Text

Documents Meeting Conducted W/Util in Jackson,Ms on 970502 Re Util Presentation of Summary of Safety,Regulatory & Performance Philosophies.Attendance List & Viewgraphs Encl
	ML20141K820
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf, Arkansas Nuclear, River Bend, Waterford
Issue date:	05/27/1997
From:	Gwynn T; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Hutchinson C; ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
References
	NUDOCS 9705300153
	Download: ML20141K820 (153)
	v • d • e

I sm_.

, C L 5 4 A R E Gll L d T ^, o '< ',0 W.H S3;C N n

s i v, > > i ;. y

=

a.

. m :., n. u w, ca i

l 3,8y'j ^

}

C. Randy Hutchinson, Vice President j

Operations Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, Arkansas 72801-0967

SUBJECT:

NRC/ENTERGY OPERATIONS INC (EOl) SENIOR MANAGEMENT MEETING This letter dt 9ments the meeting conducted between the NRC and Entergy Operations, Inc, at the EGI corporate office in Jackson, Mississippi, on May 2,199 7. This meeting was open for public observation. A list of meeting participants is included as Enclosure 1.

During the meeting, EOl managers presented a summar of safety, regulatory, and

[

performance philosophies. Also, EOl managers discussed current business ventures, performance indicators, and corporate assessment programs. The site vice presidents for Arkansas Nuclear One, Grand Gulf, River Bend, and Waterford 3 presented their plant performance over the past year and also discussed future challenges.

The NRC found these discussions valuable in clarifying the licensee's areas of focus and in

~

updating the status of licensee activities. A copy of the licensee's presentation is included as Enclosure 2.

At the end of the meeting, the Region IV administrator summarized areas of regulatory

- interest.

i in accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you, l

Sincerely, l

/" /~

Thomas P. Gwynn, re or

,ects[

Division of Reactor e

9&

590FIMlllIIpp 9705300153 970527 PDR-ADOCK 05000313 P.

PDR a

j m

Entergy Operations. Inc. Docket Nos:

ANO: 50-313: 50-368 GGNS: 50-416 RBS: 50 458 W3: 50 382 License Nos..

ANO: DPR-51; NPF-6 GGNS: NPF 29 RBS: NPF-47 W3:

NPF-38

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List

2. Licensee Presentation cc:

Joseph J. Hagan, Vice President Operations - Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 John R. McGaha, Vice President - Operations River Bend Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 220 St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 Chartes M. Dugger, Vice President Operations Waterford 3 Entergy Operations, Inc.

)

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 1

Executive Vice President

& Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, Mississippi 39286-1995

I-l i

Entergy Operations, Inc.

-3 Vice President l

Operations Support Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, Mississippi 39286 l

Manager, Washington Nuclear Operations ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville, Arkansas 72801 David D. Snellings, Jr., Director Division of Radiation Control and i

Emergency Management Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Mail Slot 30

)

Little Rock, Arkansas 72205-3867 Manager -

Rockville Nuclear Licensing Framatome Technologies

.1700 Rockville Pike, Suite 525 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P.O. Box 651 Jackson, Mississiopi 39205 Winston & Strawn 1400 L Street, N.W. - 12th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005-3502 Sam Mabry, Director Division of Solid Waste Management Mississippi Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 10385 l

Jackson, Mississippi 39209 i

\\

Entergy Operations, Inc. President Claiborne County Board of Supervisors Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 Manager of Operations Bechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 2166 Houston, Texas 77252-2166 General Manager Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 The Honorable William J. Guste, Jr.

Attorney General Department of Justice State of Louisiana P.O. Box 94005 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9005 Office of the Governor State of Mississippi Jackson, Mississippi 39201 Mike Moore, Attorney General Frank Spencer, Asst. Attorney General State of Mississippi P.O. Box 22947 Jackson, Mississippi 39225 Dr. F. E. Thompson, Jr.

State Health Officer State Board of Health P.O. Box 1700 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Eddie S. Fuente, Director State Liaison Officer Division of Radiation Healt

Mississippi Department of Health P.O. Box 1700 Jackson, Mississippi 39215-1700

i Entergy Onerations, Inc.

5-Director, Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Affairs Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 Vice President, Operations

]

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 General f.ianager Plant Operations River Bend Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 220 St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 Director - Nuclear Safety River Bend Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 220 St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 Mark J. Wetterhahn, Esq.

Winston & Strawn 1401 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005-3502 Manager - Licensing River Bend Station Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 220 St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 The Honorable Richard P. leyoub Attorney General P.O. Box 94095 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9095 H. Anne Plettinger 3456 Villa Rose Drive Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70806 l

l l

l t

Entergy Operations. Inc.,

President of West Feliciana I

Police Jur/

P.O. Box 1921 St. Francisville, Louisiana 70775 Larry G. Johnson, Director Systems Engineering Cajun Electric Power Coop. loc.

10719 Airline Highway P.O. Box 15540 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70895 William H. Spell, Administrator Louisiana Radiation Protection Division P.O. Box 82135 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884-2135 General Manager, Plant Operations Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Manager - Licensing Manager Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Chairman Louisiana Public Service Commission One American Place, Suite 1630 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825-1697 Director. Nuclear Safety &

Regulotory Affairs Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Parish President St. Charles Parish P.O. Box 302 Hahnville, Louisiana 70057

Entergy Operations, Inc. Mr. William A. Cross Bethesda Licensing Office 3 Metro Center Suite 610 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 l

)

l i

i 4

I

Entergy Operations, Inc. MAY 2 71997 bec to DCD (IE45) l bec distrib. by RIV:

Regional Administrator Resident inspector DRP Director MIS System l

Branch Chief (DRP/C)

RIV File l

Project Engineer (DRP/C)

DRS-PSB l

l Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

B. Henderson, PAO l

Director, WCFO C. Hackney, RSLO i

l Branch Chief (DRP/D)

Project Engineer (DRP/D)

]

l t

l I

l i

I l

i

\\

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_ANO\\AN0502MS.DRP; R:\\_GG\\GG0502MS.DRP; R:\\_RB\\RB0502MS.DRP; R:\\_WAT\\WT0502MS.DRP To receive copy of document. Indicate in box: "C" = Copy without epdotpres "E" = Copy with, enclosures "N" = No copy i

RIV:PE:DR,P/D 0 C:Ql3PjC C:DRP/lpd(,[p D:DRP Jf/

l GAPick;dP EEColiins PHHayf lL W/

TPGwynnf]

5/t%97 5724/97 5/L4/JQ J 5/J//97 OFFIC AL REgD COPY 300002

~

Entergy Operations, Inc. MAY 2 71997 bec to DCD (IE45) bec distrib. by RIV-Regional Administrator Resident inspector DRP Director MIS System i

Branch Chief (DRP/C)

RIV File Project Engineer (DRP/C)

DRS-PSB Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

B. Henderson, PAO Director, WCFO C. Hackney, RSLO Branch Chief (DRP/D)

Project Engineer (DRP/D) i l

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_ANO\\AN0502MS.DRP; R:\\_GG\\GG0502MS.DRP; R:\\_RB\\RB0502MS.DRP; R:\\_WAT\\WT0502MS.DRP To receive copy of document. Indicate in box: "C" = Copy without epo$res "E" = Copy with, enclosures "N" = No copy l

RIV:PE:DRP/D p C:QR,P/C l C:DRN,(/) D:DRP ff l

J GAPick;dW EEColiins PHHaMi{ W/

TPGwynn7]

5l'h97 STidt97 5l])t/ $ [ ]

5/)]I97 OFFICIAL REgD COPY

\\

J

E,cL0sW E 1 l

EOI/NRC SENIOR M ANAGEMENT MEETING M a,y 2, 1 9 9 7 i

l FINAL ATTENDEES LIST ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Don limtz, President & CEO Ellis Merschoff, Regional Administrator, RIV Jerry Yelverton, Executive VP & COO Pat Gwynn, Director, DRP, RIV John McGaha, VP Operations, RBS Phil liarrell, Chief, Project Branch D, DRP Randy Hutchinson, VP Operations, ANO Elmo Collins, Chief, Project Branch C, DRP Chuck Dagger, VP Operations, WF3 Bill Beckner, Director, Project Directorate IV 1 Joe Hagan, VP Operations, GGNS David Wigginton, Project Manager, RBS Fred Titus, VP Engineermg Ward Smith, RBS Senior Resident Inspector Jerrold Dewcase, VP Operations Support Lee Keller, WF-3 Senior Resident Inspector Carolyn Shanks, VP. Finance & Administration Jenrufer Dixon-Herrity, GGNS Senior Resident Inspector Joe Blount, General Attorney - Generation Randy Edington, General Manager, ANO

)

i Bill Eaton, General Manager, GGNS Steve Bethay, Director, NS&L, ECH Rick King, Director, Nuclear Safety. RBS Early Ewing, Director, Nuclear Safety, WF3 Dwight Mims, Director, L; censing, ANO Kenneth Hughey, Director, NS&RA, GGNS Larry Temple, Director, Nuclear Support 1

Jeanne Kenney, Director, Business Services Phil Miracle, Director, Generation and Emphyee Communications i

Kelli Bartield, Manager, Nuclear Communicat,ons l

Mike Krupa, Manager, Assessments Les England, Sr. Staff Engmeer, NS&L, ECll

t l

l 6

l i

1 F

l 1

P i

i i

ENCLOSURE 2 LICENSEE PRESENTATION I

P

I i

?f S' T

i

/ si)

SEE w

.c r.,

<a t

l ie J

"'j.". - hA f

/, j'sM (*

3,J y

x.

i 9

w

.1

~ %i

.i

- ht, a,>

stanoop f'?%'

yo n om n a

Wl..

i'

~

.;w l

=

. w:..s. -. L -l..

n emphis " a.

m w

<, 9._. 4 ft. 'g1.3 --

Ist4 s

sn t.

xn c

o q-

.s 2

g

,gg su a.

ock 3

3mer =

u hikl e.

5 k.

I l

AR g

"in p f *'

),{,,[, m.

" b, " lj %

G

..pu i

k "I

winona

,3 k

n Y

r-i it seenae a

.,%7

'. r> ohm bu? h nanana m

.y3 M L s sfi If P

__

de P

,.s,.g

$e g

r:r m w

u m m 1[.( G ivepo W l, @@ Mca y 9,,

Erde y, gt4* tsomav,_wmg:-f, )L.

p-g,

'~

I t

rayi.

L 3,g o

- ~A m. g~-

d, ac son.,3.;m-v.

y

,vo.u, n

0 U 1: S1ANA e

4 a-g

,,;,I'

'l'S c3 Ear 3\\

k i,

. ?,E

ca:;EOff. ld &

ic 2

Kt atdir 6.

s s

gag iv.

y r. A y.

Qft h

i b-

..?

{iisalga mb e\\,

~r_/a{>y,_JM,,;j[3 g,a9%:" A b

c Ni.

y

..v we m( -.

t.w -

a v+,.ee nnssa u.a mesc<

in 7'pd?" Nl 59,.s"',,? [ i,2,'i/d, y

i..+

d i:_.e.3 *.

m es,o g

s o

-f

%~@" P,:. '-

'gp tW:!; th.

- QW

.Y.

x e

.v ' - cm

~-

(f'pfj"f'P',

y

,%- tu -

u* *' ".. n i

w i-1:h ha t 6",

s ht0 L.

N

" ' ~ ~ "

l RouBe N.

eaa)nont og

, c 3-j$F;F'%--CC_'_' M I$ g j % d;j

~

ean I

1

+

i NRC/ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

SENIO.R MANAGEMENT MEETING i

c AGENDA l

l' Friday, May 2,1997-l 7:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.

i Echelon One Auditorium, Jackson, MS l

i

\\

i.

7:30 Welcome & Introductions Don Hintz E

7:40 NRC Opening Remarks Ellis Merschoff, et. al.

j' 7:50 Management Philosophy on Multi-Plant Operation Don Hintz 2

{

8:10 1996 Review & Industry Comparison Don Hintz j

8:30 EOl Business Ventures (Maine Yankee)

Jerry Yelverton j

l 8:45 EOI Performance Indicators Jerry Yelverton 9:00 Corporate Assessment Program Changes &

Mike Krupa j

Year End Results.

1 s

' 9:30 Employee Concerns Program Improvements Joe Blount a

l 9:45 Break l

10:00 W3 Performance and Challenges Chuck Dugger i

10:30 ANO Performance and Challenges Randy Hutchinson

~

l1:00 GGNS Performance and Challenges Joe Hagan 11:30 RBS Performance and Challenges John McGaha Noon Lunch (Afternoon Session, next page) w

,1-a

Afternoon Session j

12:30 EOI Engineering Assessments Fred Titus 1:00 Compliance and the Regulatory Environment Ellis Merschoff, NRC i

1:30 Group Discussion All 2:00 EOI/NRC Closing Remarks / Adjourn Hintz, Merschoff 4

0 e

I

,J 4

i

}

4

6 l

L i

i EOI Multi Plant Management i

1 Philosophy

~

Don Hintz Chief Executive Officer l

j i

?

1 i

i

4 BENCHMARKING OBJECTIVES i

Define And Clarify Nuclear f

Excellence N

i

=

j Assess Entergy's Performance Against The Nuclear Industry j..

Nuclear Excellence Establish Targets To Achieve j

l 2

1

.:i;1!,!

lt i

i I

!;!!I ii i!

l S

3 ER U

SA E

M G

N IK

~

f-R

'~

A A

M

(

f h

H

(

I C

A N

'f

'[

E

[

B

i i,' ;

i :

-.s ua aas as.e a, a.- o ws aa.

-+r a-.apanam a sm..m mu a.a...ema.

.a,n.w......-eu.mnnaamm

- ~.,-.n-.u

.~...,ana..-.-

n_,,..,

,n,-----

l L

/

/,

7

/,

/'

a s

/,

j

/,

/

a

+,

/

A

/,

/

l 1

a.,.#-4eawJ~ m es -ae44Le-rs.-

=.4..sprmehe, a d-4-wr-*E--eww-Nmeresas*=w.a-mmme am.ma ane.M4.hma.-

.sg #4e 4-p2.

4 & hm

.-. Amet e A44a.4,J M.,---um nD 44 4M,0.4 & J4 4 4+M.4h3 AK4Jio # & &da,# 5A JA.L &---

4d4-1.4 4h.arh p Jn i

e I

i 1

{

i i

l C

i i

j s

i l

1 I

I b

i o

-eTm.h4.. u d o se

. # ;r n e.

s:, h v..

,-~+,==.1

,->r+.,

p s._

n m.>

3,fm'W.

s,, v %..,,,, %,.

, ?.

% nt,es.)Qs..

.gn 0 9; tQ n x,li V M.w!mm$ uamu$K;fj l

a

~4 D

/c'l$

g 4

n.=7

.,S$i?,

fd Mi'?DS52%s9 9.'5f,;,h d

7W.a4zp h;.l, dii$s$.$u+1 ten,g_$fupf.4

&M*c<i&%&

? ?y{ME{

%.? %.Q ;; m[,j Q;,J' u,

ly

%'Z Q

...w4,,

-44.7-yt w..

, -.3 S+g tv#,i,QLL.~1'gp&kW;p:~ g

,m es.M.

+1a

?f

. e gw&4.atT e,. ?Ci

'h;r Q

,;*D*N Nd?M lh' Mr? *W w,

f

.- n a.,

s' e O

g

%lu m?vt.p.4'"ununp 6@~;epS'i h

O

$1;-

~'#

3

~~

t 6__' ;(([j.;

C tp;r w,4.s.

3 M

w ~e C

C vw

.U) e) c-l D

G E

Q.

O "I" $o I

-'3 xt z

o 3e

$1 O

to l

LO O

l M

i 2

e 1

4 i

1

}

4 4

s a

l 4

I.

!)i, t!!f$

Il l1fl:

,,il:!iil,

!!i.IlIl!

s e

t iS ev i

f F

O t

g n

n a

s i r l

a a

lP h

r i

S e

t e

s a

n d

s eM ee O

zc e s&

s ir mu p

et l

c n

o o

o a

i e

r x s l

P P

P a e MR i'

.i

!l j1 I

i I

Management Focus i

i People l

- Safety Culture j

- Freedom to Raise Concerns i

- Employee Communications Processes

- Total Quality Approach

- Peer Group Implementation of Best practices P ant

- Common Goals

- Resource Sharing 1

il

!.ii'lil;!

!,l!:!ll,!

l!:!i!

s la t

s i

e 5

r rs r

2 r

C H as u

1 W

ea s

1 l

c K

lcC a

a t

e F%

s/

u s

ol A

M t8 Ci Nn y7 l

i t

N c

nm 8t i

e C

o3 9s I

9e p

i.

g R

a c8 1B t

r 1

N C

a T

orP l

,--=p._

42

-s.4m s.

---w s.wa4 m w a.a.

dE umm' T-aiW.a.5A mas.4 s-s e 4emi AhshiJ-d.44--4e=4eae.=

MJhelMS-&*J-.

A JrgQ. a AAAJ_.,pu,.g&g _p,4 ws 4 4

_4 3.4aA.

.agJ.siJ,.hd..es.4--4m.44S-J'sm.-

4 l

f

/

l l

?

/

f f

l 1

/

l l%

Y blT l

g y

e e

m*8 p' ~

b..

_~ 2 +f s1 i

1 j

e

,, ' :} 4 j

m

,c l'

f

.y

/

p-44 f i

p 0

2 fs h,%f

' 7$, s.., l hy n\\h

,,,, p l _

. l. [(:Y'%. '. ' c t

4 # v

,m-V g

m%9 i.t gf

\\

t a

e s

'E p

e p s. q /,

~~

f.Q.t"

~

Ri

[

44 p

by % ; $ s()~f %,

.ls #

,b.,,,'-,y Q

^,

g h

a

/

%~

Y s

r e M

/

c.

)

)-c s

'j g. in:-

+

s l

e ;.

9 I

co

' n

+

w,q&w'e.

.-.Y,t

~

y

~y

?

T.,

o' y

s

. f*

V y%I l5;/,l:' f &

c4

,% c e

~

y.

k,

/*

j//,a h

f',,r )..

,s

/r h y-y*. / '

b.

gl g

hf,

y.,y

'., ~ <?

g 9i 4.:. O f,,'r:;.;.r?qe:e ' g:

gy vu\\'

1,,

t,,

e

-n s

c#., ;, ~-

f[-

m' *.,p,1 4

e

~

4 eu.4 f,

l 4

^

,2p I

e

,9 fr ~Y

[ r.

o. hi

%zg.z.

x-p:.

, e

.u.

1-

~w

&~

.v

,r

-e

a

-- a

~'"r

i NUCLEAR 1996 HIGHLIGHTS 1

I l

. EOl's Highest Combined Average Capacity Factor j

- 89.4%

l All 3 Units That Refueled Set Record Durations l

- RB - 39 Days,19 Hours,25 Minutes (New EOl Record) j

- ANO 1 - 39 Days,20 Hours,14 Minutes i

- GG - 41 Days,12 Hours i

Record High Total Generation at 38,338,399 MWh

- Increased 8.4%

l Lowest Ever EOl Combined Prod Cost + Capital 10 19.1 Mills /KWh ( 3 Million MWh }

1

NUCLEAR 1996 HIGHLIGHTS All EOI Units Now in NRC Region IV Implementation of Outage Resource Sharing

-Over 800 Loaned Employees 2 Sites Won State Recognition for Total Quality:

-GG Won Mississippi's Governor'-s Award f

- ANO Won Arkansas' Quality Achievement Award Working Possiale New Nuclear Ventures

-NYPA

-Maine Yankee 11

)

i Current Performance i

r l

SALP Ratings l

l 1

l 2.5 I

.. ~ _4.),

E AE M,B 2

t 1.5 E N a

lige RBS 0.5 O M FMn!

E 801 Avg.

l 0

ANO GGNS RBS W3 EDI 98 E 98 Goal i

I L

i

~

Y i

I I

l l

Current Performance l

i I

I lbPOlbtings l

1 3

2.5 ANO t

2

$.~

t GGNS 0.5

. I,E, 5

M res 1

M9 t

$3!!!5)

M

$m$$

E01 Avg.

~

0 AbD GGNS fBS M

E01 98 98 Goal l

Avg.

Goal

s i,

Current Performance i

Production Cost + New Capital i

i i

30

' ANO 25 1

j. 20 E GGNS M

15 egi:

RBS m

w

=

10 ga 3

dVi

.= W3 l

5 g

l m

EO Avg.

0-

~

ANO GGNS RBS W3 EO 98 98 Goal l

1 I

ch i

df:

l

$298 l

l i

Yb l

c i

L O

l 8

w ri p:aan a w wne w num s

.a C

i0

_l.

O

h I

I1

~C O

E Eh a

O

~

g 8

8 8

8 le 4

.soloe3

ioedeO %

OPERATING PERFORMANCE Thru May 2,1997 3

l ANO-1 -189 Days On Line ANO 136 Days On Line i

Grand Gulf-128 Days On Line River Bend - 262 Days On Line j

Waterford 3 - 249* Days On Line t

(*RFO 8 Began 4/11/1997 - W3 in Day 21 of Outage) s 16 4

t i

1997 CHALLENGES i

i t

l Waterford 3 - Continued Improvement i

i i

Improving Regulatory Performance l

I Xew Business Ventures l

License & Design Basis Verification 17 l

I i

~

Entergy X..uc ear, Inc.

h i

6 l

t Maine Yankee RELIABLE ELECT RICITY SINCE1972 l

l niergy en

~-

t 18 i

i L

I i

Performance Indicators Jerry Yelverton Executive VP & COO 6

i 19

i Characterize Performance l

Safety

Production l

Cost i

i People t

20 1

I Safety Indicators q' Monthly}

Violations

Fuel Reliability LERs

Allegations SCRAMS

Exposure Unplanned LCOs

IndustrialSafety Transients /down-

IXPO Indicators power Corrective Action Significant Events Program Event Precursors

Design Eng. Backlog Safety System 21 Performance

Production Indicators

'< Monthl 1

Ys

Capacity Factor

Heat Rate

Capability Factor Thermal Unplanned Performance Index Capability loss

Outage Duration

MWh Generated

Post Outage Runs

MWh Losses 22

Cost Indicators (Monthly)

Budget Performance

Fuel Cost l

Cash Flow Perf.

Radwaste Cost Present Estimate Inventory Outage Cost

EVA i

Production Cost

Investment Forward Cost Plan / Performance t

f

+

23

I People Indicators j

(Monthly) t Headcount

Management Turnover Contact Time Promotions

Industry Involvement Transfers Resource Sharing (Semiannually)

Educational l

Attendance Trend Investment Percent Overtime l

Employee Survey Results i

24

4 t

Quarterly Reports l

QA Results j

Fuel Margin Design Margin Maintenance Rule j

Purpose:

)

To provide independent, self critical feedback of performance in various functionalareas to the site &

corporate management 29

Assessment Focus t

i Assessments i

Mid Cycle Review Quarterly Insights Reviews r

Oversight 30 t

i Assessment Performance History i

l h-l 46 i

50-/

41 40 1997 (Estimated)

E 40 /

l 32

30 /

o l

g 20 /

.o 9

!10 /

z i

0 4

j 1990 1992 1994 1996 31 l

i l

l b

l Entergy PEER Participation i

k i

l I

/

lto 150 180-/

t l

160 /

1%7M W 134 l

m 140 /

l m

1 W

i e 120-/

i n.

89 o 100-/

m i

4^

h./

l

.O E

60-/

I s

29 z

g, 20-/

in; is n

ii o

a n

a 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 l

32 i

Industry PEER Participation i

8 5

/

a 160 /

149 140-/

i e 120-/

i e

96 i

$ 100-/

t i

80-/

m E

M l

E 60-/

s 40-/

l 20-/

0-4 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 33 i

l

- - J

Assessment Results i

. Identified Improvement needs in all functional areas i.e.

- Work control

- Training i

- CR threshold

- Procedure adherence

- Personnel safety violations j

- Radiation Protection Practices l

- Etc.

34

l Assessment Effectiveness All recommendations are now formally tracked by the site for disposition

. Quarterly insights reviews by the assessment team held with the COO

Follow-up in each functional area every cycle

Full review of performance at midcycle i

35

Summary I

. We are making changes to improve the effectiveness of our process

. We think this identifies declining trends early

. EOI is committed to finding and fixing our own problems i

36

c i

t r

l Employee Concerns Program Improvements Joe Blount General Attorney-Generation t

37 I

l

===.

Background===

. Performed periodic employee culture surveys

- Utilize outside independent consultant

. Continually improve current programs

. Identified need to provide independence from site organization t

38 l

l p

i v

Program Enhancements

~

i

. Common program at all sites

Corporate Employee Concerns Coordinator (CECC)

- reports to CEO Full time employee concerns coordinators at the sites (SECC) 39 l

Program Enhancements Publicize program 1-800 confidential phone ;ine

- BellSouth voice mail Standard employee safety survey for use by SECCs and CECC t

40 i

1 5

Site ECC Changes j

+ Site Employee Concerns Coordinators i

- Report to Corporate ECC l

Corporate Coordinator reports to CEO

- Two to four year rotational assignment

- Single point of contact for site concerns nuclear safety / quality industrial safety / health personnel 41 i

i

i i

Site ECC Role

. Serve as employee advocate

- ensures employees feel concern was adequately addressed

. Document and assure timely resolution of allconcerns i

. Screen and investigate concerns

- request assistance of other SECCs, CECC, f

or independent third party if needed j

42 i

y l

Site ECC Role Train employees and site management

- features of employee concerns program Interface with contractors

- ensure awareness that Entergy's program includes employees of contractors Track and report concerns by type Report status periodically to CECC 43

Corporate ECC Responsibilities Coordinate Training for SECCs Maintain database of concerns / status for all sites Trend concerns data

- Backlog and age of concerns

- How concerns received (phone, walk-ins, drop boxes, exit interviews, XRC) l

- Number of concerns by plant 44 i

N

Corporate ECC Responsibilities 1

Identify adverse trends a Responsible for 1-8DD number

)

Provide performance indicator information to senior management

Serve as Echelon Coordinator 45 i

I s

i t

i

{

t Status of Enhancements Video taped for distribution

- General Employee Training 1

- Key Communicators System

- New employee orientation Coldidential phone line installed

. 888-796-0369 Dedicated line for Echelon installed

- Extension 5100 46 i

i

/'

b i

I f

i Waterford3 Performance and Challenges i

Chuck Dugger Site Vice President 48 i

l Index L

W3 Plant Goals A

W3 Plant Performance

RF08 Goals

Maintenance Rule Status

Improved Tech Specs (ITS)

. Self Assessments / INFO Assist

Employee Concerns Program (ECP)

Weaknesses Identified in SALP Report Communication With the XRC 49

~

Plant Goals 1

\\

Year to date 1997 Goal

> 78.0 Capacity Factor (%)

103.23 Superior: > 82 Outstanding: > 86 l

t t

Unplanned Capability o og

< 3.0 Loss Factor (%)

i ThermalPerformance gg_g4

> 99.5

(%)

~

i t

i FuelReliability 0*00177 (microcuries/gm)

(O Defects) i Chemistry Performance i

g,3gg

< q_g5 Indicator i

Waterford 3 S.E.S.

IST Quarter 1997 Operation Summary t

100 %

a

.I....

L Z

i O

80% -

p l

6 60 % i 2/9 -0950

~

f Z

Power Reduced to 90%-

O For Turb.Viv. Test o

40 % i i-g 2/9 -1724 106% Rx Pwr l

O 20% -

-6 F-O i

< MODE 1-

+

i W

M MODE 2-i

'i-t MODE 3.

u MODE 4-

-+

MODE 5i l

+ --

+

REFUEL-t

-+

+

P f

1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/5 3/12 3/19 3/26 4/2

~.;- ~,

m e a n e +s w r n u e: w i

[vn,INUOO

-,~,~c-w~~mu 3 DAYS?f238;4 ist QTR CONT RATIN RW=3 CAPACITY T

9

~,,O.R,@@u Nist QTR$103fd; ue 4:www

~~ n hjDAJSiS CE,.,

@TIghs31Mjgf.

_. Dj 32%

51 i

r f

L:'

Fl l'l7!?f.ILt, lth,.F

,t; j e

tg.t ;;.!t; s,i>:i}!

ittli:l..!:tbl,)

x e

d D

O

(

n O

j 3

G 9

I 8

C=,

o-3

'........ ~........,.

n r

a.

d a i

r o

d

.Deh.O

. o a

f e

(

M r

+..,..... ~........ >.

t e

.a.

t

... +.......~........

ad a

. Ca, WI a

n

.. +.....

c a.

.oeh.O 3i

.......~..........

a v

t d

........+.

.... '.................a.

d n

........~.................a.Ca

+................

.........a.

rI

. Tmh.O R

........~.................a o

f e

........+......

A

.........a.

E

.........a. Cs Y

........+.......

r c

/

........ +..

..F.....

e n

.........a.

H

........ +

......~.................a."mh.O T

)

t e-N a

a

........+..

....s...

.........a.

O Wrm

........+...........,............a.Ca M

........+..........

.........a

.Nmh.O

........a v.

o

......=........a f

........:........*........n.....

. Ca,

...a r

........ s..e..

...a e

-Tmh.O

.s.....

...a P

........l..............

s....,....a.

.C=

...a t

...,...a n

=

O h.O a

0 0

9 8

7 6

1 l

P I 3 J.4 > X j o z..

LL g

I

Waterford 3 Performance Indicator Status 1

Through March,1997 YTD GOAL Capacity Factor YTD 103.23 86 Unit Capability Factor 99.95 84 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 0.02 3

HPSI / HPCS Unavailability 0.0042 0.02 l

EFW / RCIC Unavailability 0.0025 0.02 LPSI / RHR Unavailability 0.0136 0.015 Emergency A/C 0.0143 0.025 Thermal Performance Index 99.94 99.5 53 l

r Waterford 3 Performance Indicator Status Through March,1997 YTD GOAL Fuel Reliability Index 0.0018 0.0005 Chemistry Index 1.38 1.25 RadWaste Volume Generated (CuFt) 440.8 11200 Collective Radiation Exposure 5.77 150 l

Industrial Safety Accident Rate 0.00 0.4 Unplanned Scram Rate (per 7000 hrs) 0.85 1

Number of Scrams 1997 0

1 i

54 l

I RFO-8 Goals

. Safety: Xo Lost Time Accidents Scope:

- Priority 1 Task /CI's > 98 % Complete

- Priority 2 Task /CI's > 95 % Comp.ete

- Priority 3 Task /CI's > 95 % Complete

. Duration: Schedtte Adherence

. Post Outage Performance: > 60 day run 55

f RFO-8 Goals (continued) t ALARA: < 120 ManRem Radwaste Generation: < 6500 cu. ft. compatible

< S 21 Million Budget:

i 56 L

-l

t i

RFO Ops Combined Deficiency Activities i

Annunciator Deficiencies 5

Control Panel Deficiencies 32 l

i

Deferred EOS 6

l Condition Reports 31 a

TARS 4

Operator Work Arounds 106 57 L

I'

l Maintenance Rule Status I

t P

t m 173 TOTAL l

SYSTEMS t

i 13 ONon SSC 88 m A-2 SSC i

R A-1 SSC i

i 72 l

t I

58

5 Improved Technical Specifications t

Produce a high quality document

- Increased accuracy of Design Basis

- Increased clarity and user friendly

- Reduction in TS Violations Project started January 1997

Dedicated Core Team and Plant Staff l

involvement

Submittal to XRC in first quarter 1998

Implementation in first quarter 1999 59 i

1st Qtr Self Assessments 1

t Raciation Protection - Site

- Worker Knowledge

- RCA Entry & Exit

- Rad Posting 1

- High Rad Key Control Industrial Safety - Site

- Personnel Protective Equipment f

- Use & Storage of Tools and Ladders Maintenance - Corp.

- Program Implementation & Effectiveness 60 i

e a

_7

.ay, su wia_

A 4--

-._m 4

4,.

E.,

3.,46_.&,~44.J_uns_a asA.-am

._m.u,.

sg w.A__

&&4..J_4

.J.

.a 4_AA..Am en e

4 1.m.maAda 4

.h, a.

_a m s.

I l

C i

l l

)

l 1

I Q

l I

lO l

f l

m l

l 4

l t

1 6

1st Qtr IXPO Assist Visits F

0; aerations I

Plant Engineering Work Controls Emergency Planning Training 62 i

f

-s Employee Concerns Program (ECP)

Employee Concerns Expressed to ECP i

vs. Allegations Made to the NRC 16 v W."

-=- N RC

~ WkE E MION3 14 k ley %Ny g g

-*- EC P

\\

/,

6-

^

2 w

0 1st 2nd 3rd 4th ist Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr 1996 1996 1996 1996 1997 63 I

f Weaknesses Identified in SALP Report b

A.

Weak engineering support resulting in inaccurate and weak operability evaluation Design and Licensing Basis not consistently maintained for plant systems and components Operators missed recognizing TS LCOs and accepted aoor engineering evaluations 2

Weak implementation of the IST program

Ineffective Self Assessments 64

Communicating with the XRC i

Schec.uled weekly conference calls with NRR anc. the Region Visits to the Region by Senior Staff Daily debriefing with the residents l

Senior Management weekly debriefing with the residents 1

65 1

?

l

f 1

1996 Safety Performance r

f f

Arkansas Quality Achievement Award l

OSHA VPP " STAR" IPAP inspection No Fuel Leaks I

l I

1 66 i

s 6.

=

a 4

-s,

%..-a_a-_.-

--eas.-.uu

.,4 w.**-a 4a..

a4.--

.4----.

4-aJ-.s.4_.-,-

h.,-

.a....A.--4+a4---a-.m4m A

aa m

,.4 4,_a..__.%~4.a.ma._e.

l bD V

r g

^

3..

g' )

W' V '_ '.lp <!'r l '

4

(

v f) s n1., f '> -

.V

'*% Ii, '

' [

'(

,m w.

..I Ln u

,,.a4

/,

< +[i +n, 3 rr ' y :c ',

'r -

a,.v, 4, v en e a-k sn,,e<

' 4.

s. f,* ~ -

s

%c 4

t t"**

w+8 t.w

-!h,. #'

+'#

'+-E

%'l Y,*; *g#'

,6'

.'e 2.t

r.-

.e cal '

,y..

.l :Q,QN '

5'

/

i d

M i

AX d

O d

2/ ' + W:w/

M,,I.-

l W

q) u 3.,

o u..v n;4 '-n Nl" 4$ @J h(iu m-

,.-,g m.

7 3

q f'*k 1f,

N' b 3,[

.4

?b S'w,Y *'

I,

~ k,...,h{h.i@Qlik$s w.n m, - k; lhl W

e pun M/Df YW^

~

v

,~

y

.0: :..

t +re..

-J 7

ii

,:.;Q 9 -.>x

,1~

M w

m W 4.w jl>'.c mm' ' " ' ' {. } & p.'A

)L\\

K'.

o n'

$~f

.e

'fc.4, P;% N M3p.S tj$%.

J

Wi 1

i.

, c.a..v

- p7pp p a s

....s y

l

,,,"Y,

,*, mgcf

.-[*

9 4

.s H

a ws -

i s

a f.

4

g?.

'4,.&d c

9q(:

~

7M W U

x >-

W d

t M

d c

a) e, # :Ji. x.-..;

y; W i.AvP v'

M s e/.

y+.

AM.o Y,Q,_ j y,f

> g ~ ' ~

4.g,.

t

.m

.w

,., o,,. s. /s.e,+.

w a

g.p..;3.

+

4 i

v. w s - f s w, g y r -.s 4

u 1

54-

N :'

1 ny

' ' (

/d f.I

^

e[

w

.4 j.-g..~-,,..

,!c*.

',t

.3.t ; ;' f, 4

\\ * *h[ f /'gL 3 e g 31

.oe, ',,. 9 v 1*

-e,..+

w.

'q w t y

or

,, w u.-[q (

'M

[.

s 4 W; T 4

Att A'.

c V

,1 WY i

n l

M ll r

f I

f '

i

Outline 1996 Performance 1997 Challenges / Initiatives

- Safety Performance

- Challenges

- Operating Performance

- Capital Projects (5 year Summary) n Dry Fuel Storage

- Initiatives

- Steam Generators

- INPO Trend n Unit 2 Maintenance

- Visions & Values n Unit 2 Replacement

- Human Performance i

n Unit 1

- Strategic Planning

- Improvement initiatives

- Site Communications j

Refueling Outage

- Management Development l

- Goals

- Performance Monitoring &

- Scope Trending

- Different items

- Duration gg

- Exposure l

Operating Performance I

Capacity Factor

Dry Fuel Storage Annual 3 Year Avg 89.72 87.35

Steam Generators

Record Runs

Thermal Efficiency (Days)

Records Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 307 346 33 %

32%

i

1R13 - 41.8 Days 69 I

i

Dry Fuel Storage

December 4 - Started Cask Loading i

December 17 - Completed First Unit 1 Cask Loading

- 24 Unit 1 Fuel Assemblies l

- Exposure < 200 mR

- 5.1 kw Thermal i

- Extensive NRC Coverage j

4 i

70 i

b 1!:!!! !:l!

l,

)

0 1

n 0

7 0

ig 2

r r

o a

t M

l l

a a

r g

F e

n

(

4 ne g

i y1 ec g

h R

Gn u

C p2 l

a P

o R

s g

mn d

A o

n at e

e l

i i

r s

.h u

e n a

s e

vP d

t i

S a

rc e

e t

M s

v v

n 2

n k

e i

e t

i a

e a

m t

g ol v

e i

n S

S r

n e

c i

)

U u%A0 s

a s

l r

0 0

n p

u3 M8 o

e P(

D1 CR 4

Unit 2 Steam Generator Replacement

. October,1996 Received Board Approval

Purchase Steam Generators

- Letter of Intent (Westinghouse) 2/15/9~7

Replacement Contractor

- Letter of Intent (Bechtel) 4/8/97

2R12 (May,1997) Optical Templating &

Containment Walkdowns (Bechtel/PCI)

July,2000 Steam Generators Delivered

Installed in 2R14 (September, 2000) 72

i Unit 1 Steam Generator Options i

\\

i

. Alternate Repair Criteria

. Sleeve / Plug Tubes 1

. Re-roll Tubes i

One time exception to Tech Spec 4.18.5.b l

requirements requested on 4/9/97 j

73 e

t

I g

h 1996 Improvement initiatives

)

Unit 1 Unit 2 Replaced Unit 1 ADVs S/G Replacement Approval Purchased Unit 1 Main FW Control System Upgrade Transformers Reactor Building Electrical Replaced El FW Heaters Penetrations Replaced Turbine Monitoring System l

Dry Fuel Storage On-line Maintenance i

c:

o lii SAR Review l

Replace MagnaBlast Breakers U

RCP Motor Upgrades 3

Restructured Tech Specs j

i

-m

2R12

- May 9,1997 MATOR SCOPE GOALS e Refueling e

No Lost Time Accidents e S/G Inspection e

No Violations of SOPP f

e HP Turbine Upgrade e

< 110 Person Rem l

Safety e

Electrical Penetration Upgrade e No Events (any preventable i

e SW Pipe Replacement condition that significantly competitive e Circ Water Pump Repl challenges safety of plant or plant ersonel)

Di ital FWCS Installation o

8 Cost e

'D' RCP Motor Repl Operations t

h p

9 Complete Scope in < 30 Days O Complete 2R12 for < $22M 75

l1!I ifv j1l

! ! ll

i ll;!!

!l

?!i; 6

?

7 tne r

C e

s C

f r

f e

O g

i a

e d

n g

h a

t n

g Mi f

n e

o n

t n

w z

i c

a e e e

o el e

ged jP i

r a

d o

v r

n e

aF r

t g

P R

us p

i e

t o

n s OseU f

w e

e se ecd e

mlu nP r

o n

s r

eR P

a i

e U

v d

h/

e a

t e

n r

l d

o t

e nr o

a e

v uR ou i

t s

n n

t ai G Md a

i e

c e

M a

O O

e c

r ok h

cR 0

E n

r e

nS 3

COP R

W I

l Ii:

l l

5 i

a Refueling Outage Exposure i

I REM

v.. - c-, w:3.~. m p : y p,.

700__

m So.~.2 0 3

g z

. ur e Reductions eA.

612 t-n.9;dTrocess:Im,3

. p' :.

+-

.e g

n.

g e

liiel I@YiniEEedditish$provements7:

y 600 --

E3Remots~:Toolm;se/MsilS6$1ogys i

Change

%-ym:

w:

v.%ga.

- W W:., a'

m e-500__

i

_s m o - mm.

N, yCommunication Enhancerse.ntsi,..

-m ny Y

L l s'.,; L

+.

(

'.';s 400__

t 282 300 --

240 226 200 --

133 128 110 100__

i i

t 0-i 2R6 2R7 2R8 2R9 2R10 2R11 2 R 12

77

Projected 4

i i

1997 Challenges 1

i Unit 2 Steam Generators Unit 1 & 2 - Condensers Unit 1 Main Transformer l

i Unit 2 MSR Tube Replacem.ent Dry Fuel Storage XRC Design Basis A/E Inspection 1

Unit 1 & 2 - SAR Reviews / Upgrades i

1 Training Accreditation 78

?

I 5 Year Major Capital Projects l

97 98 99 00 01 02 i

Unit 1 Condenser Unit 1 Main Transfmr Unit 2 Steam Gen i

Unit 2 Condenser Unit 2 Posver Uprate Unit 2 MSR Tube Repl l

Dry Fuel Storage 79 i

i

I i

1997 Initiatives i

Materiel Condition / Housekeeping

Unit 2 Power Uprate Evaluation

Intake Structure Upgrades i

e Visions & Values

- Human Performance

- Strategic Planning i

- Site Communications j

- Management Development 1

- Performance Monitoring and Trending 80

[

Performance Indicator Status i

l Unit 1 Unit 2 1997 Goal Actual 1997 Goal Actual

]

Station Station Unit Capability Factor 85 99 41 85 96.23 Unplanned Capability Loss 3.0 0.55 3.0 3.76

)

l SCRAMS 1

0 1

0 l

i HP System Performance

.02

.00

.02

.0016 HP Heat Removal

.0007 l

System Performance

.015

.0010

.015

[

l LP (Residual Heat)

.0024 l

System Performance

.02

.00

.02 l

l Emergency AC

.00 System Performance

.025

.0066

.025 I

t

l l

l Performance Indicator Status i

1 Unit 1 Unit 2 1997 Goal Actual 1997 Goal Actual I

[

Radiation 37.5 3.253 155 3.934 Exposure r

Radwaste Generated 8460 368.0 8460 368.0 (cu ft)

Industrial Safety

.4

.0

.4

.0 l

Thermal Performance 99.5 99.84 99.5 100.0 Fuel Reliability

.0005 0001

.0005

.00008 t

i Chemistry Index 1.25 1.14 1.30 1.314 m

-m m

ANO INPO Performance Index ANO Overall INPO Perform'ance Index i

,oo oo

,oo.oo

..t..

..a..

90.00

-"qr...M..k...

m g#N 90.00

. t..

..f....

..JL..

... yp.....

y.......

3

.n

..w.

p:

....1..9...

4...

.....gm.gm pqd. e. o-o.0 -6. t H)$

y..

....}...

py-p;-amm>.nHH f..

4 80.00 80.00 g p.,,

j

.)bb N.

^

~

[,

/).4>=. f. T...

<HLq 70.00 i

70.00

..g i

60.00 60.00 ANO Site

..l.;...

---o-industry Median i

50.00 50.00 1

-. *.. IN PO Reported

(

40.00 3

40.00

[

30.00 30.00 m

m m

o e

e v

v v

v m

m m

m e

e e

e s

s 0) c)

c3 c) at g

Q Q

m Q

Q Q

9 ca c) c)

c) c3 c3 c3 m

c3 c3 l

E A

b.

C S-X "3

b.

C 5.

A g

6, d

E

,f,,

d 4

g m

e e

O e

M m

e O

m 4

m e

o g

m g

3 o

g g g i

S y

D 7

E E

M Z

7 E

E M

2 7

E E

M Z

7 E

E m

Z 7

E

b Unit 1

- INPO Performance Index ANO-1 OverallINPO Performance Index

,co,co 1 1.

4 i

90.00 90.00 a.

I

-;.;...e.

.... e --- -- '--*

80.00

4 1--

a#* ~ ~ ~ ' " * ' ' '

~'

80.00 i

/;

f e== a?= ; ?= : - ; -

r

=

i

?-*

i 4

70.00 70,00 t

f; ANO-1 60.00 go,og i

i j :

-Industry Median

--- ---INPO Reported j

50.00 50.00 i

i

+

a

+

40.00 40.00 I

l l

30.00

..'''I iii?

i i i i ii i

30.00

{

m o

m o o m

v v

m m

e e

s s

9 9

G G

G Q

G G

m G

c x 3 c

x 3 c

x a

s A

L A

2 A

$ " S $A $'

$ $A 5

$ $k$$

5 & hk$

i I

I I

Unit 2

- INPO Performance Index h

AAO-23verall INPO Performance Index l

100.00 100.00 2

j e

e

' bj.W!

^

!Vi s M:

+

i

?.

.I

+

. ! ! ! !..;. i e e...!... L e '-- -- ---

.....,?*-....*.

r 6

80.00

...,,t---+---t.-*'

80.00

. e...,.- -- -- y ;

t

+

.,e..

70.00 70.00 e

s i

60.00

. i:

ANO-2 60.00

-Industry Median

.l! !

i.

- - - - - - INPO Reported

[ '.

50.00 50.00

?

i 4

40.00 40 00 s

6 r

[

t j

c i

.s

', i 7 7 i i

i i i 30.00 i

30.00 m m m m m w

w w

w c

tn c c c c w to w w w w ~ ~

o m Q

G Q

Q O

O Q

Q G

G G

Q G

O m

Q e,

g g

l l

t

.I-x -

CL c

w X

O.,

c w

-3 Q_

c w

t i

I i

l i

I t

t I

1 l

4 i

1

(

I I

a c

C

-D y

r g

o O

o o

O o

o o

o O

e o

o O

.o

,a w

2 1

1 w z 1 1 w z

,o a

1 w

2 1

I t

-.ma.u_.

4 m -4

n s

1e.-a

.*a-*,ak...,.J.

u-.

s4-

--ma,.s--.

-s-eax,,1

>n44,a-as*""o-eu-ab--

am6uonw-.a>.o

-.a

_~s.wun.-

A

.-ana-1.an,.

I d

oo i

I i

i d

I J

i i

4 M

j O

i m

l (X3 1

i 1

e e

4 M

4 i

i I,

J 4

i i

Outage Duration Comparison Duration is a 140 -

127 Consequence of Planning 100 -

90 80 -

71 0

2R1 2R2 2R3 2R4 2R5 2R6 2R7 2R8 2R9 2R10 2R11 2R12*

87

Stretch

Outage Manhours i

Manhours 300,000 '

256,631 250,000 227,693 i

203,680 216,433 195,000 l

200,000 <

171,238 170,000 l

150,000 -

0 0--

i i

i-i

' i 2R6 2R7 2R8 2R9 2R10 2R11 2R12*

l 88

Projected l

i Outage Job Orders I

asm 32m i

\\

g.

9

. Improved Materie1 Condition 2500 -

\\

. Efficiency Gains

- Work Processes

_ Work Packages 1500 -

. Technology ImProvemen g_

i 0-M M

E E0 E1 E1T i

89 i

Projected i

i

i!:f!s ii l

l iil 0

9 s

e g

n e

l l

a h

n t

e C

d ni d

a s

g e

n aP r

I a

I e

e e

c i

c oV n

J e

a t

i m

S ro fr oF i!

i,

\\

r

Performance Indicator Index Trend i

(Grand Gulf) t 100 90 80

+

w=

v a

v s

v 25 50 40 30 90/1 91/1 92/1 93/1 94/1 95/1 96/1 97/1 YEAR /QTR

-*-Grand Gulf -o-industry Median 91

Performance Indicator Status 1

Through March 1997 YTD GOAL Capacity Factor YTD 104.90 96 (Outstanding)

Unit Capability Factor 99.50 95

[

Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 0.00 3

HPSI/ HPCS Unavailability 0.0139 0.025 l

l EFW/ RCIC Unavailability 0.0089 0.025 i

LF fi/ RHR Unavailability 0.0064 0.015 Emergency A/C 0.0146 0.025

[

Thermal Performance Index 99.70 99.5 92 l

l t

l Performance Indicator Status Through March 1997 i

t YTD GOAL f

Fuel Reliability Index 1.00 300 Chemistry Index 1.01 1.08 RadWaste Volume Generated (CuFt) 1210.40 7800 Collective Radiation Exposure 25.79 120 i

i Industrial Safety Accident Rate 0.00 0.4 i

Unplanned Scram Rate (per 7000 hrs) 0.00 1

Number of Scrams 1997 0

0 93 f

Operating Performance 1996 Safe and successful outage

- 41 day duration

- safest outage

Radiation exposure 354 Rem

- 251 Rem 3 yr rolling average

Improved Reliability

- zero automatic scrams

- capacity and generation improved j

- safety system goals met g4 I

i 1997 Challenges Integration of the new management team Sustaining strong performance j

- maintain reputation of a top industry performer

- improve overal plant reliability Motivation and continued development of staff

- management development 4

- continualimprovement

- attention to details (human performance)

Plant materiel condition

- set goal of best in class plant materiel condition 95 j

1 Key Areas of Focus l

= Safety

- overriding priority

- used to allocate resources Plant Reliability

- improve scram resiliency of plant

- Plant Reliability Committee - team / involved approach

Continuing Excellence Process 1

- focused on future improvements

- long term strategic plan to remain among the best industry performers

- development of people 96 l

Continuing Excellence Process

Process that creates focused management attention on specific issues t

Develop consensus via a process that merges both technical and managementissues

Action plans are developed that address top site i

issues j

- entire management team validates the plan I

Improves our performance in resolving issues

)

through improved communications l

l 97

Top Plant Issues CEP List ite m Strategic Area Owner improvement Culture Safety / Regulatory C. Hayes Operating Cost Materiel Condition Operating R.Moomaw Human Performance Safety / Regulatory C. Elisaesser Operating Operationally Focused Safety / Regulatory J. Venable Organization Operating 98

Maintaining A Continuing l

Improvement Culture

Goals

- Desire to continuously improve

- Effective problem identification and investigation

- Timely & effective corrective action I

Action plan i

- Root cause & corrective action program improvements

- Complacency annunciators development

- Communication plan development 99 t

l Materiel Condition Excellence

=

I Goals

- Ensure equipment operates reliably every time

- Safe and desirable work area

- Improved personnel dose & area contamination Action Plan j

- Develop material condition measurement system

- Charter materiel condition upgrade team

- Upgrade coatings, insulation, lighting &

housekeeping l

100

)

Human Performance Goals

Goals

- Sustained event free operation

- Eliminate cyclical increases in error rates

- Detection & correction of error likely situations

Action Plan i

l

- Charter action team j

- Conduct human performance training

- Identify error likely situations & prevent events 101

Persormel Development

. Individual development planning

. Management and supervisory development

. Succession planning

- Key positions j

- Development positions

- Operator & engineer " pipeline" j

102 i

Operationally Focused Organization j

Action Plan

- Conduct department meetings to identify

)

expectations

- Conduct comparative meetings among various

)

departments and identify key improvement i

items

- Develop and implement action plan for identified improvements 103

Maintaining an Operationally Focused Organization

Traits

- Maintain nuclear safety as the overriding priority in all aspects of plant operations j

- Maintain an environment of continuous 1

learning

- Monitor, measure and improve performance in all aspects of plant operations i

- Establish and implement consistently high j

standards of performance i

104

i 1997 Objectives i

i t

Establish Continuing Excellence Process as the GGXS way of doing business l

Continue plant reliability improvements

Personnel development and rotation Adoption of integrated schedule

GGXS Strategic Plan development i

(

105

Summary Overriding focus on safety

Commitment to continued development of our workforce

Commitment to Best in Class plant materiel condition i

Commitment to operating excellence

)

i 106

ll:jiI!ll S

70 E

1 IT IN dnU aTR tn E O a

e v

C P h

d m

i a

s NP G

er AO c

P Me w

MT w

c ni RN h

V h

OE o

J e

t i

FM S

R E EP V ORP M

I

i RBS Performance i

i m Overall Plant Performance m Performance Improvements i

-Reasons 5

-Results mImprovement Opportunities

)

(3P's) m Strategic Planning 108 i

t 1996 TEAMSHARING GOALS (OUTSTANDING LEVEL)

As of 12/31/96 1996 1996 GOAL ACTUAL 1.

Unit Capacity Factor 2 82.0 %

A 83.4 %

1.

Unplanned Automatic Scrams 70f 8 s1 A

0 Safety System Performance 2.

High Pressure Systems - HPCS s 0.025 A

0.007 3.

High Pressure Systems - RCIC N

s 0.020 0.001 4.

Residual Heat Removal s 0.015 A

0.002 5.

Emergency AC Power s 0.025 A

0.009 6.

Collective Radiation Exposure 345 y

393.7 7.

Industrial Safety Accident Rate per f

N 200,000 man-hours Worked (INCLUDING CONTRACTORS) g 0.40 0.36 8.

Radwaste Generated (cubic feet) s 16,986 f

9881.2

4 t,

l 1997 TEAMSHARING GOALS 1

(OUTSTANDING LEVEL) 1997 1997 As of 3/31/1997 GOAL ACTUAL 1.

Unit Capacity Factor 2 84.5%

A 100.5 %

1.

Unplanned Automatic Scrams 80f 8 g1 A

0

{

t Safety System Performance j

i 2.

High Pressure Systems - HPCS s 0.025 A

0.000 3.

High Pressure Systems - RCIC

< 0.025 0.000 A

4.

Residual Heat Removal s 0.015 A

0.002 1

5.

Emergency AC Power

< 0.025 A

0.003 6.

Collective Radiation Exposure (Man-Rem) 345 A

12.63 5

7.

Industrial Safety Accident Rate per i

'200,000 man-hours Worked (INCLUD!NG CONTRACTORS) s 0.40 0.00 u

A 8.

Radwaste Generated (cubic feet) 12,000 1036.6 l

4

Other Performance Indicators, Status Through March 1997 YTD GOAL (Outstanding)

Unit Capability Factor 98.43 %

>76.5%

Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 0.05 %

<3.0%

Thermal Performance Index 100.0 %

>99.7%

[

Fuel Reliability Index 183.3

<300 Chemistry Performance Index 1.14

<1.15 l

Unplanned Scram Rate 0

1 (per 7000 hours0.081 days <br />1.944 hours <br />0.0116 weeks <br />0.00266 months <br />) 111 I

t PLANT PERFORMANCE INDEX RIVER BEND INDUSTRY MEDIAN I

The Plant Performance Index-~is~a value--

100.0 calculated from a weighted combination of the t

WANO top nine performance indicators.

95.1 l

90.0 93 %

Performance lmprovement Plans Implemented me. M 85.0 l

l 84%

J****,.===~~~~....*,,

80.0

~

J>-

i i

Lu y

76 %

a....=*:

3

_j e

70.0 76 % **...."

i l

l as of 3/31/97 i

l uJ 60.0 -

i c3 i

~

Z j

~

50.0 _-

WANO Top Nine i

5. Collective Radiation Exposure f

1. Unit Capability Factor

6. Fuel Reliability f

40.0

2. Unit Capability Loss Factor l

7. Thermal Performance

3. Safety System Performance j

8. Chemistry Index

4. Unplanned Automatic Scrams

9. Industrial Safety Accident Rate 30.0 CUQ2CUQ5CUQ5CUQ5CUQ$CUQ5CUQ5CUQ o c c o r r,,- n u n u n n n n s t w w m m m m e w w w n n n t

maammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmma YEAR /QTR j

l a

Performance hnprovement Reasons n LTPIP a Entergy Operations, Inc.

j u Empowered Employees

- Management Processes j

- Management Oversight n Teams & Teambuilding l

n Strong Corrective Action Program n Self-Critical Assessments i

- 20 assessments in 1996, 6 so far in 1997

- Database tracks recommendations 113 i

i

- ~...

.m

i PerformanceImprovement Results m ExceIIent Materiel Condition & Housekeeping l

a High Employee Morale & Self Critical Culture 4

m Improved Availability of Safety Systems n No Unplanned Automatic Scrams After 1994 a Increased Capacity Factor n Improved Fuel Reliability 1

a 6 Awards a Refueling Outage Preparation n Reduced Dry & Liquid Radwaste 114 t

SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE UNAVAILABLE HOURS

]

RHR Diesels HPCS RCIC 1600 -

1365 1400 -

1200 Ei1000 -

2 800 -

741 j

l E

8UU ~

lkkkk.h!

'NTI 332 400 -

B:.IE j

34 15 0-j 1994 1995 1996 1997 i

i

i NET CAPACITY FACTOR Y

110 100.5 %

96.7 %

/

100 l

i 90 83.4 %

1997 GOAL 2 84.5 %

I 80 -

g GOAL 80.1 %

70 - 64.3 %

t y

59.6, ACTUAL I

i i$

60 YEAR TO DATE z

U su N s

50 l

g ROLLING AVERAGE n.

40 -

- - - -^

30 -

20 -

10 -

1993199419951996 'JAN 'FEB ' MAR 'APR 'MAY 'JUN 'JUL 'AUG 'SEP 'OCT'NOV'DEC '

1997

- -.. -.. ~ ~... ~. -... -. - ~... - -.. _ ~.. -......... -... -... ~.... ~.. _ -...... - - -.. - -. - -

i N

1 M

i M

}

4 M

\\

~C

~4

%@'.T k

i

\\

W.;$

\\

Oh

\\

mm 1

44 e

I kk m

e M

e

\\

xO A

O 5

~

w O

O m

\\

e L

Q k

A k

i

~

4

KEYIMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

\\

1 People m Learning Environment / Training m Teaming m Supervisory Effectiveness m EP m RP m Industrial Safetv l

118 i

l l

I KEYIMPROVEMENT i

OPPORTUNITIES l

Processes s PM Program

)

I m Plant Configuration Control MIST Surveillance Program j

m Effective Refueling Outages m Trending

)

m Corrective Action Program 119 Improvements l

1 KEYIMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES i

i l

Plant m ADHR Modification m ECCS Suction Strainer Modification m HVAC Chillers a Feedwater Zinc Injection m Power L prate 120 Y

l STRATEGIC PLANFOR CONTINUEDIMPROVEMENT i

m Vision Statement:

Pride of the Industry Setting the Winning Standard m Strategic Objectives (4) m Critical Success Factors (19) m Performance Measures m Employee Feedback u1 i

I

Ih!

\\

,:'l !;j\\, j ;!I il,ll ll:l 2

21 ec n

S s

i Y

t d

s nede t

R n

e s e

mu uc A

m sio s

n M

e e

n t

F v

s o

o-

_ M sCs r

n p

A t

U m

ml rnia a afoeP I

gm e

c S

c T

c i

i t

ei t

i n vg a

gr i

m3 nC noe o

f-n rt a9 rl apar r9 t

el t

D1 SSPImS n

mm n

b I

i DESIGN BASIS l

EVALUATIONS i

1 Fred Titus Vice President, Engineering 1

123 i

1 i

Recent Entergy Evaluations

\\

i i

i I

+ 50.54q'f) Evaluation i

i

+ UFSAR Evaluation l

+ Design Basis Integration Reviews 124

Design / Licensing Basis Reiationship Licensing Basis:

UFSAR i

SERs

Commitment Letters Regulatory i

Design Design Basis input Documents (Engineering Design Basis)

Design Analysis Doc:(1)

CALCS Analysis (1) NOTE:

Some analysis and output documents are Design Output Doc: (1) also directly in the Drawings UFSAR EQ List CDB 125

[

Design Basis Integration l

UFSAR r

?

Plant.

\\

c.

. Programs Design Procedures l

Change Chinge 3gg

50.54(f) Evaluation Approach i

+ Management Direction: Self-Critical Review

+ Peer Team Developed Approach

+ Scope:

> Critical Review of Site Processes

> Evaluate Process Completeness i

> Evaluate Process Effectiveness

> Significant Effort at Each Site l

127 o

h 50.54(f) Evaluation Focus UFSAR i

Plant:

. Programs Design Procedures j

Chinge Chinge 128 l

UFSAR Evaluation I

i

+ Preceded 50.54(f} Evaluation

+ Core team evaluated each Site l

+ Focus:

i

> SAR Alignment with Plant Operations

> SAR Update Process j

i 129 i

t

L UFSAR Review Focus i

i l

UFSAR 1

I Plant:

Programs Design

. Procedures i

i Chinge Chinge 130 l

Design Basis Integration Review

+ Peer Team Reviews at Each Site

+ Approach:

> Review discrete subfunctional areas

> Review prior Assessments /CRs/ Findings

> Interviews

> independent Expert Perspective

+ Focus:

> Congruence of Design /SAR/ Plant

> Completeness / Depth of Design Basis Documentation 131

Design Basis Review Focus UFSAR Plant:

l

Programs Design

Procedures l

Change Change

> Design Basis Ownership / Accountability 132 r

I

Overall Conclusions

=

+ Design /SAR/ Plant Alignment Good in Most Areas

+ As-Built Configuration Good

+ Strong Technical Competence j

+ Good Accountability / Ownership of Design Basis

+ Appropriate Processes in Place

+ Site Improvement Initiatives:

j

> Several Common Areas j

> Also, Several Site Unique Areas 133 l

)

__.._m-__

-m.

_m.-.

.,m

.__......... _ _ - -..-=-_... _

m..

.. ~..

m_.____m v

hi i

Results i

f I

i i

Design Basis Summary i

t 2 10

$ik i

Minor Enhancements or Less g Scope:

@ l]!=.gly a.

Scope: Focused improveme nt Initiatives j

o t

c2.

U I

Functional Area Subfunctional Area 1

Process & Knowledge Areas Acco unta bility, Owne rship Technical C om petence Retrievability oTUB'D Calculation C ros's Reference System Criteria Documents (Us'dbilily)~

A's'BiillFC ERalilon Configuration Managemsnt Process l

Design Process Control

~

USAM!Tdisiface wTth~lhi Plant

~~-

l

^~

l

' USAR -lnterface with the Design i

Plant Procedure Review (Interface)

Operations Interfaces

~~~

Technic 51 S pecificatiori M aintenance Interfaces'

~ '

~

'~

C omp6nent D stabase

~

i

~

\\/ e nd o r M a nual-~ ~~ - ~~---

Electrical P6wer ~

~

~~ '~

Dsgride'd Voltage ~

^

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

}

~

i Distilbution Systems

~ ~ ~

- - -~~~

f Ele 6trica lP ro te clid rff C o o rd in dlidii

.DC ElectrlEat Pr6tection / Codrdination~ ~

~ '

~ ~

~

t Station Blackout l,

[

i t

I Results (Cont'd.)

i i

Design Basis Summary j

4 l

slg>

o o

Minor Enhancements or Less O

g Scope:

=

2 Scope: Focused improvement initiatives o

j Functional Area Subfunctional Area

" lI I

I I

j Chapter 15 Accident Events Containment, $Lbcompartment HELB ~

PS A/P RA

~

Radiological C onsequences

~

-~

instrumentation and Controls BOPl&C

~ - - -

l

-~

NSSSlaC

-- ~

Instrument Setpoints',lleg. GUTde 1.97

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

E mergency Feedwater IniilstI6n7 Control NA NA Building Structural Design and Analysis Block Walls

~ ~ - -

Heavy Loads / Temporary RI5ging

- ~~

Loading Reconciliation I

l J

Building Penetrations (Interfaces)

~~

- ' ~ ~

Seismic ~ Design

{

S ettlement S urvey l

Seismic Qualification l

Core Design and Reload Analysis Core Design l

~ ~ - -

' Reload Analysis f

Equipment Qualification Environmental Qualification FIFE Protection Systems Fire Protection / Elect. Separafion 135 l

I i

f i

l

)

t Results (Cont'd.)

Design Basis Summary a

o i :E 2*

Minor Enhancements or Less y

g g Scope:

m 3,

Scope: Focused improvement initiatives o

o.

I Functional Area Subfunctional Area l

l l

Mechanical System Design Mechanical System Calculation Review

~

C heck Valve ~'

~

Containmenilsdishon EFW- ~-~ ~ -~

~

FiisTP'5al~ Cooling

~

-~H\\ TAC'ChilfWater &~ Standby GssTrssidi~ent

-. -~

Instrumsnt and Servics~ Air'(Compressed Air)~'

~

IST MDV

~~

~ ^ ^ ~ ~

~

'~~

Rblisf Valvs~ ~~~

^

~ ~ ~ ' ~

~

~S e rvice Wate r (No rmalT SissdbyTTU H S PIpihg tisilgn

. Analysis Classl,~ll,~llt

~

~~'

Codss &' Standards

~

~}illIS~eismic Classifiestion

~

IPIps Supports

~ ~ ~

~

Site ParametArs' ~

~- ~ ~ '

~ lChb~niical, EEplosion'& Environmentalissises

' Flooding

~ ~~

~~

Torns'do Protedtion

I Did We Learn AnythingNew?

+ YES - Many Xew Insights

+ Rethink Priority / Resource Strategy

+ Xew Improvement Areas Identified:

i

> Need for Calculation Cross Indexing

> Plant Procedure Review Enhancement

> Heavy Load Controls 137 l

s

On-GoingActions

+ EOI Committed to Making Identified Improvements I

+ ManyImprovementInitiatives Already i

Underway t

[

+ Each Site Developing More Irdegrated Long-Term Plans l

138 i

2

f

.I 6

h Compliance and the Regulatory Environment t

b Ellis Merschoff t

Region IV Administrator 1

139

~

r l

- - -

ML20141K820

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

Enclosures:

Purpose:

Navigation menu

ML20141K820

Text

SUBJECT:

Enclosures:

Purpose:

Navigation menu

Search