ML20148M541
| ML20148M541 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Green County  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1978 |
| From: | Lewis S NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Cole R, Ferguson G, Goodhope A Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148M544 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811220058 | |
| Download: ML20148M541 (3) | |
Text
et I l%
.MG PUBLIC DOCUENI nggg
't 37, UNITED STATES C)
I i
/s y&
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 h
y
%, V...../
November 7,1978 b
a Andrew C. Goodhope, Esq., Chairman Dr. George A. Ferguson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Professor of Nuclear Engineering 3320 Estelle Terrace Howard University Wheaton, Maryland 20906 Washington, D. C. 20001 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety ard Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commiss;on Washington, D. C. 20555
%f In the Matter of POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (Greene County Nuclear Power Plant)
Docket No. 50-549 Gentlemen:
Under cover of this letter the NRC Staff is filing its direct supplemental (to the SER and Supplement 1) testimony on radio-logical health and safety matters, as required by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's " Order Scheduling Further Pro-ceedings in the Health and Safety Hearing" (August 1,1978).
The Staff's testimony is listed below:
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Columbia County Survival Committee-Reuter, Stipulated Contention 9 (Accidental Releases to Water Supply),
by Larry W. Bell, Gale P. Turi, and James A. Martin.
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Greene County et al., Stipulated Contention I.A (Security), by Michael J. Gaitanis.
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff on Emergency Procedures, by James A. Martin Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley, Stipulated Contention I.B.1 (External Flooding), by Gale P. Turi and Marcus Greenberg.
7811226057 - (y 1
l
i l
.. ~
Supplercntal Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley, Stipulated Contention I.B.2 (Missile Protection), by James J.
Watt,.Marcus Greenberg, Felix Litton, and Frank 1
Rinaldi.
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley, Stipulated Contention I.B.4 (Valve Submergence), by James J.
Watt.
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley, Stipulated Contention I.8,5 (Systems Seoaration), by Spottswood B, Burwell and Joseph P. Joyce.
Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Cituens to Preserve the Hudson Valley,) Stipulated Contention I.B,6 (Occupattonal Exposure, by 1
Thomas D Murphy, Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff in Response to Columbia County Surytyal Conmittee-Reuter, Stipulated Jacques B, J, Re( Airplane Impact Design), by Contention 5.a ad, Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff on Geology of e
the Proposed Site, by Donald M, Galdwell and John A, Kc]hher, Supplemental Testimony of NRC Staff on Safe Shutdown EarthquakeandRelationshipofquarryingtoSetsmicity, e
by John A, Kelleher, l
The Staff's testimony in response to the portion of Ctttzens to Preserye the ji'Jdson Valley, Sttpulated Contention I,A which deals with control over the exclusion area ts contained in Section 2,1,2 of the SER and Supplement 1, The sponsortng witness will be Larry & Bell, The remaining radiological health and safety issues will be treated in Supplement 2 to the SER, These i;ssues are;
~
i 1
.3-l i
Financial qualifications.
-l Meteorological aspects of exclusion area acceptability (Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley, Stipulated ContentionI.A).
The Staff's analysis of the relevance of " generic safety 1ssues" to this proceeding.
1 Containment isolation (Citizens to Preserve the Hudson Valley,StipulatedContentionI.B.3).
i The effects of blasting at quarries.
The Staff has reviewed the Board's August 1,1978 order and computes the future schedule as follows:
November 27, 1978 - Motions for summary disposition (includes five days for mailing of testimony).
December 12, 1978 - Answers to motions for summary disposition (includes five days for mailing of motions).
The order calls for a prehearing conference within 15 days of the filing of answers to motions for summary disposition or as soon as practicable thereafter.
In view of the intervening nolidays, the Staff assumes the prehearing conference would not be held before early January,1979.
j Sincerely, f px h. kn Stephe H. Lewis Counsel for NRC Staff l
l
Enclosures:
1 As stated j
i cc w/ Enclosures Greene County Service List l
i l
1 l
2