ML20141M580
| ML20141M580 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/07/1983 |
| From: | Jamarl Cummings NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA) |
| To: | Webb D ILLINOIS, STATE OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141M494 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-91-187 NUDOCS 9209020271 | |
| Download: ML20141M580 (2) | |
Text
... _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ -
~
O O
u June 7, 1983 4
Dan K. Webb Esq.
U.S. Attorney's Office Northern District of Illinois
.t
.a 1500 South Everett McKinley Dirksen Bldg.
]
" ' ' ' ~ p~
- ,u,
}L g--
219 South Dearborn Street i
Chicago, Illinois 60604
"'. 0}:.LU Foiic
Dear Mr. Webb:
i 24, 1083 Hr. Robert M. Burton of the U.S.
On May 3,1982, through January (14RC), Office of Investioat Nuclear Regulatory Commission an investigation concerni an alle ion tha falsified quality assurance documentation, he documen ion perta'ned to eq ipment scheduled to be installed at various nuclear power plant facilities presently under construction throughout the midwest. The Zack Company is a major supplier of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment to nuclear power facilities.
A t altered quality assurance documents 1h readily admitted the icials to the quality assurance documen g' and forged th names certif tation. Specifically, altered cei tified test results which document the integrit and quality the metal used to fabricate-HVAC equipment. It should be noted that in the construction of a nuclear power
~ plant it is required that_ safety-related material, sych as HVAC equipment, be verified to_ a particular quality and standard. Rather than conducting the d verifying the integrity and quality of the materials appre ri ch e a used altered quality assurance documentation and subverted the uali y assurance p ocess as required b," f;RC regulations.
hj-(matelyaoneconthperiodinsovember1980.
stated the engaged in th imprnTe conduct for op r. _-
fur stated did not' add any information:to phe altered docu... ntation hic knew or. ieved was inaccurate or false-an(
motive _ for engaging in suc.
nduct was to expedite the shipment of the terial. The t<RC identified approximately 22 instances'in which material-test reports were altered.
The tiRC has conducted a technical review of the equipnent associated with the altered quality assurance documentation. This review did not. indicate that substandard naterial has been utilized at nuclear construction sites. While this mey-substantially weaken the prospects for. a criminal prosecution, I feel obliged to bring th s ma er to voor attention and convey the seriousness with which the liRC view
.onduct. The alteration of-the required quality assurance r cords was accomfiished in a willful and deliberate manner
,\\\\h. Sb %
9209020271 9t1230 rDR FOIA IACK91-107 PDR
/
< !n V
/
[9 ;e ll
]l p,,cu v W f,R,h[ ANf r& -
e +-
1vm-
,4
+ -.
-_,..--,,m.
.,.m
-....s
~.#-u
-m,
. ~
5' f
f
?'.
by a senior executive of a large company supplying safety related equipment to nuclear power facilities.
y 1
In conclusion the NRC does examine and rely on quality assurance records of l
r.
equipment suppliers to buclear facilities and the Office of Inspector end I
Auditor's(01A)revie of a il le reports and interviews, which are I
(
enclosed, suggest tha may have engaged in a course of conduct which deceived the NR and which may be in violation of 18 USC 1001.
g Accordingly, OIA request that you review the enclosed infonnation to determine if the criminal prosecution is warranted,
,)
r.
Sincerely, I
)
l-I
-l James J. Cummings, Director Of fice of Inspector and Auditor
- 3.._
'b
Enclosures:
i+
As Stated
{-.
Julian Greenspun, Deputy Chief l
cc:
?
^
j for Litigation, DOJ
- g Distribution 83-59 OIA Read $ng
' Al' u g l i a j
i bec: Commission (5) w/o attach b
J.
McDermott, v/ attach j
h EDO, w/o attach
(
OGC, v/o attach ELD, v/o attach 7
t' 01, w/o attach Rbgion III /
t.
L t-f
{
~
b oIA!
dN hit +c r >
OIA:
i I
t-f' '"'Ii..Af u g lia ; l W,{ U g:[, f (
gg hc.
Kgrp.
.. LCM-
- in g s cin ) I.
-6/6/S3 I
- 3 2
- =.~ - 3 9 7, g;
3
-.