ML20138P004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of Allegation Re Unqualified Individual Granted Access to Protected Areas W/O Adequate Security Screening.Requests Review for Validity & Significance of Issue.Results Should Be Available for NRC Review
ML20138P004
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/18/1985
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Edelman M
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8512240245
Download: ML20138P004 (2)


Text

p Scg w;9 Q 7)[

~

3G 9

DE0181985 -

gi w?

~

~

~

Docket No.:50-440 -

]

Docket.No. 50-441 o

The Cleveland Electric' Illuminating Company-i' ATTN
'-Mr.'Murray R.1Edelman -

~Vice President Nuclear Group-Post:0ffice Box 5000-Cleveland,-.0H 44101-

~

' Gentlemen:-

Region;III has received an'allegati u concerning an. individual working at the
Perry, site.f A sumary of that allegation. is enclosed for your. review.

It-is requested that you review this allegation to determine the validity and

< significance.of the issue.1We further request that the_ results of your review-be~available for Region =III-> inspectors after completion.--

^jYou'rcooperation._withusisappreciated. Should you have any questions with 2(regard to.this matter, please do not. hesitate to. call me or Mr. R. C. Knop.

.(312-790-5547).---

..p

~

-Sincerely,.

" Original Signed by E.G. Grecran"

,~^

Charles E. Norelius, Director-

-Division of Reactor Projects-

Enclosure:

. Sumary of Allegation Lcc w/ enclosure:-

J. J. Waldron, Manager,-Perry.

Plant Technical Department 4

M. D. Lyster, Manager,- Perry: Plant
Operations Department

.L.LO._ Beck, General Supervising Engineer, Nuclear _-Licensing and FuelJManagement Section

- DCS/RSB._ (RIDS) l Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Harold W..Kohn,;0hio EPA Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

> James W.; Harris, State of Ohio 851224o245 e5121s Robert H. Quillin,-Ohio-PDR ADOCK 05000440

~ Department of Health F

PDR 44S RIISg. RIII. -

RI':I[

RIIL,

RIII RIII-d'W

  1. 4

. RFLU j@

W W

LMcCormick-Barger/rl Knop-Warnick Neil P

k Greenman Norelius

12/to/85' 12/ o /85 - 12/10/85 ' 12/1d /85 - 12//o /85 12/)P/85 12/4/85

'RY9

.TEO / l \\

X.- -

cab

_u 1

' y V. -.m m

9 w e

^

  • h

[.* f w

~

fW D.

.+ L -

D

.g Enclo'sure

~

37 3

n;;,

R+. c i:

~,

x SUMARY OF ALLEGATION MN

,.;,,..;thenindidatAdthatthere.wasanotherindividualwhoinhisestimation

.rshould not.have:been permittediaccess to the-security areas:of the plant, but'

_

  • Ehadfadequately passed;the security screening-program.

-........would not-identify-i the individual by,name,;but he_ indicated Lthat he was the operator of?the CEI-Mi T owned 402 ton " cherry picker" and that-the individualehad a. fancy "h'airdo" and:

~

' f" neveriworeia hard hat because:he didn't want-to mess.up his " hairdo"...... stated i

ithat(thelindividual.'wa's' a chronic alcoholic 1and had been emp.loyed for three,

^

y years of; continuous' employment.. As such,.that; individual was not required;to

~

2takelthe KMPI. 3The only security' screening requirement in that situation was

,an acceptable' appraisal.from the individual's supervisor, which that crane-o operator lobtained; f...... indicated the individual's_ supervisor was also an-alcoholic.;

i.In _ summary.jthe essence:of;.......... allegations can be sumed up i.n two' parts.-

c.1 First.....;..... alleges that an unqualified individual was granted' access to the protected areas of:the Perry Nuclear Power Plant without adequate

,isecurityiscreenings

^

LSecond, /......... alleges that th'e aspect:of the security screening program -

~

~

Lwhich~ permits bypassing'of the MMPI~ test by'using supervisorsrecommenda-u tions when individuals have been employed for more than three years:is

- beingTinvalidated by0 improper supervisor analyses of employees-backgrounds.-

4

\\..

y

'.1.

i o

g r

}l p\\

.J b

[.

.ei

^'(,

(

m A

r 7

T ek r -'