ML20149L246

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Comments on non-common Performance Indicators for Sdmp & Fuel Cycle Programs
ML20149L246
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/22/1997
From: Bellamy R
NRC
To: Scott Moore
NRC
Shared Package
ML20149J917 List:
References
NUDOCS 9707310223
Download: ML20149L246 (2)


Text

.. 1 From: Ronald Bellamy To: TWD2.TWP8.SWM-Dates. 4/22/97 5:05pm

Subject:

' Comments on IMPEP Indicators

-Region I has reviewed the IMPEP non-common performance indicators for the SDMP and Fuel Cycle programs, and believe that they provide sufficient structure and guidance for both regional preparation for an IMPEP visit and for the IMPEP team to implement. Specific comments are attached. Please contact me if there are any questions.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Ron Bellamy 7

CC:. TWD2.TWP8.DAC, ARB, atdl.ATPl.BSM1, CHD1.CHP2.RJC1...

L t

I t

P h

i l

i I.  ;

1 9707310223 970724 PDR RC t

SSD PDR ~

\ - ..

--, . - - . . . . - , - . .~ -. - - . . . . . -

~

I l

1 REGION I COMMENTS ON IMPEP NON-COMMON INDICATORS FOR SDMP AND FUEL FACILITY ACTIVITIES t

l 1. On page 7, first full paragraph. Eliminate the word " generally" in the first sentence.

Supervisors should accompany each inspector at least once annually to assess

performance, provideieedback and maintain the necessary management quality assurance.

! 2. On page 7, the fourth full paragraph. When inspections are conducted by teams, there

can only be one leader. To say that at least one certified NRC inspector should be
- - designated as team leader implies you can have more than one leader. Recommend reword 2-to say that there should be a designated team leader, and this individual must be a qualified NRC inspector (not certified).

l

3. On page 11, first full paragraph. . Pending escalated enforcement is generally not a good I i

reason to delay communicating inspection findings to a licensee. If findings are of such significance that they may lead to escalated enforcement, licensee should be made aware i of them in a timely manner. The results of the enforcement action rnay wait, but the

[ technical findings should not be delayed.

1

4. On page 17, last paragraph. Eliminate the word "nearly" in the first sentence for the
same reason as explained in Comment Number One above.

4 k