ML20141M838
| ML20141M838 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/26/1986 |
| From: | Zech G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Karam R Neely Research Reactor, ATLANTA, GA |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141M839 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900903 NUDOCS 8602280383 | |
| Download: ML20141M838 (3) | |
Text
o 8
g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
5 t
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%...../
February 26, 1986 Docket No. 99900903/85-01 Georgia Institute of Technology Neely Nuclear Research Center ATTN: Mr. Radib Karam Director 900 Atlantic Drive, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30322 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. S. Alexander of this office on December 20, 1985, of your facility at Atlanta, Georgia and to the discussions of our findirgs with you and Mr. S. Chester at the conclusion of the inspection.
The purpose o# this inspection was to observe irradiation of Rockbestos cable specimens from the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and review related documentation.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter. The inspector noted instances in which activities affecting quality were being conducted without documented instructions or procedures and in which one of your Quality Assurance Manual requirements was not met.
Please provide us within 30 days from the date of this letter a written statement containing:
(1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items; (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence; and (3) the dates that your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
The responses requested by this letter are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reductior, Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Comission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
8602280303 860226 PDR GA999 EEIGIT 99900903 PDR 1
Georgia Institute of Technology February 26, 1986 Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
'A Gary G.
ech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspect 1on and Enforcement
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A-Notice of Nonconformance 2.
Appendix B-Inspection Report No. 99900903/85-01 3.
Appendix C-Inspection Data Sheets (2 pages)
Georgia Institute of Technology February 26, 1986 Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you, i
Sincerely, p 1: wad M gyy, lack g
Gary G. Zech, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcernent
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A-Notice of Nonconformance 2.
Appendix B-Inspection Report No. 99900903/85-01 3.
Appendix C-Inspection Data Sheets (2 pages) a 1
i
\\ Distribution:
MB:IE:09 VPB Reading D0AVT Reading RVollmer JStone SAlexander (2.)
UPotapovs 1
dh, VPB:DQAVT SC/\\PB:DQAVT VPB:DQAVT SAlexander:tt UPotapovs GGZech j
2/2 /86 2/J4/86 2/7486 0
9 po
.