ML20149M105
| ML20149M105 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/14/1996 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149M049 | List:
|
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9612120222 | |
| Download: ML20149M105 (2) | |
Text
_ -
From:
<JAZWOL9aol.com>
To:
WND2.WNP3(jaz)
Date:
11/14/96 10:52pm
Subject:
Fwd: I wasn't Sleeping!
4 Forwarded message:
From: PMBLANCH@lX.NETCOM.COM (PAUL M. BLANCH) 1 To:
JAZ@NRC.G0V (JZ) i Date: 96-11-14 12:24:40 EST John:
No need to take this as a formal allegation unless you want to. No, I am not the author of this masterpiece.
The Comm Edison position on nuclear energy (i.e. a seated, nodding position) raises several issues which the NRC and interested parties should be aware of.
- 1. What are the NRC regulations on sleep? How is " asleep" actually defined?
- 2. Does the final Safety Analysis specify a distinction between being simply
" asleep" and being " asleep at a switch"? Is being " stretched out at a switch" differentiated from being "in a seated, nodding position at a switch"?
- 3. Are there established procedures for sleeping or are operators permitted to develop discrc'ionary procedures in accordance with current situations?
- 4. Were these operators adequately trained in the sleep task?
- 5. To prevent interruption of the sleep activities, is it the NRC's or the utility's role to minimize the effects whistleblowing by maintaining all whistleblowers at a predetermined distance from those engaged in sleep?
- 6. Is there an NRC regulation on noctural emissions? Is unconscious thumb-sucking permited during the sleep task?
- 7. Are there emergency pillow stations, adequately stocked, inspected and indicated by illuminated signs, every twenty feet?
- 8. Are operators required to wear emergency sleep suits with non-slip i
footsies and emergency rear evacuation hatches only while engaged in the sleep i
task or are said suits worn at all times?
- 9. Is " stretching out" a procedural requirement? If so, how much of a stretch is required to be considered acceptable sleep? Is a fetal position acceptable?-
- 10. If :;1eeping is a procedural requirement, were the operators at Comm Ed imprudent by remaining seated in a nodding position?
10.1. If sleeping is not a procedural requirement, shouldn't Comm Ed apply for a license amendment if they intend to continue require operators to carry out the slcop task while in a seated, nodding position at their desks?
9612120222 961210 PDR ORG NRRA PDR u
_ ~ _. -
- 11. Would the NRC be justified in granting any such amendment because l
sleeping in a nodding position has worked successfully in the past?
Recommendation: Comm Ed should propose the same back-up technology that NU proposed for spent fuel pool break-downs, viz., running in a firehose from the nearest ocean and spraying water on the problem.
l That's what I'd do.
Paul M. Blanch
' Energy ranruitsnt 135 Hyd' "J.
West Hartford CT 06117 Voice 860-235-0326 Fax 8::-2:2-0350 l
l l
i i
!