ML20138Q356

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Change to Physical Security Plan.Last Paragraph on Page 23 Re in-transit Physical Protection of SNM Eliminated. Paragraph Was Obvious Overcommitment & Should Not Have Been Part of Original Plan
ML20138Q356
Person / Time
Site: Pennsylvania State University
Issue date: 12/16/1985
From: Mcmaster I
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV., UNIVERSITY PARK, PA
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8512270156
Download: ML20138Q356 (1)


Text

- _

R.e d w ao- w e

\; wa.a TH E PEN NSYLVA NI A STATE UNIVERSITY njug y UMVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA 16802 College of Engineering Area Code 814 Penn State Breazcale Reactor 865-6351 December 16, 1985 USNRC-Region I 631 Park' Avenue

King of. Prussia, PA 19406 In accordance with paragraph 10CFR50.54(p) the Penn State UniversP.y makes the

' following change to the Physical Security Plan for The Pennsylvania State University, Breazeale Reactor.

The last paragraph on page 23 of the plan has been eliminated. That paragraph

- icads-as'follows:

The PSBR staff does not expect to arrange for the in-transit physical protection of the special nuclear material. However,

'f tre staff does arrance for the in-transit physical protection of tqe special nuclear material, the staff shall submit a change to this plan at least 120 days prior to the shipment date describing the physical protection system that will meet the applicable regulations'.

The paragraph being eliminated was an obvious over-commitment on the part of the University and should not have been a part of the original plan.

Elimination of this paragraph does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the plan. -This change can therefore be instituted under paragraph 50.54(p)

-without prior commission approval.

Sinceri ,

, L Ira B. McMaster Deputy Director IBM /pka 8512270156 851216 ADOCK 05000005 PDR -

pk AN EQUAL OPK)RTUNITY UNIVERSITY