ML20149J224
| ML20149J224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100102 |
| Issue date: | 07/21/1997 |
| From: | Dicharry R SOURCE PRODUCTION & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. |
| To: | Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149J226 | List: |
| References | |
| CAL-97-7-06, CAL-97-7-6, NUDOCS 9707280122 | |
| Download: ML20149J224 (24) | |
Text
-
l 91-O l 02-Y
@0 a
l July 21,1997 Carl J. Paperiello, Director Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Reference:
Confirmatory Action Letter No. 97-7-006, ' dated June 24,1997.
SPEC QA Procedure 97-01, Revision (0), dated July 14,1997.
NRC Letter from Carl J. Paperiello dated July 15,1997.
Docket Number 71-0102.
Dear Mr. Paperiello:
This is in response to my telephone conference with Mr. Tom Matula today in which additional information was requested to support my report dated July 18,1997 to verify completion of Phase 1 of SPEC QA Procedure 97-01, Revision (0), dated July 14,1997, titled " Phase I of Corrective Action Implementation Plan." The enclosed support information consists of the following documents.
I 1.
Daily Meeting Minutes of the Corrective Action Implementation Plan Oversight Team for 7/14/97, 7/15/97,7/16/97,7/17/97 and 7/18/97.
2.
QA Program retraining records including topics, examinations, lists of attendees and examination results
]
for retraining provided on July 16 and 17,1997.
3.
Revised Matrix of Assignments and Corrective Actions, Rev (5), dated July 21,1997. The revision corrects three typographical errors in Rev (4), dated July 18,1997. The corrections are locamd in the y
J
" Reference" column and are indicated by boldface and redlined (darkened) font.
//
4.
A.
SPEC Internal Audit Report, Revision (1), dated July 21,1997.
O2 B.
NRC Observations from June 16-19,1997 Inspection and SPEC Corrective Actions, i
Report Revision (1), July 21,1997 C.
NRC Observations from July 9-10,1997 Inspection and SPEC Corrective Actions, j
Report Revision (1), July 21,1997, 9707200122 970721
- ^
{DR ADOCK 07100102 PDR co0003 lllE!Eill!I!!!I}E}El.II t
Nource Production & Equipment Co., Inc.
113 Teal Street St. Rose, LA 70087-9691 Phone 504/464-9471 Telex 460156 FAX 504/467-7685
Ob e
@0 Mr. Carl Paperiello July 21,1997 The above reports were revised only to facilitate the NRC's review of the CA's completed in Phase I, which are referenced in the revired Matrix of Assignments and Corrective Actions, Rev (5), dated July 21,1997 (Item 3 above). Cross references to all Phase I CA's, which are listed in the Matrix, have been added to the reports. The information and corrective actions described in the reports have not been changed at all. The additional cross references are in I oldface and redlined.(darkened) font.
Please note that in some cases there are findings and observations in the three reports that all have the same corrective action. In such instances the CA completion record (the Matrix) references only one finding from one of the reports. We believe that it is not necessary to repeatly report thm a specific CA was completed.
Note also that numerous other CA's, approximately 12, have been completed that are not included in this report. This report is intended to describe only the CA's that are referenced in the Corrective Action Implementation Plan, Rev (0), dated July 14,1997, which was agreed upon by the NRC as reflected in the NRC letter dated July 15,1997. The additional completed CA's will be included in the Phase II Corrective Action Report. We did not include those CA's in this report for fear that it would delay the review of the Phase I report.
If there is any additional information you need please let me know and I will get it to your staff immediately.
Sinc-y[
L R. D. (Donny) Dicha y President Enclosed:
1.
Daily Meeting Minutes of the Corrective Action Implementation Plan Oversight Team.
2.
QA Program retraining records.
3.
Matrix of Assignments and Corrective Actions, Rev (5), dated July 21,1997.
4.
SPEC Internal Audit Report, Revision (1), dated July 21,1997.
5.
NRC Observations from June 16-19,1997 Inspection and SPEC Corrective Actions, Report Revision (1), July 21,1997.
6.
NRC Observations from July 9-10,1997 Inspection and SPEC Corrective Actions, Report Revision (1), July 21,1997.
07 22-97 GC1 l
l CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERSIGHT TEAM DAILY MEETING MINUTES 07/15/97 - 1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m.
Attendecs:
Donny Dicharry George Moran Pete Weber l
Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Tiffany Templet Absent:
Kenny Carrington Distribution:
Donny Dicharry George Moran Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Kenny Carrington Tiffany Templet 1.
OPENING COMMENTS There is a list ofPhase I Corrective Actions. Everyone has been assigned corrective actions.
Phase I is solving and fixing the QA problem to the point where we could resume limited production of five units per week.
Part of the Phase I requirement is to conduct daily meetings. One of the assignments is to established an implementation plan oversight team. Donny is Team Leader and Pete is Project Manager / Secretary for Phase L The intent for these meetings is to give assignments, review progress on assignments, listen to what each other is doing,~make sure we are not duplicating efforts /not leaving holes in various assignments and reporting completion.
2.
REVIEW OF CURRENT ASSIGNMENTS a)
Part ofJoe's assigmnent was to complete the in-progress revisions to the Engineering Change Request (ECR) and Engineering Change Notice (ECN) procedures implemented. Joe commented that the ECR and ECN procedures look overall basically in place. The problem will be linking them into the QA Manuel.
The other issue is that there is another document in the Procedures Manuel that already exists. The document is 1.10 that specifies drawing control. That document j
conflicts with Chapters 5 & 6 in the QA Manuel. This document either needs to be i
revised, removed or deleted. Joe stated that he should be finished by Wednesday, July 16,1997. Donny will meet with Joe after this meeting to decided if we can delete the other document.
I b)
Pete is currently working on creating an area non conforming material to be separated in a QA controlled, locked area. Pete purchased a lock for the door and has already been installed. QA has already marked that location as "QA CONTROLLED - DO NOT ENTER - QA PERSONNEL ONLY". QA and Tiffany have the only two keys.
The material will be moved in on Wednesday, July 16,1997.
The second part to this is all in-process work will be reviewed and tagged properly.
Pete will work with Mike and QA employees on that subject. One of the other items C%s PEC\\D EPTs\\QA\\N RC-ins P.9 N MP-TEAM \\970715.WPD l
l
is to review our Calibration Procedure. Pete has already begun looking at the i
Procedures for Calibrations. 'Ihis should be completed by the end of the day.
c)
George is to develop and conduct a retraining schedule and outline. Develop retraining syllabus, handouts and exam questions for QA Program and QA l
Procedures. This exam will be conducted for all personnel on Wednesday, July 16, 1997 from 8:00 a.m. to 10iOO a.m. at the James Building. There will be a written
-l examination and personnel will be required to pass the written examination before j
moving onto Module B. The date has not been set for Module B.
d)
' Mike is to develop retraining syllabus, handouts and exam questions for QA 1
Travelers; QA checklists, inspection reports, parts identification; QA Drawings and use and control of drawings - Module B. Mike commented that he has the exams segregated by different people for taking different exams.
Mike has all calipers recalled, re calibrated and redistributed. He gave training to j
Tommie and Michael on calibration.
e)
Ken is to review all existing travelers by production and engineering to verify they
}
j construct the current revision level for that item.
Production department-l representative will review and revise each traveler as needed to ensure each traveler is relevant and up to date. Travelers will be checked by Engineering and QA.
The main travelers are done. As a traveler is finished, it will be brought to Joe. Then Joe will verify that it reflects the drawings. The 150 travelers are being worked on J
first. Donny commented that the travelers will be revised before we start using the 3
travelers to fabricate cameras.
f)
Tiffany to inspect all controlled drawing books to verify that the current drawing is present.
Next meeting: Wednesday, July 16,1997 at 1:00 p.m. "
Minutes Prepared By:
Twr TiffifE L e/n let I /NI Minutes Approved By:
/
Date:
4 j
a l
i y
C:\\A-SPEC \\DEPTs\\QA\\NRC-INsP.9NMP-TEAM \\970715.WPD
CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERSIGHT TEAM DAILY MEETING MINUTES 07/16/97 - 1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m.
Attendees:
Donny Dicharry Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Tiffany Templet Absent:
Kenny Carrington George Moran Distribution:
Donny Dicharry George Moran Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Kenny Carrington Tiffany Templet 1.
OPENING COMMENTS a)
Pete commented that Tommie is completing the task of putting all non conforming material in the QA area.
Pete has assigned Tonunie and Mike T. 32A which involves inspecting existing parts with engraving against the drawing for parts prior to engraving.. Production will assist them with any help they may need. This will be completed today.
Paul has been assigned the task of searching all files to locate the certificates of compliance for the DE shields. The deadline will be 7/17/97. ~ We will start a file for 4
all certificates of compliance and make copies of each applicable certificate of compliance and file it with each package's master file.
4 Ken will revise traveler 150008 to include a step specifying what is to be done with the certificate ofcompliance.
QA is working on 24A caliper calibration procedure to revise as needed. All calipers will be removed from service until proven that they are in proper calibration and marked accordingly. Fixtures and jigs will be re calibrated. QA personnel will be retrained. Tiffany to help with markups to procedure.
b)
Mike will set up the training class on 7/17 from 8:00 - 10:00 on QA travelers, QA checklists, inspection reports, parts identification, QA drawings use and control of drawings. He sent out a list of all employees to attend.
c)
Joe compared our QA Manuel 5.0 to what is requested in the Code of Federal Regulations and it does not address what they are asking for. He made a draft of our QA Manuel 5.0 to match the Code of Federal Regulations.
Joe is currently working on Item 23A. Joe commented that by completing the in-progress revisions to the Engineering Change Request and Engineering Change Notice procedures will not eliminate the preliminary status that is called out in the drawing control procedure which is 1.10. Donny will send a letter to the NRC in regards to the Engineering Change Request and Engineering Change Notice CM-SPEC \\DEFrsiQA\\NRC-INSP.97\\lMP. TEAM \\970716.WPD
M F
procedures. The corrective action will be to revise procedure 1.10 to require the y
i.
Engineering Change Request to change the preliminary drawings.
Douny to handle swap out.
- i Joe is still working on 15 Revise drawing control procedure to make each traveler part of the assembly instructions for a specific drawing and 17A Revise the drawing i
control procedure to make each traveler part of tSe assembly instructions for a t
specific drawing.
' d)
Donny has completed 35A All implementation Team members will' audit individual 1
QA functions on a random basis throughout the normal course of business. The audit observations will be recorded. A procedure will be established and pocket audit record pads used for " walk-through" spot audits. This is in the process of approval.
}
He has given to Mike F. to attach a cover sheet.
.F
,Donny has completed 02B Appoint Dr. Parker to serve as member of Materials i
Review Board (MRB). Also, Item 12A is complete - Coordinate with Dr. Parker to prepare for oversight of fabrication related QA activities during Phase II.
I F
i e)
Ken commented that handwritten changes ~are completed for.19A Production department representatives will review and revise each traveler as needed to ensure
. each traveler is relevant and up to date. Travelers will be checked by Engineering udQA.
l l
Ken will-start working with Joe Thursday moming on Item 16A to Review all existing travelers by production and engineering to verify they construct the current revision level for that item.
4 Next meeting: Thursday, July 17,1997 at 1:00 p.m.
j Minutes Prepared By:
Oh h
Tiffany' Tefd let
{
)
Minutes Approved By:
Date: I/8 ?
a
/
,a i
e,
- C:\\A-SPEC \\DEPTs\\QA\\NRC-INsP.97\\lMP-TEAM \\970716 WPD
CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN l
OVERSIGIIT TEAM DAILY MEETING MINUTES 1
l 07/17/97 1:00 p.m. - 1:20 p.m.
Attendees:
Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer George Moran Absent:
Kenny Carrington Donny Dicharry Tiffany Templet Distribution:
Donny Dicharry George Moran Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Kenny Carrington Tiffany Templet 1.
OPENING COMMENTS a)
George commented that all training and exams are complete. There are three make up for Phase A exams that will be taken care of by the end of the week.
b)
Joe commented that 15A and 17A are still be worked on. There are just a few revisions that need to be done.
c)
Ken commented that 16A and 19A need to be reviewed by Joe d) 20A part of the travelers review is complete. Joe will complete sketches by tomorrow.
e) 21 A Pete and Mike will meeting regarding this item.
f) 22A has been completed.
g) 23A Joe is still working on this item.
h) 24A Mike is almost finished with this item. He is waiting for correct dates from
)
Paul. QA personnel has been retrained. Fixtures and jigs have been re calibrated.
i) 25A Pete has reviewed the procedure and this item will be complete by the end of the day.
j) 26A'has been assigned to Paul to collect and destroy all existing redline change drawings 150008-2. This item will be completed today.
k) 27A has been assigned to Paul and Ken.
1) 28A and 29A have been assigned to Mike and Tiffany. This is currently being worked on.
m) 30A has been completed.
n) 31 A Pete has written the procedure and the final copy will be released today.
o) 32A was assigned to Mike Thompson.
p) 33A has not been completed.
q) 34A has been completed.
r) 35A has been completed.
s) 36A will be completed today.
Next meeting: Friday, July 18,1997 at 1:00 p.m.
l Minutes Prepared By:
O)Am/\\ OB w L
Tiffi' {L. Tefdplet 7
l Minutes Approved By:
4 0 Ine A Date: 'fItIt")
l T
~(
CAA-SPEC \\DEFrs\\Q A\\N RC-INSP.9NM P. TEAM \\970717.WPD
CORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERSIGHT TEAM DAILY MEETING MINUTES j
07/18/97 - 1:00 p.m.- 1:30 p.m.
Attendees:
Pete Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer George Moran Denny Dicharry Absent:
Kenny Carrington Tiffany Templet Distribution:
Donny Dicharry George Moran Petq Weber Mike Frizell Ken Joslyn Joe Fryer Kenny Carrington Tiffany Templet 1.
OPENING COMMENTS a)
Pete commented that everything is complete with the exception of travelers, sketches and document control procedures.
b)
Joe commented that Document Control 1.01 and Document Change Request 1.08 need to be typed into the computer today. These documents need to be revised and Renee and Kelly will type those i
into the computer.
c)
Pete commented that Tiffany will help type travelers into the computer. Ken commented that all travelers will be typed up by the end of the day. George will send Kelly over to help Tiffany type travelers. Ken and Pete will review the travelers.
d)
The 5.0 and 6.0 have been revised and needs to get signatures. The Document Change Request forms need to be filled out.
e)
Mike will handle the Document Distribution procedure. This will be finished today.
2.
COMPLETION DATES OF ITEMS a)
Item ISA Date completed 07/18/97 4
b)
Item 17A Date completed 07/18/97 c)
Item 18A Date completed 07/18/97 d)
Item 19A Date completed 07/18/97 c)
Item 20A Date completed 07/18/97 f)
Item 21 A Date completed 07/18/97 g)
Item 22A Date completed 07/18/97 h)
Item 23A Date completed 07/18/97 i)
Item 24A Date completed O7/15/97 j)
Item 25A Date completed 07/18/97 k)
Item 26A Date completed 07/17/97 I)
Item 28A Date completed 07/18/97 m)
Item 29A Date completed 07/18/97 n)
Item 30A Date completed 07/18/97 o)
Item 31 A Date completed 07/18/97 p)
Item 32A Date completed 07/l8/97 q)
Item 33A Date completed 07/18/97 r)
Item 34A Date completed 07/17/97 s)
Item 35A Date completed 07/18/97 t)
Item 36A Date completed 07/17/97 Next meeting:
Monday, July 21,1997 at 1:00 p.m.
Minutes Prepared By:
SM, i bAI 1 f%n
.j plet
[
Minutes Approved By:
/
M1 Date:
/
/
C:\\A-S PEC\\DEITSTQA\\NRC-INS P.97\\IM P-TEAM \\9707 I 8.WPD
l MINUTES Corrective Action Implementation Plan Meeting - Phase I July 14,1997 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM Attendance:
Donny Dicharry, George Moran, Pete B eber.
Reference:
QA Procedure No: 97-01, Revision (0) i 1.
Assign QA Program Corrective Action Implementation Plan Team Members.
Donny in accordance with QA Procedure 97 01, the following individuals were appointed by Donny Dicharry, President & Implementation Plan Team Leader:
George Moran, Vice President; Pete Weher, General Manager, Mike Frizell. QA Manager; Ken Joslyn. Production Manager, Joe Frier, Engineering Manager, and Kenny Carrington, Special Projects Manager.
2.
Assign Pete as Project Manager for Phase I implementation Plan.
Donny Pete was arpointed the Project Manager for Phase I.
3.
Discuss Potential Project Manager of Phase 11 and III Implementation.
Donny' This topic was tabled pending completion of Phase I.
j 4.
Discuss QA Organizational Changes.
Donny Pete is in the process ofidentifying options. He will fonnally reiterate to Mike the need to replace him as QA Mgr and will attempt to recruit Mike to remain to assist in the Plan.
5.
Make Agenda for 1st Team meeting. Specify task assignments.
Pete
'Ihe agenda should include the Phase.1 schedule, list of specific assignments, and the meeting schedule.
Donny to prepare matrix of Phase I,11 and !!! CA's.
6.
Assign generation of Meeting Minutes per QA Procedure 97-01.
Pete Donny assigned Pete as the Implementation Plan Projed Ncretary (for the entire Plan).
As such. Pete will be responsible for the preparation of acendas, minutes and the meeting schedule.
7.
New Business All A.
The dran QA Training Plan. Rev (0) was revieu ed. Target 3 ea 2 hr blocks ofinstre;!cn starting Wed 7/16 and each day thereafter until completed. Confirmed that an individual must pass Mod sie A before being allowed to complete Module B.
B.
Pete will assign some critical path CA's from Pha<e I immediately.
8.
Schedule ist Team Meeting.
Pete Tuesday, July 15.1997 at 1:00 PM. The Phase I meeting will be held daily at 1:00 PM unless rescheduled.
9.
Adjourn 84h./
Date: 7 l
Minutes Prepared Dp
/
//
~
Date:
97 Minutes Approved By Peie Weber.I'hase i Project Manager g
MINUTES.01 1
QA CA frnplementation I'lan Meeting Minutes No. I Phase i PageIeli July 141997 l
Memo To:
File From:
George Moran
Subject:
Module A - QA Training - NRC Regulation & SPEC QA Manual / Requirements Date:
July 16,1997 The following persons demonstrated proficiency in their knowledge of NRC Regulations and the SPEC QA Program and Manual, as evidenced by their successful completion of written examinations administered at the conclusion of the QA Training on these subjects. This training was facilitated by Donny Dicharry and myselfon this date from 8 AM to approximately 10:15
~
AM at the James Drive facility. Training materials and examinations are on file in the QA Dept.
Ken Joslyn Kelly Laiche MitcM! Guillory Kenny Carnagton Paul Guess Danny Guillot Pete Weber Henry Moore Tim Perrin Joe Fryer Newton Robert Kip Nichol Kevin Schehr Tommie Ruiz Dane Picone Mike Frizell Michael Williams Mike Thompson Steve Punch Mark Albarado Shane Trahan Tony Bustillo Steve Byrd Robert Lawrason Karen Robicheaux Donny Faucheux Signed:
Gh r,
QA Mana l
C: Personnel File
QA TRAINING
/
SIGN IN SHEET JULY 16,1997 Ken Joslyn
\\
A Kenny Carrington J(
Pete Weber
[
Joe Fryer M
t v
Kevin Schehr bL-I u-N Mike Frizell 8
V 7] M K/
Steve Punch M
uo D
Tony Bustillo 0
j Karen Robicheaux d 'bCh (tug I I/##/97]
Gwen Montalbano Kelly Laiche
//tr o[#
Renee Agurcia
[7!# 7 Tiffany Templet Paul Guess W
Henry Moore W NM M Newton Robert Tommie Ruiz S7
~
o Michael Williams II[h Jason Aucoin W
l Mark Albarado f/A1/y/g/M
Y.
l f
Ste." ", 1 M-r i
D. any Faucheux Sghe Mitchell Guillory
- M/d//my_
Y) i i
/
Danny Guillot hw4 / m2V/7 Tim Perdn M.
d.h.Fll l) l Kip Nichol uM
/
/
Dane Picone k
Mike Thompson
'777Mv
/ 07n.44ca, Shane Trahan
.f <v 2. Mem
$66EgrhWr-ASW ' h "' e L
l I
l
EXAMINATION ANSWER KEY AND REPORT for QA Corrective Action Implementation Plan PhaseI Stand-Down Retraining NRC Regulations - Proctor: Donny Dicharry July 16,1997 1.
Which Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) require reporting of defects and noncompliance?
[X] 10 CFR Part 21
[ ] 10 CFR Part 34
[ ] 10 CFR Part 71 25 of 25 correct.
2.
The 10 CFR Part 21 reporting of defects and noncompliance regulation requires a responsible officer who obtains informadon reasonably indicating that a basic component contains defects, which could create a substantial safety hazard, to immediately:
[ ] Stop Work
[ ] Notify Louisiana
_ [X] Notify the Commission (NRC).
12 of 25 correct.
13 of 25 chose "Stop Work." Exam error. The question included the word "immediately" which is not included in the rule.
3.
A Basic component is a component, or part that affects their safety function, in which a defect could create:
[ ] Any safety hazard
[X] A substantial safety hazard
[ ] Any safety concem 23 of 25 correct.
4.
A Deviation means a departure from the technical requirements included in:
[X] A procurement document
[ ] A drawing
[ ] A sketch.
25 of 25 correct.
5.
A Defect means a deviation in a basic component determined on the basis of:
[X] An evaluation
[ ] An audit report
[ ] A non-conforming material report 25 of 25 correct.
6.
An Evaluation means the process of determining whether a particular deviation:
[X] Could create a substantial hazard
[ ] Violates the QA Program
[ ] Caused :m overexposure 25 of 25 correct.
7.
A Substantial sar~ety hazard means a loss of safety function to the extent that there is a major reduction in the degree of protection provided to:
[ ] QA personnel
[ ] NRC officials
[X] Public health and safety 25 of 25 correct.
t 8.
10 CFR 21 Sec. 21.21 Notification of failure to comply or existence of a defect and its evaluation, requires that each Each individual, corporation, partnership, dedicating entity, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall adopt appropriate procedures to-- Evaluate deviations
[X] Within 60 days of discovery
[ ] Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of discovery [ ] Before the next audit.
i 25 of 25 correct.
(
QA Corrective Action Irnplementation Plan Page 1 of 2 Phase 1 Stand-Down Retraining Plan July 161997 1.0 NRC Regulations Examination Report
9.
10 CFR Part 21 Sec. 21.41 Inspections, requires each individual, cogoration, ruiuaship, dedicating entity, or other entity subj:ct to tlu regulations in this part shall permit the Commission to:
i
[ ] Reviewallcorrespondence
[ ] Tap our phones
[X] Inspect records, premises, activities, and basic components.
24 of 25 correct.
10 10 CFR Part 21 Sec. 21.51 Maintenance and inspection of records requires each individual, corporation, partnership, dedicating entity, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part to:
l
[X] Prepare and maintain records.
[ ] Build solid packages
[ ] Pay taxes on time 25 of 25 correct.
l 11.
The auditable records required in 10 CFR Part 21, Sec 21.61(c) are specified in:
[ ] SPEC's License
[ ] SPEC's Company policies
[X] SPEC's QA Program 23 of 25 correct.
Examination Report:
Training on Section 1.0 "NRC Regulations" was administered by Donny Dicharry on 7/16/97 at 8:00 AM to 25 employees in accordance with QA Training plan, Rev (0), and QA Procedure 97-01, Rev (0). Training handouts consisted of copies of selected portions of 10 CFR Parts 21 and 71, and selected portions of SPEC's QA program. The written exam was proctored by Donny Dicharry and George Moran. The exam results for each question are listed above. The exam summary is as follows:
Summary Scores:
11/11 13 143 Correct Answers 10/11 8
80 9/11 3
27 8/11 1
8 Total Examinations:
25 Total Number ofquestions: 275 Total Correct Answers:
258 Percent Correct:
94 %
No re-examinations required.
Report Prepared By:
/
djvh/
7/ 7 R. D (Donny Dicharry, President Date
/k 7
M Report Approved By:
/
[ete Weber, Phase 1 Project Mgr Date QA Corrective Action impiementation Plan Page 2 of 2 Phase I. Stand-Down Retraining Plan July 161997 1.0 NRC Regulations. Examination Report
EXAMINATION - ANSWER SHEET & REPORT for QA Corrective Action Implementation Plan PhaseI Stand-Down Retraining QA Manual & Procedures - Proctor: George Moran i
July 16,1997.
REDEINE PARAGRAPH' NUMBERS:INDICATEREFERENCETOR~ ANSWER t
1-Who is responsible for the planning and implementation of SPEC's Quality Assurance criteria for radioactive material packages ?
13 X
a.
Source Production and Equipment Company, Inc.
b.
Source Production and Equipment Company, Inc. & the NRC c.
The NRC 2.
Who is responsible for administration of SPEC's Quality Assurance Program.
1.3 X
a.
The Quality Assurance Manager b.
The Quality Assurance Manager & the President The Quality Assurance Manager, the President & the General Mgr c.
3.
The President, Vice President, and General Manager are individ'ually associated with various aspects of the Quality Assurance Program. As such, and they are responsible for:
Its a' dequacy a.
b.
periodic audits by management c.
external evaluations where warranted.
2:1
_X_ d.
All of the above 4.
The Quality Assurance Program encompasses the design, fabrication, assembly, testing, use and maintenance of each radioactive material package, including, but not limited to:
Procedures for the design, fabrication, assembly and testing of a.
SPEC packages.
b.
Procedures for establishing that other packages have been designed and manufactured in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements.
Procedures for proper use and maintenance of all packages.
c.
2.3 X
d.
All of the above.
5.
All designs to verify the inclusion of all applicable regulatory requirements in the documentation are reviewed by:
a.
The QA Manager b.
The Vice president b.
The General Manager 32
_X_ c.
The President d.
All of the above
Module A - QA Examination Page 2 6.
Design and specification changes are subject to original criteria and such revisions require the written approval of:
a.
The QA Manager l_
b.
The Vice president j.
b.
The General Manager
'3.7-X c.
The President d.
All of the above l
l' 7.
Procurement documents, when applicable, wi!! specify compliance with the following:
.4;2 X
a.
specific 10 CFR 71 Subpart H identified sections a.
specific 10 CFR 34 Subpart Q identified sections a.
specific 71 CFR 10 Subpart Q identified sections d.
All of the above 8.
All functions performed during fabrication, assembly, use and maintenance which affect package quality will be specified by:
5:1~
X a.
written procedures, instructions and/or drawings, b.
E-mail messages c.
Supervisor's or manager's oral instructions
{
d.
All of the above 9.
The President or General Manager is responsible for approving revisions prior to implementation, and the Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for issuing revisions prior to implementation.
True 6.3
_X_ False 10.
Incoming materials and components will be inspected at receipt to determine their proper identification and to establish that they meet prior specified criteria.
7.6
_ X _ True False 11.
All material, parts and components will be identified by part and/or drawing number which will be located either on the individual item or on records directly associated with the item.
8.1
_X_ True.
False l
12.
Thermal metal joining (TMJ) is performed in m:cordance with the following l
established written procedures which are qualified and approved by the President:
9.1 X
a.
Quality Assurance Manual, Section 9.1 b.
Procedures Manual l
c.
Quality Control Procedures Manual i
i-SATEXT\\QAMANUADQAEXAM2.WPD
Module A - QA Examination Page 3 1
13.
Instrumentation used to mea';ure or evaluate critical parameters related to the safety of a radioactive materias package do not need to be calibrated if the instrument is
- clean and appears to be working satisfactorily.
True 12;t X
False 14.
Shipping papers will be completed as required by l
13.3 X
a.
The DOT.
l-b.
The NRC -
c.
The LDRP -
d.
Ken Joslyn 15.
Items not meeting established criteria will be identified and subject to established procedures for repair, acceptance or disposal. Manufacturing areas or operating stations where the fault originated will be informed.
15.T X-True False 16.
All items which do not meet established Quality Control criteria are reviewed and evaluated to determine if corrective action is warranted by the:
1 a.
The shop foreman b.
The Production Manager 16.1 X
c.
The Quality Assurance Manager d.
The Quality Assurance inspector -
17.
Required regulatory records, including Quality Assurance records which are mandatory and identified under this Program, are maintained in accordance with retention requirements as specified in the Quality Assurance Manual:
17.1 X
a.
Section 17.0, " Quality Assurance Records" b.
Section 3.0, " Design Control" c.
Section 6.0, " Document Control" d.
Section 9.0, " Control ~of Special Processes" Examination Report:
Training on Sections 2.0 "QA Program" and 3.0 "QA Procedures" was administered by George Moran on 7/16/97 at 8:00 AM to 25 employees in accordance with QA Training plan, Rev (0),
and QA Procedure 97-01, Rev (0). Training handouts consisted of copies of selected portions of the SPEC QA Manual. The written exams were proctored by Donny Dicharry and George Moran.
The combined exam scores e as shown on the attached report. No reexaminations are required.
Report Prepared By:
d /07]
'G.,
'rt Vice President Dat
- Report Approved By: 's
//A
'7 feh]
fete Weber, Phase I Project Mgr D6te
~
I I
s:\\TEXTTQAMANUADQAExAM2.WPD
l i
MODULE A-QA TRAINING
(
NRC REGULATIONS & QA MANUAL JULY 16,1997 EXAMINATION SCORES NAME SCORE Ken Joslyn 100 %
Kenny Carrington 96 Pete Weber 100 Joe Fryer 96 Kevin Schehr 100 Mike Frizell 93-Steve Punch 100 Tony Bustillo 96 Karen Robicheaux 100 Gwen Montalbano Absent Kelly Laiche 100 Renee Agurcia Absent Tiffany Templet Absent Paul Guess 93 Henry Moore 93 Newton Robert 100 Tommie Ruiz 93 Michael Williams 100 Jason Aucoin Absent Mark Albarado 89 Steve Byrd 100 Donny Faucheux 89 Mitchell Guillory Absent Danny Guillot 85 Tim Perrin 93 Kip Nichol 100 Dane Picone 93 Mike Thompson 74 Shane Trahan 93 Robert Lawrason 81
SUMMARY
- Everyone present this date successfully completed the Module A QA training program.
G.C. MORAN HMVP\\ SPEC \\AUDmEXAMSCR.WPD
TRAINING PLAN FOR TRAVELERS, INSPECTION FORMS &
STICKERS AND PROCEDURES Training will be held At James Drive West Bldg.
8AM Thurs. 7/17/97 The following personnel will attend this training: Approximately 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
Ken Joslyn, Jason Aucoin, Mark Albarado, Mitchell'Guillory, Danny Guillot, Tony i
Bustillo, Kip Nichol, Donny Faucheaux, Tim Perrin, Newton Robert, Dane Picone, Tommie Ruiz, Michael Thompson, Shane Trahan,, Michael Williams, Tiffany Templet
{
Henry Moore, Steve Byrd and Tommie Ruiz.
The training session will include: an overview of the content of each traveler, a discussion of the purpose of the system and the importance of following the steps religiously and assuring that the current revision is being used. Training will also include the correct method and form to be used in requesting a change to a traveleror procedure, inspection forms that are part of the system and the understanding and recognition of the accept, reject and provisional inspection stickers used on the parts and assemblies. There will be a brief discussion on drawings with emphasis on using approved drawings and the correct revision. Training will be followed by a question and answer -
session, then a written test to assure that everyone understands and is able to follow and use the system. Students will be required to answer 80% of the questions correctly, or be scheduled for further training.
1 The training will include the following documents. Each attendee will be supplied with a copy 1
SPEC-150 MAIN TRAVELER l
LOCK END ASSYMINI-TRAVELER HANDLE ASSY MINI-TRAVELER i
ASM LOCK MODULE MINI-TRAVELER OUTLET PANEL MINI-TRAVELER LOCK CAP ASSY MINI-TRAVELER l
SAFETY PLUG ASSY. MINI TRAVELER D U SHIELD MINI-TRAVELER BUTTON HEAD BOLT MINI-TRAVELER TUNGSTEN SHIM MINI-TRAVELER l
INNER BULKHEAD MINI-TRAVELER OUTLET END PLATE MINI-TRAVELER DEVICE LOCK SHAFT MINI-TRAVELER
}
RELEASE PLUG ASSY MINI-TRAVELER SEAR LINKAGE MINI-TRAVELER KEY ASSY MINI-TRAVELER CONTROL ADP. ASSY MINI-TRAVELER REWORK TRAVELERS FORM QA 5.2 DOCUMENT CHANGE REQUEST 4
FORM QA 15.1 NONCONFORMING MATERIAL REPORT (NCR)
SPEC FORM 1.8 ENGINEERING CHANGE REQUEST (ECR) i FORM QA 8.11.1 EQUIPMENT FAILURE REPORT (EFR)
FORM QA 16.1 CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST (CAR)
FORM QA 3.2 EQUIVALENT ITEM AUTHORIZATION RECORD (EIA)
FORM QA 5.2 DOCUMENT CHANGE REQUEST (DCR)
FORM QA 6.1 DOCUMENT REVISION IDENTIFICATION LOG (DR)
FORM QA 5.1 DOCUMENT CHANGE EVALUATION (DCE)
FORM QA 14.1 RECEIVING INSPECTION DECALS -
FORM QA 14.2 INPROCESS/ FINAL INSPECTION DECALS FORM QA 14.3 PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE DECAL Drawing 150000 Rev (2) and Drawing 150100 Rev.(2)
H:\\ text \\qa\\traveltr.ain
TEST for QA FORMS, DRAWINGS and TRAVELER SYSTEM TRAINING NAME DATE
. DEPT.
SCORE l.
What is the current revision and date of the SPED 150 MAIN TRAVELER 7 2.
What is to be entered after each step in the blank spaces provided in any of TRAVELERS?
3.
IF you make a mistake in entering a number, date etc., how do you fix it?
1 4.
In step 16A on the main traveler, what is the number of the drill fixture to be used in accomplishing that step?
5.
How many parts are listed in the PARTS LIST of the LOCK END PLATE ASSEMBLY l
MINI _ TRAVELER 7 6.
How many steps are there in the RELEASE PLUNGER ASSEMBLY f
MINI _ TRAVELER # 1506357_
7.
In the DEVICE LOCKSHAFT AND LOCK ARM ASSEMBLY TRAVELER where does step 6 say to route to?
8.
What does it say to do in step 7 of the LOCK CAP ASSEMBLY MINI _ TRAVELER?
9.
What does it say to do in the last step of the ASM LOCK MODULE ASSEMBLY MINI _ TRAVELER?
10 WHAT is the number of the form to be used in requesting a change to a traveler?
11.
On drawing 150000 what is the length of the SPEC-150 Exposure Device?
12.
On drawing 150100 Rev. (2) what is the length of the housing cover?
13.
Has drawing 150100 Rev.(2) been approved.?
1 i
14.
_What form is used to request a change in a procedure?
15.
What form is a CAR 7 COMMMENTS:
l l-i i
i i
I
- H:TEXTlQAlTRAVELTR.AIN i
4 l.
j RA VELERS, iW3?2cifo/ fvkMS, YMyypagg3 DRAM 4f I
QA TRAINING I
SIGN IN SHEET C
JULY 16,1997 b T'H3 !
'7 l
00VO Ken Joslyn Q%
Kenny Carrington 6f4.Tsev Pete Weber G wAsq eb Joe Fryer Gu 2,/x aA_
Kevin Schehr V /A. e s 25 C Mike Frizell 7 6 /,Pc Steve Punch
\\/
d D. j l c o#'0 Tony Bustillo x
Karen Robicheaux
\\ v4 6/45c Gwen Montalbano v/:
x'. c e w / G #
Kelly Laiche W
sxz!<
Renee Agurcia O 7/e c E 97c Tiffany Templet sv y
l-i h,u.
6/PxE L Paul Guess A!;e
- 1Echr$,w.
i M Pu Henry Moore m LYYs.euo A 9C? kC Newton Robert I r f6 0 Ec Tommie Ruiz enh5 [ve C)
,)o pc.,
Michael Williams 7/ [at[76///dv,w Jason Aucoin O U I S/c.#
dl' 44//*//((M '
03 I6 Mark Albarndo
/
W#
Zhuay hchanF
/
$dAU ~
/
C fe
$sWCe fl]ot2M
^
g
l l o o *%, Steve Byrd 8'
/
b % M, j933'70 Donny Faucheux v
% 3
- I E0 itchell Guillory 7AET % Nd WiA/. /rp?.o[ M/6/1
~
~
&MA Danny Guillot
..- a
,/.drSt
//
93;J fg Tim Perrin 4,
f/A W y
y-
' Ido 70 Kip Nichol ih[%ek7 100 *?d Dane Picone 4lWo ifo)'M) Mike Thompson
%d A;h
%3 5 9O ShaneTrahan bkM 1
l l
,