ML20147E120

Forwards 970130 Meeting Summary Requested by CP&L Re Brunswick self-assessment Prior to Cycle 14 Salp.List of Attendees & CP&L Handouts

ML20147E120
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	02/07/1997
From:	Shymlock M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Campbell W CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9702180202
Download: ML20147E120 (68)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. i February 7, 1997 1 Carolina Power & Light Company ATTN: Mr'. W. R.. Campbell Vice President i Brunswick" Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

SELF ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT i 0F LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT l UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50 325 AND 50-324 I

Dear Mr. Campbell:

This refers to a meeting requested by Carolina Power & Light Company on t .]anuary 30, 1997, in Atlanta, GeorJia. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the Brunswick self assessnent prior to the cycle 14 SALP. It is our J opinion, that this meeting was beneficial. ) l Enclosed is a List of Atter. dees and Carolina Power & Light Handout. The agenda included the Brunswick plant self assessment. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice, "Part 2, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures l will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us. j Sincerely, OriglaalsignedbyM.B.Shyndock i 4 Milton B. Shymlock, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50 324 License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR 62

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees 2. Carolina Power & Light Handout cc w/encls: (See page 2) 9702180202 970207 PDR ADOCK 05000324 0 PDR \\\\ J, c { Q - L M

= _. - - l l CP&L 2 cc w/encls: W. Levis, Director Site Operations Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 R. P. Lopriore Plant Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 J. Cowan, Vice President Operations & Environmental Support MS OHS 7 Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Gerald D. Hicks Manager - Regulatory Affairs Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 W. D. Johnson, Vice President and Senior Counsel Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environmental Health & Natural Resources P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 7687 Karen E. Long Assistant Attorney General State of North Carolina P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc w/encls cont'd - See page 3)

CP&L 3 (cc w/encls cont'd) Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff NCUC P. O. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626 0520 Public Service Commission State of South Carolina P. O. Box 11649 Columbia, SC 29211 Jerry W. Jones, Chairman Brunswick County Board of Commissioners l P. O. Box 249 Bolvia NC 28422 Dan E. Summers Emergency Management Coordinator New Hanover County Department of Emergency Management i P. O. Box 1525 Wilmington. NC 28402 William H. Crowe, Mayor City of Southport 201 East Moore Street Southport, NC 28461 Distribution w/encls: M. Shymlock, RII D. Trimble, NRR M. N. Miller. RII R. Aiello, RII J. Lenahan, RII W. Rankin, RII D. Thompson, RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8470 River Road, SE Southport, NC 28461 l OrFItr Rf f tstp l SIGNATURE d l NAME GMacDonald l DATE 02_/ M / 97 C2 / / 97 02 / / 97 02 / / 97 02 / / 97 02 / / 97 l COPY 7 (YES) NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO UttiLLM. KLLUMU LUPY UULUMLN1 NM:.. 6: \\CPLMIGb\\t RU5 ALP.5UM

ENCLOSURE 2 ) 4 4 I i j i I

1 i lll l l l l ,l 1 t n ano l Pi t r a at en e lc s u e N r 7

k. P 99 cP 1

iL 0 wA 3 L y s nS ra u e-u P n r r a C BP J

u --mA ,4Aa.,a4em am am J -m+m-a.A em a u 4 e- -k4ee,aoEs, nnm--,.s 14m.-s n,b.-s,A-A~4,,. .x.,-an-sa ,aA .Aa 2, ,,--meAm.,s a mu-ae,---e-mms-a-.s-4 m--4sMnaAwJKseA4-i 4 ( I f A 4 i j j a 1 t i i I i i &C C O i. "t3 O i BM . mumm i G G 6 y i mO Q,, l 3 Q. l V E8 ~ 1 5 O 0> u w G i .w -{ i

===mm E I

Agenda J e introduction Bill Campbell e Plant Overview Bill Levis i e Operations Bill Levis ~ e Maintenance Bill Levis l e Plant Support Bill Levis e Engineering Jeff Lyash i e Summary Bill Campbell

i' t Introduction 1 1 i i e Mission and Strategy l e Keys to Long Term Success 4 l i 'I a I - -e --m- -v v e.

SALP Period Accomplishments i o Overall Site Self Assessment and Oversight + Site Wide IPAP-Based Self Assessment + NAS + Improvements in Engineering and Self Assessment Culture + Outage improvements from Prior Lessons Learned + Vertical Slice Self Assessment i e Material Condition + Radwaste + Completion of Bulk Coatings Program

k 1 t t l SALP Period Accomplishments e Outage Performance 1 + ALARA + Quality + Duration e improvements in Engineering Product Quality --,<v ,e, e

SALP Period Accomplishments 4 e Higher Level of Confidence in NSSS Design Basis + 1TS / Power Uprate i + Continued Leadership / Involvement in Vessel I internals e Orgariizational Commitment and Resiliency Despite i a Challenging Year + 2 Refuelings \\ + 2 Hurricanes With Dual Unit Outages + Service Water Dual Unit Outage i i

1 SALP Period Accomplishments i e Demonstrated Emphasis on Conservative Decision Making + Control Room Response to Transients . Reactor Manual SCRAM on Circulating Water intake Pump Trip . Manual Turbine Trip on High Vibration j . Response to Recirculating Pump Trip and Runback + Safety Conscious Decision Making and Response to Emergent Issues . RHR Service Water Valve Failures . Service Water Pump Bolting l . SCRAM Solenoid Pilot Valve Sticking . Failed Fuel Suppression and Sipping . Response to Power Uprate issues . Hurricane Preparation and Response . Pressure Testing of Secondary Containment in Unit 1 Outage . Response to Refueling issues + Deferral of Engineering Downsizing

aA,,.__. .A,, __m 4._c. 4. A sa e,2,.a4_- Aaa s h,,-.en.4a .A h% ,,,e.. as,s.m,__ammaa mm.m.a..g;aum_m am p-m ,. -.s.a ha-m. a-4 i J l. 1 t I j i h l O C O l C .M I i 6 f= \\ C O. L, l O O e t +., l k m b e same l 4-8 >O E ew m,1 O i W t I b m .m s sume eamme CL mo i i I

WANO (INPO) Performance Indicator Index i Revised Index Unit 1 Unit 2 Value value 100 100 l 90 90 /> = f I 80 80 70 70 l 60 60 ] 50 50 40 40 30 i 30 941 942 943 944 951 952 953 954 961 962 963 964 941 942 943 944 951 952 953 954 961 962 963 964 Quarter Quarter Value WIue D Median Medan -.g +-

BNP Performance Indicators I Events 1 20 15 i i 10 l l 5 l l 0 ~ w e y x x w e y Y Y Y Q $ $w $e %y NNNNYYY j x w e Year / Quarter INPO Trend i 1

i LER Trend i Non-Voluntary i 60 i i 50 48-l l 40 38 l . ~ _.. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ 23 20 18 i 10 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 l r i i

r_ _ _ ___ _____ _ _________ _ _ _ i l ESF Actuations l l 35 31 l 30 25 i 20 17 j 15 14 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 l

Human Performance Events i 60 I 50 4s j 40 i i i 30 23 i 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 i

BNP Performance Indicators Events 20 15 10 5 ^ t i o, Y Q> Y Y $ %> $m #y NYYNN Y &y l A m V A A N m v A e \\ i Year / Quarter i 1 HP Ind 4 Qtr Avg INPO Trend L i

ll l l 1 t {i ll l i l !l!i li Is i l ll Ii ll li ll li ll d Ii 1 e 1 l 1 t li e l l a ll v li e i t ll L i ll li E n di i l ls l s li I l! t l li e r ll v o ll e li L p liii E e li li R li lili n li li o li i li t li i ii d mi i i no hi i C hi i ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 5 3 2 l jl { jLl l

Outage Performance Recent BNP Outage Comparisons 1994 Unit 2 1995 Unit i 1996 Unit 2 1996 Unit 1 B211R1 B110R1 B212R1 B111R1 TOTAL INJURIES 85 40 23 13 RADIATION EXPOSURE 564 REM 392 REM 295 REM 211 REM COMPLETION OF WORK SCOPE 97 96 % 99 % 99 % PERSONNEL CONTAMINATION 340 158 156 52 EVENTS l CONTAMINATED WASTE 900 805 525 275.2 GENERATION OUTAGE DURATION 96 50.7 40.9 33.6

l l i 1 l I t } } I f h O C I e O s .W a g O I L e l .t Q. O ,? .g 2 e C N 'e = .u ~ e El Q

Achievements Operations e Conduct of Operations ) + Transient Operations + Routine Operations 1 e Training improvements q + Simulator Use j i + Refocus on Basics j e Procedure Enhancements + Conduct of Operations Manual i + BOP Electrical Load List + PAR Backlog Reduction .--- -.- x. --,--w ,--w

Achievements i Operations e Progression Path for Operations Personnel ~ + Auxiliary Operators r + Shift Superintendent to Outage Unit i + Senior Reactor Operator to Power Uprate + Senior Reactor Operator to NAS + Six Individuals to Training e Radwaste Operations + Procedures i + Process j + Training l

d i nitiatives Operations t e Human Performance Emphasis + Team Training + Supervisory Skills Development T- + Training Focus 8 e improved Self-Assessment Quality 1 i + Correction of Cause, Not Symptom l + Communication of Analysis / Trend Reviews i e Work Control Process Focus l

Challenges Operations e Standard Technical Specification implementation t e Supervisory Development e Rotation of Operations Personnel to Other Plant Organizations i 1 i

4 s ---waa- --m_..-agm.h,+ eau..m.seAmu-mae mumes_m,e.a.a_m 4e aAwa a ww-..Aa-e-4.- -'esi.p+;- A A.-4--A.e. -.&-wa. e-.+ k i i ) i lt b i i j j l l ~... i i @C O 6 l O 1 i O O i C I C i O u M O \\ C +* I O i W u i (D Q i l i l

i l Achievements Maintenance i e Material and Equipment Condition + Unit Performance + Safety System Performance e On-Line Risk Management e FIN Teams e Contractor Controls o Preservation Program

Capacity Factor Unit 1/ Unit 2 Combined 100 I 90.05 80.69 81.53 i 60 40 - A 20 i Prior to 1993 1993 1994 1995 1996 J m

t OnFne Correct've Maintenance By Skill 1,000 3 J2 Mech & FIN J2 Elec ^ 800 5. J1 Mech & FIN ih r J1 Elect 1 h ilitJ \\ l 600 gj! !jk i Wl i !!h ^d l ll J% 400 f 4. j p y_ s.w.%g, [ , 2,14'i , w ,a a m wm n x i j l j ! u nt p i i n g~s h ;! l p! ~~ ts c 1 ~!.li! 5 8l!'I, A' i ~=3 j ~ ' ' T~ ? 200 ~' % :'m su=

==_eg%.m.. 3 _,p~e. e 0 338888888888888888888k waaaaaaawawaaaamaaawaw r e r r e e r e I I

i-a a N A c) co o N o o o o o o o t 9517 y j 9521 K 9525 O (O h i 9529 9533 h 9537 ~ 9541 E I 9545 U 9549 C 9601 I 3 i O 9605 i S O 9609

==== m N 9613 c+ x 9617 Q 9621 '"1 9625 9630 i 9634 { 9638 9642 l 9646 9650 9703 i I cc 2m i WW } "N l 1

1 o o o o o o o O Jun '95 Jul '95 D Aug '95

• 1 Sep '95 M

l M Oct '95 O Nov '95 "1 I l Dec '95 Jan '96 Feb '96 =g i Mar '96 M Apr '96 h May '96 9O Jun '96 g Jul '96 3 Aug '96 Q l Sep '96 N [ e l Oct '96 Nov '96 j Dec '96 EOE CCX l 55$ I -mg a f f

In.t. t.i iaives l Maintenance i i i I e Maintenance / Engineering Teamwork e Reliability (Risk Based) Maintenance i l e Cross Training 1 [ i ) l e i f r I

b Challenges Maintenance i t e Human Performance e Material Condition Improvements l r k i i f r i i t i

has+w. m.4:..,maam., e amm.eaear-.muw,aa a,m a e ..s4.4m as esmeu.4_ y,amg4as an,.ma,.,,um.au---a.m..s_,, 4 e 1 i 4 f 4 4 4 k a i i C i O l ._w l l O a C2. O e b u i Sm 4 u m b M f E Gw J U (g ~ In. i l 0 (I) Q 1 l l

Achievements Plant Support - E&RC e Water Chemistry e Effluent Reduction ~ l o Dose Reduction e Contamination Control t l i e Radwaste Shipping i i l e w-.-

Chemistry Performance Chemistry Performance Index 3 i 2.5 i 2 i l 4

n. 1.5 1.43 0.5 1994 1995 1996 E Unit 1 O Unit 2

Achievements Plant Support - E&RC l i i Liquid Effluent Released j 16 ' 3'7 14 m 12 c l

S 10 a

7.32 i (e) g c

S 6

= 4.44 l i AVERAGE 1994 1995 1996 E Gallons Released i

i i i f Achievements ? Plant Support - E&RC l .i Liquid Effluent Curies 2 l i i I 1.48 1.5 s i i i .e i c 1 l s 0.5 4'7 0.045 0.0376 0 AVERAGE 1994 1995 1996 E Curies Released

l Achievements 1 Plant Support - E&RC Outage Radiation Exposure 1 1 700 4 600 564 J 500 h 4 400 392 c $300 292 211 100 0-B211R1 B110R1 B121R1 B111R1 i i f

I Achievements l Plant Support - E&RC i On-line Radiation Exposure i 400 l 354 300 291 E i e 213 8 200 377 _ E E 100 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 (Proj.)

4 i I l l Achievements 4 1 l Plant Support - E&RC 1 Personnel Contaminations 700 1 600 587 4 i 539 500 a 400 I LU On 300 "9 i 236 200 100 0 AVERAGE 1994 1995 1996 Two Outages in 1996

Achievements Plant Support - E&RC o Radwaste Reduction + Focus On Waste Generation + 1nterim Low Level Storage Facility e Radwaste Shipping Program + 23 Spent Fuel Cask Shipments + 1409 Radwaste Shipments + Error Free

l l Achievements i Plant Support - E&RC i Cubic Feet of Radwaste Generated 120,000 i 'UU'UUU 100,000 80,000 78,137 .h 60,000 40,000 20,000 1994 1995 1996 ,-,.__m

initiatives i Plant Support - E&RC e Dose Control o Contamination Control l + Contaminated Floor Space + Leak Reduction Program i + Continue Emphasis on PCE Reduction e Human Performance + Procedure Use and Adherence l + Continue Worker Awareness and ARW Training Process l + Supervisory Development i i

Challenges Plant Support - E&RC i e Dose Reduction 1 o Contamination Control + Contaminated Floor Space + Plant Leaks i + Continue PCE Reduction Trend l e Human Performance i i i + Worker Performance and Awareness + Supervision of Critical Evolutions

_y Achievements t Plant Support - Emergency Preparedness i e Joint Information Center i e Strong Relationships with Offsite Authorities j i l e Severe Weather Workshop o Hurricane Response ~ i

l !:l!: , i (

!;i s

s e n d e e ra s p n e o rP p y s c e n R e g r r e e h m t E a e W s t r e o g p n e v p r .i i t u n e aS v .ia e i t t n r i a T S n P e e l I

F Achievements l l Plant Support - Security i e Equipment Reliability 1 t e Hand Geometry ~ e Vehicle Barrier = Y e improved Training l l e Security Computer i e Event Response I k

6 i nitiatDives G G 1 Plant Support - Security l e Single Point Access i i i e Access Authorization improvements ~ L i e FFD Improvements l I l 1 i e m. m.- m m e m

Achievements Nuclear Assessment Section (NAS) t e Lower Threshold for Problem identification l e More Depth to issues 4 e Assessor Rostions i I I i i i I I t 2

Achievements Nuclear Assessment Section (NAS) e Plant Improvements Resulting From NAS Issues + Improved Radwaste System Operation and Radiological i Controls + ESR Process improvements + Improved Control and Inventory of Sealed Radioactive Sources + Operations Special Assessment i

Challenges Nuclear Assessment Section (NAS) e Compliance vs Performance Based Assessments e Engineering Assessments t e Assessor Rotation

PES Sitewide Assessment 4 i t f e Team includes Eight Peer Assessors from Other Sites i i e Assess Against New INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria i e Review' Progress on "BNP Class improvement" and " Engineering improvement" Plans i

aan-p. ,A-,e a.,,-4a4m ,--4s I. i e 1 i i i ) i 4 2

k 4

4 l l 1 d i i i l i CD i O C i M C E G O C .C i O mu C 3.a -m c g en e c 7 til i a m i

1 Achievements t Engineering i e improved Engineering Product Quality i 4 + Engineering process improvement i + Strengthened Oversight and Accountability + Independent Product Quality Assessm,ent + Demonstrated improvement in Product Quality + Success in improving Equipment Performance l i I

1 i Achievements i Eng.ineering l Modification Quality Revisions / Modification Total Modifications 14 80 12 10' 60 8 40 6 i i 4 20 2 t E m O -o B211 B110 B212 B111 Refueling Outage i Revisions / Mod Modifications l

i Achievements Engineering e Safety Enhancement + Industry Leadership in the Vessel Internals Program j i + Increased Hydrogen Water Chemistry Performance + Effective Fuel Reliability Management + Resolved Double Disk Gate Valve LLRT Failures + Torus Preservation + Diesel Generator Service Water Piping Replacement i + Main Generator Disconnect Switch + Transmission System Reliability + Security Computer and Vehicle intrusion Barriers ) e Successful Maintenance Rule implementation 9 --n, -- v -

Achievements Engineering 1 i e Dose and Effluent Reduction + Radwaste Floor Drain Filter l ~ + Radwaste Sample Sink l + Option B Performance-Based LLRT + AOG Bypass Leakage Elimination e Plant Reliability + Low Pressure Turbine Rotor Replacement j + Main Turbine Partial Arc Admission + Condenser Air inleakage Reduction + Feedwater Heater Performance i i + EHC Reliability + Refueling Bridge Performance Upgrade j + Screen Wash System Performance i m

i Achievements Engineering e Resolving the Engineering Backlog + 1mproved Identification and Tracking + Real-Time Design Document Updates f + Rapid Response Team Effectiveness l i + Stronger Customer interface i

M Ek M kk l m ok i M6 m8 i ML M9 (/) M9 l M MV th Mc l LIJ mE l s M 96/L C MEk l O mkk MOk U M6 3 m8 h ML g M9 m9 cn MV .S .E lii me i X E -E 5 M 96/L E W 8 8 8 8 8, 8 m o_ a e r

l Backlog Reduction - Documents i Engineering ) 1,400 i i 1,200 i 1,000 d 800 600 400 0 M 1/96 2/96 3/96 4/96 5/96 6/96 7/96 8/96 9/96 10/96 11/96 12/96

5 Initiatives 1 Engineering 4 e Personnel Training and Qualification + Plant Engineer implementation + Strengthened ESP Training and Qualification Program + Recruiting for Needed Skills + Continuing Education Focus i I b b

I t initiatives Engineering e Self-Assessment Culture t e Engineering Design Basis Ownership + Power Uprate Evaluation + improved Technical Specifications Development + Setpoint Reconstitution + UFSAR Assessment + Safety System Functional Assessment Program e Reliability-Based Maintenance Program

Challenges Engineering e Continued Modification Quality improvement e Strengthening Engineering Technical Programs l e Proactive Support for improving Equipment i Performance i I eimproving Corrective Action Consistency l l l e Managing Design Basis Verification Efforts

i 6 i { 5 B d i l i } I lj i 5 i i M l E e i C V O m --m l Em W l gA b W .O 1 3 1Ee o O (13 i C O> O e 4 _~ EM gm 4 4 j l l

I 1 BNP Performance Overview - 1996 i j Green - Represented significant continuous improvement, world class performance, or met internal perfo Tnance targets. ) W < - Improved or maintain previous performance but did not meet intemal performance targets i j Red - Represents a decline from previous Brunswick perfonnance. 1 SAFETY RELIABILITY ENVIRO N M ENTAL OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL NSOEX i PERFORMA88CE j NUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENTS ON LME CM [ j UNIT 1 - UNIT 2 j i, I i i l. I - uM'T 1 - ' UNIT 2 i i

BNP Performance Overview - 1996 i Green - Represented significant continuous improvement, world class perfonnance, or sw internal performance targets. Yc!!c. - Improved or maintain previous performance but did not meet internal performance targets I Red - Represents a decline from previous Brunswick performance. l 't SAFETY R ELIABILITY ENVIRON M ENTA L OTHER l M. ^ m- ~ I l a l + i ?

Conclusion i l i e Brunswick is Fundamentally Stronger in Most Areas Than in Previous SALP Period - Continuous improvement l + Safety Performance l l l e Regulatory Compliance Trend - Underlying issues j +1mprove C.onsistency of Corrective Action Effectiveness +1mprove Administrative Controls and Programs + Improve Adherence to Administrative Controls and Programs l + Continued Focus on Human Performance Standards and Accountability j e Remainirq 3arriers to " Industry Best" Performance + Improve Effectiveness of Engineering - Significant Progress Has Been Made j i + Reduce Personnel Exposure j 1 s .- - = - -}}