ML20141C041
| ML20141C041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/14/1997 |
| From: | Joseph Holonich NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Rael G ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| REF-WM-62 NUDOCS 9705160117 | |
| Download: ML20141C041 (23) | |
Text
.
---~-
L e %q k
a' UNITED STATES E
4y~>
0 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '
I f
t WASHINGTON, D.C, 20555-0001
...../
y May 14, 1997 l
l l
t Mr. George Rae, virector U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office l
ERD /UMTRA P.O. Box 5400-Albuquerque. NM 87185-5400 i
SUBJECT:
VICINIT', PROPERTY COMPLET!ON REPORT FOR.THE RIFLE. COLORADO, VICINITY PROPERTY NUMBER RF-103
Dear Mr. Rael:
The U.S. Nuclear-Regulatory Commission staff has completed its review of the Jage changes submitted by.the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by letter dated r bruary 11, 1997, in response to NRC comments on the Vicinity Property e
Com)letion Report (CR) for vicinity property RF-103 (south of Highway 6 West) i in 11fle Colorado.
NRC concurrence with this CR is required because DOE applied supplemental standards to the remediation of this vicinity property.
Supplemental standards were applied in order to leave tailings contamination (approximately 1417 cubic yards over 8485 square yards) under, and out to 15 feet from railroad tracks owned by the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad (a portion of the mainline and six spur lines).
Since complete remediation would have required the removal and replacement of 3180 feet of track in order i
to excavate the contaminated material., the railroad would not allow remediation of those areas.
DOE based the application of supplemental standards on criteria a and c of 40 CFR 192.21 because of the owner's concerns and the hazardous conditions for remediation workers. and because the estimated remedial cost would be high conside ig the potential use of this portion of the property.
- For the remediated portion of the property, none of the verification soil samples recorded exceed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for Ra-226 in soil.
Interior contamination was removed from beneath 1
shed #2. As a result, working level and gamma radiation (uR/hr) limits, as L
required by 40 CFR 192.12(b)(2), wem achieved.
}
Based on its review of the CR and the information provided in DOE's response to comments, the NRC staff concurs that DOE's remediation of the vicinity
' Review Form for Supplemental Certification of Vicinit property, which includes the application of sup)lemental standards, was appropriate and was completed in accordance wit1 the EPA Standards.
The NRC l
j NRC concurrence, is enclosed.
(
9705160117 970514
[
PDR WASTE t
RETURN TO REGULATORUENTRAL ffLES l
f7-Yr
l G. Rael.
t NRC concurrence was not obtained for the Radiological Engineering Assessment (REA) for RF-103. even though supplemental standards were planned.
To bring l
closure to this issue. NRC staff is also using this letter to provide concurrence on the REA for RF-103.
If you have any questions concerning this letter. please contact the NRC Project Manager Janet Lambert at (301) 415-6710.
Sincerely.
(Original signed by)
Joseph J. Holonich. Chief Uranium Recovery Branch Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
S. Arp. DOE Alb J. Virgona. DOE GJP0 S. Hamp. DOE Alb E. Artiglia. TAC Alb DISTRIBUTION w/ Enc 1.
File Center NMSS r/f t,.'" r/f URBr/f ACNW l
PUBLIC Cain.RIV EBrummett BMackin/CNWRA w/o Enc 1.-
MFederline DOCUMENT NAME:
S:DWM\\ urb \\ja1\\rifl03.vp2 0FC U$
URB O,f C
URB ia/
NAME J'LMmdert DGil E JHpkich N/ld97 DATE 5/13 / 9 7 5/13/97 H
0FFICIAL RECORD COPT
l VP No.: RF-103 l
.c NRC Review Form L,
for Supplemental Certification of Vicinity Properties 4
1 1
The Department of Energy (DOE) has dejermined that the remedial action at the following i
vicinity property (VP) has been completed and thereby complies with supplemental standards invoked by DOE under 40 CFR, Subpart C, specifically Subsections 192.21 and 192.22.
[ X)
NRC concurrence for the Radiological Engineering Assessment (REA) given on:
Note: NRC cor:currence was not obtained although supplemental. standards were applied.
[]
Supplemental standards were not in the REA, special circumstances required that suppleme t standards be 'nvolved during remedial action.
FE.B 1 1 E Steven C. Hamp, DOE Certifida' tion Officer Date
~
==============================
Based on the information and certification provided by the DOE, the NRC:
(]
concurs that the remedial action at the subject VP has been completed under its authority provided by the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA),
Section 104(f)(1) and as described in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU),
Appendix A, Section 3.4.
[]
concurs, as above, except for the following conditions:
1 1.
2.
3.
() See attached sheets for any additional provisions.
[]
needs additionalinformation to make a concurrence decision. This information consists of:
[ ] See attached sheets for any additional informational needs.
NRC Concurring Official and Title Date l
.