 tm cATE Ltit N;t0 lap' A AT,0% Pt%PCN5BitFORPtR50N CATE DATE POR C ME ET.NG NLve te CATE L A ? tNC E D La P. A AllON ~ a(SPGN5 $gt f GA PER$QN QATl p DATE
~
PORC VifT.NG NLMete CAft LAl t N;ta tAha A T,CN g atSPCNS 6.4 FCA PL ASGN ~ cATE CATE PCa C ME ETtNG NLM5 tm OATE l l 8 e 8 ' 3'2 M D85 INrT1ATOR.8Ca A Aa0 084N AL TO PCaC CLint AT'A M CCPY 70 PaoCg; Lag si N3 Cn;Afgp cTugn CCPil FC4 LSI 45 NECI55&a-
=
v
< o
,2 a p*
' /' ,. i 'l
'* f < pyhllg FORT S" VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION , , , , ,
p SerVICge PUBlic SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO [7-/527 FROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 4 OF PROC (QLRt NO. IS$UE NO. TITLE f Ys ?/76s f M %' CH ANGED FROM CHANGE 0TO REASON FOR CPANGE
/5/r./. /1. t ,ve w hec d.s-zze 1 70 ss t ,cg g , 3
& o.ra pen 7 w,o.
f.4.I'1.2. Ndw SJT PC-2704 'T o C Pc d4 7 AuT. l (Qfgy /// 0 l'd- ll$'N0 Y
- f. d.19. 3 To 6A6N
/4 A /7 /0 A .
Si 7* t'T E N O S'
- f. h. ll.h eu s,w 70 /$t' ?c duYA*[
.Ni!ATCm DATE 2 Yt3 2 NO IS P40CEDURE PORC APPaost;? DEV1AT10N C ATEGORY: C YE'8PCm APY is!NGLE U$ti C LONG TimV TEVPOR Amy . EX*'mES vi5 C NO IS EQ mEv:tw atovimED) 2 V($ 2 No is OC AlviEW mtQvist0? C PtmMANEN1 OCCF ATTACHfD C CDR ODR LTTACMt0 APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED __
($UPimVl$Cm $ $1GN ATUR El , IDATE1
). CATE LQ REVIEWER APPROVAL unE3;mED FOM ALL MathTE% A%CE MESulTS TECWCAL SPEC.f)CADON SUMh E'LLANCE. A%O ACVMSTRA DL E PnOCEcusts)
DATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL / ; inECwelo re scar nEcuinE5 0C on twolvES TESD%G OM MA %TE% A%CE C4 5 A EMY MELA TEO EOLUME%n .
. . APPR*VALS .
PLAN T MANAvtMtNT sT app LAli Pb.AN T Mt reAutMLN STA>6.hmV VAtt AESPCNS SLE FCm PERSON CATE PROCE0vatAUTMomlim DATE PGRC MtET.NG NvM6tm QAT( EmitN;ta gap a AricN atsPCNS ggg pcm PgmSON CATE , i OATE PCaC VitT NG NLV8Em CAft LA? f NLt Q tAF
- AT +CN AESECNiht FCm 6(mSCN CATE
- r. '
CATE i
\ ' PCm ; vlif.NG Nvvelm DATi La tin;&D LAP m AT,0N misPCN5At FCa f tasCN j CATE Daft i PCR C VitTiN 3 NLVelm Daft 8"- 8 JT2 M Ds5 (MTIATOR.FCaw Apo Ci G N AL TO PCRC CLE8E ATTA;M CCPY TO pagCEOLat at NG O(SuitD OTmt9 CCPil FCm LSE A5 NECES5am'
o 1: . . .s a .
' ,$ 4 i FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ,, gg SOfVICO: PusuC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 8 7 - /62)
,( , PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE / OF f y,95.'*y*) *fg . i l'"~* l "' G3 / /t 'c w h A UJ XCds _ c n .:/ 7C _ E (- u M6
@N0y0 / CHANGE 0FROM CHANGED TO RE ASON FOR CH ANGE 3l,tYo t c ,*fs W4i C a Y% ec : $E hisaw<<JG //t/ .22 f ;I su'dJ A..-.-c (4 < <.: e a cc) n c ?? " /u ~' C r ~ ~
- Y na A .co n .a rc. < a < <
ha r. i. Y -rc i rJ 1m 4.s / A e, ,, ,cu ,,, . u ,, ,, , a
- we Jz .ca J .n r - a r. . ~ n, , , n . , , , , , , , . , , < in.
c ,,- > c A- 9 I 55 f .h c <' - o ,:g , .h c .y 1,.i. s rsxc , 93 3 ,M, a..? X c A . VJ.1 t i,' .ycn e c, a c n e<c 4Au 4J e~ i e L 4 *Y g(, g g(, c c j ';7"a 6 2,*/ V J / C *4
- O '
.s c v.s 4 f r a v s
- s' J f 7"; a a 14 a Y,=// / v' *!6*( ** +o L a ///- 2 2 5 3 o -22Y/'
fyJ f f.I s) ;c J / ~f',V 6 $4 SUE a s6' 22 : l, /*'- 2 2 't 3, H v.;2at, //v,2: u.5, e s . c .a r r e y o ., viii wasse
/ ' I) L) h, fl V > $ A l$, L/ Y (*//s*C n is e , " .e st /tJJC t YC J- 52/Y-/ 4.s c e,;, , ri a y m-
/C V - b 2 / >' * ,],
/ ( J ,"'( ( f /
- i d o ~ r'.se r/ i., u W T.AT;R OAft C3 6
>C vi5 C N7~'"TF1ll0CEDust FcaC Anst.c"ltp OE'v1 AT10N CATEGOR Y: %/
3 .2 7 / / TtvPCA A4v iS AGil v5tl LONG TERM f tVPCm Any . ttp-sts X 4t$ C NMS EO RivtW 8tORRE05 p% 4 t $ 0 NO t$ QC RE'vlEW #E0VtRE D) Q PERVANtN* OCCF ATTACht0 APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED
- C M -- f(C "
( j ( . isL'PERv1SO4 5 $haf t.ati 3
- 2 T ?7 ICATE: ~
EQ REVIEW [R APPROVAL Y I
! s
,atCJRED 504 ALL MAsTE% A%CE RESILTS. TEChMCAL $9[C.h CAT:CN $UMaEuA%CE. A%D ADV VSTMATivt!*CCEDGRE51 I * ?f cait
',, g' d QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL '-' p g tattu *Ec oc acog ntcu nts cC Cn :WCL % ES TES TM CM VA:%TE% A %CECN SAFETY nELA TED EDV:P%'E%TI '
APPReVA E , l DANI YANAotvtN T a/ At* vaik n.,A N VANAututNI>IA** w.s , vatt , 8".- , hk / .*- 4 .. .* 'L 45POWidj FC4 M OATE PRJCEOLRt AVTHCEQt A v4TE (gam % )aSQ'g(M sVw p 2 'ZY- 77 .' . , r. ,D, 3 - J ' - f ** y PGaC (T AG % vee 4 cAit (tiEN;ED ttP.R AT GN 845PCN5 SLE K,9 Fl* 5CN CATE Ca?!
#;a; vitT AG %vste Cait L A'EN;t D iaP
- A T:0N *l55 A5ettFCA6tA5;N Catt
& CATE I, *j p;aC viti N3 %ve te ca?E w.
E A 'iN;iD taf. A AT.CN AtStuN$ 66E p;a stas;N ~CAtt D A't. Pon; utti N3 % vsta CAft s- , s . 3' L IB5 18vtT1A]Q4.pca A ang go.q N AL Tc Pca; Citan APACH COPY TO Pa0:!Dang gg Na cgpArg) o %En c;p($ 5C4 L SE 4 5 Nt.'t! 5 A a .
0
~
4',' y .. b- ., ;
,'e' s C FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION P00 m
$g[yjgge PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO _ 0 7- b2l
\ o
(, PROCEDURE DEVIATIOnl REPORT PAGE
- OF 7 PROCT 0LRt NO 155Vi NO. TITLt
/ 7'- 2 / 7 & /
O CH ANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGt WA I* f t A.t kle t r ec a /.v onccs ra... Ali n/ M ~ 9.1.554 .+ a
'b *~ ' d v.u s s ) //v'- 225 f /ty . ;s c W n sic n. , ;.g , g Src .* 5. /. V. /
22'll, l'V 2 22 7, PV * < ,g . 9 J 35 g , , , _ y,,c 2293*Hs-220t Hv-
/ rb*.40G/t. U V = ?. M f 22 d fV*2205,PCv- %, \\ }>e f.k1 q{
52/3 /c v- Sliy-t
' ',' "
- 5 zbc e%d of 4Le 4 ed-
'H C 'Y 'd A4 n.n Q t,q sv>' 4s All fat <Y 6c $.< 6 Med b
)/' l * -
, 4 4est yqY4er he ,
i/5. /* 5 /Yi h/< < r7 t u
- f/p ,, y , , , ,,, w
,m v c //v J2 5 <l'
//V - 22 4 /PV-i229,
/'V- 22 'l 3, Hy - 2 2 a fe I
~*
.N. T. A r;4 OAft 2 vt$ C NO is pa0Ct0 lee PCa0 APPaost07 DEY!AT CN CATEGORY: C ttVPCa ARY <5'NGtt ustl Z YtS C NO IS EQ *tsitW AICVf f D? C LCNG TimM YtVPC* Amy . turists 2 it$ C NO IS CC alvtN Rt0v atDP O PERVANENT.0CCF ATTACeto C 004 00R ATTACNt0 APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED _ . _. -
15LPE R vt50m 5 SIGN ATLati 10Atti LATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL . _ __ set:;ntoroestt uset%s%:t ats '. rt: west ser:;r:cwor senyt:ttssct s%o stv%istnam t enottounts> .
~
,q St QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL. ,,,
at::sta ts acanc er: wars cc cn orvot y $11%aonussrt%s%:E c% sartry ntes tgo towevt%n APPftOVALS
- rJNI Y ANAutMtNi bi APF Lait rJNI Y ANAw&YtNI bI APF e*Y walt a[$PON$ 3L( FOA PttiON CAft PRQC(Oy At AyTwCai;ge OAfg PC A; witT.NG NLY6t% OA't
~
L4f tN;t0 (AP A AT CN stSPONS BLE FGa Pim$0N QAfg 04?! PC m; VtET.N3 NL4 8 tm lCAft l
~
(*t: toto Ar.cN *is>;N> ect scotas;N cAtt s-=. DA't v
) Pca; vitTiNG N vstm O ATE kE kNwkh k A kk thN kh I h4k f kh OA't PCa: vgttiscNyysts cA*t
'e+ 8 7': V 30t$ tesmA10a .pOR,% A AD CA $ NA( TQ PC AO C(gen ATTA;g (CPy 73 p40;[;,,% gg Ng Og, Aigg QTmga (q,' g3 p; A ,$g A$ s,Ng$$ Ae.
/
( ,.
/S, ' .
i
, :s , y o5, N Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SerVICee PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ;,gg l gg,87 ' hl PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 3 OF 7 I ISSUE NO. TITLE PJOJEDURE NO.
21 .2 / 7 6 - / l CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE P . O Afl5. lo 5 (_,p llv - 22 0$ P V .2 2 b 5 na m ,, c ~ . ~ 9/S. /. 6 /h klureca " p;.. ,,,,, .,,.n , ,
//J-22 53 Mv. 22 'f t
/
s* r'V-2229/ f V .2 2 'l 3s'
.. //V -220> / /// - 22s3<
i l
/V- 22 s $ A<E m~
>assy O /c a, h* l* l YJ $Y t/ f f( o f( < p ,: y , , , gg , j g ,;
/a ur : //v - 22 4/ //
lU - 2 2 2- 9, PV - 22 V3, N J- 2 2 o 3, IV - 2 2 0.5 ,
.Ni T1 A T O R DATE
- YES 2 NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APPROVEo? DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE)
- Z YES C NO IS EQ REVIEW REQUIRED? O LONG TERM TEVPCRARY EXPIRES C YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REOVIRED1 C PERVANENT 0CCF ATTACHED C ODR.COR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED __
(SUPERvlSOR S SIGNATUREI IDATE) QATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL IRECuiMED FOR ALL MAINTENA A CE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECiflCA TICN SURVEILLANCE. AND AD%NISTRA T!vt PROCiCURES) CATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL IREQU!*ED IF WORK REQUIRES QC CR INVOL VES TES TING CR MAINTENANCE C4 SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENTI APPReVALS PLAN T MANAGEYkNT ST AFF CATE PL. ANT MANAGEVENT ST AFF . Sito QATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEOURE AUTHOR!ZER CATE PCRC WiETING NUMBER DATE , EATENDED EAP1R AT.ON RESPONS!8LE FOR PERSON CATE DATE. PCRC MEETING NVV8 ER CATE LA T ENCEO EAP;RA T4GN RESPONS.8LE FOR PERSON OATE PORC YEETING Nsv8ER CATE v EAT ENCEO EAPiR ATeo% RESPONS,8LE FOR PERSON QATE DATE: POR C YEETING NLM BER DATE Form 4# 372 30-US5 INmATOR.FCRWARC CR:G,NAl, TO PCRC CLEAK ATTACH CCPY TO PROCEOURE BE.NG CEviATED. OTHER CCP ES FCR USE AS NFCESSAn
e , rY <
' [ a', ' ' M . p 7 ,
4 ..i... FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 5 C PoR NO.
.- SOTVlCgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 8 7- }$1\
] PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE Y OF f PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE
/Y- 2/ M - l RN CHANGED FROM CHANG ED TO REASON FOR CH ANGE 5/S. I /7. 2 gn Jrcs " h isy n/a r cw a c r CR- 9335A -2 n Win fy xt Atu a u G A 4 C o< Os Co n fn y / 7p' s?csiO11 1c 4 4 i n 4i f a / <J fl Yd/.2d2-30,Sl M Z- / o . "
f/5./ 2 3 //., Wwn a "%<in exan odHx va n on r"H A 7 b'.swc1 // v - 2 2 5 E,
//.t 2 2 y t, j'v- 22 2 9 a AaC N#22 4 5 -$ s S.
sW( 4E( UE C C a *tfl G fC s 7, INiTLA T OR DATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 0? DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY IS;NGLEUSEI C YES C NO IS EQ REVIEW REQUIRED? C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY EXPIRES C YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REOUIRE0? C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHE 0 C OCR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATUREI IDATEI DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL IREQUIRED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMIN!STRA DVE PROCEDURESI OATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAi. t RECUiRED IF %CRK REQUIRES QC 0;IwCLVES TES DNG OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQutPMENT) APPR e VALS PLAN T MANAGEMENT ST AFF OATE PLANT MANAGEMEN T 5TAFF SRO DAit i RESPONS 8LE FOR PERSON CATE PROCEDURE AUTHORtZER 0. TE 1 PORC MEETING NUMBER QATE EXTENOED EAPtR ATiON R ESPONS:8LE FOR PER SON DATE DATE. PORC MEETING NUYBER DATE EATEN 0E0 LAPiRATION RESPON5 ISLE FOR PERSON QATE DATE: PORC MEETING NUV 8ER OATE EAT ENOEQ EAP1 RATION R5.SPONSiBLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE: POAC MEETING NUMBER DATE l r s*m e C30 3385 INITIATOR.FC' WARD ORtG;NAL TO PCRC CLEP(, ATTACH COPY TO PROCECumE dEiNG CEVIATED- OTHER CCP E$ FOR USE A$ NECESSARi
o y r <, / 4 ,i
- ~ , r- i s .. w 4, ' o 8e . .
pyhllc FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION pg, yo, ,,
$gryl Cgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 8 7 - /h 7-l j.' PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I OF f PROCEDURE NO. t ISSUE NO. TITLE fr- 2/ 76 -/ l fiHTo' CHANGED FROM CH ANGED TO REASON FOR CH ANGE 5/5./. 23. I /Jc w .510" /f'<,g y pa , c we ,
CA-l$$$A-2 /J C't 3 Sc o /y /*f( A J u 4 r s G Caartau/fy A C d a// Y( *1 N /M eit6 j$ u / *JY.$ Yd /d 0 2. * $O, )) .1 f f- / s . C/An A>? lh nC ~ " 'Tc .. n < w ci
//t/-j)$$' NV-]2L//
- 5. 2 y h -222?s' P/-22v3s
// v- 22 0 r, // v- 2 2 0 3,
// = 22 G f ' l'C V* $}/
fc d- 52iv-/ n - c " s< s . s :19 - 2 . iNiilATCR DATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APPROVE 07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARf (SINGLE USE) C YES C NO IS EO REV1EW REQUJRE07 C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY - EXPtRES C YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRE 07 C PERMANENT-OCCF ATTACHED O 00R 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (DATEl (SUPERVISOR'S SIGN ATURE) OATE I EQ REVIEWER AFPROVAL tREQU: RED FOR A LL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRA TivE PROCEDURESI CATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL o'RECV: RED If %CRK REQUIRES CC OR INVOLVES TES TING OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENTI APPR
- VALS -
OATE PLAN T MANAGEMENT 5 T AFF . SRO DATE MN T %tANAGEMENT ST AFF CATE PROCEDURE AUTHOR 2ER OATE l l RESPCNS BLE FOR PERSON i
~
PORC MEETtNG NUMBER DATE RESPONSiSLE FOR PERSON CATE EATENCEO DPIRATION DATE. PCRC MEETING NUMBER DATE RESPONS;8LE FOR PERSON DATE EA T ENCEO EAPIR ATiON 6, DATE: PORC YEET NG NUMBER DATE V RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON CATE EAT ENCEO UPIRAT#ON DATE: PORC MEETING NUMB ER DATE Fv- F)372%I)85 INITIATOR fCRWARO ORIG;NAL TO PoaC CLERK. ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE SE!NG OEVIATED OTHER CCP'ES FCR USE A$ NECES$ARY
- ~ _A -
e "
,9- t .
t r.. u
<!, , , PubllC FORT ST. VRAb. l .. NUCLEAR GENkRdlNG ,,, STATION Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO [/- /92. l 5 7
( PROCEDURE NO. PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT ISSUE NO. TITLE PAGE OF f 1 .2 / 7 C -/
${,NO[ N CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE t/Ahre /h W rrC ~ "/- oActe -e. . . .
Ana Jrv em m nu- 2.zss, 525 //y- 2 2 V/, PV ,2 22 9,'
/'v- 22 'f 3- Mv .22 a t -
//v - 2 2 0 3/ f v- 22 0 5s PC L/- 5 2 / 3- P C V- 5 2/ '/-t-An0 fl V .$ z/ */-2.
/vsJt 4AL L? E $UM/
QMd o s'/S. 2. 5 A W1rca " % w ,...-r o e usiv u Ev- 22 5 3 //v-2 2 Y//
/
Pv'- 22 2 9s /@ - 22 Y3s
,//L/ -22 0 / //L/
- 2 2 0 5,
//-22O d e f *?s a. Os' 4, INITIATOR OATE C YES C NC IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROvio? DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE)
O LONG TERM TEMPORARY EXPIRES C YES C NO IS EO REVIEW REQUIRED? C PERMANENT.DCCF ATTACHED C YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIREO? C OCR OCR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATUREI (DATED OATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECuiREO FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESULTS. TECHNICAL SPECUICA DON SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMhtSTRA TivE PROCEDURESi DATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL IRECU$ED JF %CRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOLVES TES DNG CR MAIN TENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENTI APPR
- VALS DATE PLANT MANAGEMtNT ST AFF
- SRO QATE PANT MANA4EMEN! STAFF RESPONS.8LE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORGER DATE PORC MEETING NVY8 ER DATE EATENOED EAP1R ATiON RESPONS:8LE FOR PERSON QATE DATE.
PORC MEETING NUMSER DATE l EA T EN;ED UPtR AT4GN RESPONS 8LE FOR PERSON DATE m DATE. PORC MEETING NVMB ER CATE l ! , m EAT EN0E D EAP R A T iO N RESPONSiSLE FOR PERSON OATE DATE: PORC MEETING NVY8ER DATE F e m 0 772%~ 'A INIT1ATOR. FORWARD OR:GiNAL TO PORC CLERK. ATTACM COPY TQ PROC (OURE SE:NG CEV1ATED O!wtR CCP'ES FCa USE AS NEC
., / - , .:
' , us- ta l , . . .. a < .
b., i u rI FORT ST. BRAIN NUCLEAR , GENERATING STATION Puol'ic Poa NO.
$0rVlCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO [I[- /$ll (j PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT TITLE PAGE 7 OF I PR,0CEDURE NO. j ISSUE NO.
/ 7- 2/ 74 -/ ,
fMNNO CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE c/5. 2. g /h h /si m a b r. . ma muu
,//g 22 5.$ - h .22 Y /-
/4- 22 2 9, fo'- 2 2'/3-fy - 2 2 o f, // V - 2 2 03-h - 22 a 5 m E su
/** t L Y o/C4, 7/s. 2./ 7 4 Winca " n < , ,y . .. o , ,. _
- HV- 22 '// - N-2229, N - 22 4 3- //V - 22 o 3-h - 22 o s, "
7/C. 2. / 7, ) /t}c ~ Jtcp e/i
/Cwr not c. an ,
CN - 93.3 5 8 - 2. / J OScu dy n(n a s t u g INiTiATGA DATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PURC APPROVE 07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE) C YES C NO 15 EQ REV1EW REOUIRE0? C LONG TERM TEMPORARY . EXP:RES C YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRE 0? C PE.?*ANENT DCCF ATTACHED C 00R t.n.,A ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE) 10 ATE
~
DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECu! RED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESULTS. TECHMCAL SPECF)CA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMWISTRA TIVE PROCEDURES) CATE , QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL 1RECu! RED IF WOR K REQUIRES QC CR INVOL VES TES TING OR MAIN TE %A NCE ON SA FETY RELA Tc0 EQUtPMEN T) APPReV LS DATE PLANT MANAGEVENT ST AFF .SRO GATE FLANT VANAGEMENT STAFF { RESPONS:BLE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER DATE I PORC MEETING NUVSER QATE EATENDEO ExPIRATiCN RESPONS'BLE FOR PERSON OATE ' .l I DATE. POR C MEETING NUV SER DATE RESPCNSiSLE FCR PERSON DATE EATiNCEQ EAPiR AT.ON e OATE. I PORC MEETING NUYBER OATE w/ RE$PONSi8LE FOR PERSCN DATE EA T ENDED EAPiR ATiON DATE. PORC MEETING NUVSER DATE Form it 172 30 3385 INITIATOR.FORVv ARD CR G-N AL TO PCRC cleat ATTACH CCN TO PROCEDURE SE:NG DEVIATED OTHER CCP ES FCR USE A'J N
. *i ,
- #'J f' pg lfg FOR Sh.VRAI LEAR'GERIRAtthG STATION ,, go,
/ Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO [/- /h'2 i
,v PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE [ OF PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE ff-2/76-/ kNO[ CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CH ANGE S. 2. /?. / - G o a. '.> - / A c o< _g; conr/auary At c ti O /J 7'C4 + /N 4 s i % a -r.t 78/.202-11,3.2 4 -r f- / O ,
$$*
- 2 $ /b St/rireca "j/c w y . . . -nu r y,u a u Nt/ 2 2 5 2, h'v .2 2q h/.2229,.no h' -
2293 xa ,g c ac.ow
- c. ~n < ru y.
[/5. 2.21. / A/c w .lrt s "{/ca i; y -ras r c .n r.s c r C A'- 733S 8 -2 /r cs aJcc dy Mc .o a v ~ G C a .J + n u o *' y A c t s f/
;NiitATOR -
DATE 2 YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PCRC APRROvED7 DEV1ATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE) O LONG TEPM TEMPOR ARY . EXP1RES 2 TES O NO iS EO REVIEW RECUtREO7 ' O PERMANENT DCCF ATTACHED 2 YES O NO IS QC REVIEW REQUIRE 07 O ODR COR ATTACHED - APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED '* 10 A TE) (SUPERVISOR'S SIGN ATURE) DATE 10 REVIEWER APPROVAL
- tRECV:REO FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND A0wNIST.1A TIVE PROCEDURESI OATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL tRECU RED !! WCRK REQUIRES OC CR INVOLVES TESTING CR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMEN TI
. APPReVALS QATE Pt. ANT MANAGEMEN STAFF SRO DATE ELAN T M AN AutMEN T S T AFF DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORt2ER DATE RESPCNS 8LE FOR FiRSON PORC MEETING NLMB ER DATE RESPCNS:8LE FOR PERSON DATE EATEN 0ED EAPIR ATICN DATE.
PCRC YEETING NLY8 ER CATE RESPCNSiBLE FOR PERSON DATE EA TEN 0ED EAP! A ATiCN
& OATE.
PORC VEETiNG NvV8ER CATE '
)
s EAT EN;ED EAPiRA T#ON RESPONS<8LE FOR PERSON CATE CATE. DATE PORC VEETING NUYSER F o~ 8 - )72 M 3385 INITIATOR.FCPWARD CR G.NAL TO PCR0 CLERC ATTACH CCPY TO PROCEDVRE SE;NG DEVIATED OTHER CC'ES FC4 U!E AS NECESSApv
, ? v / e p . . . ~ ac, .
H ..;,.,,. p # od ' pgl'lg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCCEAR 'GE ERNTiNG STATION pog yg,
,- $0rVlCOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF CO,LORADO N , b1l
' PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF
.,(
PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TIT 66 fr- 2/ 7K - / NNN CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE S/c.2.2 z. i ,
- c- a - ro ws z. /or 727- /2 0 2 3 f, 3 2 nr .
f -/0,
* *5 % bCU g, or yQ y ,
plw ed Hs-nu gn (bc ofE5 f a%Ik.% '
%d We3) b y .
h td kJ etd:. s ud
% VC oftm$
, 13I5 4 M wev g4 ig g 1.,
l*L o L - S o %d veriQ 4bT Mbe doses . l $ .M . M \tw kt%) h e, t k $% CP 54 13 , a~ It/ -_ DATE 4 nit LA T O R 7% dfA ' DEVIATION CATEGORY: %TEMPOR ARY ISINGLE USE) 3-27~-27 YES C NO IS PROMURE PORC APPR0do? YES C- NO ($ EO REVIEW REQUIRE 07 )/ O LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY . DP1RES Y YES C NO IS QC REVIEW REQUIRED? ')C fEJLMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C 004 00R ATTAjHED9
. 'e * *# +.;
APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ISUPERvlSOR'S SIGQTURE) / (DATE) SATE s g% b EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL
% IRECutREO FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESULTS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ACM:MSTRATIVE PROCEDURES) ee * , oATE ,
QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL U
- n REQUIREO IF %DRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOL VES TEST 1NG OR MAJNTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENT]
APPR e VALS , . g OATE PLANT MANAGEMEN T $TAFF SRO OATE PLA%: VANAGEMENT STAFF CATE PROCEDURE AUTHOR:2ER DATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE PORC MEET ANG NUMBER QATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON , EATENOED EAPtRAirON DATE-
.d .(
POR C VEETiNG NLY B ER QATE CATE EAT ENCEO EAPIRATiON RESPONS 8LE FOR PERSON e g DATE. ( ' DATE PORC VE ETiNG NLMB ER i
, oATE v m.c E o uPia A T,0N RESrONS.8LuCR PEaSON ,
l ' DATE:
- DATE PORC MEETING NUM8 ER f orm Fi 372 %3385 INTT1ATOR.* ONWARD CR.GtNAL TO POPC CLERK. ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE SEING DEVIATED. OTHER CO
- _ - _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ ..d _ _ . . .. _ ._ .A '#- - - - - m._. _ . _ _ _ . . . .
f pjgllg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION p g, ,,, SerVICOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO F7-/53d v . PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE l OF & m
.. f "S [E,,D 0,. I , l $ SUE NO. TIRE 7rd M gL C Dg Kp't c v , vn ( cc ME, O[ CH ANGED FROM - I CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE a, yk- )s v.%
+
kM e nC (= y ~ ~ l-IV-D n los dc - gy,, Ac3M zxg ' P ' velgeJ q kyJ d . c,
) C1) ltf.k O N e45 q( i ,,4 sh io53N 9}l '/to )'4" '
4" 4 "P m(.3 p . s V 4 < ' v"
- 2. A j o :f t $L R bl 5
,i i 1( T s, rd i e. w 01 e
y(Q . D { t'r ta t, 94 d b. N 4i% f , 3 V.,( A , )c ( Q - W4 A N OC E i ' "' " f *II #*' ' ed VCQ - 4W A gg O T ^( < S 5* f $lt WdN qg S/ EDi$ $ 'Oki j dbis V AlL( asd 9 ( 1,, td . .i n c T- vAes , d a .J -J cJ 4ty $( ,, p -
'0
', MV-71;4,4t'-21413 cim. 4 - % u, , ,, V 6 PV-21 u i fv-Itu 4, g , .s 5 n ,. p p Y V ' 1 1 J '. , M V~ ZLC M Y f
p \'-lQ C h , M /- Q?,N - ' f e Gu d .s ( CCdc.th ,W h(,\ ' - 510 I a, J R V-W5// K h y s C R. - 4 3 % A *e-&
% W' ky c A r&y
( R - 9 3 u n, s e :- a t s 0, I C C ny (., # I DATE iNmA TOR g
./ .N . l s , 5~ ? 5. C
- DEVIAT10'N CATEGORY: ,'S' TEMPORARY IS NGLE USE)
*FYES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROVED 7 O LONG TERM TEMPORARY - EXPtRES
.O YES C NO iS EO REY:EW REQUiREo? O PERMANENT DCCF ATTACHED X YES C NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRED?
OgR OCR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED(SUPERytSOR'S OI/%b SIGNATURE)
} N7
/i /L (O ATE)
EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL
/. /< )' v '
w L/ DATE
- ?~]
IREQUIRED FOR ALL MA WTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNIC /L SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND A DMINISTRA TIVE PROCEDURESI
'- ' I p QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL
' ' ' ^ * ' ' !?
IRECutREO IF %CRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOL VES TES TWG OR MAINTENANCE CN SATETY RELA TED EQUIPMtNTI CATE DATE PLANT MANAuEMEN STAFF PLANT MANAGEMENV ST AFFj $AO .
'!. Yl w. w pf DATE
' $' f .<. ! ,.o /~ /
OATE RESPONS!BLE f0R PERSON, , PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER ( {i
, . f' l . m h' fo? Y, , r. .
OATE a
* (, POR C MEETING NUMBER R ESPONSISLE FOR PERSON DATE UTENCED EXPiR ATION DATE.
PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE RESPCNSiBLE FOR PERSON DATE EAT E NDED EAPiRATiON
,,.-- DATE; PORC MEETING NVM8ER QATE L
RESPONSr8LE FOR PERSON DATE LATENDED EAP RATsON DATE: PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE For+ F t J7243335 INTT1ATOR.FCRMRD OR'G;NAL TO PORC CLERK. ATTACM COPY TO PROCEDURE BE:NG DEVIATED OTHER CCP E$ FOR USE AS NECESS AR*
~ _ _ . - _ _ - _ _ _ _ __ - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ,, gg,
- Services PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO E7 - '$ 7 'l PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE h#
A kN wh k keW jyc (s, ' 1 WI bC
-t L ,.
55iM J S 4 4Le c ., a i, C ,, c 6p d5 NY-2M4 gi y ts , 4 3
,.L
, g,
'b W/ P 41, fV - h '3 0 ; yi t) f f ,it .g hg PV nvl , AV-un 3 i A 4 ,f A Q
[V lNI , %'-M O L 3 q i A p. ](g lt,( , IU 5i 3 ; TV % ol ,g ,f,j w.5 P W -$%D5 % ,, b 01 b e. Yv lI y -p n, s'
$$5 b', 'v'ik4(m V
(/ , , { q,J 4 L -d v h:,4v-Ztgj, n 'J ' N 1 , t' V - 2 'm % . EU l '. e ) LIV N ;, U , ' i s 4 , 7 ' ',1 C L ofc s\\ _p, INI TIA T O R DATE C YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 0? DEVIATION CATEGORY: C TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE) C LONG TERM TEMPORARY UP1RES C YES C NO IS EO REVIEW REQUIREo? C PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C YES C NO IS OC REV1EW REQUIRED? C ODR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR'S S GNATURE) 40 ATE) DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECutRED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE, RESULTS. TECHNICAL SPEC:FICADON SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRATNE PROCEDURES) DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL tREQUIRED 4 WORK REQUIRES QC OR INVOL VES TESTING OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENTI APPReVALS OATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRO DATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER DATE RESPONSi8LE FOR PERSON PORC MEETlNG NUMBER DATE RESPONS18LE FOR PERSON DATE UT ENOED UPlR ATION DATE PORC VEETING NUMBER DATE RESPONSISLE FOR PERSON DATE U TENCEO UPIRATsON DATE. . PORC VEETING NUM8ER CATE DATE ty T ENCEO EAPlRATlON RESPONSi8LE FOR PERSON CATE: DATE PORC MEETING NUV8ER F v- v 86 372 %338S INITIATOR. FORWARD CRIC:NAL TO PORC CLERC ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE 8EiNG DEVIATED, OTHER CCP ES FOR USE AS NECESSAPv
9 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public pg, SerVlCOs PUBLIC SERVICR COMPANY OF CSLCRADO 87-'5W ( PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF O PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE
- k. NO(
i 53k A, u. I t ca N' ey d . . ild vdes 4v-nsq s uv. nc ,
@/-it u ,py-: yq ,
H v n .1 , P V - T i el rV-11 % e. / .- e, i l 5 ell y e g% , " a L/ q ;. i 7 A m.% My . . cheJ Ul . H v - nn , hy l '[ % .2 7 1 V -- 2 2 Y 4 )
^
yp.2134 ,;v. 2tou 1l $ b 7. . ty % ef he. - h .h 5,6kLLk c t - n % -2. s een h f 4%ei g l.,( 3 c al ow l y iNIT 6A T O R DATE C YES C NO lC PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEMPORARY (SINGLEUSE) C YES C NO IS EO REVIEW REQUIRED? O LONG TERM TEMPORARY - EXPIRES C YES C NO i3 0C RfVIEW RFOUIRE07 O PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C ODR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVI?OR'S SIGNATURE) (DATE) DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL 1REQU: RED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESULTS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRATIVEPROCEDURES) DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL (RECutREO IF ACRK REQUIRES QC CR INVOLVES TES TING CR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENT 1 APPR e VALS .~ PLAN T MANAGEMENT STAh QATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRO DATE RESPONSr8LE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER DATE PORC MEET 6NG NUMBER DATE EATENCEO EAP!R ATiON RESPONStBLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE: PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE EAT ENCEO EAPiRA TION RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON CATE DATE. 1 PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE l l l EATENCED EAPiRATION RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE CATE. PORC MEET 6NG NUM BER DATE Fom q F 6 372 3> 338S INfTIATOR. FORWARD CRIG.NAL TO PORC CLERK. ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE BE;NG DEV1ATED, OTHER COP:ES FCR U$t AS NECESSAR)
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PublIe PoR NO.
$9tVlCOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 87~ > $N PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE OF 4 PROCEDUR E NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE fA& nogg CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE SCccss 4snsil P*^4 7 3 %7, -3 4;"3t
,A. T- . . g, "
b** f% % t' <% .,; { , y3 ,4q p '. ': 3 W - 2 t q 2. , p' u se wj PV-1 tu d
! f f - {>t * * ) (a.MMg.
l t 7
} g $ 1 'y l h) < ~ $ ef m :.w M oC6a
'cy m e*, w ,' )~,I c d ,n A a .., s .
pa-h 3 2 b[-N, 1 lC, INITIATOR DATE O YES O NO l$ PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE) O YES O NO IS EG REVIEW REQUIRE 07 O LONG TERM TEMPORARY - DPIRES O YES O NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRED? O PERMANENT.DCCF ATTACHED O CDR 00R ATTACHED APPROVED /PROCEDijRE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE) (DATE) DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL (REQUIRED FOR ALL MAINTENAhCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA DON SURVEILLANCE. AhD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES) DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL tRECU: RED 19 %CRK REQUIRES QC CR I. WOLVES TESTING OR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENT) APPReVALS i PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF DATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRO DATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDURE AUTHORCER DATE PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE DTENDEO UPiRAT)ON R ESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE: POR C MEETING NUMBER DATE EATENDED Uf1RAf aON RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE: PORC MEETING NVMBER DATE EATENDED UPiRATION RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON OATE DATE: PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE F < - 0 372N3W INITIATOR 80RWARC ORIGINAL TO PORC CLERT. ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDVRE BEAG DEylATED OTHER CCP'E$ FOR USE As NE i$$AR.
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC peg go, OSOIVlCgs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 87- 43d PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 8 OF S
)
PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE RNOAo/ CHANGED FROM CHANG ED TO REASON FOR CHANGE 11 V .4 c As vi 4 % " %. d VM (- B V-usy i d v-ita l , 4 Ap g qq IV - 21'* J i rS' - Z "t.u d 3 A k - 71.R i W- 2 .$l , F \' 'L L O f e , NV Q m - 5, O '. '.' - I l o t al PCV us.' M. 3-N- t7 at i h gy.s As vA " V-M 7 M uh nt uu , sv-m t , T V - W ,o ,(t/- 2 t. % , 4V-11ul,Ht-11g4 i G V - W (, gre sil c fth , Y- % O {g ;, d v / , y A\
.L 'v . g q'- d'u'\\" S te . .1< 4 , n U -7 t9 L g 'N !
hy - 71' f/-1194 # 4, ; 1. E ; e V - l '. C b INIT1A T CR DATE O YES O NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 07 DEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE! O LONG TERM TEMPORARY - EXPIRES 0 YES O NO IS EO REVIEW REQUIREO? O PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED O YES O NO l$ OC REVIEW REQU'RE0? O 00R.00R ATTACHE 0 APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED _ (OATE) ISUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE) OATE EO REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECVIRED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPEClf!CA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRA TIVE PROCEDURESI DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL (RECutREO If %CRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOLVES TESTING OR MAINTENANCE CN SAfkTY RELA TED EQUIPMENTl APPR e VALS CATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRO UA TE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF R ESPONS;8LE FOR PERSON OATE PROCEDURE AUTHORLZER DATE i PORC MEET 6NG NLMBER DATE RESPONS181.E FOR PERSON DATE EATENDED EAP6 RATION DATE: PORC MEETING NUMB ER DATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON OATE LAT ENCED EAPIRATsON DATE: PORC MEETING NUM BER . DATE RESPONSt8LE FOR PERSON DATE EA T ENDED EAPiRATiON DATE: PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE For*
- Fj 372 N338S. LA;lTIATOR.FORW AR0_ ORIGIN AL TO PCRC CLERK ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE stiNO DEvtATED 0THER COP'ES FOR USE AS
- FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC ,g, SerVICOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 8 7 - ' s h' PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE F OF O PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE
$dNNO(
Ky - (1W - % , f(V- %) a4] KV-%C 5 %.d " c,o be bo y 9,, Y Q H.k % %rs k<m Ygt b y . VC. <s Lii'- 114 3 4V - 2 L91 , dv - n w , Pv - t w , t.a s -tu 1 'av-72aQ, F V n e t- 9 f t. S ti Iw p */ fs.
'? ; 9 ' 7 As u.4 4 n WJy I4y-q -m i , PV -ilu ,
pt/- nyu,up- p '-
- / ng , -
- Lc i 7. 8
- p.s sI e - ' ,f ,5 y 4 ( .L r M -d c% ;'23(g-gis 0 6 M ) lue*. % ,s.-
l ,(k .h
- L eg .)
w,Jc ac.I pa s NIT LATOR DATE O YES O NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROvEOF DEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEMPORARY (SINGLE USE) O YES O NO IS EC REVIEW REQUIRE 07 O LONG TEAM TEMPORARY . MPIRES C YES O NO IS OC REVIEW REQUIRE 07 O PERMANENT OCCF ATTACHED C COR-00R ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERvtSOR'S SIGNATURE) 10ATEI DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECutRED FOR ALL MAINTENA NCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICA L SPEC; FICA TION SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRA TIVE PROCEDURESI DATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL IREQUIREO If WCRK REQUIRES OC OR LWOLVES TESTING 0R MA:NTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENT) PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF DATE PLANT MANAGEMENT ST AFF . SRO DATE RESPONS 8LE FOR PERSON DATE PROCEDURE AUTHOR 2ER DATE PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE EATENDED EAPIRATiON RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON OATE l l DATE: l PORC MEETING NUMSER DATE l EAT ENDED EAPIRA T40N RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE j DATE. PORC MEETING NUM BER DATE l I ( ! EA T ENCED EAP1RATJON RESPONS;8LE FOR PERSON DATE DATE. PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE l l Form 8 s MD3385 INritATOR. FORWARD ORIGINAL TO PORC CLEmil ATTACH COPY TO PROCEDURE BE.NG CEV1ATED OTHER CCFES FOR USE A$ NECESSARi
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public poR NO. SerVICOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 57 'i%/ PAGE 7 OF f PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE M,NN CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE TO 4:,1-38,3 q qi 3 sp, " l 5%.15 f\% wt i k %m " Y. r .5 . V '< \ v t ' . d i '.1 9, % '. ly ? , p ,,. 1 v,, o, J ev- : tu q)) r e af'n . j r e - Ne-t y
.y.-
Q!s , t.h e ( " ' N% l *)l R _ Ln, b ? h,!ct s h ~j s 's - * % N (, i; . ; ,g C I /, e j A y a_, e ,. ,, ,, - ; e A 1.
- y .4 ) ;g f egg i r . -, , \ p. d %
T3 4 C - 3 i, S 'j ,4 I, - , e , " sNiitA TOR OATE O YES O NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPROVE 0? OEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEMPORARY (SINGLE USEI O LONG TERM TEMPORARY uplRES O YES O NO IS EQ REVIEW REQUIRED? O PERMANENT DCCF ATTACHED O YES O NO IS QC REVIEW REQUIREO? O CDR OOR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR S $1GNATUK3 (DATEl OATE EO REVIEWER APPROVAL IREQUIRE3 FCR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TEChkCAL SPECIFICA T10N SURVEILLANCE. AND ADMINISTRATib1 PROCEDURES) 9 ATE QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL tREQU) RED If WDRK REQUIRES QC OR INVOLVES TES TING OR MAlNTENANCE ON S AFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENT)
. APPR e VALS OATE PLAN T MANAGEMEN STAFF SRQ QATE PLAN T MANAGEMENT STAFF QATE PROCEDURE AUTHORt2ER DATE RESPONS.8LE FOR PERSON PORC MEETANG NUM8 ER DATE RESPONS18LE FOR PER SON DATE E.ATENCEO DPiRATiON DATE:
PORC MEETING NUMBER DATE RESPONSISLE FOR PERSON DATE EATENCED EAP RATION DATE: PORC MEETING NUVBER DATE RESPONSE 8LE FOR PERSON DATE EA T EN GE Q EAPiRA T K)N DATE: PCRC MEETING NUMB ER DATE Form i'1772 313385 WmATOR. FORWARD ORIGINAL TO PORC CLERE. ATTACH COPY TO PROCE0VRE BEING DEVIATED. OTHER CCP ES FOR USE AS NEC
o . o FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION o Public Pm ~0. f"7 - ' 5 ; 4 Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE b OF b PROCECURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE M,NN CHANGEO FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE Ib!$.N bI Me% % v[ hk,e( 0r yefi f y pl ued W, - 2 . 9 ; h to t Cf r - fA 4.a+ la d Wf t f y
- l. . O i s d
- t t. l i[% k L.,k 1
, C. Iv t C {e% \
W
';/ s W d,p L: 14 loJ 4 1-e s- ,
%I-39 %) wS y 4b 3 v A. e p ., . ,
Oh.4.% l% , _ MG l 4) hmk in C
ATCH E N S - I'11 $ ~S l (0 -d 7 %%h s ro PnA rcH E Ms - 14 i$ -s ! 10 -f ? !/MC. h u /t'1 stA- H 7 3 S I l- 9P I 2-t/J nva Cc>panrcJ-t ! M - u w,2 ! c 91_ lJ'f // ! L:Ms-l2<?-3 I to -2 7- !Rur I l_ i DIM ENSIO N A AINSDECTION PLACE OF MEADEMENT l CRITERIA \1 A/F \ A/L i OC \ M l N __ _ !\ \ ! Wi !\L i N q- I Ni ! \% I N' i t, N ! \ K \, ! / i N i7 \ ! /A i ! N i \ j \' i i N ! \ ! i j I \ l i Venfy Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: i i ! i ! i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): O StopWork C NCR C CAR C Tagged Comments F~ut> C Ts ON A L TEs TS c A) St Abis 5ysTEs s 4 STEAM s/AwST H V - 2 ? 51 4 1/6 H ti-Z 2.0 t Eom ir! TU.ctDNE AL&G AbitTH FAja Ldv8L f. .5 TGr's S. I.14 ava E i < Loc Al. O d 3 E}vA ricA) AAlb Tomorz c/ LLs LJS AGdcno^) Akd dorri SdT/JfACTOd Y . w 3 .mF1 A mi c 3 -! ~2 -1 1- STEP,s 5.2.14 An '6 S. 2.15 AaB JArisrAcro&Y ^%!c [27-M- GD.r >M,y_ n-,c,.J ei. e., & c< or stue eor t o >- ciac c><s cw? cu2 ~35G, <* 'b . 2, 't, 'l . u, - - -G .1l1,, e, . a . 2, - E, a_O i% 5 7~ 1 if 8i ,?, /,1 - - . f~- '2 2 w N \l.2 d i:In e ;> e.e dJae a,t i O -lI s >= o L lxs i ' o c< S k-p n oa / 'r' .z. i 7 s - l ~ s' .r. / ' x r t. 's.r # 5 r, r s 4.1 ' r. 6. L s , 6. 4 .r <.. r .c '7. > 5. 7. t . s.7. y' f. 7. .r ) d' r. i ' * / .s- 't T v '5. 7 r 'i' 9. / ) 5. r v ' r 9. v' .s4 1 r s'm. s' 4" to. A. f.Ic.'y f /e.f l ' y it/ f N 1. S 15. *,/ 1t/Y s's't . i s's n. 2. f./$ 4/ r13.. .k' alt:',S xf43 's u ,/ldu.- A D1xr7 ' ' ' ' Ve r.ie ,b J cSez a r u er- A.tc., J .,l n f 4 / - l r .'11-w -o c z t .9 SA>> ry c ~e'. h 5 a .1 % Sa i9 ' C et . ) > . LJ gLxS A /t co_1. g l]lg.k u154 5 ' F T- 2im l' JTefs 1. 3.1-1 '.5 Xis S.4.t4 Aijo 5.4.15 L ccAL. ottex an, acs) or H V iL2s1 /lNa HL/ 2202 AA6 SA'TtWACTbRY AU)C. .*7 - 2 et J $- 9( R C 3 2 7-5 7 \le s.' (l JA F G;n : f.2.-2 cr- s. 2 . u e f ir .? f X t A aoy't; t, lo :W2' -r -d-f ' I w 7 ; (Insoectionts[Testisl Chmoleted jiQtisfactory. _ tes Z No ! If NEemplain and refr/enge appida[le documents in comment section. , Inspected s- _i Date8t // 7 sc ve m usm / FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION o - Public SerVICet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of ' Equtoment Number REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecu;oment Name S2#O/S - 0 & M Manual MM Egpgengogatron L _/ f4;4_6p/xxL_ fw, _ Ssn No. & Inspection Type S // NCR No. ## Work to be Periormed #7 JF76-/ CWP No. OtherDA N CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT Call 'CD IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION QC ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE A ' i u .r j I $_ ! %>/_ _ i 'l ' (7 % I , I I PN ~ ~ N DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLA M EASUREMENT I CRITERIA i A/F j A/L i QC N ! ! ! ! ^ as s ! l \ ! ' ' /d 2/ l l /d?/m_ \ i I ' " / N I t ! l X ' i 1 i N. ! i i i N . Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: * ! 1 1 l ! l Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): C Stop Work G NCR C CAR U Tagged Comments i \/-C L , 2_Le. o oPddd/>bds )& S /d a s ! / , $l $o ln'eE. $ /o W $4 f.L m2 O l 2_ e A .D 15 l / j J f i I l l t i t i [ rnspect.ondsf2 Teetetomo!eted Satisf actory. % -' N o ' it NOWpiain and referece applicMe documents in comment section. Inspected b M, -- ~ Date 3/2WN , ,. n m n m , - FT cll?6-J e-l W ,.< Page 1 o f 15 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION O SerVICO'"Pusuc SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: 8 FT O CCT O T-Test CWP 87 ,19/o Prepared By: O ? N7 Reviewed By- 7 (Preparer) (Date) (Supervisor) (0 ate) l Safety / Environmental Yes 2 E b N I'y h. l Evaluation Required: O No fj f.e . je-ncede[c h--4-P7 l (Nuclear Lic( - Op6 rations)w' (Date) l Review / Concurrence: 2 772 bI 9-vd l A ervices) (Oate) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: / / t / // C7 (Technical Services) (Date)' PORC Review Required: Yes O No PORC #: RORC 719 APR.4- 1987 NFSC Review Required: /7 / No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: v C M b te- 67 ' (Station Manager) /(Date) ssion to Initiate Test Completed: V 7 bTest c nductor) (Oste) Inspection Completed: \f s d- D Supervisor Review: d/// V 7 (Depar ment Sup'ervisor) (Date) Notification of Test Completion and Results: / Y -[~ k 7 hift Supervisor) ' (0 ate) 10CFR 50.59 Review: / (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) mu e rm.m.r~a s-J ' s 1 0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To. verify correct operation of the modifications made by OR's which vere generat e af t er complet ion of the original CCT's and FT's f or CN-2176 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary R sponsibility S = Support Electricians ___S____________ Operations __________________ Results ________P____________ Other _______________________ 22 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/ CUP. 23 Coordination with operations is necessary to assure the circulators are self turbining. 3 0 PREREQUISITES 3.1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date ____/Ik_______ ____________________ ________________ _______________ ____________________ _________g______ --------.-n7 ,_- , . - - - - - - - - ,---r- . - - -, ,,- .-- ,,-~,w - . ,,_e-- -- , , - - - , , , O 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 4.1 Department Approval _______________ __ Dept. Supervisor _J f 7 Date 4.2 Hech/Elec Clearance Issued. if required: Number __ 4.3 Radiation Ucrk Permit Issued, if required: Number _ _ 5 0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The folouing steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a QC hold point. QC 5.1 All OR's to the CUP being tested have been . g4 gess reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP p p gg f7_ DR's revleued: _________________________________ _ N_~_% '.2 k _Il _y _% - 2]_G_ _I_f_&n_& _Dfjr_ _yg e, _}9.n. _e_< nl_o_) _ __ - . _c_o_.~_y~c_le_H_s u_R_ _e< _ ____ __ n_6_f fY~_2 I76_ _I _A_ _ _ _ff*.2_I __ _/?_ ? Init. Date 5.2 Verify that both circulators A and B are at least shutdoun to self-turbining. 53 Close the follouing valves, if necessary. a) FV-2205 b) HV-2201 c) HV-2203 __4__9 ______ 5.4 Pull the XCR modules out of 1-10, 1202P9 and 1002P9. 55 At TB-1204 in I-10. remove the jumpers between 1204-51 and 1204-52 ~ 2@ ~ ~ ~ .W 36 At T8-1204 in 1-10. remove the jumpers betueen - s?i/y/r7 1204-52 and 1204-53. g PORC 719 APR 4- 1987 k . 5.7 At TB-1002 in 1-10, remove the jumpers betueen 1002-43 and 1002-44. W , T\g/ 5.8 At TB-1002 in 1-10. remove the jumpers between FF V/ /f 7 4 1002-44 and 1002-45. ~f5~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [V _ [ 5.9 Reinstall the XCR modules in 1-10. 1202P9 and NN #' ' 1002P9. 5 10 At I-10, reset the follouing XCR' s , if necessary: a) XCR-93241A 1201P5 g p b) XCR-93149A 1201P9 g 4-17 c) XCR-93239A 1201P7 d) XCR-93137A 1201P11 e) XCR-932418 1001P5 f) XCR-931498 1001P9 g) XCR-932399 1001P7 h) XCR-931378 1001011 i) YCR-9337A 1202P9 ji j) XCR-93378 1002P9 5.11 At I-10 TB-1204 Install a jumeer from 1204-52 t o g r e t.n d . _ 20RC 719 APR.4- 1987 5.12 At 10 verify that the follouing XCR's are tripped: CEC a) XCR-9337A 1202P9 bk> 4n enl ' b) XCR-93241A 1201P5 c) XCR-93149A 1201P9 d) XCR-93239A 1201P7 e) XCR-93137A 1201P11 [Af2. 5 13 At I-10 TB-1204 remove the j un.p e r between 1204-52 and ground. ~ ~ d ~ 3't. ej[V '5 14 At I-10, verify that the follouing $90 XCR's are reset: G2C- a) XCR-9337A 1202P9 [_ w.Wess / ___ ______ }di df M d' b) XCR-93241A 1201P5 - c) XCR-93149A 1201P9 7 __J_f'2'____ d) XCR-93239A 1201P7 7 9/bb e) XCR-93137A 1201P11 p'f . 5.15 At I-10 TB-1002, install a jumrer from 1002-44 to ground. j A( PORC 719 APR.4- 1987 ,, _. -l 5 16 At. I-10 verify that the follouing XCR's are tripped: $C a) XCR-93378 1002P9. w A nes5 ___ ______ T& $ f g,77 b) XCR-932d1B 1001P5 c [ c) XCR-931498 1001P9 d) XCR-932398 1001P7 e) XCR-93137B 1001P11 5 17 At I-10 TB-1002, remove the j umper between 1002-44 and ground. / cscimt m rv 5.18 At I-10. verify that t he f ollowing XCR's are reset: ~ a) XCR-93378 1002P9 "# / b) XCR-932418 1001P5 q % d J R 77 __________ c) XCR-931498 1001P9 [ d) XCR-93239B 1001F7 , e) XCR-931378 1001P11 5 19 At CR-141-1A in I-10 (bay 1200). place a jumper across contact numoer 4 and verify the following: CdC. a) XCR-93241A (1201P5) i s reset
- w. bess
,Y V't 9_7 b) XCR-93149A (1201P9) is reset h ._________ i M C 7 1 g 9p9.4,198, - a~ a, - . --- w- , - , ,.,,-..-,,,,---.--,..,,7m-, , , , , -,,,c- - , ,----,,--e ,,,-.--y _.7,,- ,-,-,,-,w. ,e, - - - , - - , , 1 c) XCR-93239A (1201P7) is tripped ____2____ d)~ XCR-93137A (1201P11) is tripped 5 20 Remove the jumper from CR-141-1A. -~ 6 J 'Q b-B7 I V 5 21 At CR-153-1A in I-10 (bay 1200), across contact number 4 and place a jumper verify the Mh2 following: Qc a) XCR-93241A (1201P5) is tripped 5 -~ ~~~---- j b) XCR-93149A (1201P9) is tripped c) XCR-93239A (1201P7) is reset d) XCR-93137A (1201P11) is reset 5.22 Remove the jumper from CR-153-1A. ~h~N@'k (/ 5 23 At CR-141-1B in I-10 (bay 1000), place a jumper M 7 across contact number 4 and verify the following: G C. a) XCR-932419 (1001P5) is reset / W4de55 ,,,/____ 'b b) XCR-931493 (1001P9) is reset ( 4 -77 - -- ------- c) XCR-932399 (1001P7) is tripped q d) XCR-931379 (1001P11) is tripped h 20RC 719 APR.4- 1987 W "'u IY < iavMn 4 5025 At'CR-153-1B in 1-10 (bay 1000), piece a jumper across contact number 4 and verify the follouing: a) XCR-932418 (1001P5) is tripped b he SJ b) XCR-931498 (1001P9) is tripped p4'-77 c) xCR-932398 (1001P7) is reset ( d) XCR-931378 (1001P11) is reset 5.26 Remove the sumper from CR-153-18 ~ %i'U~4%~~67[V 5.27 Pull the XCR modules out of I-10 1202P9 and M 7 -_ k ___ 5 28 At TB-1204 reinstall tne jumper between 1204-51 " and 1204-52. / >~ _rv 5 29 At TB-1204, reinstall the jumper between 1204-52 M and 1204-53. , 5 30 At TB-1002. reinstall the jumper between 1002-43 and 1002-44. MVN / y - g-- --- 5 31 At TB-1002 reinstall the jumper betueen 1002-44 8 and 1002-45., p - p-n---- 5.32 Reinstall the XCR modules in I-10, 1202P9 and 1002P9. /) _ ___T____ epsc 719 APR.4- 1907 .' ,* ., l , 1 5 33 At 1102P9, press HS-93379-A and verify that the yellou lights are lit on XCR-9335A, XCR-9337A, 1 g and XCR-9339A (1202P9). ' gy,bgeSS -- ------- ~ pot oT 5.34 At 1102P1, press HS-93379-B and verify that the yellou lights are lit on XCR-93358, XCR-93378. G. C and XCR-93398 (1002P9). -, W ll.f7 ---------- 5.35 Verify that both circulators C and 0 are at least shutdown to self-turbining. t 5.36 Close the following valves, if necessary. a) FV-2206 b) HV-2202 ~ ~ ~ ~M - ~ c) HV-2204 ~~~~ g '~ 5 37 Pull the XCR modules cut of I-10, 602P9 and 402P9. 5.38 At TB-602 in I-10, remove the jumpers between n 602-43 and 602-44. pff[( ' m .L U 5.39 Ai TB-602 in I-10. remove the Jumpers betueen A @A > 602-44 and 602-45. g _ g _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ y 5.40 At TB-404 in I-10. 404-73 and 404-74. remove the jumpers between d vf M m _rv 5 41 At TB-404 in I-10, remove the jumpers between 404-74 and 404-75 t f{ 5 42 Reinstall the XCR tr.edules in I-10, 602P9 and g.yy,7 4:2P9. 20Rc 7 1 g ppg _4. ;9g7 5.43 At I-10. reset it- T 11ouing XCR' s , if necessary: a) XCR-93242A 601P5 m ,4 ness b) XCR-93150A 601P9 To t n Y c) XCR-93240A 601P7 i,ll-17 f ---__f.-____ d) XCR-93138A 601P11 e) XCR-93242B 401P5 g f) XCR-93150B 401P9 g) XCR-93240B .401P7 __b ___ h) XCR-931338 401P11 pgi __________ i) XCR-933/A h1 602P9 j) XCR-933 g,ggc4 402P9 49 __________ 5.44 At I-10 TB-602, install a jumper from 602-44 to ground. 5 45 At I-10, verify that the folicuing X f.R ' s are tripped: g Q(- a) XCR-933#A 3 602P9 . w,4 mess 4 __________ g, b) XCR-93242A 601P5 ; c) XCR-93150A 601P9 h d) XCR-93240A e01P7 , e) XCR-93138A 601P11 p BOX NN 5.46 At I-10 TB-4B+4. remove the jumper betue'n . 602-44 and ground. ~ rv 5.47 At & fMA? I-10, verify that the follouing XCR's are reset: NC a) $/ f M.t4 XCR-933/A 41 602P9 wAws Y\ - ___.z..____ Po t Ik b) XCR-93242A 601P5 ' ,f 7 __________ f c) XCR-93150A 601P9 d) XCR-93240A 601P7 e) XCR-93138A 601P11 - 5 48 At 1-10 TB-404, install a jumper from 404-74 to ground. [( J ,b 4 _W 8 "Ma 5 49 At I-10, verify that the following rCR's are tripped: 7,1bc5 g a) XCR-933 8 1 402P9 - L o . % e s. S p b) XCR-932429 401P5 g f7 c) XCR-931509 401Po d) XCR-932408 401P7 i eenc 719 APR+ GM e) XCR 931388 401P11 5 50 At I-10 TB-404, remove the jumper between 404-74 and ground. ~~ ~d' IV 5 51 At I-10, verify reset: that the follouing XCR's are f$ ygg7 t p O 'gces Qc a) XCR-933pB q 402P9 Cv , bu e 'G-b) XCR-932428 401P5 Pola b h/- f 7_ c) XCR-931508 401P9 d) XCR-932408 401P7 f e) XCR-931388 401P11 [p 5 52 At CR-142-1A in 1-10 (bay 600). place a jumper across contact number 4 and verify the follouing: GQC a) XCR-93242A (601P5) is reset ( b) XCR-93150A (601P9) is reset ?ot n Y ( h/-/ 7 e) XCR-93240A (601P7) is tr1pped d) XCR-93138A (601P11) is tripped / 5 53 Remove the jumper from CR-142-1A. i _ _ _ _ _7 _ _ _ 19 3V h? % ls7 20RC 719 APR.4- 1987 5 54 At CR-154-1A in 1-10 (bay 600), place a jumper across contact number 4 and verify the following: . QC a) XCR-93242A (601P5) is tripped ,gfk - - - - V- - - - - (c M e#3 b) XCR-93150A (601P9) is tripped ~90 w ggy c) XCR-93240A (601P7) is eeset / d) XCR-93138A (601P11) is reset f 5 55 Remove the jumper from CR-154-1A. SV JW 5.56 At CR-142-1B in I-10 (bay 500), place a jumper M y/yf7 across contact number 4 and verify th9 follouing: a) XCR-93242B (401P5) is reset Qc [ Co N C 6 b) XCR-93150B (401P9) is reset ,,+ -- ---- -- c) XCR-932408 (401P7) is tripped d) XCR-931388 (401P11) is tripped 5.57 Remove tr.e jumper from CR-142-10 5.58 At CR-154-1B in I-10 (bay 400), place a Jumper across contact number 4 and verl iv the #E'/'/)f /f 7 following: Qc g e , .3 p a) xCR-932428 (401PS) is teipae4 g //47 b) xCR-931508 (401P9) is tripped g c) XCR-932408 (401P7) :5 re5et 20RC 719 APR 4- 1997 d) XCR-931388-(401P11) is eeset 5.59 Remove the jumper from CR-154-18 5 60 ~~ Ehk'~~I(/ - Pull the XCR modules out of I-10, 602P9 and. MYVh 5 61 At TB-602. reinstall the jumper between 602-43 and 602-44. -- g g g ,y g 5 62 At TB-602, reinstall the jumper betueen 602-44 I and 602-45. - g y py y 5 63 At TB-404, reinstall the jumper between 404-73 and 404-74. - yg g 5 64 At TB-404 reinstall the jumper between and 404-75. 404-74 --~ g g -- y 5 65 Reinstall the XCR modules in I-10, 402P9. 602P9 and 'N 7 g i 5.66 At 502P9, press HS-93380-A and verify that the i g yellow lights are lit on XCR-9334A, XCR-9336A, g ,9 e c3 and XCR-9338A (602P9). 5 67 At 502P1, press HS-93380-8 and verify that the yellow lights are lit on XCR-93348, XCR-93363, and XCR-93333 (402P9). [p po: 4 i /-F 7 eoRc 719 Apg 4 1937 */ 5 68 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3 1). include the FT 4 and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l SOrvicew PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/P[ NO.fT-2176 m i SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE I e4 I CATEGORY TY PE: C CN OVERALL C CN SUBYlTTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT Z TEST REQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PAOCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT: CLASSI N YES C NO ENGINEER ED SAFEGUARD 2 YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN @$YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 3 YES C NO S AFETY RELATED $ YES C NO/hd/OcdQECUglTYSYSTEM C YES f2 NO REMARKS r ./ % /rn, # d 9 se bJ /T1f//w! W 1 % ob.
- 1. DOES THl$ ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS, COYPONENTS, EQUIPMENT. TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? K YES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: EINE Se r% X .' /. 2). I , /,2. 7. /4.1. 4- T~ / 4, M;2.2 l k_?. b. T , 7. E, 711 & 9, %l, le %. 3.1 f, , O .$, W 2. '5' ?!2 af 9. W 9//!9,12 f)0 2,h' ID ?'i ~lW W k'.2,1414,P, A. I4. cVl. > <d. &, i VIo. IVII: Al so /B.5,'2f C J.% V2, IS'.
9A fl.1 7 2 W,24 , N v W Dl~~ ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' LLQ W(/ I, ti,2. l' ~ j ' / '$h' S u T.
- 2. DOES THE ACTivlTY REQUIRE 'iH AT CH ANGE(S) BE MADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? C YES %NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
- 3. DETERM:NE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED is AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLCWING GUIDELINES:
(Al HAS THE PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPMENT lYPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVlOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BEEN INCRE ASED) C YES S NO STATE B ASI ?5 Y? Tf I$ Nin G MP rrM e u) ? N N-f~ e r1 r $~v*~ S$nhL m Am 5A e Cirtidsh..-r-2 k n' VkL lM btAn t1 % Oft S/ddMN o I _v e .' Tkse e G e . +Aa. acLyd,w p$ y), ggff._ ,sa/pg .S?RnrM c,'m uLrv in ! i I As a 'ne a f4e,t - Ha. ,r2.e em , cv w
- w. . cL, e,r- ? Ic-ro '
(B) H AS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR YALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREVIOUSLY g IN THE FS AR BEEN CREATED? C YES 8*O STATE BASIS: b'* "__ N . A/o M e#n T n_l fit t- ? />wd P 5' dre C-res e D a, ee HL C)rca l derS h n 'M l M 4-d oes 24n? k m am el ~ N ,_ reu % ir ~.r&Wr7) ' J (C) H AS THE YARG;N OF S AFETY, AS DEFINED IN THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNI AL SPEC:FIC ATION OR IN THE FS AR BEEN pEDUCED) C YES NO STATEBASig. 01 c e S$c l' ce t c er s' 5 _T uhln -n Go d i'kt,. CiV*tri!d /'50 ( t' n t*>1 e f& ni n' l l ANe d o r ,' n a SLG 4en Mc #1.1r os In ' e 4 5% Ee 4 'I s' u a ( Ad e d. ' ' DOEE' ACTIVITY APPEAR TO INVOLVE AN UN AEVIEWED S AFETY OUESTION U YES [ NO l W BE S AF ETY SIGNIFIC ANT C YES [NO I eY-- aum .-{ " 4 a- 4 7 - APPROveDn Xs,-i Nd,adnn Lv 4 -+u, 4 7
- an _L~ kh _ - o n Aeleen 5om < C P2 02 3382 /
l l FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ) SerVlCO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN / OTHER Ik ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. /~T-2 f 7& T PAGE / e4/ CATEGORY ( TYPE: Z CN Overall Z CN Submittal Other M-2 / 74d Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? g Yes : No St te basis T.b.y RNhl'bv l~5 cen[!n,otl h t H.L f en rb~r n cl I h krN n>_ h ad /d in'U J ls the activity required to achieve Compliance with Federal. State or local environmental regulations? Z Yes )('No ; Applicable Regulations h0TL If e t"er sosseris res, the actvry oces notinvo:s e an unre>>esed enscront-entalcuest en S gn and care the form 11ectn ansaers are No. the act 6:ty has r?e catent al for creat ng an u nrev e A ed ens trcnt"ental avest on Cor c ete tse re~a neer of this evaraten form EVALUATION (UseaskEtionap sheetsif require S 1. is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Z Yes No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the act:vity invoNed is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.) (Al Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES7 : Yes Z No State basis 1 i _.. (B) Will this activity result in a significant enange in the types. or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents. or a significant increase in the authonzed oower les eP Yes Z No State basis I , (C) Does thrs activity invoNe an environmental matter not previously reuewed and evaluated in the FES) l Z Yes Z No State basis Does the actrvity invoNe an unreveaed environmental question) Z Yes Z No By_ ./ R&_A s v.a'.ai p f U $' 7
- i Approved
.j A b o jmesba )_d _V' *i / M #"N
- 4 i w anej / % - p w ++ k sc v...;44m % 4
l FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ,, O SerVlCOsPUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 97-[bO[ PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I OF- / PROCEDUR E NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE FT Jo% ~3 e f 7~ f, (wit {,. ) 9f, f la 71+ .;94 14 mf 76 :7(. .]h W1.NO No/ CH ANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE c y :) >'Cf.9 3 3 6 A >< cC- 93 3't'b O)
- . s t, y. .*/ c. e", y*s*Wyna h N 1
('re n c.g.913 9A Jck' WR not cc.933 C A - JCV93H k X'E . 93)(y/1 J \ cis . ? 3 3't O d%er cc mya Jcc.'m'fC re:ptal y, 1L corresfr~k [.j[ Spc t, 'o., n u s~ b u f C Att s,;ti ceu o et 7.i:(!T 9336B te f4Gj) W -W M 567 xcP,9339g y * $* 4 Ed sC i 13]c /} a ct. y3 yf /} p ; -y, llo[IS /*<$ r. 97 " S' 9 3 3U lK e f-93 3 Y/l l' firA M3 (c6 9 336 6 z c je. 933 y S ,, ',3'f f,'f scK.13 3 L B xcd- 9334 6 er / N., /0)W ( vts : No is PRoCsoLRE PORC APPRONID? DEVtATION CATEGORY: MEMPORARY isiNott ust) $/c/:r7 Fyis : No IS EQ REVEW REQUIRE 07 C LONG TERM TEMPOR ARY . EXPtPES YY E S C NO IS OC REvi'.'W P EOulRED? i O PERMANENT 0CCF ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED MA 4 M-d N / i' M l I is #Enviso s sv irtREi ioATEi //e / MW. V>; QATE EO REVIEWER APPROVAL - 1REQu: RED FOR ALL Ma1NTENANCE. RESulTS.hCHNICAL SPECiflCA TION SURVETLA NCE. A ND ADMINISTRA DVE PROCEDURESI L . QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL 'M f' c- - .RECV'REO ff aCRK REQutRES OC OR WVOLVE5 7ESTWG OR MAINTENANCE 0N SAFETYRELA TED EQUIPVE4TI N
- W. )
APPRQVAl v NTMAN 'EvtNT et CAit PLAN M ANAutMtNT ST AFFpQ CATE VL . [ f f (;{s< at / s us . - * . Y U .d'E ? EL&'5PC N DW l' ^ PlfR$0 Q )/j f'PCRCV duKdc OATE +b-79 & J L. . , //E. PROCE0uRE At4 THOR 41R DATE v+-n *' NO NLM8tR ,e OATE LATENOtQ DPIR AT6CN RiSPON52BLE FOR PERSON Daft DATE PORC MEETING NLYB ER CATE iA f ts;t0 EAPiRAT4GN RE5 PONS.BLE FOR PERSON Q A T (, i OATE. PORC MEtTiNG NvM8tR ~ OAfg E sitN;tO EAP1R AT 4CN RESPONS BLt FCR PERSON CATE DATt. PCRC MEET 6NG NUMSER gAfg s ~~ F,3T2 30 3385 6NITIATOR.FCR A ARD CR 3;'.46 TO PORC CLERE ATTAC'4 CCh TO PROCEOLRE SE NG O(VA'[D. QTHER CCP ($ FCR L$( A5 NECi$$ AR - m FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of / Ecu pment Number REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecwoment Name S/80/i _ M 0 & M' Manual M# Equ pment Location A/L L 64 s/<r,4 /d'M - SSR No. .' M /4 Inspect.on Type .5' //6 NCR No. M4 Work to be Performed N7' :#/ W - 3 CWP MI . o ,er 4 74 'J V' // A CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT l ,C 6 d f G .2~ CAllBRA c l lDENTIFICATION CALIBRATION QC ~ # ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE ~ A/ A ) I l YN/ - lv'd? N I IN I I N DIMENS_ ION AL INSPECTION PROF MEASUREMENT l CRlYdRIA l A/F A/L QC N ! ! N i ! N i \ a) ' , ~ /i l I ~ 4 4/-t T m' ~ i i l I l i i Ni l i ~ D. Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: Mk l I l i l i ~ Quakty Control Actions Utilized (Checkh O StopWork O NCR O CAR O Tagged Comments \l t .l , r: ,p o ty p .t ec al /i s .'s 3 su -/ j .e. ,. c ll e s. n 3/c pS DD f f A / 76 - 3 ' .S~ / X se f f sa. S's IV Z~ JL '3* /P / 'r 'i er s a.i c. a , s.a.n x 34 c w) s. v2 > e d c a; E* U9 5 S'/ EfDJ A r # 5,Ct.' & Tf) 4~ ( L ' s' L '] ! ' il u ' s /c pi LJ Je e ,% .4,g /, . > > > 2c je .* ic r a Pl.n o/e & / . P / f6specttotk/ TestM Co@pleted SatMactory. Ms Z No + NO. eupla n and referen@ applicabl</ documents in comment section. Inspected . l' - - Date ' I~ 7 n... . < m :: sw i ' CCT- 2176-2 'pyhllC FORT ST, VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 4 d SOfICO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF COLORADO s * ( - IITLE: TESTCONTROLFOR$ Type: O ~T $7CCT O T-Test 60/ 24 -2 93 ~ , Prepared By: b' JA //-J'-/6 Reviewed By: .. (% A //.I. f4 (Preparer) {0 ate) Supe ~rvi sor) (Date) Review /Concurrance: t con Akelhw i(QA Services) i s - c e. (0 ate) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No [AAAA.tA- \) N'O (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) .(Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: 824&l.2tv / 87 (Technical Services) (0 ate) PORC Review Required: 8 Yes O No PORC EORc 7 0 7 JAN .8 1987 NFSC Review Required: O Yes 8 No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: 2//. /M[f? (St. on Manager) ~ (Date) Permission to Initiate Test: / } /"I[-D (Sh'TfrTupervi sor) (Date) Test Completed: '/ , k . he t 79 Naa G (Test Conductor) (Date) Inspection Completed: NMmd. W 1 M 'N A Servic s) (Date) Supervisor Review: A . / 3-/347 Depp prit' Jupervisg) .(Date) o n Re ts: . h@M (Shift Supervisor) 9 / - h7 (Date) 10 CFR 50,59 Review: (T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Dath) FORMIC 1372 22 3643 ~ , 1 CCT-2176/-2 l u uy,., ^ Pc g e' . 2 .o f :4 ,yygr.;..u.; . c g,,c p. l or- .+., . . .. .s ',,m h. ~.- s>3.7ff..Kr34;(3.9 1 2 ,. v .c.~/x.ty'. n.pWyj' @- ,.y .. x t.4 Om s% 'y My.3. ! Qg. ;,p::yt f.-y .. .. .e.17 l w i 1.0' PURPOSE OF TEST . .: . . . :5 I 11 To inspect CN changes and verify c o r r e c t n e s s df ."#:;:. installation prior to executing FT. ,
- E.1,. 43;Q.9
.. 31:;';; C. - 2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 7.f _ . ' 21 Department (s).' responsible for CCT..
- s. .,% , ., t,.:S :' . ").ff y }A: N. .'.Q
, P = Primary Responsibility' S = Support Electricians -_p______-_____
- t. .
- v. . 3...., . ..
Operations __-_____ __ ___-_ ~ ;: .yyjf;.G'.'. . . .,,. . o .. Results __S__________--______ . ..4.<...s Other _-___--____--____-_____ 'r,.<,xp-)>.&:a+, a .*M .'< ;'87ft - 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal conditions O ,. different from.that of the CN and therefore no safety le analysis is required. 23 None 3.0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment ' Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date _D.! $ __Y9h_ __.bi_ 0 _$-)_--_____ _l_:5:_%.5--___. 3.2 References __ _h-_____-__-_____-__-_____._________ 4 0 AUTHORIZATIONS - 41 Department Approval _ ________-_-__/__2_9'h __ ep . upervisor Date 42 Hech/Elec Clearance Issued, if required:g Number . 4.3 Radiation Uork Permit Issued. if required: Number . _ ' CCT-2176-2 - . P. age 3 of 4 L ' .V g> ' ~ , ;: ( , +. ,g"*' /. )* .. 5 0 PROCEDURE 51 All DR' s to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FY. CUP * .qq OR's revieved: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _*'_ _ _ _ _ _ I_11_ _g s_____.'. WITNESSg' ~iss T _S_6- B_9X. .d./_:.SJ_ ?.,*,_:J1). :_Ey*_ _E/_ _Gj_:Jd j'_ _ _- ~ 5 , 3. . ' - i f-QC _lhfN_/hDht Init. Datd WITNES5g d POINT . . . 3.~gd ... Check all cables for proper terminations per - ins cTon viring diagrams. ' Mfd Elec_8//f17-CC 5 WITNES5g P O ! N T .... . . . . . . ..dSpot include check terminals for tightness. both internal This shall -Op. A ' and external panel INS CTOR viring. e.u_6b Elec. v. CC WITNESS '# "' ' ' *' * **
- a co ac s and must be verified by rOINT % ~3.,_G.gfconductors
. blocking or continuity check as the case may closing. *M oR be. EJA__Y/h Elec. /- 55 All parallel paths must be opened and each ,f resultant series path checked individually. gg : WM. Elec. V. 5.6 Uhere viring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria, the appropriate organization .uill be notified of the discrepency and , c o r r e c t i o n ma d e b e f o r e c oElec.' n t i n'7u a , 57 Uhere complicated or extensive viring changes have been made, schematics or drawings should be marked over by a Hi-liter as each segment is checked. However, this vill be at the AJfA discression of the CCT performer. N /'I ~ ' &Ld_!!Dh*t Elec'. E
- So '
CCT22176'2 , ..,Page'4 ., -t:. .:.. 2... p e ,1 . of4. , ~ .s . ..@y;. t + . - ....,7...;m ?e. ; ' .?.M..v.,y:v . . 'c :,, . 4 ~ ' s,Yl, <, .*- e{ J. , ,. -' . .
- 58 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section *
(3.1), include the CCTW, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no , test,.,, equipment is used. N/A this step.' . MO e , :, ,, * = b E^ e . e
- t 6 .*
P J 1 1 e i I f i e 1 i I t 4 P I t .._ _ _ . . _ _ . _ , , . - - _ - - . . . _ , - -.------~-------------+e --.--------~~--*~r - ~ - " - - ' - " ' " ' ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' " ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OSOrVlCC= PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY CF CCLCRAD3 CN/TCR/SCR/PC. NO.C&CT-2 /M-SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE / e / / _. CA TEGORY TY PS: C CNOvEaALL C CN SUBVITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT E TESTREQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATICN REPCRT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FS AR> C OTHER CLASSIMCATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STMUCTURES INVOLVED,OR DOES THE ACTIVTTY AFFECT: CLASSI 2 YES C NO ENGINEERED S AFEGUARD E YES C NO SAFE SHUT 00WN N YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 2 YES C NO S AFETY RELATED 3 YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES S NO REMARKS S d DIS i EVALUA TION Use Additaanal Sheets if Regasered ^)
- 1. CCES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS COYPONENTS, ECulPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES CESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? .YYES C NO ,
UST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REVIEWEO: NM Sf f '7/0/)f 4 W#m/ afb.' [2.2,I. /. 2 . Z.. / '/- /, 4#, S / V. di . dv#, 2. 2 . M 3. d. 3 . "7. /. 2 1 / o . 2 V./. 7. Aif. 3 . 7, d'. . P. 2.'2 - Y,2.'4. E 1' 4 , 2 . '9. '/. 'o. //. ~ 9 /f. /o. 'A s. /e3.' 4. M . A' 4 2.2 14!. Ee!. 4,!. 2- l$! A. J. 54.5 /M/ J's!.1). A rs E A 4 E - G r>*+ a.s. 14..' 4 , b; 7,*se.K sp '< n us e., ,lM / es ' M y J 52 > < . 2 N 1 1. 2 1' M ' E. & i
- 2. OCES THE ACTivlTY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGEtS) BE MACE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? C YES 3 NO UST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MACE:
3. DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTINITY INVOWED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION UTIUING THE FOLLOWING GUID (A) MAS THE PROBABluTY OF OCCURRENCE CR THE CCNSECUENCES OF AN ACC; CENT OR MALFUNCTICN CF ECUIPVENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVICUSLY EV ALUATE01N THE FS AR BEEN INCREASE 0? C YES M NO STATE SASIS. .- 7Gs. e n/2 clu k J. -m ,L } r,n_ ,% m f4 h u , m a) r% 6 b M d$* o W-r>4s-9M 1 )EE h4 [-,0. (Ynt s> um g si j5,(Y es$ uNy,ne b n la n ow & ~ AAA. t> 1l'u _< sLe 11_x o ,e .,l, Q , / / Q ~ ' / (81 HAS THE POSSIBluTY OF AN ACC: CENT CR VALFUNCTICN OF A OlFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREN',puSLY IN THE FSAR 8EEN CREATEDP C YES STATE B ASIS. SM SA. A)es os f.u.o ,W NO ln irt'- / W e d O A A / ns. k{ . - - ~ ~ - s s4 m9 hd fn, +k s. m s.p s-e-rs m , / IC) HAS THE MARGIN CF SAFETY. AS CEFINED IN THE B AS;S FOR ANY TECONICAL SPECIFICATICN CR IN TH2 FSAR SEEN REQUCEDP C YES N NO STATE B ASIS: 5'EE' G %4. Es n n. m .s p r-g* y~ ,a l s y A s As es >,n s A* 7 m n ryp. m naor A in rJ- 5l'A GG C-#' jut-h i n s TN s. Alms S ant M A> Le ~7~;d-e M MAk' AA 1eia r6h w
- r*> ! l*@o n P u nc-A sT* Muf->'e-h ' R v "T"Mii ~7"tC5"T" . #
eE S AFETY SIGNIF! CANT C YES M NG~~~ eV d b/M... 6dd.4.f_ APeaOVED '- fk lk 'W
- y. w w . r. . . .
m ,-c - f PUbilC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION CD 61 CAL .. i SOrvlCor PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN ,@ CIT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. C C.T 126 - 2 _ PAGE /^8 / CATEGOltY - TYPE: C CN Overall C CN Submittal @ C_CT- 2. I 76 - 2. Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation. plant construction or previous plant operation? / Yes O No State basis 6' A Ol t)J DJ 14 Cbn $1A)$'b % TAf~ ACCQ. AL&aR; ~1"N /= "TTAK&l.)J? 5ULLblAl[p9kJD TNA & e p .3t3 _9 B 8 ,V Ey 1 Lb ip Q . I is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes 9 No Applicable Regulations NOTE: If e:t"er ansser :s Yes. the act:ss a:es not it'votse on un?eresed e vicnmentoi aurstron. 5:gn and date the form. If born anssers are No. the s:txty has the :orr~t'at for creat>ng an unrevesed eneronmental Quest on Come ete the remaincer of tms esotust>on 1:rm. 6 ATION (Use additionalsheetsif require S 1. Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (F ES) : Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)? Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity invoNed is an unreviewed environrrental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity invoNes an unreviewed environmental question.) (A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact steviously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes No State basis iB) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a signif cant increase in the amounts of effluents. or a significant increase in the authorized power level) Yes : No State basis [C) Ooes this activity invoN e an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES ? Z Yes : No State basis Does the activity invoNe an urreviewed enuronmenta: quest on) Yes : No By
- m. .
b .. ; Approved N_ . , , ' b;,'.S 6 ;eia , j;; ;4 43 g wa s FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public ) SerVICet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page I of 5 Equipment Number {% .4 n1W fQ 45 S ll19hg15 * 'nl'IG % h , MS-9 3TT14 il REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecuipment Name Mud b Nc h O & M Manual / __Equ;pment Location (od v<t flee e SSR No. MM inspection Type EO NCR No. / Work to be Performed C C T "2. I 1 ( T. CWP No. _f,( - E i C Other C G 't 17 C ?. CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT / CAllB R ATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB R ATION QC ! ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION C.tTE / Flv ke I 'rn H H 1 ht l - Tr i -3 f [ / i Al /h I i / i i i / i i I / I i i / DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA i A/F l A/L l OC T I I i j i ! I N ..i I I i ^ N lh i i i i M* 1- M I I i l N i i ! ! N I t I i N Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below: AJl 4 i i i i i i Quality Control Actions Utilized (Check): as ,t . a y , [_. Stop Work O NCR O CAR O Tagged Comments C CT - t \ l s - ((?- 51ent C. l C . 2. 9.1 ' C .4 we n: n uen% ' B 6 Of *Edf 2-4 6 ') Cc t -2 n6 t A d- cle'te 351'y:t 4 9 s 9 \ \ N N N N \ - h N N N N N N N _ s f- -~ . '[Insoectiords(/ Testd) Completed Satisfactory. F Yes C No M'aplain and ref erence applicable documeqts in comment section Inspected By -E ~ - Date 3-O-D . .~ . , . . , ,,: :n.,, .. .. ~ .. :. , . ri uo - / Page 1 of 3 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION A Public f \f67 Scrylco'- Pu:UC CERVICE COMPANY CF CCLCRAD3 TITLE: TEST CONTRDL FORM Type: /_I7 FT O CCT O T-Test CN Y 94 ~~ 2 95 pf y y. gg o - f Prepared By: /b A' T - Id eviewed R By f hw~ //'I- 94 (Preparer) (Date) ((Supe ~rvisor) (Date) Review / Concurrence: encvkrd.wnA-h.pe ,.-,,.% *(QA Services) (Date) Safety / Environmental Yes Evaluation Required: O No 6%MM- l% I) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: MN / - B -8 7 (Tecnnical Services) (Date) PORC Review Required: ,/_W Yes _ O No PDRee8C 7 0 7 JAN 8- i387 NFSC Review Required: O Yes W No NFSC #: Authorized for Use: 82/b (Station Manager) /[F 7 (Date) ssion to Initiate , '-)] , (Shift Supervisor) (Date) Test Completed: N b. d/i / A P (Tes Concuctov) / (Date) Inspection Completed: ' / h/'87 QA Services (Date) Supervisor Review: QhyDe , e .entSupervfor) ~ N-/-@7 (Date) . to nd R ts: N b 'P[ (Shift Supervisor) (Date) 10 CFR 50.59 Review: (T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) m u ici m . = . mo . FT-2176-2 Page 2 of 3 i 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 11 To verify correct operation of neuly installed XCR's required by the new Steam Line Rupture Detection a'nd Isolation System (SLRDIS). j 2 0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT. P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians ________________ Operations __________________ Results___k3._______________ Other _________ _____________ 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/ CUP. 2.3 None 3 0 PREREQUISITES 3 1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date ___J98________ ____________________ ________________ _______________ ____________________ ________&e_______ 3.2 References _,q4e________________________________________ A FT-2176-2 Pese 3 of 3 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 41 Department Approval p pervisor ~ N Date 42 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number _M - 43 Radiation Uork Permit Issued. if required: Number .B - 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The faloving steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential and to not bypass a QC hold point. 51 All DR's to the CUP being tested have been reviewed and are covered by this FT. List CUP DR*s revieued: Bfe -AtSA,%.0-ggh.f.)l. -__--- QC , WITNESS . PolNT b>I'd. ECTCR ------------------------------------------------
- 66. /NdE).
Init. Dh(e QC \'.'lTNESS rcNT gg verify that FT-2176-1 has been run entirety and successfully Completed. in its 5NSFECTCR 5.3 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3.1). . include the FT #. and send it to the Results l Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used. N/A this step. - 8}k---- 1 6 FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
- SOfVICC= PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF CCLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC.
No, EC_2 t'7 6-SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE / e A7 C CNOVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINTCHANGE REPORT 8 TESTREQUEST C TEMPORARY CCNFIGURATICN REPORT C PacCcouRE CHANGE (FSARi C orHER CLAS$1MCAT10N: ARE THE SYSTEMISI EQUIPMENT OR STRUCT1JRES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFICT: CLASSI 2 YES C NO ENGINEER EO SAFEGUARD N YES C NO SAFE SHUTDOWN $ YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM M YES C No S AFETY R ELATED 3 YES C NO S ECURITY SYSTEM C YES X No REMARKS S b bl$ EVALUATION - Use Additsenal Sheets If fleginated
- 1. OCES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS. COM/CNENTS, EQUIPMENT TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES CESCRIBED IN THE FSAR CR TECH SPECS? N YES C NO ,
UST THE APPUCABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED- MYAY S M */0 M #Y V/8W db .* [ 2 . 2 I' . /. 2 . F_. / 4 /. V. S . / V. 6. 4. 2., 2 . 4, 3. 6.1. 7 /. 71/a . 2 V./. 7. Q. 3 .
- 7. 4, . T. 2."2. Y, 2. 'A . ? 2: A. 2. 'T 4 'O. / / ' 9. )Z'. 16.~L %. j a '1 A. N Q 2.2' J M Ed. W. 2 _ / 4. s . J. I4. 8 . / W /6 14. J). AnL A <_ k Gr3 J2 3.c . u.' 11. 11'
- E. 5. 2 4.; ' A - hl Tise G sp e '< sw> u&Ek ? w ' 4W J, %2 ' s.4 /
- 2. OCES THE ACTIVITY REQUt AE TH AT CHANGE (Si SE MACE TO THE FS AR CR TECH SPEC? C YES 3 NO UST SECT 1CNS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGE! TO BE MACE:
3.
CETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN UN AEVIEWED S AFETY CUESTION UTluZ:NG THE FOLLOWING GUICEUNES:
(Al HAS THE PROB ABruTY CF CCCUR AENCE CR THE CONSECUENCES CF AN ACC: CENT CR MALFUNCTION CF ECUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREV!CUSLY EVALUATE 0iN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASE 0?
O YES M No STATE SASIS. SM k@ '2 d I
l
[
tB) HAS THE POSSIBluTY OF AN ACCICENT CR MALFUNCTICN CF A CIFFERENT TYPE'H AN ANY EVALUATED PaEVfuSLy IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATEDP C YE5 M NO STATE BASIS. f4f Ed d n 2 f/* 2 (C) H AS THE MARGIN OF SAFETY. AS CEONED IN THE S ASIS FCR ANY TECwNICAL SPEC;FICATICN OR IN THE FS AR BEEN REDUCED?
C YES Y NO STATE BASIS- 0 0 8N>' 7 # 2 -
O CCES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO: INNOLs E AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY CUESTION C YES y NO
- . ,M)
St PPA 0VED LW e . ,..,. ... ;.,
FomC) 372C Dt2
eI4tr>A L FT-2176-L Pa.y 2d Z.
Eh. /5s deo/ 8Auons+s <1+w/ey in s4dl.e.c/
xce.b fa slebis m ea serum wee > m+
APPROFE/M /r?PO7- 5/4 AM L. /r s o ? P U E. b . N g /a a h e pous+r u,,'// 4 e <er,o v+b sueL-/Aa) >%s va./ve.s a a +.
/oop u>,d+ c -he 1-/ w>*// no + 4+ s+<a k sd . &+4 kop s w:// bs. r%&, sep e<.a+f , so -A4n m*. ha,:, w.'// Ls
+),+ +e-s,G, sunesi,naish,.ogav+ 3 .
5E. /he vs/V6-1 k J/Mf ode. d,44c. / cops w,*// be.
.funchens/ -f),<ougav+ -Me. -h:<. >G .
spp,y<Ms. n e.J u a. 6 d 4 e- .uhia'oe.onoAeAw,/y 4 ss+ aoig, ;,a d se sy,~ .
sc. Gekey,s+ % +, ~ rH f e p Lt>
(i. < . hawke
\
pa.vov 4 .m.% b b. h M n./vsa ) alw,'
-feo da9 ihik bc.hin sel i%s /ab+.s nah anyae A sny sueve//km u rqvirew_w}s -AJ au~> &
cf~ c,/ga,8 7 %%& 'un
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
} SGIVlCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN OTHEA 6 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. - F /7f ,2.-
PAGE _/_o[ /
cArecony.
TYPE: 2 CN Overall Z CN Submittal F t - t1 /f2-Z Are all measurable nonrad;o!ogical effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously d:sturbed dunng site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? )( Yes Z No State basis /hh SCMDj_l$_CCWW&b ~TO 'fHLACLQ5 $_bdy Al&As "TNf- %K8 LATE ~ 5ULLb/A2 CpAAJb *TH6_k6*QL712)?
j EU.11.b.JAtf, a l Is the activity required to achieve comphance with Federal, State oi local environmental regulations? Z Yes No Applicab!e Regulations NO TE If e't~er a sser s Yes t~e a:t+t> coes rct ins ch e an unteresed enscnementalc.est on. S gn and care the foren 11tctn ansarrs a o No.
t*e a:txty has t*e CC!ent al for :"eat *) an ur"ev'es ed enV!an "entsl QJest o s Cerec ete rne re'"a ncer of in s esawar o , form EVALUATION (Use additionelsheetsif require:S 1.
Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) Z Yes Z No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See G 31?
Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the fol!owing guidehnes.
(If the answer to any of the fodowing quest: ens is Yes, then this activity involves an unrevie^ed environmental question.)
(A) Will this activity result in a s;gnificant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis l
(B) Will this actlvity result in a significant Change in the types, or a s:gnificant increase in the amounts of ethuents, or a s'gnificant increase in the authorized power levep ~ Yes Z No State basis 4
(Cl Does this activity involse an environmental matter not previously reviened and evaluated in the FES?
Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity ins oNe an unreuewed environmental quest on) Z Yes Z No Aoproved By m s. .., d M. .._; W _t ss . s.. ( ...
*Ca i . J '. s' 4 d j 's N#
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) Servicet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page [ of /
Equement Numter S4gd/X REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eau pmert Name . . m .._ 0 & M Manual A/ M _
Equ pment locat on A/2g %_4r_
- l- M 3SR No. MM inspect on Tsce Won to be Pedormed
.S//l
/f r j/ 74 - U NCR No. .AlA
^/ A CWP No.
Other WY Al10
- l N CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT CAUBRA lDENTIFICATION C AllB R ATION l ITEMS l NUMBER l EXPIRATION DATE 1
QC I
$N/"
i V_ f. , i i i c/, I I t
'N l i i N.
- DIMENSION AL INSPECTION MEASUREMENT i CRITERIA ! AIF i A/L ! QC i '
t ! 1 i
5f, ' W 1 I
' ~ ,_
j t s~ 6 / l I ^
i i I Verify Proper Material Control For Job List Apohcable DC Numbers Below:
i ,
Quahty Control Actions Utihzed (Check): - -
Stop Work L NCR u CAR _ Tagged Comments / , _
tl . M A
- rd t-e e dl6 8b & rWe /r cav ARQ rl - c a ,., M c. < / c f r n i W- t a s s. R h e ir' x .a _ C t.
7 g
I i
j nsoectiontsp Testis) Completed Sat'sfactory W T No ^
n and referfic : aopheahhocuments in comment section.
Inspected __ yhD Date !
V:::1:V /
~ ~ ~ ~
LLi-a oa-2 4 -
. Page 1 of 4 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
, SCIVlCO'J PUBLIC CERVICE COMPANY CF COLORAD3
\
TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: O FT LI7CCT O T-Test CWP 86-261 Prepared By k d d $ jp Reviewed By: d / SP (Preparer)/ te) (Supervisor) (Oate)
Safety / Environmental 8 Yes Evaluation' Required: O No d f // 7/B>
(Nuclear L'ic. U J eration '(Date)
Review / Concurrence: _ 'w (QA Servic1TT s J//e/*
/
ePJ (0 ate)
Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: M - 3-/3-67 -
( echnical Services) (Date)
PORC Review Required: Lv/ Yes ON g:716 MAR 1. 31981 NFSC Review Required: [, 7Yes LufNo NFSC #:
Authorized for Use: /d-(Appropriate NPD Supt.
/a/l)
FT/CCT) (Oste)
(Stati Mng-T-Test) e ssion to Initiate /p
/ (Shif t Su;fervisor) (Oate)
Test Completed: ! _ [k(Test Conductor) /M, W/4h; 7-(Dat6)
Inspection Completed: N, - .[h . ? //r/h (QVWMices) (Cate)
Supervisor Review: /d (Department S#ervisor) 3-/Y-'@
(Date)
Notification of Test -
Completion and Resuits:
/ /.f /v d-/W 97 (5 if tluffisor) (Gater 10CFR 50.59 Review:
(T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (0 ate)
Fo8W0l372 :: 3M3
,t 4
CCT-2283-2 Page 2 of 4 pub llC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
. $0rylCO' PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 1.1 The CWP for CN-2283 completes the Electrical Tie-In's at I-10 and Bldg #10, Lyl. 5 for CN-2283, CWPAB6-260.
2.0 PRECAUTIONS. LIMITATIONS AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT j P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians P Operations
~
Results S Other 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal cor.dttion different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required.
- ' 2.3 Any steps that are not applicable may be marked N/A and initialed by test conductor.
l 3.0 PRERE0VISITES 3.1 Test Equipment 1
Last Calibration Name Identificattaa No. Date h/11 yfI ' 'M D?--- 1Lll2]OL '
(
~
l 3.2 References CN-2283, CWP 86-260
, 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS
! 4.1 Departmental Approval 7" D, M 4 JJN< u 3 - // 97 De pt.7upe'rvi sor Date 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required Number /3 76 f l 4.3 Radiation Work Permit Issued, if required Number #/4
)
ronwo m.n sa
CCT-2283-2 PubilC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STAYlON
$9 f VICG'> PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The following steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential, and they do not by pass a QC Hold Point.
X 5d~r(diDR'stotheCWPbeingtestedhavebeen NITNE reviewed and are covered by this CCT. List CWP
'OINT O//r DR's reviewed: 86-261-A IN [C YT
%s /3-/s 17
,,,, Init. Date WITNESS 5.2 Checkailcablesforproperterminationsper p0 INT .. 7.:/lf7 wiring drawings.
INSPECTOR
~* [/) .5 /VA)
Elec.
G wiTNES . g j a Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall PolN -
g pgeren include both internal and external panel wiring.
h3 N t/
Elec.
5.4 Check schematic drawings for functiens of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of cther energized equipment,
&N-J/ '
l 'Elec.
5.5 During circuit check, all contacts and conductors must be verified by closing, blocking or i
continuity check as the case may be. It must never be assumed that the relay is energized or deenergized because a circuit is open or closed.
i It must be verified.
b/b3 /94)
Elec.
5.6 All parallel paths must be opened and each resultant series path checked individually.
3lyg)
Elec.
1 FCmv solm.22 3643
,. #* . , CCT-2263-2
,e 4
-Page 4 of 4 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
. 0SOfVICO' Pusuc sanvica ccMPANY OF c LcnAno l
5.7 Where wiring and contact arrangements do not meet -
CN criteria, the appropriate organization will be l notified of the discrepancy and correction made l before continuation of the CCT. !
hsw-Pf
- leC. , j 5.8 Where complicated or extensive wiring changes have been made, schematics or drawings should be '
4 marked over by a Hi-liter as each segment is checked. However, this will be at the discretion -
of the CCT performer.
1
' J (9 6f
' 'Elec.
(
5.9 Make a copy of the test equipment section (3.1), I includetheCCT#,andsenditgotheResults Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is i
used, consider this step N/A. !
be
! E/R W. ,
t f
L j
i i
d t
'l k I
FCw rD1372 22 3643 I
I Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION g gg
. O$gryl cgm PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PC/T I
NO. CCT- :z e rba SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE I Of 1 '
OATEGORY a TYPE:
C CNOVERALL C Cu SUBMITTAL C SETPOiNT CHANGE REPORT C TEST R80 VEST C TEMPOR ARY CONFiGunAfiON REeORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) OTHith CLAS$lFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEMISI EQUIPMENT jf R STRUCTURESINVOLVED,OR DOE 4 fNE A. MVITY AFFICT CLASSI C YES C NO ENGINEERED S AFEGUARD C YES @ NC S AFE SHUTOOWN C YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 2 YE7 C NO S AFETY RELATED 3 YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C vEs 2 cO REMARKS
- 1. COES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT. TESTS. EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES CESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? LI YES C NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED- FS AR Sec t . ' l L h l' 4 S 2 1 'd . 4 , is , Z. 7.1 7.I_ 7 1.S.t,7'f t r . t . T,. S' 2. s 9. L 7 t 17 ,
#w.i hAcJ. d . s. t c r U i . to f - , ii . t t L
0 T. 5 . - oc. (u,, .t c q . c. ,i + ,o . 4 l
(R 6. 4 .1 , 5. 4 .7 E . (, .1, 5.co.y
(
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVIT( REOUIRE THAT CH ANGEtSi BE M ADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC? C vES I NO ,
l LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MACE:
4 1
l i
3 CETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVO'.VED IS AN UNREVIEVvED S AFETY OUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GUICELINES; (A) HAS THE PROB ABILITY OF OOCURRENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACC: CENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPVENT l IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREN'OUSLY EVALU ATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED? ,
C YES T NO STATE BASIS IhiS iS 3 Cold ChEChQMt Which doeSn't recuire l any Special equipment / System line up. It will not CauSe Or prevent the Operation Of any equiprrent.
(B) HAS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACClCENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DiFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREVIOUSLY [
IN THE FS AR BEEN CREATED? C YES O NO STATE BASISjee 3 A. l t
r i
ICI H AS THE M ARGIN( *FETY AS DEFINED IN THE B ASlJ FOR ANY TECHNtCAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR BEEN REQUCED' C YES 1 NO STATE B ASIS See 3A.
COES THE ACTINITY APPEAR TO INv0Ls E AN UNREVIEV.ED S AFETY OUESTION C YES 1 NO
~6 c AFETY SIGNif f C ANT C YES TN gy cl&%20..ry s .u .
h W;...
3/E 1 ApoROygo m r Y _cm . , . 0]_kMY,lWN, - -
e.
im iC13'2 C 3152
I FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR Gt:NERATING STATION PubllC d SOIVlCO! PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN / C@ TA C'f M 83~2 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NL PAM %
CATEGORY . t ' .e TYPE: C CN Overa:1 Z CN Submittal Other Yeti k' W Si i
Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously d;sturt.nl during site preparation. plant cor.struct;on or preuous plant meration? 7. Yes : No i State basis M d TM rdM (M .fs_4*d ~
[ [ d rM[J t%w__g__ _tA.egbd- i ls the activity required to achies e comp! ance with Federal. State or local environmental regulations? Z Yes 3 No I AppUcable Regulat.ons l %C TE tr e t~er vs.ws > es t~e a.t . tv oces not :n> c se an uveve+ed envronmental c eston S gn ed date r~e cr m trter~ esares a e No.
l t*'e J:rvry I'as r?e C: rent al r r C'ett ^y on un? evened envronme"tst nest on Ccme ere r~e rema'ncer et r~ s estuar.cn term l EVALUATION (Use edditionalsheetsif required) -
1.
Is the activity identified in the ' nal environmental statement (FES) Z Yes Z No
, Or Supplementary Environmuotal Documents (See O 3P Ident.fy documents and document sections reviewed ._.,
I i
I ;
i
- 2. Determine whether or not the act:utv insolsed is an unrewewed enwrenmental question using the foHowing gudel nes. !
l (if the answer to any of the fo:!owing quest: ens is Yes. then this actn ity involves an unreweaed e. vironmen*al ;
i quest on.)
(A) Will this activity resu.! in a s.gnificant increase in any adSerse environmental impact previously esaluated in the FES7 Z Yes Z No State bas:s 1 _
i
) (B) Wdi this activity result in a s:gnificant cnange in the t3 pes. or a signif. cant increase in the amot -'s oi effluents. or 1 l s gnif. cant increase in the authorized poner lesel? Z Yes Z No I State bas.s . _ _ _ _ . .
1 1 ,
i 1
- i
! (Cl Coes th's act:vit, involve an enwronmental matter not preuously reuewed and evaluated in the FES) l T Yes T No State basis l l
i 1 i, 1 Does the actrut3 in.otse an unrewenec enurenmental quest;on) T Yes Z No j l J 8v Approved y M(h '$ _$ I?_
l
- v. c..<<>. _
.6--. ,--
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC SerVjCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of /
l Equ4pment Number C c T- 7 / 8 3 7 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Equioment Name 0 & M Manual Equipment Location 2 -(0 G% N-( /2 ~ SSR No.
Insoection Type C t- T NCR No. 1 -/ v- t 7 t/f_
Work to be Performed ,o a.gco u a c _ 7~ _ CWP No. V (- > & /
Other CC r- 2 2 21 - 1 CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT r>p 24 _.14 /.4 CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAUBRATION QC ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE I ! - I I if I i ,,
IV n '
fl I l l I / i !
l / I i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA 1 A/F i A/L i QC i I, I i l / ! i I ,, - / ! I I i Al,4 / i i i l - l l !
V i i i
/ i i l i
/ i l i i Verify Proper Material Cont ol For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
i i l i i I Quality Control Actions Utilized (Checki:
C Stop Work C NCR C CAR C Tagged Comments 1/ s. v.Lf r
- A t %s '- h > ? # ~ '-
't* C W A' $ d -3 6 / " 'Y C~s :~ V.< t9 t's w J L + s A a C. _ i rswe < T s%. s 1 A ff '
agj g 17 JL ,. u 2/-
CmlGC< J S%,n S?! e,/: C r r - A l f 't - 1.r e;N v'.v ic,i A n r,c us7 it -
/
is.
/
2,
</
9 a-t <
t-i
. /j J O_.[ra ri c fb sa .?$Wiu!,
j 3/tu/[F3 .
r
.=
'7~&/$ (YT / $ CCj*t/WF/F R-J V-9'? A, 8' inspection (s) / Test (s) Comoleted Satisfacto v. EM Z No if NO. explain and reference aophcable documents in comment section.
Inspected By . / / .,o ----- Date .7 / Y- / )
m .s. ,, - m, - '
I '; FT-2283-2 7 Page 1 of 3 x/ , Pubile FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
' SerVICOS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: 8 FT O CCT O T-Test CWP 86-261 Prepared BykSldM 3/n/A;L. Reviewed By: 3 h7 (Preparer)F (Gat 6)~ (Supervisor) (Date)
Safety / Environmental 8 Yes 8 7//7/87 Evaluation Required: -/ 7 No TNoclear Li'c. f/O erations '( Da t'e)
Review / Concurrence: < < / _' //#7
-(QA Services F (tate)
Safety / Environmental Evaluation Concurrence: Md (Technicai Services) 7' /3^ 07 (Date)
PORC Review Required: 8 Yes O No E:716 MAR 131987 NFSC Review Required: O Yes 8 No NFSC #:
Aut'norized for Use: _#f[yM~ / _?/n/p3 (Appropriate NPD Supt. - FT/CCT) (0 ate)
(Station Manager - T-Test)
Permission to Initiate 8 -
Test: __ < / 6 / V- 9 7 (Snif t Suffrvisor) (0 ate)
Test Completed: m Ti b. E/W (Test ConcuctoV) /(Date)
Inspection Completed: [/ 3 -3e-P 7 (QA S rvi s) (0 te)
Supervisor Review: I 70!F 7
~(Cepartment Sucerlisor) (Date)
Notification of Test ] f ,
Completion and Results: < /d l
- 3 'JO -7 7
( hift Supervisor) (Date) 10CFR 50.59 Review:
(T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (0 ate) scwo>m = ws
M '
FT-2283-2 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 3GIVlCe* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST 1.1 CWP 86-261 for CN-2283 completes the Electrical Tie-In's at I-10 and Bldg. #10, Lyl . #5 for CN-2283/CWP 86-260.
2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT:
P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians _
Operations Results P Other 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/CWP.
2.3 Uil2ss otherwise noted, all numerical values have a tolerance of 10%.
3.0 PRERE0'JILITES 3.1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date 3.2 References CN-2283. CWP 86-260
~
FomVt01272 22 YA3
( -
FT-2283-2 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION O SerVlCO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO O
4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 4.1 Department Approval sh/r7 Dept. Supervisor Date 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: NumberN/A 4.3 Radiation Work Permit Issued, if required: Number M 4 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The following steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential, and they do not by pass a QC Hold Point.
OC 5.1 -All DR's to the CWP being tested have been WITNESS reviewed and are covered by this FT. List P OINT F.M..h. !JWP DR's reviewed: % - 2 (o l A
,., INSPECTOR l
s C Init. te Zi WITNES' , ;{3 >
E0JNI 2.-Verify that FT-2283 has been satisf actorily L. _. JNSPECTCR completed.
- 45. / Mat /gp Init. / Oc/te 5.3 Make a cocy of the Test Equipment Section (3.1), include the FT #, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used, N/A this step.
h &.
FCRY t0)372 22 %O
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
) Service ~ CN/TCR/SCR/PCh NO. r T 2 Le 3-t--
SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE M CATEGOJtY TYPE:
O CN OVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL C SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT E TEST REQUEST U TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEMIS) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT:
CLASSI d YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD C YES @ NO SAFE SHUTDOWN 3 YES C NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM E YES C NO S AFETY RELATED $ YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES b NO REVARKS 6a eh c.va!Ub-a bl F-T -7 ? 9 3 e n p r-s b .
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS. COMPONENTS, EQUIPMENT, TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? 3 YES C NO LI T THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED: E Ad I11 l'N7.IM1 b U 1.7.I 7 $.f.2.i7i,0.213 l 2 , 2 't t t '2. , n
.- . 2 . C,.
( L .9,. 9, / l ,. I W,1 i
etD, reullt B .' r.1 C ebb .
Y S. WD Y.f ? > Y. Y* s o f, h. Y .
<a s.v>) 5.v.1, s&', s . t e'. a
- 2. DCES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CHANGE (S) BE MADE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? O YES h NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE.
3 OETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION Ui'LIZ:NG THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES:
lA) H AS THE PRCBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE 04 THE CONSEQUENCEF OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPMENT IMPORT AN T TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BEENINCREASED)
C ES [N STATE SIS: l b N-22 N b2 u .uh b+ rws t A // w bc Y Ass nIqs U,hrstL&zf, W
Alb Min W ln
, -- Y 1p E nd. O (B) HAS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DiFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREVIOUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED? O YES QNO STATE B ASIS: )
,n Df.
l (C) H AS THE VARGIN OF SAFETY, AS DEFINED IN THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FS AR BEEN REDUCED) '
C YES 2 NO STATE BASIS: lo- fM-DOES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO. INV LVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION C YES E NO BY //
saAso M8 - /
~ co t, PPROVED -
' swpt, N __ I cas Fow 'C. 3'? C2 3382
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerylCO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CN NO.
/ F@ Til T- t z. e r . :.
PAGE %
CATEGORY TYPE: O CN Overall O CN Submittal Other Tes4 h_v .s i Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? 25 Yes C No State basis
/0 J& cla af -fLJ o . A&U id0 S-< Ah8 '"b e
&kN 4uf e&su v u o l
is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? E Yes 2 No Applicable Regulations NOTE: If e tner ansseris Yes. the actvry 1oes notinvoise a unre. esed environmental quest on. S,gn and date the form. If totn anssers are No.
the actry..y has the potent.al for creat:ng an unrev.esed en seronmental question. Como:ete the remarncer of this evaluat on form.
l EVALUATION . (Use additional sheets if required) 1.
Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) O Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Occuments (See Q 3)?
Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involvec is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
lif the answer to any of the fol!owing quest;ons is Yes. then this activity involves an unreviewed eavironmental questionJ (A) Will this activity result in a s'gnificent increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes Z No State basis i
(B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increa<e in the authorized po Aer level) Yes : No State basis (C) Does this activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES ?
Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity involve an unreviewed environmental question) Z Yes : No By
- m. . . . <
Approved
.nj .. M d _7 1,62_
l 6cw 2 7. ;4 4J10 NJ l
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) $0fVlCet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of I Ecwom ent Number 6 L R Di e, REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecuipment Name 7 QT fu> I G 7 4"uv ~~ '
0 Et M Manual Equipment locat:en 6hE( j' SSR No.
Inspect:en Type 8T NCR No.
Work to be Performed 7T. 4 # 7 7 - 3L CWP No. 6'6-86/
Other ,[Pd 27 4- >
CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION !
CALIBRATED OC ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE i 7 !
i M4 M l i / I l i ,/ i i i [ l i DIMCNSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT l CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i QC l l f' l l l l/ I i
! / I '
i / i i i .,/ \ l l l P' I I i I ,/ l (
4 I I
_ _ i_ __
Verdy Proper Material Control For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
1 I I i i I Quality Control Act;ons Utilized (Check):
C StopWork C NCR O CAR C Tagged Comments 1/M if t + d Gf ad's C/ 2 S.1 2 t' f7- ? ? ]3 - )
3
&~ G.,y,l l' ,
FTuc~/WA
~
1 l
f I i 1
I i
i l Inspection (s) / T4 Completed Satisfactory. CA/es Z No l
If NO explain arb reference applicable documents in comment section.
Inspected By ! E __ Date 3- 3 A[ D l 1 som e m usw
i .
FT-2283
~
pub llCi FORT ST." VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION service
- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO C_ce P*% - RG D
'FD7 % -isse TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM %26-p_g Type: 8 FT O CCT O T-Test Prepared Bykd,G. ,h./gy Reviewed By: . M /-2 7-( 2 (Preparer)) (Date) Supervisor) (Date)
Review / Concurrence: for e k A b d ., W #-r7+9
((QA Services) (Date)
Safety / Environmental 8 Yes Evaluation P.equired: O No / g z[2[97
~
u lear Lic.0- Operations) (Date)
/
Safety / Environmental A Evaluation Concurrence: _
(2M 2 4326 9-S-?7 _
(Technical Services) (0 ate)
PORC Review Pequired: L_ (es O No PORCl j$)RC 711 FEB - E 1987 NFSC Review Reqcired: -7 0 Yes q / 'nRES #:
Authorized for Use: uw . Wu _d.A 9[6[F7 (Station Manager) (Date)
** ** I" g ,; l Q ,7 p.j.w. f -,
(ShiftJuperviror) (Date)
Test Completed: x b t</30/W (Test ConductcY)' / (Date)~
Inspection Completed: [/ ;
~
3/3dT P (QA Services) / (Date)
Supervisor Review: Mdu.[/M
'(Kepartment $1)pervisor) j I/
'(Date)
Notification of Test /
Completion and Results: r[_k/<A 7- % #7 (Shift Supervisor) (L'a'.e) 10 CFR 50.59 Review:
(T-Test only) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date)
FOAM tot 372 22 241
FT-2283 pub llC FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
,. SerVlCO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
(
1.0 PURPOSE OF TEST .
1.1 This test will verify correct operation of SLRDIS Racks, I-93543 and I-93544.
2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for FT:
P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians Operations Results P Other 2.2 Notify Technical Services of any test / experiment procedure changes which could affect plant operating procedures upon completion of the CN/CWP.
2.3 Unless otherwise noted, all numerical values have a tolerance of i 19%.
3.0 PRERE0VISITES 3.1 Test Equipment i
Last Calibration Name Identification No. Date Hand Held 2-Way Plant Radio T)I6N M -@% '
/ - ? - 4 '7- .
3'. 2 References V/P l
FopM101372 22 360
'. ~
FT-2283
, Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
. SerVlCe* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 4.1 Department Approval b / $3-@8[
ept@p6rvisor y Date 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required: Number A//P 4.3 Radiation Work Permit Issued, if required: Number /P 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The following steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential, and they do not by pass a QC Hold Point.
5.1 All DR's to the CWP being tested have been Z reviewed and are covered by this FT. Li st
)../.'[;j
' 7 CWP DR's reviewed: Ato. h D A-T s u E .
r:OINT EER 6fo-94 A41 2u 4 "d
- 8/o - A 0 B A TWu% Cj % ,
QC WITNESS Init.'l Y YEY Mte WENR Y %.2 \ eri fy that CR 5.4.1.3.8a-R, SR 6. 4.1.3.8b-R, SR 5.4.1.3.8c;-R, and SR 5.4.1.1.8d-R have been satisfactorily cor.pleted.
[b-5.3 Verify ttat selector keys on I-93543 are set to INHIBIT.
B 5.4 Verify that selector keys on I-93544 are set '
to INHIBIT.
h 5.5 Set selector keys on I-93544 to the RUN mode.
C
, .-+ S.
l l
FOR44(ol372 22 31E3
/. s FT-2283 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SerVICG* PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 5.6 Verify the NORMAL mode indicator lights ON for all detectTenVracks on I-93544. Re-set if necessary.L, M /c hSV $93 5.7 Verify the TEST mode indicator lights ON for all detection racks on I-93543.
$% =
5.8 Open rear access door on I-93544.
Es.
5.9 Standing directly in 'ront of I-93544, place a hand held 2-way in plasie radio close to the instrument panel and depress the transmit button, holding it down for 5 seconds.
QC ['g, WITNE is POINT gh /S. 5.10 Verify that SLRDIS TRIP does NOT occur on INSPECTOR I-93544.
f &-
NOTE: If SLRDIS TRIP does occur, discontinun this 'D ygCg. .
test and write on SSR. 'T@if 5.11 Repeat Step 5.9 as necessary, moving the radio j .Y 7t h' '
transmitter around the perimeter of I-93544, verifying that a SLRDIS trip does not occur.
h' 5.12 Close rear access door on I-93544.
C QC <-4 . %
WITNESS DOINT . . .
. 82 'N5.13 Verify that all zones on rack I-93544 are NORMAL.
WITNES S h'
POINT ,.
J ,ff,-f7 5.14 Verify the TEST mode indicator lights ON for
' 5"E** all e te;tian racks on I-93543.
6Y'l'bf & '*
s s. y r/ m FORM tol372 22 3M3 ,
1 FT-22S3
. Page 5 of 7 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SOfVice* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 5.15 Turn power 0FF, then ON for rack I-93544 (breaker is located in 480V Room, Lvl. 5, Sec. 10).
QC C '
WITNESS POINT [ff,j,.,[yf,,j2. 5.16 Verify that SLRDIS TRIP does not occur on INSPECTOR I-93540 S.
5.17 Set selector keys in I-93544 to the INHIBIT mode.
Qc 5.18 Re-set selector keys on I-93543 to RUN.
WITNESS
'N' #f. 22t:..y
[G '
NspfCTOR 5.19 Verify that all zones on I-93543 are NORMAL.
Re-set if necessary.
CC ffr .
WITNESS f POINT //f,J ,-fy,,,ff 5.20 Verify the TEST mode indicator lights ON for
*l vsFEcTon all * - ' N racks on I-93544.
Lt41K - r VV&B7-I312. 4 Y-5.21 OpenErear S. Yacc/gr N
ess doer on I-93543.
S V-5.22 Standing directly in front of I-93543, place a hand held 2-way in plant radio close to the instrument panel and depress the transmit button, holding it down for 5 seconds.
TNES jV 3 /V #
POINT ./ p 5.23 hat a SLRDIS TRIP does @ T occur on FORM (Ol372 22 3H3
- ri aca Page 6 of 7 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
, SOfVlCO* PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NOTE: If SLRDIS TRIP does occur, discontinue this test and write an SSR.
5.24 Repeat Ster 5.22 as necessary, moving the radio transmitter around the perimeter of I-93543, verifying that a SLRDIS TRIP does not occur.
G5r.
5.25 Close rear access door on I-93543.
h-5.26 Verify that all zones on rack I-93543 are NORMAL.
QC WITNESS
[' Q' -
'WT -
I:lUf75.27 Verify the TEST mode indicator lights ON for W PECTOR all dc* ...;6 racks on I-93544.
L. ode o c.
N 3D L hT.
Vi3/B 7-5.28 Turn power OFF, then ON for rack I-93543 (Breaker is located in 480V Room, Lyl. 5, Sec. 10).
Qc WITNE" 5.29 f that a SLRDIS TRIP does not +ccur on POINT [IJ -/%y IN5PECTOR QC m r O' WITNESS M POINT ,,)).'f,,)f.91 14sPECTCR 5.30 Verify that all zones on I-93543 are NORMAL.
h.
5.31 Re-set selector keys in I-93543 to INHIBIT.
WITNESS g, 'S~
POINT //7.446,f 7 5.32 Verify the TEST Mode indicator lights ON for W ECTOR all detection racks on I-93543 and I-93544 5 32./ R D 37 -(386 M_ C S32'.2 V D(2 * '59.-l38b $f, , '
5.33 Return system to Operations.
~
T5' FoRMio1772.u 3643
FT-22e3 A Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
. 507 Service
- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 5.34 Make a copy of the Test Equipment Section (3.1), include the FT #, and send it to the Results Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used, N/A this step.
b< 4 O
s l
F0mM(01372 22 3643 ,
4 Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 0SerVlCOw PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCh NO. 7:'7 -22 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE /<4 CATEGORY -
TYPE:
C CN OVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL SETPOINT CHANGE REPORT S TESTREQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGUR ATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE (FSAR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM (S) EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT:
CLASSI $ YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD YES 8 NO SAFE SHUTDOWN 8.YES U NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM X)YES C NO S AFETY R ELATED 8 YES C NO SECURITY SYSTEM C YES Z NO REMARKS b 77"1"f_d L [ dthQ f > <t 1 fj 2"9.3 d _f 2* NS W EVAt.UATION 44se Additiornal Sheets If Required
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, EQUIPMENT. TESTS, EXPERIMENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBEDIN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS? E YES U NO LIST THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS REVIEWED:_bb 3 ((2 / 4. S . / 4. b . 9. /
- 3. W. ) . 'l W Z . So ?. . R. 5 _ W 2h , TC. ? . ~l. ]
/5 l . d. > r /. '\L //. 12 .
- 21. A ~1 2 s'- 7un k p cts L C. O %', 0. / 4,4.2. 4. c . /.
+- 'sR S.L / ' ' s Y $ d. )'
- 2. DOES THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE THAT CH ANGEIS) BE M ADE TO THE FS AR OR TECH SPEC 7 C YES M NO LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
- 3. DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING GU'DELINES:
(Al HAS THE PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OR THE CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED IN THE FSAR BEEN INCREASED)
U YES 2 NO STATE B AS;S: O /d' #D Lu M 7'E-/7 f /"AA# @- .C AJ oT_
1904}rrwil In 4 & Fs' AR ce 77ek 5N A n/G Po e part. <J. ,* A .g-P r* ix A c/o .4 es e n ,*n e :C & n< / A o 1, J m >,' ; r, cm. e n i > x.x _as,,
-14/ w l, A ~ / / e -A h e. 5LP ht*:
pm n2 (1/a L < Sr.- S i?
n:
__gg
._L s R u e s a_i,& - o z.q 'e-4, A _ dec. M m,,,,a-r-ra>n,e hie a re.s vej er- w& ust. g/ 2/ANh W.Lp 2ADmi /A.d?;;5 ' nom) $ 7HG- @ZgQ/
2cvM .).ru Abbtp7cn 7H62 Aces totLi 86 cyeL&b onf oM" (8) HAS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN ANY EVALUATED PREVIOUSLY IN THE FSAR BEEN CREATED 7 C YES X NO STATE BASIS: N("* )/,(M* 1.sr D6uZ"/.
S W u& u s t_% AD h THf. 5 L'kh /s F A tk ) Li G-T~ s Art- Af-in r3 _A4e31s>=rt t e-h i
*1"d f- f"., F L TT' A ~72)P s /f 13AL /5 d /.D d- t347f-h .
l (C) H AS THE M ARGIN OF S AFETY, AS DEFIN;D IN THE B ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FS AR BE N REDUCED' C YES STATE BASIS. Y#- An r man c -/ /> 6 Av. c -,/- /s *1t /7'd_ .mM.
J14 iwwrl2 NOl M</ia w r_nn.htIi s
/ Isle '
^75f-Msw x rare- f ara e, g %
n i ,.
A n e % ,a / + d 1 4 ,o a t +r> os atbikrws oe i& . e,_,_
_ un - spu etieets L4 Trip esus y A to p e, e o n d / J , a . \/se,y'v yzi1.z c e era 2-
- ww_4L n G +Lu <:: w s rs.A tse e- x u e r ? e w o e + T v e % ao dh S M y b6CN @ ) o t'A 6 k A 5II kR. W AW L.) CMLi- T6:'.H MCS .
DOES THE ACT;VITY APPEIR 70. INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY CUESTION C YES 2$ NO C YES NP B Y_c.f__ .,.s...
7.
BE SAFETYNSIGP m
1FICANT22_
APPROVED Y,g,, /m .. . r
^
.m D
Ce,ww TM G LL . . .- ; /, /n w ma n: -
(J
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerVICet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN I W ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. 4r4 P3 PAGE /M4/
CATEGORY -
TYPE: 2 CN Overall G CN Submittal Other I~I- 2 2 I3 Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously disturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? E Yes C No State basis A&,v<> Wu ne ccxAnnb w vn+
c ano t.
Ro S .
Is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal, State or local environmental regulations? O Yes j No Applicable Regulations i l
NO TE. If e ther ansaer is Yes, the actwty aces r at invcive an unrev>ewed environtrentalcuest:cn. Sign and date the form. If both answers are No, \
the activrty has the cctent;at for crear.ng an unrevesed enstront'entalQuestcon. Cornoiete the rema<ncer of th?s esatuat:on form.
EVALUATION (Use additionalsheetsif required) ,
1.
Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) O Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q 3)?
Identify documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity itivolved is an unreviewed environmental question using the following guidelines.
(If the answer to any of the following questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.)
(A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the l FES? Z Yes Z No State basis (B) Will this activity result in a significant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluen'.s or a significant increase in the authorized power fevel? Yes E No State basis (C) Does tnis activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES?
Z Yes Z No State basis Does the activity invoNe an unreviewed environmental question? Z Yes : No B y __ _
t
_ _ ___ 2 OA?t.
Approved v F
5.y ? wat-
_L.
- A
#2 Se.-
+ a'2 ;4 4 P J c- -
.e.
O %n bf's
- FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION c '.' Public pg, Services PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO A7-I$fM l, '_, ;. PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE I OF 7>
PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. j TITLE FT l2M - I f.T. o AJ 6tR'b:s tac 6 T - M 5'/ 3 /bb T- 13 5 #(il p^ dNNO l CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO REASON FOR CHANGE 6 32.) Ihs> de,o sve.P. Foe E m rTi/67 nee tue us ' Rte <4<E meurec rs.
rn'STDf2 S E A DCd OA 6LE S. FEc,,u s CE o:ce (ADt E (p? y,.
SE^1TL'lFEE* EAc4 Ffrwu gy 5 y gpy <
F Ac70t? LPG 3 Pt tc E. > d tvA.
-7.3. vel?if / TH4 r SE.MScP d AB(Es LcE9E Fovu~0 7o /
Tt2 Oui 3E E l 4 tW d'oFF. DE f E f T '
- G N A * *' AU W, n e.tu,w i n .
. s Plir Gs (TUTf'2 0
- T1M 04 0'
*jpyg ., '
,p ouny ).TESElf/E/15MFE u ucnEv 6b V'/ 6 697'1 FLE x 'LV qqs runor AcivPCP's SPocES
/Jors SEF 4774t terne AiT tud g e c e'E cta 0 6 (c o'l W V 0 Y FeeLerATica/$tfFAnl ~43 sn p uutt vCV,F i ~inE censcu came. m , < e s ~ w %,0. u, ,5
<frM,o d f h3t E $ . T ttG I UTE M C r F 7 Ht 5 fE .'s do7 e //4 4 G D
((7 h T1/?C D iA.) M '[ LOA
. . ,/ 7 i' YES O NO IS P%OCEDURE PORC AhPROVED? DEVIATION CATEGORY: O TEVPOR ARY IS!NGLE USE) 2,YES C NO i3 20 REVIEW REOU6AED? O LONG TERM TEMPCRARY - EXP,, iS 2" YES C NO IS QC REVIEW REOViRE0? C PERMANENT.OCCF ATTACHED C 00R OCR ATTACHED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED 4 , SUPERVISOR'S $1GN ATURE) 10 ATE)
EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL tRECutRED FCR ALL MAINTENA%CE. RESUL TS. TECHMf.AL SPEUFICATION SURVEllLANCE. ANO ADMiNISTRA TIVE PROCEDURES 1 y ^ v
(/ / OATE QUAUTY CONTROL APPROVAL {i M}
IREQUIREO If WORK REculRES QC CR INvCEVES TISTING OR MAIN ANAnCE CN SAFETY RELA TED EQuiPYE4T1 APPR e VALS l
PLANT MANAGEMENJ TAFF\ pi vATE PLANT MANAGEMENT ST AFF . SRO DATE
-/ f 0 R ES PONSiBLE FOR PERSdN / CATE PROCEDUPE AUTHOR!ZER DATE
/
PORC MEETING NLY8ER CATE l
EATENOED UPiRATiON RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE D ATE:'
PORC MEETING NLM8ER DATE u T ENDED UP!RA TION RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE DATE.
PORC MEETING NVYBER DATE u TENCEO UPiRA T40N PESPONS.8LE FOR PERSON DATE l
j DATE:
PORC MEETING NLYBER DATE L . - - ..
_ . m R . .:.. . .R m m C.g,- AT.g. .. ..m.. . . . u. .
..,g,.,, ,, . R ,
, , ,g S, .
f .- .s
^ r k' .
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
- / Public pg, gg.
. SerYlCOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO E7 1362 PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE b O F _ 7. -
ISSUE NO.
DURE NO.
Tlb cd '5/PDs9 PR -
- 116'5 - R'Ar A T "i % 5 5/W I T-7 3 59'y Mk CHANGED FROM CHANGEDTO REASON FOR CHANGE G/' 5. M . 2-$bb Aleu) Sr6P Fee e A< 4 raem irne et , G ur<c,, e ce E. 4. r. s . b !
4GMTT.] HEAT A Perma e f T3 - R y go, qE,M 1 ,ae T4E tto*,ef OAPJtG o r7T+ A Coff E r T r fE F AT7 6 d " F TM FLpr*&LEss HGM Aud. NEM1 g g p pg g mg g 'Rg et b . cut t*p FY5 u '
A TEryfe#A*TvFE / core A77e4 e F HE SLfD'S RA3'5.7 M '7El e d T itf FE ,PE r 7 V G dt trTT7e l LuiLL VE RiF Y 9 8tE cPE N9et d y 9 kt 4 - S te% % s sTsP toiT4 5.% / Fev E Ac 4 e r $t t& s 7Ac<slCFincr? f)N
,4 ws t* 4 FA e ei '/ . _s pff sO TE N SEnsce O Ast e .
or 7m1 1657 J S Aje7 NOR weruE55 org }}cTE REh o^) A%Y w A y, Q
w/n G6 i
!/Y[$7 2 YES C NO is PROCEDURE PORh APPROVEO? DEVIATION CATEGORY: '.'r TEMPOR ARY ISINGLE USE) i" YES C NO IS EO REVIEW R EQUIRE0? C LONG TERM TEMPORARY . EXP)RES 2 YES C NO IS OC REVIEW R EQUIRE0? , C PERVANENT DCCF ATTACHED ,
APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED ~
7 tSUPERvlSOR'S SIGN ATURE) (DATEl l EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL / '
7 ,-
N
~
! tRECuiRED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICA TION SUMEILLANCE. AND AD%NISTRATIVE PROCEDURESI QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL n IREQU!REO If WORK RECulRES QC CR INVOLVES TESTING CR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED ECUIPVENTI "D
- l?
b APPR
- VALS
~
.S T AH DATE PLANT M ANAGEMENT STAFF . SRO DATE PLAnf MANAGEYdEN%
RESPONSIBLE OR RSON 4w-U.4 VA -
U s /.vls)
DATE W 2a m PROCEDURE AUTHORIZER (/
2 -i y-n OATE
~
~// (/b .NS POR C MEETING Nvv8ER 3hh] Y k kt &f V OATE BWD '
EATEN IED EXPtRATION RESPONSIBLE FCR PERSON DATE DATE.
PORC MEETING NVV8 ER DATE ExTENOiO ExPtRAT QN RESPONSi8LE FCR PERSON DATE c OATE.
! DATE PORC MEETING NUMBER LA T E NC E O LAPiR A riON RESPONSIBLE FCR PERSON DATE DATE.
PORC MEETING NVM8ER DATE
- a m nr.a5 iNmATO .rCo.saa : ce c. sat TO aca: Cuar mAew cC.w 0 P.-:r:,et sE.sn :EvuTED 0%E, eC, Es cCa esE iS sE:tsS u
3, /,1 t i...., ,
,'/ ,
e FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
/. Public . pg, ,O.
l SerVlC05 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO 67- /37t l 3
1 PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE / OF- 7m V PROCEDURE NO. ISSUE NO. TITLE ET c A/ M/% <. 7Acr'< T 73 W% > T-7 3 T t/ 8/
f FT-1"Z-B F -
$$N# / CHANGED FROM CH ANG ED TO REASON FOR CHANGE 5.& C U)l? tTT6A] . . . l I & 97 $ 0 A) %eQ &c% paprn7 LO4rc 'i?Acr5 g .. kkd GPE('PE D 8CEst Vf+:,u)nc a AcTt> ATE) > Ab)oV;fi Y'MN . . . . Ll (.,1pT c. Fo oc"n tM fc AIIPcM ~[HE
& %R k ccy c &gg _
lCh'C ~RAc G M' f. WE
= , u 'T nT o r 7 w, P T ,S lG,)] mbt ALTEM b b 2 0**!h % fb h b LL)R< TTEN .
L.u6tws ed kV ALL s a rw f w A V.
uc c, uc. R>c c o n . . .
S/5."10 A 5 WR i rTEd
.. . Li G iP Is o M Fer/ALL l.06 I c. TAces o Aj ..
- 6. GL'? AS W ei TTEd Lis s7s on FeR A LL mitPAws04- .
iN4 TI A TO R nAig vW } A JAi n &. I fh 3 YES C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APdRONE0? CEVIADON CATEGORY: 7TEMPOR AR'. (SlNGLE USD 2 YES C NO IS EO REVIEW REOU'AEO? C LONG TERM TEVPORARY EXPIRES 7YES C NO id QC REVIEW REQuiR EC? C PERMANENT 0CCF ATTACHED C 00R OCR ATTACHED APPROVEO/ PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHANGED (SUPERVISOR S SIGNATURO (OATO EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL ~
tREQU: RED FOR ALL MAWTENANCE. RESUL TS, TECHNICAL S!tbitCA NON SuR/EILLANCE. AND ACMWlSTRA TNE PROCEDURES) 7d f k >
,g' DATE QUAllW CONTROL APPROVAL' /"
(REQU. RED W HDRK REQUIRES CC OR dv0NSt68 TING 0RGA.NTE MANCE CN SAFETY RELA TED EQUWMENT)
APPR e VALS DATE PLANI MANAGEMENT p. p QATE PLANT MANAGEMENT STAFF SRO RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON OATE PROCEDURE AUTHOR 12ER DATE PORC MEETING NvM8ER DATE UTENCEO EAPIRAT6CN RESPONS18LE FOR PERSON DATE DATE.
PORC MEETtNG NUMB ER DATE U T ENDED UP:RA TsON RESPONSIBLE FOR PE ASON DATE DATE.
g PORC ME ETING NLMB ER DATE
, {
V' U TE%DEO uptpA 7,09 pgSppyg,gLL,cq ,LA$0N DATE l OATE:
PORC ME ETING Nt.,M8 ER DATE IP fT1 ATOR.FCRWARD CGA AL To aceC %E*r ATT ACP CCpY in '#OCEDURE 98 NG CEV AT80 OTwf R CCP ES FOR JSE AS NEC:SS Aa,
_ 7_' r2 D 33R5
.,i..
S f.' d
! pyhllg FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION pg, gg, SOfVICOs PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO M -/3(TL
) PROCEDURE DEVIATION REPORT PAGE 7- OF Z-PROCEDUR E NO. ISSUE NO. TITLL ' -
CT 776% -
F I. m 4 (9b < 24 < < q 'TeTM% 9 3 -1% 5N r
ydN9s6( CHANGED FROM CHANGED TO 'R tASON FOR CHANGE Nk'& lI& W C l /\l Eht?ba
^
.) b >
Lo6,c mees ca. -
. . N s
**w w .
s
- u'< e.
! ,. l W $-l ~) hh S C NO IS PROCEDURE PORC APPRONE07 DW1ATION CATEGORY: MEMPORARY ISINGLE USE)
S C NO IS EQ REVIEW REQUIREO) C LONG TEAM TEMPORARY EXPIRES
_ YES C NO IS QC REVIEW REQUlREO? C PER4tANE%DCCF ATTAGNED APPROVED / PROCEDURE INTENT NOT CHAWGED ^7 (SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE /
dMI _
3 Y/I7 IDATEl DATE EQ REVIEWER APPROVAL IREQUIRED FOR ALL MAINTENANCE. RESUL TS. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEJLWCE. AND ADMINISTRA TIVE PR3CEDURES) l QUALITY CONTROL APPROVAL M 2- b , g7 iRECutREO IF WORK REQUIRES QC OR IM10L VES TESTING CR MAINTENANCE ON SAFETY RELA TED EQUIPMENTI APPR e VALS AF , DATE PLANT MANAGEMEN S T AFF . SMO DATE W2 ]. VAN AG EMLhN T6 3 et.ANI '
hF/Yk?[NI /x' / . !/ D ?- N-s'?
DATE OATE PROCEDURE A'UTHORIZER RE$f NSiB FO ERSv
~
h ,)Y 3 / '//I'l ! r l . . . VW :- M" M 6PORC MEET 4NG NUM8ER j CATE UTENOED UP RATlON
. RESPONSIBLE FOR PER SON CAiE DATE:
PORC YEETING NUVB ER DATE UT ENOED uP; RAT 60N RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON DATE D ATE.
g.
PORC MEETING NUMB ER DATE j
U TENCEO UPIR A TION RESPONSIBLE FOR PERSON QATE DATE:
PORC MEET 6NG NUM8 ER DATE r - 0 172 % r95 WmATom. scow Ame Ce G NAL to vaC C'.E8r. AT'ACH CCPv 'O P90CE%f f $1'<G SEVIATf D CTHER CCP ES FCR '.SE AS NECESS AR*
4 -
CN 2283 BV R.Atkisson PAGE B9 FQaw MC. 372 30 2650 l
l l
1 T E 93941 TE 93948 T.. &
TE 93949 ['$.
s ,. , ' '1 N
TE b -93947 i lj @
T E-9 3940 % , j .
l T E-93938 , REK, tor B,LD6 2 cut 1 p\ ,
fuAct,og l l l TE-93939 -
TE-9394G -
SLRDIS PURS
- TE 939N. U @= covrit.o t. Room 1 I-9 3 5 +5 TE-939p '
~I.q3544 3
h LOOP l SEW 50RS T E -9 39 5 3 ----- totf TAG WVMBERS LGOP 2 SDr50RS
*EVEW TAG WMBERS TE-93942 :s T E-9399q -
- "E
' TE-93951 '8 @
> TUReim BLDG 70E E
._. g L j
@ \
TE 93943 ,
TE-939 g-O @ @ 09 G @@ @
PL AN VIEW
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
, ) $3rylCO2 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page !of /
Ecu cment Numt:er $4pa/S .
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eau;oment Name 7 93.ft/3 x 9$ T 4L/ C 4TCCc'/dIfW t"Ja'/_T O & M Manual Equicment Location 6047404 Wr SSR No.
Inspectron Type p'7 7 / 9'7 NCR No.
Work to be Performed p 'T'2 2 b 7 CWP No. 'f 6 - 16 0 _
Other NT f & 6 5 CAllBRATED EQUIPMENT po,( 97-/J08 CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllB RATION #
ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE OC #1'# # 7 - #l 9 2' Jhs<js t1 M '/73 6 1 /- ]-92 l s0/4 s i I
! ! i N ., , 4,v 1
, 4,1 y ,Ay,_ i I I IN DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT I CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i OC
~ l ! ! !7 N ! I '
A N I I I f' I X ! ! / I
!N i/. !/ !
% A J /i f G 'l'V- b 7 / l
\ 'VI /I I N ~
i / i i Verify Prnoer Material Contrcl For Job. List Applicable DC Numbers Below:
i i i i I i Guahty Control Actions UUted (Check):
O Stoo Wo*k C NCR O CAR C Tagged Comments t/scrir//>> 7,u c f,,sf,,,,, g g;ypg a f, ), (*, j g) _ $~ jji, (, Jt) g,,'l (_ ,J}
$< L 5 C, /9 T. 29 f. < N/ Ci 'W / / ' '
'[i 2/2 .
r!wnw 1%'< h / fV C< Foi- ?HEFbdruk mu mu;t.rc fcren r,sp./c c._u. Q yn 9 3 9$ 9 rf' O 9 W 7F 9s 9'y'*1 TK 9$ 9 7QRr 3 W 75 19W YE" S3. W? '
I *! # '
~
l
-r" 9 C 9 9 ,5 . 9 W a 771i;uio' h,.
r# <> 9
..$ 0o- A ,u $, ,/$: .
Ihni cir,_r 90/? 91 -11 M u frrf F.l t , f (, Q ?, 7 77/sr E Lars,m' myk A A rin~AMi* v '7T 9 3 9 W TJ~ 954v#2, rr 4 2 4 r) -tr G C offs M *? $ 9 ts(s A > qs _. _
$ b - 9 5~ S /Ll07r 1r 9 '14 2*L t.A < rsu$n Acc rAJ 4 t z. u t y. r~ntn Njx t s ~t rn" >'~t h'A*
ts G~sff 47/JP?t a.<* on .t'At>f _s tn tvi t s A 4 4,f i trC,e f~b teurn H)w .f/~ MAL A >< A n AC/- &citif tustr cn tm.6 [/>TV 9 . 9t/1. A oA tw it t Ad* ur747h*
17/ AFA /%~ ->~Zt/1 t~A.CLJ~_
W s 'T)it e DCs ~'
Inspection (s) / Test (s) Completed Satisfactory. / Yes Z No if NO. evolain and reference aophcable documents in comrhent section. A_ )
Inspected Byj <( * /4 Date -/ O
, o. ., . . , m = w
FORT ST VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION PubilC SerVICO5 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO QC INSPECTION REPORT Page / of /
Eauipment Number 6 / R hie REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Eauipment Name -r M qwz Pf g rq . C n ec.oo r* .h bs 0 & M Manual Equipment Location Inspection Type hm/1[' SSR No.
F T- NCR No.
Work to be Performeo {7. MS) CWP No. 86 4 (o Other ~FT 1 -iRT CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT On e_ 7 7,7 3 'y j '
CAllBRATED IDENTIFICATION CAllBRATION QC ##*O'3'*
ITEMS NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE i V l n i A- lI I - I i / I i
# I i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT CRITERIA l A/F l A/L i QC 1 - ! i I f I 1 I
! /
lum '/
,, . I I
l I
i I
/ 1 i
/ i ! l
/ I I I Verify Proper Material Control For Job. Ust Applicable DC Numbers Below:
i i i j i i
Quality Control Actions Utilized (Checki:
O Stopwork O NCR O CAR O Tagged Commerits en A Vs y/L /_ Lalast:, f*& p 9 P 3 C }},I fs Dlm.L TG -4 % '1 w 3
- c. il b V m,/ G , A y ? , n .4 ',L y" T / *, oss w
-- 4 pf) /
Insoection(s)(/ Testis (Completed Satisf actory. (Yes .Z No if NO. explainMeference apphcable documents in comment section.
Inspected By _X Dats _3i3 a -y 7 cCM.s 2,1?2 :: m1
t /
.. 5W, 3 ' i) CCT-2283 4 Public ' . , . FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 1 of 4
% e
. SerylCO*
- PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO i N '. e w(&. go fn.
ggf O (o 9 7:of .. ~
TITLE: TEST CONTROL FORM Type: ;O FT / F CCT O T-Test :
1 Ccoe K- M I .
.v. .g. ,n4,l?
..y -
.v
- Wl7 'W
.p. .,"9'.y.
.y ~, : - 7, *
' . . . ; .< t% ;pp'
.. ;; j.
Prepared By: j] N/f/
(Preparer)M[04td) g Reviewed
.' W '
upervisor) By: (0 ate) p p
/ /Ikb)& ( hkd /
Review / Concurrence:
Poro dded M qQA Services) "
1P-16 q.(Date) 0Wp:
bd p $g
+
- 9. . . , e .d Wwr.
.r ; w ':,h,?.
. e; . -
Safety / Environmental Yes
.; ,.%.j:<1.#5lh
) j (';'yf;'
Evaluation Required: O No D. ,
6 ( N u ar Lic. - Op'erations) ...(Date) # *3 ,
u 7. ?fg4 ii.'d ~
Safety / Environmental - ' 'c' Evaluation Concurrence: O:t C / h M . d f) + G! ~ SS-E(7 " M M;D (TechnicaT9ervices) ., op;-(Date) ,t 5 ;l.g PORC Reviw Required: Yes O No P0nCERCh i S FFR .5 198h.
NFSC Review Required: ~7 Yes f
/v/
~
' z' Authorized for Use: .u -__ow ~ M/4 [M; (Cate)'T;;l
~
.(St pion Managee)~
/ .w A
, :' O Permission to Initiate / . '? '
.?
Test: // ).
'9tv-r Tupervisor)
$'ll' Yi '
! (Date)
Test Completed:
#/ . ; M NS /B 7-(Test Conductor)3 /(Ofte)
Inspection Completed: dd - 3 h
/' ( Services) (Oate)
Supervisor Review: , ,
a 2,/ NN g0e ..
e7visop (Date)
Notification of Test Completion and Results: .
/
~(Shift
- Supervisor) (0 ate) i 10 CFR 50.59 Review:
(T-Testonly) (Nuclear Lic. - Operations) (Date) l l
FCAMICi372 22 3643
*Y
- CCT-2283 s '. ., . , Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 2 of 4 SerVICG" PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO
(
i 1.0 PURp0SE OF TEST 1.1 To inspect CN changes and verify correctness of installation prior to executing FT.
2.0 PRECAUTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SPECIAL ASSISTANCE 2.1 Department (s) responsible for CCT
, P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Electricians p Operations Results S .
Other 2.2 This Cold Checkout Test (CCT) is performed as part of a Change Notice (CN) and requires no abnormal condition '
different from that of the CN and therefore no safety analysis is required.
. 2.3 Any steps that arte aat applicable may be marked N/A and initialed by test conductor.
3.0 PREREQUISITES, 3.1 Test Equipment Last Calibration Name Identificatnn ifo. Date VOM (A -3 / 0 5'
~
/L/ // ///o l /
3.2 References ,
4.0 AUTHORIZATIONS 4.1 Departmental Approval . 1 12-87 Dept. Superytsor Date 4.2 Mech /Elec Clearance Issued, if required Number A/ [h-
/
4.3 Radiation Work Permit Issued, if required Number AJ [l--
/'
FORMIC)372 22 3843
.' !>. CCT-2283 Page 3 of 4
. Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
- SOrVIC7" PUXLIC SERVICE COMPANY GF COLGRADD 5.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: The following steps may be performed in any order as long as they are functionally sequential, and they do not by pass a QC Hold Point.
5.1 All OR's to the CWP being tested have been gc reviewed and are covered by this CCT. List CWP OR's reviewed: # 6 -;;uoD A TWtu 7L E-zo 4 A WITNESS PolNTM 3./7/B7= 0" y,u 43 , g _ ghu h m fn jf4p S.g #b GS i sw!By QC Init. Date d WITNES!
POINT 133[7d25.2 Check all cables for proper terminations per
[' INSPEdTOR Wiring drawings.
j G%
Elec.
l QC WITNES{N.2]ff]5.3 POINT Spot check terminals for tightness. This shall i INSPECT R include both internal and external panel wiring.
89-Elec.
5.4 Check schematic drawings for fur.ctions of auxiliary contacts to prevent inadvertent operation of other energized equipment.
[Er-Ele:.
I 5.5 During circuit check, all contacts and conductors QC must be verified by closing, blocking or WITNES: i continuity check as the case may be. It must h.S 7/9/ G never be assumed that the relay is energized or PCINT[ y~g~CTOR deenergized because a circuit is open or closed.
It must be verified, hElec.
5.6 All parallel paths must be opened and each resultant series path checked individually, t
[S.
Elec.
FORM tC1372 22 3k3 . . _ . . . . . .
- r a
_r CCT-2283
, ... Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Page 4 of 4 service
- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADQ
[
's 5.7 Where wiring and contact arrangements do not meet CN criteria, the appropriate organization will be notified of the discrepancy and correction made before continuation of the CCT.
k LL uhRis EC3 Ester 4 hecommg, gg ..
We ep. qq n 5.8 Make a copy of the test equipment section (3.1),
, include the CCT#, and send it to the Rasults Engineering Supervisor. If no test equipment is used, consider this step N/A.
.G6 E/R 9
FORM C 372 22 3H3
a i
l FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STm.'lON Public
) Service ~ PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN/TCR/SCR/PCd NO. OOI- 2263 SAFETY EVALUATION PAGE 18 I CATEGORY .. .
TYPE:
C CN OVERALL C CN SUBMITTAL SETPOINT CH ANGE REPORT N TEST REQUEST C TEMPORARY CONFIGURATION REPORT C PROCEDURE CHANGE IFS AR) C OTHER CLASSIFICATION: ARE THE SYSTEM ($) EQUtr.YFNT OR STRUCTJP.ES INVOLVED, OR DOES THE ACTIVITY AFFECT:
CLASS I 3 YES C NO ENGINEERED SAFEGUARD C YEc SAFE SHUTDOWN 3 .ES U NO PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM YES
[NO L J NO SAFETY RE . D %YES . C NO SECURITY SYSTEM L YES %NO REMARKS .AL ui tu A f _ .- . N b k h) k_4-( Y " (T & d k N N M
- 1. DOES THIS ACTIVITY AFFECT STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS. COYPONENTS. EQUIPMENT. TESTS. FXPERIVENTS OR PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE FSAR OR TECH SPECS?
%YES C NO LIST THJEPPLICABLE SECTJONS REVIEWED:
YSA(% % dim L&'2d
- l. 2. 2- l 1. 4. E l. A i '
'G.
- 2 2 : 1. I 9. 2K7.' 7 4. ' ? 2.0 Y.2.S'? 2 N 'CI.lk'/d I AbrInJN b $ . 2.- #
(',d4 l n L 2 ' T IL u 2 ! i t- '74 L % ec' tce 4 4 ) 4 42. 4 &.) 4 g4 727 p.4,,
%7. ti"); $E'5'GlI fM 5.16 4
- 2. DCf 3 THE ACTIVITY REQUIRE TH AT CHANGEIS) BE MACE TO THE FSAR OR TECH SPEC? C YES 3 NO l LIST SECTIONS TO BE CHANGED AND THE CHANGES TO BE MADE:
do NM4 e$.
3 DETERMINE WHETHEP CR NOT THE ACTIVITY INVOLVEC IS AN UNREVIEWED S AFETY CUESTION UTILI::NG TH E FOLLO l (Al HAS THE PROSABILITY OF OCCUR AENCE OR THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION Or EQUlrYENT I.
j l IVPCRTANT TO SAFE ~Y PPEVIOUSLY EVALU ATED IN THE FS AR BEEN INCREASED 7 l C YES 3 NO STATE B ASIS: M M 1 ha k C hky'f~~ _~J l EW A_ th.1.A.) MG2 C^ _ TE7 ? S~ya) Als t%s-t. a&.L r'
_ 2:13ft.si...Lui-
%.'&}eQm_k Vi~
Osx ' tw[> C/ b.%1 m-L a % TM CLJ.~. w_ w= & A. u A 5, Afr(& b '.
j IB) H AS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCICENT OR MALFt.,NCTION OF A OlFFEREN7 TYPE TH/.N ANY .IV ALUATED PQEVIOUSLY IN THE FyR B EEN CR EATED? CYf $ NO STATE B A SIS: T!~~~ M +>[
,A % & _P_ kWt %> ]K O Y.Qs y --
f N O (C) HAS THE MARGIN OF SAFETY. AS DEFINEDIN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OR IN THE FSAR 3E{N REDUCED)
C YES $ NO STATE BASIS: h k N c-^ W d k i b k w b b d N 2&Lsd,mtAM f
$1.a_4.d t f)L u m . Sa hygLE h.I e & #A,__144 M4 :_14 GAdiel t./ l.M O. d il MLJA_!ugw r [A+ka e U.m G.a e i e4 %1a_ :Wf- /ng.-6
~
_ ,o . 6.Atwtsb sic,4 a % hn. W.k.,phJ_&M Y d. d % C n W &e 3 'WQLy g W,1Em !q % WM w hale,-A cm: .
% bO N6m Mdd <3 $ C I S kb ; ' ,
CCES THE ACTIVITY APPEAR TO- INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION C YES 3 NO O < C YES $ \
Nd .MBE SAFETY SiGNiFiCANTn Y _b ,n a - 5+-f4 A W ~. _ d.,..
BY APPROVED n- a 4
I _
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
) SerVICO' PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO CN ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION NO. G CT- M 83 PAGE 14I i CATEGOttV TYPE: O CN Overai! Z CN Submittal Ot COI- 7 2 b _
Are all measurable nonradiological effects of this activity confined to the on site areas previously d:sturbed during site preparation, plant construction or previous plant operation? T,Yes C No i State basis E m 4 b UM&u$kM
% d e { S Q Ch ?, 9 EQ f% b - (_crt u M & & - ltl9 Q & '_
1 i
is the activity required to achieve compliance with Federal. State or local environmentai regulations? O Yes M No I Applicable Regulations NO TE- 19 e ther aesser s Yes t~e actxty cces not :nvohe an unrev esec environmentalquest on. S gn anc care r~e form. If ccth ansse's are No.
the actvry has the corent.at fcr creat ng anvr'rewesec enwronme"tat cuest on Comc e:e the rema naer of th s evaluat=cn form. ;
EVALUATION (Use additionalsheetsif required) '
l 1.
Is the activity identified in the final environmental statement (FES) C Yes C No Or Supplementary Environmental Documents (See Q-3)?
Ident:fy documents and document sections reviewed
- 2. Determine whether or not the activity involved is an unreviewed environmental question using the fo!!owing guidelines, tif the answer to any of the fo!!owing questions is Yes, then this activity involves an unreviewed environmental question.)
(A) Will this activity result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES? Z Yes : No State basis iB) Will this activity result in a s:gnificant change in the types, or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents, or a significant increase in the authorized power level? - Yes Z No State basis tC) Does tnis activity involve an environmental matter not previously reviewed and evaluated in the FES?
Z Yes - No State basis l
\
\
l l
l Does the act:vity involve an unreviewed environmenta; question? Z Yes Z No By lu ( l.ad4L/ b 6_~' Aporoved d_M'2 b N f b
;A1 i
5UNAT at ;A'E 5 L'.Af.at i
VY _ J ?. 24 4)U
\-
FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Public
') SerVICet PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADD QC INSPECTION REPORT Page of Ecu,cment Numter [ 9iq"U3 ' 7 9 J J' (/ L/ y- A 5 5b c, A TE7) 001/b r/6 - ~
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ecu ement Name 0 & M Manual AM Eqwpment Location CovD1e L. /b s s/ - V &. ,, s- 33g No. ,yg NCR No. N Insrect'on Ts oe N Work to te Performed CC.T-'27.-8[ CWP No. Tf - 2 (o c.2 Other c c T - 2 2 X 2, CALIBR ATED EQUIPMENT C w t> TL '2 6 /
C AllBR ATED l lDENTIFICATION CAllB R ATION l EXPIRATION DATE QC ITEMS l NUMBER I X/nM s v n O'T n i m 3 I t T n g c- I !) ~ 9 3 i M i i l i i !
i 1 i
' i j t i DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION PLACE OF MEASUREMENT i CRITERIA I A/F ' ! ail i QC
% I h/ $ (/%: b [l 3_l 0 l l/
'N i i A N ._ - i l l / 1 N. I ! l /
NJ i 1 / r i 'N A l l ~, .
. /- l j i '---i , I I Verify Proper Material Control For Job. List Apolicable DC Numbers Below:
~9 y ,2 f cs i i i i i i Quality Control Actions Utdized (Check):
[ Stop Work [ NCR [ CAR [ Tagged Comments c. t 7- ~ 2 2 S .3 SW C./ 5/uc% />y o? c cc h 3) tir 7 v/h t (=16C & LL t=1e B Cw"c trAws nf' / c>< sc 3 rs" E Ag W5,
_f), f 1:e i.c o s i n - /?* C-6 3 0F E 7 f C. >2e c s <.- F D 12s wa n.A.
e rpL cd:
J.'t1- G E S G- /s3 C- 12 9 -
C- /cy C- / CL
~
- C,.- J.s ~Y G 1 2. c.,
G. 2L ( l X 'l
(- 3 Li F1GH 6- 4 '? r 11T C _ c "i (L /44 G G4 C/97 ~
C 77 G/4u ,
(- SC (-(t/Q - Au n T C u u~ TT ? 'i / W cT 19 v 3 C /32 b/r0 G l S~ L d i t' l G / C ~) &' ! A ML _
_ (L1lh 6 insoection sT'/ Testis'fCorEcleted Satisf actory.
Mes Z No if NO. explain and reference applicable doeurpetits in comment section. j inspected By '--T '
Date 3 Y7 r wv e m u sm .
Public FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Paga of b
- x SC TVICC/= PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY CF CSLCRAD$
QC CONTINUATION INSPECTION CHECKLIST EQUIPMENT N AME/ NO. C_(_ 7 - 2 4 8 6 L e<+rVD /^> 3*8 -
, /*/o Y5 f if tJT vf)Lj c f~ 0o P3 W c A l W5" _R 9 2 9/ cfricc
/d Y / O O T 3 - 0 (~, /b LA Ch' % / IW }) (PG C7/ t/E ~ (J A>J2-42,t, p 7,
_(n r Y/ u O S?k U b&~ l C S k &2 D l2& YN)& .
%k 2-r-77 6
4f~ cs ew cc.~stn<f r 2 2 Fr 3 o rt n n ex C #A in svr rw T 93 79'3 ~~ Z 9 3 T V Y A w rcr Norrn o~ x ~ _ --r TO L< cx h e L, tr
- T9nc i
CA sl9/8 2 . _
g' c 'u W ? ? '% / y.w CG+crD - C c~r r?+,v c,e Th , e s s. rio s oy 9wh LGo 7 9 3 7e 7 / s JV n a Pc
/3 6
,C A 319 /P y CCT Co M,/92.e~7T 7F 5 I Co ~ML C-T&-7 G4-7 Qu/I 3 / 9,/k ,~7 y
l l
1 Inspected By
/ /*
h L Nu ^'
Date -
sC A M ' Ai 372 22 5295
*}}