ML20150D985

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 9990035/78-02 on 780911-14 & Assoc Notice of Deviation
ML20150D985
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/12/1978
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Sam Graves
BOEING CO.
Shared Package
ML20150D971 List:
References
REF-QA-99900335 NUDOCS 7812110062
Download: ML20150D985 (2)


Text

' '

UNITED STATES

[pA "4e o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ o REGION IV 5

  • $ 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 o
  • AH LINGTON, TEXAS 76011 l

12 OCT 1978

Docket No. 99900335/78-02 Boeing Engineering and Construction A Division of The Boeing Company ATTN
Mr. S. M. Graves, Director Post Office Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124 4 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. R. L. Brown of this office on September 11-14, 1978, of your facility at Seattle, Washington, associated with the manufacture of component supports and restraints and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. P. G. Webster and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA )

Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service'provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibil-

.ity for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others. You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of proce-dures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observa-tions by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA i Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to~ the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been t or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and. (3) the date your ,

corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.  !

I 781211oo(}g

I l

Boeing Engineering l and Construction In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice," '

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with .

enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information-that you believe to be proprietary, it is nec-essary that you make a written application within thirty.(30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which.it is claimed that the.information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in.the application is contained in a separate part.of the document. If we do not hear from you in this regard within the'specified period, the report will be placed in -

the Public Document Room.-

?

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, h NA Uldis Potapovs,. Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

(. .

1. Notice of Deviation
2. Inspection Report No. 99900335/78-02

. %