ML20149F640

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Util 831109,840629 & 850702 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2 (Part1), Equipment Classification (Program for All Safety-Related Components)

ML20149F640
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	02/09/1988
From:	Abelson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Brons J POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8802170292
Download: ML20149F640 (4)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

p.

February 9, 1988 t

Docket No. 50-333 DISTRIBUTION 055EEEEJi}ey OGC PDI-1 Rdg. EJordan CVogan JPartlow HAbelson ACRS(10)

Mr. John C. Brons NRCPDR JJohnson,RI Executive Vice President, Nuclear Local PDR Generation BBoger Power Authority of the State SVarga of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONA.L INFORMATION FOR ITEM 2.2 (."ART 1) 0F GENERIC LETTER 83-28, EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION (PROGRAM FOR ALL SAFETY PELATED COMPONENTS)

We have reviewed your responses dated November 9, 1983, June 29, 1984, and July 2,1985 concerning the subject item and have identified a need for additional infomation. In order to complete our review of this item, we request that you provide us with the infomation discussed in the enclosure.

Please have your staff provide me with your anticipated date of reply.

Sincerely, Harvey Abelson, Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects, I/II

Enclosure:

As stated  :

cc: See next page SF ,

PDI-1 PM- PDI-1 CYogan HAbelson RCapra 2/ /88 2/)/88 2/9/88 8802170292 800209 .

DR ADOCK O 33

6 5

Mr. John C. Brons James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Authority of the State of New York Power Plant cc:

Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein Ms. Donna Ross Assistant General Counsel New York State Energy Office Power Authority of the State  ? Empire State Plaza of New York 16th Floer 10 Columbus Circle Albany, New York 12223 New York, New York 10019 Resident Inspector's Office U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Admiristrator, Pegion I Post Office Box 136 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Lycoming, New York 13093 475 Allendale Road ring of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19206 Mr. Radford J. Converse Mr. A. Klausman Resident Manager Senior Vice President - Appraisal James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear and Compliance Services Power Plant Power Authority of the State Post Office Box 41 of New York Lycoming, New York 13093 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. J. A. Gray, Jr. Mr. George Wilverding, Manager Director Nuclear Licensing - BWR Nuclear Safety Evaluation Power Authority of the State Power Authority of the State of New York of New York 123 Main Street 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601 White Plains, New York 10601 ,

Mr. Robert P. Jones Supervisor Mr. R. E. Beedle Town of Scriba Vice President Nuclear Support R. D. f4 Power Authority of the State Oswego, New York 13126 of New York 123 Main Street Mr. J. P. Bayne, President White Plains, New York 10601 Power Authority of the State of New York Mr. S. S. Zulla 10 Columbus Circle Vice President Nuclear Engineering New York, New York 10019 Power Authority of the State of New York Mr. Richard Patch 123 Main Street Quality Assurance Superintendent White Plains, New York 10601 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Mr. R. Burns Post Office Box 41 Vice President Nuclear Operations Lycoming, New York 13093 Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601

h REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

_ ITEM 2.2 (PART 1)

JAMES A. FITZPA(RICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-333 Item 2.?.1 (Program):-

The licensee's response described their existing safety-related equipment classification program and further stated that they are converting some compenent identification functions to a computer based system. The response fails to describe the scope of either system, describe the computer based system, confirm that all safety-related components are included, and confirm that the end result is a single, concise, and unambiguous source for identification of safety-related components.

The licensee needs to expand their description of their equipment classification program for safety-related equipment to define the scope of both their computer based system and their present non-computerized system and to show that they have a program that provides a single, concise, and unambiguous source for identification of safety-related components. In addition, the licensee needs to confirm that these components are designated as safety-related en all documents and information handling systems that are used to control activities that may affect components.

Item ?.2.1.2 (Information Pandling System):

In their response describino their information handling system, the licensee refers interchangeaably to a list and lists (of components) and it is not cine that there is a single, consistent, and unambiguous source for identification of safety-related components. In addition, a computerized system is mentioned but it was not described nor was its place in the system clearly explained.

I The licensee needs to describe clearly how thiir program functions to provide a single, concise, and unambiguous source of classification information for safety-related components. Also, if the licensee is ennverting to a l computerized listing, this fact should be confirmed, the new system should be described including how the listing is verified, maintained, revised, and validated, and a schedule for the changeover included.

l I

o 3

Item 2.2.1.5 (Design Verification and Procurement)

The licensee's response does not show that the procurement specifications for safety-related components and parts specifically require the supplier to include verification of design capability and evidence of testino performed which qualifies these components and parts for service under the expected conditions over the life of the component or part. In addition, the quoted procedure does not reouire that the information handling system be consulted to determine whether or not a component is safety-related.

The licensee needs to show that Engineering Design Procedure (EDP)-16 requires suppliers to include verification of design capability and evidence of testing which qualifies the components for service under the expected conditions over the life of the component or part or that the procedure will be revised or supplemented to meet these requirements. Also, the licensee should clarify that the classificatinn information handling system is consulted to identify safety-related components so that replacement parts or components will carry the proper classification and reet the requirements for such safety-related components.

Y l

i l

i