|
---|
Category:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISALS
MONTHYEARML20141E0951997-06-19019 June 1997 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Order Under 10CFR50.80 Approving Application Concerning Corporate Restructuring of Enova Corp,Parent Company of Sdge ML20058E3421993-11-12012 November 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi in Consideration of Issuance of Exemption from 10CFR50.120 ML20207K1641988-09-26026 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Temporary Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements ML20205S1661986-06-0505 June 1986 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Operation of shutdown-related Sys That Do Not Meet 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Requirements by Providing Equivalent Protection 1997-06-19
[Table view] Category:TEXT-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217K8581999-10-21021 October 1999 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 990925,unusual Fish Kill Was Discovered That Consisted Predominately of Yellow Fin Croaker.Caused by Increased Temp in Intake Structure.Util Is Modifying Heat Treat Process to Reduce Possible Fish Kill ML13319A8711998-12-31031 December 1998 SONGS Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998. ML20248D6211998-05-28028 May 1998 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 980304,sewage Treatment Effluent Indicated 5.0 Ml/L for Settleable Solids.Caused by Elevated Solids in Plant Combined W/Excessive Flows from Frequent Storms.Samples Taken Later Were within NPDES Limit ML20149J7881997-06-30030 June 1997 Analysis of Time Required to Evacuate Transient & Permanent Population from Various Areas within Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone,San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Update for 1996-2002 ML20141E0951997-06-19019 June 1997 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Issuance of Order Under 10CFR50.80 Approving Application Concerning Corporate Restructuring of Enova Corp,Parent Company of Sdge ML20137X5201997-04-14014 April 1997 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 970219,Unit 1 Sewage Treatment Effluent Exceeded Instantaneous NPDES Limit of 3.0 Ml/L.Three Exceedances of Weekly Average Effluent Limit of 1.5 Ml/L Also Reported ML20135F5451997-03-0707 March 1997 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 970113,sample Obtained on Unit 1 Sewage Treatment Effluent Indicated Setteable Solids Value of 3.5 Ml/L Which Was Above Instantaneous Limit of 3.0 Ml/L.Caused by Operator Error.Terminated Operator ML20134F0411996-12-31031 December 1996 1996 Offsite Hazards Update ML20116B2701996-05-31031 May 1996 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Repts for May 1996 for SONGS Units 1 & 2 ML20115B1771996-05-29029 May 1996 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 960420,release of 22,440 Gallons of Water with Ph 12.6 from High Flow Makeup Demineralizer (Hfmud) Waste Neutralization Tank Occurred,As Specified in Title 22 of State of CA Code of Regulations ML20115B1661996-05-29029 May 1996 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 960420,release of 22,440 Gallons of Water with Ph of 12.6 from High Flow Makeup Demineralizer (Hfmud) Waste Neutralization Tank Occurred,As Specified in Title 22 of State of CA Code of Regulations ML20115B8901996-04-30030 April 1996 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Unit 3 for Apr 1996 ML20115B8791996-04-30030 April 1996 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Apr 1996 ML20080M0841995-01-27027 January 1995 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 941202,chlorination Sys Exceeded Two H Per Day Limit for Total Residual Oxidants Due to Improper Timer Setting & on 941219,sewage Line Upset Occurred South of Holddown Area Due to Blockage in Line ML20072D0501994-08-0505 August 1994 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 940528,low-vol Waste Stream Not Ph Neutralized as Required During Release from High Flow Makeup Demineralizer Waste Neutralization Tank. Station Procedures Will Be Modified ML20059L1461993-12-30030 December 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:During Records Review, Discovered That Method Used to Determine Total Residuial Chlorine for Month of Oct Dpd Colorimetric Method.Actions Taken to Ensure Amperometric Method Used in Future ML20059L1501993-12-30030 December 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:During Records Review, Discovered That Method Used to Determine Total Residual Chlorine for Month of Nov Dpd Colorimetric Method.Actions Taken to Ensure Amperometric Method Used in Future ML20058E3421993-11-12012 November 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi in Consideration of Issuance of Exemption from 10CFR50.120 ML20057A7451993-09-0808 September 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 930608,aqueous Film Forming Foam Inadvertently Released to Unit 1 Yard Drain Sump from Test Conducted.Yard Drain Sump Isolated & Treated W/Approx 10 Gallons of Defoaming Agent ML20045G5531993-06-0202 June 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification for Apr 1993 for SONGS, Unit 2.Discrepancy in Analytical Technique Used to Determine Total Residual Chlorine Concentration.Amperometric Titration Method for Total Residual Chlorine Analysis Reinstated ML20127N6251993-01-18018 January 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 921002,release of Water from Full Flow Condensate Polish Demineralizer Exceeded Max Concentration Limit of 100 Ppm.Caused by Valving Misalignment.Procedural Changes Implemented ML20127L5131993-01-18018 January 1993 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 920108,14,15, & 16 Ph Was Low at 5.4,5.2,5.2 & 5.9,respectively Due to Plant Going Through Nitrification State Which Causes Acid Production. Operational Controls Implemented ML20127N1691992-11-20020 November 1992 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 920825,total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Combined Discharge Exceeded Permit Limitation.Resample Analysis on Same Day & Subsequent TRC Measurements Have Been within Limits ML20127N1601992-11-20020 November 1992 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 920814,26 & 27,pH for Mesa Treatment Plant Permit Limitations of 6 to 9 Exceeded as Result of Treatment Plant Going Through Nitrification State.New Operational Controls Implemented ML20114D8481992-09-0101 September 1992 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 920616,total Residual Chlorine Concentration Measured at 300 ug/1.Caused by Improper Setting on Metering Pump.Pump Reset.On 920618,total Suspended Solids Exceeded Permit Limit of 100 mg/1 ML20090E2911992-02-28028 February 1992 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 911218,during Discharge of Full Flow Condensate Polishing Demineralizer Sump,Total Suspended Solids Exceeded Instantaneous Value of NPDES Permit.Extensive Cleanup of Sump Conducted ML20087B8411992-01-10010 January 1992 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 911116,circulating Water Differential Temp Exceeded 20 F Limit by 1 F.Caused by Limitation of Model Used to Predict Allowable Operating Temps.Procedure Changed ML20066F3471991-01-14014 January 1991 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 901124,daily Discharge Chlorine Residual Exceeded Limit.Chlorine Injection Pump Adjusted and Residual Returned within Limits on 901125 ML20059H9001990-09-0606 September 1990 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 900711 & 27,sewage Treatment Plant Effluent Sample Found Outside NPDES Permit Limit.Caused by Reduction in Flow,Resulting in Long Detention Times.Plant Corrected by Using Smaller Trains ML20235W1181988-12-31031 December 1988 Annual Personnel Monitoring Rept,1988 ML20155C7081988-09-29029 September 1988 NPDES Monitoring Rept for Aug 1988.All Sampled Water Sources within Permit Limits Except One Settleable Solids Test at Sewage Treatment Plant ML20207K1641988-09-26026 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Temporary Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements ML20154G5751988-09-12012 September 1988 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 880706,sampled Water Sources Exceeded Chlorination Limits.Chlorination Stopped. Chemical Pumps Reset & Testing Following Day Noted within Limits ML20155A4461988-06-0202 June 1988 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 880424,circulating Water Delta Temp Exceeded Daily Average by 1 Degree.Caused by Heat Treatment on Unit 2 Saltwater Cooling Discharge Which Was Lined Up to Unit 3 Intake.Procedures Changed ML20196J9491988-03-0303 March 1988 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 880117-26,BPS Sump Discharge High in Total Suspended Solids.Evaluation/Mod of Procedures in Progress to Prevent Recurrence ML20148R8251988-02-0808 February 1988 NPDES Permit CA0001228, Monitoring & Reporting Program 88-001, Issued to Southern California Edison Co ML20154G8931987-12-31031 December 1987 Revised Personnel Whole Body Exposures for CY87 & Personnel Monitoring Rept & Notification Summary for 1987,per Reg Guide 1.16 ML20214U1061987-06-0303 June 1987 NPDES Monitoring Rept for Apr 1987.Low Vol Waste High in Average Grease & Oil.Maint of Sys Performed.Mesa Sewage Effluent Low in Average Ph Due to Low Flows.Chemical Adjustment of Ph Performed ML20207R6401987-03-11011 March 1987 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 870102,Unit 3 Oily Waste Separator High in Grease & Oil.Separator Removed from Svc for Cleaning & Repair.During Jan,Unit 1 Low Vol Waste Stream Also High in Grease & Oil.Oil Removed from Separator ML20209G2701987-01-30030 January 1987 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 861227,Delta T High (21 F) Following Heat Treatment.Changes in Operating Practices Implemented to Prevent Recurrence ML20211B9541986-10-0202 October 1986 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 860802 & 03,length of Heat Treatment & Combined Discharge Delta T Not within Permit Limits,Respectively.Cause Identified & Procedures Changed to Prevent Recurrence ML20205S1661986-06-0505 June 1986 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Operation of shutdown-related Sys That Do Not Meet 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G Requirements by Providing Equivalent Protection A000122, Addendum 2 to Order 82-14 to NPDES Permit CA0001228,revising Order 82-14 to Reflect Change in Max Allowable Sewage Treatment Plant Flow for Facility,Issued to Southern California Edison Co1986-05-14014 May 1986 Addendum 2 to Order 82-14 to NPDES Permit CA0001228,revising Order 82-14 to Reflect Change in Max Allowable Sewage Treatment Plant Flow for Facility,Issued to Southern California Edison Co ML20137R0351986-01-31031 January 1986 Fes Update ML20199F6471985-12-31031 December 1985 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1985, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1,2 & 3 ML20099F9131984-12-31031 December 1984 Semiannual Effluent Rept for Jul-Dec 1984 ML20098H3491984-06-30030 June 1984 Semiannual Effluent Rept,Jan-June 1984 ML20084N8541984-04-27027 April 1984 Submits Const Monitoring & Reporting Program for Jan-Mar 1984.No Discharge Occurred During Time Period ML20092B0931983-12-31031 December 1983 Semiannual Effluent Rept Jul-Dec 1983 ML20083B4161983-06-30030 June 1983 Semiannual Effluent Rept,Jan-June 1983 1999-10-21
[Table view] |
Text
. . _ . - .. _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
.^ -
l 7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION. UNIT NOS. 1. 2 AND 3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY l SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY i
l THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA
! THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA DOCKET NOS. 50-206. 50-361. AND 50-362 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
, The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering l the issuance of an order under 10 CFR 50.80 approving an application concerning the corporate restructuring of Enova Corporation, parent company of San Diego Gas and Electric Company (the co-licensee), co-holder of Possession
( Only License No. DPR-13, and Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15, along with Southern California Edison Company, The City of Riverside, California, and The City of Anaheim, California (the co-licensees) issued for operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), Units 1, 2, and 3, located in San' Diego County, California.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would consent to the transfer of control of the licenses to the extent effected by the proposed restructuring of Enova Corporation (Enova), parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), whereby Enova would combine with Pacific Enterprises (Pacific), with i each becoming a subsidiary of a newly created holding company, Mineral Energy i
(
Company (New Holding Company). SDG&E would continue to be a wholly-owned i
9706300213 970619 PDR P ADOCK 05000206 pop
^
subsidiary of Enova and would continue to be a co-licensee of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3. The proposed action is in accordance with the request made by SDGE through its counsel Richard A.
Meserve of Covington & Burling in a letter dated December 2,1996.
The Need for the Prooosed Action The proposed action is required to enable Enova to restructure as described above. Enova and Pacific have submitted that restructuring will improve their ability to compete in the rapidly evolving energy marketplace. l Environmental Imoacts of the Prooosed Action The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed corporate i
restructuring and concludes that there will be no physical or operational '
changes to SONGS. The corporate restructuring will not affect the qualifications or organizational affiliation of the personnel who operate the ,
l facilities, as SDG&E will continue to be responsible for its portion of the operation of SONGS, Units 1, 2 and 3. !
The Commission has evaluated the environmental impact of the proposed actionandhasdeterginedthattheprobabilityorconsequencesofaccidents would not be increased by the restructuring, and that post-accident radiological releases would not be greater than previously determined.
Further, the Commission has determined that the corporate restructuring would not affect routine radiological plant effluents and would not increase occupational radiological exposure. Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the restructuring would not affect nonradiological plant effluents and would have no other
_3_
environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiciogical environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Alternative to the Proposed Action Since the Comission concluded that there are no significant environmental effects that would result from the proposed action, any alverrative with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be evaluated.
The principal alternative would be to deny the requested action. Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts.
The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are identical.
Alternative Use of Resources This action does not involve the use of any resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statements for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1, dated October 1973, and the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, dated April 1981, and its Errata dated June 5, 1981. t i
Aaencies and Persons Contacted In accordance with its stated policy, on May 29, 1997, the staff consulted with the California State official, Mr. Steve Hsu of t;.4 Radiologic Health Branch of the State Department of Health Services, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
Findina of No Sionificant Imoact Based upon the environmental :ssessment, the Commission concludes that i the proposed action will not L. ave a significant effect on the qualf ty of the
l ..
-4 human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the letter dated December 2,1996, by Richard A. Meserve of Covington & Burling (Counsel for SDG&E), which is available for public inspection at the Commissian's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at the Main Library, University of California, Irvine, California.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of June 1997.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s J 'If F A Yi Mel B. Fields, Project Kanager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation G
S I