ML20138R266
| ML20138R266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1985 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dolan J AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138R268 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8512310141 | |
| Download: ML20138R266 (2) | |
Text
-
b}hfl December 23, 1985 Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Electric Company ATTN: Mr. John E. Dolan Vice Chairman Engineering and Construction 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43216 Gentlemen:
This letter transmits to you the results of a special evaluation of the operational history for the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant for the period January 1983 to September 1985.
Region III has initiated augmented assessments of licensees for the purpose of early identificatic' of weak performance to preclude the occurrence of significant events.
To accomplish this objective, a special task force was fomed to identify problems that may exist at the D. C.. Cook facility. The results of this evaluation report (attached) were discussed with you and members of your staff on November 13, 1985 at the Region III office in Glen Ellyn, Illinois.
The report concluded that two major problem areas exist that need ininediate attention - personnel errors and missed surveillances. There are numerous examples found in both areas which appear indicative of poor management control.
Furthermore, other problems were identified such as:
excessive ESF actuations involving radiation monitors; excessive numbers of cordition reports; lack of control over work activities; failure to evaluate trending data; unauthorized procedure changes; and failure to hcnor coninitments.
Consequently, you are requested to evaluate your existing management control systems and develop both short and long terin action plans to improve -
performance. Your action plans should specifically address: the projected Category 3 functional areas mentioned above; personnel errors; trending; condition reports; ESF actuations; and control of work activities.
hffCK05000315 41 851223 DR P
.g fU ' l
r 5
1 American Electric Power Service 2
December 23, 1985 Corporation Within the next few weeks, we plan to issue the most recent SALP evaluation.
At that time, we will request your response to certain areas identified in the SALP report, as well as your response to the enclosed evaluation report.
Sincerely, Dr. t,:al ripad by
& m s 0, K ;plar James G. Keppler Regional Administrator
Attachment:
Evaluation Report cc w/ attachment:
W. G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission EIS Coordinator, USEPA Region 5 Office Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section RIII RIII RIII RIII R:JI RIII r
\\
L\\
$&V hol}.sr 4
Sue n ld Fehl Chrissotimos' lus Davis K
er lvll) lll9 sY' W l
IA 96
.