ML20150D936

Forwards Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Re Rev to Fee Requirements of 10CFR170 & 10CFR171 Re Annual Fees for Power Reactor OLs

ML20150D936
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/27/1988
From:	Mcdonald W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
FRN-53FR24077, RULE-PR-170, RULE-PR-171 NUDOCS 8807140240
Download: ML20150D936 (20)

Text

.. , . , , - _ .

L> i.

. . . . ., a, ., ,

e, -s y

1 i

IMPORTANT NOTICE June 27, 1988 T0: ALL PARTS 30, 40, 50, 61, 70, 71, 72 AND 73 LICENSEES, APPLICANTS AND REACTOR VENDORS

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED REVISIONS T0 10 CFR 170 AND 171 ON LICENSE AND ANNUAL FEES Gentlemen:

On June 27, 1988, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission published in the Federal Register (53 FR 24077) for public comment the enclosed. ~

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. This notice proposes revisions to the-fee requirements of '10 CFR 170 ("Fees for Facilities and Materials Licenses and Other Regulatory Services'...") and 171 ("Annual Fee for ,

Power Reactor Operating Licenses"). These revisions are being made to update the current fees and to implement Section 5601 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation I.ct of 1987 (Public Law 100-203) enacted by the Congress. The fee legislation requires the Comission to collect under 10 CFR 170 and 171, as well as under other provisions of law, not less than 45 percent of its costs for each of fiscal years 1988 and 1989.

Comments should be submitted by July 27, 1988. The NRC staff will hold a public nieeting to discuss the proposed changes and to answer any questions on July 7,1988, at 3:00 p.m. in Room 2F-17 at the NRC's White Flint North Building,11555 Rockville' Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The major changes proposed to Parts 170 and 171 would:

1. P_ art 170: ,

a. Remove the fee ceilings for reactor and major fuel cycle /) g r permits, licenses, amendments and inspections, jV r 'g 3

b. Revise the hourly rate in 10 CFR 170.20 for NRC professional staff time spent providing various regulatory services and provide for an annual adjJstment. ' I

f. c. Charge for all routine and non-routine inspections; the /

current maximum billing frequency is being eliminated. I l* l I

/,,VI ,r g71 170 240 880627 PDC 4

E '

s., ,

is s. ,

I 4

i

d. Remove the application fee for reactor facility license amendments and other approvals, as well as for reactor

~

i related . reports. - J

e. Remove the application fee for standardized design l approvals-and defer payment of costs for standardized reactor design, reviews and certifications until the

, standardized-design is referenced.

2. Part 171:

Revise upward the annual fee ce: ling and change the method of allocating costs so that those licensees requiring the greatest expenditure of NRC resources would

. pay-the most fees.

In. addition to the above, the notice being published solicits your

. 'coments on a ,second l option. Under this option, the Comission at this

time would not adopt any changes to Part 170.or Part 171 other than to

. raise the annual fee so that the amount of fee collected by the ,

" Comission under '10 CFR 171.15, when added to . fees that would be collected under 10 CFR 170 as currently codified, would approximate, but

.not be less than 45' percent of the NRC budget.

All parties desici:1g to. submit written coments for. consideration should

send them~ to the Secretary of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission,

. Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch.

Questions relating to the proposed revisions should be directed to the

-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention:

License Fee Management Branch.-

Sincerely,

~

r OHginal signed bg '

Patricia G. Norry]

i, illiam G. Mcdonald, Director E ,

< Office of Administration and 1- Resources Management

Enclosure:

' Federal Register Notice l.

L .

AR FMC OFFICE: A FMB ARM F son L r/RMS i ggins onald SURNAME:RMDiggs:rj CJ l

L- ~DATE: 6/Ag/88 6 loway 88 GJohp/886/

6/q'1 88 6# /88

f DISTRIBUTION:

W LPDR LFMB Part 170 and 171 Files RMScroggins, ARH/FMC LHiller, ARM /FMC GJohnson, ARM /DAF RFonner, OGC RSmith, 0GC CJHolloway, LFMB RMDiggs, LFMB GJackson, LFMB DWeiss, LFMB LShea, LFMB ARM /DAF R/F LFMB R/F (2)

PNorry, ARM /DAF TRothschild, OGC 6:{RegIhles.:u;;,

DW/RMD/ Pro Rev 10 CFR

- ~ . . . - . - . ...

h h ??

, , revice the houely eate foe NRC professional time spent pmviding various regulatory services and provide for an armuel adjustment: {3) revise upward the ceiling on annual fees assessed pursuant to 10 CFR Part 171:

(4) include, when appropriate, o j reimbursements from the Department of f--

1 Energy Nuclear Weste Ptmd. (5) charge 6

' for each routine and nontoutim }--

inspection conducted by the NR81. (6) remove the applicatkm fee and defer payment of costs for standardized reactor design reviews and certifications until a standardited design is referenced, and (7) remove mnendment

. application Kling fees for power reactors and reactor retened (topicel) reports. The proposed chenges Meted above will result in those oppucents and licensees

((

requiring the greetest expenditure of -

NRC resources paying the greatest fees.

, All applicants and heensees curre :tly "

' subject to fee collections would be -

affected by the proposed rule in 10 Q1t y Parts 170 and 171. p_

DA115:The comment perod expires July L 27,1988. Comments received after this 7--

de'e wtD be conaldered II u is practical _

to do so but the Commission la able W j assure consideration only for comments i received on or before this date. Bacasse of the need to implement the legislation proruptly. requests for extension of tisse .

will n61 be granted.

ADORF BSES: Submit writkm cottunesta to Secretary. U.S. Nuclear Regulateey {

Commission, Weshioston, DC 206M. 1 A'ITN: Docketing and Service Branch. i E

lland deliver mr-n'a to: 11555 -

Rockville Pike. Rockville Msryland _

20&&2 between 7.30 sJn. and 4:15 p.m. _

(Talephone (301) 483-1906) L Copies of comments received may be [=

examined at the NRC Public Document g NUCLEAR REGULATORY Room.171711 Street. NW Washington, rc COMMISSION DC. p 10 CfTt Parts 170 and 171 ron pusmesa seerosesATion cowt Act: ,L Lee Hiller Aesistant Controller. U.S. 2 Revision of Fee Schedules Nuclear Regulatory Commission. F-Washington. DC 20555. telephone (301) =

AGENcv: Nuc} ear Regulatory goggj,,jgy, 492-7351. ,

Acil0N: Proposed rule. surPLranENTARY lesFo#ssAT10N:

I. Du hground _

11. Anstysie ofInielation -

suesanAny:The Nuclear Regulatory

' Commission is proposing to arnend its IH.Propoeed Action y regulat!ons by reviaing its fee schedoles IVEnvironental

5. SCCi' "DS*'i'0" F

Impact: A^*l Categ*i' scal M; in 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171. This revision is necessary both to update the VI Pap ork Reduction Act Statement I current fees and to implement the most VII. Regulatory Anolysis t-recent fee legislation enacted by the Vit!. Rerwtatory tiexibthey Certincation h Congress. The proposed atnendments tx. Badfit Analysis -

would:(li Remove the 10 CFR Part 170 fee ceiltngs for application reviews and I.Bd W inspections for power reactors; fuel Section 5801 of the Omnibus Budget cycle facilities, transportaton cask Reconcliiation Act of 1987, signed into h

packages and shipping containers:(2) law on December 22,1987 (Pub.1.100-b

.f h

. .. 24078 Feder ! Regist:r [ Vcl. 53, No.123 / Mondayi juna 27, 1988 / Proposed Rules 203), amended section 7601 of the 1 no previous limitation under '

Consolidated Omnibus Budget to include those collections, expressly COBRA of 33 percent on collections by referenced as excludable in II.J.

Reconciliation Act of1985(COBRA) the NRC for regulatory services is raised Resolution 395, in the calculation of (Pub. L 99-272). which requires the to at least 39 percent (33% + 0T). moneys to be collected pursuant to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 2. Added to the 39 percent are all to collect annual charges from its section 5601 for the purpose of offsetting other assessments made by the NRC one. half ofits fiscal appropriaticn.

licensees. The amendment, in pertinent pittsuant to House Joint Resolution 395, part, requires the Commission to collect Accordingly, these moneys, ..

as enacted (Pub. L 100-202. Dec. 22, approximately $7 mill'on total will not under 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171, as well 1987).

as under other provisions of law, not be included within the 45 percent target

3. liowever,in any event the NRC on NRC collections.

less than 45 percent ofits costs for each must collect no less than 45 percent of with re8ard to the phrase "in no event of Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989. Its costs in each of fiscal years 1988 and Part 170 implements Tite V nf the 1989.

shall such percentage (total charges Independent Offices Appropriation Act %e first point is clear and builds on colketed) be less than a total of 45 percent of such costs in each such fiscal r of 1952 (31 U.S.C. 9701). The fees Parts 170 and 171, as currently applied

(,harged under Part 170 recover the costs . by the NRC to its applicants and year." Read alone, this phrase could be to the NRC of providing individually licensee.. However, the second point is read to mean that the NRC must collect identifiable services to applicants for ambiguous because of its reference to at least 45 percent of its budget and may collect significantly more than that and holders of NRC licenses and . other assessments. Two categcries of. amount liowever, when read in the approvals.ne fee schedules under Part moneys received by the NRC are context of all of section 7001, the 170 were last revised on hiay 21,1984 addressed in Res ition 395. Tha first (49 FR 21293), based on cost and categoryincludes moneys recalved by Commission believes that the intent of rnanpower data from FY 81, Congress was to raise the overall the Commission for the cooperative "Part 171 implements CODRA by nuclear safety research prograrc* percentage of fees collected a minimum charging an annual fee to NRC power services rendered to foreign of 6 percent but,if other collectione (Part reactor licensees ($1 FR 33224: governments and international 170. etc.) did not result in collecting 45 -

September 18,1986). NRC's Part 171 fee snizations, and the mavrial and percent of the NRC budget. then the .

adiedule was recently upheld by the o]ormation i access authort.ationannual total of charge should be raised so that a no less than 45 percent of NRC courts. Florida Power and Light vs. programs including criminal history United States No. 86-1512 (D.C. Ctr. hiay checks under section 149 costs is recovered. Although the 33 .

13,1986). %e annual fee recovers NRC Energy Act, as amended.,0f De secondthe Atomic percent level was a ceiling under section category includes revenues from 7001 prior to amendment of the section, costs Incurred in prodding generic the Commission notes that the statute, regulatory services to these licensees. licensing fees,las tien services, and I Section foot, prior to its amendment. other services an collections as indicated above, requires collection limited NRC recovery of its costs under. estimated at one-half tha NRC's FY 1988 of no less than 45 percent for fiscal ap riation of $392.800,000. years 1988 and 1989. The 45 percent Parts 170 and 171, and other provisions

- sually, the term ' assessment,, refers does not regsresent a ceiling. ne bes't oflaw to 33 percent ofits budget As-amended, section 7801 of COURA. in - to a tax, fee or other charge on reading of the statute is that Congress pertinent part, now provides that: something or for some service. The latended collections to be not less than Commission believes that the mone,ys 45 P'reent of the NRC budget.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall Accordingly, actual collections will assess and collect annual charges from its collected as a result of contractual arrangements entered pursuant to the approximate but be at least 45 percent licensees on a fiscal year basis except that--

(Al the maximum amount of the aggregate cooperative nuclear safety research of the Commissiods budget. Consistent charges assessed pursuant to tNs paragraph program should not be construed as wi.th the view that collections taa)

In any hscalyear may not exceed an amount "assessments", as that term is normally exceed 45 percent, the current i 171.2 .

that. when added to other amounts collected used. Similar3 y, payment for services which r>rovides foi efunde if the by the Commission for such fiscal year under rendered to foreign govertiments and statutory cening is exceeded,is no other provisions ollaw,is estimated to be longer necessary. Therefore, we propose international organizations should not equal to ,,3 percent of the costs incurred by to delete this section.

the Comminion with respect to such fiscat be considered "assessments" due to the cooperative nature of these endeavors. The issue remains as to whether the 9 suc p toen ge a all e in r se an Thus, of the llen's included in the first requireinent to increase charges so as to additional e percent of such costs plus all cat? gory, only moneys collected under collect 45 percent of the NRC budget other assessme-ts made by NRC pursuant to the material and information access should be applied to all of FY 1988. The Ifouse loint Realution 395. Ioath Congress. authorization programs coulo possibly enncted legislation addresses recovery 1st Senion, as enacted. but in no es ent shall of NRC costs for both fiscal years 1988 be considered assessments.T hose such perrentage be less than a total of 45 amounts are estimated to be 53 million and 1989. The Commission concludes pcrt ent of such costs in each such hscal year. for FY 1961 with no significant increase that it is the intent of Congress that the The requirement onder section 7001 tant expected in FY 1989. liowever. it is Commission recover 45 percent of its such chcrges be reasonably related to apparent that under the terms of H.J. cors for both years, which leads to the the regulatory service provided by the Resolution 395, neither thne collections result that the revised annual charge Commission and fdly reflect the cost to nor collections for cooperative research (part 171) will be applicable to all of FY the Commission of providing this service program and services to foreign 1988. Consistent with past practices. the is unaffected by the recent amendments. governments were to be considered fees. changes to Part 170 (increased fees) will II. Analysis of Inislation These moneys are expressly excluded apply from the effective date of the final from the user fee collections that are to rule.

Section 5001 of the Omnibus Budget t>e applied under 11 J. Resolution 395 as 111. Proposed Action Reconcdiation Act of 19fi7 (Pub. L 100- an offset to the full appropriation for the 2tu. Dec. 22.198'). read literally, makes NRC. Thus, the Commissian believes 1he Commission proposes to amend the following points: that it was not the intent of theCongrens 10 CI'R parts 170 and 1711n a way that

. J b-

- * .' . Federal Register / Vol. 53. No.123 f Monday. June 27, 1968 / Proposed Rules 24079 7 4 1

, will eccomplish recovery of . The Commisaion also seeks comment Section 170.20 . A vemge cost per g

! cpproximately, but not Icss than 45 on a second option. Under this option, professiono/ staff.liour.

• percent of its costs for fiscal years 1988 the Commission at this time would not end 1980 recpectively. This objective adopt changes to Parts 170 or Part 171 This section is modified to reflect an I

, . wide professional staff-hour rate will be met by dY other than to raise the annual fee so that "

1. Changing the hourly rate under Patt bad on cum Dsca1 cosh W the 170 to reflect current fiscal emts and '

the amount of fees couetted by the Agenm sec a so mom to 7 Commission under 10 CFR 171.1! when providing for an annual adWments: added to fees that would be collected reflect that the hourly rate w,ll i be ;y

2. Removing the ceilings on certain " " d C"" " ' '

under Part 170 as currently codified.

collections made pursaant to Part 170; would approtmate, but not be less than

"**'"

• I '*' ]%

3. Charging for each routine and 45 percent of the NRC budget ~

^^" 8' E# E '

nonroutine inspection conducted; professional staff rate for the NRC for The agency work papers which FY 1988 is 500 per hour, or $138.8 } ,:

4. Raising. when necessary. the annual fee assessed pursuant to Part 171. 8Upport the proposed changes to 10 CFR thousand per ITE (professional staff  ;

P rts 170 and 171 are available in the Additionally the Part 171 fees to licensees will be based upon the Public Document Roorn.1717 H Street year). In each subsequent year, the hourly rate will be adjusted to reflect

'j principal that licensees which require NW. Washington DC 20555. current cost per direct stafT lTE. An the greatest expenditure of NRC The NRC will hold a public meeting D

analysis of the costs which generateA N resources, sball pay the greatest fee. on July 7 at 3.o i pm in Rocm 2F17 White this rate Is provided in the Part 171 h

5. Including moneys recovered from Flint North.11555 Rockville Ptke. Section by-Section analysis. The the Nuclear Waste Fad. as managed by Rockville, Maryland to discuss the resultant hourly rate will be published in the Departrnent of Energy pursuant to proposed changes and answer any the Federal Register prior to the next 7 the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. as questions. fiscal year as a final rule. - '

ampndedifor costs ;ncdtred by the NRC .

b.

associated with licensing a high.lesel IV. Section.t,y.Section Analysis ly#{fu hndut/ t o fcc /[.

6Ie o e hpplicatioIn fee and To ccomplish these ob[ectives, under retiew ofstandardtr/erence de4 gn / ;  ;

deferring payment of costs for Option 1, the Commission is. proposing cpprovols, specto/ projects. and . >

standardized reactor desiga resiew a'nd to redse catab secons of 10 CFR . inspections.

certification for up to 10 years. Parts 170 and 171. He following section-Within the schedule of fees, all ,j

' 7. Removing amendment application by.section analysts of those sechons '

services (other than most application- 'I fees for power reactors arid reac' tor . affected provides. additional related (topical) repo*ts. explanatory information. All rderences Iling fees) will be changed from the ~ ' d current specified co.t to "Full cost." ne R The Commission is proposing to are to Title 10. Chapter 1. Code of i remo,e many of the current ceilings on Federal Regulations.

schedule for Standard Reference Design h Review is modified to reflect the ["

the collection of fees. It should be noted amendment of i 170.12 addressed that the ceilings under the current ruS Part 170 abose.

were sstablished by the Commission at Section 170.12 Payment offees. With the removal of ceilings for the requent of the regulated industry as a means of assigning predictability as to Paragraphs (c),(dl. (el. and (f) are ie the for h ,

what the final costs of a regulatory. chanpd to remove the $150 application {er{an service would be. S,nce the effectwe fee for mactor license amendrnents and established has been reached wiU not be billed if prior to the effective da'te of this

[P ei date of the rule in 19&1 and as a direct other approvals. p{

result of these cefhngs we estimate that gg .gg g l.

Withm paregraph (e). Approval fees, over the years the NRC has not completed. For adininistrative reasons.

the current reference to facility standard "h Ib

• ' I collected $23 million in fees for referenta design approvals is changed to h '- b " '^ "

regulatory nervices presided to some o e R G e to re over app icants/ licensees. remove the application fee and to permit those cost [which it incurred after . 1

, ,. deferral of review and certification fees current ceiling was reached and before a .  !

Addido lly, he Commission strongly until the design is referenced, payable revised rule is enacted and becomes ,

"M nt n "3 88 equ [g the r est e ; n ture of rfrectis e as a result of this rulcmakh 4 1 i the deMgri is mferenced. l{om"- Costs incurred after the effective date of NRC ri sources should pay the greatest  :

regardkss of whethn tbs dmign is a final rule resulting from this fees. This is the rationale for the refmnced, the full mis w,01 he _,

Commf aian's proposal to remove some rulemaking will be billed. The ,g'I fee ceilines. The hfting of ceilings will recosered by the NRC from the boldar of professional staff-hours expended up to A) not re ult m unnecessary NRC resources the design approval within 5 3 cars fiom the effective date of this rule will be at yfy being dm oted to a given task.The NRC the date of a pre:imina y design the professional rates established for the ;b' has an increasingly limited budget and approval WWnal thgn approv,il Juno 20.1984 rule. Any professional *I therefore cannot afford to use its hmited (FDA). Upon request, the five-3 ear hours expenJed after the effechve date ,l '

r7souices unwisely if it is to successfully period may be extended to 10 years perfonn its mission. In order to provide from the date of the desgn certification.

of this ruN will be assessed at the FY 1983 rates reflected in this proposed

{IN 6

,hl our arplicants and licensees an estimate in the event the standacdaed des;gn rule. (1be same applies to the removal of approval application is der. icd.

of what NRC fees for performing ceilinu ender the proposed revisions of .!

scrsices might be, we are providmg in Appendices A and il a non.bindmg withdraw n, suspended. or action on the application is postponed. fees w ill be i 170.31 and 17032 below.) 1 he footnotes to this schedok also are (i) M

• schedu!c of estimated fees wFkh may ce!!ected when the review. to that print, raadified to brin 2 them into conformity be used for planning purposes in the is compteted and the fis c (5)installmem with tha propo sed amendments to this absence of ceilings. pa3 ment proced :re ni" not apply. << bed A jy

• 4 o

r R

1 24000 Federal Regist;r / Vol. 53. No.123 / Monday. Jurie 27, 1988 / Proposed Rules Sectwn 170.31 Schedule offeesfor budgeted obligations because the NRC's materials licenses and other regulatory estimates that it will collect $36.5 million annual budget is prepared on an pursuant to Part 170 this fiscal year, but semces. obligation basis. no money from the Nuclear Waste Fund 1 Llk e i 170.21. this section is modified The term "Overhead costs" is defined in FY 1988. In accordance with the

/

to rbflect the removal of ceilings on to include three components:(1) . formula provided in i 171.15. for FY certain calogories of fees and to charge Government benefits for each employee 1938: 3177 million minus approximately full costs for those services. Fees for sut.h as leave and holidays. retirement '536.5 million for part 170 + So million for (ach ensuing year will be published in and disability costs. health and life Nuclear Waste Fund) equals the Fedoral Register, as in the case of insurance _ costs. and social security c sts;(2) travel costs:(3) direct epproximately $140.5 million to be i 170.20. Footnotes to the chedule that recovered through annual fees. Since at are s ffected by this 'a'ction are revised to verhead, e g , supervision. program least 45 percent is to be collected. the be consis'v.. wtth this resision. supp,o f;e'bfgd (4 nd en

, nd bs amount charged under Part 171 will also Jection 170.32 Schedu/e offees for support act;vities. Factors have been be dependent on the number of health, safety, and safeguards developed for these overhead costs exemptions granted pursuant to i 171.11 inspections for tnoterals licenses. which are applied to hourly rates and the number of new power reactor l

Fee ceilings for selected services are developed for employees providing the licenses issued during the fiscal year.  :

removed and the remaining fixed fees regulatory services within the categcries he following areas are those NRC

[

P are retained since the ratio of NRC costs and act;vities applicable to specified programs which comprise the annual F types r classes of reactors. The j in fees collected is anoroximately fee. They have been expressed in terms  ;

equisalent to the percs..tage of the Commission views these costs as being of the NRC's budget program elements budget to be collected into the Gcneral reasonably related to the regulatory and associated activities.

Treasury.The schedule of fees for each services provided to the licensees and. <

ensuing year will be published as a final therefore within the meaning of section ,_

rule in the Federal Register for this 7001, COURA.

schedule.

• Section 171.13 Notice. Reacto' per4ormance c 5nene Footnote 3 is cesised. Currently if the Evalueon Conmncatons frequency of inspection, for example, for Under'the current rule one fee is Engoeenng/ safety a category is 2 years and an Insnection applicable to alllicensed reactors.

is next conducted 1 year and 11 months linder the proposed revalon each Reactor Maintenance ano u m M a seeiaa,ce b

' after the previous inspection, no fee is reactor will be billed individually, based ucense Peormance Quaiety Assurance assessed. Often times inspections of on those NRC activities from which it . EvaLate  ;

different licensees are scheduled beaefits as a type or within a class of Ocense and Exarrwne Program Deve4opment s because of their close proximity. Such "'*C* 0P***

scheduling represents a more efficient reactors. AccordinQ. annual fees are expected to be different for each of the f 'J

genere wt h' use of resources. Acx:ordingly, i 170.32 various types or classes of reactor nogen eased ta and Tectncae and footnote 3 are being revised to operating licenses. Each bill will reflect insocc mr# support indicate that the fee will be essessed for those specific activities applicable to Regonal Assessment j

each inspection conducted by the NRC.

Otl.er foott.otes are revised as well to each opeeating license as required by the revised i 171.15 discussed below.

p Q ';; h",'*

gon,y p.n.y mr i

make them consistent with the revised Prior to issuance of the bill. the annual s w oy Teenn.cs spec

• mons schedule. fee forpach applicable licensee will be improvements L

Part I?! published in the Federal Register. S*' GO*'

5mP in light of the above, the Commission 'C'/"" 17115. Annual FeeMonw y,g'em*'taton,7 is proposing to revise certain sections of reactor operating hcenses. nese.,en .no 10 CFR part 171. De following section- ~

by section analysis of those sections affected provides additional '

Paragraph (c)!s modified to reflect a target percentage of 45 percent rather ocens,e neactor concept os operatens than a maximum percentage of 33 Acet vana9ement and impien atng explanatory information. All references percent. The formula used to calculate Evatation TecM cal proceoses are to Title 10. Chapter 1. Code of **9**

the annual fee is modified to reflect the Federal Regulations.

inclus;cn of moneys expected to be come,.ce ^ [' #*

saiegsos beens,'g Reguwory Et*cNe ess Section 171.5 Definitons. collected from the Nuclear thgh Level ano aspecte Ae w the following definitions are being Waste (ilLWj Fund administered by the Re*eto vesser ano pressure vesw sa'e:r r added Department of Energy and the estimated 8 N The term "Budgeted oblNations"is collections under Part 170 for each fiscal i"**

year. Funds will be collected ftom the  ! n.,m' CThe,

.,o tenncas dehned to be the projected obligations Nuclear liLW Fund beginning in FY Ag ns cd Rea:w A;rns Aescrch of the NRC that likely will result in co-mewats 1989. The sum of these funds uill be payreents by the NRC during the same er a future fiscal year to proside subtracted from the amount reflecting 45 percent of the NRC budet prior to g,, g g u.,,,

fj[$'w regulatory services to licensees. - determining the annual fee for each y ,tnoos Dadgeted obligations include, but are sesw au 9e Ea tn smes licensed power reactor. Pro'ec+on Resea'c+i co-conent nespo%. to not limited to amounts of orders to be In FY 1988, the Comrmssion murt E es placed contracts to be awarded, and recover 45 percent of its appraed y, ,,

tersires to be prm uled to lu.ensees. budget of $392AXWo0. Appl >ing the fee Sc Fees billed to hcensees are 1,ased on { se.sm,..,u.c cey va.g rates proposed herein. the NRC '

Mevs

w. wuww-w-wwwww ee--, A

Y *., . i.editrl Huguter / Vol. 5J, No.123 / Mtniday june 27,1Wo / Proposed Hules 24001 3 a

. t -

g Proy a n e;emont Acfaity Program element Actrv4y inspection at the time the annual fee is' f f published. Fach activity applicable to a l P

' Mant Pe*1ormance ...._ ..q MIST. -Pedormance tr@ cates._. Maeage Pwfor nacce lice!. Sed power reactor Will be indicated L-7000 . 'ndicetor P ogram. on the bill iss'ued to the licensed reactor t ROSA IV and Otr.or Oeyv>she Eveiveons .. Conduct Diagnostic

-for the next fiscal year's annual fee.

Foreign Esperiments conertu.nq Esp.nwntM Evaluations of Prict to the issuance of the bill, the f3 =

Ucensee Pedormance.

capaw, incident invest 9ation . Management incraent annual fee for each applicable licensee I  !

Once.Three steam ir**st9amn Program. will be published in the Federal 5 i Generator 184w) NRc irodent Response . Ernergency Response Bas.c stu+et oats sprem. Register' - r-ovvesognent and Assessment ct Codes oe co and Ma.nrain Response Center Paragraphs (d) and (e) of the current rule are being deleted ad superfluous 10

( -

code Unr.ec.enty Ewapnwnt, To@rncal Supppt 4 the proposed approach to annual fees.

Proceaun es and L  ;

Cen**r - Anah*ca' Too's-Humanoerformance ^

Supplemental Analysis on AnnualFee '

s uman ra: tors Program Cocncaton nesnarcet Human Error Da*a and oe e Opwates O'f cers.

Detennination Underf,172.15 h=

k Copect on and Te@nscd Training PWR/0WH Te@rvjovy . Under current ITslation the NRC is  :

i w,y,s Center. Tan'ng . , ' to collect, and deposit to the General 4 Rekatshty of Peactor Perforrnance indica'ars Operational Data Anahs.s of Operasorm . Fund of the Treasury, an amount to ;1_'

Splems Plant and Setems Risk Anahses. Esp 4nnco 'approAlmate but not b8 less than 45 =

ard Rehatwy. Anav>$ of Owabor.al DependentFa%re Trends and Pa'1 ems.

perc'ent.ofits budget in fiscal year 1988 t' t

wrys,s_ Operatonat osta corw.t. Sveen and the Pres.i dent's budget foe the NRCis t Erterral Event Safety Collecton and feed 8vsi Operaionei $392.8 million. "lhus, in 171988 the NRC -

Maons oissermnate Deta. should collect at least $177 million. In Radionuclide Source Assaon Pro &c18ehaeor Operational and 171988,it is estimated thet g

PNafC a tne te approximately $36.5 million will be )

Reactor (oount solem

- collected from specific licensees under Part 170, but no mobey collected ' rom L

Reactor contament-. . StructuraJ Tests. f Each nf these activities is related to tha Department of Energy ifigh-Leve i ,

cae Men Pmgresson t

providing services to operating nuclear Waste Fund. Thus, the remaining funds, 7

$1,,"" '

power plants. NRC's efforts in each of approximately $140.5 million ($177  ;

core /concwee these arcas contribute to the licensees' million ! css $36.5 million), will have to p saieractes. continued safe operation of their D'ect conta,n'"*"I be collected undar Part 171. A eiultiplier i facilities and therefore a e of benefit to will be used such that the amount to be 4 SMy,on, them. A broader description of these collected will be equal to Part 170 i case Modeis vaadanon programs is contained in the NRC's cullections, plus liigh. Level Weste Fund

, and Answes. annual buc'act submission to Congress. collections, plus Part 171 potedtial l "Yd' *" *"'**1 *"d See NUREG-1100. Volume 4. "Dudget co collections multiplied by a factor "M." -

, Hanctor Acodent Risk Severe Accadent Estimates Fiscal Year 1909"(February which in future years, will probab}y be ,

Anvys,s Management 1988). While there activities a!so less than one. i Rak Model provide benefits to the public, ber.ause D*' ***l . I they benefit our licensees, these are not sE -

"independent public benefits" as that I

"$D"'[d*^

no ' term is used in user fee case law, Total amount to be co!!ected = Part 170 R,sk neoasee.no collections + liigh.Lesel Waste i und i Anatysos? Accordingly,it is legally permissible to Collections + (Ni r. Part 171 potential R'5" * **d "e*?""e"' charge :icensees for these services. colic < tional Metnodoncgy '

Severa Accident Paragraph (c)is being revised I $177 mdlion = SMS milhon + So Severe Acodent Pol <y ' 4 P ogram impementatio,t reflect that the basis for each annual fee mahon + (si s st40.5 mdhon!

Imp &ementaton y , to _.  !

Regulatory Appe.ca*cn of will be the budgeted obligations for o  :

Ruadon Protecton and RNe uncertaIty activities (regulatory senices) The following analysis supports a

{g_

twn tr'ects searth R,sk Estimates pphcable 'o each nuclear power potential Part 171 fee schedule which neun ry,s.cs reactor as one of a type or class of. could total about $140.5 milhon. In :1 Tecnnoioav

'mp'3* *ats reactors, e s.. boil:ng wWr reactors or pressuri7ed water reas tors. lising this identifying the universe of plants / p liceesees for each program the following G.mc a*s uneu i f sa'et,isss s L 4proach, the Commission aill rai h year, establish the budgeted obligations categories of program beneficiaries were identified:

e{s .

!' Hu Reacsa spiem es.xs (including as erhead costsJ for each r

ean Faciaosus 1. All commercial nuclear pcwer eg;!

M

! *S*8" Am*ct 'Ss*s activity on a per reactor unit basis, and

Q*QS[* establish the total costs for those reactors (with Ol/s)--110 plants. 9i

. All c nnmercial nuclear power tuv +p.y ni regu.aiory services provided to each reac tors East of the Rockies-98 plants.

l me.n9 nowate l mev;o or wr, .t ?

P . paws reactor licensed to operate. NRC labor

ia*p"ret Hwa aM 3. All Generril Electric (gel nuclear #E costs attributable to these activities will :y-i ' W **'*^) j t>e determined using the hourly rates per madors .R.s N Nants. g S , establahed on the basis o(an anal3sis L AU UNO" D**N N 'h l "M=@enw"on '

i ep I of direct and indirect (oserhead as nucle r p wer reactors-14 plants.

l l M S * **Daco*mse9

! defined h(rein) staffing costs -

I attributable to the regulatory senit es

5. All Westinghous nuclear power.

reartors-49 pbnts.

p'q (

1s  ! prosided. Exh resis'on of these hourly I rates w di be asailable for pubk

6. All Dabcod A %ikos (DAW) tw lear power rectors-10 plants.

j tt-rl i

e l -

1

1 24082 Federal Reglster / Vol. 53, No.123 / Monday, Jun] 27, 1988 / Proposed Rules in these instances the costs to NRC a: Salaries and Benefits for these programs shou!d be paid for on TAsta ll-FY 1988 BUDGET BY MAJOR

b. Administrativq Support a prorata besis, by all plants included la CATEGORY-Continued

c. Travel the above specified categories. By d. Program Scpport y,,, ,,g adding the progru support costs to the

3. Program Support, the use of NRC staff cost for each category of l effort and prorating these costs over the contract or other services for which the NRC pays for support from outside the Tisvet to 45 .

population fee (plants)of is established which requires that categoh*, ose a

Commission,is charged to various categories as used.

, licensees who require the greatest nonf 255 37

4. All other costs (i.e., Salaries and Prograrn Support j 13743 expenditure of NRC resources to pay the Denefits. Travel, and Administrative lariaest annual fee. The following Tow evoget~ 392 so 6 Support) represent "in house" costs and documentation identifies how the NRC i determmed the cost of a direct staff Full- are to be collected by allocating them The Drect FTE Produche Hourty Rm (sBo/ hour)

Time Equivalent employee (PTE) and uniformly over the total number of direct es cawated ty drena the annual non seogram how it allocated, based upon the fiscal FEs '#D * f5#55 * "# d "8 " 'b' ** ""' ** '

year 1988 budget, staff and program Alihough this method differs frqm N 7 7apo YcFTE ( 64 E a support costs to each category of plant / previous methods for recovery of costs' nuner at saman.e nours e one par a744

'I"" S**- it is equally accurate because it '

anc"e'or' O $ [rI. 7

• allocates all "in-house" resource obl a by di p gra [ 1)

Salaries and Benefits, $182.9 million: (2) nWnments our de unMne o%ct Snce pad m is &s%nd to whct Administrative Support, $62.02 mJlion: e nsees based upon work multi. license noture concernmg (3) Travel, $10.45 milliom and (4) performed either directly for a specific licensees With power reactor operating Frogram Support, $137,43 million. hi licensee or a specibe group of hcensees). hcenses, the most feasible method to Using this approach, and excluding accomplish this is to develop fees based si r di ein ec p t of budgeted Program Support obligations, the remaining $232.4 million allocated on NRC budgeted obligations for each i

i NRC programs applicable to fees (See NRC generic or multl. licensee program Table I about 300.6 pes are utuized in un rmh 6e D, wnceW Nan 4 W opeaMg

' efforts associated with Part 171, with the usults in a calculation of $138.8 ficenses. Additionally, since many of the t

remainder be.ag utilized in efforts thousand per FTE for FY 1088. research programs expend e iort for r co ered f t DOEl u e Waste E N Fund or other efforts). Of the total 3,250 sy Orrics e ng s, a W or i

plants in a specific geographic ! ; ation FEs: 1,575A PTEa (3250-1674.2) wiu be (eg. nacton east M Ge M4 Gese considered administrativ3, overhead (supervisory and support) or exempted omee "Y.7 FTE's

• parameters e also used in refining NRC cost by reactor /cperating license.

(due to their program function). Of the i Table 111 presents a summary of Part 171 15754 FEs, a total of 292 FEs and the NRA. ) 1o45 o fees, by reactor category, using the resulting $22.98 million in support are Amarch

" 1617 current fiscal year 1988 budget for exempted from the fee base i ue to the IE00 Wo Program Suppo-t costs and FTE's.

nature ci their functions (i.e ASMP- 52 As can be seen from Table Ill, a Enforcement activities and othes NRC AstaP- 174 reactor which is a B&W reactor, east of

} functions currently exempted by Aca 25 o O',s . the Rockies, would have a fee imposed Commission policy). 83 In determining the cost for each direct which is higher than the' fee imposed on 16'4

• a Westinghousa reactor west.of the labor FTE (an Fm whose position / ,g Rockies (i.e., $1,154 thousand + $342 functi n is such that it can be identified

,,, gngg ine prograra e.cn s, ports thousand + $38 thousand = $1.534 to a specific licensee or class of licensees) whose function, in d r NRC's thousand versus $1,154 'housand + $42 TABLE Il-FY 1988 BUDGET BY MAJOA thousand = $1.190 thousand). This judgment,is necessary to 0 ocJatory CATEcony process, the following rationa's <s used: example also represents the normal

1. All such direct pes are identified

' '" "'I range of fee to be charged under Part 171 by office. of $1.196 thousand to 31.534 thousand.

- The attachment following this a,alysis

2. NRC plans, budgets, and controls -

L on the following four major categories provides a detailed presentation el the san,, e se _ l' te m budgeted ebligations by budget program (see Table !!): Amst awe support: - . _ et ci element and activity.

TABLE lll.-PART 171 FEES eY REAcToa CATEGOAY-SUWARY LO#a's e t%ousa'os!

Reactor catepy

, ,3, 12ES c FTE Total oows j '[

As Acactors . . _ . . . . . _ _ _ .

' At54a'ch . ,_ _ . . . ,.

_.j 110 j 577.11s l 359 2 ' s??c 975 ' s1.154 E.6 811 -

Nf,A . _ . . . . . , ...

its0 81189 AEOO ' 2 928 l 153 7 l 24 262 ... _

. . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i 7.379 e 87 s ; t9.524 !

\. f

, .- .~ , . .. . , -

. , . . . - ,n, TABLE lil.-Pca? 171 FEES ev REACTOR COVEGORY-SwuAnY-Continued 5 4

(Ceaars in thousands)

,d Reactor category , , sM.

toonars)

FTE Total doners Per eactor l

• l Adeonal Charges By Type: t ; I Reactors (East of the Rockwn)' - . 98 3290 3.0 ' 3.706 38 f J l BaW. ._ - .

.10 2.889 38 3.416 342 CE s  ;

14 1 855 -14 2,049 146

• We6tnghouso 49 1,855 I 1.4 2.049 42 GE 2 2.150 .8 2.261 63 i l T(lat . _ . . . .

89.137 i 369 6 140A54 I Table tv pr vvees ertaded analysis of the compos, ton of Tatne m. -

8 Specsai scornac stuGet that benet4 eastern reactors.

Eastern seismisty studas are per$ormed to determee that reactor construccon meets sersmic cetena These are performed only on reeMors east of the Rociues.

(

t Reactors west of the RocAes a ready have se=Smsc critena tricluded in thee "as <radt des *gn" h j A 1 TASLE IV.-PAaT 171 FEES BY CATEGORY-D Tall [.

. r-(Donars in trousands) [  ;

k FY 1988 e.

\

3 l e

Program W

. donars FTE (2- _

4

l. Pert III nOrs for M Reactors pi G A. Forf fil Wors by Researcti(ProgramiAct'v'ty) p --- 1

1. Reactor Vessol and Picag integnty -

$ $0.050 5.0 **

2. Agns of Reactor Components. 7.280 12 0 3 Reactor Equement OuaucaSons .. _

1.100 1S 4 Sersmic and Fre Protecton Research (less Earth Swus $3.990/3 0 FTE 4.000 45 I, 5 Plant Periormance

a. Basic Stuees . )

. . . . . . . . . ~ . -

1291 18

b. CW+ 4 and Assessment of Codes (less GE plants ordy ($7501) 2.740 36 4 y

6 Human Periormance. 2.630 36 i

7. Rehabepy of Reactor Systems 3.020 4.9

4. Ra.$onucfide Source Terms - ..

l.3od 20

9. Reactor Containment Sa'efy (less GE ony-($1.150/ 8 FTE)). .15.523 97

10. Reactor Accsden. Assk Analysis (hess Revens of PRA's $ t.100/3 0 FTE's).. .... 7.118 10 ') i

11. Severe Accdent Program implementauon . ... 950 72

12. Radahon Protection and Health Effects. _. 1.655 l 65

13. Gemenc and Unresolved Safety issues pess Reactor Systems issues-GE or*y -5250) 5.215' , 33.7 ,

14. Developeg and 6mprovmg Regue ntons 2.875 12 0 -

Total Part 171 Work by Research. -... $66.811 118 0 0 Vart 17I Wars tj hRR (1%9rsmMcwty)- l 1 Reactor Performance Evaluabon- .

a Gene << Communicatons .. _. . f.-

5300 78 o b Ervnoereg/ Safety Assessments 414 67

c. Reactor Mac'enance and Surve<ance.-

2. Lacor see Performance Evaluaton Quakty Assurance Prugram...

.. . 100 30 {.

. . . - . . . . . . . ~ 50 81 h 3 Lecense and Enarvne Reacter Operaaons- .

J~

a Proaram Deveupment and AssessmenttRogonai Ovewg' . .. .._ _. . . . . 180 10 9 1 a AwBased inspectons. i a Lab and Techracal Support. s . . . . 184 to 6 *

b. Regonal Assetsment...

5. Spocrasted inspectvy.s ve@r msoeetoes

. . . . . . . . , . . . 0 17 h-

. . . . . . . ._ _ ... 1.160 19 9

6. P ovect Management '

(Progect E ngsneers). . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . _ . . .

(tscenssng AWsta"Ibl . .. _ . .._ .. ._.. . -

0 0

20 2 16.1 7 Regtsslory Ireprovements tg a Technscal Speef<atoris _ . . - . _ _ . . . _ t50 16 1 iq b Safety Goal Pmplementaton .. . - . . . . . .- . . . . . . . - . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . 0 .4 C inspecton/L4ensng intagrat@n aed Research &nc Sf aedads Cr,orcanaton .. . - . . _ . . 0 21 7 4 8 LKensee Reac1Dr Accdent MarW)ement Evaba%n a Concept o' Operatcos and 6mpieaw ,ng .. _ _ . . _ ... 10 1 b Aegional Ass, stance Comm.ttees ..... . . . . . . . . . . - .

22 9 Sa'eguards L(anseg anciinspect96 Reguaory ['WtWW Rewas .. .....{ 390 83

,g Total Part t 71. .... ... ..... ... . $2 928 153 7 E Part 179 ntvt by A[OO sProg*am Esoments)

! (

1. Performance inAa:nts _ . $228 39  ! 1 2 Chagnost< Evan,ahoes ..

3 incejent Irvreshcation._...

_q 0 50 20 25 p-

4. NRO Inuder1 Resporve . . - - . - _ - 1.129 27.1 k<

5 Tecnn T,a m c ~ . .U Ix2 2i G

..,J s cwa %na Data A%s.s . . . . . . - . 2.1 5 25 0 7 Ct+a*oa# Deta Coiecbon and C8sem nat on .

1.756 6.0 qt{ l w Pa, ,7, w woo .

$w9 i 87 5 AW 1

}

24064 Federal Register / Vol 53, No.123 / MondCy, June 27, 1988 / Proposed Rubs a

TABLE W.-.-PART 171 FCES BY CATEGORY-DETAtL-Continued

, (Doftars h thousands) .

, 1:Y 1988 Prevam s4 port dollars FTE D Totaf M1C for M Reectors:

l. Cost Icr AEOO Staff = 87.5 x 138.G _. $12.145 Program Secr1 AEOO.

7.379 Tota; AEOO Cost.

$19.524 s

2. Cost for 74RR Staff = 153 7 x 138 8 Program S@ ort MA . . $21.334 2.928 lotal NRR Cost

3. Cost for Research Sta4 = 118 0 x 138 8 /, $24282 Program SM Research $16.378

_ 66.411 Total Research Cost .

$63.189

4. Total (AA Reactors) Cost to NRC. $ ;26.975 K Pat !?I Wcri-Reactors East of the Rockes-Seisme and Fro Protectxn Research-Earth Soonced Cost of Research Stah = 3 x 138 8 $3.D0 30 Program Suppod

$418 3.290 5 I

Total Cost (Reactors East of the Rocus) $3.706 l

4 Mi Part til Wort-8&WRnectws Plant Perfornance (Research): '

a.14 37 ,-

b. 20/30 (10 percent of ettor13. . $ t,390 .5

c. Coneneng Emerexntal Capatsty 220 .1

d. Once.Through Steam Ger.e stor (B&W) 150 0 e Tectncalintegraten Center 229 1.7 900 1.5 .

Total Part 171 Wort. -8&W Reactors _

Cost of Research Staff = 3 8 x13e 8. $2.889 38 Proyam Sgpor' $527

, 2.889 Total Cost (B&W Reactors) - $3.416 fV Part !?I Wert-GReactcw Ptant Pe@rmanoac

a. 20/30 (45 percent of afforn

b. ROSA fv ard Other Foreegn Espurvnents (50%l $1.020 .7

c. Code Unoortaarty (fo%) 250 .2 585 .5 Tetal Part 171 Wort GE Reactors Cost of Research Staff = 1.4 x 138 8 $ 1.855 14 Program Supoor' $194

. _ _ . 1.855 Total Cost (CE Reactors) t1. Pat til wcrt->+esanghcure Rectors $2.049 Plant Per9ormance a 20/30 (45 percent of ettory

b. ROSA fV and Other Fore >;p Expenments $1.020 .7 e Code Uncertarry 250 2

' 585 5 Total Part 171 Work-WestrQhouse Reacicts . . _ _

$1.855 14 Cost of Research Staff = 1.4 x 138 8 $194 Program $m.

1.855 Total Cost (Westnghouse Reactor 4 ti. P4117f Mcrt--G #eactors. $2.049

1. Plant Portermance-Oevoicoment of Assessment of Codee . . . _ .

750 0 2 Reactcr Cor.tanment Safety-Code Models Vahdahon and Ana%.a. . _ . .

3 Genene and unresoW Safety lasues-4teactor Sa'.em ismes. 1.150 8 250- 0 Total Part 171 Wort-GE Reactors Cost of Research Staff = .8 s 134 8

$2.150 8 Prcgram Suprort... . . . . . . Sill

--...__ 2.150 Total Cost (GE Rea: tors) .. _ .._

$2.251 Due to the multi-recipient nature of ) car. This will allow for equitable fees. &ction 111.21 Refunds.

these NRC efforts: the need to collect established and co!!ected with the fees in a practicable manner: and OMD minimum resource expenditure; such Circular A-25. User Fees, requirements nis section is being eliminated.

expenditure affects overhead cost which Under current legislation, at least 45 for advance or simultaneous billing: Part must ultimately t>c recovered from all percent should be collected. No refunds l in user fees should be established and American taxpo> ers or from the will be provided. sithough the fees will i

assessed based upon the budget for that organizations regulated by the NRC.

l l

be calculated in such a manner as to not u

- 5

. Federal Register / Vcl. 53, No.123 / Monday, June 27, 1988 / Proposed Rules 24085 g I

greatly exceed the 45 percent "fioor" could be considered small entities. PART 170-FEES FOR FACILITIES i l imposed by the legislation. particularly in the area of materials AND MATERIALS 1.iCENSES AND l licensing under Parts 30-33 and 39. The OTHER REGULATORY SERYlCES I V. Er.vironmental Impact: Categorical annual record keeping burden imposed UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF Exclusion h I by the proposed mie will not be 1954, AS AMENDED f~ '

The NRC has determined that this increased for these licensees. L proposed rule is the type of action Any small entity subject to this 1. The authority citation for Part 170 1 described in categorical exclusion 10 regulation which determines that. continues to read as follows: )

CFR 51.22[c)(1). Therefore, neither an because of its size, it is likely to bear a I Authority: 31 U.S.C. 97o1, se Stat.1051: sec.

cavironmental impact statement nor an disproportionate adverse economic

3ol. Pub. L 92-414. 86 Stot. 2?.2142 U.S C.

environmental auessment has been impact should notify the Commission of 2201wl. see. 201,88 stat.1242. as amended a prepared for this proposed rule. this in a comment that indicates the (42 u.S.c. 5841).

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement I seds size and how the 2 In [ 170.12, paragraph (5) through (g) pre TeVised to read is follows:

This proposed rule contains no proposed regulation would result in a p information collection requirements and- significant economic burden upn the therefore,is not subject to the licensee as compared to the economic $ 170.12 Pay m W s. [t requirements of the Paperwork * * * *

• burden on a larger hcensee. .

i-Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et (b) How the proposed regulations (b) License fees. Fees for applications t 8@ could be nrod;fied to take into account for permits and licenses that are subject I Vll. Regulatvy Analysis the licensee's differing needs or to, fees based on the full cost of the, p capabiHties* reviews are payable upon notification  ;.

Secti.on 7%1 of COBRA required the by the Commission. Each applicant will NRC, by rule, to establish an annual (c) The benefits that would accrue, or l' the detriments that would be avoided,if be billed at six. month intervals for all charge for regulatory services pmvided accumulated costs for each application io 12 its applicants and lice,nsees, that the proposed regulations were modified L as suggested by the licensee. the applicant has on file for review by when added to other amounts collected. the Commission until the review in 7 equaled up to 33 percent of Commission (d) How the proposed regulation. as completed. Each bill will identify the costs in providing those services. modified, would more closely equalize applications and costs related to each. I; Section 5001 of the Omnibus Budget the impact of NRC regulations or c eate Fees for applications for materials F Riconciliation Act of 1987 requires that more equal access to the benefits of licenses not subject to full cost must U th1 NRC, for the hacal years 1988 and Federal programs as orposed 1 '

accompany the application when it is 1989, increase the moneys collected . providing special advantages to any fded.  !

pursuant to section 7001 and other individual or group.

cuthority to at least 45 percent of the IX. Backfit Analysis rtguired approcols. Fees for Cosnmission's costs. In order to

['

accomplish this statutory requirement. '

the NRC is proposing to revise its fee The NRC has determined that the backfit rule,10 Cl R 50.109. does not

[h u mvals ts I schedules in to CFR I, art 170 to remove for dismantling decommissioning and > (;

apply to this proposed rule, and termination of licensed activities that k the fee ceilings on certain categories, to therefore, that a backfit analysis is not rsvise its professional hourly rate to are subject to full cost are payable upon 4; required for this proposed rule, because notification by the Commission. Each reflect inflationary and other increases since FY 1981, to revise the ceiling of 33 these arnendments are mandated by 31 U.S.C. 9701 and section 7601, opplicant will be billed at six. month d percent contained in 10 CFR Part 171 to a target of which approximates but will Consolidated Omnibus Budael intervals for all accumulated costs for each application the applicant has on

]-

1 be et least 45 percent. and to include the Reconciliation Act of 1965 (Pub. L 99- fde for review by the Commission, until lk 272,100 Stat.146), as amended by the review is cornpleted. Each bill will A collection of moneys from the fligh section 5001. Omnibus Budget ~I Level Weste Fund admimstered by the identify the applications and costs Recnncibatmn Act of 1987 (Pub. L 100-fF

,,d e es sion will not 203 Stat -)-

related to each. Amendment fees for materials licenses and approvals not j

f have significant impacts on state and 1.ist of Subjects -

local governments and geographical accompany the application when it is j regions; on health, safety. and the fu CFR Part J.p fded.

3 rnvironment: or. crcate substantial costs Dyproduct material. Nuclear Rma Fees for j j; applications for renewals that are to licensees. the NRC or other Federal materials. Nockar power plants and suWct to fuH cost d e miew are

.y egencies. The foregmng d scussion reactors. Pen,dt v. Source material.

popble upon actifica@te a by the :y constitutes the regulatory enolps for Special nudcar mutenal.  ;

tha pmpmed rule. Comission. Each appocant will be in CFR Port 171 baied at siomonth intervals for all Vill. Regulatory Flexibility Certification --'

accumulateu costs on each applicaticr.

As rc<;uired by the Res!ctorv a. nfrem' " Pena;4Nudear ponerplWs that the applicant has on file for review Flexibibly Act cf 1980. 5 U.S.C.'to3(b), by the Cornmission unitl the review is <t the Comrnission cert; fins that this rule,if for the reasons rd o,t in the completed. Each bill willidentify the d, adopted will not hase a signihcant preamble and under the authority vi the @plications and the costs related to I nor.orme impact upon a subeanhal Atemic Enervy Act of 19M. as amer ded. each. Renewal fees for materials nember cf small r ntities. The proposed the Fcergy Rec ~;nnization Act of 197t br enses and approvah not subjet t to '{'

tule eIfects abot.t 10.000 sper.ific as amended. and 5 l'.S.C. 552 and 553. feil cost reviews must accompany the j Netwes under 10 Crit Parts 30-35, 39, the NRC is proposing to adopt the @ plication when it is fded. $)

44. 54. 00. tit. 70. 71, and 72 following amendments to 10 CFR Parts ((l APProcalfees. (1) Applications for

\ tpoumatcly 9 oiv) of 11 < se hc r nsecs 170 and 17t. n aportation ccsks. package s. and 7' r

k.

a 24086 Federal Register / Vcl. 53, No,113 /. Mondly, June 27, 1988 / Proposed Ruhs '-

shipping container approvals, spent fuel examinations and tests other required SCHEDULE Or FACsWTY FEES-Continued storage facility design approvals, and approvals and inspections under construction approvals for plutonium Q%170.21,170.31 and 170.32 will be tse loom o eo e ude) fuel processing and fabricetion plants calculated based upon the full costs for must be accompanied by an application rac% cos pnes and types of sees reni >

the review using a professional staff rate fee of $150. per heur equhalent to the sum of the irspect,ons s. p; (2) There is no application fee for average cost to the agency for a standardized design approvals. The professional sta ff member, including F. A**ced 8883**

review fees for facility reference salary and benefits, administrative standardized design approvals and support and travel. The professional 3,,gy,on w consuucen Pam s m ooo certifications will be paid by the holder staff rate will be revised on a fiscal year construcon Pernet. Operating ocense .

Amendment rene.v. otner Approves W

of the design approval or certification in basis using the most current fiscal data

~

inspecens '

W five (5)irtstallments based on payment W-available and the revised hourly rate --

~

of 20 parcent of the application end # #' " ####

will be pulished in the Federal Register approval / certification fee (see footnote for each fiscal year. The professional Appacation sor consnuction Perm *t.._ 5125.000 4 5170.21) as each of thefirst five units staff rate for the NRC fqr FY 88 is $a0 constructon Permit. Operating Ucease ..

of the approved / certified design is (') -

per hour. Amenomeat. RenewsJ. otner ApprovaC.. W referenced in an application (s) filed by a '#'"'*"S* O

, 4. Section 170.21 is revised to read as ~ L_

utility or utilities. lf the designis)is not follows:

~

I u proottron or curaron r,cery pennonentry referenced or if all costs are not cms,o w n recovered within 5 years after the I 170.21 Schedule of fees for production -. -

preliminary design approval (PDA) or and utatzation facilities, review of standard inspect.ons t.. - _ --_ ]-

the final design approval (FDA) the reference design approvals, special - -- -

W vendor applicant wili pay the costs, or pr Rets, and bspections. / Mh remainder of those costs, at that time. Applicants for construction per nits, The 5-year period is extended to in w.c.1,on and Reptacement Eww. l manufacturing licenses, operating rarans w 9eactor opnos- _q W years from the date of the design licenses, approvals of facility standard certification. reference designs, ter]uall'ication and # ""' N' (3) Fees for other applications that are replacement examinations for reactor wo,,, . _ j subject to fu.'l cost reviews are prvable operators, and special projects and g

_1 1 upon notification by the Comrnission, briders of construction permits. licenses. ' Fees ws not be cha geo 'or oroers assued by Each subject applicant will be billed at six-month intervals until the review is and other approvals shall pay fees for the following categories of Senicre.

• • @@g/;QQ.f,' "M**2n' commesson o,aers. Fees o be enargd, ro, app,r,ov.

completed. Each bill will identify the applications and the costs related to y [*y 3,75"l,"j.'l ,' 'P*C,4 "o'n"o',* ",$9'o'$

SCHEDULE of FActWTY FEES the caos d FesW Wgulations (e g, H 5o 12.

each. Fees for applications for materials approvals that are not subject to full 3,, ,omne,, , ,co g ,s j 7,3,s(a e

gasucg sectpy ,yng a

,orm ot a gens. ,monowit. ener of approve, coni must accompany the application when it is filed.

rac,,,ty cc.gones ano types av sees j ree,i . go,agton, g oort. orpo,myr g,, gnon u pg.., ,,, eu o,,,, onin,w g '

,,y ,l,as

(()Specialprojectfees. Fees for A Mur pmr Re,cws the applications for special projects sech as -

essance of a u poeu Mense ipeeraas V power top.ical reports, are based on full cost of Apphcaton for Constructon Permt......._. ' $125.000 *Thu "s".N 5"5're a kersee 100s os a atac receeveo now+w s u rate powwr hcense po**)

or a the tesicws and are payable upon conswcen Pm opwong h _ W tempore y Iraense for less than fui s po-or and s.t>

notification by the Commission. Each Am, nom,nt, pen. ,,, o,,mertung o,.

comm,$sonrg and Tem.nnon. otre } 7 *)ut,o,ngpgg

,., ge,.S. ,,e,oce,m,nw en,ougn tnai p ,oo applicant will be billed at six month W o es. M wnen othoney a granted for u w opeport N

> intervals until the review is completed. '"S"('*"*' M 8 Ch "**

Each bill will identify the applications

• 5u,$'n*a"t in.ne e u5"pn'"

o *"'po."*nor

, a pan,*c*ui, tur a sesno,,, g,r, cec, og,p g,y.. n snovio de w n u n oos of u rated po.cr. m and the iosts related to each. -- - - - - w8 *sts * ** k'"" *m to at mai ec.5e C

(g) Inspection fees. Fees for all routine Premmary D**aon 4crovals. F 'd and non routine inspections will be D"S" ^00' *** cenuaun - g n Ip",c,,r,**'""9

. , en "** " * * "

,, e, e,sw on op,soas,,3 o e desessed On a per inspection basis and Amnoment. Renewal. Ot%er Approvais a W prvessona,9,, svf bme and appropr*e contractwa kpport sen vies W. in no adat d We will be billed quarterly. Inspection fr es c r,st r,c*:enesearco neactor/crue rsu cra ges be sess enan s15o For tnose appt.cators are payable upon notification by the -

'""envy m tw me prvnsonal cat cours orpe Commisalon. Inspection costs include preparation time. time on site and Appuccon su consnucun rem 4_ J ss 00;I

,1 u,c,,,rfj ge y,,,d n g *,f g ,y ,f,3j, y 6cumentation time and any associated I"* "N,N',,$, ,9[$"

p p$4^8g'lsyyssgoW1,g>ur*2 comm.uerwg and Termneon, ou ; men r,,,, cos.3 ne,e ,e.ci,e an app: cme see contractual services costs but nelude -oc<ov at .- - -- - ' W coo esato reo s ey a sure 20. isea a tot the time invols ."lin the p ocessin2 and '*C'*"'-- U M insuance of s notice of violation ar civil o erm u,,

inc'o"c'"o P*cto, 9 tocseo es rea e9etse cate e tos ru.e ** not to b+o io v+

1. • 'c'n#**'u*p eo *to' r+

Penaltb, aon cara any pro'esu.ai rours cren*o on or 4ohcaton .... .... . . _ . . _ . . . . . s125m, cw v4 ewetv. are e t~s nee eai t usesseo

"" # "## o me f aae ecat+vro tv i 170 20 't s ra+e *a to

3. Sec'. ion 17020 ir tevised to read as Design 4frovil .......... . W ***W ^^ * * *

• erdo Consce'a"bon"mcreas9d or"oeJreaseo costs l follows -

Amenoment, pene.ed. omer Approvas ,' h tne Comm.ss yi Tre roe lor aace f scas rev ** te inspechoes L ...._ .. (')

i170.M Average cost per professional . . . . _ .

PMV.e in tne FEMriat R Gas E 7ER let tre ever1 a w--~~. rece= cove s a combinator. of kons.ng ee*~$ in a statfMur. c(4 ep keeseg pr as a nc,n p,q jess E paron Erv,cMent Piant l I ees for permits. licenses. - - -

w' ccon 6 concre per% .

r; sus

~

,, e te m. te mras or ot**'). t**Nes ,e,vo*3 a "

~000 t4 tne t amendments, renewals, special prop. cts constvt.on ewm6. One erg tw* . i m

Part 55 requalification and replaceraent A% oment. nen o. t.tw 4pp,e.es ' n r row,e,e m cioneaicov- e a3 c.osts ty in.s 'or meai.cer scuo#e e comses won and noes ' e scer aao sai+>am ^

i

. [ Federal Register / Vol. 53 No. 23 / Mombsy, June 27. 1988./ Pro osed Rales t 24007 N a specaons .M by idRC for t'e pepese o' )

rwww cv d a scense program inspw. SCHCOULE OF FEIS run M ATER'ALS U. SCHEDrm or FEES FOR MATER 4ALS 1.5- '

hans are per4ormed orngnout the ists term of the CEN SES AND OTHER REGtA.ATORY l'urnse to ensas to ve avrv.,nzad actvt,es are CCNSES ANO OTHER REGULATORY  ;

teng Cr/d>cted n &injrdance we lhe Atrmc SERV?CES-Continuod SERVICES-COntaAued E neruy Act (J 1954. as amerced, etner nr.ptaticA EmeruscA recJeotes or or%rs. end the terms tSee r.ctnc4es n et god of tatae) (See footnotes et end of tat 9el W c<. rotes of the tee.w3. hon <ceane re. ooc. -

tes that resst trca ttzdparty atnamns ws. not Campry of rretarians b:nnses and (y tre s* tart to tves pg, Categ.ry of tr.asenats 4anses ard ! p g, ,

We of fee 8 fype of fee 8

• C recton of ee reew cests for a recArrr.ary I -

rv tvtrovst PCap and te si cavgn approvan ,

' h; ti ' ) e o oaerced roccirrey, sor a renod of fue 0 a's other specal twet maw al C Lconses umasd ptrsuait to n years from tm appr7<61. escept that. 4f the desgn e hcermes. e< cept Sicenses a rttur. W res venced owrig r* it perr.d. 20 percent of the tcta! fl 32 72. 3213. and/or 3234 of p ueng specsas rvctuar rnesenes in Part 32 of os chapter autSorir.

ccses w'4 be payst4e by N hc4 der of desqn tpgqv. 6I ur seaWd lorm n conthinat;on eng tne pecessmg or menufac.

el ce certWe a* each rderence es mens ueth tne

• M M ConWe a mal Me and 6 of rempher UJ'ot W'e5EdTTo b",sM % "*c' e - ' w " g ceut.catm m:th the same prcrmo trer to cerant *

• a "'ad a i15a".

o' F*5 Ch*D' ' 'o' *$ch tre k us and/cr sources and ogeces s tne ws s we ba parat4e eacn tyre tne emn es censee Shas'ony the san.e ra:e [i contanno tweesact rasterat p refadenCM erw1 by the ervjtre theIlpphcabne of inO esemt the fullreCosts orator not recow-a,31 genod as Fial t?4for Categc/V 1 A' Aprecatio'New license '

ADplCath toense-.~ - . $1.ao0 [,

hokser of te oewon wprovas or (wrWcase must pav $350 Bene

• al ...._..J $1,4rA AmewaL_ '

$E AmendmW

>l t[trYP ***'*"*--..

$230 V A ti ns for erorm ts ks J$120 D Licenses and oppseva*s 'stsed F DA s and tettescarcru are s@9ct to fuli co,ts anc 2 60"'ce materia!

• gursuant to M32 72. 32 73. aW d 1I m1N be Ddled upon CONA Lc4 of the reviera A bcM.ses for possession and use ,

r

• Full cost of 32 74 or Pe't 32 of tNs chap. :

of sovce inater41 en recovery ter autvang distrto+cm of re- i coerefors sucn as rnung m su occ e ,recevtces. gmerators. L

5. Sectic ro.31 is revlwd 19 reud as '**ch'no heapaachno. remg reageat 6as encor ses or goW S Vanlurri mal Concentrples to ula. cences not mvorvmg pack *seng rren nos t tuorios. ore bWng i

of byprcdset musenal ,

sta%ons. son esc %gnge ta$tes Apoincator>-New tacease . -

f 170.31 Schedule of fees for vmt'ertals $100 Ecerises and othef regulatery services.

and in p;,c ,ng or or,s oc,n,.

ta.ning source eratenet for edrao-pene. g.._.. __ .J $70o ',

Amendment $120 A Pphcants for materials hcenws and '*"#**'* '#**"'*"'""' h or snorum. ve'"*ng bcenses e+ E pos sson and ne other regulatory services and hokim of orL'C"**

byprodsc 'O'a rna*tenas o swed r ai inc,ung tne pos.,esson at try. sc4rces ic, ,rasaton ce m a s.

materials licenses shall pay fees for the proo;ct messe matmal eaarngt j following categories of services. * 5" s's m avi te sosee es not

'"*'*^*' ' 'CN *d "0' Sh*'d IS** q opera $ons, aM tcernos author. ".c*4dc4 sh vrg' "S u.ng decomrw.scrong.

• sciama- :W Scotsouts os FtES FOR MATER 1ALS Li- bon or ressoreion sca-tes as Ag4scaton-New ttense - . ...j $230 none.au . $i70 d, .

CENSES ANo O rHER REcotAtoRY *****k*"5"*"N*

• Arr endme't-.-. -.--

. 8120 possesbon a'd mar.ter nce of SERVtCES F bcenses for pcssessaon and use

• a ta#fy e a standby rm e '

Apphcaton .... .. $150 of less than 10.000 cures of be prM matenal in sea u

~

T bcerine. Rent at Arrent, wnt .. .I ksa Coca

,c,fcg, gar gradaten of mates f Cat,epy ena B btenses 8ar fossesson a W use p posea at p g, , of source metenal #p sPmieng.

ais e v.hach tne source a 68-

__ encept es prowted for n poted for readauon purposes i Apot cation-br konse.. ..._..$560 t foetiat %cteer Va+ tai

• f170?Ilset Rene*at-ApphcsticrwNewr ecense . _ ...: See . $350 A Lcenses for pmesson and use Renemal. Amendment .. $2JO of 200 grar9s or mo'e 40 p69 tors

..] $ro Ci Uce%es for pct m m and Artendmoni . . . . . . . . . . . _ .

$60 i um n toseavd form or 3*C C AJi ot+er scurce matenat l- use of 10.000 cunes er enore of O'ams of Nre d Conts'ned 4 (cegeS bypro&ct raatenal en sealed -

235 en unseated form or Oc0 Apohcaion-New bconse .. . . - $350 sO/ces Por Fredation of mater >

grams or more d U-233 m un.

sgn,,, ras a s M *Nch tre towce e es-S**W '0"* U*S M'S 8PI** . . . . _ _ _ $230 posed for <rediabon surposes cr on ioie,.,naie xer.m and Amendmeat -

3 8,,,m,ena,

.-....)3120 Appbcaton--New bconse .

$ 2,300 M a@m 6 -w cg A bcenses of t/oad scope for pen,,,, o

' " ' '"' Amer @nevit $200 Sete re=Arataan E6 cts +s es moll Dossess<ri and use of t@roict j H bcenses ssa$ p.skant to l 39 kNI OWWOg PokiOS' ma'er.a! essued pWsi., ant 10 Fa'ts 30 and 31 d thes chag4pr for " $otfart A of Pa't 32 of trss i

• • " D Apphcation- - . - . __. DrCcessar19 or trenufact /ang of Cr@er b No ee*8 Cona- l taeneng bypro@ Jct anatored that {

bcense. Renews', Ameroment ..I$150 Full Coat nems cortawg b,prodsct rsa'e. reaure dere review to pe sors t 9 LEenses for receet nry) 34orage :

g4 y pgg,g pg.in to ; e W Pe A bee ms i re. l of .W Wala^ N M; ADcNator den ke956 ... ) $ 1.26/

r oiremaats of Part 30 of th:s i W bed SWW msWM f kem as . . . . .. , -._ _.. : $ 7M Chad'et esce01 SOecAC lee ^sCs N ' afhoryg redshbulon or items l Apphca w f A%,omer.t , tNit beve been saboraed for i ig op,, genge, ,c, gc umen ; $120 L canse Renewat AN. vent-- .I$150

' bd. Cost ,

c strb.cor. to persya aesmpt i C bcenses foe pouawea ano use 6  !

w a p t' gem N'er a' l '

hcM Pe keen'q reprernents ! I C'8 *pmal esJNear mate 4 mt  % g,suas e ret m c,e in.s . c' pa t 30 af in,s ct.ao:er cNn; r fy pecg655,ng or ma7u. i ADS;4tcr4e's hcense

• • wr wca emw = o+ 4 ,

faw; & -ns cow.y b,. i  % .y 3 $MIO oces uwd m an@>sy,af eneatW. I  ; proCf malenaf for comme'c.4- ._..__.. _ _ . i5230 09 IID *  !

65 Mouton tc b,,erisces Arno-enent. ~ . . . _ . .

..I $t20 ApcAcaSchNcn licese t $ 7 in  !

Nnne ad . ' pp gw4, gg . gg

' $120 he,ewar { t.

6'r*L -- J $460 1

! $'^ I Ar w*mrir... . _ . _- _._. ___,$t20 . v' l

n

.i e!

S -

24088 Federl Register / Vol. 53, No.1F.3 / Monday, June 27, 1988 / Propod Rules '

SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR MATERIALS ll. SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR MATERIALS Ll-C$NSES ANo OTHER. REGut.ATORY SCHEDULE OF FEE 8 FOR MArtRiALs ts.

CENSES AND OTHER REGULATORY CENSES AND OTHER REGULATORY SE RVICE S--Continued SERytCES-Continued SERV 6CES-Continued ISee footnotes at ord of tatN)

(See footnotes at and of table) (See foctnotes at end of tatise)

Catogory of matena's bcenses and __

type of fee ' p,, Category of metenais hcenses and pg Categry of matenahs hcenses and type of lee 8 p,,a tWe c4 fee '

L Lcanses issued pursuant to Sut>

Renewal $930 p'1 A of Part 32 of thes etapter bcense. renewat, amenenent .. Full Cost Amendment $120

% estreute stems contammg ty. O. tcenses tot possession and 6. Nuc# ear taundies:

proAct materal or Quanttes of use of byproduct rnater'af ssued A bcenses for commercial cosec-byproduct matenal that do not tion and laundry of some son.

pursuant to Part 34 of be chap.

ren,re device evaluation to per. tammated with thproduct matert.

ter for industnal redogsphy co. si, source matenal, or specal nu.

' sons esempt kom the hcenseg erstions.

ressrements of Part 30 of thes Apprecate-New Acense cieer matena chaoter. escept for senc<fic h- $700 Apphcaton-New Acense Renewet $700 $700 conses euthontog redstreuten Amendment Rerewel - '

$700

• $330 Ameneont of dems that have been author. P. AJ1 other speche thoroduct ma' $170 Lied lor estreuton to perus terial konses, except ihose m 7, Hurnan m of W source.

e ntret from the kensing re. Categones 4A througn got o, spec @ nuc$ ear manrW ouvements et Part 30 of th.s Appbcatco.-New hcense $230 A. beenses asued pursuant- to chapter-Renewel $t20 Pwts 30. 35. 40. and 70 of this-4ps.catoMW konse $290 Arnendment chaser for burnan use of by.

,Rene*at- $60

$230 4. Waste esposal-

• prMuct twM wee matenal Amendment $60 , or spec @ noctear matens e A. Ucenses specthca#y authormng J txenses saued pursuant to suo.. seaW sources contamed m le+

the receipt of waste bypromet part 8 of Part 32 of thes chaser material. source matenal, or soe. ino,,py m,c ,

to est-cute items conta.neng by. c@ nuclear rnatenal trom other Appkaton-Ne* # cense $580 poduct analenal that re w re persons for the purpose of com. Renews $350 seaand lurce ahd/or omce rnercial esposal t;y land bunal by t $230

{ reviErw to persons gener3#y b- tne kensee; or bcenses eVihon2 g ge j gggg censed under Part 31 of be mg contogency storego of low to medcaJ 'Astrtutions or hvo or crallpler, ascept spec'hc br,erses pu w to level reccactrve waste at the site authormrig seestrtubon of items of nuclear power reactors, or 6 that have been authonzed tor c4nses frr treatment or doosal

, Parts, 30. 33. 35, 40 and 70,of estreutnn to persons gen 6ra#y by mcmeranors pacs. agog of resi. and ecludeg ncensed unoer Part 31 of this dues resultog from ocnere' ion of product mal chapter except hcenses kit twroduci AppkaterwNew bcense.. ~.. and transr et of pedaQes to an.

11.200 other person authorued e re- M e ma W g spe.

Aenewal $700 cerve or $bpose of easte mater >

Amendment cat ruelear rnatenal m asaled

$230 'al g ,,,

h. tcenses ssued pursuant to Appi ,ation #*

Subpart B of Part 32 of the $150 Lcense. renemal amendment _ Fus Cost ApphcahNe* bcenses $t200 chapter to estnbute stems con.

8 bconses sp@ cab authoritmg D

• C ~~

temng byptoriuct matenal or the recespt of waste byproduct Amenoment_' -*

' quant $es of twroduct matenal, M matenal source matenal or see. C. Otrer hcenses asved pursuant that do not requee seawd scm. ace cial nuclear tratenal from othe, to Parts 30, 35. 40. and 70 of androe decce revww to persons persons for tre purpose of ped. bs chapter for human use of gers.ra% bcensed ur*r Part 31 byproict matenal sovce mate.

ag'ng or repactapng the maton, of ths cnapter, encept for spec

• al The ticensae we espose of c bcenses authonrog reestrto. nat and/or sNcial nuclear mate.

the tr:stenas oy trans*er to an. nal ecept konses for horce tm of items ihat have been av ether person authonzed to re. uct materal, source matenal, or tronzed for ostrcuton to per. ce.ve or espose of the matenet special nuc' ear tnatenal e sealed sons gererah bcensed under j PFt 31 of ths chapter Apphcaton-New hcerse- ... ....- $ 1.e00 sources contained e teietherapy Reneral . . . .1 decces Appbca$orwNew hcense .. . . . SMO .. _

Dene al .-.._

Amendment .._ .. . . ...-.. . . $930 $350 Appkaton.Aew acense $580 i

. . . ~ . ~ . - $230 C. Ucenses specs 4caPr authoneg Nene* aI-Amendment -_.. . $580 500 the rece.pt of prepech. aged east, Amandrnent L bronses of broad scoce for pos- $120 byprMuct frater'st source rP4te.

• Cml defenrie^

sesss0n and use of twrMUCi nal. or sp3CW nuclear mater'al -

A bce^ses Nlt possesSon and 4*se matenal asued pusvant to Parta l fror9 other persons The konee of bypWuct n'etenal sowce 30 amt 53 of th*s Chapter for I we drSpose of he ma'ena' by .

rew.areti 3rgt devotopmerst trat l matertal, or speCAal nucisar male.

transfer lo another persy ate ; nel for Csvil deten6e acmes.

do not a thorUS Comemc.at $$ I thonfed to re(eNe of Cspo%e of .

t*tiutcn.  ! ADohcatorwNew hCen6e . _ - . 1290 the trater@ Aseenal , ..

App %iton--New kense . .!$1200 Appbca50n-New hcense - $230 Renew al .

- 500 Arverynco - $60

..!$700 A anem al - . ' $4M AmeMmont . . i $tf) 9 Devge prod 41 or sea'Cd source M Otner vemes for Mssessen ,

Amenoment _ _ '$t20 sane ty evabadon 5 We8t iogoeg 8 a^d bse of twrcwAct myced! , A Sa%ty eva:uaton of devices or 1 A. LCenses scecrf<aN a# Wing i prCMts CortaNig byprodJct issued pssuant to Part 30 of ttws ! use of Dypr<4uct r*4tenat vurce !

cupw kw resecen and deve:. . materat and/or spec'ai rue' ear i mm ar 4 source rna'enal or spe.

oprrwt that do not actvie { cw nuc4 ear recerat onceot re.

rP4'er al for well b)?nQ.

• c8 su'* ecior fuel d@ces. for commer.

corarvec@ det!tivton  ; veyi and tracer studes other App.<ation-New hcer.se .I$700 c:41 Orstr%5on.

parvev than Iesd flootbrsg tracer stvees

.J $460 Appi<a.on.Neo kcense - $700 AWav-.each doece .. ._ . $ t A)O Ameedment . . ....._  !$120 Aene at.. Arnendment-each derce .. .... $580 N t<-enses that &#orge prwes ! ~j$700 g g,,y 33;gagnn og ce,c,, e, Amendment . . - . . . - - 4$170 for otter hcensMs. encept for j 8 LCecsos speAaby aJW7'eQ ! p,,g 3 enn,y,rg twroduct lean tesFrg and mas'e ogM ' use of t'yprodXt r"4ter al 80' ' mver@. inu ce r 'PrerQl. or spe.

Nuo sCMes j r.cM hooding tracer stu@es M par m4'erW manh.

AppRawJee kann .. -.A$W tured A aC the I Wica?on - ..._ l$500 yn ,p,y,,Cordarce asth,cpon, c4 g to, [

_ J&

Tedir:1 ReMstr / Vol. 53 No.123 / Monday, June 27, 1988 [ Proposed Rules 24089 '

SCr1EDtJLE OF FEES FOR MATERIALS Lt. 8 Mes d fees-Separate ceerys as M n accomoaM by me presented amendment fu 6 I the v>eM we be awssed for a.vceons for the lower fee category.

CE.NSE S AND OTHER REGULATORY nu hcenses and approvts. issuance of new k-

• Fees win not te charged fu orders issued by SEfMCES-Cont 6nued censes and approva:s, and amer.dmen's and renew. We Corrmssion pes.sant to i 2 20a et Pai 2 nct ice a's to erstry vcenas ant

• scorova's Tte ,onenwJ amendments ressteg specifica% frorn s(cn Corn- ,

15% fcot,otes at end of tab'el gud*ws aWr to Nse chap s me um However. fees W be chaw W L, ,

spcrovals issued pwsuart to a encAc esernpton b (a) AMcawt kes-Acc4 cations for nee maten-ats hcenses'and approvs's or tnose anol.catons faed mson of me Comsson's rWons unk T,tw l Cawjary of rnaws hcemes and } rgi en suppet of espred bee %+s and arvosass must De to of me Code d Feoerad RegWatons (e g ,

ft pe d 'W ' l Aco11panecd by the prewbed aMcabon fee far 59 30 11, 40 14. 70.14. 73 5, and any other such

, each catagory. except tr.at apc+catsons for hcenses secticns non or heree' tor in eftect) r ard'eas of u e by a sNe imp 6 cant. em :rt ; cweg more tnan one fee cawgory of specw whomer me approval is r me Wm a herse rwear mater a! or so,.r ce tr.atere must be accom- a*r.6.idment, le' tar of approval. . safety eva) oat on 4 C.* W N'S i pWd by the p' esc 4ed appl'ceton fee tc' the report, or ot$er form. In addmon to the fee shown. '

Ac+eest.on-4 ach nevice . 5300 hgrest fee cati gory. an t.pphcant may be assessM en addmonal fee for AvenJmer t-ev.h deoce . '$290 m g,.>se/apperar fees-For rew Ircenses and sMed swee and device eva6ations as shown n C SWy erh abon of seaid i amorais issued n fee Categones 1 A and 18. 2A. Categes 9A through 90.

tosces cor.tarvr1 hTrodxt A A. 59,10A,11 and 12. tre recoent tratt

, [

tre 8 Ful cost ftes wil be determined based on me rover: 41, soifce malena!. or sco. lt

}

bcense or approvst fee as oeierrraned by the pro 45sional sta81 time and appropnate Contractual y c.S near reew, e, cept re I rouca in accordance wtn i 17012 (tn. tot and (9 suppcv1 sernces extended por reven ca tre accua-at act fscl. for commerc.al d %n. (c) Aenewat / peg -Apc4catons for renewaf of tra. tiort. For tho6e appheathes aprent'y on ide and for twt (n. tena's hConses s'id approva:s mJSt be actornpan ed M@ W M dMemed bad on he M cW Ap#catweac*n source $350 by the prescrbed renewa' fee scr each category, emed fu the Mw, me proJemal M Ws q Amendment--eAh s&fce _ $120 a r a ense a .f da e tr rule wR be 0 W aW d Mad 4 1C A. af d Il rCU%t De aCCor ed by an aDMCkt.c#j profesNonal rate g for tha June 20.198a to#ces cor W g typrodsct fee of $1M w aJ1 the batance due upon nolf.cabon rule For those accecations currerttfy on file for  ;.

treenal source mateW, or SC+ by the Comer.assson in accordance wth the proce- r ccsa W M M en W WfH Cal nuclear mater @, manu4c- outes specAea in { 170.12(d). ce ang had by me M M N Me. M ,

.l 9/ed m accordant.e ath tne a4 sWI pending Cornpietion of the review, the Cost (gy A.ngg,Nnt fees-Apphcatior,s for amend. N;3d after the cesitng was reached L@ to the '

uneyse speCffications of. and t0r rne^ts must te SCCompensed by the presCnbed erfectNo date d hs Me WW not be bened to the u?e by a seg'e aMcant. eccept amendment fees An apptcatson for an amendment (

apphCant. Any prMessJonal hours espended on or A rf actor fuel. to 8 IPcense or approval etassfed in incs0 than one a'ter the effective d4te of thrs rule wil be assensd Arg;lic4%n--#iach soJrce.. _ $t75 cawgory Nst te aovpaned h the presenbed at the rate estabkshed by 9 170 20 of this part. The uneNmenbeW wee . ' MO amendment tee for the category affected by the rate unit te revewed and adlusted annually as rec- >

a unless N emeNet is apphcaue to essa'y to take mm considerston mcreased or de. 4 10 Transu/taten of radioact><e ma

• two or rnore fee Categones n w'hCh Case the Creased costs to the Comrnisason. In no event w41 AW fee V the highest tee C#egory would the total reyes Costs be less thart the appica!O A. Eratuatson of casks. pactays. app'y. ercept that apo6es..ons for amendment of 6

and s%ppbg cordaMr$. bcenses en tre Categones 1 A and 18, 2A. AA, 58- fee. The potessenal rate we be pubhshed n the FEDERAL ME(FsTER for each fiscal year.

Apphcabon . . . . . . . . . $150 10A.11. and 12 rut te accompar.ed by an apple. p Awoval Ren6wal. Amendmeat . F ull Cost ' C8t'on fee of $150 w th toe ba'ance due upon

• Licensees paying fees under Categoree 1 A and g not fe ation by the Comrnsson in accordance with 18 are not subtect to fees under Categones 1C ard - p 8 Evduab d Part 71 M'tf 88' g tN 12(c). 10 for sealed sources authon2ed in the same li- a ssance programs Cense eroept in enose instances n when in acceca- 1 l Appl cation-New bcense _. ... . $150 An app 6 cation for amendment to a rnateres h- en dess orisy wm the sease sotices author 2ed cense a awovel that wovk1 place the bcense or [:

Renewal... . . .- Full Cost a by the bcense. Apphcants for new hcenses of renew.

Arnendment M Cott s apVcival M a hgher fee Category cv add a new fee al of ertsbng WS that cover both byprorkct 11 Rev'e* of s s tion ee for the Ca wdl pa Aeah n e i.ceses avlsoom ap.ce opr foreuse am,o,gau,gog o ,eeewa d , fso, fee Ca Appkaton_. .. . ..._. $150 ,,ngs gna,,o, e.,programs, io te,m when no d smantieng or gory IC only. #

Approval. amendment. _ . Fun Cost 3.co,,j,,. tion p'ocedtres is regred. Shall not be 12 Specarproects 8 subsect to fees. .1!

Aepuc aton. -. $150 An appucaton for amemment to a keense o' Apovad ..

approviis that wrud reduce t+w scope of a bceas-

6. Section UO.32 is revised to red as f-

.- .... ] Fue Cost ee's program to a lower les category rnust be IOUOWS ,

t h UO.32 Schedule of fees for health,and safety, and safeguards inspections for materials licenses. ,

SCHEDUt9 OF MATERIALS LICENSE INSPECTION FEES ~4

's (See footnotes at end of tawel r I I

Ca'egory of hce%e Type of mspection i f ee 8 -

Q# ,j J

t i

1. Se. sat nuc. car matenal ( 5 A Liccases for posses >on and use of 200 g a+s or more of putontsro in v asea ed *orm or RoLthe .. , Fuu cost * .

Per in*pecom  ;-

3tc g ams or more of contained U-235 n unsealed Ism c. 200 g ams or mcre of U-233  :.

n uwaw form Th.s mcwes appe<ato,s to terwate accoses and to amoree ,

(Wommssonog dsontammation rec amaton, or Me restoraSon actetes as well as ! '

l. -

i ice %es autoovW possess on on'y I No-out.v .. a .. . do _. _...J l

Do h'[ 7 e teeni.es for reu ,-t a,d weae o spent w at an ndese,oant scet te swage ' Acene .. -

.. do - - - - . . - Do ' E =:

muation osrSo I r-

Novc.e tre . . .. e ... Oo.

[3 C use,es .0, -seno, s,d me a .pe ~ce ~~ ~ smes eraa n-e _ -, m 0_ ._ - oo ,-

m dev<es used in andJstna' rneaefmg sys'emi D AX oner specia' ruc. car roa'ena! 6.ceaes. except bceases a#one'ng toeva rucear n' w. ..

n o,tae _

lm q $200.. .

oo Do, toa'enal

- n 50 ii n unsebed e ns Cwer formfo, en Comt>naton ww me ion %ee that woud

- pa,Consti.ite a, ececon a Cr:tCai fee ca,eQsa%ry med y 45 de'w;

h( .

kh tuc Cost memw eaw wategoy 1 A l l e me wo oo.

/

. ?!

t

!}

t 1

2 w ,

. _ . , _ _ _ -- _e

. -, ~. .o , .,~....,,3...m ,, - , . . g.,n, u h u 3 SCHEOuti OF MATERIALS UCENSE INSPECTION FEES-Continued (See footnotes at end of latse)

Ca:egory of Econse Type of mspection 8 Fee 8 E'Q C' 2 $wrce materiet A

t i

bcenses for poscessm and 644 ci source raatertal h recovery opersoone suas as Rousne . Nt cost

• truttang. r situ teachng ar.d hospieacewng. rewng urarmuri trus concentrates to werwurn Do.

l u henan onde. ore buyeg statons. ion enchange facetns. ed h procesorg of ore

) coniawig source matenal for extracton d nurtats other tran uranium or thonurn. nclu6ng i scenses authonzrg the pouss.on of bwroduct waste material (tatsng) frorn source I

matenet reewery operstons, eN Scenses authr;nzmg decorrvnssm reclamacon or restorabon actrees as wot as konses authortzeg the pos, esse and mantenance of a

! 8ecAty n a standby tr' ode.

Noneouta= 4o Do.

B. Ucenses for poss+ssen snd use of source matenaf for shooid.ng. except as proeded for Routine $130 h j I10.11 tax 8). . Do, Nonpousne $160 Do.

C. As ocier source ma'enal heenses. . Routine $370 Do.

3. 05 product matenet Nonrouune_ . $690 Do.

A bconses of broad acc3e fcs prossess on and use of bypro&ct materelissuod pesuant to Rousne. - $950' Do.

Perta 30 and* 33 of the chapter for procesoni or enanutacturing of dams contareg byprodect na.enal for comareroet ostnt:vnon to hcenses.

Norroutme $1.000

• Oo.

O Other teenses Me pc,ssesson and use of trproduct materW issued pursuant to Part 30 of Routme $4805 r

IPus chaser br prncesseg or manu actunng of itsms conterwng tryproduct metened for

_ 04 ~

corrrnercas' dstreuton to hCon60et Nonroutne . . $900*.. Do.

C. Oce'ees assued pursued su H 32.72. 32.73 and/or 32 74 of Part 32 of ths chapter Routme

$640. Oo.

ev.nonzmg the processang or manufacturvv3 ano estreute of ra6opharmaces,tcals.

{ generators. reagent Lts s,vj/or &nices cor'ta<ry g bypro$uct enghnal

'} Nonroutine $950 Da O. Ucenses and approvalissued f:ursuant to H 32.72.02.73 and/or 32.74 of Part 32 of this Rousne $370-Do. -

chapter authertzrsg asetjution of rasopharmaceuticJs. generators, reegent hea and/or sowces or dences not kvo8vmg processkg of bypro&ct materet.

Norroutme $530. Oo.

E. Uosnees lor possession and use of bypro&c1 matenal m seafed sources for tra6aton of Routre . $210.. Do.

erstenais n vehich the source is not removed from its thseld (setsNeided urvtsk -

Norroutsne $320 Do.

F. Oosness for posseesson and use of less then 10.000 cures of bycroduct mater,al en Routre *

$270 Do. '

seased sources lor readatio9 of metena.a in whch the s wrce es exposed lor traea$on

<. pwposes Norrouhne. $580.-- Do G beenses for possess.on and vae of 10.000 cures or more of byproduct marortef in Rotene $480 On sourens for tradaton of matenais n m%ch the source es esposed for tradation purposes .

k Norvouene $640. Oo.

H. Utenses ssued pursusant to sutpart A of Part 32 of trws chapter to estrtute stems Routme $320 Do.

containmg trproduct matenal that require device review to persons esempt from the boenseg requrements of Part 30 of thrs chapter except specsfic brenses authorreg roostnbuton of stems that have been autflonzsd for estrechon to persons esempt trors t*te bcensmg re@rements of Part 30 r.: this chapter.

Nontou'rlo - $320. Oo.

l. Ucenses 4 sued pursuant to subpsrq A of Part 32 of tNs W$r to ostrtute derns 1 Roudee .. . . . - . . $210. - .-... - Do contameng tgpr@3uct ma'enal or mant$es of tgproduct mater 41 tiet do not reQuae device '

f evaluehen to persons erempt from the tcerwng reouirements of Part 30 of ths chaotar. *

) encept specif=c bcenses authorreg redstnbutson of demo that have been authorzed for estrtjubon to petons s'aompt (3m the kens.ng requaefrients of Part 30 of tris chapter.

Nonroutine ..

$320 -. Oo.

J bcenses issued pursuant to steoart 8 of Pai 32 of thes chapter to $$9buto ete+s Rout'ne .. .. $320~.. . _ 0o.

contameg thproduct material that reqvre sealod source and/or oevice revew to persons I gnneraPy hcensed under Part 31 of ins chapter, ercapt touche hvenses autnunzng y '

redawbution to persons geeera'!y lice %.,d ur' der Pad 31 of tNs c8 sad *er. I I Nor$routird . $320 . . Do A bconbes 4%sved P644049t to subpart 8 of Part 32 of thes chapter to esittuta Jems ! AxtM.. ... . __ $320 ... - 00 corda.nsrq r vproduct material oe QuantAes of bypre3uct metonaJ that do not rewre va e1 !

l source en( 3r deece revcw to persor s genera *y bcensed un0er Pa131 of tres chasser. I l

encept spf * 'enses Authonfiry redestituton to persor's gener&Py kcerned ur W Part I 31 of this  ; 1 I

Nuyout f.e .. ' $320 - ..I Do I UCenses of broad sCoc9 for possJtsson AM use of brprMuct reaNf 4! :ssu<,J pe r set to p cot < e .

Paris 30 and 33 of ttw crapter for reseaes acJ oe. writ eat co rut a /nor re '

_ _ . ; $420 . .} Do c0mtvrC't.l hirtut.jn

! l,

.' Nor4 x*.rse .. .J $$M . ...._.....I Do 1.8 Other bcensos tor possesson aN uw. of bpAct ma'enal 'ssa pursvant to Pad M of t Rxtee .~ _ _ 1 $370-.~... - _ .1 0o trts Chapter for researcM and One9pa ent t*at oc rot a # cree c'V"rPerc'a! o St't'.M: 4 . I

! N wxtn .. s4:0... ,

Do N beenMs that eu'torge sewes for oa cr kerse., cac(pt Mr led testeg and *4s'e ' F. outre .-  : $320 - q Do esposal pd up PMCes .

l l l.

'  : Noree svc. _ oo O breases for possm, and use of te.:t - m eu wsar: to Paq 9 d t*. s j RNt re , SW Do chaple for edAtrJ' radef 3.X y oft &'Vf s '

FederaLRe$ter /' Vol. 53. No.123 / Monday, June 27, 1988 / Propos:d Rules 24091-

[ ?.

SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS LICENSE INSPECTION FEES--Continued (See footaotes at end of table)

J ; l ihl l Category of Icense Type of espectaon 8 ' b Fee 8 J'"Cl f t'

[

.I Nonroutme . .

$t.2006 . ...... Do. il P. M W.or specer.c t yprcdxt matere hcenses except those m cate7Jnes 4 A through 90,. ... Routne $530 Do. .,.

Nonroutne_ $530.

a waste 6soose Oo. o j[

t '!

A bcenses specsficatty autnormng the recept of waste twrock,ct mater.al, source watenal. Routme Futi cost

• Do. p.t or specal ruclear matenal from other perscrs fe the pu pose of commerce csposal by land bunal by the hcensee or scenses authoreng ccsu.g-4 storage of tow aevel i re$oactrve wastes at the site of nucsear power reactors. or hcenses for esatment or esposal try runeration, pachqng of rendses, resurbng from mesneration and transfer of f  ;

pacups to anothe: person authonted to receve or espose of waste rnatenal, {i Nonroutne do' Do. [

B bcenses spOfca#y authonnng tne recept of waste byproduct matenal, sovce matenal. Routme $1,000. Oo. l or specW nurJear matenal from other persona for the purpose of packagmg or reoackag- * ,

6no the materal The hcensee wW espose of tie metenal(py transfer to another pe' son ' ' '

, t authonted to recere or ospose of the matenal '

C

.c

. . Nonrouting .- , $740 Do. . f C. beerses spectica#y authonreg the recept of prepackaged waste thorod.ct ena'.enal. Routne 1 . _.... $740 Do. - 9 sosrce matenat, or special r*sc' ear rnatanal from other persont the bcensee we espose 0' of the matena' by transfer to another person authontsd to receve or espose of the j mstenat Nonroubne $950 Do v '

5. We# togrrg A bconses uw specAcany authormng of byproduct matenal, source matenat. andtor special Routne i

$370 Oct  ;

nuclear mattnaf for wea son won surveys, and tracer studes other than head hooong '

i ,

tracer stuer s. ,

Nonroutme $370 j '

Oo. p f B. Ucense speo .cany author rmg the recept of prepack. aged waste byprooset matettal tor feid hooeng tracer stu$es Roubne $320 Do. g l l

Noorovene $480 00  :

6. Nuclear laundnes.

A Lcenses for commerce cocec006 and launJry of APms contamested eth byproduct Routne . $630 . Oo.

[

matenal, source matenal, or speoal nuclear matenat. '

Neroutine $850. . . . . Do.

(( f' 3

7. Human use of byproduct source, or special nuctear tra'and A bconsee saued pursesnf to Parts 30. a0. and 70 of this chapter for hrnan use of by. Roubne - -

$530* ' Do. *

'~ [~ ' '

I prodtet ma'emat. source maiornal. or speciel nuclear matenal #1 setied sources cuitarned in teletherapy devcet . ;, i <

Nortrout no $850 _ . Oo. , .

8 beenses'of broad m: ope issue'd to'rtWocal astrtubons or two or more physbans pursuant Routne . $740 to Parts 30, 30. 35. 40. and 70 of thts chapter authortzing research and de,etoment. . . Oo. . '

i 1 1

inch,$ng human use of byproduct matonat. exceg bcenses for byprod.act ma*er.al, source " '

matenat or spec ai nucseer matenal in seated sources contaened in te'etheraphy devices.

C. Other ker $.s 6ssued p/suant to Parts 30,35. 40 and 70 of tws chapter for ts. nan use Routne Novoutee .. $800.

$480 Oo.

Do.

I-- " -

of byproovet matenal source matenat. and/or special nuclear materut, except beenses for I' typroduct matenai. source matenal. or speoe' nucear matenal n seanod sources con. '

tanned in teetherapray devicet .

Noorostee $690 Do. -l

8. Ovd defense Oconses for possessson .ind use of byproduct matenat source matenal. or specW nucaear Routme _ $300. Oo.

matenal for civd defense actry ties. ,

Noneoutne. $ 320 ._.. ... . . . . . Do.

9. DeviCo. prodJCL or sealed to#Ce sa'ery evaival@n- Safety evaluatco of devices. products Dr No espec0ons . . . - . - . . . - .

sealed soJCes Contacing tproduct. sour:8. or specW nucMar matenal, etcept reactor fuel Conducted 10 Transpcrtation of radoact,ve man. net  ;

A Evaluation of Casks. paChages, and shipong Cor(acerg ,

ma - p.u - ,ya _ epreaes_ _

,a,. 00 .,,,,,,

h 3 .'

60 . . . . . . . . - . . .

11. Review of standar$ red spent fue' ' ace t+s . ... I

. rio .. _ . _ ... ._ I 12 Specalpeqects

- . - . . _ . . - . . . . _ ... .) oo

.. ... ...._.._..].  !

I - 3 t5 trw ops Or in!oedonMSMait? chaf 9f s el be ass *sSed icv eace FCK!tr'io a^d non ro@ne inspectCn w*d@ es cC? formed, except those evestigatsons CCnickd .3 w"4 of irwestphons N

• tot;tne r*soectFs tnal re?)t f'orr t*s?dW*i a"ega*.Or.s el: net t< fle04 to 4+s j I H a hcense hNs more tPt.'s crf rna:eq s %ce^$e M a s;'96 locahon a fee e4.,8 to t*ND n7est vee cow, co.e ed by t*e i.ce,*s .isi be essened if tie '

er+pecrons af tr CoMucted a' the f.we tre. capt e Ca4s av tne enSNcLO9 recs are Cased or. tre hs8 Cost to Conduct t*e nspecton s 5 eps for all roctne and ncArDutme espottor'3 w* te af str$ted on a per inscecWn t;hs ,

• he le*s af sossej 81 full c(st a4 be daterr'tr.e(' basec 09 the p'ofss0)nad stpH twt ( rWed to cork

• sci t*e erss;.e;$0a m.it<4ed by the rate estatAsted . t'*

l

' uw i t 70:0 of nrs part. to c<n a y aopreora cont actua wro1 sewe co+ts exunt u te med ms ra e *o t+ reve.ed a o avs'ed sne va% as F rc; essa") to tante oto considergMn eres that benetst eastern reactors.

I171.21 (Removed) For the Nuclear Replatory Comrnisalon. Editorial mese: The Following appendhes

10. Part 171 is amenr'ed by removing Samuel J. Chl!L. will not appear 6n the Code of Federal i 171.g1. Secntary of the Cotr:missiva R '8"'* *

• Dated at Rohille. Maryland this 20th day of June 1988.

AppenJix A-Reactor Facibiles RANGE OF PRESENT FEFS UCVPARED WITH RANOE Or Fiscal YEAR 1988 PROPOSED FEES 6 Wwrie 1964 Rar9r of f es Range of FY 1984 fees Wnder Tyre c4 rewe rv serge sme) prW rue From f To From f To A Powe,,eaciors Operatog hcenea 8 rev en.. ._... ... . .... ._.-. - ... ... l

..] $ H 7.000 $ 5.552.000 $3.077,400 5 t .3 78.000 $9,3 M.00J tcense amenomws erwt otrer approsa's (per apphcaw)8 - . . ......_.a ... 150 164,600 inscecuor's

• 232.000 150 2s7.000 Noutsna .. - { E8 000 460.0C0 300,0C0 Non rowt.ne ... 83 000 697.000

-)

.. 2,6o3 395.000 ta) 3.800 544.0C0

1

, o a '

• o e Federal Register / Vol. o3, No.123 / Monday, June 27, 1988 / Proposed Rules 24093 i; L

R ANot oF PRESENT FEES COMPARED WrTH R.wot or Fiscal YEAR 1988 PROPOSED FEES-Continued [l

[

Rarge of lees (Asw 1984 Range of FY 1968 toes under

[

Type of reme or sonru ## '

0'# '"*

From To From l To

[

B Research reactors I Lcense arrenoments ard other aWo s:s (per apphcation) . - 150 1.900 42.100 150 2.400 t inspections a j Rovane . . _ 600 6200 '3.200 900 9.300 <

Norrowe ._ .. .__ . . . _ . . _ . . .. .._ 53 2.000 (*) B0 3.000 C Part 55 earwces 8. . .. _ . _ . _ _ _ . . . . . . J 600 257.800 147.000 900 323.M i k Topical and other reports arv3 rev.sou to reports . _ . . . _ . . I 150 146.500 20.000 150 t 89.600 1

8 The tvvent erus prwesed range of tees shoen represents NRC costs for cwdeled licenseg rewens throtsgh esmance of the 100% power bcarse One OL sgsk.stson, whch a siis weergorg recew. had cuts treou@ Oscereer 1946 of 18 7 fronen i 8 The casford and prcoosed range ce tees shown represcrit M4C cats ear corr 049ed arnendment actons N case, w+dthis 344 trWeppong remew. had Costs l Port o cerrem teac of approorneie+y5500.000

• The anmns shoen s taased on fees for a 1. year prrro ,

! l

• Fue cost ,

\

Appendix B--Fuel Cyde Caes  ;- l RANGE OF PRESENT FEES cot #ARED W'TH RANGE Or FISCAL YEAR 1988 PnoPOsco Ftts

! Range of lees Jwne 1984 Range of FY 49681ees urcer schose Jwne 1984 proposed ruse Ca'e FF %q

. Fvorn l To Fvorn { To t

Scw.atM+or Unrena!

1 A (Formorty 1A.ft)

New bcenses ._.. . - . . . . _. $167.200 5268.000 (') $190.300 $405.800 .

Rarwweis .. ..._.. . . _ . . . . _ . _ . . '14 290 $ 543.600 . _ . _ . . . '19.600 Q Amerrwerts _ . _ . . _ . _

.. .. . l . 58 3.70^ 'do.0CC 80 5.m Mrpec ky*

Routine .._ -

_ . . _ - . . . ' _ 1.670 ' 56.300 1 PO 000 ' 2,500 B4.M .i Nontwene .._ . .. .. . . . - _ . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . -

1 59 6.500 (') 240- 9W Sarce Matmal

• 2A (Fornwty 2A.?E) '

7eew bcensas .. . . _ _ _ _ . . . _. (') (') 341.000 ' ( ') 1 Honewv as .__. .. .. _ _ __ .. . ._ _ . . . . . . . 18.100 , 243.700 140.600 24h00 317. 2 Airw<arnents _ . _ . . , _ . . -.-. 150' 15.100 103200 150 27.800 {

inveranca t' Routvw .. _ . . _ _ . . . ._a.._ 53 12.500 (') 80 16.800 Peon rWrw . . . . . . . . . _

• 71

, 4 600 (~~ ) 560 7.000 T'sWJ!WS 10A (Former$y 10A-10E)

Agrrovst - . --

150 43.500 164.000 BC < 67.900 Henewal. ..__ . . . _ , . . . _ . . . . _. .. . . . . - (') (') 1.400 ( ')

Aenerwpent . - _ . . . . . . . _ . , . . . _ _ . 58 15.300 43.000 80 , - - - - . . 21h00 12 Special protnta _ _ ... .. . - . . _ . . _ . . . . _ . 290 424 000 20.000 400l 443200 f I __

' Bawd cri one cowed action en 15$6 e to comraeted acsons et 1996 8 F us cost i

I l (W Doc. Bh-14335 Filed M4.m. 8 45 am) f Cuisseo Coot F5so41.ad 3

( f t

l

\

l l

l  ?

d p!a i i