ML20149M127

Submits Article from Energy Daily Re Concerns Over Activities at Maine Yankee

ML20149M127
Person / Time
Site:	Maine Yankee
Issue date:	11/21/1996
From:	Blanch P AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC
Shared Package
ML20149M049	List: ML20149M047 ML20149M059 ML20149M063 ML20149M084 ML20149M104 ML20149M105 ML20149M118 ML20149M123 ML20149M125 ML20149M127 ML20149M129 ML20149M130 ML20149M132 ML20149M138 ML20149M145 ML20149M150 ML20149M152 ML20149M154 ML20149M157 ML20149M160 ML20149M172 ML20149M175 ML20149M176 ML20149M184 ML20149M192 ML20149M196 ML20149M200 ML20149M208 ML20149M235 ML20149M238 ML20149M243 ML20149M246 ML20149M252 ML20149M255 ML20149M262
References
NUDOCS 9612120306
Download: ML20149M127 (3)

Text

- - .. - - - .. . . -- - - _-.

From: PAUL M. 8LANCH <PMBLANCH91x.netcom.com>

To: WND2.WNP3(jaz,awd),WNDl.WNP2(hjm),TWDI.TWP4(gam,wj...

l Date: 11/21/96 8:02am l

Subject:

MAINE UCS

-A0 i UCS, NRC At Odds Over Maine Yankee, Again Source: THE ENERGY DAILY l i'

THE ENERGY DAILY via Individual Inc. : The Union of Concerned -

Scientists is urging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to shut down the troubled Maine =

l Yankee nuclear plant immediately, and not allow the reactor to resume operation until a - number of critical scfety problems are resolved at the Bath, Maine, reactor.

UCS' drive to shut down the plant is being spearheaded by the - group's new nuclear expert, David Lochbaum, who released an assessment Tuesday of a recent - major NRC investigation at Maine Yankee. And while Lochbaum and NRC largely agree on what = the reactor's technical problems are, they clearly differ on the safety - implications of those problems.

In its inspection report, which was released last month, the NRC - team concluded that while

. the reactor cannot be safely operated at full power, 910 megawatts, - I l

adequate safety margins I exist to operate the plar.t at the current level of 825 MW. Maine -

Yankee had been operating

, at 910 MW for nearly 18 years; however, commission staff in January =

[

ordered Maine Yankee to reduce its output to 825 MW after allegations of degraded safety - at the l reactor first i

surfaced.

Lochbaum disagrees with NRC's conclusions. He maintains that the - reactor is unsafe to operate--at either power level--and is an accident waiting to = happen.

I NRC must take immediate action to correct these problems if the = people )

in Maine are to be l protected from safety risks,' Lochbaun, a veteran nuclear - engineer, said '

, in releasing his i findings.

Lochbau.n's concerns center around the ability of certain emergency - safety systems--including the reactor's emergency diesel generator and - component cooling water i systems--to respond as they are designed to at current opsrating - levels. i Lochbaum maintains 9612120306 961210 PDR ORG NRRA PDR l

l l

that-these systems each challenge safe operation of Maine Yankee, = even at its presently authorized power level.' ,

i He points out that the NRC team identified several weaknesses and = non-conservative l judgments in Maine Yankee's calculation for emergency diesel = generator l

• loading. ' A ,

loading calculation confirms that the generating capacity of the = emergency '

generator

! exceeds the total power eequirements of the electrical equipment it =

supplies. In Maine Yankee's case, NRC found that there is a relatively small margin--a =

! difference of just .28 i percent-- between these two figures. 1 In addition, the team noted that Maine Yankee's loading calculation = does not take into

, account ambient air temperatures above 90 degrees Fahrenheit = following a l design basis

' accident. According to Lochbaum, when that temperature is exceeded, =

cooling limitations are placed on the emergency generator, which in turn would require a - derating in its electric output.

And, he continued, [s]ince the... loading calculation provides = merely .28 percent margin for )

l derating the [ generator's] electrical output, it is not apparent = that the  ;

l [ generator] can supply l all the required loads under design bases conditions even at the = present authorized power l

l evel . "  !

A similar problem exists for the plant's component cooling water = systems, he said. These systems remove decay heat and heat generated by emergency equipment =

following a reactor accident. According to Lochbaum, NRC's calculations for these = systems showed essentially no margin at the prasently authorized power level." The NRC team - also emphas~ized that the system could not be relied on to operate at full power.

Finally, Lochbaum said, regardless of whether the plant can be = safely operated at 825 MW, NRC should fine Maine Yankee significantly for operating the plant - for i nearly 18 years at

power levels it was not equipped to handle in accident conditions.

I uTHE ENERGY DAILY -- 11-21-96>>

[11-20-96 at 18:01 EST, Copyright 1996, King Publishing Group]

t l

l l

l Paul M. Blanch Energy Consultant 135 Hyde Rd. ,

West Hartford CT 06117 l . Voice 860-236-0326 t

Fax 860-232-9350 l I

I l l l

i l

i l

l l

l l

l l

l l

1 i

i l i l '

-n,