ML20148Q360

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 781012 NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Inspec Repts 50-445 & 50-446.Corrective Actions:Procedure for Identification of Significant Deficiencies Rev to Incl Checklist of Items.Responsible QA Member Informed of Proc
ML20148Q360
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 11/07/1978
From: Gary R
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To: Seidle W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20148Q351 List:
References
NUDOCS 7811300020
Download: ML20148Q360 (2)


Text

-

O TEN AS l'Til.lTIES GENEIL\\ TING CO.TIP.\\NY 15 8 : lifti \\N iim t61 Is%t1.\\3 ti N is -e November 7, 1978

" > T,"f, TXX-2903 Mr. W. C. Seidle, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Of fice of Inspection & Enforcement 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Docket Mos. 50-445 50-446 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1981-83 2300 MW INSTALLATION RESPONSE TO NRC LETTER DATED OCTOBER 12, 1978 DOCKET fiOS. 50-445 & 50-446 FILE NO. 10130

Dear Mr. Seidle:

We have reviewed your letter of October 12, 1978 relative to inspection i

activities performed by your resident inspector, Mr. R. G. Taylor, of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit Nas. CPPR-126 and 127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2.

We here-with respond to the finding included as Appendix A of your letter.

To aid in understanding of our response, we have repeated the require-ment and your finding followed by our comments and proposed action.

We believe the attached information to be responsive to the Inspector's findings.

In you have any questions, please advise.

Very truly yours,

/

i R./J. Gary RJG;dla At tac!, men t i

'81130002o i

e

Response to NRC Letter dated October 12, 1978 TXX-2903 Page 2 Failure to Promptly Report a Significant Deficieng 10 CFR 50.55(e)(2) states, "The holder of a construction permit shall, within twenty-four hours, notify the appropriate Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection and Enforcement Regional Office of each reportable de fi ci ency. "

Contrary to the above:

A Brown & Root craf t labor superintendent reported to a responsible member of your Quality Assurance organization at approximately 5 p.m.

on October 2,1978, that a "Cadueld" in the Unit 1 containment wall had pulled apart while positioning an attached length of 18-S rebar.

Your Quality Assurance organization apprised the on-site NRC Resident inspec-tor assigned to the Region IV office of this significant construction deficiency at approxinately 10:00 a.m. on October 4,1978, approximately forty-one hours af ter initial identification of the apparent reportable deficiency.

This item of noncompliance is a deficiency.

(

Corrective Action:

It is our intent to comply fully with the regulations governing the CPSES facility.

We will implement the actions discussed below to assure that potentially significant deficiencies are reported in a timely manner.

1) We have revised our procedure for identification of significant deficiencies to include a checklist of items that shall be consid-ered with regard to reportability under 10 CFR 50.55(e). This format will be consistent with draf t guidelines made available to us by your Resident Inspector.

2)

Each responsible member of our Quality Assurance organization has been made aware of the actions we propose to take and will receive formal indoctrination as soon as the revised procedure is fully developed.

Date of Full Comoliance, i

These actions will be fully implemented by November 30, 1978.