ML20148E664

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 800902 Memo Re Std for Qualification of safety- Related Equipment.Proposal for Qualification of All Types of safety-related Equipment Has Merit;However Scope of Program May Be Broadened to Cover More than Equipment Qualification
ML20148E664
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/03/1980
From: Minogue R
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19252A551 List:
References
FOIA-81-97, TASK-OS, TASK-SC-014-1, TASK-SC-14-1 NUDOCS 8010280540
Download: ML20148E664 (2)


Text

- - .

. c f.

w

, 00T 3 1980 a

MEMORANDUM FOR: H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

'FROM: R. B. Minogue. Director, OSD SU8 JECT: STANDARD FOR QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT i

This letter responds to your letter of September 2,1980, requesting us to

" evaluate the aavisability of developing in a broad single rulemaking action an amendment to 10 CFR 50 which would include 1) the rulemaking directed by the Comission, ca environmental qualification of electrical equipment (CLI-80-2{,

[ 2) the rulemaking proposed in the Comission paper from I&E (SECY-80-139), on

! independent verification and testing and inspection of equipment's environmental qualifications, and 3) broadly address the qualification of both electrical and mechanical equipment (including chemical process equipment such as hydrogen recombiners) for seismic and dynamic loading conditions as well as other environ-mental conditions."

i Your proposal, that a comprehensive r51emaking addressing all aspects of qualifi- l cation of all type of safety related equipment be developed, has merit. However, we do have a concern that the expanded assignment could cause delays in completing the highest priority. item, namely the Comission order, since there is a wide variance in the status of: 1) time commitments and estimated completions for those phases of the program already in process, and 2) available supporting NUREGS, Rog. Guides and National Standards.

! A number of standards and regulatory guides are available on qualification of I i electrical equipment, whereas some standards are in varying stages of development I

and no regulatory guides ut presently available on qualification of mechanical equipment. Without the detailed standards required for implementation, the rule i could be judged impractical. Therefore, due to the deficiency in mechanical equip-  !

ment standards, we are considering an advance notice of proposed rulemaking for the broad rule.

Since receipt of your letter, we have leAcned that the independent verification , ;:

j i testing may programto is be broadened to include cover far more than a third partyqualification.

equipment accreditation system and the I /

, In view of these coglications, we believe it to be more expedient to start the l project as three separate and concurrent items whh.n we will attempt to consolidate r

i THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 8010280 ft/ d POOR QUAUTY PAGES OFFICE > .

I SURNAME >

t j DATE > . . . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NRC Form 318A (4 79) NRCM 02040 e u . . . . . v . . . . = , . . . = e.=. .. c . c a . . . . - . . .

,, 1 H. R. DentcL 2 OCT 3 1980

into a single'pbckage as shown in the enclosure. This approach will provide
more flexibility in the event any single portion of the task could be completed early, or. if the progran is modified. It it appears that each phase requires a hearing, we would attempt to combine the rules for a single hearing.

l The entire program is an extensive undertaking and will require careful monitoring

-l and inputs and agreements from NRR and I&E. We can't lost-sight of the Commissioners l

OrderrequiringtheelectricalequipmentqualificationrulemakingsinceithasouR highest priority. At present, it is also the ites with the most- potential for early release.

In conclusion, we plan to start the program as 3 separate and concurrent items which"will attempt to consolidate into the single package you requested. Clari-fication and justification for this plan will be more evident and can be more readily finalized after the program is better defined with Task Initiation Forms and Preliminary Value Impact Statements.

! We will maintain close contact with your staff to diset/ss progress, problems and any modifications to the program. A preliminary scheoule outlining this under-taking is enclosed.

OM8 1::a gy maan.C n mg i

Robert B. Hinogue, Director

Office of Standards Development

Enclosure:

Preliminary Schedule l

CONTACTY H. I. Gregg.

443-5997 DISTRIBUTION:

Central Files SD R/S l,

SCSB R/S i RBMinogue RSmith

! GAArlotto l WMMorrison WFAnderson

! ECWenzinger Rho VSNoonan ZRRosztoczy  ! I RES CHofmayer RWKlecker EC r I l

PADiBasedettp ,/ 9/3 0/80 I l-Task tw SC om.-l f A , _o 1 omcc> , , , ,

S CSB DES:SCSB ADGES ,_] ,

D DK/ DD:Sp _ ,_

suns w e . HI'Gregg:sp ,

'WFAndersony kWMMorriso ,,

G riotto RSm RBMinogue,_ l

] WE- _,.. 9#R8.0 _9Bpl80.,,,, ,,9/$Q80.. ,, ,j/~MB0... . 9LA/B0.. AL380;,,

NRC Form 318814 79) NRCM 0240 gg pgggaapgen paggpae gpma; em . . .