Forwards Value/Impact Assessment to Provide Guidance to Applicants in Meeting Minimum Requirements for Containment Isolation of Fluid SysML20147F102 |
Person / Time |
---|
Issue date: |
12/31/1978 |
---|
From: |
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20062F876 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
REGGD-01.141, REGGD-1.141, NUDOCS 7812210321 |
Download: ML20147F102 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:REGULATORY GUIDE VALUE/IMPACT ASSESSMENT
MONTHYEARML20126D4831980-04-0808 April 1980 Value/Impact Assessment of Proposed Reg Guide 1.144. Proposed Reg Guide Should Be Issued ML20147F1021978-12-31031 December 1978 Forwards Value/Impact Assessment to Provide Guidance to Applicants in Meeting Minimum Requirements for Containment Isolation of Fluid Sys ML20147C1071978-12-0808 December 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.141 ML20148S1841978-11-21021 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment Evaluates Need for Guidance on Health Physics Surveys During U-235 Processing & Fuel Fabrication.Recommends NRC Continue to Dev & Publish Guide in Timely Manner ML20148T8451978-11-14014 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Reg Guide 5.58.Reg Guide Will Provide Procedural Approaches for Maintaining Matls Control. Urges Development of Measurement Reference Matls W/Tolerence Guides Since Some Deviations Occur in Measurements ML20153A9711978-11-14014 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Reg Guide 5.58 on the Concept of Measurement Traceability.Concludes Small Resulting Addl Cost Is Worthwhile ML20148L6631978-11-0909 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment for Reg Guide 1.136,Matl for Concrete Containments,Concludes That Guide Should Be Prepared ML20148E1191978-10-0505 October 1978 Value/Impact Assessment for Proposed Reg Guide 1.130,Rev 1, Design Limits & Loading Combinations for Class 1 Plate-&- Shell Type Component Supports ML20150C3211978-09-0909 September 1978 Value/Impact Assessment on Safety-Related Permanent Dewatering Sys Concluding That Reg Guide Should Be Prepared. W/Att a Draft Staff Position ML20147E3931978-09-0505 September 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.28, QA Program Requirements (Design & Const). Impact on NRC & Applicants Minimal ML20147C8281978-07-0606 July 1978 Draft 1 of Value/Impact Assessment on Training in Radiation Protection for Personnel at Nuclear Power Plants. Recommends Preparation of Reg Guide on Radiation Protection ML20147E4021978-05-19019 May 1978 Preliminary Value/Impact Assessment on Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.28, QA Program Requirements (Design & Const). Rev Should Be Prepared ML20214R5041977-02-0202 February 1977 Value Impact Statement for Proposed Reg Guide 8.XX, Info Relevent to Assuring That Occupational Radiation Exposures at Medical Institutions Will Be Alara. No Adverse Impact of Guide on Any Medical Institutions Predicted 1980-04-08
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:TEXT-VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
MONTHYEARML20126D4831980-04-0808 April 1980 Value/Impact Assessment of Proposed Reg Guide 1.144. Proposed Reg Guide Should Be Issued ML20125D1891979-09-30030 September 1979 Value/Impact Assessment of Non-Destructive Testing Mgt Associates 780516 Request for Removal of App E Requirements Re QA Criteria for Shipping Packages for Radioactive Matl ML20147F1021978-12-31031 December 1978 Forwards Value/Impact Assessment to Provide Guidance to Applicants in Meeting Minimum Requirements for Containment Isolation of Fluid Sys ML20147C1071978-12-0808 December 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.141 ML20148S1841978-11-21021 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment Evaluates Need for Guidance on Health Physics Surveys During U-235 Processing & Fuel Fabrication.Recommends NRC Continue to Dev & Publish Guide in Timely Manner ML20148T8451978-11-14014 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Reg Guide 5.58.Reg Guide Will Provide Procedural Approaches for Maintaining Matls Control. Urges Development of Measurement Reference Matls W/Tolerence Guides Since Some Deviations Occur in Measurements ML20153A9711978-11-14014 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Reg Guide 5.58 on the Concept of Measurement Traceability.Concludes Small Resulting Addl Cost Is Worthwhile ML20148L6631978-11-0909 November 1978 Value/Impact Assessment for Reg Guide 1.136,Matl for Concrete Containments,Concludes That Guide Should Be Prepared ML20148E1191978-10-0505 October 1978 Value/Impact Assessment for Proposed Reg Guide 1.130,Rev 1, Design Limits & Loading Combinations for Class 1 Plate-&- Shell Type Component Supports ML20150C3211978-09-0909 September 1978 Value/Impact Assessment on Safety-Related Permanent Dewatering Sys Concluding That Reg Guide Should Be Prepared. W/Att a Draft Staff Position ML20147E3931978-09-0505 September 1978 Value/Impact Assessment of Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.28, QA Program Requirements (Design & Const). Impact on NRC & Applicants Minimal ML20147C8281978-07-0606 July 1978 Draft 1 of Value/Impact Assessment on Training in Radiation Protection for Personnel at Nuclear Power Plants. Recommends Preparation of Reg Guide on Radiation Protection ML20147E4021978-05-19019 May 1978 Preliminary Value/Impact Assessment on Rev 1 to Reg Guide 1.28, QA Program Requirements (Design & Const). Rev Should Be Prepared ML20214R5041977-02-0202 February 1977 Value Impact Statement for Proposed Reg Guide 8.XX, Info Relevent to Assuring That Occupational Radiation Exposures at Medical Institutions Will Be Alara. No Adverse Impact of Guide on Any Medical Institutions Predicted 1980-04-08
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
.
insda.w ')i O
' - VALUE/IMPACiSTATEMEf1T I. The Proposed Action 1. .
. A. Description - The proposed action will provide guidance to -
/ .
applicants in meeting the miniinum requirements for containment isolation of fluid systems. '
B. fleed for the Proposed Action - The SRP gives current staff
. 2 .
~
practices. For this important t'opic, it would be desirable to
~
_s.. .,, .
issue a regulatory guide in order to afford a wider public review of this topic. A national concensus standard has been developed which could provide the technical basis for this guide. - .
e-
~
C. Value/ Impact of the Proposed Action -
- 1. 11RC operations 'Since th'e guide reflects current licensing
.. .,;z .,. ~. .~. : ? - ,
practice, no impact on flRC operations is anticipated. _ '
.) ..
- 2. Other Government Agencies - tiot Applicable. " 'i ' '
t
~ '
. l
' i l
- 3. Industry - Same as for 11RC operations. .. l
+
- 4. Public - tiot Applicable
/ ".' -
.. c .
. j' .'
. . , 1 . .
- ~ -
D. Decisio,n"on the Proposed Action .
Guidance should be furn'ished on containment isolation of fluid . -
Systems.. * . . . H' '
. ,~
m : 1:::, h i ~ ' . * . '. . '. .
TY *-l. ,,. . . ej[., c.'V'"..
- ~' ,
~*
1
. .w ..
.. .i.. :.s ; .. . . .
r ..... : . . y. ..,.,.. .
- o.
- ~ .. .
- .......m Technical Ap. .. .
, , II. proa,ch .
.' c
- w . n . . .
...u .
. . .. . ~ . . 2 , a.
A. Technical Alternatives ..;. . .
Since the guide gives the current methods used to meet the
. . y, . . . .
i:
. ..~.: . . . .
- t. regulations, no techni. cal.. alternatives are now being considered. .
j-
, , , . . , . - . 4 ..
. " " '. . ....a.
,' ,1 -
... ,, J + , , . . ,
,.,v.,,.....
un.. ,.:.. , . .
....4 .s...- . .. . e
.. .. - < =-
.2 . . . . . . ' .
... . ..s .
,. f .< , . . . .... , . . .
B. Discussion.and Comparison of Technical Alternatives
. .. . .. 7. y . . .. .. ,
Not .s.
Applicable . ' - ' ". M ~t.. ' .
{!
- ,. .. .. c ..
,.9'..... . ...., . . . ;
.a . .. .. u,- ...?-- l: .
.?.,
-t/ . ,.
~ ... . .
lIl w . .:. . m. .. .
,1 C.
Discussion .,
of Technical..l Aiproach .
l e i. . . -
,e. . . . ',..,'..t.,;.,..w.,w, ., , , s' ' .
~ .;. T' c 5; Not Applicable ..aA% - .
=
( .
- m. .s.
..u.
4
.. .. . .~
..-. . - . . ~ . . . . . . . .w.w , ..u ..;;..y',c.a.
< . . . . - ... a+ .... ..e.;.~
1 n
x.- ..
+
t H '. -
l I I I . P. ~.ro. +c.,~:., e dg u, ral:p.App . . , . . . ,. r.,o _ %.. a s. c,h .' ,. ,., ~ '. . .., - . '. ~ .. ;':'."; . . .. . '. %; . . ... '
-1
..s . ..
Procedural Alternatives A. .., -
-~. .
s
. . . . .. c.
- ... . ... . . .;.a.
Potential SD procedures that may be~ used to promulgate the
..(
~
m .,i .
. . .:: . . .c . ~ .
3' propose'd action and t'echnical approach include the following: $. 5 I . : .. ," - . , -
. . . t
( . .- .. - . '
" Regulation . :
- ' Preparation or Revision of Reg. Guide
.i 1
ANSI Standard, endorsed by a Reg. Guide j v'
,.-f.'. .. .
~
=
z .:;, f .
NUREG Report " .
.. c .. .
[
~
c m, .a . . .
' n . '.y - . ..
-- .* }
Branch Position,
,.,c'....
m s
- s. *'
, , , . 4
-e- . .
,.c, ,'
r g j
.ed... *r. g .** .
,, , , j
., .,. n. . . - - .
r f ,. , . . . . . . ,
. .. ll
. . W;' : *.
i
.' . ., ....; f. 2...- -
. . _ .. c.:
)
. . . . ~ l
.. s ,
, c .: ,.
B. Value/ Impact of Procedural Alternatives The endorsement of the~ standard is the most efficient alter-
_ . ' , f native since it requires the least amount of time and effort to accomplish the task.
s t e
l 9 9
b 9 -
i l
4
- e l
" e t 9
f f
e ,
e 1
.
, s ,
e
, b 4
9 er, t'
, . 1 1
.t '.
,4 - l
.r, .
1
- 9 s
08 e
= . ..'
- t
', > s
.. e f,
- W 9 4 I g M t , e ,, , e p 9 b 6 . *
$ q
- - v. .
s,.. . . f'
, .u -.': .
s g' 3 . . ;
t * .
&' 9 8 9 .
,,g, + - **J . s ,, e p- .s..
,, , .