ML20150B911
| ML20150B911 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 03/10/1988 |
| From: | Wenslawski F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Andognini G SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803170183 | |
| Download: ML20150B911 (2) | |
Text
-.
~
g
.'.!AR 101988101988Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Sacramento Municipal Utility District 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 Attention:
Mr. G. Carl Andognini Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NRC/SMUD MEETING This-letter confirms a meeting to be held as agreed in a telephone conversation between myself and Mr. J. Firlit of your staff.
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss implications of the February-4th potential overexposure event as described in Licensee Event Report 88-03.
The meeting is scheduled for 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, March 16th at the Rancho Seco site. As discussed in the telephone conversation, we reauest that SMUD be prepared to discuss the issues identified in the enclosure to this letter, as well as any other matters associated with the event that you consider pertinent.
Please' advise-us promptly of any changes that could effect the scheduling of this meeting.
t>:yv :,.--o n F,A ',' W pjyy F. A. Wenslawski, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosure:
as stated cc w/ enclosure:
R. Croley, SMUD J. Firlit, SMUD J. Vinquist, SMUD S. Crunk, SMUD l
G. Knighton, NRR State of California REGION V jf i
FAWenslawski/ dot AD hnson g).4 3//o/88 3/d/88 j
i q
8803170183 880310
/
PDR ADOCK 05000312 l
S DCD
t 9.
Agenda SMUD/NRC Meeting - March 16, 1988 A.
Provide SMUD's basis for continued confidence in the capabilities of the radiation protection program, including craft workers adherence to procedures, in light of events leading up to the potential overexposure that occurred on February 4,1988.
B.
Provide SMUD's assessment of the effects of recent changes in personnel in the position of Radiation Protection Manager (e.g. staff morale, management direction, etc).
C.
Provide SMUD's evaluation of the need for additional QA involvement in light of commitments made to NRC during an enforcement conference on September 28, 1984 as discussed in NRC inspection report no.
50-312/84-25.
D.
Provide amplification of the training program outlined in LER 88-03, e.g.
priorities and scheduling and the training to assure that all radiation protection technicians are well versed in the hot particle control program prior to being assigned to a job involving such controls.
E.
The thrust of actions described in LER 88-03 all appear to revolve around the context of a hot particle control program.
Since several of the contributing factors to the February 4th event are not necessarily limited to hot particle situations (i.e. poor communications, poor shift turnovers, etc), provide your assessment of training needed to emphasize applications beyond the scope of the hot particle control program.
F.
Provide the schedule for completion of the evaluation of the potential overexposure.
i 1
l l
l
,