ML20149J703
| ML20149J703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1987 |
| From: | Henson J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149J333 | List: |
| References | |
| SQA201, NUDOCS 8802230179 | |
| Download: ML20149J703 (12) | |
Text
_ __.
t
~
TE.NNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY.
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT STANDARD PRACTICE SOA201 UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTION
, DETERMINATION Revision 0 PREPARED BY:
J. R. Henson RESPONSIBLE SECTION:
Environmental REVISED BY:
N/A SL' EMITTED BY:
88 Responsible Sec: ton Supervisor SITE QA CONCURRENCE:
.3 s[.
APPROVED BY:
Plant Manager or Site Director ff%/ l D DATE APPROVED:
Reason for revision (in:lude all Ins:ruction Change Form Nos.):
New Standard Practice to Drovide basis for unreviewed environmental cuestion determination eer CAOR 50P870988 and LER 87029.
Tht last ca9e of this instru: tion is nu-ber:
a 8802230179 000217 PDR ADOCK 050 327 R
S.EQUOYAH NU.CLEA.R PLANT
~
~
PLANT INSTRUCTION REVISION LOG STANDARD PRACTICE SQA201 REVISION Date Pages REASON FOR REVISION (INCLUDE COMMITMENTS LEVEL Aporoved Affected AND ALL ICF FORM NUMBERS)
New Standarc Practice to provice a casis for unreviewed environmental question determination 0
All per CAOR 50?870988 and LER 87029.
e.
1 s
l l
l l
l C367C/ car i
~-
TO:
Controlled Manual Holder FRON:
Document Control / Records Management, SQN DATE:
SUBJECT:
TRANSHITTAL OF SEQUOYAH INSTRUCTIONS Please sign below and return to acknowledge receipt of the following -
material and affirm that it has been placed in the appropriate manuals', your table of contents has been updated, and the superseded instruction removed and discarded.
Return this transmittal to Document Control within 10 days.
STANDARD PRACTICE 50A201 UNREVIEWED ENVIRDNMENTAL 00ESTION DETERMINATION Remove and destroy Insert Pace Date Revision Pace Da:e Revision All 0
New Standard Practice Return to:
Document Control / Records Management, SQN Signa:ure/Date 035'IC/dar
SQN SQA201 Page 1 Revision 0 l.0 PURPOSE To provide a basis for review of changes, tests *, or experime$ts described in Tech Spec Appendix B to determine if an Unreviewed Environmental Question (UEQ) exists.*'
2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies only to workplans, TACF's and tests covered by AI-9, AI-19 part IV, and STI All other types of plant procedures have been reviewed and will not cause an UEQ to exist.
3.0 SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND REFERENCES,
3.1 Source Documents 3.1.1 Sequoyah Technical Specifications Appendix B, Section 5.3.C.
3.1.2 National Environmental Policy Act 3.1.3 TVA Instruction IX Environmental Review 3.1.4 Secuoyah licenses DPR77, item 2F and DPR79, item 2G.
3.2 References 3.2.1 AI-9 3.2.2 AI-19, part TV 3.2.3 STI-l 4.0 INSTRUCTIONS 4.1 All workolans, temporary alterations, and special tests that involve the cumping or potential spilling of wastes (petroleum products, chemicals, coolants, etc.), removal of asbestos insulation, earthwork (digging, grading, hauling, disposing of, etc.), new buildings (reworking land), and demolition must be reviewed by the Environmental Section.
If the modification, temporary alteration or special test connects to a potabl.e or raw water system, sanitary sewer, or crain, it would require a review to evalua:e its impact.
0551Q/pr i
c
. SON 5Q4201 Page 2 Revision 0 4.0 INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 4.2 If this review confirms that the work will not result in any new or increased discharges to the air, land or water environment that have not been previously evaluated or covered by environmental permits or the final environmental statement, it shall be determined to be covered by the NEPA STANDARD'S Categorical Exclusions.
If the work does not fall within the categorical exclusions, an evaluation of significance must be made to determine if an UEQ exists.
4.3 The e' valuation results shall be documented by completing
~ and submitting to the Performance Monitoring Unit,,
and attaching to AI-9, AI-19 part IV,' or STI-1 documents as appropriate.
l l
l 05710/ car
l
. 50N 50001 Page 3 Revision 0 ATTACHMENT 1 t
Page 1 of 1 UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL OVESTION DETERMINATI,0N Parent Document (Workplan, TACF #, Test #, Etc.):
P Inis change, test, or expe'iment is within the scope of the NEPA STANDARD'S r
Categorical Exclusions.
. - ~.
~
YES NO
, But the evaluation of significance is as follows:
i t
The change, test, or experiment can or cannot proceed without i
prior NRC/ State of Tennessee Water Quality Control approval.
r Environmental Se:t' ion Recresentative:
/
f
\\
cc:
Forwarced to Perforr.ance M nitoring Unit.
i i
t 0571Q/ car 4
1 i
l
50N SQA201 Page 4 Aevision 0 APPENDIX A Page 1 of I COMMITMENT LIST FOR SQA201 Comitment i
Comitment ID Summary of Comitment Correspondence C1 LER 87-029 Revise plant instructions to 553870716 926 require a documented evaivation of changes, tests, and experiments to the ' facility which could effect the er,vironment as required by TS 5.3.C (Appendix B).
}
'y l
t i
1 j
r 1
l l
f 1
05710/dar
- O e
e ATTACIIMEhT 3
's w
AUB 281985 Mr. Philip L. Stewart, Manager Chattanooga Field Office Division of Water Pollution Control 2501 Milne Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37406
Dear Mr. Stewart:
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - FISHKILL IN SQN DIFFUSER POND - JULY 12 Approximately 1500 dead _ fish were observed in the northwest corner of the diffuser pond on July 12.
The tish ranged from 1 to 20 inches in length.
A species estimate was made and it was determined that approximately 50 percent of the fish killed were carp, 35 percent were catfish, 10 percent were sunfish, 3 percent were drum, and 2 percent were shad.
Samples of water flowing into the diffuser pond from discharge serial No. (DSN) 103 were collected on the date of the kill.
Samples were also collected in the diffuser pond along the bank, 100 feet east of the DSN 103 discharge point.
Results of the analyses were:
DSN 103 Discharto Diffuser Pond Temperature. 'F 86.0 104.0 pH 6.9 7.0 Dissolved oxygen, m;/L 4.2 3.6 Chlorine 0.15 0.10 The chlorine was analyzed by a field Hach kit and results are questionable.
There was no known source of chlorino discharge to DSN 103.
Hundreds of small (ap to six inches long) fish were congreasted in the diffuser pond where the cooler DSN 103 discharge was entering.
This should rule out any suspicion of chlorine as the cause.
They appeared to be trying to 6et into this area of cooler water.
4 If you have any questions, please call Michael Hines or Stephen R. Wells at (205) 386-2971 or FTS $72-3971 in Muscle Shoals. Alabama.
Sincerely, Martin E. Rivers. Director Environmental Quality SRW:BC L62 850829 cc:
See page 2
2-Mr. Philip L. Stewart AUG 281985 cc:
Tennessee Department of Health and Environment Division of Water Pollution Control TERRA Building 150 Ninth Avenue, North Nashville, Tennesser 37219 Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Attention:
Mr. Danny Scott Post Office Box 40747 Nashville, Tennessee 37204 H.
f,.
Abercrombie, SQN
(
T. B. Allen. 1620 CST 2-C
\\
- 8. W. Brown, 140 EE-K J. R. Henson, SQN C. L. Massey, 100 IBM-C H. S. Sanger, Jr., E11833 C-K J. W. Shipp, Jr., 6411 EBR-C Prepared by Stephen R. Wells 0238K i
=,
l ENCLOSURE 2 LIST OF COMMITMENTS 1.
AI-18 will be revised by July 31, 1988, to identify the responsibilities for preparation review, and transmittal of the Annual Environmental OperatinE Report.
.