ML20138S062

Summary of 851025 Meeting W/Util Re Util Emergency Mgt Plan Submitted in Dec 1984.Util Response to Encl Request for Addl Info Will Be Provided in Time to Support Jan 1986 Completion of Review.Attendance List & Viewgraphs Encl

ML20138S062
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	11/01/1985
From:	Kadambi N Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8511190462
Download: ML20138S062 (49)

Text

.

e

, NOV 1 1985 Docket Nos.: 50-498 and 50-499 APPLICANT: Houston Lighting & Power Company FACILITY: South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2

SUMMARY

OF MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 25, 1985 TO DISCUSS THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN The applicant requested this meeting to obtain staff feedback on the Plan submitted in December,1984. The attendees are shown in Enclosure 1.

Discussion The applicant made a presentation using the viewgraphs shown in Enclosure 2.

The objective was stated to be that a plan approved by NRC should be in place for the emergency exercise currently scheduled for July 1986. The applicant is hosting a conference on October 31, 1985 between themselves and federal, state and local authorities to help prepare for the exercise.

The staff informed the applicant that the review of the plan has been partially completed with approximately 20% remaining to be done. The revicw has generated a request for additional infonnation which was handed to the applicant and has been enclosed herewith on Enclosure 3. The applicant and staff representatives discussed each item on the list. The applicant indicated that responses will be provided for the enclosed items, and those which would arise upon completion of the review, in time to support having a final version of the plan in January, 1986.

UAldlNAL SIGNED BY N. P. Kadambi, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page MPK DL:LB#3 , DL:LB#3 NPKadambi/yt: WKnight 10/3pf85 g(10/ /85 V\

85y11 N E e F

Mr. J. H. Goldberg Houston Lighting and Power Company South Texas Project CC' Brian Berwick, Esq. Resident Inspector / South Texas Assistant Attorney General Project Environmental Protection Division c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 12548 P. O. Box 910 Capitol Station Bay City, Texas 77414 Austin, Texas 78711 Mr. Jonathan Davis Mr. J. T. Westermeir Assistant City Attorney Manager, South Texas Project City of Austin Houston Lighting and Power Company P. O. Box 1088 P. O. Box 1700 Austin, Texas 78767 Houston, Texas 77001 Ms. Pat Coy Mr. H. L. Peterson Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Mr. G. Pokorny Power City of Austin 5106 Casa Oro P. O. Box 1088 San Antonio, Texas 78233 Austin, Texas 78767 ,

Mr. Mark R. Wisenberg Mr. J. B. Poston Manager, Nuclear Licensing Mr. A. Von Rosenberg Houston Lighting and Power Company City Public Service Boad P. O. Box 1700 P. O. Box 1771 Houston, Texas 77001 San Antonio, Texas 78296 Mr. Charles Hallican Jack R. Newman, Esq. Mr. Burton L. Lex Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. Bechtel Corporation 1615 L Street, NW P. O. Box 2166 Washington, D.C. 20036 Houston, Texas 77001 Melbert Schwartz, Jr., Esq. Mr. E. R. Brooks Baker & Botts Mr. R. L. Rance One Shell Plaza Central Power and Light Company Houston, Texas -77002 P. O. Box 2122 Corpus Christi, Texas 78403 Mrs. Peggy Buchorn Executive Director Citizens for Equitable Utilities. Inc.

Route 1, Box 1684 Brazoria, Texas 77422 i

i

Houston Lighting & Power Company South Texas Pro,iect cc:

Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Lanny Sinkin Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power 3022 Porter Street, NW #304 Wasnington, D.C. 20008 Mr. S. Head, Representative Houston Lighting and Power Company Suite 1309 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 1

f

ENCLOSURE 1 e South Texas Project l Meeting on Emergency Management Plan October 25, 1985 Name Organization N. P. Kadambi NRC/NRR/DL J. G. Dewease HL&P

, M. A. McBurnett HL&P/ Licensing N. F. Walker HL&P C. R. VanNiel NRC/IE/EPB M. R. Wisenburg HL&P/ Licensing

. E. F. Williams NRC/IE/DEPER l

t i

4 e P

--n. -.n- - - - - -, vn --v--e.,a -. - . . , - - ---.-r -

--e r- --,. . . , - - - , , - - - - . . , - . - - - -

9 w

G e t

2

<1 a

CL W

Z w

E LaJ (3

Z

• C ld e

• D N e w e

0 Cr d W V E w

$ vs

%L C w

CL Co 9

o .

I. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE FORMAT SITE / AREA DESCRIPTION ,'

I i

l l

l I

l l

s II. ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR GROUP 1

ONSITE ONSHIFT EMERGENCY

S L Y E C V N Y E E C L G N R E N T E G O N M R I E E E T V M C E A E A E L R L Y A A A C U T R N S R E E E U E T N G N L I E R U A S G E

M E * * *

• I I

I

o .

IV. EMERGENCY AND RECOVERY ACTIONS NOTIFICATION ACCOUNTABILITY EVACUATION ACTIONS FOR EACH EAL

4 S

S E

N D

E R

A P

E R

P G N

Y I S C N L N I L E A I G R R R T D E

M E * "

V

1 i

1 1

VI. FACILITIES 1

E0C i

TSC OSC CONTROL ROOM MIC PNS O

VII. MEDIA RELATIONS POLICY MIC ACTIVATION SPECIAL REQUESTS 4

4 4

i -

4 P

i 4

1

)

L E

N A

P N

W O

D T

U H Y S T I

M Y L O R I O A B R I A L T L I I O X B R U A T A H N

O C *

• I

O l

l II. TSC s

CONTR01. ROOM ENVELOPE l

l 5000 SQ FT 25 PERSONS ERFDADS RMS RADIO AND TELEPHONE LAYOUT

, . - e 2 -_. A u __ ._

G l

O M

f I

4 U

O J

U m

o o M

Y M

i M

• 8 g. .

h 9

e

. _ _ _ _ - -_. - ,.-.__ , - , . _ _e , ,-

g- _ _- -w-- <_y, , ______. 7,,- ._,,.__,._m..

i l

l IV. 00C l

5000 SQ FT 35 PERSONS 0.5 MILES EAST PF = 5 ERFDADS TELEPHONE / RADIO

^

RMS AUXILIARY DG LAYOUT

l -

l l

\ -

I $

a V. MEDIA INFORMATION CENTER BAY CITY HOLIDAY INN 12 AIR MILES NNE l

150 PEOPLE l ,

h

=

4 4

l

SCHEDULE

~

EMP SUBMITTED TO NRC 12/84 PNS OPERATIONAL 10/85 i

EPPs TO BE SUBMITTED - EARLY 86 NRC APPRAISAL - EARLY 86

SENARIOS TO NRC 5/86-EXERCISE TIME LINE TO NRC 6/86 3 EXERCISE 7/86 FEMA CERTIFICATION OF PNS - LATE 1986

m.

W lN .. .:

~ .- y g

j .~ ..( . . . +;3,.,A,  ! . ,, -4 3. ..#.. . .

,s . tv

. ~ ~ ; R.V ^ A'f. .(U ..,] \. -i-

['ik?a.

- x. .m : .- '~"

+ 3, -.x lA -

.:k f D . y'. 9 '] ,i,l. . . . .W . .m x :. w 3

[

^

( } ~j '

~'.}

.. y%'g. s ..,

/$ y . ..

"y J .; - p-W.gG _ .

g

. ((..g

~~7 7,. ; , .

'. , - '-- .h.,,, ,

m.. m.. Ay ~-

', A -

. . - - ~.... i;

n. , , r.-.p. -- ,.

~ .

E.w.f v.w . 1. ,.. w.w ' *Q

~

, . . s  %

f j y b

,M -' ~ ~-;i4- ~'L.'(a - p .1.,3

N. --- . .; %. . _ q '". sN N W ..

% j /. N . .

cn . e ~-

-n u ,

t

. >, <,y%_ ' %,

.Es~f..

4:-- .' . .y

. _. t. ,

% d.

- i

~~~ '

.'-- , .Q ; ~ ,.> . s 3

NW - .- -'.:.

N,. , , .

--- pt

• y.

-l ~t~ - . T. - '..- <_ % - - s . - ,

-z y .n

'. ~ _.g ,js ap (

'- .-}- .,

.;G

,, ' _>. .~l.

. ; p N,E s

. s '.

... ,q 3 -

• , . , ,, (' ,..#

g.

..o, ~; }. l g_ . -

,e q!i U/ .

\

s

.(

,l...r-.WN V' S.y e.* ' % , ' .,n

\

{g - '

• f ,

~

/ ',

/ , , , . [ ,., *

' s

" t

.p l

• - , -j ,

. ~

- EN Q

.=

"~ -

"' * .'*I.' . .,,, , ,.  : m '.

l .

'p-

~ ..

2--..

1 1...b,E% , .r' .**

• J 1 5

- .- *nj , ' ': . ,.

s., g l-' 10,leS ,

g- .,

s

.' i mi g  %

(~y'

' - \

! t -

'... e

/-.,, , +, m ' '= - E ,-

'l+ -

~

h -g t; '

Y l '

' T WS1 /'

l

-Q.c c ,' ' .

q w. , '/=

s,,,.._

.- ,l .3 o . * ~

-Q

• I l' . g -7 ,

f../.Q,. -

J I m

, F.. eSex . 2 c Mp 4

.y 3.i

s. , ,

t=

1

V ,~s .

w-

. . ... _ v. ..

=" -

SW- -1 1 . .c,i -

-.%. m ,

g.g e: . ,. =

. A .,, .

,{f. (

. . -. c 2, a

-),

- 'gg _

. .--l - y

,_ ~

';==

.E. .

~

~

bSSN .

Q $r / .,.

S , SSE jf--. ,f

' ~

L ~= 1

l. y lp - ..

.. . /

.s E.o  ;

• ee E-  ; e*

i I

FIGURE 7 .- _ - _ _ _ t

=

J 1

i 9 ...

\g r . - < , r . ~1 l y.- ,  % .......,n,..s., l

,G J'~ """"\ ./ ...

4, ,

w.,

(

... . , ~~.. ,, ,. .,e, -*"](.~ :,,, ...

. . 4. . -

.----l t.. i

- F4-1 Eh { [

(

[ ... . ". ,,, "h,

,/

[) '

J

[' { . i, f ....coao covar*

f r;.9 L. 'T ,N,

, sm...M .

( , .-

k I

a-- .f . . . . .

-[ ,,.. s

,e .x :. ,\  :

Y,

(

, O

.~j-t

..> . .r-<.Njs v ,.

l N _ ,,q [,) <, ,

y

\ ,.e- gR.' LEGEno:

..:- ~

, m -

c_ - ./"

i  :

~,.p.%C o , /q .. ,/ ; n, # ~ ,.

l j

/

k.:3.j.

.( ~

h 1

3; t 9

(-)

xh.

s

.i 7, .# 4 s,m

.-o -

i-

. _j .. i. . . .. .. . j f  : ~J u

/I

-m 's'

' d g (,v / n~i-"<ii l '! _,, --

\.'

t j ,

')b:-----. .f f / .95 co-tv n d" v --

': /

j)/[ . - {J"~> j ,, i

~

%gl i-o,m, .- r e--i e5y .-

j,7 x

v.,

.u.... ,,/

.t

'G i":.

) .

pie -

(/

1 y(/ ,

7 o..,,,,. , r ~. i .

1. l

.-/

- .' - (m lsc ,/ /

\ ( f(4 ^

- (' r 1

.f,/

,r

}

)' , .

>! /

oui.oin 6 u i .o n

- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 8

UNITS 1 & 2

}

)' / ~~

, . fg f. , 4 ** * ' ' ~'  !!1tEDIAT[ [w[poris GF THE M

f _ wipt it As l'R0JfCT

-me rit.itt 2.i-2

p. g. . t .- g ? "#

4 h

b U

- w

~~ s.

r i t oc @ -

'd il li

> e: v3 -

E! -

e r- .

E h5 h5 4m bI E "., 0

.:2 ~;! : x t-

-' -!  ;  ::= : - 7 $z) Ed

- : C

• 8 $7: $II E *

.) I C b e'p.

• } .k w t

b E

l <y,[

> .l D

I /

j *

,i.i.j}"c.},a i e O

c i. .. .. ,

i ,:

I.s e a ..

' -"~:S

} . ], k8 #$

T

' ;} 3

0 glijjjj L__ _ _ . q

' eo v.  !:,,.

I g:.

i c.. e t, v3 ). . >< ; e . .

,~. -

l

~s h ,

%4'r.

ijg /p -

r ;. : s.-fN,d. r r.

Ni- .3 , i

" .f ;;.!r -f i'Ji y \L '

N: 1. ! -

I l ~jl 5

u.;si i h - 1' .s,i uYJ'II. -

i: L .r  :

,N I e 6 e j/ * .

T. ( . i , . .,

7e .p jI,T.yl b. .L u/

./: lh.1 b- s;,.$O,Y'.d,',>;

N i

q .

-1. y M- .

7 9+.N+

?

e T,. // , ,\ + ,

=

1 .

t 3: Q' n

pi .,,.

\

hj,fg ,

i 'v.

u j

Vrh =s ', -

+ \

Jy s, pf . o, 2 .- .S pr * - .

,..?

,f.._k,'.i' Qf '

g~E ~~ ' '

3*$qik./kl/sj !Y,',N' l-O ,

' i'

'.r'.dl'i

-W, h, . ,<i s. .,;.

/

..c . 1.. .__. .

i -i

'* f'  :; .

"g '/ ./ .s,,.

/..

~

.t"* h. Ib,r 'c *  ;'*

, . N,l,

- l-3 1*.p x,

[ h 'k!k s. \h[ .l y

Ds

'{.[

.i

. O .

f,

~sp.,. 4,3 .,j ,i *,<

N 3

= -g 'q /

• ' ', / ., y ,' $7"' -3T' i N i

- \ a ,

, \ .

,a .

}. C ',' . /', .I .! ' .(

N l j Mt , , , ' ' - '1 V ./ j -

. Q' . b.7" r- ' \,.

e.-

.! '/. '  ;< \'..N < , ,

p;s s , J.l.

i U N.' g N

,K'<

". 'I .,t'. .,

')/( . j. . s

' I jI * '\ / t.

' 5 ,' 'k

L,It .j i ['l>.] ,y N V;

a.'..g)d, ' k. ., u. .

,J. og - ,ti<.. . :-

'. Mn i / s .-

s!!.gl .i

./

_ _ _ _ t _ _ / r ___ _ _ _ _ _ . _

s.,, F j.%_. _g yl t..

. ,g. t.

.j \

e<! F., ,a -

- e eb

/ 6 / \ / ,

r CO O

C

-4 I

-4 m

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY EM SENIOR EXECUTIVE ORGANIZATION E3 OO m'

Zm Imannor pntCfOHS m E r"

>m ZO Og _.

mO cwamuaNa Cat s t ricurwg EQ mm (wr(tn Zz

-4 m T 2)

-4 z3 0

~

(n

-4 d

ta O

. cs.:e ussu.naim eat z 0s 8 01 R i

an-

~4

..,a,,,,

v(y Pwe e,rty Ng / F sf CUTIVE euuCL f an Geera e VICE Pnt $#0c NT o-GAQ#Wirf F#5$Of NI N *M NW NI FUI.e si A L CA0tr viCF P8tE SOf ht CAO # witt mit 50( Nt

$88C *d 14 ADWN51malsvt f alloweat ass aM I"'

',(,

-o g; .

,m 9

, fit

m SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION TITLE PAGE REV.

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN p [p g3g g p, L q,g Hi i)

!!E  !!:

y5 c 8 n.

D O

E 13

. O C E55

< Eri D

-.J 52 O

D Z

1 s n;a .1 t.:

FOGI 1 O f *- i 35 Y ::,

j

~.

au b

9 e

f /

<n O

C NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATIONS E m

X w,v on ,a,.,,s.~,

s,in, ~, c m aneo~s mm xx 0O m L-zm o0 y -4 EP m sai ..,, s "O. .,'.,=w c^,5" E

y o_.

s O5 mo 5O mm 2z

&m mx 5# <

n,~, ZE Surf m*4*t NOE N, O O

Z 9 = t ? "'

N.h

="4:!L r' ort a.ie.s m,a;';;;,s 9 ,r am=, ~'

,,, ~ , . ~,

-~~w g*

3 D

4 h

SUPPORT FUNCTlONS

r wa"~a[E.s 2 ='il.',"

.i .."S~ca?/,

i o ~,

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION STORES y PURCHASING SECURITY .q)@>

i NUCLE AR TRAINING -C.

x m

?

L i

l / /

i m

o c,

1 5 H m

x m>

, rm mm

• D 'U ao rn<-.

z 'n oo 4 H

' r*

>m NUCLEAR ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION zo

>~

- - om rn o CO Wf f*Hf $ltVNI I inen

.n i t an f Nt.t el ( feeNG Zg

-4,n A Ct wr'.t*8UC f oN pp DH Zp s Q

--4 d

o Z

--a waN au ant u,2a C(N(n,at uaN.,aG(m

,,cir. u Naara h.. r~H '

II y c'y I 8 ass.H,,f,f a ., .

O(

e.

J S, O m

m b

TITLE PAGE REV.

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN [f yft#, f. [

f. (p

. I x

at ha r-2 G

G Z

z _

d E c

H 5 o 95 3 E, c si as

< 25

}

t.u y .

J b O

D Z

q e

I st

=

2 s

e

- - ,=.

-- r

e

@OC4I4m w mNOLmo4

- ; mlo4Eo

- Qm2mD yO (nA>f

-- - OZ "- m

!1

>Om mar<,

mem3OmZo4 fZ>Om(F2* M Z i

T gs w 9P )

N\ s.

e o

ac r

c. .

a

~

u a .

ao r

c.i

=

E C

um a

N A r R C N

U RI A

S (WL.

S f, A S' A NA AT M!l Y A l

T J I

L O A

U .

O o am r

c i.

=a

=

=m o t

s

' .. - .- 'L

. c. ..'

r a.

r. 4c

. .A _

u s

e _

1 l!

,e SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENER ATING STATION TITLE PAGE REV.

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN p[gg,gg g , g g. 73 g m

3 19]

IIl ,

'i' vi

'h e,i 3t n fit

,,1 i i

1:'l ;it Dt

8:s

$ ija ir* II$ !jd P I

, l l l 1 m

O

< ll:,s  !"l lg$ 9 I

.a d*i l'h Ez 5

ik lI DI "I !s1 m . g5 .--- i i i i i E2 G5 aii

!e I v we r)

.  ; ) .

3 3 C5  !' ' li ,I ' 3;'

$Q 'II c"

ma a

.I!j!q

!!.j ,i*b li!sa gz *s yov c I i i c.

a d P  ;. ,k o.

g g!

!.)

1;5 p;5 e

sis g,s 5 o

2 . f I l i I i f

.jJ - jj} j}.

• llsl.

r

.sa e#

1 I I la e. i a e '

ii-i

id l e

ii id ir ii;

,j 1 ,

a . I i t

j e

l . .

1 1 -

h f

. v, O

C

\ -4 I

--4 m

l X m1 R U' t

i m 'o

~1111 l OO t ri t-SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELI C TRIC GENERATING STATION 7m c50 ONSHIFT COMPUME NT <*

\

l

( PG 0t, unsY) K*

1.tn Z

2. -4 O

O2 wm.~. . mn m se

_ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ra m m L.E AD 2Z w Hrn 1

i ~ ~. .. .. * .

c,

~ . . .. .. . c. .

'O 23

.. n.....

s. S. _24

[Q "'" [() m .,  %,..r ; . " ""d*

ZE O

u,

.~. e . <.. y,4

• "' *

• o"***5 a "-- ~

• m me , , .:. :.. . .~~ . , ~ , c w. a" .;...

' , -.4 l g,3 6 Z

l ~'. -"

l

. - - . .J. L. .--~. ,, ,, %

p

.a =o a* gh Dm

\ .

l 4 l C

. . . . .s,..,

a, <.

rne s .e.,ea.

00

~

A m

CD D D

' m i

o ,5

s

. S7JTH TEXAS Paa7ECT ELECTRIC GENERATItG STATION DEMENCY FW4AGEMENT PIRJ ATTACINENT 9 C4ENENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATIONS P.G E Figure 9.1 Onshif t Daergency Organization 9-2 Figure 9.2 E,ergency Operations Center 9-3 D.ergency Organization Figure 9.3 Media Relations Organization M t

• l

_ _ _ _ _ - - - . - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------**------------------------------- - - - - - - - --- -~ - ~~

, r f m

o C

-4 I

ON-SHIFT EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION (1)  ;;;

X m>

,,,,<.,,,, cm g3 gg m-c zm i

oo

-< d I I r.

>m f 4 5 H4 FW.

.....n.,

I'fA b19 (.fu IPd

'L'=

CF NTT gQ (fM #ff M.J.H 7055 y

Ko mm I

l tu r4 I I I zz

~4rq

"',..c.

';* "",,atgd;

. = +IE "~i e0N'M-e ,',' ,,k(, adf' ,',a{rr u . ,

z, O

-4 I

I I d

,m nte o

--' -r A" ,"In r n.c

^, ;'s":.".'J;f?

z n er e -u i y

e a

f 1

m""

e . .=vy (1) THE ON shirt CAfrRGENCY ORGA NIZA TION IS AUG AfEN TED, AS REQUIRED. D Y DU T Y RESPONSE AND S TA TION PERSONNEL UNTIL l THE EAfERGENCY WARRANTS THE EAfERGE!!CYOPERA TIONS CEN TER ORGANIZA llON TO BE ES Ts '.0LISHED e4

• rret g s ..= r.U885

'O l O l rn

( (y $,4.g gy, AI W [ MIN INT A44 3

l . .. ~ r l'

(

cn O

C 1 -4 l I

! e m

X m>

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER ORGANf2ATION h,".D n

I I I OO e .. . . . , - . . .. f T,,1 L r.

c-m

- 1 .

g cr . -. cr . oO 4 -4 I_

8- . _ _ _ _ _ - I m t -ui . r-1,  ; >m r.

...~... mm,,i, zo p -4

,8 cr==. .n .= QE I "'%. mo

'1 t @ c== s-, KQ mm l l h

.ee >

,4 rin i rp

, p -4 Zne

=.--w

~=-m. .. O

\

1 -

r - - - - - -

=

I -4

- __ _4

, I l ]

. .e

. ,. O

.ms

. _ ___ g,~, <..

.. ,r, a*-==>

a*=,=,= g i I l d

-4 s,

_' ,'aga

, c, ma.e . ***'S me .s new F

m. m I

r I

I

<m m er., e

. .r.e.e r.

• ".w-

. . . , . a ..

n.a.n *. .

I n

e ...e.se a=.w.~-w = _

1 r----- --- ,

n

, ,r.=.. .n v- .

.e .o

.. . r - e = c. A*,.7 . l m i

a.. s.i 3

t

.n g

Of 5 'J f F .. . e . m

! ON SITE tn c

I

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENER AVING STATIOM TITLE PAGE REV EMERGENCY M AN AGEMENT PLAN .

a

s. I. s.

I$ h hii ri;;

Lg 4

F ii

s N si 3 i E "5

< p3 O

C .f j;

o ;0 C 5 W 7

>- E G z

w  !=

a *!

a s'

U hf If z  :-  ;:

9 i P I I

< I 2 I !s C '5 O i LL fit Z

w g

I (I a .

$3 W -

2 E gg .,

i

• t eg

• I 6

4 0

a

__.________.____.________________.___.__________________________._____a

- **

• T ESSE'L OI OR HAfo eopy

$;, REACTOR COOLANT

SUMMARY

""l""l5'

, C:13 LOOP A LOOPB LOOP C LOOP D TAVC TAVC TAVC TAVC XX .- F XXXF usF XXX F PIR

- - m yh

,- 1A Th 13 Th 1C Th 1D PRESS k # -650 -650 #

-650 -650

{gg

~

\/ - \/ - \/ - \/

610 -610 -610 -610

. F LVL F - F - F w XXX J L ' ' -570 PRCT 570 d

' E -570 d

-570 d -_

- 530 S-530 - 530  :-- 53 0

/ . RX YSL \

DT DT DT DT g Xh4 F XXX F XXX F XM 4 F j d L Te d ' Te d '

Tg d ' Tc

-650 -650 -650 -650

-610 610 -610 -610

. -- -- ==

RCP - F RCP F RCP - F RCP - F

.- {-570 570 -570 'g'-570 '-

5

. RUN R RUN 530 g

-530 {530

• 530 -

2 H FLON FLON FLOW FLON _ P _

XXXXX XXXAX XXXX X XXXX X _

3

r ...

. D L "5

Enclosure [

Review Coments On The South Texas Project Electric Generating

' Station Emergency Plan (December 26. 1984)

Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 The following comments apply to the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Emergency Plan (herein after referred to as the plan) and identify in parenthesis, the applicable evaluation criteria of 10 CFR 50 or Regulatory Guide 1.101, Revision 2 (NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1).

A. Assignment of Responsibility

1. The plan does not identify the state and local organizations within the

.)

State of Texas other than the Texas State Division of Emergency Management

and the Matagorda County Sheriff's Office that are intended to be part of the overall response. (A.1.a and App. 5) i

2. The plan does not specify each Federal, state or local organization having an operational role in the emergency response, except the Department of Emerggame and does not specify the concept of operations or their rela-tionship to the total effort. (A.1.bandA.3)

\

3. The plan does not provide a block diagram illustrating the interrelation-ships between the applicant and the various Federal, state and local-6i organifations and suborganizations during emergency conditions. (A.1.c) i

1 i

4. The plan does not identify a specific individual by title who shall be in charge of each Federal, state and local organization or suborganiza-tion having an operational role in the emergency response. (A.I.d)

5. Although the plan states the communications between the plant site, the Matagorda County Sheriff's Office and the Texas Department of Public f Safety are manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day and that the Bay City and Polacios Fire Departments as well as the Matagorda General Hospital are available 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, it does not discuss the availability of the Houston LightingandPowerCompany(HL&P)NuclearEngineeringandConstruction Department or other Federal, state and local organizations having an operating role in the emergency response. (A.1.e)  !

i i

6. Attachment 2 of the plan lists the agreement letters and references the j Federal Radiological Emergency Response plan referring to the concept of 7 I operations between the applicant and Federal, state and local agencies j and support organizations; however the agreement letters are not provideo, l the agreements are not adequate described and a signature page format is 1

j not used to verify these agreements. In addition the list of agreement letters does not appear to be complete. (A.3) i

7. Theplandoesnotdiscussthecapabilityforcontinuous(24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />) opera-tions for a protracted period of time or specify the individual responsible for asduring continuity of resources for HL&P in Houston as well as the l state and local organizations having an operating role in the emergency response. (A.4)

~3-B. Onsite Emergency Organization

1. The plan specifies the onsite emergency organization; however in Figure 9.2 this organization appears to be rather unwieldy in that 12 managers report directly to the Emergency Director. In addition duties are assigned to a Radiological Services Manager and it is unclear as to whether this is the Radiological Manager or some other individual not covered in the functional descriptions in the plan. (B.1andB.2)

2. Although the plan identifies a line of succession for the Emergency Director, it does not identify or describe the specific conditions and procedures for higher level utility officials assuming this position. (B.3)

3. The functions of the Emergency Director which may not be delegated are given in the plan, however they do not clearly include the responsiblity J.

i to notify offsite emergency authorities. (B.4) l i

4. Although minimum staffing requirements appear to be met in Table 2-1 and Figure 8.8 of the plan, they do not agree with each other and it is unclear as to whether Table 2-1 appites to shift staffing for one or two f reactor units. (B.5) i

5. In subsection 2.5.2 of the plan, the statement that emergency respon e

! I3 l personnel assigned to the Emergency Operations Center or Emergency l Operations Facility, (E0F) will not normally be in the E0F, "but in

! their responsible areas of the Station" is unclear and should be fully explained. (8.5and8.6) l

em

~

aAFT

6. The plan does not specify adequately the interfaces between and among the 3

onsite functional areas of emergency activity. HL&P in Houston and the 1

state and local emergency organizations to determine if they will be l .

effective. The diagram in Figure 9.2 is incomplete in that it does not illustrate all the Federal, state and local emergency organizations involvedintheresponse.(B.6)

I 1

7. The plan does not provide copies of the arrangements and agreements with contractor, private and local support agencies and the authorities, j responsibilities and limits on actions of these organizations are not I clearly delineated. (B.9) '

C. Emergency f.esponse Support and Resources

, i a

1. The e4pected response time to receive assistance from the U.S. Coast Guard is not given in the plan and although the plan indicates that assistance 3

in weather forecasts will be obtained, the source of this assistance is not identified.

(C.1.b) i

2. The plan does not specify specific applicant, state and local resources available to support the Federal rgsponse (e.g. near-site airfields, telephone and other comunications systems). (C.I.c) F

3. Thepilndoesnotindicatethattheapplicantwilldispatchrepresenta-tives to principal offsite government emergency operations centers. (C.2.b)

~ '

L .

DRAFT i- ,

t

4. The plan identifies radiological laboratories both onsite and offsite to provide radiological analysis assistance, however it does not describe [

their capabilities and copies of agreements with private organizations for the use of these facilities is not provided. (C.3) l l

! 5. The plan identifies a number of nuclear and other organizations that will

) provide assistance to the applicant in an emergency but the services are  ;

j not adequately described and letters of agreement are not provided. (C.4) l i

i

) D. Emeroency Classification System i

j j 1. The plan provides for an emergency classification system but the parameters I and specific instrument readings are not always provided. In addition, i the actions to be taken by the applicant under each emergency class do  !

i not always follow the criteria provided with respect to notification frequency, providing dedicated consnunicators or /.0P terminals to offsite l authorities, activation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) ac,d -

Operational Support Center (OSC), radiological monitoring, periocic press f

. briefings and availability of senior technical and management personnel to offsite authorities. (0.1andAppendix1) t i \

i

2. Theinitiatingconditionsfortheemergencyclassificationsystemgiven t,

! in the plan do not always provide an adequate emergency classificati6n i 6i ,

j as proVided in the criteria particularly for external events (e.g. earth- L i

i I

l

• DRAFT  :

1

) quakes, hurricanes, missiles). In addition a number of initiating  !

conditions in the criteria are not covered in this emergency classifica.  !

I tionsystem(e.g.offsitedoseprojectionsandexplosions). (0.2 and  !

I i Appendix 1) l

} E. Notification Methods and Procedures I

< i

1. The plan provides for an emergency notification procedure between the i F

i South Texas Project and offsite authorities; but it does not describe i I

the mutually agreeable bases for notification of response organizations l 1 or the procedures for verification. (E.1) l l  !

1 l 2. The plan does not adequately describe the procedures for alerting, noti-fying and mobilizing emergency response personnel both onsite and at  !

< l j HPR offices in Houston. (E.2)

? ,

3. The plan describes the contents of the initial emergency messages to be l sent from the plant; however, an example of the femat for these messages l j should be appended to the plan. (E.3) l i  !

i 1 i

! 4. The contents of followup emergency p ssages from the plant are described; ,

however, an example of the format for these messages should be appended

! i 5

i to the plan. (E.4) l j 6g I

~

DRAFT

3. The plan does not cover the testing of the entire emergency consnunica-tions system on a periodic basis. (F.3 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. IV.E.9)

G. Public Education and Infomation

1. The plan does not provide sufficient details on the types and topics of public information to be disseminated to determine if it meets the criteria. (G.1andG.2)

2. Although the plan provides for the Media Information Director or other designee, as the primary spokesman, these individuals are not identified in Table 2-2 and his relationship to the Consnunications Coordinator as well as the description of the public information organization is unclear. (G.3.aandG.4.a)

3. The location and facilities of the Media Information Center is not adequately described in the plan. (G.3.a)

4. The plan does not provide sufficient information on the arrangements for the timely exchange of information among the designated spokespersons from HP&L and the various Federal, ptate and local response organizations to evaluate these arrangements against the criteria. (G.4.b)

I

5. AlthouhtheplanprovidesforaRumorControlCoordinator,thisindi-vidual is not identified in Table 2-2 and his capabilities and staffing are not described. In addition the means and methods for dealing with rumors are not adequately described. (G.4.c)

DRAFT 7

I

5. The administrative and physical means for providing prompt instruction r

to the public are not adequately described in the plan including: (1) i wherewarningsirensarelocated;(2)whoisresponsiblefortestingand maintaining the siren system; (3) how are individual tone alert receivers distributed,maintainedandtested;(4)theinstructionsprovidedfor theuseoftonealertsandwhoprovidesthem;(5)whetherKMK5-FMis available to activate the tone alert system 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, seven days per week; and (6) how is this station directed to activate the tone alert

, system and by whom. (E.6) l

6. The plan does not adequately describe the contents of written messages with instructions for specific protective actions to be taken by the public and e nnples of these types of messages are not appended to the  ;

plan. (E.7) j F. Emergency Comunications  !

1. Although the plan provides for a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, redundant emergency I comunications system between the South Texas Project, HP&L in Houston, Matagorda County Sheriff's Office and Texas Department of Public Safety inPierce,itdoesnotprovideadeguateinformationonthecommunications  ;

other state and local agencies and emergency operations centers. (F.1) ,

2. Thep'idndoesnotprovidethetitlesandalternatesoftheseindividuals L

responsible for the State and local comunications links. (F.1and10 i CFR50,AppendixE,IV.E.9) ,

I I

' ~

~

DRAFT

.g.

i

6. The program to annually acquaint news media with emergency plans, infor-mation concerning radiation and with points of contact for the release f

of emergency information are not adequately described. (G.5)

H. Emergency Facilities and Equipment l

l l 1. The description of the Technical Support Center (TSC) is unclear and implies that there is one TSC for the station while the FSAR indicates there is a TSC for each reactor unit. The information on the TSC given in FSAR Appendix 7A should be included in this description of the faci-lities and any discrepancies corrected between the plan and the FSAR. ,

1 The plan indicates there are drawings for the layout and location of the TSC In Attachment 19. however no such drawings are provided in the plan.

l FSAR Figures 7.A.5.8-4 and 7.A.5.8-2 should be provided in Attachment 19 i i

] of the plan. In addition the description of the emergency data acquist-tion systems, availability of data, infomation, drawings and radiation l monitoring instrumentation should be provided. (H.1) l

2. The description of the Operational Support Center (OSC) is inadequate and the layout and exact location are not provided in the plant although the

, plan states these are shown in Attaphment 19. FSAR Figure 7.A.5.8 1 and l

! a layout drawing of the OSC should be provided in the plan. (H.1) s' I

i I

i a

i

DRAFT  :

3. The plan description of Emergency Operations Center, which is the equiva-i lent of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), is incomplete and should include the information given in FSAR Appendix 7A. The figures provided  ;

! in Attachment 19 of the plan are inadequate and should be replaced by [

FSAR Figures 7.A.5.8-5, 7.A.S.8-6 and 7.A.S.8-7. Also the backup or [

alternate EOF address is not provided, ro layout of this facility is pro-vided and the time necessary to activate ti.is facility is not given. (H.2)

4. The Houston Emergency Operations Center, the Radiation Protection Office and the $1te Access Facility appear to be part of the emergency response facilities but < heir functions are not clearly described in the plan.

The functions and staffing of these facilities and their locations should  ;

I be provided. (H.1andH.2)  ;

5. The plan does not clearly describe the activation and staffing of the TSC, OSC, EOF and other facilities; however FSAR Appendix 7A states that the TSC and EOF can be staffed in approximately one hour. The plan

. should provide a clear description of the activation and staffing including staffing times and where the key numbers of the emergency organization will be located during each emergency classification. (H.4) t I 6. The plan provides a description of the seismic and meteorological mont-toringsystems,buttherangeandsensitivityofthisinstrumentatick andhoEthedatafromthesesystemsistransmittedtotheemergency l response facilities is not provided. (H.5.a)  ;

1  :

i i

- DRAFT 4

7. The plan does not provide an adequate description of the plant radio-logical monitoring systems or how the data from these systems to transmitted to the emergency response facilities. The plan should include a summary of the information on these systems provided in FSAR Sections 7.5.1, 9.3.2. 9.3.6, 11.5.2 and other appropriate FSAR sections as well as a description of how these data are transmitted, displayed r

and what data is available in the TSC and EOF. (H.5.b)

, 8. The plan does not provide an adequate description of the plant process monitoring and ESF instrumentation and does not described how the data from this instrumentation is transmitted and displayed and what data is available in the TSC and E0F. (H.5.6)

9. The plan does not describe how meteorological data will be acquired from offsiteorfromothersources(H.6.aandH.8) l 10. The description of the offsite radiological monitor capability and equip-ment is not provided. (H.6.b)

11. The description of the offsite laboratory facilities and equipment to supportonsiteandoffsitemonitoringisnotadequateintheplan.(H.6.c)

\

12. The plan does not provide for offsite radiological monitoring or equ)p-ment.'(H.7)

. _-_ _. . .-. - -. . _ _ . _ - = _ _., _ _ - . _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ .

DRAFT

. I

13. The plan does not adequately describe the provisions for inspection, f

inventory and checking operability of emergency instrumentation and i equipment or the frequency of these inspections and checks. (H.10) [

l l

14. Appendix 18 of the plan provides for lists of portable instrumentation and other equipment for emergencies, however the ranges and sensitivi-i ties of the instrumentation is not provided and most the lists do not ,

appear to be complete. The most co mon omission observed was dosimetry.

]

(H.11) j

15. The plan does not describe how field monitoring data and samples will be collected and analyzed or how the data frosi Federal, state and local organizations will be coordinated.

i '

i

!. Accident Assessment i

I j 1. The plan does not completely identify the plant systems or provide the l effluent parameter values for a spectrum of off-normal conditions and I I l accidentstotheexampleinitiatingconditions(e.g.doseprojections).

I The plan does not always specify the kinds of instruments being used and

< their capabilities. (1.1)

\

2. Theplandoesnotprovideadequateinformationonthecapabilities, hypes of inktlrumentation and equipment and resources for accident assessment including post accident sampling, effluent monitors, in plant iodine and l particulate measuring instrumentation and radiation monitoring in contain-ment to detemine if the criteria are met. (1.2) 1 i

DRAFT

. 1

3. The plan does not adequately describe the methods and techniques to be 1

used to detemine the source tem of releases of radioactive material from the plant or radiation instrument readings expected. (I.3.a)

! 4. The plan does not adequately describe the methods and techniques to detemine the magnitude of the radioactive releases based on plant system conditions and effluent monitors or measurements. (e.g. failed fuel monitors, PASS) (I.3.b)

5. The plan does not establish the relationship between effluent monotoring readings and onsite and offsite exposures and contamination for various meteorological conditions. (!.4)

6. The plan provides for the capability of acquiring and evaluating meteo-rological infomation; however, the description is not adequate for evaluation against the criteria. The NRC, state and local will have access to this data, but it is unclear how this information is provided to the TSC and EOF. (1.5)

7. The plan does not establish a methodology for determining the release

' rate / projected doses if the instrumentation used for assessment reads n

offscale or is inoperable. (!.6)

8. ThepIaIndoesnotdescribethecapabilities, techniques, instrumentation and other resources for field monitoring within the emergency planning zones and this capability does not appear to be an intrinsic part of the

, applicant's emergency operations. (1.7)

~

~ '

DAFT The plan does not adequately describe methods, equipment and expertise 9.

to make rapid assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of radiological hazards though the liquid or gaseous release pathways. The means of activation and notification of field team composition, transportation, cosuunication, monitoring equipment and estimated deployment times are not provided in the plan. (1.8)

10. The plan states that the applicant has portable instrumentation and equipment to measure 1 x 10'7 microcuries per cc of radiciodine under l c

field conditions, but the techniques and instrumentation are not described and the effects of the presence of noble gases and high back-i ground radiation are not provided. (1.9)

11. The means for relating various measured parameters to dose rates for the key radionuclides given in Table 3 of the criteria and gross radio-activity measurements are not described in the plan. The provisions for estimating integrated dose from projected and actual dose rates and i

comparing these estimates with the protective action guides is not adequately described. (!.10)

J. Protective Response g

1. The plan provides for transportation of onsite personnel using eithd HL&P'ofprivatelyownedvehiclesandstatesthattheevacuationroutes are provided in Attachment 17. However, no evacuation routes are in Attachment 17 and there is no information on the relocation or assembly areas for evacuated onsite personnel provided in the plan. (J.2)

~

DRAFT l- )

2. The plan does not adequately describe the methods, procedures, instru-1 mentation and equipment to be used for radiological monitoring of ,

personnel evacuated from the site. (J.3)

3. The plan provides for the evacuation of onsite non-essential personnel during a Site Area or General Emergency; however, the arrangements for i the possible radiological monitoring and decontamination of these I personnel are not adequately described. (J.4) i I

4 f

l 1

i

)

< \

4 I

. ii l

\

,- h' 1935 NOV 1 MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION DocketNo(s): 50-498/499 NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC PRC System D

GWKniahton Project Manager NPKadambi JLee NRC PARTICIPANTS N. P. Kadambi C. R. Vantliel E. F. Williams bcr: Applicant & Service List