ML20147H461
| ML20147H461 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1988 |
| From: | Callan L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Campbell G ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803080492 | |
| Download: ML20147H461 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000313/1987031
Text
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _ - _ _
4
.:
4 M
s
~
'In-Reply Refer To:
Document Contains
Dockets:
50-313/87-31-
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
50-368/87-31
o
v
' Arkansas Power & Light; Company
'}
ATTN: Mr. Gene Campbell
-Vice President, Nuclear
Operations
P.O.-Box 551
Little' Rock, Arkansas- 72203
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of February 1,1988, informing NRC of your
implementation schedule to modify the. perimeter security system using a design
basis study to determine a comprehensive perimeter security system.
This
response supplements your response of December 21, 1987, to our letter and'
Notice of Violation dated November 19, 1987. We have reviewed your imple-
mentation schedule and have no questions at this time. We will review the
proposed modifications to your perimeter security system during a future
inspection to determine that the implementation schedule is being achieved and
will be maintained.
Until the perimeter security system is upgraded, we will
-expect effective compensatory measures to be utilized as required.
Sincerely,
Citical Signed By:
L. J. CALLAN
L. J. Callan, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
cc:
$
M E'
Arkansas Nuclear One
l
!*8 '
ATTN:
J. M. Levine, Director
'
Site Nuclear Operations
'
- @
P.O. Box 608
_
Russellville, Arkansas 72801
CD:3
- ct.o URE coNTAINS
I
f
i,piscRMATION.
~
e.
.
Arkansas Radiation Control Program Director
g
l
g 7agg
@#
bec:
(see next page)
PAG 2 13 DECETRC'lE0*
-m
1
0 0:
RIV:
- RPSB
C:P
RPSB
C:RPSB
D
[
D:DRP
RACa
ell /jt
RJE
tt
LAYandef
LJCallan
S/t/88
1/t/88
'3/)/88
g g /88
$ /.) /88
f
Document Con. an,ns
Q
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
/y
.
.
- - . - . - - _ - -
- _ .
-
.
- .
,
V.':..
'
R
> Arkansas Power and Lish't Company.
-2-
s
_.
.
.
'
- bec w/ copy of-licensee's response w/ safeguards:
~
-RIV Security File-
-P. A.'Starcher, RSGB/NRR
'
Resident; Inspector
R. D.'. Martin, RA.
R.-L._Bangart, 0RSS
Security Inspector
RPSB Security File
.
c-w/ copy of licensee's response w/o safeguards:
-
-
B'IE-04-
ORP
'\\
Lisa Shea, R /ALF-
Section Chief, ORP/A
RIV File
MIS
RSTS Operator
-RPSB'
R. E. Hall, DRSS
-
Project Engineer, 0RP/A
.
- G. Dick, NRR Project. Inspector
.I
r
,
r
.
\\
?
ENCLOSURE CONTAINS
.S/JEGU/M3 INFORMAT10N.
!
UPON SEPARAYlON THIS
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED.
.
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
n
,4
<
,,
i
-
.. , p;3 9 6
.mn
' .:. !:
!.
<
.
l.
h
i li M A TIO N
'
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
December 21, 1987
g
g
{
. . . . . . ,
,
,
.
0.
.
!
DEC 2 41987
f.h
s
.
BCAN128707
1
!
L. J. Callan, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'
Region IV
j
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000
i
Arlington, Texas 76011
,
SUBJECT:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2
,
Docket Nos. 50-313/50-368
g
i
License No. 2 R-51 and NPF-6
i
Respcose to Inspcction Report
j
50-313/37-31 and 50-368/87-31
Dear Mr. Callan:
1
l
Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201, a response to the
!
violations identified in the subject inspection report is
submitted.
The attached material contains Safeguards Information as defined by
10CFR73.21 and should be handled appropriately.
Sincerely,
,,
,
M
J. H. Lev ne
Executive Director,
ANO Site Operations
.
i
j
JHL:J0J:djm
enclosure - Safeguards Information
i
i
ENCLOSl?.m c m \\;ys
.
SAT:EGUA'
.
r j,g7;og
c
UPO N C '.\\!.i;.
' Ti a 3
(;-.-,,,
.
P/,CE p, prp;ym ; , . .cy ,
t/, [ ' i', d ,' ; . ., ..,, ,
4j 3
,
,' 3,' r.f,'!, f * * 5 'i 'h* h i,f h
O a4 t U Ef * lb
- 7 ?
,.
O- #
4, _1
..
,,
MEMSER p.* DOLE SoutM utsLitaES SYSTEM
_0hYbN&
J
"I
Y
f
t
- - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
_
,
,.
p
@@20W N
r
d
,
- .
.
%
p
-'
' '
l
N~3%
N ! .$
\\
,
.
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
February 1,1988
OCAN028801
L. J. Callan, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Region IV
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, TX 76011
SUBJECT:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2
Docket Nos. 50-313/50-368
Followup to Response to
Inspection Raport 50-313/87-31; 50-368/87-31
l
Dear Mr. Calian:
Ouring the inspection conducted by Mr. R. A. Caldwell of your office during
the period September 21 - 25, 1987 (Inspection Report 50-313/87-31;
50-368/87-31), a violation was identified concerning a deficiency in the
E-field perimeter alarm system.
In response to this violation, Arkansas Power and Light stated that a proposed
modification was being tested and would be installed on the majority of the
E-field if determined to be satisfactory.
This modification did prove
adequate and has been installed where applicable.
!
However, certain sections of the E-field perimeter alarm system did not lend
l
themselves to this particular modification.
Arkansas Power and Light
initially proposed evaluating these sections on a case-by-case basis and
I
l
submitting to the NRC a schedule for the completion of modifications to these
'
sections.
However, it has been recognized that the approach to resolving
deficiencies with the perimeter security system has historically been on a
case-by-cas9 basis, dealing only with the specific problem that has been
!
identified. Therefore, rather than simply devising a fix for the immediate
l
problem with the E-field perimeter alarm system, Arkansas Power and Light
I
has chosen to take a more comprehensive approach to the entire perimeter
l
security system, which includes the intrusion detection system (E-field and
microwave), the surveillance equipment, and the physical barrier associated
with the perimeter.
The objective of this Perimeter Security System
Improvement Project is improvement of the system using a programmatic approach
q
instead of a problem-oriented approach,
yc-
%ap9y75?e.
dborem. ...,~
^
$'Y
- OCAN028801
February 1, 1988
Page 2
.
The first step towards accomplishing this objective will be the development
of a design basis for this portion of the security program.
This proposed
document will contain a compilation of the design criteria to be used for
the E-field, microweve, cameras, fence and certain special areas.
These
special areas include loading docks, major personnel entrances into the
plant, and vehicular entrance points.
It will also include major design
criteria on support systems for the above, for example, power distribution
systems and lighting levels in the isolation zone.
To aid in the
development of this basis, past inspection reports and reviews of other
utility programs will be used as well as internal and external security
,
experts.
Upon approval of the design basis, the next step will be to conduct a review
of the perimeter security system.
The existing systems will be compared to
the new design basis and deviations identified, grouped, and prioritized.
The resolution may include modifications and/or revision to the industrial
security plan. At this stage past problems will be factored in and resolved,
including the existing deficiency in the E-field perimeter alarm system.
After this review an action plan to accomplish the necessary modifications
will be developed.
Resolutions will be accomplished in a timely
manner consistent with their individual significance and complexity.
The following schedule has been developed for implementing this project:
Design Basis Document (Draft)
February 15, 1988
Approval of Design Basis
March 7, 1988
System Review
March 31, 1988
Action Plan Developed
April 18, 1988
Approval of Action Plan
June 2, 1988
The action plan and inplementation schedule will be provided for your
information by June 17, 1988.
Until the E-field perimeter alarm system deficiency is corrected for the
!
entire system, sections that are deficient will remain posted.
l
Very truly your
.
J mes M. Lev ne
xecutive Director
ANO Site Operations
DRH:JDJ:djm
-
i
cc:
AP&L Prompt Distribution
j
,
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
i
Document Control Desk
Washington, DC 20555
l