ML20147F102
| ML20147F102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/31/1978 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062F876 | List: |
| References | |
| REGGD-01.141, REGGD-1.141, NUDOCS 7812210321 | |
| Download: ML20147F102 (3) | |
Text
insda.w ')i O
VALUE/IMPACiSTATEMEf1T I.
The Proposed Action 1.
A.
Description - The proposed action will provide guidance to
/
applicants in meeting the miniinum requirements for containment isolation of fluid systems.
B.
fleed for the Proposed Action -
The SRP gives current staff 2
practices.
For this important t'opic, it would be desirable to
~
~
_s..
issue a regulatory guide in order to afford a wider public review of this topic.
A national concensus standard has been developed which could provide the technical basis for this guide.
e-
~
C.
Value/ Impact of the Proposed Action 1.
11RC operations
'Since th'e guide reflects current licensing
.,;z.,.
~..~. : ? -
practice, no impact on flRC operations is anticipated. _
- ~
.)..
2.
Other Government Agencies - tiot Applicable.
" 'i ' '
t
~
l i
l 3.
Industry - Same as for 11RC operations.
l
+
4.
Public - tiot Applicable 781221 32/'
/
c j'
1
- ~
D.
Decisio,n"on the Proposed Action Guidance should be furn'ished on containment isolation of fluid Systems..
T Y *-l.,,... ej[. c.'V'"..
, - ~'
.. H' m : 1:::, h i ~ '. *. '.. '.
~*
1
,~
...i :.s ;....
.w r... :.. y.
- .......m Technical Ap..........
- ~..
- o.
II.
..... ~.. :w. n...
c proa,ch
...u Technical Alternatives....
2, a.
A.
Since the guide gives the current methods used to meet the y,..
i:
..~.:....
regulations, no techni. cal.. alternatives are now being considered.
j-t.
un...
.....a.
. 4 J
,1
+,,..
,.,v.,,.....
.s...-.... e
=-
....4
.2...
,. f.<,.....,
..s B.
Discussion.and Comparison of Technical Alternatives
- 7. y....
Not Applicable. ' - ' ". M ~t.. '.
{!
.s.,..:.,.....
l:
.. c
.a...
u,-
,.9'......,..,.
...?--
-t/
.?.,
lI l
~...
w..:.. m...
,1 C.
Discussion of Technical Aiproach l
..l i
e i... -
,..,'..t.,;.,..w.,w,
, s' '.
- j
,e.
~. T' 5; Not Applicable
..aA%
4
=
(
.; c m.
.s.
..u.
...w.w,..u ;; y',c.a.
... a+..e.;.~
.~
... -.. ~..
1 x.
+
n t
I I I. P ro c e d u ral App r.,o a c,h.',., '.., '.. ;':'."; '. %;..... '
H l
_ %.. s.
.,... ~......
- 1
. +.,~:.,
- p...,...,.
~. -
g
. ~.
..s A.
Procedural Alternatives
.;.a.
- ~.
s
..... c.
..(
Potential SD procedures that may be~ used to promulgate the m.,i 3'
.c
~
~ propose'd action and t'echnical approach include the following:
5 I
t
(
" Regulation. :
- ' Preparation or Revision of Reg. Guide
.i 1
ANSI Standard, endorsed by a Reg. Guide j
,.-f.'.
v'
=
~
[
NUREG Report "
.. c..
z.:;, f.
c m,
.a..
' n. '.y
~
}
Branch Position,
,.,c'....
m s
s.
4
-e-
,.c, r
j g
.ed...
- r.
g j
n.
ll f,.,......,
r
.. W;' : *.
f.
2...-
i
)
c.:
l
~
..... s
c B.
Value/ Impact of Procedural Alternatives The endorsement of the~ standard is the most efficient alter-f native since it requires the least amount of time and effort to accomplish the task.
s t
e l
9 9
b 9
i l
4 e
l e
t 9
f f
e e
s 1
l s
s,
e b
4 9
er, t'
1 1
l
.t '.
, 4 1
.r, 9
s 08 e
=
t f,
s e
- W 9
4 I
g M
e t
e 9
b 6
p q
f' v.
s,..
g' 3
.u s
t 9
8 9
.I
.s
- 4..*
,t g,
,,g,
+ -
- J s
e p-
.s..