ML20147B276
| ML20147B276 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 02/29/1988 |
| From: | Sears P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Randazza J Maine Yankee |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8803020048 | |
| Download: ML20147B276 (2) | |
Text
__
9 February 29, 1988 Docket No. 50-309 Mr. J. B. Randazza Executive Vice President
. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company
)
83 Edison Drive Augusta, Maine 04336 l
Dear Mr. Randazza:
SUBJECT:
RE00EST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING SECTION 1.2 0F GENERIC LETTER 83-28 In conducting our review of your November 10, 1983 submittal relating to Section 1.2 of Generic Letter 83-28, we have determined that we will need additional information identified in the enclosure to continue our review.
In order for us to maintain our review schedule, your response is requested within 30 days of your receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Please contact me at (301) 492-1437 if you have any questions concerning this letter.
Sincerely,
. Original signed by:
Patrick M. Sears, Project Manager PWR Pro.iect Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Proiects I/II
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/ enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Dodit FLle, NRC & Local PDRs, PDI-3 R/F, SVarga, B8oger, MRushbrook, PSears OGC., Edordan, JPartlow ACRS (10), RWessman G46
' 0FC :PDI-3
- PDI-3
- ACTDIR/PDI.3:
.....:............:. p f.....:.........J..:
NAME :PSears mw
- MRt shyreok :VRooney
,'k DATE:02O/88
- 02/h88
- 02/A/88 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 8003020048 080229 DR ADOCK 05000309 PDR
)
\\-
ENCLOSURE 1 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A review of your November 10, 1983 response to Generic letter 83-28 on the Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events identified a need for additional information.
It is requested that updated information be provided within 30 days for the following questions concerning paragraphs of section 1.2, Post-Trip Review Data and Information Capability of your November response. Discussions of the requested information have been held 10, 1983 between Ms. Ofstering, of your staff, and Mr. N. Oudley, Senior Operations Specialist.
NRC Position 1.2.2.2:
If PORV position is not monitored, how How is PORV position monitored?
are the existing set of monitored parameters sufficient to establish that the plant remains within the design envelope for the accideat conditions analyzed in Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR?
NRC Position 1.2.2.2:
What is the sampling rate for the analog data base for engineering units conversion?
NRC Position 1.2.2.3 (Piant Computer):
What is the duration of the time history (minutes before trip and minutes after trip)?
NRC Position 1.2.2.5:
What is the required retention time for post trip data, information, and physical evidence?.
i