ML20147D218
| ML20147D218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/04/1978 |
| From: | Stephens R, Sutton J, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147D159 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900105 NUDOCS 7810130265 | |
| Download: ML20147D218 (8) | |
Text
'O VEND 0R INSPECTION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
99900105/78-01 Program No. 44060 Company:
Fisher Controls Company Marshalltown Division Inspection Conducted: June 5-9, 1978 Inspector:
.M 4 ail f-J-Y J( W. Sutton, Contractor Inspector, Vendor Date Inspection Branch Observer:
.M M
7'3-M y Stevens, Mechpical Engineer (NRR) NRC Approv [
/e A8M 6 -S-76 D. E. Whitesell, Chief, ComponentsSection I Date Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on June 5-9,1978(99900105/78-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and applicable '
codes and standards including; close out previous inspection findings, QA program review testing and inspection, and training and indoctrination.
The inspection involved twenty-six (26) Inspector-hours on site by the NRC inspector.
Results:
In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviation or unresolved items were identified in three (3) areas.
The following was identified in the remaining area.
I
"/ $ lO1309-
. Deviations: Testing and Inspection - the appropriate drawing revision used for receiving parts was not being identified on the inspection report.
Unresolved Items:
None.
l t
s I
t I
l-l t '
't 4
'i l
1'
. DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted Fisher Controls Company (FCC)
/
- D. Blanchard, Vice President, Manufacturing
- J. Coulter, Manager Customer Service
- R. Duke, Manager QA
- F. Hudson, QA Supervisor
- M. Brauns, QA Engineer Supervisor
- C. Kothenbeutel, Supervisor LSC Contracts.
- R. Garbe, QA Engineer M. Heil, QA Engineer K. Gould, Gage Foreman L. Johnson, Weld Shop Inspection D. Wilkening, Floor Inspector V. Hinshaw, Floor Inspector L. Wharff, Inspector B. Forbes, Inspector L. Schwienebart, Inspector B. Shiek, Inspection Foreman M. Case, Group Leader Inspection W. Woodworth, Inspector
- Denotes the individuals that attended the exit interview (Part F).
Hartford Steam Boiler Co. (HSB)
T. Scott, Authorized Nuclear Inspector.
B.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings l
l 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01) Measuring equipment not calibrated to national standards, individually owned gages not identified as required.
The inspector verified by random inspection of individually owned tools and gages that they are now identified with a serial number.
It was further verified by review of audits, that the Fisher Manufacturing procedure, 2H2, Revision 4, Paragraph 4.2.2, tiearly states calibration requirements and audits have been perfonned to document cornctive action implementation.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 77-01) Drawing Revisions on the machine routing sheets were not current.
The inspector ef verified by a random review of shop pack for NHS 149 that the 4
machine routing sheets identified the correct drawing revision.
~
y s
____m._
l l
1 l
1 l
-4_
C.
QA Manual Review 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the QA program has been documented in writing, and has been implemented to control quality related activities and that this program meets Code, regulatory and contract require-ments.
Also to ascertain that the program provides for the following:
y[-
a.
A management policy statement concerning QA.
b.
The QA organization structured to achieve organizational independence and freedom to:
(1)
Identify quality problems.
(2)
Initiate appropriate resolutions.
(3) Verify corrective actions.
c.
The QA staff with the authority, and access to a level of management that ensures effective implementation of the QA program elements, and to enforce positive and timely corrective action.
d.
The duties, responsibilities, and the authority of the QA staff are clearly delineated in writing.
e.
That detailed written procedures, properly reviewed and approved, are used to control quality activities.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accpeted QA Manual dated June 15, 1977, Section 2, to verify that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and other applicable codes and standards.
b.
Review of the General Company Policy and Authority Statement, dated June 15, 1977, and Sections 2 and 3 to verify that the responsibility and authority of personnel involved in quality assurance / quality control are clearly established and delineated in writing.
. c.
A General review of Sections 4 thru 19 to verify that the quality assurance program provides coverage for:
(1)
Fabrication, procurement, design and testing.
(2) Measures exist to assure that activities affecting quality are covered by documental descriptions and instuctions.
(3) A system exists to control nonconforming items.
(4)
Prompt identification and corrective action.
(5) A system for documented planning of Quality Assurance Audits.
d.
Review of selected Quality Assurance / Quality Control Procedures (QAP/QCP) to verify that detailed procedures are properly reviewed, approved and used to control quality activities.
e.
Review of Audit procedures and schedules.
f.
Interviewed personnel to verify that they were knowledgeable in applicable procedures for implementation of the Quality Assurance Program.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
D.
Testing and Inspection 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
(a)
In-Process and final examinations and tests are performed in accordance with documented instructions, procedures and drawings, by persons other than those who perform the activity being examined.
~
- (b) Checklists are used which include the document number and revision to which the examination or test is per-formed and the results of examination and tests are recorded in the spaces provided on the checklist.
(c) The signature, initials, or stamp and date of the manu-facturers representative and the Authorized Inspector are entered in the spaces provided on the checklists for activities they witnessed, including Mandatory Hold Points, beyond which work cannot proceed without their consent.
(d) The procedures which are used contain as reference requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design drawings.
(e) The procedures used include provisions for assuring that prerequisites for the given tests have been met.
(f) The test results are documented.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME Accepted QA Manual, Sections 11 and 12, dated June 15, 1977, to verify that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and other applicable
- codes, b.
Review of Administrative Practice Bulletins, 07-15, 07-16, 07-20 and manufacturing procedures FMP-2A2.3 to verify that inspection and tests are performed using documented approved procedures.
c.
Review of Rough Stock Inspection reports and machine routing sheets for Shop orders XB5649, X56596, XD3360, XB4498 and XC0036 to verify that the documents contain I
or reference the requirements and acceptance limits.
1 d.
Review of the following in-process and inspection & test documents, valve serial #5698456, weld order PE5713-1-2-3, assembly test reports NHS-182. and NHS 74, machine routing sheet NHS-164, to verify that the documents had been signed by authorized personnel.
. e.
Review of test report for valve #5693456 to verify that test results are properly documented.
f.
Discussion with cognizant shop personnel.
3.
Findings a.
Deviations See Enclosure, b.
Unresolved item None.
E.
Training and Indoctrination 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the following items were implemented and controlled in accordance with applicable NRC and ASME Code requirements, and:
a.
To ascertain that procedures have been prepared and approved by the company to prescribe a system for personnel training activities which is consistent with the commitments of the QA Program.
b.
To determine that the procedures for training activities are being properly and effectivly implemented by the company.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the QA manual, Section 2, subparagraph 2.10, titled " Training" to verify that the QA Program provides for the training and indoctrination of personnel performing quality activities.
I b.
Review of procedures FMP 2K19, 2K17, and 251 to verify that procedures for training and indoctrination have been properly reviewed, approved, released, and controlled as prescribed in the program.
.. c.
Review of the QA Training Schedule and review of the list of personnel, to verify if the training schedules / procedures are being implemented.
d.
Review of the qualification records of QA personnel for training in auditing, QA procedures and NDE methods, to verify that the program for training and qualifying personnel is being implemented.
e.
Review of QA' Training records of selected departments engaged in quality related work to verify if the training program is being documented a'id maintained.
f.
Discussion with cognizant personnel, to verify that they understand the implementing. procedures and the importance of properly qualified and trained personnel.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
F.
Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in l
Paragraph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on June 8,1978.
The management representative acknowledged the statements by the inspector concerning the deviation that was identified during this inspection.
The inspector also reiterated the format to be l
used by the company when responding to inspection findings which requires corrective action to be initiated.
~^
__