ML20148G689

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests Addl Info to Facilitate Review of Util Frosstey Fuel Performance Code Described in Rept RECo-FMS-003.Use of Frosstey for Input to LOCA Analysis & Determination of end-of-life Internal Rod Pressure Should Be Indicated
ML20148G689
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/20/1988
From: Martin R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Bauer E
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
References
TAC-65871, NUDOCS 8801270005
Download: ML20148G689 (3)


Text

-

~

=.

January 20,-1988 Docket No. 50-277/278 Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Vice President and General counsel i

Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia,-Pennsylvania 19101

Dear Mr. Bauer:

SUBJECT:

PECO FROSSTEY FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE (TAC NO. 65871)

As a result of the staff consultant's review at PNL, we find that the.

following additional information is needed to facilitate the review of the PECo FROSSTEY fuel perfomance code described in the PECo report PECo-FMS-003.

1.

Does the licensee intend to use FROSSTEY for input to LOCA' analyses and the determination of end-of-life internal rod pressure? If'so, it should be noted that additional code verification (both in terms of themal and fission gas release) is needed to demonstrate that-the conservatisms in the code and the code input are sufficient.to account for the overall predictive uncertainties in the LOCA and internal rod pressure analyses.

If not, please state which licensing analyses the FROSSTEY code will be used to support, e.g., in reload applications, would it support the analyses for one-percent cladding strain or hot channel analyses of CPR7 J

2.

In order to evaluate the licensee's proficiency in the use of FROSSTEY, please provide the FROSSTEY input used to calculate hot channel gap conductance and volume average temperature versus burnup for batches 8 and 13 in the submitted report.

How many individuals (including any non-PECo personnel) were involved in the modeling of input to the code?

Indicate their particular contribution to each of the four test exercises.

Please indicate what steps PEco has taken to ensure that the level of expertise which has been demonstrated in this series of exercises-will be maintained in the future.

Should you have questions, please feel free to contact us.

20 Sincerely,

^

$$f b

/s/

P Robert E. Martin, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc:

Service List DISTRIBUTION

-[Dectet me.]

RMartin/RClark NRC"PDR/LPDR' OGC PDI-2 Reading EJordan SVarga/BBoger

.1Partlow WRutler ACRS (10)

M0'Rrien JWu

/$/PM PDI-2/D rtin:r.c WButler 0/88

/,C/88 l

[$ CtQ a

'o UNITED STATES

~,,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c

h

.E WASHINGTON, D. C 20555 g

g January 20, 1988 Docket No. 50-277/278 Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.

Vice President and General counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101

Dear Mr. Bauer:

SUBJECT:

PECO FROSSTEY FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE (TAC NO. 65871)

As a result of the staff consultant's review at PNL, we find that the following additional information is needed to facilitate the review of the PECo FROSSTEY fuel performance code described in the PECo report PECo-FMS-003, 1.

Does the licensee intend to use FROSSTEY for input to LOCA analyses and the detemination of end-of-life internal rod pressure? If so, it should be noted that additional code verification (both in terms of thermal and fission gas release) is needed to demonstrate that the conservatisms in the code and the code input are sufficient to account for the overall predictive uncertainties in the LOCA and internal rod pressure analyses.

If not, please state which licensing analyses the FROSSTEY code will be used to support, e.g., in reload applications, would it support the analyses for one-percent cladding strain or hot channel analyses of CPR?

2.

In order to evaluate the licensee's proficiency in the use of FROSSTEY, please provide the FROSSTEY input used to calculate hot channel gap conductance and volume average temperature versus burnup for batches 8 and 13 in the submitted report.

How many individuals (including any non-PECo personnel) were involved in the modeling of input to the code?

Indicate their particular contribution to each of the four test exercises.

Please indicate what steps PEco has taken to ensure that the level of expertise which has been demonstrated in this series of exercises will be maintained in the future.

Should you have questions, please feel free to contact us.

Sincerely, Robert E. M d Martin, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc:

Service List i

Mr. E. G. Bauer, Jr.

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station.

Philadelphia Electric Company Units 2 and 3 Cc:

Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.

Mr. R. A. Heiss, Coordinator 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Pennsylvania State Clearinghouse Washington, D.C. 20006 Governor's Office of State Planning and Development Philadelphia Electric Company P. O. Box 1323 ATTN: Mr. D. M. Smith, Manager Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Staticn Route 1, Box 208 Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 Bureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of Mr. J. W. Gallagher, Vice President Environmental Resources Nuclear Operations P.O. Box 2063 Philadelphia Electric Company Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Mr. Albert R. Steel, Chairman Board of Supervisors Mr. W. M. Alden Peach Bottom Township Engineer-In-Charge-Licensing R. D. #1 Philadelphia Electric Company Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Mr. Gary Mock P.O. Rox 09181 Morgan J. Morris, III Columbus, Ohio 43209 General Manager - Operating Services Atlantic Electric Mr. Thomas S. Shaw, Jr.

P. O. Box 1500 Vice President - Production 1199 Black Horse Pike Delmarva Power and Light Company Pleasantville, New Jersey 08232 800 King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19899 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Mr. Tom Magette Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Power Plant Research Program P. O. Box 399 Department of Natural Resources Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 B-3 Tawes State Office Building Regional Administrator, Region I Annapolis, Maryland 21401 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 631 Park Avenue Mr. Roland Fletcher King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Department of Environment 201 West Preston Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201

-