ML20148F144

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Addl Info Re Util 740318 Tech Specs Changes for New Incore Instrumentation Package Installation.Response Required by 740530
ML20148F144
Person / Time
Site: Yankee Rowe
Issue date: 05/13/1974
From: Purple R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Heider L
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8011030845
Download: ML20148F144 (2)


Text

.

(y r

. # t -

a

.! P iW DISTRIBUTION: 3 Docket File j AEC PDR  %

M y 3 zgp Branch Reading JRBuchanan, ORNL f,J:,

Dock.t tio. 50-29 RAPurple, L:0R-1 ABurger, L:0R-1 h

.gt; SATeets, L:0R-1 g.

R0 (3) t.ji

'Jankco Atode Lloctric Co pany OGC Niib: dr. L.11. licider ACRS (16) g[G: ;)

Assistant Vice Precident TJCarter, L:0R j 20 Turnpike Road SVarga, L:RP , v, 1.'estooro, hansachusetta 015S1 KRGoller, L:0R f

Ocn tleracn :

?!y lettar dated icrch 13, 1974, you cubr.itted chanacs to the 'Iechnical Specifications appended to Licence cio. DPR-3 that would allow installa-tion of a new incore instrut.:entation package for the Yankee-Rowe reactor. ](

y Uc have reviewed your subnittal and fouad that additional infort:ation is required to corglete our review. The needed information and schedulen care diccussed with Mr. C. Andonnini of your staff during a discussion *h on tbc telephona on April 16, 1974.  %

342 e.c:.acmunt A to thin letter identifies for the record the additional M aformation that we have requested durint; the recent to.lophone discussion.

In order to raintain our review schedule, we need acceptable responses [Ah not later than May 30, 1974. @

Sincerely, b

?W

\7 \ .%

I:,If g

MS Robert A. Purple, Chief 6 Operating Reactors Branch s1 Direct. orate of Licensing (f R

?!

Caclocure: @.I Attachucat A - Additional  :,

  • 6 ,n 2 Infore.ation on Yankee-Rowe __

_ . _ hk W

Tills DOCUMENT CONTAINS Qf POOR QUA!JTY PAGES A w- --

&y.* ,

m%

'4 M

2 1

1 sc

?:1:

, , , , , , . L:0RB #1 L:0RB #1 7 *

.u.~ ,,, , ABurger:lb ..

RAPurp1 v' _

o.,,, 5/13/]4 @- 5//3 /74

. m A 6 C 314 ( H et 9 5); A EChi 02 40 s.o c43 se e s a s s. s a o.a e a

. . . . . . , - ~ -

80110s0 8V5-

~

, i h i

3 ,

9 1

< ATTACIC-fEHT A ,

r AImITIONAL DIFOPliATION Oli YAhTJ'E-ROUE 1

TISTALIATION OF A MEU U! Cone DISTRU,'C2?TATION. PACKAGE DOCITT No. 50-29 y

= ,

J.:

YANrJ.E AT0!fIC EEECTRIC CO!!P/Jn'.  ?

ke- .*

?

1. Provide a deceription of the nov incore instrumentation pachace in ( >

sufficient dots.11 cer:parabic to the description in t.hc present. pagen f.-

107:1 through 107:8, including Figure 1 included in the Technical 1 Specifications. A

2. Provide a figure or figurco that will depict the important details 4!

of the fluc thithic scaling system at the vessel ports cor.: parable to details shown in the present Fir.urce 107:4A and 107:4L.

i .l '

3. Describe in sufficient dotail the thit61c icak detection system and b how you vill provide for isolation of individual thimbles. y ,
  1. j
4. Travide the basis for your conclusion that the totc1 fiev nnd the .  !

flou distribution in the reactor vessel will not be changed cig- , i nificantly as a result of the installarionoof the nodified support i structure in the upper plcuum. T;

's . Justify the use of the conoseals and svagescals in the recctor vcsoci .

head port ascorblics as /JISI U18.2 Safety Ciuds I featuren.

t. Provide conurance that it is unlikely that potentini flou-induced -!

vibration of the thimbles in the upper plenut vill cause failurc j of a thieble or a thitbic avageceal. ,N , i s

7. Ancucinc a thitble were to fail and would be isolated, will the ,

kl thiehic up to the isolation valve be protected against potential 3j danano from missiles to precludo uncontrolled 1cchase of primary J @!

coolent7 -js it i

~.

\ &h

\ h or f.

.e 3 [

y ,

I t hl z.

pj i i

o** . . . . . . . _

' b***"t* . . . . . . .

2*+t* ,

h e*o c48 to e ,4 + s. , sae.nos i form A!0..il' ' R ev. 9 5 3) AICM 02 0

)