ML20141N249

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Review of DOE 850219 Suppl to Application for Certificate of Compliance for Model MH-1A Spent Fuel Cask. Suppl Resolves NRC 830224 Concerns Re Operating Procedures, Acceptance Tests & Maint Program
ML20141N249
Person / Time
Site: 07106639
Issue date: 03/25/1985
From: Williams C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Odegaarden R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20141N246 List:
References
FOIA-85-791 NUDOCS 8603060005
Download: ML20141N249 (2)


Text

-

O FCTC:CEV yAR 2 5 M

71-6639 l

l l met:0RANDUM FOR: Richard 11. Ddegaarden FCTC, Nt:SS

! FROM: Charles E. W1111ans, FCTC, f.HSS l

SUBJECT:

DOE APPLICATION FOR M1-1 A SPENT FUEL CASK l SUPPLEME!!T DATED FEBRUAD.Y 19, 1985 The review of the supplement dated February 19, 1985, is limited to the areas of Operating Procedures, Acceptance Tests, and I;aintenance Progran as was the initial review reported on February 23, 1993.

Operating Procedures f

I

1. The revised procedures have satisfactorily resolved the f!D.C coments contained in the letter of February 24, 1983. The ravised procedures, however, require clarification of the instructions in Section 7.3.1, "Previously Loaded Cask." Step 1 should not address a loaded cask and Steps 3, 4 and 5 are not consistent with the conditions being discussed.
2. Step 42 provides instructions relative to nonitoring cask surface temperature prior to shipnent to verify compliance with ti71.43(q).

l The accessible cask surface, when the cask is assembled for shipnent.

l 15 the fire shell. Discuss the rationale for selecting a location I above the fire shell to nonitor cask surface temperature.

l 3. It is noted that the revised procedure states, "If a partial load is desired, the empty basket coenartments do not need to be filled

! with dunnage. Also, for partial shionents, there is no preferred l loading arrangenent." It is assumed that appronriate analyses have l

been nade to support these statements.

I i

Accentance Tests and Hafntenance Progran i The revised procedures have satisfactorily resolved the tnt coments i

contained in the letter of February 24, 19P3. However, a review of the

! revised procedures resulted in the followino coments:

l l 8603060005 860108 l PDR FOIA i AUDIN95-791 PDR l l . . .

)

I me ronu ne no somacu otso OFFICIAL RECORD COPY p '

/

Picherd ". ^4pearden -?-

t

1. In instruction should be added to the second neragrar.h in Section i

" . ?,f:aintenance Prnorret, reouirino a chect nn the rinisture content of the wood whenever the steel sheathing has been kreached. An

, accentance criteria should be given.

2. Paragraph ".P. 7, "iscellaneous, should be exnanded to recuire a check. on the reisture centent of the stond if initial inspection revrals rcisture in the steel sheathina.

, Praisians The cactanina drutinos have been revised an? additiona.1 s' rat <inas shniting cask em! tasket details are not: included in the application. The revised drwincs alona with the additional detail drawinas satisfactorily resolve j the t.TC co-ents conts.ined in the letter of f ahruary 24,1"^3.

g\na\ W Charles r. :illians Distribution:

CEWilliams Docket File '  ;

NMSS R/F FCTC R/F I

i b?

or rice > M FCTC a........... ............. ............. .... .............

m,,,,,,,,,

waN^w > C,E,W i l,1,1,am,s,: a,1 ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,

^" >; .0,3,/,75/,85, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

we oau :ns no soi nacu an ' ' ~

OFFICi. '