ML20147F102

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Value/Impact Assessment to Provide Guidance to Applicants in Meeting Minimum Requirements for Containment Isolation of Fluid Sys
ML20147F102
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/31/1978
From:
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
To:
Shared Package
ML20062F876 List:
References
REGGD-01.141, REGGD-1.141, NUDOCS 7812210321
Download: ML20147F102 (3)


Text

insda.w ')i O

VALUE/IMPACiSTATEMEf1T I.

The Proposed Action 1.

A.

Description - The proposed action will provide guidance to

/

applicants in meeting the miniinum requirements for containment isolation of fluid systems.

B.

fleed for the Proposed Action -

The SRP gives current staff 2

practices.

For this important t'opic, it would be desirable to

~

~

_s..

issue a regulatory guide in order to afford a wider public review of this topic.

A national concensus standard has been developed which could provide the technical basis for this guide.

e-

~

C.

Value/ Impact of the Proposed Action 1.

11RC operations

'Since th'e guide reflects current licensing

.,;z.,.

~..~. : ? -

practice, no impact on flRC operations is anticipated. _

  • ~

.)..

2.

Other Government Agencies - tiot Applicable.

" 'i ' '

t

~

l i

l 3.

Industry - Same as for 11RC operations.

l

+

4.

Public - tiot Applicable 781221 32/'

/

c j'

1

~

D.

Decisio,n"on the Proposed Action Guidance should be furn'ished on containment isolation of fluid Systems..

T Y *-l.,,... ej[. c.'V'"..

, - ~'

.. H' m : 1:::, h i ~ '. *. '.. '.

~*

1

,~

...i :.s ;....

.w r... :.. y.

.......m Technical Ap..........
~..
o.

II.

..... ~.. :w. n...

c proa,ch

...u Technical Alternatives....

2, a.

A.

Since the guide gives the current methods used to meet the y,..

i:

..~.:....

regulations, no techni. cal.. alternatives are now being considered.

j-t.

un...

.....a.

. 4 J

,1

+,,..

,.,v.,,.....

.s...-.... e

=-

....4

.2...

,. f.<,.....,

..s B.

Discussion.and Comparison of Technical Alternatives

7. y....

Not Applicable. ' - ' ". M ~t.. '.

{!

.s.,..:.,.....

l:

.. c

.a...

u,-

,.9'......,..,.

...?--

-t/

.?.,

lI l

~...

w..:.. m...

,1 C.

Discussion of Technical Aiproach l

..l i

e i... -

,..,'..t.,;.,..w.,w,

, s' '.

  • j

,e.

~. T' 5; Not Applicable

..aA%

4

=

(

.; c m.

.s.

..u.

...w.w,..u ;; y',c.a.

... a+..e.;.~

.~

... -.. ~..

1 x.

+

n t

I I I. P ro c e d u ral App r.,o a c,h.',., '.., '.. ;':'."; '. %;..... '

H l

_ %.. s.

.,... ~......

- 1

. +.,~:.,

p...,...,.

~. -

g

. ~.

..s A.

Procedural Alternatives

.;.a.

- ~.

s

..... c.

..(

Potential SD procedures that may be~ used to promulgate the m.,i 3'

.c

~

~ propose'd action and t'echnical approach include the following:

5 I

t

(

" Regulation. :

- ' Preparation or Revision of Reg. Guide

.i 1

ANSI Standard, endorsed by a Reg. Guide j

,.-f.'.

v'

=

~

[

NUREG Report "

.. c..

z.:;, f.

c m,

.a..

' n. '.y

~

}

Branch Position,

,.,c'....

m s

s.

4

-e-

,.c, r

j g

.ed...

  • r.

g j

n.

ll f,.,......,

r

.. W;' : *.

f.

2...-

i

)

c.:

l

~

..... s

c B.

Value/ Impact of Procedural Alternatives The endorsement of the~ standard is the most efficient alter-f native since it requires the least amount of time and effort to accomplish the task.

s t

e l

9 9

b 9

i l

4 e

l e

t 9

f f

e e

s 1

l s

s,

e b

4 9

er, t'

1 1

l

.t '.

, 4 1

.r, 9

s 08 e

=

t f,

s e

    • W 9

4 I

g M

e t

e 9

b 6

p q

f' v.

s,..

g' 3

.u s

t 9

8 9

.I

.s

- 4..*

,t g,

,,g,

+ -

    • J s

e p-

.s..