ML20147D025
| ML20147D025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/21/1986 |
| From: | Mark Miller NRC |
| To: | Zech NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147C966 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-744 NUDOCS 8801200036 | |
| Download: ML20147D025 (19) | |
Text
'
' ' ' i '. :
,, ;.. ;l-da..-
- ~
> 3y.
W^
UNITED STATES j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! ',?
WASHINGTON, D. C. 30006
\\"-
~
fo I &
ii 2 0FFKEOFINE CHAIRMAN g
g g
);
., 9 g p % lt.A-i-
.l '
4 *d so h
[
14, g,7,
.s.. : (' i.
/
- p. ;. ;.. ;..
... re.,'
o k
l 4
I.
.y.
(%
,)
,.f mg sorr &
cra o
. l
(
J 8801200036 880113 PDR FOIA CONNOR87-744 PDR e
b f
1
AgM4 N
Y Suimary on Piping Issues at Sequoyah There are two piping issues at Sequoyah. The first is a small piece of the larger issue of material traceability.
Issue 1 Abercrombie, the TVA Sequoyah Site Direew, issued a Stop Work Order on Class A and B pipe work at Sequoyah in early October 1986 which is still in effect. The Stop Work Order was issued as a precautionary measure related to the lack of appropriate QA documentation which surfaced as a material traceability issue. TVA decided to hold off on the work via the Order until documentation is in ordct rather than have to do rework if traceability of material is not established. This order does not affect a large portion of work.
Issue 2 Deficiencies in Sequoyah's piping and pining support design criteria surfaced criteria for affected piping (primarily 6" or less in size) proposed interim in the susmer of 1986. As a solution for restart. TVA has and pipe supports at Sequoyah. During the week of October 6, the NRR staff and its consultant, Brookhaven National Laboratory, perfomed an audit of the alternately analyzed piping and supports at Sequoyah. The audit included a review of the Restart Program and Interim Criteria, an evaluation of selected design packages, discussions with TVA staff, and a walkdown of installed piping and supports.
Audit results are as follows:
The scope of the Restart Program appears acceptable to the NRC staff if all piping required for restart that have a maximum operating tempera-ture exceeding 200*F have included themal expansion in the analysis.
TVA agreed to expand the program scope to consider this.
Regarding Interim Criteria for piping, TVA agreed to withdraw two of the three requested exceptions. Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) loads will be included in the evaluations and appropriate stress intens-ification factors and Code allowables will be used. However, the exception which requests separate evaluation of seismic and thermal anchor movement remsins open. A staff position is being developed.
Regarding Interit Criteria for pipe supports. TVA agreed to withdraw three of the four requested exceptions. Supports will be designed to confom with Standard Review Plan allowables and FSAR rigidity require-ments, including appropriate load rating and spring variability. On the remaining exception, the staff agrees with TVA that OBE loads and ArI7
2-3 piping thermal growth-induced friction loads may be excluded from the Restart Program. This is acceptable because the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (not OBE) is the controlling load in support design and the effects of friction loads are generally insignificant to supports of small bore piping.
TVA agreed to use a safety factor of 2.5 for wedged anchor bolts and 2.8 for self-drilling anchor bolts rather than their originally proposed factor of 2.0 for the Restart Program, and will comply with staff requirements for the long-term operation. The staff agreed with TVA's position.
No apparent deficiencies were observed in the design package review and walkdown.
As a result of the audit, the staff believes that this isste is very nearly resolved and is not seen as a critical path item for Sequoyah restart.
t l
l l
l l
l
k'?
C I
4, i
i t. : c.r.'m 1'..,
AGENDA FOR TVA STATUS BRIEFING BY NRC STAFF ON 10-16-86 SKED FOR 9: 30-11:00 TIME TOPIC SPEAKER c.
-r
- - r+
r 6
r-
- r.-.
- ;c
,4
.s.'
,,.2 4. _ _,
E;;r :
se, C 2
/ -
,,. p,., ;
,c... g
- c. e
.. a 7r ne n n LLuslNG REMARLS FOR OFEN MEETING EdGIN CLOSED MEETING WITH OI
- ;r ;r i,
-l.
,.c---.-
t
.s s
- e
~.
a.*
- 1 t
January ig 198{
SUMMARY
OF JAN 12. 1997 OPEN MEETING IN BETHESDA BETWEEN tytc SENIOR MANAGEPENT TEAM AND TVA OVERVIEW COMMENTS 1.
THIS MEETING WAS UNDERWHELMING AND ALMOST COMPLETELY UNEVENTFUL.
a.
MANY INDIVIDUALS THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE AN OPEN DIECUSSION OF THE ISSUES WITH TVA IN ORDER TO PREVENT FUTHER DELAYS AND TO GET ON WITH RESOLVING TVA'S PROBLEMS.
b.
INSTEAD, THE OBJECTIVE OF THE MEETING WAS TO BRING TO LIGHT THAT THE NRC AND TVA HAVE HAD COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS.
NRC GAVE SOME EXAMPLES OF THESE COhMUNICATION PROBLEMS, TVA AGREED THEY HAVE TO DO BETTER, THE NRC SAID THE SAME, AND THE MEETING WAS OVER.
2.
NRC PERSONNEL PRESENT Stello Denton Taylor G.
Zech Hayes Thompson plus a host of other technical people 3.
TVA PERSONNEL AT THE TABLE White C. Dean C.
Waters Willis
(
Cattle, Mason & others sitting in background 4.
BIGGEST ITEM OF INTEREST WAS A JAN 11 LETTER FROM WHITE TO STELLO DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING.
LETTER IS WHITE'S VIEW OF WHAT HIS MARCH 20th DA RESPONSE LETTER WAS ALL ABOUT.
LZ SHOULD READ.
ATTACHED.
SPECIFIC
SUMMARY
POINTS 1.
WHITE ASKED STELLO FOR "a meeting between NRC and TVA in a
locked room where no one comes out until everyone understands the issues and determines and resolves the corrective actions for the communication problems". Cparapheased3 STELLO AGREED TO DO.
2.
JIM TAYLOR AND THE ETELLO SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME l
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE MEANING OF "PERVASIVE" AND "SIGNIFICANT".
THEY AVOIDED DEFINING PERVASIVE EXCEPT TO SAY IT IMPLIES a.
l AN ENT!RE PROGRAM IS UNSAT.
b.
THEY SAID THE NRC CAN CALL QUT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES BECAUSE IT FOCUSES ON A
SPECIFIC AREAS SUCH AS STRUCTURAL WELDING.
f 3.
SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM STATED MOST PROBLEMS APPEAR TO BE WITH WATTS BAR ISSUES.
k
~
4 TAYLOR GAVE CREDIT FOR THINGS TVA HAS DONE WELL AND CORRECTLY.
1
.. +
\\
(
January 141958 5.
TAYLOR GAVE CXAMPLES OF OTHER PLANTS THE NRC HAS CALLED OUT l
SPECIFIC SIGNIFICANr QA DEFICIENCIES IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE THAT TVA IS NOT UNIQUE NOR I3 THE NRC INEXPERIENCED IN DEALING WITH THESE TYPES OF ISSUES.
6.
DENTON GAVE THE "SUITABILITY FOR SERVICE" CONCEPT AND THE "ANALYZE AWAY VICE FIX THE PROBLEM" APPROACH AS EXAMPLES OF AREAS NEEDING WORK. Cparaphrased]
7.
WILLIS COULD NOT UNDERSTAND HOW COMMUNICATIONS C"SO S!MPLC A
PROBLEM"3 COULD GROW TO SUCH PROPORTIONS. NONETHELESS, NOW THAT IT
- HAS, HE WILL GET IT FIXED. ALSO INDICATED THAT WHITE HAS BEEN GIVEN THE RESOURCES HE NEEDS TO GET THE JOB DONE.
8.
WATERS INDICATED THAT TVA HAS HIRED BACK WHITE BECAUSE THE BOARD FELT HE WAS NEEDED FOR TVA AND FOR THE RATEPAYERS.
9.
DEAN MADE A SIMPLE STATEMENT INDICATING THE BOARD EXPECTS TO BE INFORMED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY PROBLEMS IN THE TVA NUCLEAR PROGRAM AND ALSO THE NRC SHOULD BE TOLD AS SOON AS TVA KNOsS.
10.
STELLO INDICATED WHITE'S RECENT LETTERS CLEARS THE AIR dh!T, BUT IT STILL RAISED EOME QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS.
- 11. STELLO ALSO EXPRESSED CONCERN WITH THE TIME IT HAS BEEN TAKING TO GET TVA AND NRC SEE!NG EYE TO EYE.
FOR EXAMPLE, IT HAS TAKEN f
OVER 7
MONTHS FOR TVA TO AGREE THAT STRUCTURAL WELDING IS A
PROBLEM AREA.
i 12.
WHITF. COMMITTED THAT WITHIN 90 DAYS, HE Wit.L SUBMIT TO NRC A DOCUMENT GIVING A LIST OF ALL WATTS BAR PROBLEMS AND SCHEDULES ON THEIR RFSQLUTION.
a.
DENTON QUESTIONED HOW WHITE COULD DO THIS BEFORE THE EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM WAS COMPLETED.
13.
HENRY MEYERS ASKED OUESTIONS AT THE MEETING.
HE TRIED TO P!N DOWN WHITE AND TVA DN WHETHER TVA NOW FELT THAT TVA MET APPENDIX B REQUIREMENTS ON MARCH 20th?
HE ALSO ASKED THE SAME QUESTION EXEMPT!NG STRUCTURAL WELDING AND ASME CODE SECTION III RADIOGRAPHS FROM THE ANSWER.
TVA AND WHITE REMAINED SILENT AND REFUSTED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION.
l l
14.
PERSONS FROM STOCKTON'S STAFF AND OTHEP ENERGY COMMITTEE STAFFERS WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ALw LEFT UNIMPRESSED WITH THE MEETING Cmy perception].
I I
i t
h I
1
~
A g
~
TVA SENISR MANAGEMENT TEAN REVIEW MEETING 1/6/86 Proposed Agenda 1.
Comission Briefing 1/7/86' Backup Slides 2.
Weld Issues Watts Bar Welding Meeting)of 1/7/86 and Applicability to Sequoyah (B. D. Liaw Use of Region I Van at Sequoyah 3.
tTC and Employee Concerns Status of Franklin Effect (B. J. Youngblood) 4.
Sequoyah Status H. Thompson Site Visit of 1/2 - 1/3/86 (H. Thompson, Jr.)
EQ Audit / Inspection - SCR & New Containment Temperature / Pressure Profile 5.
NRC Staffing
- Short Tenn/Long Term
t.
s s,'
,s
\\
i STAFF BRIEFING TVA NUCLEAR PLANTS JUNE 6, 1986
T
,a INTRODUCTION 0
STATUS OF STAFF ACTIONS REGARDING TVA FACILITIES IN SECY-86-1C, PROVIDED TO THE COMMISSION MAY 14, 1986 O
FOCUS OF THIS BRIEFING IS PRIMARILY ON:
i CORPORATE NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE PLAN TVA AND STAFF ACTIVITIES AT SEQUOYAH AND WATTS BAR STATUS OF STAFF REVIEW 0F INTIMIDATION AND HARASSMENT 0
SEVERAL NEW ISSUES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED SINCE LAST BRIEFING l
l l
0 SCHEDULES STILL BASED ON STAFF ESTIMATES l
0 C0liPLETION TARGETS HAVE BEEN REVISED DUE T0:
DELAY IN SUBM:TTALS FROM TVA l
TVA ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ONSITE ACTIVITIES SLOWER THAN WAS EXPECTED l
2
}
NRC 50,54(F) LETTER RF0VIREMENTS IN CORPORATE AREA 0
SPECIFY ACTIONS BY TVA BOARD TO REMAIN INFORMED AND INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR PLANT PERFORMANCE O
DESCRIBE MANAGEMENT CHANGES TO STRENGTHEN REGULATORY PERFORMANCE 0
ESTABLISH CORPORATE CONTROLS TO ASSURE AN INTEGRATED COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM l'
0 IMPROVE PROGRAM'FQR ESCALATING QA AUDIT FINDINGS 3
i REVISED CORPORATE PLAN (MARCH 10, 1986)
BOARD ACTIONS 0
BOARD TO REMAIN INFORMED OF NUCLEAR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 0
IMPROVED CORPORATE OVERSIGHT MANAGEMENT CHANGES 0
ESTABLISH MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER AS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENTIRE' NUCLEAR PROGRAM r
0 REORGANIZE NUCLEAR PROGRAM TO ESTABLISH STRONG CENTRAL ORGANIZATION WITH COMPLETE AUTHORITY OVER ALL NUCLEAR MATTERS 0
REDUCE LOCAL AUT0NOMY OF INDIVIDUAL SITES 0
MAJOR INFUSION OF OUTSIDE MANAGERIAL AND TECHNICAL TALENT IN LINE POSITIONS OF NEW ORGANIZATION 0
DEVELOP IN-HOUSE MANAGERIAL TALENT TO EVENTUALLY ASSUME CONTROL OF PROGRAM 0
NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW STAFF (NSRS) CHANGED TO NUCLEAR MANAGER'S REVIEW GROUP (NMRG) - TO BE USED TO SUPPORT MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER COMMITMENT TRACKING AND QA 0
INTEGRATED COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM AND PROGRAM FOR ESCALATING QA AUDIT FINDINGS REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 4
,u STAFF EVALUATION OF REVISED _ CORPORATE PLAN 0
TVA SU5MITTAL PROVIDES A CINCEPTUAL DESCRIPT!CN OF CHANGES ANP TVA INTENT, BUT LACKS IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS 0
PLAN'S CONCEPT ACCEPTABLE BUT STAFF COULD NOT MAKE FINAL FINDING WITHOUT THE DETAILS OF IMPLEMENTATION 0
RESULTS Cr PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW FORWARDED TO COMMISSION ON.
MAY 9, 1986 i
0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM TVA RE0 VESTED MAY l, 1986 e
0 STAFF CONCERNS AND' NEEDS INCLUDED:
DETAILS OF STAFFING, INTERFACE PROCEDURES, AND OPERABILITY OF 0FFICE OF NUCLEAR POWER REVISED QA TOPICAL REPORT DETAILS OF ENGINEERING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES O~ TVA SUBMITTED REVISED QA TOPICAL REPORT ON MAY 1, 1986 AND IS PREPARING RESPONSE TO OTHER STAFF CONCERNS QA TOPICAL REFORT UNDER STAFF REVIEW 0
STAFF WILL lhSPECT IMPLEFFNTATION OF PLAN 5
SEQUOYAH O
RESTART AT LEAST SEVERAL MONTHS AWAY 0
TVA SUBMITTAL OF REVISED NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE PLAN NOT EXPECTED BEFORE LATE JUNE O
EQUIPMENT QUAliFICAT!ON (LEAD RESPONSIBILITY - IE)
TVA PROGRAM ACCEPTED BY STAFF TVA COMPLETED ALL 96 EQ DOCUMENT PACKAGES AND IS MAKING HARDWARE MODIFICATIONS l
TVA EQ CERTIFICATION SUBMITTAL NOT EXPECTED BEFORE LATE JUNE RECENT ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY TVA MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL l
STAFF HAS INSPECTED 77 EQ PACKAGES: ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS ARE PLANNED FOR LATE JUNE TVA HAS NOT COMPLETED EVALUATION OF NEW POSTULATED HIGH ENERGY llNE BREAK EFFECTS ON E0 l
WELDif4G (LEAD RESPONSIBILITY - NRR) 0 TVA PROGRAM ACCEPTED BY STAFF -
TVA WELD REINSPECTION REPORT UNDER STAFF / CONSULTANT REVIEW C
TVA ADDRES$1NG WELD DISCREPANCIES ADDITIONAL STAFF INSPECTIONS IN JUNE 1986 POTENTIAL EMP.i.0YEE CCNCERN9 INVOLVING WELDING MAY BE IDENTIFIED 6
"~
SEQUOYAH (CONTINUED)
- 0 DESIGN CONTROL (LEAD RESPONSIBILITY - lei
- TVA PROGRAM NOT YET SUBMITTED FOR STAFF REVIEW
- DESIGN DISCREPANCIES IDENTIFIED BY GILBERT / COMMONWEALTH AND TVA, AND CONFIRMED BY IE
- EXAMPLES INVOLVE CALCULATION DEFICIENCIES, DESIGN CHANGE CON, TROL, AND ADHERANCE TO SEISMIC REQUIREMENTS i
- TVA RESPONSE TO STAFF QUESTIONS REGARDING DESIGN CONiROL EXPECTED IN EARLY JUNE
-TVADEVELOPINGMAJORDESIGNBASELINEANDVERIFICATION PROGRAM, TO BE INCLUDED IN REVISION TO NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE PLAN.
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION INDICATES IT WILL:
A.
VERIFY ADEQUACY OF MODIFICATIONS SINCE OL FOR ACCIDENT MITIGATION AND SAFE (HOT) SHl!TDOWN SYSTEMS (ALL OR PART OF 34 SYSTEMS)
B, DOCUMENT ENGINEERING RATIONALE OF ALL DEFICIENCIES FOR THESE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO RESTART C.
COMPLETE REVISED CALCULATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE SYSTEMS AFTER RESTART.
EXTEND REVIEW TO ALL SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS
- SUBSTANTIAL STAFF REVIEW AND INSPECTION OF THIS AREA IS EXPECTED
- MAY BE PACING ITEM FOR SEQUOYAH I!ESTART 7
4 SEQUOYAH (CONTINUED) G 0
EMPLOYEE CONCERNS (LEAD RESPONSIBILIfY - NRR)
- TVA HAS CHANGED FROM QTC PROGRAM TO TVA PRN. DAM
- TVA MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER AND INSPE: TOR GENERAL MET WITH SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM ON MAY 12, 1986
- TVA APPROACH GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE BUT PROGRAM DETAILS UNDER STAFF REVIEW
- TVA HAS ABOUT 700 EMPLOYEE CONCERNS WHICH APPLY TO SEQUOYAH
- STAFF CONCERNS WITH TVA PROGRAM INCLUDED:
- FAILURE TO EVALUATE GENERIC CONCERNS ADEQUATELY l
- LACK OF DOCUMENTATION
- ADEQUACY OF SAFETY-RELATED DETERMINATIONS
- ADDITIONAL STAFF INSPECTIONS PLANNED IN JllNE-JULY 1986 1
0 OPERATIONAL READINESS (LEAD RESPONSIBILITY - REGION II)
- ONG0ING OPERATIONAL READINESS INSPECTIONS HAVE IDENTIFIED l
DISCREPANCIES REQUIRING RESOLUTION BEFORE RESTART
- EXAMPLES INVOLVE SURVEILLANCE DEFICTENCIES. PROCEDijRE WEAKNESSES, MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROBLEMS # ' AD10 LOGICAL CONTROL DEFICIENCIES 1
- OPERATOR TRAINING AND OllALIFICATION IS ADEQUATE
- ADDITIONAL INSPECTION PLANNED OF MAINTENANCE, SURVEILLANCE l
HEALTH PHYSICS, AND OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES 8
q e
CONCLUSIONS 0
TVA CONTINUING TO RECEIVE HI3H PRIORITY BY NRC STAFF c
0 EXTENSIVE INVOLVEMENT BY SENIOR NRC MANAGEMENT TEAM AND GOOD COMMUdICATIONS AT ALL LEVELS BETWEEN STAFF AND TVA t
0 RESOLUTION OF DESIGN CONTROL ISSUES EXPECTED TO BE PACING t
ITEM FOR SFOUOYAh 0
RESOLUT!ON OF DESIGN CONTROL AND EMPLOVEE~ CONCERNS ISSUES EXPECTED TO BE PACING ITEMS FOR WATTS BAR 0
RESOLUTION OF DESIGN CONTROL, OPERATIONAL READINESS, FIRE PROTECTION AND EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ISSUES EXPECTETs TO BE PACING ITEMS AT BROWNS FERRY 0
TVA STILL EVALUATING SCOPE OF THFTR EFFORT AND NO SCHEDULES AVAILABLE C
0 TVA EFFORT WILL CONTINUE TO IMPACT NON-TVA STAFF ACTIVITIES 16
~
AGENDA FOR TVA SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING 4/18/86 8:30 - 9:15 Review of Ontjoing TVA Activities (Novak/Bernero/Spessard/ Weiss /01)
.Results of Employee Concerns Inspection at Sequoyah Follow-up From Employee Concerns Briefing 9:15 - 9:30 Letter to TVA Regarding I&H Supervisors (Liebennan) 9:30 - 10:00
. Sanitizing / Safety-Related Review Program (Thompson)
Resources Procedure 10:00 -10:30 Discussion,of Region !! Issues (01shinski)
'0:30 - 10:45 Of Return of Request for D. Hicks Investi(: en 4/3/86 gHayes) 10:45 - 11:00 Response to TVA's Appendix B Latter l
l 11:00 - 11:30 Management Approval of A6ninistrative Procedures for Review of Employee Concern: and Resource Allocations (Novak) l l
l l
I 0
i 1x1
p.
Is nF o
)
AGENDA FOR TVA SENIOR
/
MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING 5/22/86 F
2:00 - 3:00 Review of Ongoing TVA Activities (Novak/Bernero/Spessard/Weise/01)
Enforcement Package Status (Axelrad)
Employee Concerns Review Status (Youngblood)
Revi'ew of RCP Seal Line Penetration (Youngblood)
TVA Welding Program (Liaw)
Overview of Design Review by TVA at Sequoyah (Spessard) 3:00 - 3:10 QTC Record Review Status (Richardson) 3:10 - 3:30 Discussion of Region II !ssues (Weise) 3:30 - 3:45 Status of OI nsues (Hayes) 3:45 - 4:00 Miscellaneous
~
Commission Meeting 6/6/86 (Vugraphs out for comments)
INPO Letter (Thompson)
Employee Concerns Letter (Wessman)
Next SMT meeting 4:00 - 4:30 Tour of Records Storage Spaces (Richardson) l l
l l
l v
u.
n o
o
=
,o*
s e
AGENDA FOR TVA SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING OF 09/08/86 3:00 p.m.
EW/W Conference Room 3:00 - 3:45 Review of Ongotog Activities
-Sequoyah-Schedule for Reviews and Inspections (Wessman/Spessard)
-StatusofReviewonVolumes1&2(Youngblood))
-StatusofEmployeeConcernsReview(Youngblood
-Employee Concerns and QA/QC (Spessard)
)
l
-Sequoyah - Welding SER (Liaw) l
-BrownsFerryLicensingIssuesandSchedule(Muller) l
-FOIARequests(Richardson) 3:45 4:00 01 Activities (Hayes) i
-Approach to H & I and Sequoyah Restart 4:00 - 4:15 RegionIIAct'ivities(Zech)
SixthStatusReport(SECY86-1E)(Wessman) 4:15 - 4:30 TVA ' Certification of Readiness to Restart Sequoyah" 4:30 - 4:35 (Youngblood) j Lessons-LearnedApproach(Goodwin) l 4:35 - 4:45 i
4:45 - 5:00 Miscellaneous (Wessman)
-Next Commission Meeting
-TVA's Conflict of Interest Status
-ActionItees(SeeENCLOSURE1)
-Approval of Minutes from 8/6 and 8/20 Meetings
-Next SMT Meeting
-QTC File Review Connission Paper (Peranich) l' D.
N-
- - -