ML20140G851

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-354/97-01 on 970414
ML20140G851
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/1997
From: Linville J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Eliason L
Public Service Enterprise Group
References
50-354-97-01, 50-354-97-1, NUDOCS 9706170107
Download: ML20140G851 (3)


See also: IR 05000354/1997001

Text

. _ . . _ .

- _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ - .

.___

l'-

.

.

June 12, 1997

l

i

i

'

Mr. Leon R. Eliason

Chief Nuclear Officer and President

Nuclear Business Unit

l

Public Service Electric & Gas Company

>

Post Office Box 236

!

Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038

l

i

l

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION NOS. 50-354/97-01

l

l

.

l

Dear Mr. Eliason-

I

!

I

This letter refers to your May 13,1997 correspondence, in response to our April 14,1997

i

letter.

.

l

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive acdans documented in your

l

l

letter regarding the evaluation, control and tracking of temperary tcaffolding in your Hope

Creek facility. To date, your immediate actions appear to be er ctive. However, these

actions will be examined further during future inspections at Hope Creek.

l

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

.

Sincerely,

,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

!

James C. Linville, Chief

,

l

Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

'

'

Docket No.

50-354

/

'

,

l

l

,

!,

, , f h,hfffh

"

9706170107 970612

PDR

ADOCK 05000354

G

PM

!

..

f,

I

,

,

,

.

c.

'

Mr. L. Eliason

2

cc:

<

'

L. Storz, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations

E. Simpson, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

E. Salowitz, Director - Nuclear Business Support

M. Bezilla, General Manager - Hope Creek Operations

.

J. McMahon, Director - Quality Assurance & Nuclear Safety Review

D. Powell, Manager - Licensing and Regulation

A. C. Tapert, Program Administrator

L. G. Canton, Regional Director, FEMA, Region 11 (EP Exercise /lRs Only)

l

cc w/ copy of licensee letter:

A. F. Kirby, Ill, External Operations - Nuclear, Delmarva Power & Light Co.

J. A. Isabella, Manager, Joint Generation

Atlantic Electric

R. Kankus, Joint Owner Affairs

Jeffrey J. Keenan, Esquire

M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire

Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate

William Conklin, Public Safety Consultant, Lower Alloways Creek Township

.

'

State of New Jersey

State of Delaware

I

i

I

.

l

V

I

I

!

!

._, ,

. _ _

_

_ _

. . _ .

.

. - .

.__

_

. _

_-.

- _ _ .

.

._

.

. _ _ . . _ . _ _

-

l

'

.

.

l

Mr. L. Eliason

3

l

l

Distribution w/ copy of licensee letter:

l

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

l

K. Gallagher, DRP

l

D. Screnci, PAO

J. Linville, DRP

S. Barber, DRP

,

l

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

W. Dean, OEDO

D. Jaffe, Project Nianager, NRR

l

J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

'

l

R. Correia, NRR

!

F. Talbot, NRR

l

DOCDESK

PUBLIC

i

I

l

l

l

t

i

l

!

i

I

l

l

l

DOCUMENT NAME:g:\\ BRANCH 3\\REPLYLTR.HC

To receive e copy of this document, indicate in the box: 'C" = Copy without ettechment/ enclosure

  • E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure

"N ~ = No copy

OFFICE

Rl:DRP

_j

l

l

NAME

JLinvilley

i

DATE

64g/97

'

i

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

,

J

_

_.._.~--._ - __

-.

. . . . , . . - . - -

- . . - - - - . . .

. - -

- - . . - - . .

-.

. .-

  • '

.

. , ,

l

'

l

.

,

Pubhc Service

!

Electne and Gas

Company

Louis F. Storr

Public Service Electric and Gac Company

P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge. NJ 08038

609-339-5700'

i

s.a ve. n o m. m .,on.,

.

MAY 13 1997

.

LR-N970290

l

United States Nuclear-Regulatory Commission

i

Document Control Desk

i

Washington, DC

20555

l

l

\\

'

REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION

INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-354/97-01

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

l

FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-57

j'

DOCKET No. 50-354

Ladies & Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201, Public Service

Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) hereby submits a reply to

,

the notice of violation (NOV) issued to the Hope Creek

Generating Station in a letter dated April 14, 1997.

The

details of the reply are contained in the attachments to

i

this letter.

t

Should you have any questions or comments on this

j

transmittal, do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

'

l

v6

!

(.08

l

Attachment

!

}

k

Printed on

l 4%bmx

.

-

--

..

.

.

-

.

_ . _ . _ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . .

.

.

Document Control Desk

-2-

LR-N970290

.

C

Mr. H. J.-Miller, Administrator - Region I

U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

Mr. D.,Jaffe, Licensing Project Manager - Hope Creek

-

U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

One White Flint North

'11555 Rockville Pike

Mail Stop 14E21

j

Rockville, MD 20852

I

l

Mr. R. Summers

i

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector (X24)

Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV

Bureau of Nuclear Engineering

33 Arctic Parkway

CN 415

Trenton, NJ

08625

!

l

,

i

'

.

i

4

i

l

l

. . _ ,

. , . _-

-

_

_

. _ _

. . - ,

,. -

-

-

_ . _ .

. _ _ . _ _ . . _ __ _ . . _ _ _ .

. . . _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . .

_ _ _ .

. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ _

.

.

.

.

.

.

l

REF:

LR-N970290

,

STATE OF NEW JERSEY )

l

SS.

'

COUNTY OF SALEM

}

Louis F.

Storz, being duly sworn according to law deposes and

says:

I am Sr. Vice President Nuclear Operations of Public Service

Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set

forth in the above referenced letter, concerning the Hope Creek

Generating Station, are true to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief.

l

l

,8

1

l

Subscribed and Sworn before me

this /g fh

day of

h_

1997

,

l

't

C

i

' Ann b f e

~

GWm

.

11

-

,

e

Woary'Publifof[ewOersey

l

KIMBERLY JD BROWN

l

NOTARY PUBllC 0F NEW JEREEY

l

My commission expires on

My Commission Enites April 21,1998

!

!

i

,

4

t

-

_ .

._

.

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

. _ . - ___ ._, _ . .

_.

_ _ _ _ _

-

,

.

,

!

l

.

ATTACHMENT 1

SCAFFOLDING DEFICIENCIES

INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-354/97-01

HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION

DOCKET NO. 50-354

LR-N970290

I.

DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATICN

i

The description of the violation contained in the notice of

violation received in the April 14, 1997 letter is as

follows:

l

A.

Violation

"10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V requires in part that

activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in

accordance with established procedures.

These procedures

~

shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative

acceptance criteria.

!

l

l

PSE&G Nuclear Administrative Procedure NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0023 (Q),

,

Revision 4, " Scaffolding and Transient Loads Control,"

l

requires that scaffolding installed in the (Hope Creek)

i

station be appropriately tracked in a control log,

l

periodically inspected for compliance with construction

criteria, and promptly removed after completion of the work

activity requiring the scaffolding.

Contrary to the above, on February 26, 1997, it was

determined that several scaffolds installed in safety-

related areas, including the "A"

and

"B" RHR pump rooms and

the standby liquid control pump room in the reactor building

of the Hope Creek station lacked appropriate construction

documentation, had insufficient periodic inspections, and

were not removed within a timely manner following the work

activities that required the temporary structures.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I)."

II.

REPLY TO VIOLATION

A.

PSE&G Position

PSE&G agrees with the violation.

B.

Reason for the Violation

.

Procedure NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0023 (Q) , Scaffolding and Transient

-

Loads Control, provides detailed guidelines for scaffold

d

I

'

Page 1 of 4

. __

.

. __

_

_ . _ _

_

_.

_ _ _

. _ . . _

..

_

4

.

.

.

.

Attachm2nt 1

LR-N970290

Response to Scaffolding Violation

,

erection to satisfy the requirements for seismic II/I, fire

protection, ventilation, and industrial safety.

Recent

scaffolding walkdowns identified deviations from NC.NA-

AP . Z Z-0023 (Q) , including:

insufficient periodic

inspections, inadequate documentation for variances,

'

untimely removal of scaffolding, and incorrect scaffold

.

'

logs.

i

!

Based upon review of the failures to adhere to NC.NA-AP.ZZ-

l

0023 (Q) and review of the procedure and associated training,

i

the cause of the failure to comply with the procedure is

>

inadequate design and monitoring of the scaffolding program.

'

Lack of program ownership in addition to inadequate training

l

resulting in human errors also contributed to the violation.

l

With regard to inadequate design of the program, the

instructions for installation and removal of scaffolding are

contained in an upper-tier administrative procedure that

!

controls both scaffolding and transient loads.

The

combination of these two factors resulted in a cumbersome

and unclear procedure.

With regard to inadequate training, personnel involved in

the installation and removal of scaffolding are provided

with only 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of a combination of classroom and hands on

training.

Because there are no qualification requirements

for personnel involved with scaffolding, not all personnel

performing the work had received training.

!

With regard to inadequate monitoring of the program, a

method or requirement to audit the scaffold control log and

the periodic inspections on a recurring basis did not exist

and therefore audits were not performed.

l

l

As a result of the deficient procedure, inadequate training,

and lack of program ownership, adherence to the procedure

'

was not consistent.

Periodic inspections were not performed

as required, forms were not completed as required, and

3

scaffolding was not removed in a timely manner following

'

completion of work activities.

C.

Corrective Steps That Have Been Taken or Are Ongoing

and Results Achieved

1.

Equipment operability concerns resulting from seismic

proximity problems with scaffolding installed in the

i

'A'

and

'B'

Residual Heat Removal pump rooms were

'

resolved.

>

.

Page 2 of 4

l

i

  • ,-

l

.

.

.

.

Attschment 1

LR-N970290

Response to Scaffolding Violation

.

2.

The scaffolding installed in the Standby Liquid Control

pump room has been inspected and the appropriate NC.NA-

AP . ZZ-0023 (Q) documentation has been completed.

3.

Actions have been taken to ensure that the scaffolding

currently installed in seismic controls areas is

supported by the appropriate NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0023 (Q)

documentation and has current inspections.

<

4.

Scaffolding supporting completed work activities has

been evaluated for removal.

5.

A single organization has been appointed as owner of

the scaffold program.

6.

Meetings were conducted with Hope Creek Maintenance,

Civil Design Engineering and Nuclear Operations

Services personnel to discuss the seismic II/I

requirements of NC.NA-AP. ZZ-0023 (Q) .

7.

Procedure adherence expectations were re-emphasized to

the Civil Engineering Group.

8.

Procedure adherence expectations are being re-

emphasized during the Hope Creek Maintenance

Intervention, which began on April 21, 1997.

D.

Corrective Steps That Will Bo Taken to Avoid Further

Violations

1.

Interim guidance for scaffold use and control will be

communicated to appropriate departments by May 16,

1997.

This guidance is consistent with, but in

addition to, NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0023 (Q) .

2.

Scaffolding installed in high radiation areas will be

inspected based upon ALARA concerns.

!

3.

Scaffolding deemed acceptable to be removed will be

removed by May 23, 1997.

Scaffolding removal in high

radiation areas will be based upon ALARA concerns.

l

l

4.

To address the cause of inadequate program design and

j

monitoring, the Scaffolding and Transient Loads Control

Procedure, NC.NA-AP. ZZ-0023 (Q) , will be revised by July

,

15, 1997.

The revised procedure will continue to

control scaffolding and will address the timeliness

issue discussed in this violation.

The control of

Page 3 of 4