ML20140B078

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Draft Proposed Amends to 10CFR2 Based on Recommendations Provided in SECY-81-20D Re Policy on Proceeding W/Pending CP & Mfg License Applications.Comments Should Be Submitted by 810829
ML20140B078
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/21/1981
From: Bickwit L
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140B076 List:
References
FRN-46FR18045, REF-10CFR9.7, RULE-PR-2, TASK-RIA, TASK-SE SECY-81-020E, SECY-81-20E, NUDOCS 8109100313
Download: ML20140B078 (7)


Text

_

e* "ov g

August 21, 1981 SECY-81-20E w.

RULEMAKING ISSUE (Affirmation)

L The Commission For:

Leonard Bickwit, Jr., General Counsel From:

h SECY-81-20D - POLICY ON PROCEEDING WITH PENDING Subiect:

CP AND MANUFACTURING LICENSE APPLICATIONS The preamble to the draf t final rule in SECY-81-20D r

Discussion:

includes the following (pg. 31 of Enclosure 3):

In the Notice of Rulemaking (46 FR 18045) published on March 23, 1981, under Substance of the Rule, the Commission stated, "It is the Commission's view that this new rule, together with the existing regulations, form a set of regulations, conformance with which meets the requirements of the Commission for issuance of a constructioa permit or manufac-turing license."

However, it should be noted that the Commission also indicated in that notice that some elements in the TMI Action Plan have not been acted upon and thus may be required at a future date.

10 CFR 2.761, the so-called "immediate effective-ness rule" as most recently amended to include special review procedures formerly in Appendix B, contains the following applicable to construction permits and manufacturing licenses:

In this regard it should be understood that as a result of analyses still under way the 8109100313 810827 Commission may change its present regulations PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR

Contact:

Martin G. Malsch, OGC, 41465 SECY NOTE:

IN CONNECTION WITH SECY-81-20D THE GENERAL COUNSEL EAS INDICATED THAT THE CHANGES TO 10 CFR PART 2 CONTAINED HEREIN ARE NEEDED.

PLEASE VOTE ON THIS AS A SEPARATE ISSUE, BY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1981 SO THIS CAN BE AFFIRMED AT THE AUG. 27 AFFIRM. SESSION WHERE SECY-81-20D IS NOW SCHEDULED.

(THIS PAPER IS IDENTICAL TO THE ADVANCE COPY DISTRIBUTED BY OGC. )

2 and regulatory policies in important respects and thus compliance with existing regulations may turn out to no longer warrant approval of a license application.

Furthermore, the Commission may in a particular case determine that compliance with existing regulations and policies may no longer be sufficient to warrant approval of a license application and may alter those regulations and policies.

The quoted language from 10 CFR 2.764(e) was included in the rule because, as a result of the TMI Action Plan, the NRC was imposing several requirements beyond current regulations in individ-ual licensing cases. This was made necessary by the fact that the current regulations were adopted before the TMI accident and had not been brought up to date.

If the. commission adopts the recommendation in SECY-81-20D, then the regulations will be brought up to date, at least for cps and perhaps for manufacturing licenses as well.

Thus some conform-ing changes to 10 CFR 2.764 (and perhaps 10 CFR 2.504) will be required.

We have prepared the attached draf t language for the notice of rulemaking to accomplish this.

Also, the statement on page 26 of the preamble that "the Commission is currently considering a proposed rule effecting TMI-related licensing requirements for operating reactors" needs to be deleted in light of Commission action on SECY-81-422.

Attachment:

Draft rule fA' Leonard Bickwit,Jr.

U General Counsel y,

3 f.

Commissioners' comments or consent should be provided directly to the Office of the Sacretary by c.o.b. August 26, 1981.

Commission Staff Office comments, if any, should be submitted to the Commissioners NLT August 24, 1981, with an information copy to the Office of the Secretary.

If the paper is of such a nature

.I that it requires additional time for analytical review and comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised of when comments may be expected.

This paper is tentatively scheduled for consideration at an open meeting during the week of August 24, 1981.

Please refer to the appropriate weekly Commission Schedule, when published, for a specific date and time.

l Distribution:

Commissioners Commission Staff Offices EDO ASLBP ELD j

l l

1 l

I I

Draft Rulo Change

[ deletions in brackets; additions underscored]

1.

Add the following to the preamble on page 31 of Enclosure 3:

In the Notice of Rulemaking (46 FR 18045) published on March 23, 1981, under Substance of the Rule, the Commission stated, "It is the Commission's view that this new rule, together with the exist-ing regulations, form a set of regulations, con-formance with which meets the requirements of the Commission for issuance of a construction permit or manuf acturing license. "

The Commission reaffirms this view and, to eliminate any ambiguity regarding its intent, is amending its special review procedures in 10 CFR 2.764 to delete the statement in paragraph (e) that compliance with existing regulations may turn out to no longer warrant approval of a license application.

However, it should be noted daat the Commission also indicated in that notice that some elements in the TMI Action Plan have not been acted upon and thus may be required (at a future date) on the basis of future rulemaking.

2.

Amend 10 CFR 2.764(e) to read as follows:

(e)

Construction Permits (1)

Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (i)

(ii)

In reaching their decisions the Boards should interpret existing regula-tions and regulatory policies with due consideration to the implicat'.ons for those regulations and policies of the Three Mile Island accident.

[In this regard it should be understood daat as a result of analyses still under way the Commission may change its present regu-lations and regulatory policies in impor-tant respects and thus compliance with existing regulations may turn out to no longer warrant approval of a license application.]

As provided in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, in addition to T~~

~

~

l

~

2 taking generic rulemaking actions, the Commission will be providing case-by-case guidance on changes in regulatory policies.bs conducting its reviews in adjudicatory proceedings.

The Boards shall, in turn, apply these revised regulations and policies in cases then pending before them to the extent that they are applicable.

The Commission expects the Licensing Boards to pay particular attention in their deci-sions to analyzing the evidence on those safety and environmental issues arising under applicable Commission regulations and policies which the Boards believe present serious, close questions and which the Boards believe may be crucial to whether a license should become effective before full appellate review is completed.

Further-more, the Boards should identify any aspects of the case which in their judg-ment, present issues on v.tich prompt Commission-policy guidance is called for.

The Boards may request the assist-ance of the parties in identifying such policy issues but, absent specific Commission directive, such policy issues shall not be the subject of discovery, examination, or cross-examination.

(2)

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Boards (3)

Commission (1)

(ii)

(iii)

In announcing the result of its review of any Appeal Board stay decision, the Commission may allow the proceeding to run its ordinary course or give what-ever instructions as to the future hand-ling of the proceeding it deems appropri-ate (for example, it may direct the Appeal x..,

4 a

e====-.m==w.

s

3 Board to review the merits of particular issues in expedited fashion; furnish policy guidance with respect to particular issues; or decide to review the merits of e

particular issues itself, bypassing the l

Appeal Board).

(Furthermore, the Commis-

)

sion may in a particular case determine that compliance with existing regulations and policies may no longer be sufficient to warrant approval of a license applica-tion and may alter those regulations and policies.]

3.

If the final rule does not include manuf acturing licenses, then 10 CFR 2.504 should be amended to read as follows:

S 2.504 Applicability of other sections.

The provisions of Subparts A and G relating to construction permits apply to manufacturing licenses subject to this subpart, with respect to matters of radiological health and safety, environmental pro-tection, and the common defense and security, except that S 2.104 (a) and (b) do not apply to manufactur-ing licenses and compliance with the exi_ sting _sub-stantive regulations applicable to qqngtruction permits may turn out.t_o not wa_rXanl_appIoyAl_of__a_

manufacturing license epplication.

The provisions of Subparts A and G relating to construction permits and operating licenses apply, respectively, to con-struction permits and operating licenses subject to this subpart, except as qualified by the provisions of this subpart.

4 4.

If the reservation regarding manufacturing licenses is confined to the hydrogen control issue, and the adequacy of the hydrogen control regulation in 10 CFR 50.46, then it would be highly desirable to confine the underlined additional language to this issue.

In this event, 10 CFR 2.504 should be amended to read:

S 2.504 Applicability of other sections.

The provisions of Subparts A and G relating to construction permits apply to manufacturing licenses subject to this subpart, with respect to matters of radiological health and safety, environmental pro-tection, and the common defense and security, except that S 2.104(a) and (b) do not apply to manufactur-ing licenses and compliance with existing re.gula-

.tions on hydrogen control _.follo_ wing __A_ loss.of-coolant..

~

  • This assumes that existing regulations would be regarded as sufficient for issuance of cps for plants with manufacturing license approved designs.

4 accident applicable to construction permits may not be sufficient, insofar as hydrogen control safety issues are concerned, to warrant approval of a manufacturing license application.

The provisions

~

of Subparts A and G relating to construction permits and operating licenses apply, respectively, to con-struction permits and operating licenses subject to this subpart, except as qualified by the provisions of this subpart.

e i

h

_v

.